Abstract
Skeletal tissue is highly innervated. Although different types of nerves have been recently identified in the bone, the crosstalk between bone and nerves remains unclear. In this review, we outline the role of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) in bone regeneration following injury. We first introduce the conserved role of nerves in tissue regeneration in species ranging from amphibians to mammals. We then present the distribution of the PNS in the skeletal system under physiological conditions, fractures, or regeneration. Furthermore, we summarize the ways in which the PNS communicates with bone-lineage cells, the vasculature, and immune cells in the bone microenvironment. Based on this comprehensive and timely review, we conclude that the PNS regulates bone regeneration through neuropeptides or neurotransmitters and cells in the peripheral nerves. An in-depth understanding of the roles of peripheral nerves in bone regeneration will inform the development of new strategies based on bone-nerve crosstalk in promoting bone repair and regeneration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Different species have developed unique biological functions that allow them to survive in specific environments through evolution. The ability of most organisms to regenerate or repair tissue after injury or loss has also been significantly impacted by natural selection. In contrast to anthropocentric thinking, animals that possess the capacity for regeneration did not seem to obtain enough evolutionary advantages to make this trait highly conserved. The ability to regenerate is widely but not uniformly distributed among different species.1 Some organisms, such as teleost fishes, can regenerate all severed appendages and even vital organs, such as the heart, while many other species, including humans, cannot.2,3,4
In addition to stem cells, which are well-known players, many animal studies of tissue regeneration have suggested the important roles of peripheral nerves in the regeneration of various tissues. Peripheral nerves can be functionally divided into three categories: the autonomic nervous system (ANS), the somatic nervous system, and the enteric nervous system.5 Peripheral nerves classically function as links between central and peripheral organs through ligands secreted by terminal axons, establishing a pathway for central-peripheral communication and allowing the central nervous system (CNS) to perceive the external environment. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the ANS and somatic nervous system may be linked to the regeneration process, while the enteric nervous system has been recently shown to play an important role in the regulation of intestinal homeostasis and mucosal regeneration.6,7 Nerve fibers in each fascicle are protected by a connective tissue called endoneurium, which contains many cells, such as fibroblasts, macrophages, and vasculature-associated cells.8 There is increasing interest in the contributions of resident cells in nerves, Schwann cells (SCs), and endoneurial mesenchymal cells, as well as the nonclassical functions of peripheral nerves, such as the regulation of homeostasis,9,10,11,12 effects on development,13,14 and roles in tissue regeneration.15,16,17,18
The role of peripheral nerves in regeneration was first discovered in salamander limb regeneration,19 which is one of the most common models in regenerative medicine.20 Salamander limb regeneration is often considered to reproduce part of the developmental process. The process of regeneration is initiated by wound closure through the wound epithelium (WE). Under the newly formed WE, stump cells dedifferentiate and proliferate to form a blastema, which is a collection of various types of stem cells or progenitor cells. Later, under precise control, the distal blastema forms the apical ectodermal cap and gradually differentiates into a new limb.20,21 As the close connection between limb regeneration and the peripheral nervous system (PNS) in the salamander was gradually explored,21,22 revealing that reinnervation is indispensable for the restoration of lost or damaged tissues, more attention has been given to the role of the PNS in regeneration, particularly in humans.
Although many mammals, including humans, lack the ability to reconstruct a severed limb, their bone tissue can recover from trauma without scar formation. Bone fracture healing proceeds through four phases: hematoma, soft callus, hard callus, and hard callus remodeling.23 Bone healing starts with inflammation resulting from high-energy trauma, and immediate activation of the coagulation cascade leads to hematoma formation at the injured site. With the gradual resolution of inflammation, intramembranous ossification occurs at the periosteum where there is a good blood supply close to the fracture site, whereas areas under hypoxic conditions undergo endochondral ossification. The differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from marrow, muscle, and especially the periosteum into bone-lineage cells drives the formation of callus. Finally, the dynamic balance of osteoblast and osteoclast activity remodels newly formed woven bone into lamellar bone. Bones are richly innervated by peripheral nerves, and parallel findings on the role of the PNS in limb regeneration in distant spices and bone regeneration point to the common role of nerves in regeneration.24,25 Despite the fact that the role of the PNS in many other processes associated with bone metabolism has not been fully characterized, the inevitable question now applies to bone regeneration: how does communication occur between the PNS and other tissues in the bone regenerative microenvironment?
In this review, we focus on the conserved role of nerves in regeneration during evolution and summarize the innervation of bone under normal physiological conditions and during bone regeneration following trauma. We emphasize the presence of neuro-skeletal, neurovascular and neuroimmune interactions at different stages of bone regeneration and discuss the possible nerve-associated cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in osteogenesis and other processes that are essential for bone formation. We address the limitations and challenges in current studies with the hope of inspiring further research.
Function of peripheral nerves in tissue regeneration
Because the regeneration of amputated limbs in salamanders, from the blastema to the entire appendage, reflects the ideal outcome of regenerative medicine, efforts have been made to investigate whether the nerve-dependent mechanism is widespread in nature and to identify the animal model that is most similar to humans. In a salamander study, regeneration of the upper limb was inhibited by denervation at the brachial plexus level.26 Diverting nerves toward the damaged site could promote limb regeneration27 and even the growth of supernumerary limbs.28 It is noteworthy that the extent of denervation positively correlated with the impairment of limb regeneration,21 suggesting that peripheral nerves may be involved in the precise regulation of limb regeneration.
Regarding the mechanisms by which peripheral nerves regulate salamander limb regeneration, diffusible nerve factors were shown to cross the filter and promote blastema cell proliferation.29 In response to initial nerve injury signals, SCs undergo phenotypic changes, downregulating myelin proteins, such as Krox20, Sox10, and neuregulin 1. Similar to their progenitors, negative regulators of myelination and growth-promoting proteins, such as Notch and c-Jun, are upregulated in SCs. These changes facilitate the transition of SCs from typical peripheral glial cells to repair cells. Together with blastema-infiltrating nerve fibers, repair SCs release a variety of molecules in the microenvironment of the blastema. Although poorly understood, many diffusible nerve factors have been shown to regulate regenerative processes in the salamander, including substance P (SP),30,31 platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF),32 fibroblast growth factors, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP),33,34 glial growth factor,35 newt anterior gradient (nAG),36 transferrin,37 and neuregulin.38,39 These paracrine factors are produced by neurons or repair SCs and provide signals to immune cells or stem/precursor cells to support regeneration.40
The participation of peripheral nerves in regeneration is not, however, limited to salamanders or amphibians but is found in many other species, from lower organisms such as sea anemones,41 hydras (Cnidaria),42 planarians (Platyhelminthes),43 and starfish (Echinodermata),44 to vertebral organisms such as zebrafish,45 which possess the capacity for regeneration under neural effects (Fig. 1). Notably, the existence of species such as Placozoa and Porifera, which have the ability to regenerate without the nervous system, is coincident with the observation of the aneurogenic limb, which regenerates without a nerve supply but develops nerve-dependent regeneration after nerve transplantation and innervation.22 New findings in mammals are consistent with previous studies. For example, MRL/MpJ mice can regenerate injured ear tissue through blastema-like structures, while denervation inhibits the formation of the blastema.46 Furthermore, in murine digit tip regeneration, SCs in injured nerves have been shown to dedifferentiate and promote blastema proliferation in a paracrine manner.47 The process from blastema formation to appendage regrowth also requires complex regulation, such as cell pattern and polarity,48 which depends on the location (distal or proximal, dorsal or ventral) of cells within the newly formed tissue. Patterning defects have also been noted in denervated and regenerating murine digits.17 Taken together, these results indicate the widespread participation of peripheral nerves in mammalian tissue regeneration.
Advances in the understanding of tissue regeneration in other species have shed light on regeneration mechanisms in mammals. nAG, which is mainly produced by repair SCs during salamander limb regeneration, binds to its receptor Prod1 to stimulate blastema cells to enter the S phase of the cell cycle and promote blastema expansion.36 The administration of nAG rescues 50% of the effect of denervation on salamander limb regeneration.36 Unfortunately, although it is heralded as the key to the field of regenerative medicine, nAG has no orthologous protein in humans.49 The closest proteins in humans are anterior gradient protein 2 (AGR2) and AGR3, but their potential role in regeneration remains unclear, as these factors lack the features of secreted proteins.49 Nevertheless, cells in the blastema were once considered to be multipotent and homogeneous based on studies of salamander regeneration.50 Genetic lineage tracing and single-cell transcriptomic profiling of mammalian digit regeneration, however, have shown that the heterogeneous blastema consists of many cell types.51,52 Later studies indicated that the origin cells of the blastema were developmental lineage-restricted, which is prevented across germline lineages51,53 but is relatively flexible in the consequent generated mesenchymal lineage,54 suggesting that the newly formed tissue differentiated from blastema cells depending on their respective origin and regenerative microenvironment. Distinct from the paracrine pathway, most endoneurial mesenchymal cells in peripheral nerves have multipotential differentiation abilities, as shown by upregulated expression of genes such as Aldh1a2, Col11a1, Cthrc1, Inhbb, Kng2, and Wif1 and downregulated expression of genes related to connective tissue after nerve injury. These neural crest-derived cells (NCCs) not only contribute to blastema formation but also subsequently differentiate into dermis or bone in response to specific environmental cues.55
Overall, studies on both mammals and phylogenetically distant animals, such as amphibians, show how peripheral nerves can regulate regeneration: (1) the secretion of neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, and other neural molecules21,56 and (2) the differentiation of stem/precursor-like cells and/or transdifferentiation from endoneurial mesenchymal cells in injured peripheral nerves.5
Distribution of peripheral nerves in the skeletal system
The afferent nerves of the peripheral system are collectively known as sensory nerves. The efferent nerves consist of motor nerves and autonomic nerves, which can be further categorized into the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the parasympathetic nervous system (PSNS) (Fig. S1). Sensory nerves extend from their cell bodies in the dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) of the spinal cord, and cranial bone is innervated by sensory nerves emanating from cranial nerve ganglia, such as the trigeminal ganglion. Depending on their diameter and myelination, sensory nerves can also be classified into thin, nonmyelinated C fibers and myelinated A fibers.57,58 It has been shown that pain after bone fracture is mainly detected by Aδ fibers and C fibers59 because Aδ fibers and C fibers account for almost all sensory nerves that innervate bone.60,61,62 C fibers can be further divided into peptidergic and nonpeptidergic fibers, which can transduce noxious chemical and thermal stimulation.57 Postganglionic fibers of the ANS are similar to C fibers, as they are thin and nonmyelinated.63
Peripheral innervation in the skeletal system has gradually been outlined using immunoreactivity to biomarkers of anabolic processes of postganglionic representative neurotransmitters (Fig. 2a, b). The distribution of the SNS in bones can be visualized through norepinephrine (NE), which is synthesized from the amino acid tyrosine by two important enzymes: tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine β-hydroxylase.64,65 Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is mainly released by sympathetic terminals and accompanied in the periphery by NE,66 which is associated with NPY on SNS visualization. The location of acetylcholine (ACh) in the vesicular ACh transporter (VAChT) and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) allows mapping of PSNS distribution.67,68 Major sensory neurotransmitters, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and SP, can be used to identify peptidergic sensory nerves because of their relatively exclusive origins.69,70,71,72 Other primary molecules of sensory nerves, such as tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA), neurofilament 200, and isolectin B4, are biomarkers of different sensory lineages (Fig. 2c).73,74,75 It has been reported that the proportions of CGRP+ peptidergic sensory axons and TH+ sympathetic adrenergic axons in the total nerve population innervating the skeleton were at least 20%–30% and 25%–50%, respectively.76 Reliable characterization of non‐peptidergic sensory axons that innervate bone is needed.
The presence of the SNS and sensory nerves in the skeletal system has been visualized by immunolabeling techniques.61,71,72,77,78 However, since a group of postganglionic sympathetic neurons exhibits a cholinergic phenotype in bone,79,80 the accuracy of innervation of the PSNS in the bone as delineated by positive VAChT and ChAT immunoreactivity is compromised. Ingeniously, injection of a recombinant pseudorabies virus into the distal femoral metaphysis labels the intermediolateral column at the thoracic level with SNS innervation, as well as the intermediolateral column at the sacral spinal cord segment where PSNS preganglionic neurons are located, which establishes a strong connection between PSNS and bone innervation.81 Direct evidence tracing the autonomic postganglionic nerves in the bone to parasympathetic ganglia is expected to provide further support for their relationship.
The involvement of the PNS with the skeleton has been reported as early as embryonic development. Mesenchymal condensation directly differentiates into bone via intramembranous ossification during embryonic development to form flat bones, whereas during endochondral ossification, cartilaginous tissues form and are then replaced by mineralized bone.82 During the embryonic development of long bones in mice, endochondral ossification begins on approximately embryonic day 15 (E15), and secondary ossification occurs on approximately postnatal day 5 (P5).13,83 TrkA+ sensory nerves innervate the developing femur at the perichondrial region adjacent to sites of primary ossification on E14.5 and are present at the epiphyseal surface of the femur on P0.13 Nerve growth factor (NGF), which supports neuronal survival and guides axonal growth, is expressed in perichondrial cells as early as E14.5.13 The requirement of TrkA signaling in sensory nerves for the formation of primary and secondary ossification is further suggested by the reductions in innervation, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis resulting from the disruption of NGF-TrkA signaling.13 After birth, the density of nerves continues to increase in growing bones, but NPY + nerve fibers could not be detected until P4.84 In addition to long bone development, innervation also participates in osteogenesis through intramembranous ossification. The mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve develops preferentially in the primordium of the lower jaw,85 and the ossification center of the mandible is just adjacent to the nerve bundle, extending along the inferior alveolar nerve.86 Genetic disruption of TrkA signaling in sensory nerves leads to early closure of cranial sutures.87
Generally, peripheral nerves are thought to accompany blood vessels,88 and this holds true in mature bones. Sensory nerves, as well as the SNS, parallel the vascular structures to reach bone as a mixture of motor, sensory and sympathetic nerves.89 The major nerves consist of mixed neural components innervating the periosteum in a meshwork pattern,71 particularly the inner cambium layer, which possesses a high cell density consisting mainly of periosteum-derived MSCs, osteoclasts and osteoblasts.90,91 Through nutrient canals, vertical Haversian canals, and transverse Volkmann’s canals, sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers penetrate into the cortical bone parallel to the vasculature and then into the bone marrow.92,93,94 Rodent studies have demonstrated that the periosteum has the highest density of innervation, followed by the bone marrow and mineralized cortical bone.76,77,92 Although there is a possibility that rodents and humans share a similar innervation pattern,95,96 consistent innervation density of the bone in humans has not been shown until recently.97 The significant predominance of CGRP+ nerves relative to TH+ nerves in the periosteum is reversed in bone marrow,76 indicating the different roles/mechanisms of sensory nerves and the SNS in regulating bone hemostasis and regeneration. When running parallel with the vasculature, the sensory nerves and SNS tend to run linearly or spirally around vessels, respectively.92,98 The distribution of peripheral nerves in bone constitutes the foundation of PNS-mediated regulation of the skeletal system. PSNS have been shown to exist in bone,81 but detailed and quantitative experiments are still lacking. Furthermore, the same subcompartment may exhibit heterogeneity in innervation when there is active metabolism, which is associated with more innervation, such as in epiphyseal trabecular bone.77 The physiological innervation of the PNS in different compartments of bone begins during embryonic development, facilitates the regulatory potential of peripheral nerves, and participates in various physiological or pathological processes in bone.
Distribution of peripheral nerves in the skeletal system following the fracture
Following injury, molecular and cellular changes are observed in the neuronal body, cells resident in peripheral nerves, and at the site of injury. These changes in peripheral nerves after bone fracture are prerequisites for the initiation of bone regeneration.
Changes in peripheral nerves after fracture
Bone fractures are common injuries caused by external forces or pathological changes that weaken the bone structure, and the PNS responds actively to the damage signal.99 The PNS interrupts synapses and switches to a regenerative state,100,101,102 reducing the production of neuropeptides for regeneration-associated metabolism, as shown by the downregulation of synthesis in the perikarya.103,104,105,106 However, neuropeptides, such as CGRP and SP, are thought to be increased in the fracture region.107,108 Apart from the fact that activation of the PNS directly contributes to the release of neurotransmitters,109 synthesis in injured axons (axonal synthesis) rather than the perikarya during regeneration partly accounts for the increase in neurotransmitters.110 When peripheral nerves are injured at a bone fracture site, injury signals travel in a retrograde manner along the proximal axon to the cell bodies to initiate regeneration.111 The distal axon undergoes Wallerian degeneration, in which the axon degenerates, myelin breaks down, the blood–nerve barrier is permeabilized, and the resultant myelin debris containing axonal growth inhibitory signals is cleared first by SCs and later by recruited macrophages.111,112 The roles of macrophages in peripheral nerve regeneration have been exhaustively reviewed recently.113 Other immune cells, such as mast cells, neutrophils, and T cells, are also recruited to the injured site as well as the distal stump and are involved in pain induction, but their role in nerve regeneration is still obscure.114 Regenerating proximal axons extend to the target organ following the guidance of SC basal lamina tubes, which are provisional channels formed by the proliferation of repair SCs.111 Delayed reinnervation of the target organ results in regeneration failure because of the degeneration of SC tubes.111
The mechanical deformation associated with bone fractures or defects activates the Aδ or C fibers, which transmit initial pain stimuli to the relevant cortical areas,115 and then central signals descend to the fracture site, resulting in local regulation such as the release of catecholamine by sympathetic arousal. Inflammation at the fracture site sensitizes the sensory nerves, which lowers the response threshold to noxious mechanical, chemical and thermal stimuli.109,116,117,118 There is a wide range of receptors at the terminals of sensory nerves that detect specific inflammatory mediators and growth factors,119 and the activation of these receptors triggers a series of downstream changes, such as the phosphorylation, gating, and upregulation of ion channels (e.g., Nav1.7, Nav1.8, Nav1.9, TRPV1, and TRPA1),109 leading to sensitization as well as further neurotransmitter release.109,120 Cytokines (histamine, TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17A), lipid mediators (prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), leukotriene B4), and growth factors (NGF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)) are produced mainly by mast cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and Th17 or γδT cells and contribute substantially to the sensitization of sensory nerves.121 For example, the binding of TNFα and its receptor (TNFα receptor 1, TNFR1) on the terminals phosphorylates Nav1.8 channels to facilitate channel opening.122 In short, Wallerian degeneration and inflammation are the primary responses of peripheral nerves during bone fracture.
Changes in peripheral nerves during bone repair and regeneration
Bone regeneration completely restores the original microarchitecture and is accompanied by reinnervation. These two seemingly independent processes are tightly intertwined in reality. Using growth-associated protein 43,123 which is more prevalent in differentiating and regenerating neurons than in mature neurons,124 or Thy-1,110 a pan-neural gene,125 the changes in peripheral nerves during reinnervation at the fracture site can be clearly observed. The reinnervation process precedes angiogenesis at the early stage of bone repair/regeneration.126,127 Previous studies have reported that ectopic sprouting of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers after bone trauma greatly contributes to the hyperinnervation of all the compartments at the fracture site.123,127,128,129 Moreover, researchers concluded that an adequate density of innervation was the prerequisite for initiating regeneration in salamanders,22,130 indicating that hyperinnervation after bone fracture may be required for regeneration. During callus formation and maturation, peripheral nerves sprout while the bone matrix is deposited, gradually reduced, and finally restricted to the outer fibrous capsule of the hard callus when injured nerves are trimmed.123 Both CGRP+ and TH+ spouting nerve fibers can participate in reinnervation, and CGRP+ nerve fibers contribute the most.123,129,131 Reinnervation of bone has also been confirmed by findings in calvarial bone defect regeneration.132 After bone repair, the PNS fibers in bone typically return to physiological levels. However, in fracture nonunion, hyperinnervation remains around the bone, periosteum, cortical bone, and bone marrow.128 At present, the remaining hyperinnervation is viewed as a pathological state associated with chronic pain.133 These observations suggest an interdependent relationship between bone regeneration and PNS regeneration after bone fracture.
Peripheral nerve regulation of bone regeneration
Physiological innervation of different compartments and the intertwined schedule of regeneration make the PNS a strong candidate for the regulation of bone regeneration. With continuous research on the role of the PNS in bone regeneration, the emerging importance of the PNS echoes the well-known role of nerves in limb regeneration. Early relevant denervation experiments provided insight into this phenomenon. Sciatic nerve resection results in defective callus formation in rats and rabbits.25 Inferior alveolar denervation impairs regeneration of the mandibular bone defect in rats.26 The administration of high-dose capsaicin to destroy capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves decreases Mg2+-mediated promotion of fracture healing.108 Similarly, disruption of TrkA signaling blunts angiogenesis and delays callus formation in mice.124 Knockout of GGRP in mice inhibits bone healing.134 Sympathectomized mice have delayed cartilaginous callus formation and callus mineralization.135,136 The findings of these in vitro and animal experiments are compatible with clinical observations of bone development. Congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis, which is a hereditary neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in TRKA,134 is associated with short stature and delayed fracture healing.137 In regard to unsuccessful bone regeneration, initial injury of the nerve or vasculature may be associated with a secondary operation after nonunion repair.136 The nonhealing area in spondylolisthesis patients has been shown to coincide with the region lacking innervation.138 In addition, postoperative absorption has been a challenge in the use of vascularized iliac bone to reconstruct the jaw,139 and 10 out of 22 patients who were treated with neurorrhaphy between the ilioinguinal nerve and the inferior alveolar nerve or auricular nerve during the reconstruction of the mandibular bone exhibited reduced bone absorption.140 These clinical observations indicate the involvement of peripheral nerves in regulating osteogenesis from the embryonic phase to adulthood.
The discovery of relevant neuropeptides and their receptors in bone-lineage cells is a cornerstone of their crosstalk with the PNS (Table 1), but how are the regulatory signals transported from neurons to the bone? Although osteocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and vascular endothelial cells are located in close proximity to free nerve endings,98,141,142 the rarity of these direct connections casts doubt on the hypothesis of synaptic connections, which has not yet been found.141,143,144 It is uncertain whether the effects of PNS fibers on bone regeneration occur in a direct or indirect manner or both. Currently, two main ways whereby the PNS regulates bone regeneration have been proposed, as shown in Fig. 3.
Neuro-skeletal regulation during bone regeneration
After bone trauma, nerve activation in bone and nerve regeneration at the injured site occur simultaneously. The upregulation of a wide variety of neuropeptides or neurotransmitters in activated sensory nerves and in the ANS is regulated by signals to the CNS and contributes to shaping the dynamic microenvironment of bone regeneration (Fig. 4). In addition, neurotrophins and axon guidance family proteins, which are highly active during nerve regeneration and are regulated by the PNS and other cells in the bone microenvironment, are also responsible for mediating bone regeneration. Cells in nerves, such as SCs and endoneurial mesenchymal cells, convert to a regenerative phenotype that is more similar to their precursor state. Through paracrine signaling or possible redifferentiation, these transcription-altered cells not only participate in nerve regeneration but also communicate with bone-lineage cells for bone regeneration.
CGRP
CGRP, which is the major neurotransmitter of sensory nerves, is produced by alternative splicing of the CALC gene.145,146 CGRP is transcribed from different regions in the CALC gene and exists in two forms: αCGRP and βCGRP. βCGRP is mainly found in the enteric nervous system,70,147 which is consistent with the observation that αCGRP is the main cause of elevated levels of CGRP in serum after the fracture in mice.148 The CGRP receptor is a heterodimer of calcitonin receptor‐like receptor (CRLR), which is a G‐protein coupled receptor (GPCR), and its coreceptor, receptor activity‐modifying protein 1 (RAMP1).70 CGRP is increased in injured bone tissues, and the expression of its receptor also increases at the early stages of bone regeneration.107,148 The administration of CGRP promoted the migration of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to the fracture site and osteogenic differentiation in rats.149 Disruption of CGRP signaling with receptor antagonists such as CGRP 8–37 and nonpeptide CGRP antagonists (BIBN4096BS) or with short interfering RNA significantly inhibited new bone formation.107,149 Further studies demonstrated that CGRP activated the cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathway and subsequently inhibited BMSC apoptosis and promoted BMSC proliferation and osteogenic differentiation by enhancing Wnt/β‐catenin in vitro.150,151 The overexpression of RAMP1 in BMSCs enhances the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs, while blocking Yap1 blocks this effect, indicating that CGRP can promote BMSC differentiation via the Hippo/Yap pathway.152 Impairment of cartilaginous callus remodeling and callus bridging in CGRP−/− mice is linked to the low expression of key mediators (adiponectin, adipocyte protein 2, and adipsin) of the PPARγ pathway,134 the inhibition of which impairs the osteogenesis effect of BMP-2.153 CGRP also has a negative effect on osteoclastogenesis by suppressing osteoprotegerin (OPG) production in osteoblasts.154 Preclinical use of electrical stimulation of lumbar DRGs can promote the release of CGRP and effectively enhance femoral fracture healing, providing an innovative strategy for further clinical use.155
Substance P
SP is another major neurotransmitter that is released by activated sensory nerves and is usually released with CGRP.153 SP is encoded by the tachykinin precursor 1 (TAC1) gene and binds to its receptor neurokinin‐1 receptor (NK‐1R) to regulate target cells. NK-1R has been identified in BMSCs,135 osteoblasts and osteoclasts.156,157,158 SP+ nerve fibers are increased following a fracture or bone defect,108,159 as is the expression of SP in injured bone.160 SP has been reported to improve the osteoblastic differentiation of BMSCs and MC3T3-E1 cells by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.161,162 Furthermore, SP embedded on titanium substrates can also promote BMSC recruitment during bone healing.163 On the other hand, blocking NK-1R reduces the expression of osteocalcin and collagen 1A2 and 2A1 during bone regeneration, resulting in significantly impaired biomechanical strength.164
While having an impact on osteogenesis differentiation, SP also modulates osteoclastogenesis. SP can promote osteoclastogenesis independently of RANKL by inducing NF‐κB in osteoclast precursors165 or by stimulating osteoblast lineage cells to produce RANKL.158 This effect has been reported to be dose dependent: SP promotes osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization when the concentration is greater than 10−8 mol·L−1 and suppresses these processes at less than 10−8 mol·L−1.135 Investigation of the regenerative process of TCA1−/− mice provided new evidence. Compared to bone regeneration in WT mice, TAC1−/− mice showed a decrease in the total area of cartilaginous soft callus tissue, reduced numbers of osteoclasts and osteoblasts at the fracture site, and impaired resistance to torsional failure load.135 Furthermore, recent observations in ovariectomized TAC1−/− mice contradict previously published results with regard to the hypertrophic chondrocyte area, but the number of osteoclasts in the fracture site was consistent with the final outcome.166 Whether these discrepancies are the result of ovariectomy is not yet clear.
Norepinephrine
NE is an important neurotransmitter that is released by noradrenergic nerves, which are mainly postganglionic fibers of the SNS. There are two forms of the receptor, the α‐adrenergic (α‐AR) and β‐adrenergic receptors (β‐AR), each containing many subtypes.89 These receptors have been observed in various bone-lineage cells.144,167,168,169,170 High sympathetic tone increases epinephrine, which can be detected in urine, resulting in the suppression of osteoblast activity, as evidenced by abnormal morphology and reduced Ki67 expression in osterix+ cells.171 A β2-AR antagonist has been shown to rescue these changes, highlighting the negative effect of NE on osteoblastic differentiation.171 NE may also inhibit the proliferation of hBMSCs through β2-AR-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and PKA.172 In addition, NE induces osteoclastogenesis by activating RANKL/OPG.173,174 The nonselective β‐AR blocker propranolol has been shown to enhance bone healing in rats;175 interestingly, administration of propranolol to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) mice with femur fractures ameliorated the defect in new bone formation.176 However, given that the effect of nonselective β-AR blockade differs greatly between mice and humans in the context of bone metabolism,177 further evidence on the effects of NE and β‐AR on human bone regeneration is still needed. For α‐AR, DNA synthesis in BMSCs is reported to increase in rats via α1-AR.178 The administration of phenylephrine, a nonspecific α1-AR agonist, promotes the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells by increasing the expression of the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein δ (Cebpd).169 Its detailed role in bone regeneration requires further elucidation.
Significantly, α- and β-ARs are GPCRs, and downstream binding to α-AR decreases cAMP and subsequently inhibits PKA, while binding to β-AR induces the opposite effects. However, the binding affinity of NE largely depends on its concentration:179 at concentrations less than 10−8 mol·L−1, NE preferentially binds to α‐AR, while at concentrations higher than 10−6 mol·L−1, β‐AR is preferred. The concentration of NE in bone marrow ranges from 10−9 mol·L−1 (physiological) to 10−5 mol·L−1 (pathological).179,180 Therefore, the effect of NE during the process of bone regeneration may vary dynamically depending on the stage of the regenerative process.
Acetylcholine
Identifying the involvement of PSNS in the skeletal system draws attention to the role of ACh in bone regeneration. As previously described (Fig. 2b), ACh can function as a transmitter in the PSNS by binding to nicotinic (nAChRs) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs),68 both of which have been found in bone-lineage cells.181,182,183 Past studies demonstrated that ACh promoted osteoblastic proliferation81,182 but had little effect on osteoblastic differentiation.81 Unexpected negative effects on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in osteoblasts have also been reported.181 An increase in bone resorption was observed in α2nAChR−/−mice through increased osteoclast numbers, and nAChR agonist administration increased apoptosis.81 Furthermore, RANKL-induced Ca2+ oscillation, the well-established osteoclastogenesis process,184 is inhibited by activation of nAChR, and subsequent weakened Ca2+-NFATc1 signaling leads to a negative regulatory effect on osteoclastogenesis.185 Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) that suppresses ACh degradation and increases the concentration of ACh, impairs bone healing by decreasing immune cell infiltration during the inflammation phase and reducing new bone formation.186 In a retrospective cohort study on Alzheimer’s disease patients with hip fracture, AChEI users had better radiographically observed union at the fracture site; better bone quality; and fewer healing complications, such as infection and delayed healing, than nonusers.187 Notably, the specific functions of the mAChR subtypes in the skeletal system should be clarified.81,182,188 Moreover, the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M3AChR) in nerves plays an important role in bone metabolism.188
Neuropeptide Y and vasoactive intestinal peptide
The receptors for NPY are GPCRs, and according to a rodent study, two of the five types (Y1 and Y2) are associated with the regulation of the skeletal system.189 Y1 has been observed in osteoblasts, while Y2 is located in the brain.190 Previous studies have demonstrated that NPY decreases cAMP levels in osteoblasts, impairing mineralization,190 while the administration of a Y1 antagonist promotes BMSC osteoblastic differentiation.191 Similarly, BMSCs isolated from Y1-silenced mice exhibited increased ALP activity and calcium nodule formation with increased expression of COL1, OCN, and Runx2, further illustrating the effect of NPY on the proliferation and apoptosis of BMSCs.192 The use of the Y1 receptor antagonist PD160170 on the femur improved the healing of bone defects.193 Recently, osteocytes from aging mice were shown to secrete NPY at high levels to induce adipogenesis in BMSCs, which is consistent with previous investigations.194
Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), which is produced by enteric neurons, is also released by other peripheral nerves195,196 and is mediated by three types of GPCRs (VPAC1, VPAC2, PAC1).196 VIP can promote BMSC osteogenic differentiation through the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in rats.197 Although reported to inhibit BMSC proliferation,198 VIP-containing MeHA hydrogels increase the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), ultimately improving the healing of rat skull defects.197 Similarly, impaired bone regeneration after chemical sympathectomy can be rescued with VIP treatment, resulting in an increase in mineralized callus and improved callus bridging.199
Neurotrophins
Neurotrophins are crucial for neuronal development and normal function and are involved in the formation of almost all neural circuits.200 Four types of neurotrophins have been discovered in mammals: NGF, BDNF, neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and neurotrophin-4/5 (NT-4/5). All types can bind to the low-affinity receptor p75NTR and to the specific high-affinity tropomyosin-related kinase (TRK).200,201 These factors function mainly through TRK; NGF binds to TrkA, BDNF and NT-4/5 bind to TrkB, and NT-3 binds to TrkC.201 Neurotrophins have been shown to be involved in bone regeneration through relevant receptors in recent years, especially NGF, BDNF, and NT-3.202,203,204,205,206
NGF is upregulated at the very early postfracture stage.123 In vitro, NGF can promote osteoblastic differentiation207 and has an antiapoptotic effect on MC3T3-E1 cells.208 A recent study demonstrated that most cells located in the periosteal callus, mainly periosteal/stromal cells and macrophages, were NGF+ cells during callus ossification, and the number of cells decreased during mineralization,123 which is consistent with the reinnervation of the injured PNS as previously described. Chemical disruption of NGF-TrkA signaling impairs the regeneration of the PNS and bone by reducing osteoblast activity and delaying callus mineralization.123 The administration of exogenous NGF improved healing in rabbit mandible fractures by increasing BMP-9 and VEGF levels.209 Similarly, entochondrostosis is enhanced by β-NGF supplementation, as evidenced by the increased expression of marker genes, such as Ihh, Alpl, and Sdf-1, which are associated with endochondral ossification. Local injection of NGF consequently promotes bone regeneration with deceased cartilage and increased bone volume.210 However, there are also controversial results suggesting that blockade NGF or TrkA by neutralizing antibodies reduces fracture-induced pain but has no side effect on bone healing as changes on biomechanical properties and callus formation and maturation are not observed in mice.211,212 A recent study showed that NGF has been used to treat traumatic nonunion in clinical trials, showing encouraging outcomes in promoting callus formation and fracture healing.213 A high-quality clinical trial with a large sample size is still needed to verify the effect of anti-NGF agents on bone pain and regeneration.
BDNF, which is critical in the development of the nervous system,201 was found in the brain after the discovery of NGF. BDNF also has an effect on the regulation of bone regeneration and can be released by inflammation-activated TrkA+ nerve fibers after bone trauma.214 BDNF can promote the proliferation and differentiation of hBMSCs.215 The promotion of bone regeneration by BDNF is achieved through the upregulation of integrin β1 via TrkB‐mediated ERK1/2 and AKT signaling.216 BDNF also enhances the production of RANKL by hBMSCs, contributing to osteoclastogenesis.217 These seemingly conflicting effects on bone may be due to the epigenetic regulation of BDNF transcription, whereby different physiological or pathological conditions induce alternative splicing and polyadenylation.201
The role of NT-3 in bone regeneration has been recently noted. The upregulated expression of NT-3 and its receptor TrkC has been verified during bone regeneration.206 By enhancing the expression of BMP-2 through Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation, NT-3 promotes osteogenesis in rat bone marrow stromal cells in vitro.206 Treatment with NT-3 during tibial fracture regeneration in rats promoted the expression of BMP-2 and TGF-β1, resulting in increased maximum load capacities.218 Systemic administration of NT-3 reduced the bone volume at the defects through immunoneutralization.206 It has been demonstrated that NT-4/5 is involved in pulp cell differentiation and regulating the function of periodontal ligament cells,219,220 but the association of NT-4/5 with bone regeneration remains unclear.
Axon guidance family proteins
Axon guidance family proteins were initially identified during the development of the nervous system and provide attractive or repulsive cues to nerves during development or regeneration. Axon guidance family proteins guide the nerve to reach the correct target.221,222 Different from the previously described molecules, many members of this family and their ligands are membrane-bound. Class 3 semaphorins, a secreted class of axon guidance proteins, have long been linked to bone regulation. Semaphorin 3A (Sema3A), the receptor Nrp1, and the coreceptor Plxna1–3 have been found in bone tissue. Sema3A derived from sensory nerves has independent effect on bone by expediting innervation of sensory nerves and Sema3A promotes osteoblastic differentiation, enhances new bone formation, and inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis via the Rac1 and Wnt/β-catenin pathways.223,224 The administration of Sema3A improved the formation of new bone in a similar way during calvarial defect healing in rats.225 The promotion of tibial fracture healing by Sema3A has also been observed in osteoporotic rats.226 Other Semaphorin 3 proteins also have effects on bone. Sema3E may inhibit the migration of osteoblasts and suppress the osteoclastogenesis of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs).227 Furthermore, Sema4D has been demonstrated to exhibit negative effects on osteogenesis. By binding to the receptor Plexin-B1 on osteoblasts, osteoclast-derived Sema4D inhibits insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling, as well as migration, and consequently impairs bone formation.228 Disrupting Sema4D signaling increases the regeneration of defects in osteoporotic mice.229
The remaining classical axon guidance family proteins include ephrins, slits, and netrins. Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma (Eph) receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands, ephrins, are important in bone formation. When Eph receptors on nerves mediate signal transduction, ephrins can also elicit a reverse signal in ephrin-expressing cells,230 such as bone-lineage cells (Table 1).231,232,233,234 Knocking out ephrin-B1 or -B2 in osteogenic progenitors significantly inhibited fracture healing.235,236 SLIT3 can promote the proliferation and migration of osteoblasts while suppressing the maturation of osteoclasts.237 Netrin-1 is involved in osteoclast differentiation,238 and as a part of bone-lineage cells that coordinates the PNS, osteoclasts can produce netrin-1 to guide the PNS.239 Studies on the effects of slits and netrins on bone-lineage cells during bone regeneration are still lacking. Moreover, a large number of axon guidance family proteins are theoretically needed to assist nerve growth, but very few new members have been discovered, such as draxin and phosphatidyl-β-D-glucoside.222
PGE2 signaling
The initial inflammatory phase drives bone regeneration, during which inflammatory mediators are produced to initiate a cascade of bone repair. PGE2 is a lipid mediator that is a member of the prostaglandin family. The key enzymes associated with PGE2 biosynthesis are prostaglandin E2 synthase-1 (mPGES-1) and COX. Inflammation-induced COX-2 expression contributes most to the catalysis of arachidonic acid into PGE2.240 PGE2 functions by binding with the receptors EP1–4, which are GPCRs that activate downstream effectors.240 PGE2 activates the EP4 receptor on sensory nerves and signals to the hypothalamus, downregulating sympathetic tone by activating the transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein. Consequently, the adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs is inhibited, and osteoblastic differentiation is enhanced. Disruption of PGE2/EP4 signaling significantly impairs bone regeneration.171,241 Clinical administration of NSAIDs to reduce pain delays fracture healing and increases bone nonunion, providing further supporting evidence.242 Similarly, treatment with opiates, another effective class of analgesic drugs whose receptors are widely expressed on central and peripheral nerves,243 also leads to impaired bone healing.244,245 These clinical observations complicate pain management after the bone fracture, urging more intensive studies to support clinical strategies. Given the critical role of the inflammatory environment after bone trauma, this pathway holds great importance in the regenerative process. Although PGE2 is not released by neurons, neuro-skeletal regulation is initiated by PGE2. Moreover, direct effects of PGE2 on bone-lineage cells have also been reported.246,247,248 PGE2 signaling indicates that sensory and sympathetic nerves act as a circuit, and the collaboration of sensory and sympathetic nerves as parallel efferent regulators to maintain hematopoietic stem cells in BM niches has also been reported recently.249 The full picture of the relationship between sensory and sympathetic nerves in bone regeneration has yet to be revealed. Great progress has been made in identifying the roles of neuropeptides and neurotransmitters in bone regeneration, but the exact mechanisms whereby neuropeptides and neurotransmitters regulate specific bone regenerative processes are still under investigation (Fig. 5).
SCs and endoneurial mesenchymal cells
SC secretion has been given the greatest attention in peripheral nerve regeneration.8 Paracrine effects also contribute to the function of SCs during bone regeneration. Transplantation of SCs into the denervated mandibular defects of mice effectively mitigates impaired defect regeneration, resulting in significantly increased bone formation.25 PDGF-AA, oncostatin M, and parathyroid hormone have been shown to promote bone formation following the implantation of SCs in denervated mice.25 The paracrine effect is also substantiated by the observation that conditioned medium from SCs promoted the proliferation and migration of BMSCs and improved fracture healing.250 Exosomes derived from SCs showed a similar promoting effect on BMSCs and bone regeneration.251
Furthermore, a developmental link between the nervous and skeletal systems through SCs has been established.252 SC precursors (SCPs) detach from nerve fibers and differentiate into chondrocytes and mature osteocytes.253 SCs detach from injured nerves and dedifferentiate, exhibiting a phenotype that mimics that of stem cells. Using a clonal color-coding technique to trace peripheral glia showed that SCPs and SCs were dormant NCCs that could be recruited from injured nerves.253 In addition, SC-derived dental MSCs can ultimately differentiate into odontoblasts, contributing to tooth regeneration after damage.253 Whether adult SCs directly contribute to bone formation in other parts of the skeletal system is a question that needs further investigation.
As previously described, cells reside in peripheral nerves that actively participate in regeneration (Fig. 3a). Recent single-cell RNA sequencing identified the cells in nerve fibers: SCs, fibroblasts, immune cells, and vasculature-associated cells.254 SCs and endoneurial fibroblasts are believed to be the main cells involved in PNS regeneration.254 A recent experiment identified a group of PDGFRα+ mesenchymal cells, including NCCs, in the endoneurium that displayed characteristics of mesenchymal precursor cells and could dramatically proliferate and differentiate into osteoblasts in vitro and in vivo after nerve injury, promoting regeneration of the digit tip.55
Neuropeptide interactions are noteworthy, and communication between CGRP and SP has also been reported. Bisphosphonates (BPs), which are typically used to treat certain bone diseases, can impair bone regeneration in the jaw by inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption.255 BPs disturb the neuropeptide balance of CGRP and SP by decreasing CGRP levels and increasing SP levels in the callus. However, the administration of CGRP or SP alone had no effect on the BP-mediated decrease in a macrophage-like cell line (RAW 264.7 cells) in vitro, while concomitant application reduced toxicity.256 The ratio of CGRP to SP is tightly correlated with BP administration.256 SP or CGRP alone promotes BMP-2 signaling in MC3T3 preosteoblasts, but when combined, these factors inhibit osteogenic differentiation.257
It should be noted that many neuropeptides and neurotransmitters released by the PNS after bone trauma can also be produced by nonneuronal cells, such as osteoblast-derived CGRP,258 osteocyte-derived SP,108 osteocyte-derived NPY,194 and callus-derived NGF.259 In particular, macrophage-derived NGF stimulates the ingrowth of skeletal sensory nerves as a key mediator of cranial bone regeneration.132 These factors could function as supplements to neuro-skeletal regulation or via a feedback loop, but the exact effect remains to be clarified. Therefore, conclusions on the function of the PNS in skeletal regeneration should be made with caution. The increased production of neuropeptides during bone healing is shown in Fig. 6, showing differential distributions in the inflammatory, soft/cartilaginous callus, hard/bony callus, and remodeling phases. These bioactive molecules produced by bone-lineage cells during regeneration will not only act on the PNS but also the vasculature and immune system and coordinate bone regeneration processes.
Neurovascular interactions in bone regeneration
The vasculature develops prior to the nervous system during early embryonic development.260 However, studies in developing limb skin during later embryonic stages show that the alignment of nerve and blood vessels occurs via mesenchymal intrinsic cues or by blood vessels following the routes of peripheral nerves,261,262,263 which is consistent with observations in the fracture callus in bone repair. Neurovascular interactions have been indicated as early as the embryonic period, when nerves and vessels are guided by shared signals such as NGF, VEGF, and four classic axon guidance family proteins (semaphorins, ephrins, netrins, and slits) and corresponding receptors to their destinations.88 Similar pathfinding is mediated by common molecular cues and wiring patterns between blood vessels and sensory nerves. VEGF is released from sensory nerves or SCs and guides blood vessel formation locally during embryonic development and tissue repair. An association between neurovascular interactions and various pathologies, such as tumors21,264 and osteoarthritis (OA) (see below), has also been noted. Recently, precisely orchestrated neurovascular communication has been indicated in the context of bone regeneration, further verifying and extending the molecular portfolio involved in this interaction.
The anabolic effect of neuropeptides occurs through direct binding to bone-lineage cells and through their effects on endothelial cells. Close contact between sensory neurons and bone marrow-derived endothelial cells in cocultures has been observed.265 The administration of CGRP and SP, which are two important neuropeptides released by sensory nerves, upregulates VEGF, type 4 collagen, and matrix metalloproteinase 2.265 Interestingly, Mg2+ can induce CGRP to phosphorylate focal adhesion kinase, increasing VEGF expression and vessel and bone formation.266,267 CGRP also increases the number of endothelial progenitor cells differentiated from BMSCs in vitro via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and promotes blood vessel formation at defect sites in a DO model.268 The role of neurotrophins in neurovascular interactions during bone regeneration has also been reported. Inhibiting NGF/TrkA signaling blunts revascularization during bone regeneration, as shown by reduced numbers of CD31+ vessels within fracture sites.123 Systemic treatment with NT-3 immunoneutralization suppresses vascularization at the injury site, while recombinant NT-3 potentiates the expression of VEGF and CD31 in rat endothelial cells.206 The regulatory effect of osteoblast-derived SLIT3 on level of CD31hiEMCNhi skeletal endothelial cells is mediated by SLIT3/ROBO1 pathway, which actively participate in osteogenesis, promotes bone formation,269 and the common pathway of SLIT3 may contribute to the alignment of the reconstructed nerve fibers and newly formed blood vessels during bone regeneration. In addition, deletion of Slit3 in mice significantly impaired bone regeneration, and intravenous injection of SLIT3 in mice led to improved vascularization of the fracture callus and biomechanical properties.269 SC-conditioned medium can promote the proliferation, migration and tube formation of endothelial cells derived from BM-MSCs.250 Taken together, this evidence suggests that peripheral nerves are closely involved in angiogenesis during bone regeneration, but the questions of when and how this aligned pattern of nerves and blood vessels is recovered in complex but sequential bone regenerative processes remain unanswered.
Neuroimmune interactions during bone repair/regeneration
The nervous system and immune system are traditionally thought to work independently, but the role of the nervous system in the host immune response to infection or injury has led to more new discoveries. The expression of Toll-like receptors, which were previously thought to be specific to the immune system, has been identified on sensory nerve fiber terminals.265,266 The sensitization of sensory nerves in the inflammatory phase during bone regeneration, as described previously, has suggested additional shared molecules, such as TNF, IL-1β, and IL-17A.121 The nervous system communicates with the immune system through neurotransmitter receptors, such as muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and α- and β-adrenergic receptors, which usually act on the nervous system but have also been identified on macrophages, dendritic cells, T and B lymphocytes, and even endothelial cells.267 The concept of the neuroimmune cell unit, which refers to a place in which immune and neuronal cells are present and closely communicate, provides further clarity.270
Emerging studies on neuroimmune regulation in bone regeneration have focused on the phenotypic switch from proinflammatory M1 to regenerative M2 macrophages. Macrophages are involved in all bone regenerative processes, but the underlying mechanisms that control the switch are still not clear, despite studies in this field.271,272 The axon reflex may contribute to the neuroimmune interaction in which sensory nerves initiate the transmission of neural signals at the fracture site, and then this neuronal activation reverses to local axonal terminals before being received by the CNS. This will increase the release of neuropeptides. Receptors of SP and CGRP have been detected on mouse BMMs.158,273 After M1 activation induced by lipopolysaccharide and IFN-γ, BMMs harvested from CGRP-deficient mice showed higher expression of the M1 macrophage marker CD86 and lower expression of the M2 macrophage marker CD206 than BMMs from wild-type mice, and the expression of M1-associated factors, such as TNF-α, iNOS, and IL-1, was also increased. Supplementation of CGRP in CGRP-deficient BMMs in vitro reversed these changes.274 CGRP lentiviral vector transfection into CGRP−/− mice promoted the expression of M2-associated markers, such as Arg1 and CD206, in recruited macrophages at the injury site after tooth extraction.274 Moreover, inferior alveolar nerve transection prior to tooth extraction increased the number of recruited neutrophils and reduced the cellular elongation of macrophages, which is associated with the M1 phenotype,275 creating a proinflammatory environment.276 Implantation of CGRP-loaded microbeads into the socket after tooth exaction increased the expression of IL-10 and suppressed TNFα expression in macrophages. Local macrophage blocking by anti-F4/80 antibodies virtually eliminated the previous CGRP-induced effect.276 Recent work shows that CGRP can regulate the secretion of many osteogenic factors in M2 macrophages and promote the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by activating p-Yap1 in M2 macrophages.277
The CNS mediates reflexes in which responses generated in the CNS travel down to the autonomic nerve fiber terminals. In a clinically relevant mouse model of PTSD, mice have increased numbers of Ly6G+ neutrophils in the fracture hematoma and later callus, and this effect could be ameliorated by treatment with propranolol to improve impaired fracture healing.176 Postoperative administration of donepezil significantly lowers the infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages but hinders new bone formation.186 These results indicate that ANS regulates recruitment in the inflammatory phase of bone regeneration. Moderate inflammation in bone regeneration has been shown to be necessary for bone regeneration. The observation of neuroimmune interactions in bone regeneration provides initial evidence for a new immune regulator in the skeleton. However, these results are far from clarifying the cellular or molecular mechanisms of neuroimmune cell interactions and the specific role of this interplay during bone regeneration.
The aforementioned observations are partly consistent with the neuroimmune regulation seen in other organs. In collaboration with macrophages, CGRP can regulate the activation of PKA, reduce TNF-α production, and induce the expression of IL-10 in skin wounds.109 TRPV1+ nerves suppress immune activity by releasing CGRP.278 Other neuropeptides associated with neuroimmune regulation, including SP and VIP, have also been identified in other physiological or pathological processes and are well documented.109,120 The necessity of the “nerve, immune, bone” triad is demonstrated by the association between injured nerves, macrophage-derived NGF, and bone regeneration.132 Further examination of neuroimmune regulation in the unique bone niche should continue.
Participation of peripheral nerves in other bone disorders
A large body of preclinical data suggests multiple functions of peripheral nerves in bone pathophysiological conditions, including regenerative processes after injury. Peripheral nerves have been suggested to participate in osteoporosis, OA, bone-related tumors (especially bone metastasis),279 and bone changes related to psychosomatic illness.280,281 The interactions between peripheral nerves and cells in the bone microenvironment in different bone diseases may provide a holistic perspective of the functions of peripheral nerves in bone.
Osteoporosis is usually characterized as an aging-related endocrine disease. In fact, aging can function as a separate process with distinct mechanisms that shape the bone environment, as connecting aged mice to a youthful circulation via heterochronic parabiosis did not improve aging-induced bone loss.282 In addition to senescent cells,283 changes in nerves in bone with aging have also been noted. Leptin, a hormone that is found exclusively in adipose tissue and regulates food intake, has been discovered in hypothalamic centers and is associated with bone loss in obese mice, supporting the close link between the nervous system and bone homeostasis.284 Further research showed that low sympathetic tone resulting from leptin deficiency increased bone mass by regulating the proliferation of osteoblasts and the expression of the osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL in osteoblasts.144,173 Poor peripheral nerve function is also related to lower bone mineral density in patients.285 In osteoporosis and aging-related osteopathic disorders, innervation in bone is impaired. The peroneal nerve, which innervates the lower leg, has increased sympathetic tone in osteoporosis patients and is inversely correlated with bone quality.286 Reduced nerve fibers in the tibia are reported in mice with ovariectomy-induced bone loss and reduced expression of neuronal factors and neurotransmitters.287
OA is a chronic degenerative joint disease characterized by excruciating pain. Increased nerve ingrowth along with newly formed blood vessels in the synovium, osteophytes, and menisci are thought to be associated with OA development and progression.288 OA pain is related to increased sensory nerve fibers, and increased levels of factors such as neuropeptides, VEGF, and NGF may also induce additional pain sensation.288 Osteoclasts can release netrin-1 to induce the growth of sensory nerves and lead to pain in OA.239 Despite many new findings on anti-NGF therapy, the roles of the PNS in rapidly progressive OA and OA with severe joint degeneration require further investigation, as do the serious adverse effects of treatment.289
Conclusion
Bone regeneration is a nerve-dependent process. Continuous discoveries regarding the roles of the PNS in bone repair and regeneration shed light on musculoskeletal biology. Neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and nerve cell redifferentiation are the main features of neuro-skeletal regulation and have complex molecular mechanisms. New technologies allow in-depth investigations of the interplay of nerves and various cells in the bone at different stages of repair and regeneration.
With further understanding of the multiple functions of nerves in bone homeostasis and regeneration, new therapies to promote nerve-bone interactions will significantly improve bone repair management outcomes and reduce patients’ pain and suffering.
References
Wang, W. et al. Changes in regeneration-responsive enhancers shape regenerative capacities in vertebrates. Science 369 (2020).
Poss, K. D. Advances in understanding tissue regenerative capacity and mechanisms in animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 710–722 (2010).
Maden, M. The evolution of regeneration – where does that leave mammals? Int. J. Dev. Biol. 62, 369–372 (2018).
Tanaka, E. M. The molecular and cellular choreography of appendage regeneration. Cell 165, 1598–1608 (2016).
Kaucká, M. & Adameyko, I. Non-canonical functions of the peripheral nerve. Exp. Cell Res. 321, 17–24 (2014).
Jarret, A. et al. Enteric nervous system-derived IL-18 orchestrates mucosal barrier immunity. Cell 180, 50–63.e12 (2020).
Wang, H., Foong, J. P. P., Harris, N. L. & Bornstein, J. C. Enteric neuroimmune interactions coordinate intestinal responses in health and disease. Mucosal. Immunol. 15, 27–39 (2020).
Jessen, K. R., Mirsky, R. & Lloyd, A. C. Schwann cells: development and role in nerve repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a020487 (2015).
Yang, H. et al. HMGB1 released from nociceptors mediates inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 118, e2102034118 (2021).
Donegà, M. et al. Human-relevant near-organ neuromodulation of the immune system via the splenic nerve. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2025428118 (2021).
Liu, T. et al. Local sympathetic innervations modulate the lung innate immune responses. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay1497 (2020).
Gabanyi, I. et al. Neuro-immune interactions drive tissue programming in intestinal macrophages. Cell 164, 378–391 (2016).
Tomlinson, R. E. et al. NGF-TrkA signaling by sensory nerves coordinates the vascularization and ossification of developing endochondral bone. Cell Rep. 16, 2723–2735 (2016).
Chang, H.-M., Wu, H.-C., Sun, Z.-G., Lian, F. & Leung, P. C. K. Neurotrophins and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in the ovary: physiological and pathophysiological implications. Hum. Reprod. Update 25, 224–242 (2019).
Matsuda, H. et al. Role of nerve growth factor in cutaneous wound healing: accelerating effects in normal and healing-impaired diabetic mice. J. Exp. Med. 187, 297–306 (1998).
Meloni, M. et al. Nerve growth factor promotes cardiac repair following myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 106, 1275–1284 (2010).
Rinkevich, Y. et al. Clonal analysis reveals nerve-dependent and independent roles on mammalian hind limb tissue maintenance and regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9846–9851 (2014).
Lee, S. et al. NGF-TrkA signaling dictates neural ingrowth and aberrant osteochondral differentiation after soft tissue trauma. Nat. Commun. 12, 4939 (2021).
Todd, T. J. On the process of reproduction of the members of the aquatic salamander. Q. J. Sci. Lit. Arts 16, 84–96 (1823).
Joven, A., Elewa, A. & Simon, A. Model systems for regeneration: salamanders. Development 146, dev167700 (2019).
Boilly, B., Faulkner, S., Jobling, P. & Hondermarck, H. Nerve dependence: from regeneration to cancer. Cancer Cell 31, 342–354 (2017).
Kumar, A. & Brockes, J. P. Nerve dependence in tissue, organ, and appendage regeneration. Trends Neurosci. 35, 691–699 (2012).
Einhorn, T. A. & Gerstenfeld, L. C. Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11, 45–54 (2015).
Song, D. et al. Denervation impairs bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis in rabbit tibia lengthening. Acta Orthop. 83, 406–410 (2012).
Jones, R. E. et al. Skeletal stem cell-schwann cell circuitry in mandibular repair. Cell Rep. 28, 2757–2766.e5 (2019).
Stocum, D. L. The role of peripheral nerves in urodele limb regeneration. Eur. J. Neurosci. 34, 908–916 (2011).
Singer, M. & Egloff, F. R. L. The nervous system and regeneration of the forelimb of adult Triturus; the effect of limited nerve quantities on regeneration. J. Exp. Zool. 111, 295–314 (1949).
Endo, T., Bryant, S. V. & Gardiner, D. M. A stepwise model system for limb regeneration. Dev. Biol. 270, 135–145 (2004).
Tomlinson, B. L., Globus, M. & Vethamany-Globus, S. Promotion of mitosis in cultured newt limb regenerates by a diffusible nerve factor. Vitro 17, 167–172 (1981).
Smith, M. J., Globus, M. & Vethamany-Globus, S. Nerve extracts and substance P activate the phosphatidylinositol signaling pathway and mitogenesis in newt forelimb regenerates. Dev. Biol. 167, 239–251 (1995).
Globus, M., Smith, M. J. & Vethamany-Globus, S. Evidence supporting a mitogenic role for substance P in amphibian limb regeneration. Involvement of the inositol phospholipid signaling pathway. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 632, 396–399 (1991).
Currie, J. D. et al. Live imaging of axolotl digit regeneration reveals spatiotemporal choreography of diverse connective tissue progenitor pools. Dev. Cell 39, 411–423 (2016).
Makanae, A., Mitogawa, K. & Satoh, A. Co-operative Bmp- and Fgf-signaling inputs convert skin wound healing to limb formation in urodele amphibians. Dev. Biol. 396, 57–66 (2014).
Satoh, A., Makanae, A., Nishimoto, Y. & Mitogawa, K. FGF and BMP derived from dorsal root ganglia regulate blastema induction in limb regeneration in Ambystoma mexicanum. Dev. Biol. 417, 114–125 (2016).
Brockes, J. P. & Kintner, C. R. Glial growth factor and nerve-dependent proliferation in the regeneration blastema of Urodele amphibians. Cell 45, 301–306 (1986).
Kumar, A., Godwin, J. W., Gates, P. B., Garza-Garcia, A. A. & Brockes, J. P. Molecular basis for the nerve dependence of limb regeneration in an adult vertebrate. Science 318, 772–777 (2007).
Mescher, A. L., Connell, E., Hsu, C., Patel, C. & Overton, B. Transferrin is necessary and sufficient for the neural effect on growth in amphibian limb regeneration blastemas. Dev. Growth Differ. 39, 677–684 (1997).
Wang, L., Marchionni, M. A. & Tassava, R. A. Cloning and neuronal expression of a type III newt neuregulin and rescue of denervated, nerve-dependent newt limb blastemas by rhGGF2. J. Neurobiol. 43, 150–158 (2000).
Farkas, J. E., Freitas, P. D., Bryant, D. M., Whited, J. L. & Monaghan, J. R. Neuregulin-1 signaling is essential for nerve-dependent axolotl limb regeneration. Development 143, 2724–2731 (2016).
Rosenberg, A. F., Wolman, M. A., Franzini-Armstrong, C. & Granato, M. In vivo nerve-macrophage interactions following peripheral nerve injury. J. Neurosci. 32, 3898–3909 (2012).
Havrilak, J. A., Al-Shaer, L., Baban, N., Akinci, N. & Layden, M. J. Characterization of the dynamics and variability of neuronal subtype responses during growth, degrowth, and regeneration of Nematostella vectensis. BMC Biol. 19, 104 (2021).
Sugiyama, T. & Wanek, N. Genetic analysis of developmental mechanisms in hydra. XXI. Enhancement of regeneration in a regeneration-deficient mutant strain by the elimination of the interstitial cell lineage. Dev. Biol. 160, 64–72 (1993).
Yazawa, S., Umesono, Y., Hayashi, T., Tarui, H. & Agata, K. Planarian Hedgehog/Patched establishes anterior-posterior polarity by regulating Wnt signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22329–22334 (2009).
Huet, M. [Role of the nervous system during the regeneration of an arm in a starfish: Asterina gibbosa Penn. (Echinodermata, Asteriidae)]. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 33, 535–552 (1975).
Sehring, I. M., Jahn, C. & Weidinger, G. Zebrafish fin and heart: what’s special about regeneration? Curr. Opin. Genet Dev. 40, 48–56 (2016).
Buckley, G., Wong, J., Metcalfe, A. D. & Ferguson, M. W. J. Denervation affects regenerative responses in MRL/MpJ and repair in C57BL/6 ear wounds. J. Anat. 220, 3–12 (2012).
Johnston, A. P. W. et al. Dedifferentiated Schwann cell precursors secreting paracrine factors are required for regeneration of the mammalian digit tip. Cell Stem Cell 19, 433–448 (2016).
Stocum, D. L. Mechanisms of urodele limb regeneration. Regeneration (Oxf.) 4, 159–200 (2017).
Grassme, K. S. et al. Mechanism of action of secreted newt anterior gradient protein. PLoS One 11, e0154176 (2016).
Hay, E. D. & Fischman, D. A. Origin of the blastema in regenerating limbs of the newt Triturus viridescens. An autoradiographic study using tritiated thymidine to follow cell proliferation and migration. Dev. Biol. 3, 26–59 (1961).
Lehoczky, J. A., Robert, B. & Tabin, C. J. Mouse digit tip regeneration is mediated by fate-restricted progenitor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20609–20614 (2011).
Rinkevich, Y., Lindau, P., Ueno, H., Longaker, M. T. & Weissman, I. L. Germ-layer and lineage-restricted stem/progenitors regenerate the mouse digit tip. Nature 476, 409–413 (2011).
Stewart, S. & Stankunas, K. Limited dedifferentiation provides replacement tissue during zebrafish fin regeneration. Dev. Biol. 365, 339–349 (2012).
Storer, M. A. et al. Acquisition of a unique mesenchymal precursor-like blastema state underlies successful adult mammalian digit tip regeneration. Dev. Cell 52, 509–524.e9 (2020).
Carr, M. J. et al. Mesenchymal precursor cells in adult nerves contribute to mammalian tissue repair and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 24, 240–256.e9 (2019).
Pirotte, N., Leynen, N., Artois, T. & Smeets, K. Do you have the nerves to regenerate? The importance of neural signalling in the regeneration process. Dev. Biol. 409, 4–15 (2016).
Hunt, S. P. & Mantyh, P. W. The molecular dynamics of pain control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 83–91 (2001).
Abraira, V. E. & Ginty, D. D. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron 79, 618–639 (2013).
Jimenez-Andrade, J. M. et al. Capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerve fibers contribute to the generation and maintenance of skeletal fracture pain. Neuroscience 162, 1244–1254 (2009).
Ivanusic, J. J., Mahns, D. A., Sahai, V. & Rowe, M. J. Absence of large-diameter sensory fibres in a nerve to the cat humerus. J. Anat. 208, 251–255 (2006).
Castañeda-Corral, G. et al. The majority of myelinated and unmyelinated sensory nerve fibers that innervate bone express the tropomyosin receptor kinase A. Neuroscience 178, 196–207 (2011).
Nencini, S. & Ivanusic, J. Mechanically sensitive Aδ nociceptors that innervate bone marrow respond to changes in intra-osseous pressure. J. Physiol. 595, 4399–4415 (2017).
Dale Purves, G. J. A., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W. C., LaMantia, A.-S. & White, L. E. Neuroscience. 5th edn (Sinauer Associates, 2012).
Eisenhofer, G., Kopin, I. J. & Goldstein, D. S. Catecholamine metabolism: a contemporary view with implications for physiology and medicine. Pharm. Rev. 56, 331–349 (2004).
Espay, A. J., LeWitt, P. A. & Kaufmann, H. Norepinephrine deficiency in Parkinson’s disease: the case for noradrenergic enhancement. Mov. Disord. 29, 1710–1719 (2014).
Ekblad, E. et al. Neuropeptide Y co-exists and co-operates with noradrenaline in perivascular nerve fibers. Regul. Pept. 8, 225–235 (1984).
Picciotto, M. R., Higley, M. J. & Mineur, Y. S. Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron 76, 116–129 (2012).
Hoover, D. B. Cholinergic modulation of the immune system presents new approaches for treating inflammation. Pharmacol. Ther. 179, 1–16 (2017).
Mashaghi, A. et al. Neuropeptide substance P and the immune response. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 73, 4249–4264 (2016).
Russell, F. A., King, R., Smillie, S. J., Kodji, X. & Brain, S. D. Calcitonin gene-related peptide: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 94, 1099–1142 (2014).
Hill, E. L. & Elde, R. Distribution of CGRP-, VIP-, D beta H-, SP-, and NPY-immunoreactive nerves in the periosteum of the rat. Cell Tissue Res. 264, 469–480 (1991).
Bjurholm, A., Kreicbergs, A., Brodin, E. & Schultzberg, M. Substance P- and CGRP-immunoreactive nerves in bone. Peptides 9, 165–171 (1988).
Woolf, C. J. & Ma, Q. Nociceptors-noxious stimulus detectors. Neuron 55, 353–364 (2007).
Zhong, J., Pevny, L. & Snider, W. D. “Runx“ing towards sensory differentiation. Neuron 49, 325–327 (2006).
Lallemend, F. & Ernfors, P. Molecular interactions underlying the specification of sensory neurons. Trends Neurosci. 35, 373–381 (2012).
Lorenz, M. R., Brazill, J. M., Beeve, A. T., Shen, I. & Scheller, E. L. A Neuroskeletal Atlas: spatial mapping and contextualization of axon subtypes innervating the long bones of C3H and B6 mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 36, 1012–1025 (2021).
Mach, D. B. et al. Origins of skeletal pain: sensory and sympathetic innervation of the mouse femur. Neuroscience 113, 155–166 (2002).
Matsuo, K. et al. Innervation of the tibial epiphysis through the intercondylar foramen. Bone 120, 297–304 (2019).
Anderson, C. R., Bergner, A. & Murphy, S. M. How many types of cholinergic sympathetic neuron are there in the rat stellate ganglion? Neuroscience 140, 567–576 (2006).
Asmus, S. E., Tian, H. & Landis, S. C. Induction of cholinergic function in cultured sympathetic neurons by periosteal cells: cellular mechanisms. Dev. Biol. 235, 1–11 (2001).
Bajayo, A. et al. Skeletal parasympathetic innervation communicates central IL-1 signals regulating bone mass accrual. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15455–15460 (2012).
Salhotra, A., Shah, H. N., Levi, B. & Longaker, M. T. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 696–711 (2020).
Xing, W., Cheng, S., Wergedal, J. & Mohan, S. Epiphyseal chondrocyte secondary ossification centers require thyroid hormone activation of Indian hedgehog and osterix signaling. J. Bone Min. Res. 29, 2262–2275 (2014).
Sisask, G., Silfverswärd, C. J., Bjurholm, A. & Nilsson, O. Ontogeny of sensory and autonomic nerves in the developing mouse skeleton. Auton. Neurosci. 177, 237–243 (2013).
Sudiwala, S. & Knox, S. M. The emerging role of cranial nerves in shaping craniofacial development. Genesis 57, e23282 (2019).
Ramaesh, T. & Bard, J. B. L. The growth and morphogenesis of the early mouse mandible: a quantitative analysis. J. Anat. 203, 213–222 (2003).
Tower, R. J. et al. Spatial transcriptomics reveals a role for sensory nerves in preserving cranial suture patency through modulation of BMP/TGF-β signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2103087118 (2021).
Carmeliet, P. & Tessier-Lavigne, M. Common mechanisms of nerve and blood vessel wiring. Nature 436, 193–200 (2005).
Wehrwein, E. A., Orer, H. S. & Barman, S. M. Overview of the anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology of the autonomic nervous system. Compr. Physiol. 6, 1239–1278 (2016).
Evans, S. F., Chang, H. & Knothe Tate, M. L. Elucidating multiscale periosteal mechanobiology: a key to unlocking the smart properties and regenerative capacity of the periosteum? Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 19, 147–159 (2013).
Clarke, B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3, S131–S139 (2008).
Chartier, S. R., Mitchell, S. A. T., Majuta, L. A. & Mantyh, P. W. The changing sensory and sympathetic innervation of the young, adult and aging mouse femur. Neuroscience 387, 178–190 (2018).
Pazzaglia, U. E., Congiu, T., Raspanti, M., Ranchetti, F. & Quacci, D. Anatomy of the intracortical canal system: scanning electron microscopy study in rabbit femur. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467, 2446–2456 (2009).
Marrella, A. et al. Engineering vascularized and innervated bone biomaterials for improved skeletal tissue regeneration. Mater. Today (Kidlington) 21, 362–376 (2018).
Grönblad, M., Liesi, P., Korkala, O., Karaharju, E. & Polak, J. Innervation of human bone periosteum by peptidergic nerves. Anat. Rec. 209, 297–299 (1984).
Ralston, H. J., Miller, M. R. & Kasahara, M. Nerve endings in human fasciae, tendons, ligaments, periosteum, and joint synovial membrane. Anat. Rec. 136, 137–147 (1960).
Steverink, J. G. et al. Sensory innervation of human bone: an immunohistochemical study to further understand bone pain. J. Pain. 22, 1385–1395 (2021).
Martin, C. D., Jimenez-Andrade, J. M., Ghilardi, J. R. & Mantyh, P. W. Organization of a unique net-like meshwork of CGRP+ sensory fibers in the mouse periosteum: implications for the generation and maintenance of bone fracture pain. Neurosci. Lett. 427, 148–152 (2007).
Liu, K., Tedeschi, A., Park, K. K. & He, Z. Neuronal intrinsic mechanisms of axon regeneration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 131–152 (2011).
Burnett, M. G. & Zager, E. L. Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury: a brief review. Neurosurg. Focus 16, E1 (2004).
Shin, J. E., Ha, H., Kim, Y. K., Cho, Y. & DiAntonio, A. DLK regulates a distinctive transcriptional regeneration program after peripheral nerve injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 127, 178–192 (2019).
Shin, J. E., Ha, H., Cho, E. H., Kim, Y. K. & Cho, Y. Comparative analysis of the transcriptome of injured nerve segments reveals spatiotemporal responses to neural damage in mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 526, 1195–1208 (2018).
Villar, M. J. et al. Further studies on galanin-, substance P-, and CGRP-like immunoreactivities in primary sensory neurons and spinal cord: effects of dorsal rhizotomies and sciatic nerve lesions. Exp. Neurol. 112, 29–39 (1991).
Noguchi, K., Senba, E., Morita, Y., Sato, M. & Tohyama, M. Alpha-CGRP and beta-CGRP mRNAs are differentially regulated in the rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 7, 299–304 (1990).
Hökfelt, T., Zhang, X. & Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z. Messenger plasticity in primary sensory neurons following axotomy and its functional implications. Trends Neurosci. 17, 22–30 (1994).
Li, X.-Q., Verge, V. M. K., Johnston, J. M. & Zochodne, D. W. CGRP peptide and regenerating sensory axons. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 63, 1092–1103 (2004).
Zhang, Y. et al. Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats. Nat. Med. 22, 1160–1169 (2016).
Li, J. et al. Occurrence of substance P in bone repair under different load comparison of straight and angulated fracture in rat tibia. J. Orthop. Res. 28, 1643–1650 (2010).
Pinho-Ribeiro, F. A., Verri, W. A. & Chiu, I. M. Nociceptor sensory neuron-immune interactions in pain and inflammation. Trends Immunol. 38, 5–19 (2017).
Terenzio, M. et al. Locally translated mTOR controls axonal local translation in nerve injury. Science 359, 1416–1421 (2018).
Scheib, J. & Höke, A. Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 668–676 (2013).
Rigoni, M. & Negro, S. Signals orchestrating peripheral nerve repair. Cells 9, 1768 (2020).
Chen, P., Piao, X. & Bonaldo, P. Role of macrophages in Wallerian degeneration and axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury. Acta Neuropathol. 130, 605–618 (2015).
Dubový, P. Wallerian degeneration and peripheral nerve conditions for both axonal regeneration and neuropathic pain induction. Ann. Anat. 193, 267–275 (2011).
Ivanusic, J. J., Sahai, V. & Mahns, D. A. The cortical representation of sensory inputs arising from bone. Brain Res. 1269, 47–53 (2009).
Blackwell, K. A., Raisz, L. G. & Pilbeam, C. C. Prostaglandins in bone: bad cop, good cop? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 21, 294–301 (2010).
Nencini, S., Ringuet, M., Kim, D.-H., Greenhill, C. & Ivanusic, J. J. GDNF, neurturin, and artemin activate and sensitize bone afferent neurons and contribute to inflammatory bone pain. J. Neurosci. 38, 4899–4911 (2018).
Ghilardi, J. R. et al. Sustained blockade of neurotrophin receptors TrkA, TrkB and TrkC reduces non-malignant skeletal pain but not the maintenance of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers. Bone 48, 389–398 (2011).
McMahon, S. B., La Russa, F. & Bennett, D. L. H. Crosstalk between the nociceptive and immune systems in host defence and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 389–402 (2015).
Schiller, M., Ben-Shaanan, T. L. & Rolls, A. Neuronal regulation of immunity: why, how and where? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 20–36 (2021).
Baral, P., Udit, S. & Chiu, I. M. Pain and immunity: implications for host defence. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 433–447 (2019).
Gudes, S. et al. The role of slow and persistent TTX-resistant sodium currents in acute tumor necrosis factor-α-mediated increase in nociceptors excitability. J. Neurophysiol. 113, 601–619 (2015).
Li, Z. et al. Fracture repair requires TrkA signaling by skeletal sensory nerves. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 5137–5150 (2019).
Skene, J. H. Axonal growth-associated proteins. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 127–156 (1989).
Feng, G. et al. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 28, 41–51 (2000).
Filipowska, J., Tomaszewski, K. A., Niedźwiedzki, Ł., Walocha, J. A. & Niedźwiedzki, T. The role of vasculature in bone development, regeneration and proper systemic functioning. Angiogenesis 20, 291–302 (2017).
Li, J., Ahmad, T., Spetea, M., Ahmed, M. & Kreicbergs, A. Bone reinnervation after fracture: a study in the rat. J. Bone Min. Res. 16, 1505–1510 (2001).
Chartier, S. R. et al. Exuberant sprouting of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers in nonhealed bone fractures and the generation and maintenance of chronic skeletal pain. Pain 155, 2323–2336 (2014).
Yasui, M. et al. Nerve growth factor and associated nerve sprouting contribute to local mechanical hyperalgesia in a rat model of bone injury. Eur. J. Pain 16, 953–965 (2012).
Singer, M. The influence of the nerve in regeneration of the amphibian extremity. Q Rev. Biol. 27, 169–200 (1952).
Li, J., Kreicbergs, A., Bergström, J., Stark, A. & Ahmed, M. Site-specific CGRP innervation coincides with bone formation during fracture healing and modeling: a study in rat angulated tibia. J. Orthop. Res. 25, 1204–1212 (2007).
Meyers, C. A. et al. A neurotrophic mechanism directs sensory nerve transit in cranial bone. Cell Rep. 31, 107696 (2020).
Mantyh, P. W. The neurobiology of skeletal pain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 39, 508–519 (2014).
Indo, Y. NGF-dependent neurons and neurobiology of emotions and feelings: Lessons from congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 87, 1–16 (2018).
Niedermair, T. et al. Absence of substance P and the sympathetic nervous system impact on bone structure and chondrocyte differentiation in an adult model of endochondral ossification. Matrix Biol. 38, 22–35 (2014).
Landes, E. K., Konda, S. R., Davidovitch, R. & Egol, K. A. Can we predict the need for unplanned reoperation after nonunion repair. J. Orthop. Trauma 35, 654–659 (2021).
Toscano, E. et al. Multisystem involvement in congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA), a nerve growth factor receptor(Trk A)-related disorder. Neuropediatrics 31, 39–41 (2000).
Nordström, D. et al. Symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis. Neuroimmunologic studies. Spine (Philos. Pa 1976) 19, 2752–2758 (1994).
Wang, X.-D. et al. The neural system regulates bone homeostasis via mesenchymal stem cells: a translational approach. Theranostics 10, 4839–4850 (2020).
Wang, L. et al. Preventing early-stage graft bone resorption by simultaneous innervation: innervated iliac bone flap for mandibular reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 139, 1152e–1161e (2017).
Bjurholm, A. Neuroendocrine peptides in bone. Int. Orthop. 15, 325–329 (1991).
Serre, C. M., Farlay, D., Delmas, P. D. & Chenu, C. Evidence for a dense and intimate innervation of the bone tissue, including glutamate-containing fibers. Bone 25, 623–629 (1999).
Dénes, A. et al. Central autonomic control of the bone marrow: multisynaptic tract tracing by recombinant pseudorabies virus. Neuroscience 134, 947–963 (2005).
Takeda, S. et al. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell 111, 305–317 (2002).
Steenbergh, P. H. et al. Structure and expression of the human calcitonin/CGRP genes. FEBS Lett. 209, 97–103 (1986).
Xu, J. et al. The effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide on bone homeostasis and regeneration. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 18, 621–632 (2020).
Brain, S. D. & Grant, A. D. Vascular actions of calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin. Physiol. Rev. 84, 903–934 (2004).
Appelt, J. et al. The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide alpha is essential for bone healing. EBioMedicine 59, 102970 (2020).
Jia, S. et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide enhances osteogenic differentiation and recruitment of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 18, 1039–1046 (2019).
Zhou, R., Yuan, Z., Liu, J. & Liu, J. Calcitonin gene-related peptide promotes the expression of osteoblastic genes and activates the WNT signal transduction pathway in bone marrow stromal stem cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 13, 4689–4696 (2016).
Mrak, E. et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibits apoptosis in human osteoblasts by β-catenin stabilization. J. Cell Physiol. 225, 701–708 (2010).
Zhang, Q. et al. Receptor activity-modifying protein 1 regulates the phenotypic expression of BMSCs via the Hippo/Yap pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 234, 13969–13976 (2019).
Cao, Y. Q. et al. Primary afferent tachykinins are required to experience moderate to intense pain. Nature 392, 390–394 (1998).
Villa, I., Mrak, E., Rubinacci, A., Ravasi, F. & Guidobono, F. CGRP inhibits osteoprotegerin production in human osteoblast-like cells via cAMP/PKA-dependent pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 291, C529–C537 (2006).
Mi, J. et al. Implantable electrical stimulation at dorsal root ganglions accelerates osteoporotic fracture healing via calcitonin gene-related peptide. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 9, e2103005 (2022).
Liu, H.-J. et al. Substance P promotes the proliferation, but inhibits differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts from rats with spinal cord injury via RANKL/OPG system. PLoS One 11, e0165063 (2016).
Goto, T. et al. Substance P stimulates late-stage rat osteoblastic bone formation through neurokinin-1 receptors. Neuropeptides 41, 25–31 (2007).
Wang, L. et al. Substance P stimulates bone marrow stromal cell osteogenic activity, osteoclast differentiation, and resorption activity in vitro. Bone 45, 309–320 (2009).
Aoki, M., Tamai, K. & Saotome, K. Substance P- and calcitonin gene-related peptide-immunofluorescent nerves in the repair of experimental bone defects. Int. Orthop. 18, 317–324 (1994).
Zou, Z. et al. Correlation of neuropeptides substance P and neuropeptide Y and their receptors with fracture healing in rats. Mater. Express 10, 240–250 (2020).
Fu, S. et al. Neuropeptide substance P improves osteoblastic and angiogenic differentiation capacity of bone marrow stem cells in vitro. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 596023 (2014).
Mei, G. et al. Substance P activates the Wnt signal transduction pathway and enhances the differentiation of mouse preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 6224–6240 (2014).
Mu, C. et al. Substance P-embedded multilayer on titanium substrates promotes local osseointegration via MSC recruitment. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 1212–1222 (2020).
Hofman, M. et al. Effect of neurokinin-1-receptor blockage on fracture healing in rats. Sci. Rep. 9, 9744 (2019).
Togari, A. Adrenergic regulation of bone metabolism: possible involvement of sympathetic innervation of osteoblastic and osteoclastic cells. Microsc. Res. Tech. 58, 77–84 (2002).
Niedermair, T., Straub, R. H., Brochhausen, C. & Grässel, S. Impact of the sensory and sympathetic nervous system on fracture healing in ovariectomized mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 405 (2020).
Fonseca, T. L. et al. Double disruption of α2A- and α2C-adrenoceptors results in sympathetic hyperactivity and high-bone-mass phenotype. J. Bone Min. Res. 26, 591–603 (2011).
Huang, H. H., Brennan, T. C., Muir, M. M. & Mason, R. S. Functional alpha1- and beta2-adrenergic receptors in human osteoblasts. J. Cell Physiol. 220, 267–275 (2009).
Tanaka, K. et al. α1B -Adrenoceptor signalling regulates bone formation through the up-regulation of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein δ expression in osteoblasts. Br. J. Pharm. 173, 1058–1069 (2016).
Kajimura, D. et al. Genetic determination of the cellular basis of the sympathetic regulation of bone mass accrual. J. Exp. Med. 208, 841–851 (2011).
Chen, H. et al. Prostaglandin E2 mediates sensory nerve regulation of bone homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 10, 181 (2019).
Hedderich, J. et al. Norepinephrine inhibits the proliferation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via β2-adrenoceptor-mediated ERK1/2 and PKA phosphorylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3924 (2020).
Elefteriou, F. et al. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature 434, 514–520 (2005).
Liang, H. et al. Selective β2-adrenoreceptor signaling regulates osteoclastogenesis via modulating RANKL production and neuropeptides expression in osteocytic MLO-Y4 cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 120, 7238–7247 (2019).
Al-Subaie, A. E. et al. Propranolol enhances bone healing and implant osseointegration in rats tibiae. J. Clin. Periodontol. 43, 1160–1170 (2016).
Haffner-Luntzer, M. et al. Chronic psychosocial stress compromises the immune response and endochondral ossification during bone fracture healing via β-AR signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8615–8622 (2019).
Khosla, S. et al. Sympathetic β1-adrenergic signaling contributes to regulation of human bone metabolism. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 4832–4842 (2018).
Han, J. et al. DNA synthesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through alpha1-adrenergic receptors. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 490, 96–102 (2009).
Grässel, S. G. The role of peripheral nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in cartilage and bone physiology and pathophysiology. Arthritis Res. Ther. 16, 485 (2014).
Golan, K., Kollet, O., Markus, R. P. & Lapidot, T. Daily light and darkness onset and circadian rhythms metabolically synchronize hematopoietic stem cell differentiation and maintenance: the role of bone marrow norepinephrine, tumor necrosis factor, and melatonin cycles. Exp. Hematol. 78, 1–10 (2019).
Sato, T. et al. Functional role of acetylcholine and the expression of cholinergic receptors and components in osteoblasts. FEBS Lett. 584, 817–824 (2010).
Liu, P.-S., Chen, Y.-Y., Feng, C.-K., Lin, Y.-H. & Yu, T.-C. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors present in human osteoblast and bone tissue. Eur. J. Pharm. 650, 34–40 (2011).
Hu, H. et al. Prenatal nicotine exposure retards osteoclastogenesis and endochondral ossification in fetal long bones in rats. Toxicol. Lett. 295, 249–255 (2018).
Negishi-Koga, T. & Takayanagi, H. Ca2+-NFATc1 signaling is an essential axis of osteoclast differentiation. Immunol. Rev. 231, 241–256 (2009).
Mandl, P. et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors modulate osteoclastogenesis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 18, 63 (2016).
Al-Hamed, F. S. et al. Postoperative administration of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil, interferes with bone healing and implant osseointegration in a rat model. Biomolecules 10, 1318 (2020).
Eimar, H. et al. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and healing of hip fracture in Alzheimer’s disease patients: a retrospective cohort study. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 13, 454–463 (2013).
Shi, Y. et al. Signaling through the M(3) muscarinic receptor favors bone mass accrual by decreasing sympathetic activity. Cell Metab. 11, 231–238 (2010).
Allison, S. J., Baldock, P. A. & Herzog, H. The control of bone remodeling by neuropeptide Y receptors. Peptides 28, 320–325 (2007).
Igwe, J. C. et al. Neuropeptide Y is expressed by osteocytes and can inhibit osteoblastic activity. J. Cell. Biochem. 108, 621–630 (2009).
Yu, W. et al. Inhibition of Y1 receptor promotes osteogenesis in bone marrow stromal cells cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 11, 583105 (2020).
Lee, N. J. et al. Critical role for Y1 receptors in mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation and osteoblast activity. J. Bone Min. Res. 25, 1736–1747 (2010).
Liu, S. et al. [Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor antagonist PD160170 promotes osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and femoral defect repair in rats]. Nan Fang. Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 38, 669–676 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. Neuronal induction of bone-fat imbalance through osteocyte neuropeptide Y. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 8, e2100808 (2021).
Udit, S., Blake, K. & Chiu, I. M. Somatosensory and autonomic neuronal regulation of the immune response. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 157–171 (2022).
Henning, R. J. & Sawmiller, D. R. Vasoactive intestinal peptide: cardiovascular effects. Cardiovasc. Res. 49, 27–37 (2001).
Shi, L. et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide stimulates bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells osteogenesis differentiation by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promotes rat skull defect repair. Stem Cells Dev. 29, 655–666 (2020).
Rameshwar, P. et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) inhibits the proliferation of bone marrow progenitors through the VPAC1 receptor. Exp. Hematol. 30, 1001–1009 (2002).
Shi, L. et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide promotes fracture healing in sympathectomized mice. Calcif. Tissue Int. 109, 55–65 (2021).
Allen, S. J., Watson, J. J., Shoemark, D. K., Barua, N. U. & Patel, N. K. GDNF, NGF and BDNF as therapeutic options for neurodegeneration. Pharm. Ther. 138, 155–175 (2013).
Park, H. & Poo, M.-M. Neurotrophin regulation of neural circuit development and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 7–23 (2013).
Asaumi, K., Nakanishi, T., Asahara, H., Inoue, H. & Takigawa, M. Expression of neurotrophins and their receptors (TRK) during fracture healing. Bone 26, 625–633 (2000).
Kilian, O. et al. BDNF and its TrkB receptor in human fracture healing. Ann. Anat. 196, 286–295 (2014).
Xian, C. J. & Zhou, X.-F. Treating skeletal pain: limitations of conventional anti-inflammatory drugs, and anti-neurotrophic factor as a possible alternative. Nat. Clin. Pr. Rheumatol. 5, 92–98 (2009).
Zha, K. et al. Nerve growth factor (NGF) and NGF receptors in mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: impact on potential therapies. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 10, 1008–1020 (2021).
Su, Y.-W. et al. Neurotrophin-3 induces BMP-2 and VEGF activities and promotes the bony repair of injured growth plate cartilage and bone in rats. J. Bone Min. Res. 31, 1258–1274 (2016).
Yada, M., Yamaguchi, K. & Tsuji, T. NGF stimulates differentiation of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 205, 1187–1193 (1994).
Mogi, M., Kondo, A., Kinpara, K. & Togari, A. Anti-apoptotic action of nerve growth factor in mouse osteoblastic cell line. Life Sci. 67, 1197–1206 (2000).
Yang, S. et al. Effects of exogenous nerve growth factor on the expression of BMP-9 and VEGF in the healing of rabbit mandible fracture with local nerve injury. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 16, 74 (2021).
Rivera, K. O. et al. Local injections of β-NGF accelerates endochondral fracture repair by promoting cartilage to bone conversion. Sci. Rep. 10, 22241 (2020).
Koewler, N. J. et al. Effects of a monoclonal antibody raised against nerve growth factor on skeletal pain and bone healing after fracture of the C57BL/6J mouse femur. J. Bone Min. Res. 22, 1732–1742 (2007).
Rapp, A. E. et al. Analgesia via blockade of NGF/TrkA signaling does not influence fracture healing in mice. J. Orthop. Res. 33, 1235–1241 (2015).
Yang, B., Ma, T.-Y. & Ma, W. [New research of nerve growth factor on fracture healing]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 42, 546–551 (2020).
Pezet, S. & McMahon, S. B. Neurotrophins: mediators and modulators of pain. Annu Rev. Neurosci. 29, 507–538 (2006).
Liu, Q., Lei, L., Yu, T., Jiang, T. & Kang, Y. Effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on the neurogenesis and osteogenesis in bone engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 24, 1283–1292 (2018).
Zhang, Z., Hu, P., Wang, Z., Qiu, X. & Chen, Y. BDNF promoted osteoblast migration and fracture healing by up-regulating integrin β1 via TrkB-mediated ERK1/2 and AKT signalling. J. Cell Mol. Med. 24, 10792–10802 (2020).
Ai, L.-S. et al. Inhibition of BDNF in multiple myeloma blocks osteoclastogenesis via down-regulated stroma-derived RANKL expression both in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One 7, e46287 (2012).
Li, X., Sun, D. C., Li, Y. & Wu, X. Y. Neurotrophin-3 improves fracture healing in rats. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 22, 2439–2446 (2018).
Mizuno, N. et al. Effect of neurotrophins on differentiation, calcification and proliferation in cultures of human pulp cells. Cell Biol. Int. 31, 1462–1469 (2007).
Mizuno, N. et al. Effect of neurotrophin-4/5 on bone/cementum-related protein expressions and DNA synthesis in cultures of human periodontal ligament cells. J. Periodontol. 79, 2182–2189 (2008).
Seiradake, E., Jones, E. Y. & Klein, R. Structural perspectives on axon guidance. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 577–608 (2016).
Stoeckli, E. T. Understanding axon guidance: are we nearly there yet? Development 145, dev151415 (2018).
Fukuda, T. et al. Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations. Nature 497, 490–493 (2013).
Hayashi, M. et al. Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A. Nature 485, 69–74 (2012).
Kenan, S. et al. Investigation of the effects of semaphorin 3A on new bone formation in a rat calvarial defect model. J. Craniomaxillofac Surg. 47, 473–483 (2019).
Li, Y., Yang, L., He, S. & Hu, J. The effect of semaphorin 3A on fracture healing in osteoporotic rats. J. Orthop. Sci. 20, 1114–1121 (2015).
Hughes, A., Kleine-Albers, J., Helfrich, M. H., Ralston, S. H. & Rogers, M. J. A class III semaphorin (Sema3e) inhibits mouse osteoblast migration and decreases osteoclast formation in vitro. Calcif. Tissue Int. 90, 151–162 (2012).
Negishi-Koga, T. et al. Suppression of bone formation by osteoclastic expression of semaphorin 4D. Nat. Med. 17, 1473–1480 (2011).
Zhang, Y., Wei, L., Miron, R. J., Shi, B. & Bian, Z. Bone scaffolds loaded with siRNA-Semaphorin4d for the treatment of osteoporosis related bone defects. Sci. Rep. 6, 26925 (2016).
Kania, A. & Klein, R. Mechanisms of ephrin-Eph signalling in development, physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 240–256 (2016).
Xing, W., Kim, J., Wergedal, J., Chen, S.-T. & Mohan, S. Ephrin B1 regulates bone marrow stromal cell differentiation and bone formation by influencing TAZ transactivation via complex formation with NHERF1. Mol. Cell Biol. 30, 711–721 (2010).
Arthur, A. et al. EphB/ephrin-B interactions mediate human MSC attachment, migration and osteochondral differentiation. Bone 48, 533–542 (2011).
Wang, Y. et al. Ephrin B2/EphB4 mediates the actions of IGF-I signaling in regulating endochondral bone formation. J. Bone Min. Res. 29, 1900–1913 (2014).
Allan, E. H. et al. EphrinB2 regulation by PTH and PTHrP revealed by molecular profiling in differentiating osteoblasts. J. Bone Min. Res. 23, 1170–1181 (2008).
Arthur, A., Paton, S., Zannettino, A. C. W. & Gronthos, S. Conditional knockout of ephrinB1 in osteogenic progenitors delays the process of endochondral ossification during fracture repair. Bone 132, 115189 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. Ablation of Ephrin B2 in Col2 expressing cells delays fracture repair. Endocrinology 161, bqaa179 (2020).
Kim, B.-J. et al. Osteoclast-secreted SLIT3 coordinates bone resorption and formation. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 1429–1441 (2018).
Mediero, A., Ramkhelawon, B., Perez-Aso, M., Moore, K. J. & Cronstein, B. N. Netrin-1 is a critical autocrine/paracrine factor for osteoclast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 30, 837–854 (2015).
Zhu, S. et al. Subchondral bone osteoclasts induce sensory innervation and osteoarthritis pain. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 1076–1093 (2019).
Nakanishi, M. & Rosenberg, D. W. Multifaceted roles of PGE2 in inflammation and cancer. Semin Immunopathol. 35, 123–137 (2013).
Hu, B. et al. Sensory nerves regulate mesenchymal stromal cell lineage commitment by tuning sympathetic tones. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 3483–3498 (2020).
Lisowska, B., Kosson, D. & Domaracka, K. Positives and negatives of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in bone healing: the effects of these drugs on bone repair. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 12, 1809–1814 (2018).
Che, T., Dwivedi-Agnihotri, H., Shukla, A. K. & Roth, B. L. Biased ligands at opioid receptors: current status and future directions. Sci. Signal 14, eaav0320 (2021).
Zura, R. et al. Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 151, e162775 (2016).
Buchheit, T. et al. Opioid exposure is associated with nonunion risk in a traumatically injured population: an inception cohort study. Injury 49, 1266–1271 (2018).
Zheng, C. et al. COX-2/PGE2 facilitates fracture healing by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 23, 9721–9728 (2019).
Zhang, X. et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 regulates mesenchymal cell differentiation into the osteoblast lineage and is critically involved in bone repair. J. Clin. Invest. 109, 1405–1415 (2002).
Yoshida, K. et al. Stimulation of bone formation and prevention of bone loss by prostaglandin E EP4 receptor activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4580–4585 (2002).
Gao, X. et al. Nociceptive nerves regulate haematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Nature 589, 591–596 (2021).
Zhang, X. et al. Schwann cells promote prevascularization and osteogenesis of tissue-engineered bone via bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived endothelial cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12, 382 (2021).
Wu, Z. et al. Schwann Cell-derived exosomes promote bone regeneration and repair by enhancing the biological activity of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 531, 559–565 (2020).
Xie, M. et al. Schwann cell precursors contribute to skeletal formation during embryonic development in mice and zebrafish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15068–15073 (2019).
Kaukua, N. et al. Glial origin of mesenchymal stem cells in a tooth model system. Nature 513, 551–554 (2014).
Chen, B., Banton, M. C., Singh, L., Parkinson, D. B. & Dun, X.-P. Single cell transcriptome data analysis defines the heterogeneity of peripheral nerve cells in homeostasis and regeneration. Front. Cell Neurosci. 15, 624826 (2021).
Roelofs, A. J., Thompson, K., Gordon, S. & Rogers, M. J. Molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: current status. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 6222s–6230s (2006).
Xie, D. et al. Sensory denervation increases potential of bisphosphonates to induce osteonecrosis via disproportionate expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1487, 56–73 (2021).
Tuzmen, C. & Campbell, P. G. Crosstalk between neuropeptides SP and CGRP in regulation of BMP2-induced bone differentiation. Connect Tissue Res. 59, 81–90 (2018).
Drissi, H., Hott, M., Marie, P. J. & Lasmoles, F. Expression of the CT/CGRP gene and its regulation by dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate in human osteoblastic cells. J. Bone Min. Res. 12, 1805–1814 (1997).
Zhang, R., Liang, Y. & Wei, S. The expressions of NGF and VEGF in the fracture tissues are closely associated with accelerated clavicle fracture healing in patients with traumatic brain injury. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 14, 2315–2322 (2018).
Potente, M., Gerhardt, H. & Carmeliet, P. Basic and therapeutic aspects of angiogenesis. Cell 146, 873–887 (2011).
Martin, P. & Lewis, J. Origins of the neurovascular bundle: interactions between developing nerves and blood vessels in embryonic chick skin. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 33, 379–387 (1989).
Mukouyama, Y.-S., Gerber, H.-P., Ferrara, N., Gu, C. & Anderson, D. J. Peripheral nerve-derived VEGF promotes arterial differentiation via neuropilin 1-mediated positive feedback. Development 132, 941–952 (2005).
Li, W. et al. Peripheral nerve-derived CXCL12 and VEGF-A regulate the patterning of arterial vessel branching in developing limb skin. Dev. Cell 24, 359–371 (2013).
Hjelmeland, A. B., Lathia, J. D., Sathornsumetee, S. & Rich, J. N. Twisted tango: brain tumor neurovascular interactions. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1375–1381 (2011).
Hosoi, T., Okuma, Y., Matsuda, T. & Nomura, Y. Novel pathway for LPS-induced afferent vagus nerve activation: possible role of nodose ganglion. Auton. Neurosci. 120, 104–107 (2005).
Xu, Z.-Z. et al. Inhibition of mechanical allodynia in neuropathic pain by TLR5-mediated A-fiber blockade. Nat. Med. 21, 1326–1331 (2015).
Pavlov, V. A., Chavan, S. S. & Tracey, K. J. Molecular and functional neuroscience in immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 36, 783–812 (2018).
Mi, J. et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide enhances distraction osteogenesis by increasing angiogenesis. Tissue Eng. Part A 27, 87–102 (2021).
Xu, R. et al. Targeting skeletal endothelium to ameliorate bone loss. Nat. Med. 24, 823–833 (2018).
Godinho-Silva, C., Cardoso, F. & Veiga-Fernandes, H. Neuro-immune cell units: a new paradigm in physiology. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 37, 19–46 (2019).
Pajarinen, J. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials 196, 80–89 (2019).
Shapouri-Moghaddam, A. et al. Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J. Cell Physiol. 233, 6425–6440 (2018).
Wang, L. et al. Calcitonin-gene-related peptide stimulates stromal cell osteogenic differentiation and inhibits RANKL induced NF-kappaB activation, osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Bone 46, 1369–1379 (2010).
Yuan, Y. et al. Deficiency of calcitonin gene-related peptide affects macrophage polarization in osseointegration. Front. Physiol. 11, 733 (2020).
McWhorter, F. Y., Wang, T., Nguyen, P., Chung, T. & Liu, W. F. Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17253–17258 (2013).
Xu, Y. et al. Inferior alveolar nerve transection disturbs innate immune responses and bone healing after tooth extraction. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1448, 52–64 (2019).
Zhang, Q. et al. CGRP-modulated M2 macrophages regulate osteogenesis of MC3T3-E1 via Yap1. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 697, 108697 (2021).
Baral, P. et al. Nociceptor sensory neurons suppress neutrophil and γδ T cell responses in bacterial lung infections and lethal pneumonia. Nat. Med. 24, 417–426 (2018).
Clézardin, P. et al. Bone metastasis: mechanisms, therapies, and biomarkers. Physiol. Rev. 101, 797–855 (2021).
Gold, D. T. & Solimeo, S. Osteoporosis and depression: a historical perspective. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 4, 134–139 (2006).
Kelly, R. R., McDonald, L. T., Jensen, N. R., Sidles, S. J. & LaRue, A. C. Impacts of psychological stress on osteoporosis: clinical implications and treatment interactions. Front. Psychiatry 10, 200 (2019).
Ambrosi, T. H. et al. Aged skeletal stem cells generate an inflammatory degenerative niche. Nature 597, 256–262 (2021).
Chandra, A. & Rajawat, J. Skeletal aging and osteoporosis: mechanisms and therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 3553 (2021).
Ducy, P. et al. Leptin inhibits bone formation through a hypothalamic relay: a central control of bone mass. Cell 100, 197–207 (2000).
Strotmeyer, E. S. et al. Reduced peripheral nerve function is related to lower hip BMD and calcaneal QUS in older white and black adults: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. J. Bone Min. Res. 21, 1803–1810 (2006).
Farr, J. N. et al. Relationship of sympathetic activity to bone microstructure, turnover, and plasma osteopontin levels in women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 4219–4227 (2012).
Tomlinson, R. E., Christiansen, B. A., Giannone, A. A. & Genetos, D. C. The role of nerves in skeletal development, adaptation, and aging. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 11, 646–646 (2020).
Mapp, P. I. & Walsh, D. A. Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 390–398 (2012).
Latourte, A., Kloppenburg, M. & Richette, P. Emerging pharmaceutical therapies for osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16, 673–688 (2020).
Kauther, M. D., Xu, J. & Wedemeyer, C. Alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide can reverse the catabolic influence of UHMWPE particles on RANKL expression in primary human osteoblasts. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 6, 525–536 (2010).
Lotz, E. M., Berger, M. B., Boyan, B. D. & Schwartz, Z. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation on microstructured titanium surfaces by semaphorin 3A. Bone 134, 115260 (2020).
Bely, A. E. & Nyberg, K. G. Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 161–170 (2010).
Neff, E. P. What is a lab animal? Lab Anim. (NY) 47, 223–227 (2018).
Shaw, T. J., Osborne, M., Ponte, G., Fiorito, G. & Andrews, P. L. R. Mechanisms of wound closure following acute arm injury in Octopus vulgaris. Zool. Lett. 2, 8 (2016).
Emig, C. C. L’histogenèse régénératrice chez les phoronidiens. Wilhelm. Roux’ Arch Entwickl Mech Org 173, 235–248 (1973).
Farkas, J. E. & Monaghan, J. R. A brief history of the study of nerve dependent regeneration. Neurogenesis (Austin) 4, e1302216 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr Jiankun Xu for critiquing this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 82002313, No. 82072444); the National Key Research & Development Program of China (2021YFA1101503, 2018YFC2001502 and 2018YFB1105705); the Department of Science and Technology of Hubei Province (No. 2020BCB004); the University Grants Committee, Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (14121721, 14108720, C7030-18G, T13-402/17-N and AoE/M-402/20); and the Wuhan Union Hospital “Pharmaceutical Technology nursing” special fund (No. 2019xhyn021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.T. and Y.H. retrieved data for the article. R.T., Y.H., and S.L. wrote the article. X.L., Y.X., and A.C.P. edited the manuscript. B.M., G.Li, and G.Liu revised the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tao, R., Mi, B., Hu, Y. et al. Hallmarks of peripheral nerve function in bone regeneration. Bone Res 11, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-022-00240-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-022-00240-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Sensory nerves drive migration of dental pulp stem cells via the CGRP-Ramp1 axis in pulp repair
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2024)
-
The Implications of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in the Biological Activities of Platelet-Rich Plasma
Inflammation (2024)
-
Neuro–bone tissue engineering: emerging mechanisms, potential strategies, and current challenges
Bone Research (2023)