Abstract
Chronic stress is associated with increased anxiety, cognitive deficits, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Repeated social defeat (RSD) in mice causes long-term stress-sensitization associated with increased microglia activation, monocyte accumulation, and enhanced interleukin (IL)-1 signaling in endothelia and neurons. With stress-sensitization, mice have amplified neuronal, immune, and behavioral responses to acute stress 24 days later. This is clinically relevant as it shares key aspects with post-traumatic stress disorder. The mechanisms underlying stress-sensitization are unclear, but enhanced fear memory may be critical. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of microglia and IL-1R1 signaling in neurons in the development of sensitization and increased fear memory after RSD. Here, RSD accelerated fear acquisition, delayed fear extinction, and increased cued-based freezing at 0.5 day. The enhancement in contextual fear memory after RSD persisted 24 days later. Next, microglia were depleted with a CSF1R antagonist prior to RSD and several parameters were assessed. Microglia depletion blocked monocyte recruitment to the brain. Nonetheless, neuronal reactivity (pCREB) and IL-1β RNA expression in the hippocampus and enhanced fear memory after RSD were microglial-independent. Because IL-1β RNA was prominent in the hippocampus after RSD even with microglia depletion, IL-1R1 mediated signaling in glutamatergic neurons was assessed using neuronal Vglut2+/IL-1R1−/− mice. RSD-induced neuronal reactivity (pCREB) in the hippocampus and enhancement in fear memory were dependent on neuronal IL-1R1 signaling. Furthermore, single-nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) showed that RSD influenced transcription in specific hippocampal neurons (DG neurons, CA2/3, CA1 neurons) associated with glutamate signaling, inflammation and synaptic plasticity, which were neuronal IL-1R1-dependent. Furthermore, snRNAseq data provided evidence that RSD increased CREB, BDNF, and calcium signaling in DG neurons in an IL-1R1-dependent manner. Collectively, increased IL-1R1-mediated signaling (monocytes/microglia independent) in glutamatergic neurons after RSD enhanced neuronal reactivity and fear memory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Psychosocial stress is associated with increased anxiety and depression [1]. Chronic or traumatic stressors are linked with stress-sensitization, which is represented by an enhanced vulnerability and reactivity to subsequent stressors [2, 3]. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a manifestation of stress-sensitization and affects about 6% of the US population [4]. Repeated social defeat (RSD) in mice promotes the convergence of neuronal, central inflammatory, and peripheral immune pathways causing prolonged anxiety, social avoidance, and stress-sensitization [5,6,7]. Stress-sensitization after RSD persists 24–30 days later [5,6,7] and results in amplified responses to RSD re-exposure promoting inflammation, neuronal reactivity, and behavioral deficits (e.g., anxiety, social-withdrawal, cognitive-impairment) [8]. This enhanced stress reactivity after RSD is clinically relevant and shares key elements with PTSD [8].
A notable feature of this stress-sensitization is that anxiety recurs with re-exposure to acute defeat (1 day of RSD). By 24 days, stress-associated anxiety, splenomegaly, circulating cytokines, myelopoiesis, and monocyte accumulation in the brain has resolved. Nonetheless, several indices of sensitization persist at 24 days including social avoidance of an aggressive intruder [5], altered transcriptional profiles of microglia [7] and an increased reservoir of monocytes in the spleen [9]. Stress-sensitization is associated with the recurrence of inflammatory Ly6Chi monocytes in circulation and in the brain, neuroinflammation, and anxiety in the open-field with RSD re-exposure [5,6,7, 10]. In the hippocampus, dentate gyrus (DG) neurons from stress-sensitized mice have functional differences with re-exposure to stress at D24 (acute defeat) with increased neuronal phospho-cAMP-response element binding protein (pCREB) induction compared to naïve mice [7]. While our work has focused on microglia, monocyte, and endothelia interactions in stress-induced anxiety [11,12,13,14], the goal of this study was to understand the influence of social defeat on hippocampal neurons in the context of enhanced fear memory.
Stress induces neuronal activation within regions of fear and threat appraisal in the brain (e.g., pre-frontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala) [12, 13, 15]. Neurons from these regions in stress-sensitized mice have functional differences with re-exposure to stress at 24 days with increased pCREB induction compared to naïve controls [7, 10]. Increased expression of pCREB is implicated in learning-induced synaptic plasticity and may indicate increased neuronal reactivity to threatening stimuli [10, 16, 17]. This is clinically relevant because individuals diagnosed with PTSD have abnormal neuronal transmission associated with an overactive amygdala and reduction in hippocampus volume [18, 19]. Consistent with neuronal sensitization, the interpretation of fear was enhanced after RSD [20]. For example, mice had enhanced contextual fear memory (hippocampal-dependent) 8 days after RSD. Thus, stress causes sensitization in neurons, especially in the hippocampus, resulting in exaggerated responses to subthreshold stressors.
Stress-induced IL-1 signaling uses endothelial IL-1 receptor-1 (IL-1R1) and neuronal IL-1R1 [21]. Microglia/monocyte signaling to endothelia IL-1R1 elicits anxiety-like behavior [12, 14, 22] and neuronal IL-1R1 mediates social withdrawal and cognitive impairment [23]. While myeloid cells release IL-1β with stress, other cells in the CNS may also produce IL-1β. Even a low level of IL-1 release has a profound effect on neurons [24]. This is because IL-1R1 and corresponding accessory proteins are expressed on neurons in the cortex, hippocampus, and brainstem [21, 25]. Both IL-1β and IL-1 receptor antagonist (RA) bind to IL-1R1 [26, 27]. Moreover, there is robust IL-1R1 expression on excitatory glutamatergic (Vglut2+) neurons of the hippocampus [21, 23]. As such, IL-1 activation increases glutamate signaling in the brain [28]. IL-1 signaling in neurons, especially DG (Vglut2+) neurons, has an important role in the sensitization and re-activation of neurons during stress re-exposure to promote fear memory. Blockade of neuronal IL-1R1 signaling prevented key neuronal aspects in the establishment of stress-sensitization [10]. Additionally, pCREB reactivity and acute cognitive impairments were evident after acute defeat in stress-sensitized mice, but social withdrawal was blocked by IL-1RA [10]. Thus, neuronal IL-1R1 plays an important role in sensitizing neurons following RSD.
Our recent data indicate neuronal sensitization involved increased IL-1R1 signaling specifically in excitatory neurons of the hippocampus [10, 23]. Thus, the goal here was to investigate the influence of stress on hippocampal neurons in the context of enhanced fear memory and determine the degree to which microglia and IL-1R1 pathways were involved. Here we show novel data that cell and region-specific IL-1 (Vglut2+/IL-1R1) signaling mediated fear memory following RSD. Additionally, snRNAseq demonstrated that stress-induced pathways associated with neuronal transmission and synaptic plasticity, dependent on neuronal IL-1R1.
Methods
Mice
Male C57BL/6 (5–7 weeks) and CD-1 aggressors were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. IL-1R1+/+ (Cre−) and Vglut2+/IL-1R1−/− (Cre+) mouse lines were bred in-house as described [29,30,31,32]. All procedures were in accordance with NIH Guidelines and the OSU Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee.
Repeated social defeat (RSD)
Mice were subjected to RSD as described [15]. In brief, a male CD-1 aggressor mouse was placed into the home cage of experimental mice (3 male mice/cage) for 2 h (16:00–18:00) per night for six consecutive nights. Control mice were left undisturbed.
Plexxikon(PLX)-5622
PLX5622 was formulated in AIN-76A rodent chow (1200 mg/kg) [33]. Standard AIN-76A diet was provided as vehicle. PLX5622 or vehicle diets were provided for 7 days to deplete microglia prior to RSD [34].
Fear conditioning
For the acquisition trial, mice were habituated for 90 s followed by a 30 s (2000 Hz, 70 db) tone. A 0.5 mA shock co-terminated during the last 2 s. The tone/shock was repeated five times (30 s inter-trial-interval (ITI)). For the contextual trial (24 h later), mice were habituated in the behavioral suite for 45 min then percent freezing was recorded for 10 min (context A) [35]. For the cued trial (24 h later), mice were habituated for 90 s in a new context (context B) with checkered floors/walls and banana extract. A tone played five times (30 s ITIs). % freezing during the tones was quantified. Each cohort was randomized, and experimenters were blinded to the treatments. Data were analyzed using Fusion software.
PCREB, IBA1, and CD45 detection
Immunohistochemical analyses were completed as described [36]. In brief, brains were post-fixed, cryoprotected, and sectioned (30 µm). Sections were washed, blocked, and incubated with primary antibodies: anti-CD45, anti-IBA1, or anti-pCREB overnight. Separate sections were used for each label. Next, sections were washed and incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies. Sections were washed, mounted on slides, and imaged using an EVOS M7000 system. pCREB sections were counterstained with DAPI. Percent area or mean fluorescent intensity were assessed using ImageJ. Experimenters were blinded to the treatments during image capture and analysis.
RNA isolation and qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from the hippocampus using Tri-Reagent and cDNA was generated from the High-Capacity Reverse Transcription Kit. Quantitative real-time PCR was completed with TaqMan Gene Expression assay. Fluorescence was determined using QuantStudio3 Real-Time PCR System.
In situ hybridization of IL-1β
RNAscope was performed as described [37]. In brief, sections were washed, heated, post-fixed, and dehydrated in ethanol. Antigens were retrieved with H2O2. Next, sections were treated with Protease-III for 30 min followed by IL-1β-C1 probe hybridization. Probe Amplification was completed, and signal was developed with Opal-690 dye. Images were captured using a Leica SP8 confocal (63X). Percent area of IL-1β RNA was quantified using ImageJ. With ×63 magnification only the granule cell layer of the DG was quantified. Experimenters were blinded to the treatments during each step.
Nuclei isolation
Hippocampi (n = 3) were extracted and pooled. Pooled samples were homogenized to release nuclei and incubated with Myelin Removal Beads-II. Samples were filtered through LS columns, clarified, and washed. Nuclei were counted, fixed with a Nuclei Fixation Kit (Parse Biosciences), and frozen at −80 °C.
Single-nuclei barcoding/sub-library generation
Parse Biosciences Whole Transcription Kit was used to barcode and generate sub-libraries with 12,500 nuclei/sub-library comprised of all samples. The resulting cDNA was sequenced at 40,000 reads/nuclei using a NovaSeq S4.
Data processing
Fastq.gz files were aligned to Genome Reference Consortium Mouse Reference 39 using the Parse Biosciences pipeline. Matrices were filtered in RStudio using Seurat (v4.1.1) [38]. Nuclei with >20% mitochondrial DNA were excluded. After clustering, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), annotation was performed using established markers [34, 39,40,41,42,43]. Syt1+ neurons were subclustered and differential gene expression was performed using the FindMarkers with Model-based Analysis of Single-cell Transcriptomics (MAST) [44]. Pathway, regulators, and gene ontology (GO) analyses were performed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA;Qiagen) [45] and Metascape [46].
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed GraphPad Prism 9 with T-tests (two-sided) or two-way ANOVAs to determine main effects and interactions. Tukey HSD was used for post hoc analysis when main effects or interactions were significant.
Results
Stress enhanced fear memory acutely and chronically
RSD causes sensitization of neurons [29]. The mechanisms underlying stress-sensitization are unclear, but enhanced fear memory may be critical. Therefore, we aimed to determine the influence of microglia and neuronal IL-1R1 signaling in the development of stress-sensitization and RSD-induced fear memory. We assessed if stress influenced fear memory acutely (D7) and chronically (D28) using a fear conditioning paradigm (Fig. 1A, B). First, we confirmed there were no differences in total percent freezing between control and stress without the shock at D7 (Fig. 1C) or D28 (Fig. 1D).
Next, we assessed if stress influenced fear memory acutely (D7) using cohort 1. During acquisition (D7), there was a main effect of stress on the percent freezing (F(1,96) = 33.1, p < 0.001; Fig. 1E). Post hoc analysis confirmed that stress increased freezing compared to controls at several timepoints (p < 0.05). Moreover, stress increased percent total freezing during fear acquisition (p < 0.05, Fig. 1H). During the contextual trial (D8), there was a main effect of stress on the percent freezing (F(1,80) = 15.97, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1F). Post hoc analysis confirmed that stress increased freezing compared to controls at several timepoints (p < 0.05). Moreover, the percent total freezing during contextual fear (D8) was highest in the stress group (p < 0.0001; Fig. 1H). There were modest effects of stress during the cued trial (D9). Total percent freezing tended to be highest in the stress group compared to all other groups (p = 0.1; Fig. 1G, H).
Fear conditioning was next assessed on D28 (22 days after RSD) in cohort 2. There was no effect of stress on acquisition on D28 (Fig. 1I, L). Notably, the total percent freezing during acquisition (D28) was lower than non-shocked mice in Fig. 1D. Nonetheless different mice were used for Fig. 1D, L. During the contextual trial (D29), there was a main effect of stress on percent freezing (F(1,130) = 15.95, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1J). Post hoc analysis confirmed that stress increased freezing during the contextual trial compared to controls at several timepoints (p < 0.05). Moreover, the percent total percent freezing during the contextual fear trial (D29) was highest in the stress group (p < 0.05; Fig. 1L). For cued fear (Fig. 1K, L), only percent freezing during the tone presentation is shown. There were limited effects of stress during cued fear (D30) (Fig. 1K). The total percent cued freezing tended to be highest in the stress group compared to controls (p = 0.1; Fig. 1K). Collectively, stress enhanced fear memory acutely and contextual fear memory persisted weeks later.
Stress-induced fear memory, pCREB activation and IL-1β expression in the hippocampus were microglia independent
Microglia activation, monocyte recruitment, and IL-1 expression are key elements in stress-induced anxiety in mice [6]. To assess the role of microglia/monocytes in enhanced fear memory, mice were administered vehicle or CSFR1 antagonist (PLX5622) diet to deplete microglia 1 week prior to RSD. These mice were maintained on experimental diets for the study duration. Fear conditioning was assessed on D7-9 and samples were collected for analyses following cued fear on D9 (Fig. 2A).
As expected, stress increased the percent freezing (F(3,672) = 38.4, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2B) and total percent freezing (F(1,56) = 21.6, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2C) during acquisition (D7). This effect of stress, however, was independent of microglia depletion. For contextual fear conditioning (D8), stress increased percent freezing (F(3,430) = 13.2, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2D) and total percent freezing (F(1,44) = 4.5, p < 0.04; Fig. 2E). These effects were independent of microglia depletion. During cued fear (D9), stress increased percent freezing (F(3,210) = 9.1, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2F) and total percent freezing (F(1,44) = 12.4, p < 0.002; Fig. 2G). These effects on cued fear memory were independent of microglia depletion. Thus, fear memory after stress was independent of monocytes/microglia.
Stress-sensitization after RSD is associated with neuronal reactivity with enhanced pCREB activation in the pre-frontal cortex and hippocampus after exposure to an acute stressor [7, 29]. In this design, the acute stressor is exposure to fear conditioning. Here, the influence of stress and PLX5622 on pCREB activation was assessed in the DG granule layer immediately after cued fear testing (D9). pCREB was increased by stress (F(1,12) = 6.7, p < 0.03, Fig. 2I, J) and post hoc analysis (p < 0.05) confirmed that the highest pCREB activation was in stress-sensitized mice exposed to fear conditioning (Stress-Veh and Stress-PLX). Moreover, this increased pCREB in the hippocampus in stress-sensitized mice was independent of microglia. Thus, enhanced pCREB activation in the hippocampus with stress-sensitization was microglia/monocyte independent.
Next, the influence of RSD and PLX5622 on IL-1β RNA, microglial proportional area (IBA1+), monocyte accumulation (CD45+ cells) was determined in the hippocampus after RSD and fear conditioning (D9). First, IL-1β RNA was increased in the hippocampus after stress. This increase was unaffected by microglia depletion (F(1,43) = 18.98, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2H). PLX5622 reduced IBA1+ % area in the hippocampus (F(1,19) = 41.73, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2K, L). These data are consistent with microglia depletion. Stress also increased % area of IBA1+ in the hippocampus (F(1,19) = 166.9, p < 0.0001). CD45+ cells (monocytes) were increased after stress (F(1,18) = 43.0, p < 0.0001) and was prevented by microglia depletion (F(1,18) = 10.3, p < 0.005, Fig. 2M, N). These data are consistent with previous RSD studies of microglia depletion [7, 12].
In a separate study, the influence of stress and PLX5622 on IL-1β RNA in the DG was assessed by RNAscope 14 h after RSD. Stress increased IL-1β RNA in the DG (F(1,11) = 37.3, p < 0.0001), but same as above, it was independent of microglia (Fig. 2O, P). Thus, increased IL-1β RNA after RSD in the DG was monocyte/microglia independent.
Stress-induced fear memory and pCREB activation in the hippocampus were dependent on neuronal IL-1R1
We show that enhanced fear memory after RSD was microglia/monocyte independent, but still associated with increased IL-1β RNA in the hippocampus/DG. This is relevant because IL-1R1 is highly expressed on excitatory neurons in the DG [30] and this pathway is important for stress-sensitization [29, 47]. Our lab and others have used pCREB labeling to assess neuronal re-activity to secondary stressors after mice have been stress sensitized by RSD [7, 48]. Thus, neuronal Vglut2+/IL-1R1−/− (nIL-1R1−/−) mice were used to determine if enhanced fear memory following RSD was dependent on IL-1 receptor signaling in hippocampal excitatory neurons. Fear conditioning was assessed on D7–9 after RSD and samples were collected for analyses following cued fear on D9 (Fig. 3A).
Fear conditioning was assessed in IL-1R1+/+ and nIL-1R1−/− mice acutely (D7–9). As in Fig. 1, stress increased the percent total freezing during acquisition (F(1,42) = 15.19, p < 0.0001), context (F(1,31) = 4.624, p < 0.05) and cued (F(1,27) = 6.03, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3B–G). These enhancements were influenced by neuronal IL-1R1 signaling. For instance, stress increased percent freezing (F(3,502) = 16.30, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3B) and total percent freezing (F(1,42) = 15.19, p < 0.05; Fig. 3C) during acquisition (D7) which was nIL-1R1 dependent. Post hoc analysis confirmed that percent total freezing was highest in Stress-IL-1R1+/+ mice compared to all other groups including Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice (p < 0.05, Fig. 3C). This interaction was also evident (F(3,280) = 19.53, p < 0.0001) during context fear (D8). The effects of stress on the percent total freezing (F(1, 31) = 7.2, p < 0.05; Fig. 3D) were dependent on nIL-1R1. Post hoc analysis confirmed that the Stress-IL-1R1+/+ group had the highest total percent freezing compared to all other groups (p < 0.05; Fig. 3D). During cued fear (D9), stress increased the percent total freezing (F(3,140) = 8.9, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3F) and total percent freezing (F(1,27) = 6.03, p < 0.05; Fig. 3G). Post hoc analysis confirmed that Stress-IL-1R1+/+ was increased compared to all other groups (p < 0.05). Together, stress enhanced fear memory via neuronal IL-1R1 signaling in the DG.
Next, the influence of RSD, fear conditioning, and nIL-1R1 on IL-1β RNA, pCREB+ activation, IBA1+ proportional area, and monocyte accumulation (CD45+) were determined in the hippocampus. As expected, stress increased IL-1β RNA levels in the hippocampus (F(1,25) = 9.5, p < 0.006; Fig. 3H) independent of IL-1R1 signaling. RSD-induced pCREB in DG (F(1,14) = 6.7, p < 0.03 Fig. 3H, I) and this increase was dependent on nIL-1R1 (F(1,14) = 19.9, p < 0.001; Fig. 3H, I). The Stress-IL-1R1+/+ group had the highest levels of pCREB compared to all other groups including the Stress-nIL-1R1−/− group (p < 0.05). IBA1+ proportional area (F(1,16) = 10.5, p < 0.005; Fig. 3K, L) and number of CD45+ monocytes (F(1,20) = 75.9, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3M, N) were increased after RSD independent of nIL-1R1 [47]. Collectively, IL-1R1 signaling in Vglut2+ neurons mediated the stress-induced enhancement in fear memory and pCREB+ activation in the hippocampus.
Stress and nIL-1R1 knockout influence single-nuclei RNAseq clustering and profiles
We show that stress enhanced fear memory and pCREB activation in the hippocampus, dependent on IL-1R1, but microglia/monocyte independent. To determine transcriptional profiles of neurons in the hippocampus influenced by stress that may underlie enhanced fear responses, single-nuclei RNAseq (snRNAseq) was used. snRNAseq was used because nuclei isolation overrepresents neurons compared to other cells (Supplementary Fig. 1). This is evident consistently across different labs, and publications [43, 49,50,51]. Overall, snRNAseq provided excellent resolution of neuronal subpopulations in the hippocampus.
Here, IL-1R1+/+ and nIL-1R1−/− mice were subjected to RSD and nuclei were isolated 14 h later (Fig. 4A). While different cell types were identified by snRNAseq (Supplementary Fig. 1), our focus was on neuronal profiles. Thus, neuronal nuclei (Syt1+) were subclustered for analysis. Figure 4B shows unsupervised UMAP clustering from 21,792 neurons (5000–6000 neurons/group). Nineteen clusters were identified with each condition represented. Figure 4C, D shows identities based on previous reports [39, 40] and ConservedMarkers (Seurat). Figure 4E highlights the distribution of clusters within each group. The DG clusters (NC16&17) had shifted distribution based on genotype and stress. Figure 4F shows the percentage of each cluster in INH, DG, and CA1 neurons for each group. Cluster distribution was determined via UMAP function (Seurat). Cluster distribution was influenced by stress for the DG and CA1 clusters (Fig. 4F). For instance, stress increased cluster percentage of DG N16 compared to controls (70% vs. 37%) and stress decreased CA1 N11 compared to controls (20% vs. 37%).
Stress induced unique transcriptional patterns in hippocampal neurons that were dependent on neuronal IL-1R1 signaling
Using the snRNAseq data, Fig. 5A shows counts of Il1r1 in INH, CA1, CA2/3 and DG neurons in the hippocampus. In total, 75% of Il1r1 counts were in Prox1+ granule neurons (Fig. 5B). Additionally, there were increased Il1r1 counts in the DG after RSD compared to controls. These increases were attenuated in the Stress-nIL-1R1−/− group. These data confirm IL-1R1 expression in DG neurons and reduction of IL-1R1 in the nIL-1R1−/−.
Next, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained from INH (NC1,2,&12), CA1 (NC4–6&9–10), CA2/3 (NC18&19) and DG neurons (NC 16&17) using FindMarkers (Seurat). Figure 5C depicts the DEGs influenced by RSD in INH neurons in which 69% (573 DEGs) were reversed in the Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice compared to Stress-IL-1R1+/+ mice. For CA1 neurons, 85% (1452 DEGs) of the RSD induced genes were reversed in the Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice. For CA2/CA3 neurons, 98% (618 DEGs) of the stress-induced genes were reversed in Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice. For DG neurons, 66% (197 DEGs) were reversed in the nIL-1R1−/− mice (Fig. 5A). Thus, nIL-1R1 mediates neuronal transcriptome changes in each neuronal type of the hippocampus following RSD.
The DEGs reversed by nIL-1R1−/− were used in GO (Metascape) [46]. In INH neurons, RSD influenced genes associated with chromatin remodeling, histone modification, and synaptic signaling (padj. < 0.05). These increases were reversed in Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice (Fig. 5D). In DG neurons, stress influenced genes associated with synapse organization, cell morphogenesis, and negative regulation of cell projection, which all were reversed in Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice (Fig. 5E). In CA2/3 neurons, stress influenced genes associated with Ras signaling, insulin response, Wnt signaling, and cell morphogenesis (padj. < 0.05, Fig. 5F). These stress influences were reversed in Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice (padj. < 0.05, Fig. 5D). In CA1 neurons stress influenced genes associated with glutamatergic signaling, learning and memory, and neuron projection development (padj. < 0.05). These increases were reversed in Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice (padj. < 0.05, Fig. 5G). Thus, increased neuronal IL-1 signaling after RSD influences distinct pathways (direct/indirect) in specific neurons of the hippocampus.
Stress induced unique canonical pathways, regulators, and cell-to-cell communication in hippocampal neurons dependent on nIL-1R1 signaling
Next, DEGs that were influenced by stress and reversed in Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice were used in IPA. Pathways with the highest (+) and lowest (−) z-score were selected in each neuronal subtype (Fig. 6A). Several inflammatory-related pathways were increased in different classes of neurons, including NF-κB, NFAT, GPCR, and integrin signaling. These increases were prevented by nIL-1R1−/−. These data are consistent with a previously published using bulk-RNAseq [47]. Notably, INH and CA1 neurons had reduced pathways of neuronal activation or synaptic strength (CREB signaling, calcium signaling, and protein kinase A signaling). DG neurons had increased CREB signaling and was prevented in nIL-1R1−/− mice (Fig. 6A). This is consistent with hippocampal pCREB labeling (Fig. 3H).
Next, regulators with the highest (+) and lowest (−) z-score were selected. Again, stress induced several inflammatory pathways that were nIL-1R1 dependent (Fig. 6B–E). In the INH neurons, several regulators of inflammation were increased by stress and dependent on nIL-1R1 signaling (NFKBIA, IL18, and IL10RA). There was a decrease in regulators of neuronal function/activation (brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and CREB1) and DNA modification (SATB1 and DICER1). In the DG neurons, several regulators related to fear memory were increased by stress and were dependent on nIL-1R1, including KCND2 and BDNF [52, 53]. There was reduced CREB1 in the Stress-nIL-1R1−/−, consistent with pCREB labeling (Fig. 3H) and IPA pathways (Fig. 6A). In the CA2/CA3 neurons, several regulators of inflammation were increased by stress and were dependent on nIL-1R1 signaling, including PPARD and IL15. Meanwhile, regulators of neuronal activation (ADORA2A and GRIN3A) and DNA modification (KDM5B and KMT2D) were reduced. In CA2/CA3 neurons, several regulators of inflammation were increased by stress and were dependent on nIL-1R1 signaling (IKBKB and NR3C2). Meanwhile, RSD decreased regulators of synaptic complexity (YAP1 and MMP3) and TGF-β pathways (SMAD4 and TGFB1). Collectively, stress-induced alterations to neuronal subpopulations regulating pathways related to neuronal activation and inflammation.
Using cellchat, overexpressed pathways were obtained. Compared to Con-IL-1R1+/+, Stress-IL-1R1+/+ mice had increased neurotrophic signaling from the DG and CA1 (each color denotes a difference source). This signaling pathway was not enhanced in the nIL-1R1 groups (not shown). This is consistent with the stress-induced increase BDNF a regulator above, which was attenuated with the nIL-1R1−/− (Fig. 6F). Overall, stress induced myriad changes in hippocampal neurons that were mediated by neuronal IL-1 signaling.
Discussion
RSD causes sensitization in several cellular compartments including neurons [5]. Our previous studies indicate that neuronal Vglut2+/IL-1R1 was critical for stress-sensitization. Additionally, stress prolonged fear extinction, increased freezing during extinction recall, and increased IL-1β expression in the hippocampus following fear conditioning [20]. Novel aspects of this study were that stress-enhanced contextual fear memory persisted 29 days later. Moreover, the stress-enhanced fear memory and hippocampal pCREB activation were neuronal IL-1R1-dependent, but microglia/monocyte independent. Last, snRNAseq shows myriad stress-dependent influences on neuronal subpopulations in the hippocampus dependent on nIL-1R1. Overall, we provide new data that IL-1R1-mediated signaling (monocytes/microglia independent) in glutamatergic neurons after RSD enhanced neuronal reactivity and contextual fear memory. We provide a novel neuronal RNA signature in the hippocampus (single-nuclei level) that represents the IL-1R1-dependent influence of RSD. These RNA profiles in neurons, especially DG neurons, may represent the molecular basis of neuronal stress-sensitization and has relevance toward understanding the neurobiology of PTSD.
One interesting aspect of this study was that stress-induced enhancement of fear memory and neuronal reactivity with increased pCREB activation were independent of monocytes/microglia. Consistent with previous work, PLX5622 depleted microglia and reduced accumulation of CD45+ cells (monocytes) in the hippocampus after RSD [5, 54, 55]. Microglia depletion prior to RSD, however, had no effect on the stress-induced increase in contextual fear memory. Previous studies report that microglia depletion increased freezing during fear conditioning [56, 57]. For instance, using PLX3397, mice had increased freezing 35 days following fear acquisition. The authors interpreted these data to indicate that microglia mediated fear extinction or “forgetting” [56]. Thus, there may be memory effects of microglia depletion with PLX3397, which is a CSFR1 antagonist and c-kit inhibitor [58]. Nonetheless, microglia depletion with PLX5622 did not influence the response to stress and fear memory was still enhanced. Microglia depletion also did not reverse the stress induction in neuronal reactivity. Collectively we interpret these data to indicate that the stress-induced fear memory was independent of monocytes/microglia.
A key finding was that stress-induced enhancement of fear memory and neuronal reactivity with pCREB activation were dependent on neuronal IL-1R1. The involvement of IL-1R1 in stress-induced fear response is consistent with other studies reporting that IL-1β and IL-1R1 are associated with fear memory [59,60,61,62,63]. For instance, stress-enhanced fear learning (SEFL) increased IL-1β expression in the DG and treatment with IL-1RA prevented SEFL [59]. In a study of amyloid-β accumulation, global IL-1R1−/− reversed fear memory deficits. The novelty here is that we show these responses of IL-1R1 are specifically in Vglut2+ neurons, which are highly expressed in the DG of the hippocampus [23, 30]. There is evidence that Vglut2 is expressed on other regions at baseline [30]. Notably, nIL-1R1−/− did not affect microglia activation, monocyte recruitment, and IL-1β after RSD. This is consistent with previous RSD studies [29, 47]. Additionally, pCREB activation (i.e., neuronal reactivity) in the DG after stress and fear conditioning was independent of microglia/monocytes but was dependent on nIL-1R1. The use of pCREB to determine neuronal re-activity is based on our previous studies [7, 29]. Other studies have validated that pCREB is predominantly in the granule cell layer of the DG [48, 64,65,66]. While pCREB expression was not assessed 28 days following fear conditioning, our previous studies show pCREB expression was only increased in stress-sensitized mice that received an acute stress at 24 days [7]. These data are consistent with the pCREB in the hippocampus of mice exposed to RSD and then fear conditioning at D9. We interpret these data as increased pCREB in mature neurons, but it is plausible that pCREB in the subventricular zone is increased in newly formed neurons [64]. Previously, we did not detect an increase in neurogenesis in the hippocampus 14 h after RSD [67], but those mice were not exposed to fear conditioning. Thus, further studies are needed to confirm maturity of the pCREB+ neurons. Overall, these interpretations align with the snRNAseq data showing that CREB Signaling in DG neurons was increased after stress and was dependent on nIL-1R1 (Fig. 6A). In addition, the dorsal DG is critical for both the encoding and retrieving of fear memories. For example, optogenetic inhibition of the dorsal DG decreased freezing during acquisition [68]. Here, stress-enhanced contextual fear and neuronal reactivity was dependent on nIL-1R1. While nIL-1R1ko prevented enhanced fear memory at 7 days after RSD, it is unclear if nIL-1R1ko would also prevent enhanced pCREB reactivity and fear memory at 28 days. Based on our previous studies with nIL-1R1ko and stress-sensitization, we believe that neuronal IL-1R1 will have a key role. Nonetheless, we acknowledge there are other pathways that promote long-term sensitization in the context of fear conditioning, independent of neuronal IL-1R1. Collectively, we interpret these data to indicate that there was long-lasting sensitization of IL-1R1+ hippocampal neurons after RSD.
Another relevant finding was that stress-induced IL-1β RNA expression in the DG/hippocampus was independent of microglia/monocytes. While stress robustly increased IL-1β RNA in the hippocampus (RT-qPCR/RNAscope), it was unaffected by microglial depletion. Hippocampal IL-1β RNA was also unaffected by nIL-1R1−/−. Microglia and monocytes both express IL-1β after RSD [13, 67, 69] and communicate with endothelia to increase prostaglandins [14]. This pathway mediated anxiety in the open-field [14]. In coronal brain sections, RSD-induced IL-1β RNA was reduced by microglia depletion with PLX5622 [67]. This coronal section included several brain regions and was not specific to the DG/hippocampus [55]. Here, microglia depletion did not prevent IL-1β RNA expression in the DG/hippocampus after RSD. The interpretation is that non-myeloid cells may express IL-1β in the hippocampus. Based on location of the RNAscope labeling, neurons are likely expressing IL-1β. Thus, hippocampal IL-1R1 signaling is associated with neuronal sensitization, but the IL-1β in this region is not primarily from monocytes/microglia.
Relevant to neuronal sensitization after RSD, novel snRNAseq data revealed myriad stress-dependent influences on neuronal subpopulations (INH, CA1, CA2/3, and DG) that were dependent on nIL-1R1. As expected, DG neurons contained the highest percentage of Il1r1 and was decreased in the nIL-1R1−/− mice after RSD. These data support previous studies showing that IL-1R1 is highly expressed in the DG compared to other CNS regions [23, 29, 30] and that the Vglut2-Cre targets the hippocampus (Liu et al. [21]). Using GO, stress-influenced pathways associated with synaptic signaling (INH), glutamatergic signaling (CA1), learning and memory (CA1), synapse organization/cell morphogenesis (DG), and negative regulation of cell projection (DG). All these genes/pathways induced by stress were nIL-1R1 dependent. There were increases in pathways associated with neuroinflammation (NF-κB, T-Cell receptor signaling, CLEAR signaling) and were nIL-1R1 dependent. These data align with previous results of bulk-RNAseq of the hippocampus after RSD [47]. Also, INH transcriptome changes point to a disruption in the excitatory/inhibitory balance, which may alter spatial memory and fear behaviors [70,71,72]. Collectively, stress influenced the transcription of multiple neuronal subtypes in the hippocampus relating to synaptic plasticity and were nIL-1R1 dependent.
Another relevant finding was the influence of stress on the DG neurons. These are IL-1R1-expressing neurons. There was increased CREB signaling, estrogen-receptor (ER) signaling, synapse organization, cell morphogenesis, and calcium signaling after RSD. These stress-induced pathways were nIL-1R1-dependent. Data above and previous work has implicated each of these DG pathways in increased fear memory and synaptic plasticity [73]. A previous study showed ER signaling mediates hippocampal-based memory by interacting with metabotropic glutamate receptors and inducing CREB signaling in neurons [74]. When neuronal-derived 17β-estradiol was depleted, contextual fear extinction was decreased [75]. Thus, ER pathways are involved in contextual memory via glutamatergic and CREB signaling. There was also a decrease in Cdk5 signaling in the DG neurons after RSD (nIL-1R1-dependent). Cdk5 is associated with morphogenesis, synapse formation, and contextual memory [76]. Moreover, there was significant inhibition of stress responses in low IL-1R1-expressing neurons with nIL-1R1−/− including INH, CA1, and CA2/3 neurons. As noted, IL-1R1 is highly expressed on granule cells of the DG. These DG neurons receive input from many sources and relay signals to the CA2/3 and CA1 [77]. Thus, preventing IL-1R1 signaling in DG neurons had profound downstream effects on the CA2/CA3, CA1, and INH neurons. Collectively, these IL-1R1 dependent pathways are critical in the sensitization of DG neurons after RSD.
snRNAseq revealed that stress uniquely altered pathways associated with increased glutamate signaling, synaptic plasticity, and long-term potentiation/depression (LTP/LTD) in the CA1 neurons. The influence of stress on CA1 neurons is likely downstream to the sensitization of the DG neurons. CA1 neurons increased glutamate signaling, synaptic LTD, and adrenergic signaling. Additionally, there was stress-induced decreases in FAK and PKA signaling, which are associated with neuronal transmission and neurotransmitter release [78, 79]. GO showed changes in the CA1 associated with learning and memory, and neuronal projection development. This aligns with previous data demonstrating that nIL-1R1−/− prevented y-maze deficits after RSD [47], dependent on CA1 activity [80, 81]. Also, BDNF signaling was increased in DG neurons, and it was augmented in cell-to-cell signaling via CellChat. These effects of stress were absent in the Stress-nIL-1R1−/− mice. These data are consistent with studies showing that fear conditioning acquisition and recall were associated with increased BDNF in the hippocampus [82]. Specifically, increased hippocampal BDNF was associated with increased contextual fear [52, 83]. Other reports using restraint and chronic mild stress, showed decreased hippocampal BDNF. Nonetheless, these reports only assessed global Bdnf mRNA or protein in the hippocampus [84, 85]. Here, neuron subpopulations were evaluated after RSD and BDNF signaling was increased in DG neurons and decreased in INH of the hippocampus. Thus, BDNF and related genes were selectively affected by stress in hippocampal neurons. Furthermore, we provide evidence that increased BDNF-associated pathways in the DG were nIL-1R1 dependent. Thus, stress enhanced neurotrophic signaling in the DG and could be a key component of neuronal sensitization and enhanced fear memory after RSD.
In conclusion, neuronal IL-1R1 signaling has a critical role in mediating enhanced fear memory after RSD. Here, neuronal IL-1R1 knockout prevented stress-induced fear memory and neuronal activation in the hippocampus. Additionally, neuronal transcriptome changes across the hippocampus after RSD were dependent on neuronal IL-1R1 signaling. Although fear conditioning involves a complex network, we identified IL-1R1 signaling in Vglut2+ neurons as basis of sensitization of DG neurons and the mechanism by which there is enhanced fear memory after RSD.
Data availability
The single-nuclei data discussed have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE253687.
Code availability
Code is available upon request.
References
Kendler KS, Hettema JM, Butera F, Gardner CO, Prescott CA. Life event dimensions of loss, humiliation, entrapment, and danger in the prediction of onsets of major depression and generalized anxiety. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:789–96.
McLaughlin KA, Conron KJ, Koenen KC, Gilman SE. Childhood adversity, adult stressful life events, and risk of past-year psychiatric disorder: a test of the stress sensitization hypothesis in a population-based sample of adults. Psychol Med. 2010;40:1647–58.
Stroud CB, Davila J, Hammen C, Vrshek-Schallhorn S. Severe and nonsevere events in first onsets versus recurrences of depression: evidence for stress sensitization. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011;120:142–54.
Jacob SN, Dodge CP, Vasterling JJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder and neurocognition: a bidirectional relationship? Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;72:101747.
Wohleb ES, McKim DB, Shea DT, Powell ND, Tarr AJ, Sheridan JF, et al. Re-establishment of anxiety in stress-sensitized mice is caused by monocyte trafficking from the spleen to the brain. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75:970–81.
McKim DB, Patterson JM, Wohleb ES, Jarrett BL, Reader BF, Godbout JP, et al. Sympathetic release of splenic monocytes promotes recurring anxiety following repeated social defeat. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:803–13.
Weber MD, McKim DB, Niraula A, Witcher KG, Yin WY, Sobol CG, et al. The influence of microglial elimination and repopulation on stress sensitization induced by repeated social defeat. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85:667–78.
Biltz RG, Sawicki CM, Sheridan JF, Godbout JP. The neuroimmunology of social-stress-induced sensitization. Nat Immunol. 2022;23:1527–35.
McKim DB, Yin W, Wang Y, Cole SW, Godbout JP, Sheridan JF. Social stress mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells to establish persistent splenic myelopoiesis. Cell Rep. 2018;25:2552–62.e3.
DiSabato DJ, Yin W, Biltz RG, Gallagher NR, Oliver B, Nemeth DP, et al. IL-1 receptor-1 on Vglut2 (+) neurons in the hippocampus is critical for neuronal and behavioral sensitization after repeated social stress. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2022;26:100547.
Niraula A, Witcher KG, Sheridan JF, Godbout JP. Interleukin-6 induced by social stress promotes a unique transcriptional signature in the monocytes that facilitate anxiety. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85:679–89.
McKim DB, Weber MD, Niraula A, Sawicki CM, Liu X, Jarrett BL, et al. Microglial recruitment of IL-1beta-producing monocytes to brain endothelium causes stress-induced anxiety. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1421–31.
Wohleb ES, Powell ND, Godbout JP, Sheridan JF. Stress-induced recruitment of bone marrow-derived monocytes to the brain promotes anxiety-like behavior. J Neurosci. 2013;33:13820–33.
Yin W, Biltz R, Goodman E, Gallagher NR, Swanson S, Sheridan JF, et al. Unique brain endothelial profiles activated by social stress promote cell adhesion, prostaglandin E2 signaling, HPA axis modulation, and anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47:2271–82.
Wohleb ES, Hanke ML, Corona AW, Powell ND, La’Tonia MS, Bailey MT, et al. β-Adrenergic receptor antagonism prevents anxiety-like behavior and microglial reactivity induced by repeated social defeat. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6277–88.
Kivinummi T, Kaste K, Rantamaki T, Castren E, Ahtee L. Alterations in BDNF and phospho-CREB levels following chronic oral nicotine treatment and its withdrawal in dopaminergic brain areas of mice. Neurosci Lett. 2011;491:108–12.
Tropea TF, Kosofsky BE, Rajadhyaksha AM. Enhanced CREB and DARPP-32 phosphorylation in the nucleus accumbens and CREB, ERK, and GluR1 phosphorylation in the dorsal hippocampus is associated with cocaine-conditioned place preference behavior. J Neurochem. 2008;106:1780–90.
Logue MW, van Rooij SJH, Dennis EL, Davis SL, Hayes JP, Stevens JS, et al. Smaller hippocampal volume in posttraumatic stress disorder: a multisite ENIGMA-PGC study: subcortical volumetry results from posttraumatic stress disorder consortia. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;83:244–53.
Badura-Brack A, McDermott TJ, Heinrichs-Graham E, Ryan TJ, Khanna MM, Pine DS, et al. Veterans with PTSD demonstrate amygdala hyperactivity while viewing threatening faces: a MEG study. Biol Psychol. 2018;132:228–32.
Lisboa SF, Niraula A, Resstel LB, Guimaraes FS, Godbout JP, Sheridan JF. Repeated social defeat-induced neuroinflammation, anxiety-like behavior and resistance to fear extinction were attenuated by the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:1924–33.
Liu X, Nemeth DP, McKim DB, Zhu L, DiSabato DJ, Berdysz O, et al. Cell-type-specific interleukin 1 receptor 1 signaling in the brain regulates distinct neuroimmune activities. Immunity. 2019;50:764–6.
Wohleb ES, Patterson JM, Sharma V, Quan N, Godbout JP, Sheridan JF. Knockdown of interleukin-1 receptor type-1 on endothelial cells attenuated stress-induced neuroinflammation and prevented anxiety-like behavior. J Neurosci. 2014;34:2583–91.
DiSabato DJ, Nemeth DP, Liu X, Witcher KG, O’Neil SM, Oliver B, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor on hippocampal neurons drives social withdrawal and cognitive deficits after chronic social stress. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:4770–82.
Huang Y, Smith DE, Ibanez-Sandoval O, Sims JE, Friedman WJ. Neuron-specific effects of interleukin-1beta are mediated by a novel isoform of the IL-1 receptor accessory protein. J Neurosci. 2011;31:18048–59.
Prieto GA, Snigdha S, Baglietto-Vargas D, Smith ED, Berchtold NC, Tong L, et al. Synapse-specific IL-1 receptor subunit reconfiguration augments vulnerability to IL-1beta in the aged hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E5078–87.
Symons JA, Young PR, Duff GW. Soluble type II interleukin 1 (IL-1) receptor binds and blocks processing of IL-1 beta precursor and loses affinity for IL-1 receptor antagonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:1714–8.
Newell EA, Todd BP, Mahoney J, Pieper AA, Ferguson PJ, Bassuk AG. Combined blockade of interleukin-1alpha and -1beta signaling protects mice from cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. eNeuro. 2018;5:ENEURO.0385-17.2018.
Casamenti F, Prosperi C, Scali C, Giovannelli L, Colivicchi MA, Faussone-Pellegrini MS, et al. Interleukin-1beta activates forebrain glial cells and increases nitric oxide production and cortical glutamate and GABA release in vivo: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience. 1999;91:831–42.
DiSabato DJ, Yin W, Biltz RG, Gallagher NR, Oliver B, Nemeth DP, et al. IL-1 Receptor-1 on Vglut2+ neurons in the hippocampus is critical for neuronal and behavioral sensitization after repeated social stress. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2022;26:100547.
Liu X, Nemeth DP, McKim DB, Zhu L, DiSabato DJ, Berdysz O, et al. Cell-type-specific interleukin 1 receptor 1 signaling in the brain regulates distinct neuroimmune activities. Immunity. 2019;50:317–33.e16.
Liu X, Yamashita T, Chen Q, Belevych N, McKim DB, Tarr AJ, et al. Interleukin 1 type 1 receptor restore: a genetic mouse model for studying interleukin 1 receptor-mediated effects in specific cell types. J Neurosci. 2015;35:2860–70.
Robson MJ, Zhu C-B, Quinlan MA, Botschner DA, Baganz NL, Lindler KM, et al. Generation and characterization of mice expressing a conditional allele of the interleukin-1 receptor type 1. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150068.
Spangenberg E, Severson PL, Hohsfield LA, Crapser J, Zhang J, Burton EA, et al. Sustained microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor impairs parenchymal plaque development in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3758.
Witcher KG, Bray CE, Chunchai T, Zhao F, O’Neil SM, Gordillo AJ, et al. Traumatic brain injury causes chronic cortical inflammation and neuronal dysfunction mediated by microglia. J Neurosci. 2021;41:1597–616.
Curzon P, Rustay NR, Browman KE. Cued and contextual fear conditioning for rodents. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2009.
Yin W, Gallagher NR, Sawicki CM, McKim DB, Godbout JP, Sheridan JF. Repeated social defeat in female mice induces anxiety-like behavior associated with enhanced myelopoiesis and increased monocyte accumulation in the brain. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;78:131–42.
Yin W, Swanson SP, Biltz RG, Goodman EJ, Gallagher NR, Sheridan JF, et al. Unique brain endothelial profiles activated by social stress promote cell adhesion, prostaglandin E2 signaling, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis modulation, and anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47:2271–82.
Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184:3573–87.e29.
O’Neil SM, Hans EE, Jiang S, Wangler LM, Godbout JP. Astrocyte immunosenescence and deficits in interleukin 10 signaling in the aged brain disrupt the regulation of microglia following innate immune activation. Glia. 2022;70:913–34.
Zhong S, Wang M, Zhan Y, Zhang J, Yang X, Fu S, et al. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing reveals transcriptional changes of hippocampal neurons in APP23 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020;84:919–26.
Kalinina A, Lagace D. Single-cell and single-nucleus RNAseq analysis of adult neurogenesis. Cells. 2022;11:1633.
Franjic D, Skarica M, Ma S, Arellano JI, Tebbenkamp ATN, Choi J, et al. Transcriptomic taxonomy and neurogenic trajectories of adult human, macaque, and pig hippocampal and entorhinal cells. Neuron. 2022;110:452–69.e14.
Rosenberg AB, Roco CM, Muscat RA, Kuchina A, Sample P, Yao Z, et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science. 2018;360:176–82.
Finak G, McDavid A, Yajima M, Deng J, Gersuk V, Shalek AK, et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2015;16:1–13.
Kramer A, Green J, Pollard J Jr., Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:523–30.
Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, Chang M, Khodabakhshi AH, Tanaseichuk O, et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1523.
DiSabato DJ, Nemeth DP, Liu X, Witcher KG, O’Neil SM, Oliver B, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor on hippocampal neurons drives social withdrawal and cognitive deficits after chronic social stress. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;26:4770–4782.
Brightwell JJ, Smith CA, Neve RL, Colombo PJ. Long-term memory for place learning is facilitated by expression of cAMP response element-binding protein in the dorsal hippocampus. Learn Mem. 2007;14:195–9.
Kim M, Franke V, Brandt B, Lowenstein ED, Schöwel V, Spuler S, et al. Single-nucleus transcriptomics reveals functional compartmentalization in syncytial skeletal muscle cells. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6375.
Del-Aguila JL, Li Z, Dube U, Mihindukulasuriya KA, Budde JP, Fernandez MV, et al. A single-nuclei RNA sequencing study of Mendelian and sporadic AD in the human brain. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11:1–16.
Shi Z, Das S, Morabito S, Miyoshi E, Swarup V. Protocol for single-nucleus ATAC sequencing and bioinformatic analysis in frozen human brain tissue. STAR Protoc. 2022;3:101491.
Takei S, Morinobu S, Yamamoto S, Fuchikami M, Matsumoto T, Yamawaki S. Enhanced hippocampal BDNF/TrkB signaling in response to fear conditioning in an animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45:460–8.
Kiselycznyk C, Hoffman DA, Holmes A. Effects of genetic deletion of the Kv4. 2 voltage-gated potassium channel on murine anxiety-, fear-and stress-related behaviors. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012;2:1–10.
Menard C, Pfau ML, Hodes GE, Kana V, Wang VX, Bouchard S, et al. Social stress induces neurovascular pathology promoting depression. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1752–60.
Pfau ML, Menard C, Cathomas F, Desland F, Kana V, Chan KL, et al. Role of monocyte-derived microRNA106b∼ 25 in resilience to social stress. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;86:474–82.
Wang C, Yue H, Hu Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Li J, et al. Microglia mediate forgetting via complement-dependent synaptic elimination. Science. 2020;367:688–94.
Yegla B, Boles J, Kumar A, Foster TC. Partial microglial depletion is associated with impaired hippocampal synaptic and cognitive function in young and aged rats. Glia. 2021;69:1494–514.
Dagher NN, Najafi AR, Kayala KM, Elmore MR, White TE, Medeiros R, et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition prevents microglial plaque association and improves cognition in 3xTg-AD mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:139.
Jones ME, Lebonville CL, Paniccia JE, Balentine ME, Reissner KJ, Lysle DT. Hippocampal interleukin-1 mediates stress-enhanced fear learning: a potential role for astrocyte-derived interleukin-1β. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;67:355–63.
Avital A, Goshen I, Kamsler A, Segal M, Iverfeldt K, Richter‐Levin G, et al. Impaired interleukin‐1 signaling is associated with deficits in hippocampal memory processes and neural plasticity. Hippocampus. 2003;13:826–34.
McMurray KM, Winter A, Ahlbrand R, Wilson A, Shukla S, Sah R. Subfornical organ interleukin 1 receptor: a novel regulator of spontaneous and conditioned fear associated behaviors in mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;101:304–17.
Maier SF, Watkins LR. Intracerebroventricular interleukin-1 receptor antagonist blocks the enhancement of fear conditioning and interference with escape produced by inescapable shock. Brain Res. 1995;695:279–82.
Batista AF, Rody T, Forny-Germano L, Cerdeiro S, Bellio M, Ferreira ST, et al. Interleukin-1β mediates alterations in mitochondrial fusion/fission proteins and memory impairment induced by amyloid-β oligomers. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:1–15.
Bender R, Lauterborn J, Gall C, Cariaga W, Baram T. Enhanced CREB phosphorylation in immature dentate gyrus granule cells precedes neurotrophin expression and indicates a specific role of CREB in granule cell differentiation. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13:679–86.
Zhu DY, Lau L, Liu SH, Wei JS, Lu YM. Activation of cAMP-response-element-binding protein (CREB) after focal cerebral ischemia stimulates neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101:9453–7.
Giachino C, De Marchis S, Giampietro C, Parlato R, Perroteau I, Schütz G, et al. cAMP response element-binding protein regulates differentiation and survival of newborn neurons in the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10105–18.
McKim DB, Weber MD, Niraula A, Sawicki CM, Liu X, Jarrett BL, et al. Microglial recruitment of IL-1β-producing monocytes to brain endothelium causes stress-induced anxiety. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1421–31.
Bernier BE, Lacagnina AF, Ayoub A, Shue F, Zemelman BV, Krasne FB, et al. Dentate gyrus contributes to retrieval as well as encoding: evidence from context fear conditioning, recall, and extinction. J Neurosci. 2017;37:6359–71.
Niraula A, Witcher KG, Sheridan JF, Godbout JP. Interleukin-6 induced by social stress promotes a unique transcriptional signature in the monocytes that facilitate anxiety. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;85:679–689.
Liu QY, Wang CY, Cai ZL, Xu ST, Liu WX, Xiao P, et al. Effects of intrahippocampal GABAB receptor antagonist treatment on the behavioral long-term potentiation and Y-maze learning performance. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014;114:26–31.
Souchet B, Guedj F, Sahún I, Duchon A, Daubigney F, Badel A, et al. Excitation/inhibition balance and learning are modified by Dyrk1a gene dosage. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;69:65–75.
Sadeh S, Clopath C. Excitatory-inhibitory balance modulates the formation and dynamics of neuronal assemblies in cortical networks. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabg8411.
Génin A, Davis S, Meziane H, Doyère V, Jeromin A, Roder J, et al. Regulated expression of the neuronal calcium sensor-1 gene during long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus in vivo. Neuroscience. 2001;106:571–7.
Boulware MI, Heisler JD, Frick KM. The memory-enhancing effects of hippocampal estrogen receptor activation involve metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling. J Neurosci. 2013;33:15184–94.
Lu Y, Sareddy GR, Wang J, Wang R, Li Y, Dong Y, et al. Neuron-derived estrogen regulates synaptic plasticity and memory. J Neurosci. 2019;39:2792–809.
Sananbenesi F, Fischer A, Wang X, Schrick C, Neve R, Radulovic J, et al. A hippocampal Cdk5 pathway regulates extinction of contextual fear. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1012–9.
Vakilna YS, Tang WC, Wheeler BC, Brewer GJ. The flow of axonal information among hippocampal subregions: 1. Feed-forward and feedback network spatial dynamics underpinning emergent information processing. Front Neural Circuits. 2021;15:660837.
Abel T, Nguyen PV, Barad M, Deuel TAS, Kandel ER, Bourtchouladze R. Genetic demonstration of a role for PKA in the late phase of LTP and in hippocampus-based long-term memory. Cell. 1997;88:615–26.
Yang YC, Ma YL, Chen SK, Wang CW, Lee EHY. Focal adhesion kinase is required, but not sufficient, for the induction of long-term potentiation in dentate gyrus neurons in vivo. J Neurosci. 2003;23:4072–80.
Ainge JA, Tamosiunaite M, Woergoetter F, Dudchenko PA. Hippocampal CA1 place cells encode intended destination on a maze with multiple choice points. J Neurosci. 2007;27:9769–79.
McLaughlin KJ, Baran SE, Wright RL, Conrad CD. Chronic stress enhances spatial memory in ovariectomized female rats despite CA3 dendritic retraction: possible involvement of CA1 neurons. Neuroscience. 2005;135:1045–54.
Liu IY, Lyons WE, Mamounas LA, Thompson RF. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor plays a critical role in contextual fear conditioning. J Neurosci. 2004;24:7958–63.
Chou D, Huang CC, Hsu KS. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the amygdala mediates susceptibility to fear conditioning. Exp Neurol. 2014;255:19–29.
Murakami S, Imbe H, Morikawa Y, Kubo C, Senba E. Chronic stress, as well as acute stress, reduces BDNF mRNA expression in the rat hippocampus but less robustly. Neurosci Res. 2005;53:129–39.
Grønli J, Bramham C, Murison R, Kanhema T, Fiske E, Bjorvatn B, et al. Chronic mild stress inhibits BDNF protein expression and CREB activation in the dentate gyrus but not in the hippocampus proper. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006;85:842–9.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by NIMH R01-MH-119670 and NIMH R01-MH-116670. RGB was supported by the OSU Presidential Fellowship. Our snRNA-sequencing was made possible by an allotment of resources from the Ohio Supercomputing Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EJG, DJD, JFS, and JPG contributed to study conception and design. EJG, RGB, JMP, SPS, and BO contributed to data collection. EJG, JFS, and JPG contributed to analysis and interpretation of results. EJG, JFS, and JPG contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Goodman, E.J., Biltz, R.G., Packer, J.M. et al. Enhanced fear memory after social defeat in mice is dependent on interleukin-1 receptor signaling in glutamatergic neurons. Mol Psychiatry 29, 2321–2334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02456-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02456-1
- Springer Nature Limited