Introduction

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that causes progressive destruction of the periodontium, a highly hierarchically organized organ that includes alveolar bone, periodontal ligament (PDL) and root cementum, and if left untreated, this disease causes tooth movement and eventually leads to tooth loss.1,2 In support of combating tissue loss, techniques ranging from guided tissue regeneration (GTR) to bone grafting and, more recently, stem cell-based regenerative therapies have either been used or paved the way for the current protocols for periodontal treatment.3,4,5 Unfortunately, these therapeutic paradigms are either classified as crude “regeneration-promoting” methods or have poor clinical predictability. The successful regeneration of lost/damaged periodontal tissues remains a challenge due to the difficulty of tissue regrowth within an inflammatory environment and the need to reconstruct at least three types of tissues as an integrated, functional unit.3,4,5,6 As a fundamental component of the tooth-supporting apparatus, the cementum is responsible for connecting the PDL to the tooth and thus plays a vitally important role in restoring tooth function; however, the regeneration of damaged cementum on a diseased root surface has not been successfully achieved in the field of regenerative medicine.6,7,8

The postnatal PDL constitutes an important stem cell source, i.e., PDL stem cells (PDLSCs) that have been proven to differentiate into osteoblasts, fibroblasts and cementoblasts under appropriate conditions, wherein cementoblasts are the progenitor responsible for cementum regeneration and the specialized cell type that can form mineralized cementum tissue.9,10 Although PDLSCs can give rise to osteoblastic and cementoblastic lineages and represent the optimal candidate for periodontal regeneration, substantial evidence suggests that PDLSCs within a diseased periodontium exhibit a compromised function and are thus unable to properly differentiate into the required cell types to form correct periodontal tissues.9,11,12,13,14,15 By targeting the osteogenesis of PDLSCs, we identified the P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) as a key molecule that can be used to reverse the inflammation-compromised osteogenesis of PDLSCs.16 Via a paracrine mechanism, the overexpression of P2X7R allowed PDLSCs to exert positive effects on their neighboring cells, which protected them against inflammation and thus ensured appropriate osteogenic differentiation.13 In regard to the cementogenesis of PDLSCs, emerging evidence has indicated that inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-1β, inhibit cementoblastic differentiation at least partially by targeting miR-155-3p or miR-325-3p.9,12,17 We are also beginning to understand the mechanism through which macrophages in a proinflammatory/immunoregulatory state affect the differentiation of PDLSCs into cementoblasts,9 but the cellular and molecular events underlying regulation of inflammation-mediated cementogenesis are still unclear. New insights into the inflammation-mediated cementogenesis of cells are crucial for the design and development of next-generation regenerative therapeutics that can achieve integrated periodontal regeneration in an inflammatory environment, including the root cementum.

Mitochondria are a fundamental central modulator of successful cell differentiation and are one of the most vulnerable organelles during inflammation-induced cell dysfunction.18,19,20,21,22 However, the role of mitochondrial function and downstream signaling molecules in regulating inflammation-induced changes to the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs remains unclear. In recent years, accumulating data have confirmed the importance of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), an RNA molecule with a length between 200 and 100 000 nucleotides (nt) without protein-coding potential, in many physiological processes, such as organism development and cell differentiation.23,24,25,26,27 Importantly, lncRNAs have been found to actively participate in the regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics or metabolism and are either located within or outside of the mitochondrial compartment.28,29,30 Unlike short microRNAs, lncRNAs are long enough to form a variety of intramolecular RNA-RNA interactions, which allows them to form a complex three-dimensional structure; the unique physical characteristics of lncRNAs allow their binding to mitochondrion-regulating proteins and the modulation of their stability, phosphorylation and/or relocalization.28,31,32 In this regard, we hypothesize that lncRNAs are potential active molecules that play a critical role in the damage to mitochondrial function and cementogenesis induced by inflammation.

To test our hypothesis and to investigate the underlying mechanism, we established an artificial inflammatory environment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α plus interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) to monitor the inflammation-induced changes in mitochondrial function and cementogenesis of PDLSCs. Mechanistically, we screened and identified the key lncRNAs involved in the cementoblastic differentiation and mitochondrial function of PDLSCs mediated by inflammation. Furthermore, potential proteins that can bind to the identified lncRNAs and modulate the mitochondrial bioenergetics and/or metabolism of PDLSCs were identified and verified. Our aim was to provide new insights into the cellular and molecular events underlying the cementogenesis of cells in an inflammatory environment and thus to provide new potential therapeutic targets for achieving cementum regeneration in future mainstream periodontal tissue engineering strategies.

Results

Inflammatory cytokines compromise the cementogenesis of PDLSCs

Human PDLSCs were successfully obtained from the permanent teeth of 7 donors (Fig. S1a), and their abilities to proliferate and differentiate into osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic lineages were confirmed by colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assays (Fig. S1b), flow cytometric analysis (Fig. S1c), CCK-8 assays (Fig. S1d) and analyses of their multidifferentiation potential (Fig. S1e).

Based on our previously established protocols,9,16 complete medium with 100 μg·mL−1 enamel matrix derivative (EMD, Emdogain®) was used to establish cementoblastic conditions for the induction of cementoblastic differentiation, and the addition of 10 ng·mL−1 TNF-α plus 5 ng·mL−1 IL-1β to the cell culture media created an inflammatory environment to identify how the presence of inflammatory cytokines influences the cementoblastic differentiation of cells. Here, PDLSCs incubated in normal and inflammatory environments were designated the Nor and Infla groups, respectively, and the EMD and Infla-EMD groups were created by addition of EMD to the aforementioned normal and inflammatory environments, respectively. After 7 days of induction, the cementoblastic differentiation potential of PDLSCs in each group was evaluated. Based on a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay, the cells in the Infla-EMD group exhibited markedly lower expression levels of cell cementoblastic differentiation-related genes (BSP, CAP and CEMP-1) than the cells in the EMD group (Fig. 1a). Similarly, the incubation of cells in an inflammatory environment (Infla-EMD group) significantly decreased the levels of cell cementoblastic differentiation-related proteins (BSP, CAP and CEMP-1) (Western blot; Fig. 1b, c). Furthermore, the cells in the EMD group were more likely to show positive staining for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (Fig. 1d) and exhibited higher cellular ALP activity than those in the Infla-EMD group (Fig. 1e).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Inflammatory cytokines compromise the cementogenesis of PDLSCs. The cells were incubated in normal α-MEM (Nor), medium with the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β (Infla), medium with the cementoblastic inducer EMD (EMD), or medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (Infla-EMD). a Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression levels of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 determined by qRT-PCR. b Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related protein expression of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 determined by Western blots. c Semiquantitative analysis of protein expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density. d ALP staining (scale bar: 500 μm) of PDLSCs. e Quantification of ALP activity. The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n from 4 to 9; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

To evaluate how inflammation influences cell cementogenesis in vivo, we incubated PDLSCs in a normal or inflammatory environment with EMD and 50 μg·mL−1 vitamin C (Vc) supplementation (EMD and Infla-EMD groups, respectively) for 14 days, and the obtained cell sheets combined with treated dentin matrix (TDM) were then subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice. At 8 weeks post-implantation, markedly higher CAP and CEMP-1 expression and more cementum-like tissue formation were observed in the transplants derived from the EMD group than in those from the Infla-EMD group (Fig. S2). Consistent with the in vitro data, the in vivo outcomes also indicate that inflammatory cytokines could compromise the cementogenesis of PDLSCs.

Inflammatory cytokines cause mitochondrial dysfunction of PDLSCs during cementoblastic differentiation

Mitochondria, the major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS), reportedly play central roles in cell differentiation.18,33 Based on the reported literature,34,35 the levels of cellular ROS, mitochondrial ROS (mtROS), mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), intracellular adenosine 5ʹ-triphosphate (ATP) content, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content, mitochondrial morphology, mitochondrial respiratory chain complex and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) were used as vital indicators to assess the effects of inflammatory cytokines on the mitochondrial function of PDLSCs in the present study. Cellular ROS and mtROS levels were applied to identify an appropriate duration for detecting the mitochondrial function of PDLSCs, and the results revealed significantly different cellular ROS and mtROS levels between the Infla-EMD and EMD groups at Day 3 (Fig. S3 and S4). Therefore, a 3-day incubation period was selected to explore the mitochondrial function of PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment in the present study.

Consistent with the cellular ROS and mtROS levels, after a 3-day exposure to inflammatory cytokines, the PDLSCs from the Infla and Infla-EMD groups showed significant decreases in the MMP compared with those in the Nor and EMD groups, respectively (Fig. 2a and b). Similarly, the intracellular ATP content of the cells in the Infla-EMD group was significantly lower than that of the cells in the EMD group (Fig. 2c). However, markedly higher levels of mtDNA were found in the cells from the Infla-EMD group than in the cells from the EMD group (Fig. 2d). Because mitochondrial morphology is inherently correlated with its function,36 we observed mitochondria in the cells from the various groups by transmission electron microscopy. The mitochondria in the cells from the Infla and Infla-EMD groups exhibited significant morphological defects, including swelling and an altered mitochondrial matrix density (Fig. 2e). Because mitochondrial function or the capacity to supply energy through OXPHOS is key for cell differentiation,37 the OCR of the PDLSCs from the EMD and Infla-EMD groups was analyzed using a Seahorse Bioscience XF Analyzer. The data showed that incubation in an inflammatory environment (Infla-EMD group) markedly decreased the cellular respiration and mitochondrial ATP production of PDLSCs (Fig. 2f-i). However, in terms of maximal respiration, no significant difference was found between the PDLSCs from the EMD group and those from the Infla-EMD group (Fig. 2h). These data reveal that cells exhibit mitochondrial impairment and dysfunction in response to inflammatory incubation. Moreover, the expression of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I/II in the PDLSCs in the Infla-EMD group was significantly lower than that in the EMD group (Fig. S5).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Inflammatory cytokines cause mitochondrial dysfunction in PDLSCs during cementoblastic differentiation. The cells were incubated in normal α-MEM (Nor), medium with the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β (Infla), medium with the cementoblastic inducer EMD (EMD), or medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (Infla-EMD). a The MMP was determined using a JC-1 probe (immunofluorescence staining; scale bar: 200 μm). b Quantification of the MMP (reflected by the relative ratio of red/green fluorescence intensity of JC-1). c Intracellular ATP contents determined by ATP assays. d mtDNA content determined by qRT-PCR. e Morphometric analysis of mitochondria by transmission electron microscopy (yellow arrows indicate healthy mitochondria, red arrows indicate swollen mitochondria; scale bar: 500 nm). f The OCR of PDLSCs determined using a Seahorse Bioscience XF Analyzer; arrows indicate the sequential injection of the ATPase inhibitor Oligo (1 μmol·L−1), the uncoupling reagent carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP, 1 μmol·L−1) and inhibitors of the electron transport chain rotenone/antimycin (R/A, 2 μmol·L−1). g Quantification of maximal respiration (differences between the maximum rate measurement after FCCP injection and the minimum rate measurement after R/A injection). h Quantification of cellular respiration (basic OCR value prior to Oligo injection). i Quantification of ATP production (difference between final rate measurement prior to Oligo injection and minimum rate measurement after Oligo injection). The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n from 3 to 8; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

Mitochondrial function is required for the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs in either noninflammatory or inflammatory environments

To elucidate the role of mitochondrial function in the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs, we observed how the changes in the mitochondrial function of cells correlate with cementoblastic differentiation in either a noninflammatory or an inflammatory environment. Based on the reported data38,39,40 and our own examinations (Fig. S6), PDLSCs were pretreated with an ROS generator (10 μmol·L−1 H2O2) or mitochondrial inhibitor (10 μg·mL−1 oligomycin, Oligo) for 24 h to inhibit cell mitochondrial function, whereas the cells were incubated for 2 h with an ROS scavenger (1 mmol·L−1 N-acetylcysteine, NAC) or mitochondrial antioxidant (20 nmol·L−1 Visomitin) to enhance the mitochondrial function of the cells. As demonstrated by qRT-PCR and Western blot assays, treatment with either H2O2 or Oligo significantly decreased the expression of cementoblastic differentiation-related genes/proteins in the PDLSCs incubated in medium with EMD (a noninflammatory environment) (Fig. 3a–c). In contrast, we found that reversing inflammation-induced mitochondrial dysfunction with NAC or Visomitin rescued the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs (Fig. 3d–f). Thus, mitochondrial function is closely correlated with the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs, regardless of whether the cells were incubated in a noninflammatory or an inflammatory environment. The relationship between mitochondrial function and cell cementogenesis was further confirmed by clinical evidence, which showed that periodontitis-induced cementum destruction was accompanied by higher mtROS and intracellular ROS levels in the gingival tissues derived from periodontally diseased teeth than in the gingival tissues of healthy teeth (Fig. S7).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mitochondrial function is required for the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs in either noninflammatory or inflammatory environments. ac Mitochondrial dysfunction impairs the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs. The cells were incubated in medium with EMD (noninflammatory environment). a Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression levels of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 in the PDLSCs without (control) or with pretreatment with 10 μmol·L−1 H2O2 (H2O2) or 10 μg·mL−1 Oligo (Oligo) for 24 h (qRT-PCR). b Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related protein expression of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 in the PDLSCs without (control) or with pretreatment with 10 μmol·L−1 H2O2 (H2O2) or 10 μg·mL−1 Oligo (Oligo) for 24 h (Western blot). c Semiquantitative analysis of the protein expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density. df Reversing inflammation-induced mitochondrial dysfunction rescued the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs. The cells were incubated in medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (inflammatory environment). d Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression levels of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 in the PDLSCs without (control) or with pretreatment with 1 mmol·L−1 NAC (NAC) or 20 nmol·L−1 Visomitin (Visomitin) for 2 h (qRT-PCR). e Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related protein expression of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 in the PDLSCs without (control) or with pretreatment with 1 mmol·L−1 NAC (NAC) or 20 nmol·L−1 Visomitin (Visomitin) for 2 h (Western blot). f Semiquantitative analysis of protein expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density. The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n from 6 to 9; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

Identification and validation of gastric cancer associated transcript 2 (GACAT2) as a key lncRNA associated with the cementoblastic differentiation and mitochondrial function of PDLSCs

Given that lncRNAs are key regulators in cell differentiation,24,25,27,41 differentially expressed lncRNAs (P < 0.05 and fold change > 1.5) between the PDLSCs incubated in a noninflammatory environment (EMD group) and those incubated in an inflammatory environment (Infla-EMD group) were identified by lncRNA microarray analysis. As a result, 1 032 lncRNAs were shown to have significantly upregulated expression and 909 lncRNAs had significantly downregulated expression in the cells from the Infla-EMD group compared with those from the EMD group (Fig. 4a), and the names of the top 8 lncRNAs with upregulated expression and the top 8 with downregulated expression were presented in the heatmap in Fig. 4b. From the 16 lncRNAs, AL390957.1, LINC01638, AC010247.2, AC096773.1, LINC01133 and GACAT2 had an appropriate RNA length (< 2,000 nt), had a raw signal intensity >100, did not overlap with coding transcripts and were included in a database (in GENCODE or RefSeq public databases); thus, these lncRNAs were selected (Table S1) and then subjected to qRT-PCR verification, and 10 other lncRNAs were excluded. Based on the qRT-PCR assay, only 4 lncRNAs (AC010247.2, AC096773.1, LINC01133 and GACAT2) were in fact differentially expressed between the EMD and Infla-EMD groups (Fig. 4e-h), whereas no significant changes in the AL390957.1 and LINC01638 expression levels were found between the two groups (Fig. 4c, d). Thus, AC010247.2, AC096773.1, LINC01133 and GACAT2 were selected for further investigation, and the other 2 lncRNAs (AL390957.1 and LINC01638) were excluded.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Identification and validation of GACAT2 as a key lncRNA associated with the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs. a–h Identification of differentially expressed lncRNAs between the PDLSCs incubated in noninflammatory environments and the PDLSCs incubated in inflammatory environments. The cells were incubated in medium with the cementoblastic inducer EMD alone (EMD) or EMD plus inflammatory cytokines (Infla-EMD). a Volcano plots of the differentially expressed (fold change >1.5 and adjusted P < 0.05) lncRNAs in the PDLSCs between the EMD and Infla-EMD groups. b Heatmap of the top 8 lncRNAs with upregulated expression and the top 8 lncRNAs with downregulated expression in the PDLSCs of the EMD group compared with those in the Infla-EMD group. Six lncRNAs, AL390957.1 (c), LINC01638 (d), AC010247.2 (e), AC096773.1 (f), LINC01133 (g), and GACAT2 (h), were selected for qRT-PCR verification according to their RNA length (<2 000 nt), intensity (>100), relation (without overlapping with coding transcripts) and database source (in the GENCODE or RefSeq public databases), and 10 other lncRNAs were excluded. c and d No significant changes in AL390957.1 and LINC01638 expression were observed in the cells incubated in the noninflammatory or inflammatory environments. e and f AC010247.2 and AC096773.1 expression was significantly increased in an inflammatory environment. g and h LINC01133 and GACAT2 expression was significantly decreased in an inflammatory environment. i The inhibition of AC096773.1 (si-AC096773.1), but not AC010247.2 (si-AC010247.2), increased the relative cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression levels of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 in the PDLSCs incubated in an inflammatory environment (qRT-PCR). j The inhibition of LINC01133 (si-LINC01133) or GACAT2 (si-GACAT2) decreased the relative cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression levels of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 in the PDLSCs incubated in a noninflammatory environment (qRT-PCR); the most significant change was observed in response to GACAT2 inhibition. The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n from 3 to 6; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

To identify which of the 4 selected lncRNAs were linked to cementoblastic differentiation, we determined the changes in cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression in PDLSCs in response to the knockdown of each lncRNA. Given that the expression of AC010247.2 and AC096773.1 was significantly increased in an inflammatory environment (Fig. 4e, f), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were used to silence their expression in cells incubated in an inflammatory environment. In contrast, LINC01133 and GACAT2 expression was significantly decreased in an inflammatory environment (Fig. 4g, h), and siRNAs were used to silence the expression of LINC01133 and GACAT2 in a noninflammatory environment. After the knockdown efficacy of each lncRNA (AC010247.2, AC096773.1, LINC01133 or GACAT2) in PDLSCs was validated (Fig. S8), the expression of cementoblastic differentiation-related genes in the PDLSCs transfected with the corresponding siRNAs was evaluated by qRT-PCR. For the 4 potential target lncRNAs, the inhibition of LINC01133 or GACAT2 significantly influenced the expression levels of all cementoblastic differentiation-related genes (BSP, CAP and CEMP-1), whereas the inhibition of AC096773.1 only affected CAP and CEMP-1 expression in PDLSCs, and the inhibition of AC010247.2 did not affect the expression of any cementoblastic differentiation-related genes (Fig. 4i, j). Hence, in this study, we concluded that LINC01133 and GACAT2 were closely related to cell cementoblastic differentiation. The comparison of gene expression in the PDLSCs transfected with si-GACAT2 or si-LINC01133 showed that si-GACAT2 transfection led to lower levels of cementoblastic differentiation-related genes (vs. si-LINC01133 transfection) (Fig. 4j). Therefore, GACAT2 was ultimately selected as the key cementoblastic differentiation-related lncRNA for further gain/loss-of-function studies of both the mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs and in-depth mechanistic investigation. Here, the clinical significance of GACAT2 in periodontitis was indirectly demonstrated by the lower expression of GACAT2 in gingival tissues from teeth with periodontitis than in those from healthy tissues (Fig. S9). Moreover, no significant changes in the GACAT2 expression levels were found between the PDLSCs from the Nor group and those from the EMD group (Fig. S10), indicating that GACAT2 was mainly influenced by an inflammatory environment during cementoblastic differentiation.

To identify whether GACAT2 is also correlated with mitochondrial function, we investigated how GACAT2 knockdown affected the mitochondrial function of PDLSCs. The mtROS levels of the cells transfected with si-GACAT2 were markedly higher than those of the cells transfected with si-NC (Fig. S11a, b). Consistently, GACAT2 knockdown decreased ATP, MMP, and mtDNA levels and the expression of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex II/III/IV/V in PDLSCs (Fig. S11c–h). Additionally, the inhibition of GACAT2 reduced the cellular respiration and mitochondrial ATP production of PDLSCs, which suggested that the ablation of GACAT2 elicits mitochondrial dysfunction in PDLSCs (Fig. S11i-l).

GACAT2 overexpression reverses inflammation-compromised cementogenesis and mitochondrial function of PDLSCs

Given that GACAT2 knockdown negatively affected the mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs in a noninflammatory environment, we then investigated how GACAT2 overexpression affected cells incubated in an inflammatory environment. Here, we overexpressed GACAT2 in the PDLSCs with lentivirus carrying GACAT2 cDNA (ov-GACAT2) (Fig. 5a) and then incubated the above stable overexpression cells in medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (inflammatory environment). Compared with ov-NC transfection, ov-GACAT2 transfection led to significantly higher BSP and CEMP-1 gene expression levels (qRT-PCR; Fig. 5b) and significantly higher BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 protein expression levels in PDLSCs (Western blot; Fig. 5c, d). In addition, GACAT2 overexpression decreased cell mtROS production (Fig. 5e, f) and induced increases in cell ATP production, MMP, mtDNA content and the expression of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I/II/III/V (Fig. 5g-l). Similarly, the cellular respiration, maximal respiration and mitochondrial ATP production of PDLSCs determined by OCR assays increased significantly following GACAT2 overexpression (Fig. 5m-p). The cells incubated in an inflammatory environment and transfected with ov-GACAT2 or ov-NC were subcutaneously transplanted into male nude mice, and the cells with stable GACAT2 expression incubated in an inflammatory environment showed increased cementogenesis-related marker expression in transplants (Fig. S12a-d) and indeed resulted in more cementum-like tissue formation on the surface of TDM bioscaffolds (Fig. S12e). Together, these data suggest that GACAT2 overexpression can reverse the inflammation-compromised cementogenesis and mitochondrial function of PDLSCs.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Overexpression of GACAT2 (ov-GACAT2) reverses the inflammation-compromised cementoblastic differentiation and mitochondrial function of PDLSCs. The cells were incubated in medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (inflammatory environment). a Overexpression efficiency of GACAT2 in PDLSCs validated by qRT-PCR. b Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression levels of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 determined by qRT-PCR. c Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related protein expression of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 determined by Western blots. d Semiquantitative analysis of protein expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density. e mtROS levels in PDLSCs determined with the aid of a MitoSOX probe (flow cytometric analysis). f Quantification of mtROS levels (reflected by the relative fluorescence intensity of MitoSOX). g Intracellular ATP contents (ATP assay). h The MMP was determined with a JC-1 probe (immunofluorescence staining; scale bar: 50 μm). i Quantification of MMP levels (reflected by the relative ratio of red/green fluorescence intensity of JC-1). j mtDNA content determined by qRT-PCR. k Relative mitochondrial complex-related protein expression of NDUFB8 (subunit of complex I), SDHA (subunit of complex II), UQCRC1 (subunit of complex III), COXIV (subunit of complex IV) and ATP5A (subunit of complex V) determined by Western blots. l Semiquantitative analysis of protein expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density. m OCR of PDLSCs determined by a Seahorse Bioscience XF Analyzer; arrows indicate the sequential injection of 1 μmol·L−1 Oligo, 1 μmol·L−1 FCCP and 2 μmol·L−1 R/A. n Quantification of cellular respiration (basic OCR value prior to Oligo injection). o Quantification of maximal respiration (differences between the maximum rate measurement after FCCP injection and the minimum rate measurement after R/A injection). p Quantification of ATP production (difference between the final rate measurement prior to Oligo injection and the minimum rate measurement after Oligo injection). The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n from 3 to 8; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

Identification and validation of pyruvate kinase M1/2 (PKM1/2) as a direct binding protein of GACAT2 that influences mitochondrial function

Given that the functions of lncRNAs are closely linked to their subcellular localization,42,43 the subcellular localization of GACAT2 in PDLSCs was determined. RNA extracted from nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions was successfully identified using a nuclear marker (U6) and cytoplasmic marker (β-actin), and the nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of GACAT2 in the PDLSCs from the Nor, EMD and Infla-EMD groups was then detected by qRT-PCR. The results revealed that GACAT2 was localized in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of PDLSCs (Fig. 6a). Similar outcomes were observed with cells detected using RNAscope® in situ RNA detection technology (RNAscope® ISH), which showed that GACAT2 was localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of PDLSCs (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, mitochondrial fractionation experiments demonstrated that GACAT2 was located in the mitochondria of PDLSCs (Fig. S13).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Identification and validation of PKM1/2 as a direct binding protein of GACAT2 that influences mitochondrial function. a and b Determination of GACAT2 localization in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of PDLSCs. The cells were incubated in normal α-MEM (Nor), medium with the cementoblastic inducer EMD (EMD), or medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (Infla-EMD). a Percentages of nuclear and cytoplasmic GACAT2 determined by qRT-PCR (U6 and β-actin served as the nuclear and cytoplasmic controls, respectively). b Subcellular localization of GACAT2 determined by the RNA SCOPE assay (scale bar: 100 μm). c GACAT2 expression was negatively correlated with mitochondrial inner membrane-associated gene signatures (GSEA). d The ChIRP method was applied to screen the potential proteins binding to GACAT2. e Heatmap of 15 GACAT2-binding proteins screened by ChIRP-MS assays (unique peptide ≥2, fold change >1.2); U1 probes were used as the positive control (U1), and nontargeting probes (control) were used as the negative control. f Quantification of labeled reference peptides for GACAT2-binding proteins (PRM assay, nontargeting probes were used as the negative control). gk Product ion pattern of the selected proteins (fold change >1.5), i.e., TXN (g), AZGP1 (h), TUBA1B (i), JUP (j) and PKM1/2 (k) (PRM assay; EKLEATINELV for the TXN protein, AGEVQEPELR for the AZGP1 protein, AVFVDLEPTVIDEVR for the TUBA1B protein, NLALCPANHAPLQEAAVIPR for the JUP protein, and IYVDDGLISLQVK for the PKM1/2 protein); nontargeting probes were used as controls; different colors indicate different fragment ions from the same polypeptide, and each peptide was quantified using fragment ions. l Chromatograph of a labeled peptide (IYVDDGLISLQVK) for the PKM1/2 protein; PKM1/2 was selected for further verification because it is more closely related to mitochondrial function than AZGP1, TUBA1B and JUP (based on information arising from the UniProt Database), and TXN was excluded from further investigation due to its inappropriate chromatography (Fig. S15). m and n Confirmation of the interaction between PKM1/2 and GACAT2 by RIP assays. The PKM1/2 protein immunoprecipitated by the anti-PKM1/2 antibody was verified by immunoblotting analysis (m), and the enrichment of GACAT2 immunoprecipitated by anti-PKM1/2 antibodies was determined by RIP assays (n) (IgG antibodies were used as the control). The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n = 3; ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

According to the literature,26,41,44,45,46 lncRNAs in the cytoplasm and nucleus could fulfill their functions by interacting with microRNAs (miRNAs) or proteins; thus, we subsequently screened GACAT2-binding mitochondrial function-related molecules. First, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that GACAT2 expression was negatively related to the mitochondrial inner membrane-associated gene signatures of PDLSCs (Fig. 6c; P < 0.05, FDR < 0.25), which was consistent with our previous findings that GACAT2 plays an essential role in regulating mitochondrial function. Subsequently, we screened GACAT2-binding miRNAs and proteins using competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) analysis and comprehensive identification of RNA-binding proteins by mass spectrometry (ChIRP-MS), respectively. The ceRNA network constructed by miRNA target prediction software (based on TargetScan and miRanda) showed that 10 mRNAs may be the final target of GACAT2 when lncRNA functions as a “sponge” to sequester miRNAs (Table S2), and qRT-PCR demonstrated that only 3 mRNAstype-1 angiotensin II receptor-associated protein (AGTRAP), zinc finger protein 672 (ZNF672) and calmodulin-like protein 3 (CALML3)—were differentially expressed in the PDLSCs transfected with ov-NC or ov-GACAT2 (Fig. S14). However, none of these molecules was reported to be tightly related to mitochondrial function. Thus, we did not further investigate GACAT2-binding miRNAs and speculated that GACAT2 may function by interacting with proteins.

Next, a ChIRP-MS assay was performed to screen for potential GACAT2-binding proteins (Fig. 6d). After an initial screening based on unique peptides (≥2) and fold change (> 1.2), ChIRP-MS analysis revealed that 15 proteins were enriched in the ChIRP lysate (Fig. 6e and Table S3). Furthermore, parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) was used to verify and quantify the labeled reference peptides of the screened GACAT2-binding proteins (Fig. 6f and Table S4). According to their fold change (>1.5), 5 proteins—thioredoxin (TXN), zinc-binding protein (AZGP1), tubulin alpha 1b (TUBA1B), junction plakoglobin (JUP), and PKM1/2—were selected as candidates for subsequent validation (Fig. 6g-l); TXN was excluded due to its inappropriate chromatography (Fig. S15). Among the 4 other candidates, PKM1/2 was ultimately selected for detailed testing because it is reportedly more closely related to mitochondrial function than AZGP1, TUBA1B and JUP.47,48 In addition, the close link between PKM1/2 and mitochondrial function is documented in the UniProt Database. The interaction of GACAT2 with PKM1/2 was verified by RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) using anti-PKM1/2 and isotype immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (control). As expected, PKM1/2 proteins were successfully precipitated by the anti-PKM1/2 antibody (Fig. 6m), and GACAT2 was significantly enriched in the PKM1/2-precipitated group compared with the IgG (control) group (Fig. 6n). Taken together, our results demonstrate that PKM1/2 is a direct binding protein of GACAT2 that influences the mitochondrial function of PDLSCs.

Overexpression/Inhibition of GACAT2 affects the expression, activity, allosteric regulation, post-translational modification and translocation of PKM1/2

We investigated how GACAT2 affects mitochondrial function by binding to PKM1/2 and found that the overexpression of GACAT2 could increase the protein expression levels of PKM1/2 and PKM2 (Fig. 7a, b), whereas GACAT2 knockdown decreased PKM1/2 and PKM2 expression (Fig. 7c, d), even though GACAT2 and PKM1/2 did not appear to affect each other at the gene level (Fig. S16). Given that pyruvate kinase (PK) can catalyze the last step of glycolysis and convert phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate,47,49 PK activity and the production of pyruvate were detected as indicators of mitochondrial metabolism. GACAT2 overexpression elevated PK activity and pyruvate production, whereas GACAT2 knockdown decreased pyruvate production (Fig. 7e-h). Furthermore, a disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) crosslinking study coupled with a Western blot assay showed that GACAT2 overexpression increased the formation of PKM2 tetramers, which are the most enzymatically active form, to exert biological functions (Fig. 7i-l). PKM2 phosphorylation on tyrosine 105 (p-PKM2), an indicator of monomer/dimer formation,50 was then measured by Western blots. The overexpression and silencing of GACAT2 increased and decreased the protein expression of p-PKM2, respectively (Fig. 7m-p). Because PKM2 mitochondrial translocation also contributes to the regulation of mitochondrial function,47,51,52 our further experiments based on immunofluorescence staining with an anti-PKM1/2 antibody and MitoTracker (mitochondrial marker) showed that GACAT2 overexpression promoted the mitochondrial translocation of PKM2 (Fig. 7q), which was consistent with the results of a mitochondrial fractionation analysis, showing that PKM2 was increased in the mitochondrial fraction of PDLSCs after GACAT2 overexpression (Fig. 7r, s).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Overexpression/inhibition of GACAT2 affects the expression, activity, allosteric regulation, post-translational modification and translocation of PKM1/2. ad Relative protein expression levels of PKM1/2, PKM1 and PKM2 in PDLSCs (with overexpression or inhibition of GACAT2) determined by Western blots and semiquantitative analysis of their expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density. The cells were transfected with ov-NC or ov-GACAT2 and incubated in medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (inflammatory environment) (a and b) or were transfected with si-NC or si-GACAT2 and incubated in medium with the cementoblastic inducer EMD (noninflammatory environment) (c and d). eh PK activity and production of pyruvate in PDLSCs (with the overexpression or inhibition of GACAT2). The cells were transfected with ov-NC or ov-GACAT2 and incubated in an inflammatory environment (e and f) or were transfected with si-NC or si-GACAT2 and incubated in a noninflammatory environment (g and h). il Tetramer, dimer and monomer levels of PKM2 in PDLSCs (with overexpression or inhibition of GACAT2) determined by western blots (i and k) and semiquantitative analysis of their expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density (j and l). The cells were transfected with ov-NC or ov-GACAT2 and incubated in an inflammatory environment (i and j) or were transfected with si-NC or si-GACAT2 and incubated in a noninflammatory environment (k and l). mp p-PKM2 in PDLSCs (with overexpression or inhibition of GACAT2) was determined by western blots and semiquantitative analysis of their expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of relative gray density. The cells were transfected with ov-NC or ov-GACAT2 and incubated in an inflammatory environment (m and n) or were transfected with si-NC or si-GACAT2 and incubated in a noninflammatory environment (o and p). q Immunofluorescence staining for mitochondria (MitoTracker, red), PKM2 (green) and DAPI (blue) in the PDLSCs transfected with ov-NC or ov-GACAT2 and incubated in an inflammatory environment (scale bar: 50 μm). r and s Relative protein expression levels of mitochondrial PKM2 in PDLSCs (with overexpression of GACAT2) determined by Western blots (r) and semiquantitative analysis of their expression levels (normalized to COXIV) in terms of relative gray density (s). The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n from 3 to 6; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

Inhibition of PKM1/2 impairs GACAT2 overexpression-rescued mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs

To determine whether binding to PKM1/2 is needed for GACAT2-mediated regulation of cell mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation, we silenced PKM1/2 with siRNAs (Fig. S16c) under GACAT2-overexpressing conditions. Functional studies revealed that GACAT2 overexpression ameliorated mitochondrial dysfunction (i.e., OCR, mtROS and ATP levels) in the Infla-EMD group; this function was abolished by transfection with si-PKM1/2 in PDLSCs (Fig. 8a–e). Similarly, the analysis of cementoblastic differentiation markers (BSP, CAP and CEMP-1) by qRT-PCR and Western blots (Fig. 8f–h) revealed that the inhibition of PKM1/2 could abolish the GACAT2 overexpression-induced increase in the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs. Thus, the function of GACAT2 in reversing the damage to mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation induced by inflammation is primarily dependent on its binding to the PKM1/2 protein.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Inhibition of PKM1/2 impairs GACAT2 overexpression-rescued mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs. The cells were transfected with ov-NC or ov-GACAT2 and incubated in medium with both inflammatory cytokines and EMD (inflammatory environment), and both ov-NC- and GACAT2-transfected cells were then further transfected with si-NC or si-PKM1/2. a OCR of PDLSCs determined by a Seahorse Bioscience XF Analyzer; arrows indicate the sequential injection of 1 μmol·L−1 Oligo, 1 μmol·L−1 FCCP and 2 μmol·L−1 R/A. b Quantification of cellular respiration (basic OCR value prior to Oligo injection), maximal respiration (differences between the maximum rate measurement after FCCP injection and the minimum rate measurement after R/A injection) and ATP production (difference between the final rate measurement prior to Oligo injection and the minimum rate measurement after Oligo injection) of PDLSCs. c mtROS levels in PDLSCs determined with the aid of a MitoSOX probe (flow cytometric analysis). d Quantification of mtROS levels (reflected by the relative fluorescence intensity of MitoSOX). e Intracellular ATP contents (ATP assay). f Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related gene expression levels of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 determined by qRT-PCR. g Relative cementoblastic differentiation-related protein expression of BSP, CAP and CEMP-1 determined by western blots. h Semiquantitative analysis of protein expression levels (normalized to β-actin) in terms of the relative gray density. i The diagram shows that the lncRNA GACAT2 plays a central role in regulating mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment. Mechanistically, it functions by binding to PKM1/2 proteins to modulate cell mitochondrial bioenergetics and/or metabolism. The data are shown as the mean ± SD for n from 3 to 8; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences between the indicated columns

Discussion

Periodontitis, a leading cause of tooth loss in adults, causes progressive destruction of the tooth-supporting apparatus, which is composed of at least three vital tissues that function together as a unit to fix the tooth to the jawbone and then to exert the appropriate chewing function.1,2,6 Because the cementum attaches PDL collagen fibers to the root surface, cementogenesis is an important prerequisite for any therapeutic paradigm that aims to restore the lost/damaged tooth-supporting structures.6,53 Although PDLSCs can give rise to the cementoblastic lineage, they inevitably show a compromised function within a diseased periodontium due to the inflammatory environment and subsequently cannot properly differentiate into cementoblasts, the only cell type that can grow cementum tissue.9,12 Here, we aimed to identify whether inflammation-compromised cementoblastic differentiation is linked to cell mitochondrial dysfunction and to monitor the key lncRNAs involved in cellular events during cementoblastic differentiation. We also investigated how these molecules modulate mitochondrial bioenergetics and/or metabolism and identified new therapeutic targets for combating inflammation-induced cell dysfunction.

Since BSP, CAP, CEMP-1, and ALP activity are known to play essential roles in regulating mineral formation, including cementum,9,54,55,56,57 they were used as cementogenesis-related markers in the present study. Similar to our reported protocols,9 EMD was used as an inducer for cell cementoblastic differentiation, and the use of EMD for cementoblastic induction is supported by its well-documented ability to promote cementoblastic differentiation in cell research and to guide new cementum formation in experimental animals.58 TNF-α and IL-1β are essential in periodontal destruction, represent proinflammatory cytokines that participate in the initiation and progression of periodontitis59,60 and hence have been used to simulate an inflammatory environment in our previous studies13,14,16 as well as in the present study. Consistent with previous findings that inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-1β, may inhibit the cementoblastic and osteogenic differentiation of cells,9,12,14,15 an adverse effect of inflammation on the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs was demonstrated in this study at the protein and gene levels (Fig. 1). Because mitochondrial dysfunction/oxidative stress is a pathogenic mechanism of many, if not all, chronic inflammatory diseases, such as periodontitis, and because mitochondria are indeed involved in many physiological processes, such as cell differentiation,18,19,22 we hypothesized that mitochondrial function could contribute to PDLSC cementoblastic differentiation in either normal or inflammatory environments.

To test this hypothesis, we detected a series of indicators, e.g., ROS levels, MMP, ATP production, mtDNA content, mitochondrial morphology, mitochondrial respiratory chain complex and OCR, to investigate the effects of inflammatory cytokines on PDLSC mitochondrial function. Unsurprisingly, we found that inflammatory cytokines elicited mitochondrial dysfunction in PDLSCs (Fig. 2, S3, S4 and S5), which is consistent with previous findings that TNF-α plus IFN-γ or IL-1β enhances ROS concentrations, inhibits mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I and/or damages mitochondrial activity, and these effects cause cell apoptosis or cartilage degradation.61,62 Furthermore, the effect of mitochondrial function on the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment was identified using an ROS generator/mitochondrial inhibitor or ROS scavenger/mitochondrial antioxidant. The results showed a link between mitochondrial dysfunction and compromised cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs, and more interestingly, we demonstrated that reversing inflammation-induced mitochondrial dysfunction could rescue the cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs (Fig. 3). These data indicate that the mitochondrial dysfunction of PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment is a main reason for their compromised cementoblastic differentiation and thus identify a new paradigm for understanding cell cementogenesis, but the downstream signaling molecules that regulate the inflammation-induced changes to the mitochondrial function of PDLSCs remain unexplored.

Multiple active molecules, particularly lncRNAs, were recently reported to be tightly related to many biological processes, particularly cell differentiation and mitochondrial activity.24,25,26,27,29,30,63 However, lncRNAs are highly species- and tissue-specific,24 and previous studies have merely investigated the physiological function of lncRNAs in a normal environment. Our study explored the role of lncRNAs in regulating mitochondrial function and cementogenesis of human PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment. A better understanding of lncRNA functions in mitochondrial activity and the related mechanisms in a diseased environment will reveal novel and unanticipated biological insights with the potential to advance our knowledge of normal physiology and disease.64 In this study, we identified GACAT2 as a key lncRNA associated with the inflammation-compromised cementogenesis of PDLSCs. Further gain/loss-of-function studies showed that GACAT2 knockdown caused mitochondrial dysfunction in PDLSCs and in turn led to impaired cementoblastic differentiation (Fig. 4 and S9); indeed, GACAT2 overexpression reversed the inflammation-compromised mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs (Fig. 5). GACAT2 (HMlincRNA717) was previously reported to be aberrantly expressed in gastric cancer tissues, gastric precancerous lesions and gastric cell lines, which indicated that GACAT2 may be pivotal in the occurrence and progression of gastric carcinoma.65,66,67 Our data provide the first indication that GACAT2 is a key regulator of mitochondrial function and may thus be targeted to reverse the cementogenesis of PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment.

Given that GACAT2 has been previously developed as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis of gastric cancer,65 we tentatively investigated the clinical significance of GACAT2 expression in gingival tissues for root cementum damage. As expected, lower GACAT2 expression was observed in gingival tissues of teeth with periodontitis with damaged cementum than in those from healthy teeth (Fig. S9). The use of GACAT2 as a biomarker for predicting cementum damage requires further study.

A key feature of lncRNAs is that a stoichiometric interaction with their target molecule(s) is needed for the regulatory effects of lncRNAs.64 Thus, for determination of how functional lncRNAs regulate mitochondrial function during the cementoblastic differentiation of cells, the screening and identification of the target(s) of lncRNAs are pivotal for establishing the plausibility of this molecular mechanism. It has been reported that lncRNAs can be located in the cytoplasm or nucleus and function in diverse ways, such as interacting with RNA-binding proteins or functioning as a “sponge” to sequester miRNAs.26,41,45,46,68 In the current study, GACAT2 was also found to be localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of PDLSCs (Fig. 6a, b), which indicated a possible mechanism through which GACAT2 might exert its biological functions via RNA-protein interactions. Moreover, GSEA predicted that GACAT2 expression was significantly related to the mitochondrial inner membrane-associated gene signatures of PDLSCs (Fig. 6c), which is consistent with the above conclusion that GACAT2 could affect mitochondrial function. Furthermore, we screened and identified GACAT2-binding proteins to explain how GACAT2 influences mitochondrial function during the cementoblastic differentiation of cells. Through ChIRP-MS, PRM and RIP assays, we confirmed that GACAT2 could directly bind to PKM1/2 (Fig. 6d-n), a molecule related to OXPHOS and ROS levels in mitochondria.47,48,49,52

The M1 form (PKM1) and M2 form (PKM2) of PK are produced from the PKM gene by differential splicing, and PK can catalyze the last step of glycolysis and convert phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate.47,49,50 In particular, PKM2, one of the major forms of PK, has been found to regulate metabolic reprogramming by multiple pathways, such as changing its expression, activity, allosteric regulation, post-translational modification and translocation.48,50 In the present study, we also found that the expression of PKM (PKM1/2 and PKM2), PK activity and pyruvate production were changed by the overexpression/inhibition of GACAT2 in PDLSCs incubated in an inflammatory or noninflammatory environment (Fig. 7a-h). Because PKM2 tetramers are more enzymatically active than PKM2 monomers and dimers, the mechanism of higher PK activity could be a shift from PKM2 dimers or monomers to PKM2 tetramers.48,49,50 Here, a DSS crosslinking study was performed to assess the status of the allosteric regulation of PKM2. Consistent with the enhanced PK activity, PKM2 tetramerization was elevated by GACAT2 overexpression (Fig. 7i-l). Furthermore, p-PKM2, an indicator of monomer/dimer formation,50 was increased or decreased in response to GACAT2 overexpression or knockdown, respectively (Fig. 7m-p). Additionally, subcellular fractionation analysis and immunofluorescence staining for mitochondria and PKM2 in PDLSCs showed that GACAT2 overexpression might result in the translocation of PKM2 into the mitochondria (Fig. 7q-s), and the translocation of PKM2 into mitochondria is a key step in PKM2 function.51,52 For example, mitochondrial PKM2 increases mitochondrial permeability and thereby generates more ATP for cell survival under glucose starvation.51 Although many studies have highlighted the essential role of mitochondrial PKM2 (such as ROS adaptation and ATP production), recent evidence shows that PKM2 may also translocate to the nucleus and then regulate glycolytic metabolism.32 The translocation of PKM2 to other organelles or nuclei to influence cellular events remains to be further explored.

Taken together, our functional studies demonstrated that GACAT2 overexpression increased the cellular protein expression of PKM1/2, the PKM2 tetramer and p-PKM2 and led to enhanced PK activity along with increased translocation of PKM2 into the mitochondria (Fig. 7), which indicated that the interaction between GACAT2 and PKM1/2 is key for regulating mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment. PKM2 was previously reported to be a key metabolic regulator that affects cell differentiation by regulating mitochondrial fusion and fission,50,69 and some evidence has demonstrated that the activation of PKM2 may improve mitochondrial function by increasing mitochondrial metabolism.48,70 All of these findings indicate the crucial role of PKM2 in regulating mitochondrial function. In this study, we ultimately found that GACAT2 overexpression could reverse the inflammation-compromised mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs, but this effect could be abolished by PKM1/2 knockdown (Fig. 8a-h). The data also demonstrate that GACAT2 functions by binding to PKM1/2 to affect mitochondrial function and thereby regulate the cementoblastic differentiation of cells.

Despite recent advances in stem cell biology, the application of stem cell therapy in the management of many chronic inflammatory disorders, including periodontitis, remains in its infancy, largely due to the dysregulation of the reparative cell population exposed to inflammatory cues.14,15,16,71 Our data demonstrate for the first time a pivotal role of the lncRNA GACAT2 in regulating the mitochondrial function and cementogenesis of PDLSCs in an inflammatory environment (Fig. 8i). We found that the overexpression of GACAT2, by binding to PKM1/2, could reverse the inflammation-compromised mitochondrial function and cementoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs. Our findings provide new insights into the cellular and molecular events that occur in inflammation-mediated cell differentiation and identify a new therapeutic target for promoting multiple tissue regeneration within a diseased periodontium, including the cementum.

Materials and methods

Detailed materials and methods are provided in the Supplementary Information.