Abstract
Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is suggested as risk marker for neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recently, pathologic tau deposition in the brain has been shown closely related to clinical manifestations, such as cognitive deficits. Yet, associations between tau pathology and MBI have rarely been investigated. It is further debated if MBI precedes cognitive deficits in AD. Here, we explored potential mechanisms by which MBI is related to AD, this by studying associations between MBI and tau in preclinical AD. In all, 50 amyloid-β-positive cognitively unimpaired subjects (part of the BioFINDER-2 study) underwent MBI-checklist (MBI-C) to assess MBI, and the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) delayed word recall (ADAS-DR) to assess episodic memory. Early tau pathology was determined using tau-PET ([18F]RO948 retention in entorhinal cortex/hippocampus) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) P-tau181. Regression models were used to test for associations. We found that higher tau-PET signal in the entorhinal cortex/hippocampus and CSF P-tau181 levels were associated with higher MBI-C scores (β = 0.010, SE = 0.003, p = 0.003 and β = 1.263, SE = 0.446, p = 0.007, respectively). When MBI-C and ADAS-DR were entered together in the regression models, tau-PET (β = 0.009, p = 0.009) and CSF P-tau181 (β = 0.408, p = 0.006) were predicted by MBI-C, but not ADAS-DR. We conclude that in preclinical AD, MBI is associated with tau independently from memory deficits. This denotes MBI as an important early clinical manifestation related to tau pathology in AD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia, affecting tens of millions of people worldwide1. Clinically, it is characterized by multifaceted symptoms including both cognitive deterioration and advancing neuropsychiatric or behavioral manifestations, ultimately leading to severe functional disability2. Neuropathological hallmarks of AD include amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles comprised of hyperphosphorylated tau2.
Lately, positron emission tomography (PET) studies have suggested that abnormal tau deposition rarely occur without presence of abnormal Aβ deposition, and further that tau is more strongly related, than Aβ, to the onset of cognitive decline and neurodegeneration3,4,5. Hence, tau pathology can serve as a good marker of disease mechanisms involved in the early manifestations of AD. Yet, few studies have explored the link between regional cerebral tau pathology and the behavioral manifestations in this disease6,7,8,9.
Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is a fairly novel concept, and is a neurobehavioral syndrome characterized by emergent, persistent, and diverse neuropsychiatric or behavioral symptoms late in life10. The syndrome is shown both detectable and prevalent in community and clinical samples11,12,13,14. The Alzheimer’s Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer’s Research and Treatment (ISTAART-AA) MBI criteria were developed to provide a standardized framework to explore these neuropsychiatric or behavioral symptoms as early manifestations of neurodegenerative disease and further to detect subjects at increased risk of dementia. The criteria also emphasize that MBI can occur in advance of, in concert with, or following mild cognitive impairment (MCI)10. Yet, it still remains to be demonstrated, whether MBI precedes or follows cognitive deficits in biomarker confirmed early AD, and whether MBI is associated with tau pathology at this preclinical phase.
In the present study we aimed to explore the cross-sectional association between MBI and biomarkers of tau pathology in preclinical AD and to compare associations with tau for MBI and episodic memory deficit.
Materials and methods
Study sample
The sample encompassed participants from three cohorts in the prospective and longitudinal Swedish BioFINDER−2 (BF-2) study (clinical trial no. NCT03174938), which were recruited from two centers in southern Sweden. Only cognitively unimpaired (CU) Aβ-positive subjects (n = 50),), representing preclinical Alzheimer’s pathological change or preclinical AD according to the NIA-AA research framework2, were included in the present study. Definition of Aβ-positivity is provided under section Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Of these, 25 were recruited as controls and 25 as subjects with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Controls were recruited from the BF-2 cohort A (aged 40–65 years) and B (aged 66–100 years), which represented neurologically and cognitively healthy controls. The SCD subjects were recruited from the BF-2 cohort C which includes subjects with either SCD or MCI. Classification for having SCD or MCI were based on performance on a neuropsychological test battery. This classification procedure as well as inclusion criteria for the separate cohorts are described in detail in the supplement (Supplementary eMethods). In agreement with the National Institute on Aging - Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) research framework, subjects with SCD were analyzed together with the controls as CU2.
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents
The Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, Sweden approved the study. All participants gave their written informed consent. Approval for PET imaging was obtained from the Swedish Medicines and Products Agency, and the local Radiation Safety Committee at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Clinical assessments
The global burden of MBI was measured using the Swedish version of the MBI checklist (MBI-C: www.MBItest.org)15. The MBI-C was developed to capture MBI in accordance with the ISTAART-AA MBI criteria, with language suitable for functionally independent community dwelling older adults. Importantly, the MBI-C mandates that symptoms have emerged late in life and persist for at least 6 months duration. The MBI-C has been validated in population-based samples16, as well as in samples of patients with SCD12 and MCI11. The MBI-C covers 34 items, representing five domains: (1) decreased drive and motivation (apathy, comprising 6 items, range 0–18 points), (2) affective dysregulation (mood and anxiety symptoms, comprising 6 items, range 0–18 points), (3) impulse dyscontrol (agitation, impulsivity, and abnormal reward salience, comprising 12 items, range 0–36 points), (4) social inappropriateness (impaired social cognition, comprising 5 items, range 0–15 points), and (5) abnormal perception and thought content (psychotic symptoms, comprising 5 items, range 0–15 points). Each question is answered with “No” (0 points) or “Yes” depending on if the actual symptoms have persisted for at least 6 months (continuously or intermittently) and represent a clear alteration from that person’s normal behavior. Items answered “Yes” are followed by a severity rating of either 1 point = mild, 2 points = moderate, or 3 points = severe. A MBI-C total score (range 0–102 points) is calculated by summing the scores of each item. Using a similar approach total scores for each domain can be generated. Subjects with >20% missing item responses (n = 1) were excluded prior to enrollment in this study. Eight (16.0%) subjects had one or two missing MBI-C responses out of 34 items in total. In the whole data set, 10 (0.6%) item responses were missing out of 1700. The “drive and motivation” domain item 6 was missing in 6 cases (12.0%) and in the remaining items <2.0% were missing. In our study, we used the informant-rated version of MBI-C, completed on an average of 0.8 months [2.1 SD] from baseline and 0.7 months [2.1 SD] before tau-PET with [18F]RO948.
Episodic memory impairment was assessed using the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) task “10 word Delayed Recall” (ADAS-DR) (measured on a scale of 0–10, where a score of 0 indicates no memory impairment and 10 indicates severe impairment of short-term memory)17,18.
Tau-PET scanning and processing
[18F]RO948-PET was performed on a digital GE Discovery MI scanner, 70–90 min post-injection. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images were created using the inferior cerebellar cortex as reference region19. Complete PET details are described elsewhere20.
In order to capture brain areas affected by tau deposition over the course of AD, three composite FreeSurfer-based regions-of-interest (ROI) were created according to the Braak tau pathology staging scheme21. These include region I-II (the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus), region III-IV (parahippocampal cortices, fusiform cortices, amygdala, as well as the inferior and the middle temporal cortices), and region V-VI (widespread neocortical areas)22. In a secondary analysis, regional associations between MBI-C total scores and [18F]RO948 SUVR were assessed using voxel-wise multiple regression models, including age, sex, education, and white matter volume as covariates, as implemented in SPM12 (https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/).
MRI acquisition and processing
High‐resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI images were obtained using a Siemens-3T MAGNETOM Prisma scanner for PET image co-registration and template normalization, as described elsewhere20. A T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences was also performed and used to obtain a volume measure of global white matter lesions (WML) volume, extracted using the LST toolbox for automated lesion prediction23, as implemented in SPM12.
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers
To acquire cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lumbar puncture was performed at baseline for the subjects in cohort A and B, while for subjects in cohort C this was performed within 3 months prior to baseline. CSF levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau181) were obtained using Innotest® immunoassay (Fujirebio; Gent, Belgium). Aβ42 and Aβ40 were determined using Meso Scale Discovery immunoassays (MSD; Rockville, MD, USA)24. Aβ-positivity in this study was defined by Aβ42/Aβ40 < 0.752 (cut-off obtained using Gaussian mixture modeling25). All CSF analyses were performed at the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Statistical analyses
First, items with missing scores were dropped, with MBI-C total and domain-specific scores calculated by summing up available item responses. However, for robustness we also handled missing item responses (10 data points out of 1700 for the included subjects, one subject was excluded from the study due to >20% missing items) using a single imputation procedure, as implemented via the “aregImpute” function in the Hmisc package in R. This function uses additive regression, bootstrapping, and predictive mean matching to impute missing values. Due to very low response frequencies in the higher MBI-C item response classes (severity rating 2–3), which did not meet the minimum sample size requirements of the “aregImpute” function, classes had to be collapsed for several items. The results from the non-imputed data set are reported as the main findings, while outcomes on the imputed data set are provided in the supplement (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).
Second, we performed multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate associations between MBI and tau biomarkers. MBI-C total was used as the independent variable, while tau-PET SUVR (in the various Braak stages) or CSF P-tau181 were entered as dependent variables in separate models. In addition to age, sex, and educational level models were adjusted for WML burden due their prevalence as a comorbidity in AD and their relation to some neuropsychiatric symptoms, e.g., apathy26,27. Model effect estimates are reported as β-values, variance as standard error of the mean (SE) and statistical significance as p-values. In a secondary analysis we used a voxel-based approach to investigate the relationship between MBI and tau-PET SUVR.
Third, when an association was seen between MBI-C total score and tau-PET or CSF P-tau181, we conducted similar regression models with ADAS-DR as the independent variable. Additionally, we explored if MBI and episodic memory deficit were independently associated with tau pathology or confounded each other in a combined model where both MBI-C and ADAS-DR were entered as independent variables. In these combined models, MBI-C and ADAS-DR were standardized using z-scores.
Lastly, to explore how tau pathology is related to the underlying MBI-C domains, the total score for each domain was entered as the independent variable in similar separate models, as described above.
For all statistical tests, a significance threshold of p < 0.05 (two-sided) was used. Adjustment for multiple comparisons has not been made given the explorative approach of this study. Model assumptions for linear regression were checked by evaluating normality and homoscedasticity of residuals versus fitted values. All analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1.
Results
Demographics and clinical characteristics
Demographic and clinical characteristics are displayed in Table 1. Mean age across all subjects was 72.3 years (9.7 SD), 50% were females and the mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was 28.8 (1.3 SD). Mean number of years in education was 12.0 years (3.6 SD). Mean MBI-C total score was 4.0 (6.5 SD). The MBI-C domains social inappropriateness and, abnormal perception and thought content displayed lower mean scores (0.2 [0.8 SD] and 0.1 [0.4 SD], respectively) compared to the other domains.
Associations between MBI-C total score and tau pathology
The MBI-C total score was significantly associated with tau-PET SUVR in the Braak I-II ROI (β = 0.010, SE = 0.003, p = 0.003) as well as with CSF P-tau181 levels (β = 1.263, SE = 0.446, p = 0.007) (Table 2). MBI-C was not predictive of tau deposition in the two other composite regions (Braak III-IV ROI: β = 0.003, SE = 0.005, p = 0.559; Braak V-VI ROI: β = 0.002, SE = 0.003, p = 0.510). Similar results were obtained using the imputed data set (Supplementary Table 1). The whole-brain voxel-wise analysis revealed significant relationship between MBI-C and tau deposition in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus, as well as to a lesser degree in the anterior fusiform gyrus (Fig. 1).
MBI and memory deficit as predictors of tau pathology
The ADAS-DR scores predicted tau-PET signal in the Braak stage I-II ROI only at a trend level (β=0.025, SE = 0.013, p = 0.065) (Table 2). In the combined model, where both MBI-C and ADAS-DR were entered simultaneously in order to control for each other, only MBI-C remained associated with tau-PET (β = 0.009, SE = 0.003, p = 0.009). Similar results were found for CSF P-tau181 in the combined models, for which only MBI remained associated with CSF P-tau181 (β = 0.408, SE = 0.142, p = 0.006). The imputed data set rendered comparable results (Supplementary Table 1).
Associations between MBI-C domains and tau pathology
The MBI-C domains affective dysregulation (β=0.025, SE = 0.009, p = 0.006) and impulse dyscontrol (β = 2.347, SE = 0.907, p = 0.013) were associated with tau-PET SUVR in the Braak I-II ROI as well as CSF P-tau181 levels (Table 3). The other MBI-C domains did not display any associations with tau pathology. Also here, the imputed data set provided similar results (Supplementary Table 2).
Discussion
In this cross-sectional study, which is one of the first to focus on subjects with preclinical AD, we found that MBI scores, but not episodic memory impairment, were independently associated with early tau pathology determined using either CSF P-tau181 or tau-PET. Tau-PET associations were confined to the Braak I-II regions (the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus), according to both ROI and voxel-based approaches.
MBI and regional tau deposition
In contrast to our findings, a recent study addressing the association between MBI and AD biomarkers (amyloid and tau-PET) in CU subjects found that MBI scores were associated with global and striatal amyloid-PET signal, but not with tau-PET6. This study, however, also included Aβ-negative cases; as abnormal tau PET is essentially only seen in the context of Aβ-positivity4,5, this may have resulted in the absence of an association between MBI and tau PET or in a study that was underpowered to detect such an association. More in line with our results, another recent study found an association between tau deposition and multiple behavioral features (including personality traits such as neuroticism and openness, apathy, depression, lifetime cognitive activity) in a cohort of CU older adults at increased risk of AD due to a positive family history of sporadic disease8. Similar to our findings, tau-PET signal in the entorhinal cortex showed the strongest association to behavioral features.
Disturbances in drive and emotions in AD are often referred to as manifestations of frontal lobe pathology, wherefore an association with temporal tau deposition could be considered a somewhat unexpected finding in its relation to neuropsychiatric symptoms. Yet, most pathological studies displaying such frontal associations have been conducted on MCI and AD dementia samples, not on CU samples27,28. Some studies focusing on cerebral atrophy have instead strengthened the role of the temporal lobe pathology in neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms, such as apathy, among CU subjects29,30. Bridging the gap, we recently reported similar results among CU and MCI cases, arguing for a higher level of apathy to be associated with atrophy predominately in the temporal lobe, and also to a lesser extent the frontal lobe26. Taken together, these initial CU studies, using MRI and tau-PET, point to core AD pathologies in the temporal lobe to play important roles in the early development of neuropsychiatric or behavioral symptoms.
MBI versus memory deficit in relation to tau pathology
Memory loss is often referred to as one of the main findings in the early clinical stages of AD31. Hypothetically, this could mediate the association between MBI scores and tau in the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus. For instance, awareness over emergent memory deficits could give rise to anxiety or other affective disturbances over having a potential underlying neurodegenerative disease. Our regression models, however, using both tau-PET and CSF P-tau181, showed that episodic memory impairment was not associated with tau pathology. Furthermore, the association between MBI and tau deposition survived correction for memory performance. Taken together, this indicates that the association between MBI and tau is independent from memory deficits and positions MBI as an important and early clinical manifestation of tau pathology in AD. Additionally, the fact that MBI associated with tau but not memory deficits in a cohort of CU individuals lends support to the ISTAART-AA MBI criteria indicating that MBI can precede MCI10. In this respect, 30% of the CU participants in the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center (NACC) data set that later developed AD dementia displayed neuropsychiatric or behavioral symptoms before the diagnosis of MCI32. Combined, these studies indicate that MBI has the potential to aid in early risk assessments of underlying neuropathology.
Mechanistically, the interplay between MBI and cognitive symptoms in preclinical AD (i.e., Aβ-positive CU) is complex. Our findings showed associations between MBI and regional tau deposition in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus, regions shown to be affected by tau pathology early on in the course of AD21. Therefore, confinement of associations in these regions align well with our use of a CU sample. Nonetheless, these are structures not primarily ascribed roles in emotion and behavior. The hippocampus, however, is highly interconnected with the amygdala, a region important for emotional processing. Hippocampus and amygdala have also been suggested to interact synergistically during the process of long-term memory formation33,34. Together, they also display widespread connections to other important parts of the brain related to both cognitive and emotional functioning, including the frontal cortex33,34. Altogether, it could be hypothesized that early tau deposition in the hippocampus has an indirect but close effect on emotions via disruption of the emotional brain network.
The MBI domains and their associations with tau pathology
Only the MBI-C domains of affective regulation and impulse dyscontrol were shown to be related to tau pathology. The former consists of items covering both anxiety and depressive symptoms, while the later encompasses irritability, agitation, and aggression15. Thus, we find these results to be in concordance with the findings by Gatchel et al. reporting depressive symptoms related to temporal tau deposition35 and by Ramakers et al. reporting anxiety associated with CSF total tau36. Impulse dyscontrol and agitation have lately attracted research interest as potential early markers of dementia in mid and late life37. In support of our results, agitation and aggression have previously been linked to core AD CSF biomarkers38. Further highlighting the role of affective disorders and impulse dyscontrol, within the earliest stages of neurodegenerative disease, both depression and irritability have been demonstrated to be some of the most common manifestations preceding cognitive decline32. Nonetheless, more studies are needed to fully unravel the link between these constructs and early AD pathology.
Limitations and strengths
First, the cross-sectional nature of this study renders it difficult to fully explore the temporal order of appearance of neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive deficits. Second, the study sample size is somewhat modest, which needs to be taken into account when the results are interpreted. Adding to this, the total scores for some MBI domains were quite low, which could have reduced the statistical power for these specific analyses. Third, ADAS-DR might not fully detect the most subtle changes in memory performance among otherwise cognitively healthy subjects. Moreover, as we only included Aβ-positive CU subjects, these findings do not necessarily apply to CU subjects in general. Yet, this is also an important strength to the study, since we investigated subjects with a particularly high risk of developing cognitive deficits, thus also those most appropriate for future AD secondary prevention trials. Additional strengths of this study include that we report on a well-characterized sample of subjects with preclinical AD where cerebrovascular disease has been controlled for. Another is the reporting on both unimputed and imputed data, as well as the fact that similar results were obtained using two different markers for early tau pathology (CSF P-tau and tau-PET signal in Braak 1-2 ROI).
Conclusion
These findings denote MBI as an important early clinical manifestation associated with tau pathology in preclinical AD, which further could have implications for clinical care and AD clinical trials. Future studies should aim to validate these findings in larger samples and preferably with the use of longitudinal data.
Code availability
The code that support the findings of this study will be shared by request from a qualified academic investigator.
References
Prince M. et al. World Alzheimer Report 2015. The global impact of dementia: an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London, 84p (2015).
Jack, C. R. et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 535–562 (2018).
Mattsson, N. et al. Predicting diagnosis and cognition with (18)F-AV-1451 tau PET and structural MRI in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 570–580 (2019).
Jack, C. R. et al. The bivariate distribution of amyloid-beta and tau: relationship with established neurocognitive clinical syndromes. Brain 142, 3230–3242 (2019).
Leuzy, A. et al. Diagnostic performance of RO948 F 18 tau positron emission tomography in the differentiation of Alzheimer disease from other neurodegenerative disorders. JAMA Neurol. 77, 955–965 (2020).
Lussier, F. Z. et al. Mild behavioral impairment is associated with beta-amyloid but not tau or neurodegeneration in cognitively intact elderly individuals. Alzheimers Dement. 16, 192–199 (2020).
Babulal, G. M. et al. Depression is associated with tau and not amyloid positron emission tomography in cognitively normal adults. J. Alzheimers Dis. 74, 1045–1055 (2020).
Pichet Binette, A. et al. Amyloid and tau pathology associations with personality traits, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cognitive lifestyle in the preclinical phases of sporadic and autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1016/J.biopsych.2020.01.023 (2020).
d’Oleire Uquillas, F. et al. Regional tau pathology and loneliness in cognitively normal older adults. Transl. Psychiatry 8, 282 (2018).
Ismail, Z. et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 195–202 (2016).
Mallo, S. C. et al. Assessing mild behavioral impairment with the Mild behavioral impairment-checklist in people with mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimes Dis. 66, 83–95 (2018).
Mallo, S. C. et al. Assessing mild behavioral impairment with the mild behavioral impairment checklist in people with subjective cognitive decline. Int. Psychogeriatr. 31, 231–239 (2019).
Sheikh, F. et al. Prevalence of mild behavioral impairment in mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive decline, and its association with caregiver burden. Int. Psychogeriatr. 30, 233–244 (2018).
Mortby, M. E., Ismail, Z. & Anstey, K. J. Prevalence estimates of mild behavioral impairment in a population-based sample of pre-dementia states and cognitively healthy older adults. Int. Psychogeriatr. 30, 221–232 (2018).
Ismail, Z. et al. The Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C): a rating scale for neuropsychiatric symptoms in pre-dementia populations. J. Alzheimers Dis. 56, 929–938 (2017).
Creese, B. et al. Profile of mild behavioral impairment and factor structure of the mild behavioral impairment checklist in cognitively normal older adults. Int. Psychogeriatr. 32, 705–717 (2019).
Irizarry, M. C. et al. Predictors of placebo group decline in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) in 24 week clinical trials of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 14, 301–311 (2008).
Rosen, W. G., Mohs, R. C. & Davis, K. L. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Psychiatry 141, 1356–1364 (1984).
Baker, S. L., Maass, A. & Jagust, W. J. Considerations and code for partial volume correcting [(18)F]-AV-1451 tau PET data. Data Brief. 15, 648–657 (2017).
Smith, R. et al. Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 47, 342–354 (2020).
Braak, H., Alafuzoff, I., Arzberger, T., Kretzschmar, H. & Del Tredici, K. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 112, 389–404 (2006).
Cho, H. et al. In vivo cortical spreading pattern of tau and amyloid in the Alzheimer disease spectrum. Ann. Neurol. 80, 247–258 (2016).
Schmidt, P. et al. An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in multiple sclerosis.Neuroimage 59, 3774–3783 (2012).
Palmqvist, S. et al. Accuracy of brain amyloid detection in clinical practice using cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 42: a cross-validation study against amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurol. 71, 1282–1289 (2014).
Bertens, D., Tijms, B. M., Scheltens, P., Teunissen, C. E. & Visser, P. J. Unbiased estimates of cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid 1-42 cutoffs in a large memory clinic population. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 9, 8 (2017).
Johansson, M. et al. Apathy and anxiety are early markers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 85, 74–82 (2020).
Rosenberg, P. B., Nowrangi, M. A. & Lyketsos, C. G. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: what might be associated brain circuits? Mol. Aspects Med. 43-44, 25–37 (2015).
Marshall, G. A. et al. Regional tau correlates of instrumental activities of daily living and apathy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. J. Alzheimers Dis. 67, 757–768 (2019).
Guercio, B. J. et al. Apathy is associated with lower inferior temporal cortical thickness in mild cognitive impairment and normal elderly individuals. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 27, e22–e27 (2014).
Donovan, N. J. et al. Regional cortical thinning predicts worsening apathy and hallucinations across the Alzheimer disease spectrum. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 22, 1168–1179 (2014).
Aisen, P. S. et al. On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 9, 60 (2017).
Wise, E. A., Rosenberg, P. B., Lyketsos, C. G. & Leoutsakos, J.-M. Time course of neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive diagnosis in National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Centers volunteers. Alzheimers Dement. (Amst) 11, 333–339 (2019).
Yang, Y. & Wang, J. Z. From structure to behavior in basolateral amygdala-hippocampus circuits. Front. Neural Circuits 11, 86 (2017).
Wang, J. & Barbas, H. Specificity of primate amygdalar pathways to hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 38, 10019–10041 (2018).
Gatchel, J. R. et al. Depressive symptoms and tau accumulation in the inferior temporal lobe and entorhinal cortex in cognitively normal older adults: a pilot study. J. Alzheimers Dis. 59, 975–985 (2017).
Ramakers, I. et al. Anxiety is related to Alzheimer cerebrospinal fluid markers in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Psychol. Med. 43, 911–920 (2013).
Bateman, D. R. et al. Agitation and impulsivity in mid and late life as possible risk markers for incident dementia. Alzheimer’s Dement. (NY) 6, e12016 (2020).
Showraki, A. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer’s disease/mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 71, 477–501 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation, the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg foundation, the Strategic Research Area MultiPark (Multidisciplinary Research in Parkinson’s disease) at Lund University, the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation, the Swedish Brain Foundation, the Parkinson foundation of Sweden, the Bundy Academy, the Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse, the Gorthon stiftelsen, the Elly Berggren Foundation, the Thelma Zoega Foundation, the Parkinson Research Foundation, the Skåne University Hospital Foundation, and the Swedish federal government under the ALF agreement. The precursor of [18F]RO948 was provided by Roche. The authors also wish to recognize Max Olsson at the Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, for his help with data extraction.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Lund University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Hansson has acquired research support (for the institution) from Roche, Pfizer, GE Healthcare, Biogen, Eli Lilly, and AVID Radiopharmaceuticals. In the past 2 years, he has received consultancy/speaker fees (paid to the institution) from Biogen and Roche. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, M., Stomrud, E., Insel, P.S. et al. Mild behavioral impairment and its relation to tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry 11, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01206-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01206-z
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Plasma neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acid protein, and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers for neuropsychiatric symptoms and related clinical disease progression
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy (2024)
-
Mild behavioral impairment in early Alzheimer’s disease and its association with APOE and BDNF risk genetic polymorphisms
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy (2024)
-
Optimizing detection of Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment: a 4-year biomarker study of mild behavioral impairment in ADNI and MEMENTO
Molecular Neurodegeneration (2023)
-
A longitudinal study of late-life psychosis and incident dementia and the potential effects of race and cognition
Nature Mental Health (2023)
-
A narrative review on mild behavioural impairment: an exploration into its scientific perspectives
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (2023)