Abstract
Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) hyperactivation by JAK2V617F mutation leads to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and targeting JAK2 could serve as a promising therapeutic strategy for MPNs. Here, we report that Flonoltinib Maleate (FM), a selective JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, shows high selectivity for JAK2 over the JAK family. Surface plasmon resonance assays verified that FM had a stronger affinity for the pseudokinase domain JH2 than JH1 of JAK2 and had an inhibitory effect on JAK2 JH2V617F. The cocrystal structure confirmed that FM could stably bind to JAK2 JH2, and FM suppressed endogenous colony formation of primary erythroid progenitor cells from patients with MPNs. In several JAK2V617F-induced MPN murine models, FM could dose-dependently reduce hepatosplenomegaly and prolong survival. Similar results were observed in JAK2V617F bone marrow transplantation mice. FM exhibited strong inhibitory effects on fibrosis of the spleen and bone marrow. Long-term FM treatment showed good pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics with high drug exposure in tumor-bearing tissues and low toxicity. Currently, FM has been approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China (CXHL2000628), and this study will guide clinical trials for patients with MPNs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a family of clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells featuring a continuous proliferation of one or more lineage cells in the bone marrow (BM) [1, 2]. Mutations of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), predominantly JAK2V617F, are discovered in ~95% of patients with polycythemia vera and 50–60% of patients with essential thrombocythemia, as well as primary myelofibrosis (MF) [3,4,5,6]. These previous results suggest that JAK2 is an important therapeutic target in the treatment of JAK2V617F-induced MPNs.
Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is the first drug approved for the treatment of intermediate-2 and high-risk patients with MF and alleviates the splenomegaly and systemic symptoms in patients with MF [7,8,9,10,11]. Despite these clinical benefits, ruxolitinib could cause severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, and granulocyte deficiency, apart from non-specific systemic symptoms, such as diarrhea and fatigue [12,13,14,15]. These side effects may be related to the inhibition of JAK1 [16, 17], which is associated with IFN-γ resistance and cancer evasion [18]. Fedratinib, a dual JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor approved in 2019 by the FDA for the treatment of MF, improved the selectivity of JAK2 over the JAK family and simultaneously inhibited FLT3. Fedratinib significantly inhibited disease progression compared to the best available therapies after long-term treatment [19, 20]. However, fedratinib is associated with vitamin B1 deficiency-related Wernicke’s encephalopathy [21, 22]. Therefore, the development of highly selective JAK2/FLT3 inhibitors with reduced toxicities to treat JAK2V617F-induced MPNs is clinically urgently needed.
JAK2 protein contains seven homology domains (JH1-7), of which JH1 (residues 836-1132) is the kinase domain, and JH2 (residues 543-824) is the pseudokinase domain [23]. JH1 could activate JAK2 through auto-phosphorylation and block the catalytic activity of kinases by blocking ATP and downstream phosphorylation pathway signal transduction [24, 25]. The JH2 domain has no catalytic activity but could negatively regulate the activity of JH1 and inhibit the kinase activity of JAK2 [26]. The V617F mutation site is located above the N-terminus of the JH2 domain [27], and when the valine at position 617 is replaced by phenylalanine with a higher molecular weight, the prolongation of helix C and the interaction between F617 and the helix C phenylalanines 594 and 595 of JH2 domain is stable and activates the JH1 domain [28,29,30,31]. Ruxolitinib and fedratinib are the most representative JAK kinase inhibitors for the treatment of MF, and both of them bind to the JAK2 JH1 domain [32, 33]. Recently, Bristol Myers Squibb Company (BMS) has developed a highly selective TYK2 inhibitor, named BMS-986165, which acts by binding to the TYK2 JH2 domain. BMS-986165 has been proven to greatly improve selectivity and reduce side effects [34]. Therefore, the development of highly selective JAK2 inhibitors binding to the JAK2 JH2 (pseudokinase domain) may be of great significance in improving the selectivity for JAK2 over the JAK family for the treatment of JAK2V617F-driven patients.
Here, we reported that a highly selective JAK2 inhibitor, named Flonoltinib Maleate (FM), had an inhibitory effect on JH1, JH2, and JH2V617F of JAK2, and its crystal structure confirmed that FM could stably bind to the JAK2 JH2 domain, which may contribute to the selectivity for the JAK family. Furthermore, FM showed potent efficacy in cell lines as well as murine models of MPNs, additional to primary cells acquired from patients with MPNs. In various MPN models, FM could significantly reduce tumor burden, suppress disease progression, and extend the survival of mice. In addition, FM exhibited higher drug exposure in the tumor-bearing tissue than the plasma and showed good pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics and low toxicity. Currently, FM has been approved by the National Medical Productions Administration of China (CXHL2000628), and this research will provide evidence for FM clinical trials in JAK2-driven MPN treatment.
Materials and methods
Compounds and reagents
2-((1-(2-fluoro-4-((4-(1-isopropyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-5-methylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino)phenyl)piperidin-4-yl)(methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol (FM) was synthesized in the laboratory. Ruxolitinib phosphate (cat#1092939-17-7) and Fedratinib/TG101348 (cat#936091-26-8) were purchased from Sichuan Shuyan Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. The dissolving methods of in vitro as well as in vivo experiments are presented in Supplementary Information (SI).
Cell culture
All the cells have been identified by short tandem repeats profiling after 2017. MV-4-11, Molm-13, Ba/F3-JAK2WT, and HEL cells (ATCC) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Cat. No. SH30809.01, Hyclone) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Cat. No.10099-141, Gibco), and penicillin/streptomycin (Cat. No. SV30010, Hyclone). Ba/F3-JAK2WT cell culture medium was supplemented with 10 µg/mL IL-3 (Cat. No. 213-13, PeproTech) and 2-hydroxy-1-ethanethiol (Cat. No. 60-24-2, Sigma). Ba/F3-JAK2V617F and Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F cells were established via retroviral transduction of the vector MSCV-IRES-GFP carrying the JAK2V617F and EPOR cDNA with polybrene (Cat. No. H8761, Solarbio). The cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
MTT assay for cell proliferation
For in vitro inhibition assays, cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates with a density of 15,000–20,000 cells/well after the cells reached 70–90% confluence. After overnight incubation, the cells received a supplement of serial concentrations of FM and underwent 72 h incubation at 37 °C under 5% CO2. MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (Cat. No. 1334GR001; BioFroxx) assay was conducted in order to examine viability. The IC50 values were fitted using GraphPad Prism 7.0.
Colony formation assays
Peripheral blood (PB) or BM specimens of patients with MPNs were acquired from West China Hospital with approval of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University (Chengdu, China) clinical ethics committee. We have obtained a statement confirming that informed consent was obtained from all subjects (clinical information is presented in Table S1). A total of 2 × 105 cells were seeded in a methylcellulose semi-solid medium with an increasing concentration of FM. Colonies were detected at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and ≥95% humidity after 14 days.
In vivo efficacy studies
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Sichuan University. Female NOD/SCID mice and BALB/c nude mice were purchased from the Beijing HFK Bioscience Company. Male BALB/c mice were bought from GemPharmatech Co., Ltd. The animal experiments were not blinded to the groups. Mice were six to eight weeks old upon tumor implantation.
We established three JAK2V617-induced splenomegaly models. The first was the Ba/F3-JAK2V617F disease model. We constructed the V617F mutant JAK2 gene using molecular biology techniques and transferred the gene to Ba/F3, and then 3 × 106 Ba/F3-JAK2V617F cells were injected into BALB/c nude mice through the tail vein to induce splenomegaly and simulate the symptoms of JAK2V617F gene mutation-bearing patients. Next, we established the Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F disease model using the same modeling method as that of the Ba/F3-JAK2V617F disease model. This model induced a greater extent of disease burden, faster onset, and more severe hepatosplenomegaly in mice because both JAK2V617F and EPOR were transduced in Ba/F3 cells. Finally, we established a JAK2V617F bone marrow transplantation (BMT) model based on irradiated mice. As the disease progressed, JAK2V617F induced primary splenomegaly, splenic fibrosis, and BM fibrosis. The details of the models and methods are described in SI.
Results
Potent and highly selective inhibition of JAK2 by FM
FM, a potent and highly selective JAK2 and FLT3 inhibitor, was designed and synthesized in our laboratory [35] (Fig. 1A). In in vitro kinase assays, FM showed strong kinase inhibition for JAK2, JAK2V617F, and FLT3 with the IC50 values of 0.8, 1.4, and 15 nM, respectively. FM showed 650–900 folds more selectivity to JAK2 than JAK1 and JAK3, and ~80 folds greater selectivity for JAK2 over TYK2 (Fig. 1B). Thus, FM exhibited the best selectivity for JAK2 over the JAK family among reported JAK2 inhibitors [36,37,38,39] (Table S2).
Next, we calculated the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values for the JAK2-JH1/JAK2-JH2 backbone atoms and non-hydrogen atoms of FM according to the structures obtained by molecular docking, and we also used MM/GBSA to calculate the absolute binding free energies for FM with JAK2 JH1 and FM with JAK2 JH2 systems. A detailed description of the results was provided in the SI (Fig. S1A–F and Tables S3–5). The \(\Delta {{{\mathrm{G}}}}_{{{{\mathrm{bind}}}}}^{{{{\mathrm{cal}}}}}\) of FM/JAK2 is around −16.06 and −20.26 kcal/mol for JH1 and JH2, respectively. We could speculate that FM could simultaneously bind with JH1 and JH2 of JAK2, but the binding ability of FM on JAK2 JH2 is significantly stronger than JAK2 JH1. Then a surface plasmon resonance assay was used to compare the affinity of FM binding to JH1, JH2, and JH2V617F of JAK2. The results showed that FM could bind JAK2 JH2 and JAK2 JH2V617F protein with the KD values of 3.14 and 5.21 µM, respectively, indicating that FM had a better affinity for JAK2 JH2 compared to JAK2 JH1 and JAK2 JH2V617F (Fig. 1C). Considering these experimental results, we then focused on the interaction between JAK2 JH2 and FM. We obtained the crystal structure of the complex of JAK2 JH2 and FM (Fig. 1D–F and Table S6). Two nitrogen atoms of pyrimidine-2-amine in FM were found to form two hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl and NH backbone of V629 in the hinge region of JAK2. The hydrophobic interaction between FM and the surrounding amino acid residues of JAK2 could also be found in the complex of JAK2 JH2 and FM. The L551, I559, L579, and L680 of JAK2 could further enhance the binding stability between FM and JAK2 JH2. The benzene of FM could form a hydrophobic interaction with the side chain of L551. The I559 of JAK2 also interacted with the pyrazole ring of FM with hydrophobic interaction. In addition, the other hydrophobic residues near the active binding site also contributed to the binding affinity, such as the V610, F628, and F631 for JAK2 (Fig. 1D–F). The V617F mutation site is located above the N-terminus of the JAK2 JH2 domain; consistently, FM presented high inhibitory activity and selectivity for JAK2 JH2 protein.
To further determine the selectivity of FM to inhibit different JAK isotypes in cell lines, we performed a series of cytokine-stimulated cell-based assays [40, 41] and assessed the signal transduction of JAK subtypes. FM inhibited GM-CSF-induced p-STAT5, which involve JAK2/JAK2 signaling with an IC50 value of 0.12 µM. However, in JAK1/TYK2 pathway with IFN-α-induced p-STAT1, FM showed weak inhibition with an IC50 > 5 µM. In addition, in IFN-γ-induced p-STAT1 in U2OS cells and G-CSF-induced p-STAT3 in HEL cells which required the activity of JAK1/JAK2, the IC50 values for FM were 0.39 µM and 0.46 µM, respectively (Figs. 1G and S2A). These data indicated that the inhibitory activity of FM to JAK2 was greater than those of JAK1, JAK3, and TYK2, which was consistent with the high selectivity of FM in vitro kinase assays.
In vitro cellular activity of FM
The activity of FM was evaluated on a panel of JAK2-dependent and FLT3 mutated cell lines. As shown in Table S7, the anti-proliferative IC50 values of FM were <0.5 μM on JAK2V617F mutant cell lines, and FM showed stronger anti-proliferative activity in mutant (Ba/F3-JAK2V617F) cell lines with an IC50 value of 0.20 ± 0.01 µM than that of wild-type cells (Ba/F3-JAK2WT) with an IC50 value of 0.39 ± 0.20 µM, which showed 1.95-fold better selectivity than JAK2WT (V617F/WT ratio). The inhibitory effect of FM on FLT3 mutant tumor cell lines was also obvious with an IC50 < 0.1 μM. Overall, FM showed significant anti-proliferative effects on multiple JAK2 or FLT3 mutant cell lines in vitro, and its effect was superior or comparable to those of ruxolitinib and fedratinib.
To further evaluate the effects of JAK2V617F or FLT3 mutated cell lines, we treated Ba/F3-JAK2V617F, Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F, HEL, and MV-4-11 cells with serial levels of FM. The results showed that FM blocked the cell cycle at the G2-M phase (Figs. 2A and S2B–C) and induced tumor cell apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner (Figs. 2B and S2D–E). In Ba/F3-JAK2V617F and Ba/F3-EROR-JAK2V617F cell lines, the activity of FM to induce apoptosis was significantly better than those of ruxolitinib and fedratinib in the low concentration range (Fig. 2B).
Aiming at the exploration of whether JAK2 inhibition by FM could affect the JAK/STAT pathway, phosphorylation of JAKs and downstream proteins were assessed in HEL and Ba/F3-JAK2V617F cell lines. FM dose-dependently suppressed the phosphorylation of JAK2, STAT3, STAT5, and ERK1/2, and ruxolitinib and fedratinib served as positive controls (Fig. 2C). As FLT3 is another FM target, we also examined the phosphorylation of FLT3, as well as its downstream signaling effectors in the Molm-13 cell line. As expected, the levels of p-FLT3, p-STAT5, and p-ERK1/2 decreased significantly at low concentrations of FM (Fig. S2F). These results indicated that FM inhibited the phosphorylation of JAK2-directed signaling and triggered apoptosis in cell lines with JAK2 dependence. Thus, FM could possibly treat JAK2V617F mutation-dependent diseases.
FM exerting robust antitumor activity in Ba/F3-JAK2 V617F disease model
To further investigate the effect of FM, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy in an MPN-like Ba/F3-JAK2V617F mouse model, which was characterized by severe splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and reduced food intake. As shown in Fig. 3A, both FM and fedratinib significantly extended the survival, and the median survivals were respective 30 and 31 days in FM-treated (15 and 30 mg/kg) groups, and 28 days in fedratinib-treated (30 mg/kg) groups compared to 25 days in the vehicle group. In addition, FM markedly reduced the spleen weight, and the inhibition of the spleen growth was 72.56% and 97.92% in FM-treated (15 and 30 mg/kg) groups, and 67.44% in the fedratinib-treated group (Fig. 3B). There was no obvious body weight decrease at any dose of FM and fedratinib, and the animals were in good condition during treatment (Fig. S3A).
We then isolated spleen cells from mice with disease progression to assess the levels of crucial proteins. Similar to in vitro findings, FM decreased the p-STAT3 and p-STAT5 levels after 22 days of treatment (Fig. 3C). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis indicated that both FM and fedratinib significantly inhibited the protein level of p-JAK2 in the spleen, whereas FM exhibited a stronger inhibitory effect than fedratinib (FM vs. fedratinib at 30 mg/kg, p = 0.0441) (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, the histopathological analysis revealed that the tumor infiltration was significantly reduced, and extramedullary hematopoiesis was improved in the FM therapy group. Unlike the myelo-erythroid infiltration observed in spleens of vehicle-treated mice, FM therapy restored normal splenic architecture (Fig. 3D). Overall, the expansion of the erythroid progenitor characteristic of the expression of JAK2V617F was significantly reduced with FM therapy, which indicated that FM has the potential to treat the Ba/F3-JAK2V617F disease model.
Effects of FM in an EPOR-JAK2 V617F-driven murine malignancy model
Next, we investigated the in vivo activity of FM using an EPOR-JAK2V617F-driven MPN mouse model, as the EPOR (erythropoietin receptor) gene activates JAK2 tyrosine kinase [42, 43]. Compared to the Ba/F3-JAK2V617F disease model, this model displayed a greater tumor burden, faster onset, and more severe hepatosplenomegaly. Consistent with the results of the previous model, although the EPOR-JAK2V617F-driven malignancy mouse model progressed rapidly, FM still showed a good therapeutic effect. Both FM and fedratinib significantly prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice compared to the vehicle. The median survival times were 22, 25, and 25 days in the FM-treated (15, 30, and 45 mg/kg) groups and 22 days in the fedratinib-treated (30 mg/kg) group versus 19 days in the vehicle group, respectively (Fig. 4A). Complete blood count analysis showed that FM and fedratinib reduced the white blood cells at the same dose of 30 mg/kg (Fig. 4B). We also observed that the levels of inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and TNF-α, decreased markedly after FM treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4C). Evaluation of the tumor burden in PB showed that FM effectively inhibited Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F cell proliferation (Fig. 4D).
In addition, vehicle-treated mice showed enlargement of the spleen and liver with average weights of 594.67 ± 36.58 mg and 1.76 ± 0.17 g, respectively. FM- and fedratinib-treated mice were remarkably inhibited in terms of spleen and liver, and mice almost recovered to normal weights at FM of 45 mg/kg (Fig. 4E–F). As shown in Fig. 4G, the histology of the spleens from mice in the vehicle group showed extensive infiltration with extramedullary hematopoiesis and complete effacement of splenic architecture, whereas there was a partial restoration of the splenic architecture in the high-dose group with intact follicles covering 30%–50% of the area. In addition, the liver histology revealed mild infiltration with extramedullary hematopoiesis, ranging from small periportal aggregates and scattered megakaryocytes to large perivascular and random aggregates of maturing granulocytes in the vehicle and low-dose groups, but not in the high-dose group (Fig. 4G). The tissues of FM treatment mice did not show serious damage (data not shown), which indicated that FM did not cause obvious visceral toxicity. Moreover, we analyzed the levels of p-JAK2, p-STAT3, and p-STAT5 in the spleen via IHC and showed that the phosphorylation levels of downstream proteins were inhibited by FM treatment (Figs. 4G and S3B). Overall, these results indicated that FM exerted robust activity in the Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F disease model in vivo.
PK/PD studies of FM in Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2 V617F-driven mouse model
The PK/PD studies of single and repeated administration of FM were examined in a Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F malignancy mouse model, and the findings were displayed in SI (Figs. 5A–G, Fig. S4A–F, Table 1, and Tables S8–9). FM significantly inhibited tumor progression in Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F tumor-bearing mice with high drug exposure in tumor-bearing tissues (Fig. 5A–B). At 8 and 12 h after the last administration, the FM concentration in the spleen was 2151.00 ± 1385.33 ng/g and 390.80 ± 181.44 ng/g, respectively, and the exposure AUC(0–24h) and Cmax of the spleen were 17.95 and 14.14 folds higher than that of plasma, respectively, which indicated that FM was rapidly eliminated in the plasma and accumulated in the spleen (Table 1). Furthermore, as the spleen and BM are both target tissues of MPNs, we analyzed the histology and the key proteins of BM. As shown in Fig. 5G, FM therapy reduced myelo-erythroid infiltration and caused p-STAT3 and p-STAT5 downregulation at 12 h from the last administration. These results further illustrated the potential of FM to suppress disease progression with decreased systemic toxicity.
At 12 h following administration, the tumor burden in the plasma and spleen was the lowest (Fig. 5D), whereas the FM concentration was the highest in the spleen (Fig. 5B). There was no significant difference in FM exposure AUC(0–24 h) in the plasma and tissues between single and repeated administration of FM, implying that the repeated administrations of FM did not cause accumulation in the body and toxicity (Table 1). Moreover, the bioavailability of FM in rats and dogs was nearly 60%, whereas it was found to be 19% in rats and 37% in dogs for fedratinib (data not shown). These results illustrated the rationality and feasibility of twice-daily administration of FM and showed good PK/PD characteristics and low toxicity.
Efficacy of FM in JAK2 V617F-induced BMT myelofibrosis model
To further assess the therapeutic efficacy of FM in primary MF, we employed a JAK2V617F-induced primary MF mouse model (Fig. 6A), which could imitate the pathogenesis of patients with clinical MF. On day 14 post-BMT, 13.53 ± 2.64% of GFP+Gr1+ cells were examined in PB (Fig. S5A). Subsequently, the mice were randomized into five groups and received different doses of FM or fedratinib treatment. As the treatment progressed, GFP+ Gr1+ cells were significantly reduced (Fig. S5C). The median survival time of mice was >180 days in FM-treated (15, 30, and 45 mg/kg) groups and fedratinib-treated (30 mg/kg) group vs. 133.5 days in the vehicle group (Fig. 6B). Although there was no significant difference between FM and fedratinib in the median survival time of mice in the 30 mg/kg groups, FM exhibited a stronger therapeutic effect on splenomegaly than fedratinib at the same dose (p = 0.0158) (Fig. 6C). The splenomegaly was dose-dependently inhibited, and the inhibition of splenomegaly was 97.11%, 101.62%, and 101.24% at FM doses of 15, 30, and 45 mg/kg, respectively, whereas it was 90.56% in the fedratinib 30 mg/kg group (Fig. 6C). The spleen of mice treated with FM 30 mg/kg recovered to the normal level. In addition, compared with the vehicle group, the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in PB of mice were significantly and dose-dependently suppressed by FM treatment (Fig. 6D).
To determine the effects of FM on various hematopoietic cell compartments and differentiation stages, we then analyzed the tumor burden in the spleen (Fig. 6E) and BM (Fig. S5D). FM exhibited a noticeable reduction in the proportion of granulocytes (Gr1+), macrophages (Mac1+), GFP+CD71+ cells (early erythroid progenitors), and GFP+Ter119+ cells (late erythroid progenitors) compared to the vehicle mice, while the proportion of B220+ cells (B cells) increased, reaching the level of normal mice (Figs. 6E and S5D). JAK2V617F BMT mice induced an increase in WBCs and HCT, but after FM treatment, the number of WBCs and HCT decreased (Figs. 6F and S5B). These data revealed that FM was effective in various hematopoietic cell compartments.
Further analysis of the spleen of the vehicle mice showed that a large number of tumor cells infiltrated into the red pulp, and the dense tissue structure was destroyed in the vehicle group (Fig. 6G). However, after FM treatment, tumor cell infiltration in the spleen was repressed in a dose-dependent manner, and the spleen structure gradually returned to the normal tissue structure. The IHC results showed that p-JAK2 and p-STAT5 were significantly inhibited by FM. Importantly, we observed severe reticular fibrosis (black filamentous substance) in the spleen and BM of mice in the vehicle group. As shown in Fig. 6G, the vehicle-treated group were myelofibrosis-3 (MF-3) in the spleen and MF-2 in BM, respectively, based on BM fibrosis grading criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) [44]. FM treatment effectively inhibited the progression of reticular fibrosis and almost completely inhibited the MF progress at FM 30 and 45 mg/kg with non-MF in BM. Both FM and fedratinib could effectively inhibit reticular fibrosis in the spleen and BM, and there was no significant difference between FM and fedratinib at the same dose (Fig. 6G). To further understand the effect of FM on normal mice and normal human CD34+ cells, we conducted a further analysis on CD34+ cells and the results indicated that FM may have potential myelosuppressive effects (Fig. S6A–B). Overall, these findings indicated that FM was highly effective in the JAK2V617F BMT myelofibrosis model and had no significant toxicity during long-term treatment.
Effects of FM on erythroid progenitor cell growth and JAK2 signaling of primary JAK2 V617F cells from patients with MPNs
To investigate the efficacy of FM on primary cells acquired from the patients with MPNs carrying JAK2V617F mutation, colony formation assays were conducted using mononuclear cells acquired from the PB or BM of patients with MPNs. The features of patients with MPNs are described in Table S1. FM showed a stronger inhibitory effect on burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E), and it also inhibited colony-forming unit-megakaryocytes (CFU-M) and colony-forming unit-granulocytes, erythrocytes, monocytes, and megakaryocytes (CFU-GEMM) compared with the non-treatment group (Fig. 7A). To explore the impact of erythropoietin (EPO) on colony formation, colony formation repression via FM was examined in an EPO-independent medium. In the EPO-free medium, the inhibitory effect of FM on colonies was more obvious than that with EPO medium in patients with MPNs and JAK2V617F mutation (Fig. 7A).
We next assessed the expression of p-STAT3/5 in patients 2#, 4#, and 5#, and FM showed robust inhibition in JAK-STAT signaling (Fig. 7B). These results indicated that FM had a potent therapeutic effect on primary JAK2V617F cells from patients with MPNs.
Discussion
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway participates in cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and immune regulation [45, 46], and STATs are direct substrates of JAKs, which can transmit signal agents to the nucleus and regulate the expression of specific genes [47, 48]. Hyperactivation of JAK2 triggered by the JAK2V617F mutation leads to MPNs [49, 50]. As marketed drugs for the treatment of MPNs, ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, and fedratinib is a JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor. Both of them bind to the JAK2 JH1 domain, which may be the reason why their selectivity is not sufficiently high, and they cause significant side effects [32, 33]. JAK2V617F mutation is located in the JAK2 JH2 domain. Thus, targeting JAK2 JH2 is more conducive to the treatment of MPNs [27, 51].
Through extensive studies on the binding mode of the dual JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor pacritinib, it was found that the 4-substituent pyrimidine-2-amine pharmacophore of pacritinib was crucial to maintain the ATP domain binding group for JAK2. According to the computer-aided drug design instruction, we designed pyrazole instead of phenyl to increase the enzymatic activity for JAK2/FLT3 and also introduced a series of hydrophile groups in the benzene ring to improve the oral bioavailability. After structure-activity relationship discussion, metabolic stability, in vitro and in vivo activity screening, and toxicity evaluation, we finally selected the compound FM as a clinical candidate compound.
Our study has demonstrated the high selectivity of FM for JAK2 over other JAK isotypes. It has been known that the marketed JAK2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib bind to the ATP site of the catalytic domain JAK2 JH1 [52]. However, FM is different from previous JAK2 inhibitors because of its unique ability to selectively bind to the JH2 domain of JAK2, exerting its function through an allosteric mechanism. FM has a stronger affinity for JH2 than for JH1 of JAK2, and the crystal structure of the complex JAK2 JH2 and FM showed that FM could stably bind to the JAK2 JH2 protein. Therefore, FM may avoid the high effect inhibition of other JAK subtypes and improve the selectivity of JAK2.
The antitumor activity of FM on JAK2 and FLT3 mutant cell lines showed that the anti-proliferative IC50 of FM was better than that of ruxolitinib and fedratinib. The p-JAK2, p-STAT5, p-STAT3, and p-ERK protein levels were significantly downregulated by FM in both JAK2 and FLT3 mutated cell lines. Moreover, FM could significantly inhibit the growth of erythroid progenitor cells and JAK2 signaling in the primary cells of patients with JAK2V617F mutations.
In JAK2V617F-driven MPN models, including Ba/F3-JAK2V617F and Ba/F3-EPOR-JAK2V617F disease models, oral FM at doses of 15, 30, or 45 mg/kg twice a day could dose-dependently inhibit splenomegaly and improve survival. FM suppressed spleen and BM fibrosis and significantly inhibited the development of tumor cells in the JAK2V617F BMT mouse model. Compared with other JAK2 inhibitors, FM had a stronger affinity for the pseudokinase domain JH2 than JH1 of JAK2, and the bioavailability of FM in rats and dogs was nearly 60% as compared to 19% in rats and 37% in dogs of fedratinib. Therefore, the therapeutic effect of FM in these models was better than that of other JAK2 inhibitors. The PK/PD characteristics of FM indicate that AUC(0–24h) and Cmax exposed to the spleen are greater than that of plasma and are less distributed in the brain, suggesting that it has the potential to suppress disease progression and reduce systemic toxicity.
In summary, FM displays potent efficacy in vitro and in vivo on MPNs and possesses favorable PK/PD characteristics and low toxicity. Therefore, our preclinical study supports that FM could be a potent candidate drug for patients with JAK2-driven MPN with reduced adverse effects and better treatment outcomes than ruxolitinib and fedratinib.
Change history
26 June 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01058-y
References
Mead AJ, Mullally A. Myeloproliferative neoplasm stem cells. Blood. 2017;129:1607–16.
Deininger MWN, Tyner JW, Solary E. Turning the tide in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:425–40.
Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, East C, Fourouclas N, Swanton S, et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005;365:1054–61.
James C, Ugo V, Le Couédic JP, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C, et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature. 2005;434:1144–8.
Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, Teo SS, Tiedt R, Passweg JR, et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1779–90.
Levine RL, Wadleigh M, Cools J, Ebert BL, Wernig G, Huntly BJ, et al. Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:387–97.
Barosi G, Klersy C, Villani L, Bonetti E, Catarsi P, Poletto V, et al. JAK2(V617F) allele burden ⩾50% is associated with response to ruxolitinib in persons with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and splenomegaly requiring therapy. Leukemia. 2016;30:1772–5.
Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V, et al. JAK inhibition with Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:787–98.
Chase A, Bryant C, Score J, Haferlach C, Grossmann V, Schwaab J, et al. Ruxolitinib as potential targeted therapy for patients with JAK2 rearrangements. Haematologica. 2013;98:404–8.
Barosi G, Zhang MJ, Gale RP. Does Ruxolitinib improve survival of persons with MPN-associated myelofibrosis? Should it? Leukemia. 2014;28:2267–70.
Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Griesshammer M, Masszi T, Durrant S, Passamonti F, et al. Ruxolitinib versus standard therapy for the treatment of polycythemia vera. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:426–35.
Harrison C, Vannucchi AM. Ruxolitinib: A potent and selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor in patients with myelofibrosis. An update for clinicians. Ther Adv Hematol. 2012;3:341–54.
Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:799–807.
Verstovsek S, Gotlib J, Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Cervantes F, et al. Long-term survival in patients treated with Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: COMFORT-I and -II pooled analyses. J Hematol Oncol 2017;10:156.
Kiladjian JJ, Zachee P, Hino M, Pane F, Masszi T, Harrison CN, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in polycythaemia vera (RESPONSE): 5-year follow up of a phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e226–e237.
Shimoda K, Feng J, Murakami H, Nagata S, Watling D, Rogers NC, et al. Jak1 plays an essential role for receptor phosphorylation and Stat activation in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 1997;90:597–604.
Kleppe M, Spitzer MH, Li S, Hill CE, Dong L, Papalexi E, et al. Jak1 integrates cytokine sensing to regulate hematopoietic stem cell function and stress hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell.2017;21:489–501.e7.
Gruber CN, Calis JJA, Buta S, Evrony G, Martin JC, Uhl SA, et al. Complex autoinflammatory syndrome unveils fundamental principles of JAK1 kinase transcriptional and biochemical function. Immunity. 2020;53:672–84.e11.
Jamieson C, Hasserjian R, Gotlib J, Cortes J, Stone R, Talpaz M, et al. Effect of treatment with a JAK2-selective inhibitor, fedratinib, on bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myelofibrosis. J Transl Med. 2015;13:294.
Talpaz M, Kiladjian JJ. Fedratinib, a newly approved treatment for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2021;35:1–17.
Blair HA. Fedratinib: first approval. Drugs. 2019;79:1719–25.
Pardanani A, Harrison C, Cortes JE, Cervantes F, Mesa RA, Milligan D, et al. Safety and efficacy of Fedratinib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:643–51.
Saharinen P, Takaluoma K, Silvennoinen O. Regulation of the Jak2 tyrosine kinase by its pseudokinase domain. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:3387–95.
Saharinen P, Vihinen M, Silvennoinen O. Autoinhibition of Jak2 tyrosine kinase is dependent on specific regions in its pseudokinase domain. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:1448–59.
Matsuda T, Feng J, Witthuhn BA, Sekine Y, Ihle JN. Determination of the transphosphorylation sites of Jak2 kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;325:586–94.
Feener EP, Rosario F, Dunn SL, Stancheva Z, Myers MG Jr. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak2 in the JH2 domain inhibits cytokine signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:4968–78.
Sanz A, Ungureanu D, Pekkala T, Ruijtenbeek R, Touw IP, Hilhorst R, et al. Analysis of Jak2 catalytic function by peptide microarrays: The role of the JH2 domain and V617F mutation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18522.
Leroy E, Dusa A, Colau D, Motamedi A, Cahu X, Mouton C, et al. Uncoupling JAK2 V617F activation from cytokine-induced signalling by modulation of JH2 αC helix. Biochem J. 2016;473:1579–91.
Bandaranayake RM, Ungureanu D, Shan Y, Shaw DE, Silvennoinen O, Hubbard SR. Crystal structures of the JAK2 pseudokinase domain and the pathogenic mutant V617F. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:754–9.
Silvennoinen O, Ungureanu D, Niranjan Y, Hammaren H, Bandaranayake R, Hubbard SR. New insights into the structure and function of the pseudokinase domain in JAK2. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41:1002–7.
Gnanasambandan K, Magis A, Sayeski PP. The constitutive activation of Jak2-V617F is mediated by a pi stacking mechanism involving phenylalanines 595 and 617. Biochemistry. 2010;49:9972–84.
Chang Y, Min J, Jarusiewicz JA, Actis M, Yu-Chen Bradford SY, Mayasundari A, et al. Degradation of Janus kinases in CRLF2-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2021;138:2313–26. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020006846
Davis RR, Li B, Yun SY, Chan A, Nareddy P, Gunawan S, et al. Structural insights into JAK2 inhibition by Ruxolitinib, Fedratinib, and derivatives thereof. J Med Chem. 2021;64:2228–41.
Wrobleski ST, Moslin R, Lin S, Zhang Y, Spergel S, Kempson J, et al. Highly selective inhibition of tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) for the treatment of autoimmune diseases: discovery of the allosteric inhibitor BMS-986165. J Med Chem. 2019;62:8973–95.
Yang T, Hu M, Qi W, Yang Z, Tang M, He J, et al. Discovery of potent and orally effective dual Janus kinase 2/FLT3 inhibitors for the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia and myeloproliferative neoplasms. J Med Chem. 2019;62:10305–20.
Quintás-Cardama A, Vaddi K, Liu P, Manshouri T, Li J, Scherle PA, et al. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: Therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:3109–17.
Wernig G, Kharas MG, Okabe R, Moore SA, Leeman DS, Cullen DE, et al. Efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in treatment of a murine model of JAK2V617F-induced polycythemia vera. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:311–20.
Hart S, Goh KC, Novotny-Diermayr V, Hu CY, Hentze H, Tan YC, et al. SB1518, a novel macrocyclic pyrimidine-based JAK2 inhibitor for the treatment of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. Leukemia. 2011;25:1751–9.
Pardanani A, Lasho T, Smith G, Burns CJ, Fantino E, Tefferi A. CYT387, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor: in vitro assessment of kinase selectivity and preclinical studies using cell lines and primary cells from polycythemia vera patients. Leukemia. 2009;23:1441–5.
Forster M, Chaikuad A, Dimitrov T, Döring E, Holstein J, Berger BT, et al. Development, optimization, and structure-activity relationships of covalent-reversible JAK3 inhibitors based on a tricyclic imidazo[5,4- d]pyrrolo[2,3- b]pyridine scaffold. J Med Chem.2018;61:5350–66.
Pei H, He L, Shao M, Yang Z, Ran Y, Li D, et al. Discovery of a highly selective JAK3 inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5273.
Staerk J, Kallin A, Royer Y, Diaconu CC, Dusa A, Demoulin JB, et al. JAK2, the JAK2 V617F mutant and cytokine receptors. Pathol Biol. 2007;55:88–91.
Anbinselvam A, Sidharthan N, Vidyadharan G, Kurian J, Biswas L. Mutation profile of JAK2, EPOR and CALR genes in polycythemia patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2020;82:102414.
Gianelli U, Vener C, Bossi A, Cortinovis I, Iurlo A, Fracchiolla NS, et al. The European Consensus on grading of bone marrow fibrosis allows a better prognostication of patients with primary myelofibrosis. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1193–202.
Villarino AV, Gadina M, O’Shea JJ, Kanno Y. SnapShot: Jak-STAT signaling II. Cell.2020;181:1696–1696.e1.
Kisseleva T, Bhattacharya S, Braunstein J, Schindler CW. Signaling through the JAK/STAT pathway, recent advances and future challenges. Gene. 2002;285:1–24.
Quintás-Cardama A, Verstovsek S. Molecular pathways: Jak/STAT pathway: Mutations, inhibitors, and resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1933–40.
Vainchenker W, Constantinescu SN. JAK/STAT signaling in hematological malignancies. Oncogene. 2013;32:2601–13.
Gäbler K, Behrmann I, Haan C. JAK2 mutants (e.g., JAK2V617F) and their importance as drug targets in myeloproliferative neoplasms. JAK-Stat 2013;2:e25025.
Li B, Rampal RK, Xiao Z. Targeted therapies for myeloproliferative neoplasms. Biomark Res. 2019;7:15.
Dusa A, Mouton C, Pecquet C, Herman M, Constantinescu SN. JAK2 V617F constitutive activation requires JH2 residue F595: A pseudokinase domain target for specific inhibitors. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11157.
Bryan MC, Rajapaksa NS. Kinase inhibitors for the treatment of immunological disorders: Recent advances. J Med Chem. 2018;61:9030–58.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Research of the 1.1-type new drug “Flonoltinib” for the treatment of myelofibrosis (HX-H1908170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: L.C. and T.N. Acquisition of data (animal procedures, patient management, sample collection, facility provision, etc.): M.H., J.Z., L.Y., L.N., and X.Y. Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): M.H., T.Y., M.S., Q.C., and M.T. Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: L.C., M.H., T.Y., A.Z., and L.Y. Study supervision: L.C., T.N., H.Y., J.Y., H.P., Z.Y.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, M., Yang, T., Yang, L. et al. Preclinical studies of Flonoltinib Maleate, a novel JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, in treatment of JAK2V617F-induced myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood Cancer J. 12, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00628-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00628-2
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Mechanisms and therapeutic prospect of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in liver cancer
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2024)