Abstracts
Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related disease in men characterized by the growth of prostate cells and hyperproliferation of prostate tissue. This condition is closely related to chronic inflammation. In this study, we highlight the therapeutic efficacy of ellagic acid (EA) for BPH by focusing on the AR signaling axis and STAT3. To investigate the effect of EA on BPH, we used EA, a phytochemical abundant in fruits and vegetables, to treat testosterone propionate (TP)-induced BPH rats and RWPE-1 human prostate epithelial cells. The EA treatment reduced prostate weight, prostate epithelial thickness, and serum DHT levels in the TP-induced BPH rat model. In addition, EA improved testicular injury by increasing antioxidant enzymes in testis of the BPH rats. EA reduced the protein levels of AR, 5AR2, and PSA. It also induced apoptosis by regulating Bax, Bcl_xL, cytochrome c, caspase 9, and caspase 3 with increasing mitochondrial dynamics. Furthermore, EA reduced the expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and NF-κB, as well as phosphorylation of STAT3 and IκBα. These findings were also confirmed in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells. Overall, our data provide evidence of the role of EA in improving BPH through inhibition of AR and the STAT3 pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ellagic acid (EA) is a natural phenolic compound and previous studies have previously suggested the potential of EA as an alternative therapeutic agent for diseases such as obesity, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and cancer [1, 2]. Its beneficial effects are induced through the regulation of multiple pathways such as anti-inflammation, anti-oxidative, and apoptosis [1]. However, the therapeutic potential of EA against BPH has not been supported.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the condition of an enlarged prostate that is caused by accelerated proliferation of stromal and epithelial cells, but which does not induce tumor production [3]. Abnormal overgrowth of the prostate causes various histological changes, such as increased epithelial thickness and penetration of epithelial tissue into the lumen region, leading to urinary diseases such as lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), acute urinary retention (AUR), and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) [4]. Most BPH patients are >50 years of age and are known to have lower quality of life due to BPH-induced symptoms such as urinary intermittency, incomplete emptying, weak stream, staining, urgency, and nocturia [5].
The pathological cause of BPH is an imbalance between testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which is a critical factor in the pathologic diagnosis of BPH [6]. Testosterone, a major androgen that plays an important role in development of the male reproductive system [7], is converted to DHT by action of type 1 or type 2 5α-reductase. The DHT activates androgen receptor (AR)-mediated prostate cell proliferation and consequentially causes prostate overgrowth [8]. In addition to hormonal imbalance, inflammation is also the pathological cause of BPH [6]. The prostate of a BPH patient shows extensive inflammation, especially pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin (IL)−6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Moreover, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer from activated B cells (NF-kB) increased in the prostate tissue of BPH patients [9, 10].
The pharmacological treatment of BPH has been focused on reducing symptoms and prostatic growth using agents of α−1 adrenergic receptor antagonists (α1-blockers) and 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) [11]. Finasteride is one of the most prescribed drugs to treat BPH and blocks testosterone from converting to DHT by inhibiting type 2 5α-reductase activity [12]. However, long-term treatment with finasteride has been reported to have numerous adverse effects, including erectile dysfunction, depression, or loss of libido [13]. Furthermore, accumulated evidence suggests that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might have a beneficial effect on the development and progression of BPH in experimental BPH models, but proof of the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of BPH requires further clinical study [14].
Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the effect and the underlying mechanisms of EA on BPH development using testosterone propionate (TP)-induced BPH rats and RWPE-1 human prostate epithelial cell lines.
Results
EA reduces androgen-mediated prostate hyperplasia in a TP-induced BPH rat model
The chemical structure of EA is shown in Fig. 1A. As shown in Fig. 1B, the difference in body weight between TP injection groups was not significant. The prostate in the TP group increased 3.5-fold over that in the vehicle group. In contrast, groups of rats treated with EA or Fi showed a reduction of prostate weight (Fig. 1C). Prostate index (PI) used to express the mass of the prostate relative to body weight was calculated using the prostate mass (mg)/body weight (100 g). The PI showed similar results to prostate tissue weight (Fig. 1D). To observe the histological changes of the prostate, prostates were stained with hematoxylin and eosin dye (Fig. 1E). The thickness of the prostate epithelial tissue in the EA or Fi treatment group was significantly reduced compared to the TP treatment group (Fig. 1F).
The serum DHT from TP-injected rats was increased 2.4-fold over the vehicle group. However, the serum DHT in groups of rats treated with EA or Fi decreased respectively (Fig. 1G). We then examined the protein levels of AR, 5AR2, and IL-6 in the prostate. The expression of AR was detected in the prostates by Immunofluorescence staining. As a result, the groups of rats treated with EA or Fi showed decreased AR expression in the prostate compared to the groups of rats treated with TP (Fig. 1H). The protein levels of AR, 5AR2, and IL-6 in the prostate were significantly reduced in the groups of rats treated with EA or Fi, compared to the groups of rats treated with TP (Fig. 1I). In addition, to investigate the effect of EA on liver and kidney injuries, we confirmed the levels of ALT, AST, creatinine, and BUN in the serum of the rats, and the results were expressed in Supplementary Fig. 1A, B.
EA regulates androgen-mediated proliferation through AR signaling axis in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells
To establish an in vitro experimental model of BPH, we used RWPE-1 cells. We treated with various concentrations of TP (0.5–8.0 μM) to investigate how TP treatment affects cell proliferation by RWPE-1 cells. The cell proliferation increased after 4.0 μM of TP treatment (Fig. 1J). We further investigated whether treatment with 1.0–4.0 μM of TP affects protein levels of AR in RWPE-1 cells. The TP (4.0 μM) increased AR levels compared to PBS-treated cells (Fig. 1K). Therefore, the following experiments were conducted at a TP concentration of 4.0 μM.
Because EA showed no cytotoxicity at concentrations of <12.5 μM (Fig. 1L), we investigated whether EA (3.1–12.5 μM) could inhibit proliferation in RWPE-1 cells. Fi (25 μM) was used as a positive control. An increased cell proliferation of RWPE-1 cells by TP was significantly reduced by the treatment of EA or Fi (Fig. 1M). EA (12.5 μM) or Fi treatment substantially reduced the mRNA expression of AR and 5AR in the AR signaling pathway (Fig. 1N). Furthermore, EA or Fi treatment reduced the protein levels of androgen-mediated growth factors (AR, 5AR, and PSA) in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 1O). Cytological expression of AR (green dye) was decreased by EA or Fi treatment of TP-treated RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 1P).
EA restores testicular injury by increasing catalase activity and decreasing MDA level in a TP-induced BPH rat model
Interestingly, we found that the testis weight was reduced in the TP-induced BPH rats, and in contrast to the Fi group, the testis weight was restored in the EA group (Fig. 2A). To investigate the protective effect of EA on testis weight loss in the TP-induced BPH rats, we confirmed apoptosis and proliferation markers in the testis. As shown in Fig. 2B, C, the decreased PCNA protein level in the testis of BPH rats was restored to normal level by EA treatment. In contrast, cleaved-caspase 3/caspase 3 ratio were increased by Fi treatment in the testis, but EA did not affect the marker. Because oxidative stress is one of the major factors in tissue injury [15], we also verified the lipid peroxidation process-related factors: antioxidant enzymes (catalase and SOD1) and an end product of the lipid peroxidation process (malondialdehyde, MDA), in the testis. The MDA level of the testis in the TP group was significantly increased compared to the vehicle group. However, the increased MDA level in the testis was reduced by EA treatment (Fig. 2D). In contrast to the Fi group, the protein levels of catalase and SOD1 in the testis of the EA group were higher than for the TP group (Fig. 2E–G). Furthermore, to investigate the effect of EA on sperm, we measured the number of sperm in the epididymis of each group. No difference was observed between the TP and EA groups. However, Fi treatment decreased the sperm count (Fig. 2H).
EA increases mitochondrial dynamics and induces apoptosis in a TP-induced BPH rat model and TP-treated RWPE-1 cells
The apoptotic system is known to be promoted by mitochondrial dysfunction associated with mitochondrial dynamics as well as cell cycle arrest, Bcl-2 family proteins, and OXPHOS complexes [16]. We also investigated whether EA regulates the expressions of apoptosis-related factors (Bcl-2-associated X protein: Bax, B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xL), cytochrome c, caspase 9, and caspase 3), and OXPHOS complexes (ATP5A, UQCRC2, MTCO1, and SDHB), as well as mitochondrial dynamics-related factors (DRP1 and MFN1) in the TP-treated BPH rats. EA treatment increased the protein levels of DRP1 and MFN1 in the prostate of TP-treated BPH rats while the levels of ATP5A, MTCO, and SDHB were decreased by EA in the tissue (Fig. 3A, B). In addition, as shown in Fig. 3C, D, EA or Fi treatment elevated the ratios of Bax/Bcl-xL, cleaved-caspase 9/pro-caspase 9, cleaved-caspase 3/pro-caspase 3, and cleaved-PARP/total-PARP as well as cytochrome c in the prostate. Furthermore, EA or Fi treatment significantly decreased the levels of cyclin B1 and PCNA in the prostate (Fig. 3E). These were confirmed in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 4A–D).
Next, to investigate whether the expressions of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) were affected by EA treatment, we treated with EA (6.3 and 12.5 μM), and analyzed the mRNA expression of Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, CDK6, and CDK4 in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 4E). The treatment of EA down-regulated the mRNA expressions of cyclins and CDKs and the protein levels of cyclin B1 compared to TP treatment (Fig. 4F). From cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry, we confirmed that the ratio of G0/G1 phase-located cells in the population of the cell cycle (G0/G1, S, and G2/M) was increased by EA or Fi treatment (Fig. 4G). Furthermore, EA as well as Fi decreased the protein expression of Ki67 in the TP-treated RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 4H).
EA reduces STAT3/NF-kB signaling axis in a TP-induced BPH rat model and RWPE-1 cells
The phosphorylated STAT3 and NF-κB levels were increased by TP treatment in the prostate. EA or Fi treatment reduced the levels of these proteins (Fig. 5A). Next, we conducted immunofluorescence staining and confirmed that the green fluorescence intensity of phospho-STAT3 was extensively detected in the prostate epithelial region isolated by actin staining. However, the expression of phospho-STAT3 in the EA or Fi treated group was decreased to a level similar to that of the vehicle group (Fig. 5B).
The exposure of RWPE-1 cells to TP increased the mRNA expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α), but its expression was decreased by EA or Fi treatment (Fig. 5C). Next, to investigate how EA affects the STAT3/NF-κB signaling axis, we confirmed the protein levels of STAT3, NF-κB, and p-nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cell inhibitor alpha (p-IκBα) using immunofluorescence staining and Western blot in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells. The TP treatment greatly increased protein levels of p-STAT3, NF-κB, and p-IκBα compared to those in PBS-treated RWPE-1 cells. As expected, EA regulated the STAT3/NF-κB signaling axis by reducing pSTAT3, NF-κB, and p-IκBα levels. (Fig. 5D–F).
EA alleviates androgen-mediated prostate hyperplasia through inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation
Because we found that EA inhibits the p-STAT3 level while TP treatment increases the STAT3 phosphorylation, we next confirmed whether the inhibition of STAT3 alleviates the proliferation of TP-treated RWPE-1 cells. As shown in Fig. 6A–C, Stattic, a potent STAT3 inhibitor, does not affect the viability of RWPE-1 cells at concentrations of <2.0 μM, and effectively reduces cell proliferation and STAT3 phosphorylation in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells. To investigate whether the inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation also affects the AR signaling axis, we dosed TP-treated RWPE-1 cells with Stattic or EA and confirmed the protein levels of AR, 5AR2, and PSA using Western blot. The protein levels of AR, 5AR, and PSA in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells were reduced by Stattic or EA treatment (Fig. 6D, E). Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining showed that Stattic downregulates the AR expression in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 6F).
Discussion
During the process of BPH development, an imbalance between testosterone and DHT is a major pathophysiological factor in prostate remodeling [17]. DHT initiates AR signaling pathways through a combination with AR in androgen binding sites [18]. Molecules of a DHT/AR complex move into a nucleus and then bind to the ARE present in the promoters of target genes leading growth and survival of prostate epithelial cells [19]. Next, they trigger the proliferation of prostate cells by activation of cell cycle progression and increase PSA expression levels in the cells [20]. Increased expressions of AR, 5AR2, and PSA correlate with prostate hyperplasia, and these markers are increased markedly in patients and in animal models with BPH [21, 22]. The experimental BPH animal models induced by chronic injection of TP have been widely used to confirm etiological and pathophysiological evidence as well as pharmacological evidence for BPH [23, 24]. The present study used the TP-induced BPH rat model to investigate the therapeutic effect of EA and we found that EA significantly reduced the prostate size, epithelial thickness, serum DHT levels, and the protein levels of AR, 5AR2, and PSA in the TP-induced BPH rat model.
In a normal prostate, a balance between apoptosis and proliferation of cells is achieved to control excessive proliferation of prostate epithelial cells, while microenvironmental changes such as increasing DHT levels lead to excessive proliferation due to suppression of cell death, causing prostate hyperplasia [6]. Therefore, previous studies have confirmed whether candidates for BPH treatment, in addition to the hormonal factors, play a role in regulating Bcl-2 family proteins and caspases [25]. In the present study, EA treatment significantly induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis as well as inhibits DHT/AR signaling pathways in TP-induced BPH rats and TP-treated RWPE-1 cells.
BPH is an age-related disease characterized by the growth of epithelial and stromal cells, but also includes a microenvironment of chronic inflammation [26]. The inflammatory sign can be induced not only by viral or bacterial antigens but also metabolic disorders such as hormone imbalance. The cause of prostate chronic inflammation during prostate hyperplasia is still unclear, but it has been confirmed that inflammatory cells such as T lymphocytes and macrophages infiltrate the prostates of BPH patients [27]. Emerging data have shown that pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and IL-8 secreted by these inflammatory cells, selectively promote the proliferation of prostate epithelial cells [26, 28]. Other studies have confirmed that epithelial and stromal cells, as well as infiltrated immune cells, have cytokine receptors on their membrane surface and can participate in local prostate inflammatory microenvironments [29]. Our findings showed that TP increased pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-6 and TNF-α in prostate tissue and RWPE-1 prostate epithelial cells. Moreover, EA significantly reduced the expression of IL-6 and TNF-α through inhibition of the STAT3/NF-kB signaling axis in the prostate of BPH rats and TP-treated RWPE-1 cells.
STAT3 and NF-kB act as major transcription factors in many cellular processes, such as cell growth, apoptosis, and inflammation [30]. The activation of these factors is induced by pro-inflammatory mediators, in particular IL-6, and is known to promote prostate carcinogenesis as well as the development and progression of BPH [31]. The increased IL-6 expression by activation of ikBα and NF-kB in the BPH microenvironment leads to phosphorylation of STAT3 [32]. The phosphorylated STAT3 undergoes a process of dimerization for stabilization and moves to the nucleus. Then, it initiates transcription of pro-inflammatory genes such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-8 [33]. The released pro-inflammatory molecules might aggravate the BPH by inflammation reaction via autocrine/paracrine systems [34]. Therefore, inhibition of phosphorylation of STAT3 is expected to play a role as a negative regulator in the development and progression of BPH [35]. Although further investigation is required for the detailed roles of STAT3 in the mechanics of either BPH development or progression, Stattic, a potent inhibitor of STAT3, as well as EA markedly reduced not only cell proliferation but also the protein levels of AR, 5AR2, and PSA in TP-treated RWPE-1 cells.
In conclusion, EA improves androgen-mediated prostate hyperplasia induced by AR signaling and STAT3 activation in the TP-induced BPH animal and cell models. These findings advance understanding of the pharmacological role of EA in the treatment of BPH.
Experimental procedures
Chemical reagents
EA (PubChem CID: 5281855) was purchased from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA) and dissolved in distilled water (DW). Testosterone propionate (TP, PubChem CID: 5995) was provided from Wako pure chemical industries (Osaka, Japan), and finasteride (≥ 98% pure, PubChem CID: 57363) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Japan). The antibodies used in this study were shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Animal experiments
Six-week-old male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from the Dae-Han Experimental Animal Center (Dae-Han Biolink, Eumsung, Korea) and kept for 1 week prior to the experiments. The animals were all maintained under conditions in accordance with the regulation issued by the Institutional Review Board of Kyung Hee University (confirmation number KHUASP(SE)-19-406).
BPH was induced by subcutaneous injection of TP (5 mg/kg) dissolved in corn oil containing 5% ethanol for 8 weeks, as described previously [36]. In detail, the rats (n = 24) were randomly divided into two groups, either the vehicle group (n = 6) that were subcutaneously injected with corn oil containing 5% ethanol, or the TP group (n = 18) that were subcutaneously injected with TP. Next, after 4 weeks of injection, the rats of the TP group were randomly divided into three groups (n = 6 per group). Group A included members of the TP group that were subcutaneously injected with TP. Group B included members of the TP + EA group that were subcutaneously injected with EA (20 mg/kg) and TP. Group C included members of the TP + finasteride (TP + Fi) group, a positive control group, into which Fi (1 mg/kg) and TP were subcutaneously injected. All groups were supplemented daily in the inguinal region of the rats. After 4 weeks, the rats (n = 24) were sacrificed by cervical dislocation under CO2 asphyxiation. All analyses were conducted in investigator blinded fashion.
Hematoxylin and eosin staining
Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining was performed as previously reported [37]. Microscopic examinations were performed, and photographs were taken under a regular light microscope. The prostate epithelial thickness was calculated using the ImageJ software program (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Cell culture
RWPE-1, a normal human prostate epithelial cell line, was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, United States). The cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin, and streptomycin in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Cell viability assay
To measure cell viability, we used the WST-1 assay. The WST-1 assay was performed as previously reported [37]. The absorbance was measured using a VERSAmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, United States) at 450 nm.
Western blot analysis
Protein expression analysis was performed as previously reported [37]. The membranes were blocked in 5% skim milk and incubated with the respective primary antibody (1:1000) overnight at 4 °C after incubation with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:10000) for 1 h at room temperature. The proteins were visualized using the ECL advance kit.
Immunofluorescence assay
An immunofluorescence assay was performed as previously reported [38]. The fluorescence was detected using an EVOS Cell Imaging System (Thermo Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
MDA measurement
MDA contents were detected using the EZ-lipid peroxidation (TBARS) assay kit (DoGen Bio, Seoul, Korea). These levels were confirmed based on the manufacturer’s instructions.
Catalase activity measurement
Catalase activity was detected using the EZ-catalase assay kit (DoGen Bio, Seoul, Korea). These levels were confirmed based on the manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA isolation and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR were performed as previously described [38]. The relative gene expressions were calculated based on the comparative CT method using StepOne software v2.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an endogenous control. The primers used in this study were shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry
RWPE-1 cells were seeded at a density of 8 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates. After 12 h, the cells were exposed to TP (4 μM) for 1 h. Then, they were treated with EA (12.5 and 25.0 μM) or Fi (25 μM) for 24 h. The cells were washed in 1% FBS in phosphate buffered-saline (PBS) and fixed using 500 μL of 70% ethanol overnight at −20 °C. After washing, the cell pellet was left in PI staining solution at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. The stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± SEM of independent experiments. Statistical differences were evaluated using the Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA, and a subsequent post-hoc test via Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Values of *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Derosa G, Maffioli P, Sahebkar A. Ellagic acid and its role in chronic diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;7:473–9.
Kang I, Buckner T, Shay NF, Gu L, Chung S. Improvements in metabolic health with consumption of ellagic acid and subsequent conversion into urolithins: evidence and mechanisms. Adv Nutr. 2016;7:961–72.
Zhang B, Kwon O-J, Henry G, Malewska A, Wei X, Zhang L, et al. Non-cell-autonomous regulation of prostate epithelial homeostasis by androgen receptor. Mol Cell. 2016;63:976–89.
Sathianathen NJ, Hwang EC, Brown SJ, Borofsky M, Dahm P. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:CD013291.
McVary KT. Clinical evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2003;5:S3–11.
Nicholson TM, Ricke WA. Androgens and estrogens in benign prostatic hyperplasia: past, present and future. Differentiation. 2011;82:184–99.
Thomson AA. Role of androgens and fibroblast growth factors in prostatic development. Reproduction. 2001;121:187–95.
Mohler JL, Titus MA, Bai S, Kennerley BJ, Lih FB, Tomer KB, et al. Activation of the androgen receptor by intratumoral bioconversion of androstanediol to dihydrotestosterone in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1486–96.
Tong Y, Zhou R-Y. Review of the roles and interaction of androgen and inflammation in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Mediators Inflamm. 2020;28:7958316.
Vickman RE, Franco OE, Moline DC, Vander Griend DJ, Thumbikat P, Hayward SW. The role of the androgen receptor in prostate development and benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review. Asian J Urol. 2019;7:191–202.
Tarter T, Vaughan E Jr. Inhibitors of 5α-reductase in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12:775–83.
Anitha B, Inamadar AC, Ragunatha S. Finasteride-its impact on sexual function and prostate cancer. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2009;2:12–6.
Ganzer CA, Jacobs AR, Iqbal F. Persistent sexual, emotional, and cognitive impairment post-finasteride: a survey of men reporting symptoms. Am J Mens Health. 2015;9:222–8.
Ishiguro H, Kawahara T. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and prostatic diseases. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:436123.
Mittal M, Siddiqui MR, Tran K, Reddy SP, Malik AB. Reactive oxygen species in inflammation and tissue injury. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20:1126–67.
Alabsi AM, Lim KL, Paterson IC, Ali-Saeed R, Muharram BA. Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction via modulation of mitochondrial integrity by Bcl-2 family members and caspase dependence in Dracaena cinnabari-treated H400 human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4904016.
Carson C III, Rittmaster R. The role of dihydrotestosterone in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2003;61:2–7.
Davey RA, Grossmann M. Androgen receptor structure, function and biology: from bench to bedside. Clin Biochem Rev. 2016;37:3–15.
Tan M, Li J, Xu HE, Melcher K, Yong E-L. Androgen receptor: structure, role in prostate cancer and drug discovery. Acta Pharm Sin. 2015;36:3–23.
Kim T-H, Park J-M, Kim M-Y, Ahn Y-H. The role of CREB3L4 in the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–11.
Afriansyah A, Gani YI, Nusali H. Comparison between visual prostate symptom score and international prostate symptom score in males older than 40 years in rural Indonesia. Prostate Int. 2014;2:176–81.
Banerjee PP, Banerjee S, Brown TR, Zirkin BR. Androgen action in prostate function and disease. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2018;6:62.
Kim KS, Yang HY, Chang SC, Kim YM, Lee KY, Lee BM, et al. Potential repositioning of GV1001 as a therapeutic agent for testosterone‑induced benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Mol Med. 2018;42:2260–8.
La Vignera S, Condorelli R, Russo G, Morgia G, Calogero A. Endocrine control of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Andrology. 2016;4:404–11.
Hata AN, Engelman JA, Faber AC. The BCL2 family: key mediators of the apoptotic response to targeted anticancer therapeutics. Cancer Disco. 2015;5:475–87.
Chughtai B, Lee R, Te A, Kaplan S. Role of inflammation in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2011;13:147.
Krušlin B, Tomas D, Džombeta T, Milković-Periša M, Ulamec M. Inflammation in prostatic hyperplasia and carcinoma—basic scientific approach. Front Oncol. 2017;7:77.
Han I-H, Song H-O, Ryu J-S. IL-6 produced by prostate epithelial cells stimulated with Trichomonas vaginalis promotes proliferation of prostate cancer cells by inducing M2 polarization of THP-1-derived macrophages. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008126.
Cai T, Santi R, Tamanini I, Galli IC, Perletti G, Bjerklund Johansen TE, et al. Current knowledge of the potential links between inflammation and prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3833.
Ji Z, He L, Regev A, Struhl K. Inflammatory regulatory network mediated by the joint action of NF-kB, STAT3, and AP-1 factors is involved in many human cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:9453–62.
Nguyen DP, Li J, Tewari AK. Inflammation and prostate cancer: the role of interleukin 6 (IL‐6). BJU int. 2014;113:986–92.
Kim S-S, Kim J-H, Han I-H, Ahn M-H, Ryu J-S. Inflammatory responses in a benign prostatic hyperplasia epithelial cell line (BPH-1) infected with Trichomonas vaginalis. Korean J Parasitol. 2016;54:123.
Xiong A, Yang Z, Shen Y, Zhou J, Shen Q. Transcription factor STAT3 as a novel molecular target for cancer prevention. Cancers (Basel). 2014;6:926–57.
Fibbi B, Penna G, Morelli A, Adorini L, Maggi M. Chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Androl. 2010;33:475–88.
Elkahwaji JE. The role of inflammatory mediators in the development of prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Res Rep Urol. 2013;5:1.
Choi H-M, Jung Y, Park J, Kim H-L, Youn D-H, Kang J, et al. Cinnamomi cortex (Cinnamomum verum) suppresses testosterone-induced benign prostatic hyperplasia by regulating 5α-reductase. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31906.
Youn D-H, Park J, Kim H-L, Jung Y, Kang J, Lim S, et al. Berberine improves benign prostatic hyperplasia via suppression of 5 alpha reductase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in vivo and in vitro. Front Pharm. 2018;9:773.
Park WY, Choe S-K, Park J, Um J-Y. Black raspberry (Rubus coreanus Miquel) promotes browning of preadipocytes and inguinal white adipose tissue in cold-induced mice. Nutrients 2019;11:2164.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1A2A3075684, 2021R1A2C2010460 and 2022R1I1A1A01053716), funded by the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and design: WYP and J-YU, experiments and data analysis: WYP, GS, JYP, JP, JHL, KSA, HJK, and J-YU, funding acquisition: J-YU, manuscript writing, review, and editing: WYP, and J-YU. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Professor Boris Zhivotovsky
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, W.Y., Song, G., Park, J.Y. et al. Ellagic acid improves benign prostate hyperplasia by regulating androgen signaling and STAT3. Cell Death Dis 13, 554 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04995-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04995-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Omentin-1 inhibits the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia by attenuating local inflammation
Molecular Medicine (2024)
-
Integrating spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals the alterations in epithelial cells during nodular formation in benign prostatic hyperplasia
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
Xiaoyankangjun tablet alleviates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice by regulating gut microbiota and JAK2/STAT3 pathway
Natural Products and Bioprospecting (2024)
-
Ellagic Acid Displays a Protective Effect on Red Blood Cell Membrane During Aging in Humans
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry (2024)
-
Shuangshi Tonglin Capsule treats benign prostatic hyperplasia through the ROS/NLRP3 signaling pathway
International Urology and Nephrology (2023)