Abstract
Recent evidence has indicated that circular RNAs (circRNAs), a novel type of regulatory RNA, play important roles in the development and progression of various cancers. However, the potential regulatory roles and molecular mechanisms of circRNAs in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain largely unclear. Here, we explored circRNA expression profiles in 10 paired samples of RCC (including cancer tissues and surrounding tissues) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets GSE124453 and GSE108735. We initially identified hsa_circ_0086457, designated circPLIN2, derived from exons 4 to 5 of the PLIN2 gene. We observed that circPLIN2 was preferentially located in the cytoplasm and was more stable than its linear counterpart PLIN2. circPLIN2 was significantly upregulated in ccRCC cells and tissues, and its overexpression was correlated with higher clinical stage and worse prognosis for ccRCC patients. Moreover, gain- and loss-of-function assays indicated that circPLIN2 promoted ccRCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and ccRCC tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, circPLIN2 not only increased the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs by binding to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins but also competitively sponged miR-199a-3p to abolish the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression, which ultimately resulted in ccRCC tumorigenesis and progression. Collectively, our results suggest that circPLIN2 may represent a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for ccRCC patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in humans, and its high morbidity and mortality rates, with 73,750 new cases and 14,830 deaths estimated in 2020 in the US, make it a growing global health problem [1]. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common type of RCC, accounting for approximately 70–75% of RCC cases [2]. Currently, the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of ccRCC patients is the early detection of microtumor lesions and radical surgical resection of localized ccRCC, which generally result in excellent long-term disease-free survival (DFS) [3, 4]. However, the prognosis of patients with advanced ccRCC is poor due to local tumor recurrence or distant metastasis, even after radical nephrectomy [5]. In addition, the majority of ccRCCs are resistant to both traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy once they recur or metastasize, leading to shorter overall survival for patients with advanced ccRCC [6, 7]. Therefore, studies elucidating the potential mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of ccRCC and identifying new effective therapeutic approaches for ccRCC are urgently needed.
Recently, circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been characterized as covalently closed loop structures without a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail that are formed by back-splicing events and have attracted the attention of many researchers [8,9,10]. circRNAs are widely expressed in a variety of eukaryotes and have greater stability and a stronger resistance to digestion by RNase R treatment than their linear counterpart mRNAs [8,9,10]. In addition, circRNAs have many important regulatory functions. For instance, circRNAs function as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to sponge miRNAs to regulate the expression of downstream genes [11,12,13,14] and interact with RNA-binding proteins to regulate protein functions [15,16,17,18,19,20]. In recent years, accumulating evidence has shown that circRNAs encode functional microproteins by the cap-independent translation pathway [21,22,23] or m6A (N6-methyladenosine) modification [24,25,26]. circRNAs, a novel type of regulatory RNA molecule, play important roles in the development and progression of various cancers [27,28,29,30,31]. Meanwhile, the conserved, stable, and specific spatiotemporal characteristics of circRNAs make them excellent biomarkers for tumor diagnosis and prognosis and potential therapeutic targets for malignant tumors [32,33,34]. However, to date, the key regulatory roles and underlying molecular mechanisms of circRNAs in the development and progression of ccRCC remain largely unclear.
In this study, we investigated circRNA expression profiles in 10 paired samples of RCC (including cancer tissues and surrounding tissues) from the GEO datasets GSE124453 and GSE108735. We initially identified hsa_circ_0086457, termed circPLIN2, derived from exons 4 to 5 of the PLIN2 gene. circPLIN2 was preferentially located in the cytoplasm and was more stable than its linear transcript PLIN2. circPLIN2 was markedly upregulated in ccRCC cells and tissues, and its overexpression was correlated with higher clinical stage and worse prognosis for ccRCC patients. Gain- and loss-of-function assays indicated that circPLIN2 promoted ccRCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and ccRCC tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, circPLIN2 not only increased the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs by binding to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins but also competitively sponged miR-199a-3p to abolish the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression, which ultimately resulted in ccRCC tumorigenesis and progression.
Results
Identification and characteristics of circPLIN2 in ccRCC
We first analyzed the expression profiles of circRNAs in human ccRCC to explore the regulatory roles of circRNAs and their underlying molecular mechanisms in the development and progression of human ccRCC. We performed a joint analysis of the circRNA expression data for 10 paired samples of RCC (including cancer tissues and surrounding tissues) from the GEO datasets GSE124453 and GSE108735 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Table 1). A total of 12,299 circRNAs were identified (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Table 2). Among all circRNAs, 243 were identified as differentially expressed circRNAs between RCC and normal tissues, including 186 downregulated circRNAs and 57 upregulated circRNAs in RCC (Fig. 1C and Supplementary Table 2). We found that hsa_circ_0086457, designated circPLIN2, was significantly upregulated in RCC samples (Fig. 1C).
circPLIN2 is a circular RNA molecule derived from exons 4 to 5 of the PLIN2 gene on human chromosome 9 (9p22.1) with a length of 369 nucleotides (Fig. 1D). The back-splice junction of circPLIN2 was amplified using divergent primers and confirmed by Sanger sequencing, and the result was consistent with the circBase database annotation (http://www.circbase.org) (Fig. 1D). Subsequently, PCR amplification and agarose gel electrophoresis using divergent and convergent primers further revealed that circPLIN2 was amplified from cDNA templates but not gDNA templates compared to PLIN2 and GAPDH (Fig. 1E), consistent with the general characteristics of circRNAs. We next investigated the resistance of circPLIN2 to RNase R digestion, and the results indicated that circPLIN2 was more tolerant to RNase R digestion than its linear counterpart PLIN2 (Fig. 1F). In addition, actinomycin D, an inhibitor of transcription, was applied to determine the half-life of circPLIN2 in ccRCC cells, and the content of circPLIN2 decreased slowly over time compared with the linear PLIN2 transcript in 786-O cells cultured in the presence of 2 μg/mL actinomycin D, suggesting that circPLIN2 was more stable or had a longer half-life than its linear counterpart PLIN2 (Fig. 1G). We performed RT–qPCR analysis to determine the abundance of nuclear and cytoplasmic circPLIN2 in ccRCC cells. Notably, circPLIN2 was preferentially located in the cytoplasm of ACHN (Fig. 1H) and OS-RC-2 (Fig. 1I) cells, consistent with the results of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays (Fig. 1J, K). Overall, circPLIN2, the back-spliced product of the parent gene PLIN2, was preferentially distributed in the cytoplasm of ccRCC cells and had a longer half-life and a stronger resistance to RNase R digestion than its linear counterpart PLIN2.
circPLIN2 is significantly upregulated in ccRCC and correlates with disease progression and the poor prognosis of ccRCC patients
Furthermore, in situ hybridization staining was performed on a tissue microarray of human ccRCC, including 90 cases of tumor tissues and adjacent tissues, with probes specific for circPLIN2 to validate its expression. Three representative cases of in situ hybridization staining for circPLIN2 expression in the tissue microarray were shown (Fig. 2A). We found that circPLIN2 was significantly upregulated in ccRCC tissues compared with surrounding normal tissues (Fig. 2B, left panel), accounting for approximately 63% (57/90) of 90 ccRCC specimens (Fig. 2B, right panel). To further examine circPLIN2 overexpression in ccRCC, we used a panel of four human ccRCC cell lines (786-O, ACHN, 769-P, and OS-RC-2 cells) and HK-2 cells (a proximal tubule epithelial cell line) to test circPLIN2 expression by RT–qPCR. The results showed that circPLIN2 was observably overexpressed in ccRCC cells compared to HK-2 cells (Fig. 2C), consistent with the results of in situ hybridization staining assays (Fig. 2A, B).
Furthermore, substantially higher circPLIN2 levels were detected in ccRCC tissues with advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages (AJCC stage 3–4) than in ccRCC tissues with early AJCC stages (AJCC stage 1–2) (Fig. 2D). In addition, we analyzed the correlation between circPLIN2 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in 90 ccRCC patients. The results showed that circPLIN2 expression was only significantly correlated with tumor differentiation, and the higher the expression level of circPLIN2, the worse the tumor differentiation and the higher the malignant grade of the tumor (Table 1). The survival curve analysis showed that ccRCC patients with high circPLIN2 expression had a markedly lower overall survival rate than ccRCC patients with low circPLIN2 expression (Fig. 2E). Moreover, the univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that the differential expression of circPLIN2 was significantly correlated with the overall survival in 78 ccRCC patients (P = 0.026) (Table 2), consistent with the results of the Kaplan–Meier analysis (Fig. 2E). However, the multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that the differential expression of circPLIN2 was not associated with the overall survival in 78 ccRCC patients (P = 0.206) (Table 2), which may be explained by the small number of patients involved or the presence of some factors that interfered with the true results. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that circPLIN2 expression showed excellent diagnostic performance for cancer and paracancer (Fig. 2F), AJCC stage 1–2 and stage 3–4 (Fig. 2G), and the survival and death of ccRCC patients (Fig. 2H). Collectively, these results suggested that circPLIN2 was significantly upregulated in ccRCC cells and tissues and that its overexpression was correlated with higher clinical stage and worse prognosis for ccRCC patients.
circPLIN2 promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ccRCC cells in vitro
To investigate whether changes in the expression of circPLIN2 affected the biological behaviors of ccRCC cells, two small interfering RNAs (circPLIN2-siRNA 1 and circPLIN2-siRNA 2) were designed and synthesized specifically targeting the back-splice junction of circPLIN2, and a circPLIN2 overexpression vector was designed and constructed. The results of RT–qPCR assays showed that these two siRNAs specifically knocked down circPLIN2 expression in ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells but had no effect on PLIN2 mRNA expression (Fig. 3A). Similarly, circPLIN2 was successfully overexpressed in ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells, while PLIN2 mRNA expression showed no obvious change (Fig. 3B). Then, we detected the effects of circPLIN2 knockdown and overexpression on the proliferation of ccRCC cells. The results of the CCK-8 assays showed that circPLIN2 knockdown significantly inhibited the proliferation of ACHN, OS-RC-2, 786-O, and 769-P cells (Fig. 3C), while circPLIN2 overexpression substantially promoted the proliferation of ACHN, OS-RC-2, 786-O and 769-P cells (Fig. 3D). Similar results were obtained in the colony formation assays. Knockdown of circPLIN2 markedly impaired the ability of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells to form colonies (Fig. 3E), while overexpression of circPLIN2 notably enhanced the colony formation ability of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells (Fig. 3F). Furthermore, wound-healing assays indicated that circPLIN2 knockdown significantly suppressed the migration of ACHN (Fig. 3G) and OS-RC-2 (Fig. 3H) cells, while circPLIN2 overexpression significantly enhanced the migration of ACHN (Fig. 3I) and OS-RC-2 (Fig. 3J) cells. In addition, Matrigel-coated Transwell assays showed that circPLIN2 knockdown obviously attenuated the invasion of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells (Fig. 3K), and the opposite results were observed when circPLIN2 was overexpressed in ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells (Fig. 3L). Taken together, circPLIN2 significantly promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ccRCC cells in vitro.
circPLIN2 regulates the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs by binding to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins
CircRNAs have been shown to interact with RNA-binding proteins to regulate protein functions [15,16,17,18,19,20]. As circPLIN2 was mainly distributed in the cytoplasm, RNA pull-down assays (tagged RNA affinity purification assays) were performed to identify the proteins that bound to circPLIN2 in the cytoplasm, and then purified proteins were subjected to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and western blot analyses (Fig. 4A). To make the results of LC–MS more reliable, we repeated the LC–MS analysis and used a stricter screening standard (unique peptide≥2) to analyze the results of the two LC–MS experiments, and 12 proteins bound to circPLIN2 were screened (Fig. 4B, C and Supplementary Table 3). In addition, purified proteins obtained from RNA pull-down assays were subjected to separation on SDS–PAGE gels and subsequent silver staining, and the results were shown in Fig. 4D. Notably, there were three specific silver-stained bands at approximately 70 kD appearing in the MS2-circPLIN2 lane compared to the control MS2-Vector lane (Fig. 4D). Combined with the molecular weight and intracellular localization of the proteins (Supplementary Table 3), we speculated that these three specific silver-stained bands may be the IGF2BP1, IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 proteins. Accordingly, we performed western blot assays for the purified proteins obtained from RNA pull-down assays to detect the IGF2BP1, IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 proteins. The results indicated that circPLIN2 interacted with IGF2BP proteins (Fig. 4E and Supplementary Fig. 1A), consistent with the results of the RNA immunoprecipitation assays (Fig. 4F and Supplementary Fig. 2A, B).
Intriguingly, IGF2BP proteins can enhance the mRNA stability of downstream genes [35]. Therefore, we considered whether the interaction between circPLIN2 and IGF2BP proteins affected the mRNA stability of downstream genes of IGF2BP proteins, such as FSCN1, TK1, c-Myc, and MARCKSL1 [35]. RT–qPCR assays showed that circPLIN2 knockdown significantly reduced the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNA levels but had no effect on the FSCN1 and TK1 mRNA levels (Fig. 4G, H). Similarly, circPLIN2 overexpression drastically increased the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNA levels, while the FSCN1 and TK1 mRNA levels did not change significantly (Fig. 4I, J). Furthermore, rescue assays showed that circPLIN2 knockdown markedly reduced the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNA levels that were increased by overexpressing IGF2BP proteins (Fig. 4K and Supplementary Fig. 3A), whereas circPLIN2 overexpression obviously increased the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNA levels that were reduced by the knockdown of IGF2BP proteins (Fig. 4L and Supplementary Fig. 3B), suggesting that knockdown or overexpression of circPLIN2 apparently reversed the increases in the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs induced by overexpression of IGF2BP proteins or decreases induced by knockdown of IGF2BP proteins. Intriguingly, neither knockdown nor overexpression of IGF2BP proteins altered the expression of circPLIN2 (Supplementary Fig. 4A–D), suggesting that the changes in IGF2BP protein expression may have no effect on the function of circPLIN2, as determined by changes in its expression. Based on these data, the binding of circPLIN2 to IGF2BP proteins increased the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs.
We constructed GFP-tagged wild-type and truncated IGF2BP plasmids to further investigate the specific circPLIN2-binding domains of IGF2BP proteins (Fig. 4M). IGF2BP proteins have six key domains, including RRM1-2 domains and KH1-4 domains, and RNA immunoprecipitation assays showed that the enrichment of circPLIN2 was significantly reduced following the removal of the KH1-4 domains of the IGF2BP proteins, indicating that the KH1-4 domains were required for circPLIN2 to directly bind to the IGF2BP proteins (Fig. 4N–P). Interestingly, the KH domains were the key domains for the binding of IGF2BP proteins to downstream target genes [35], suggesting that the KH domains may provide a common site for binding among circPLIN2, IGF2BP proteins, and c-Myc or MARCKSL1 mRNA. Collectively, these data suggested that circPLIN2 increased the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs by binding to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins.
Overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 alleviates the inhibitory effect of circPLIN2 knockdown on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ccRCC cells in vitro
We constructed c-Myc and MARCKSL1 overexpression vectors to explore their involvement in the circPLIN2-regulated development and progression of ccRCC. CCK-8 cell viability assays showed that circPLIN2 knockdown significantly inhibited the proliferation of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells, while overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 significantly promoted the proliferation of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells, suggesting that overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 rescued the inhibitory effect of circPLIN2 knockdown on the proliferation of ccRCC cells (Fig. 5A, B). Similar results were obtained in the colony formation assays. Overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 rescued the long-term inhibitory effect of circPLIN2 knockdown on the proliferation of ccRCC cells (Fig. 5C, D). Furthermore, the results of wound-healing assays showed that circPLIN2 knockdown substantially decreased the wound-healing speed of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells, while overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 markedly accelerated the wound-healing speed of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells, revealing that overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 rescued the inhibitory effect of circPLIN2 knockdown on the migration of ccRCC cells (Fig. 5E, F). In addition, the Matrigel-coated Transwell assays indicated that overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 significantly rescued the suppressive effect of circPLIN2 knockdown on the invasion of ccRCC cells in vitro (Fig. 5G, H). Taken together, overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 rescued the inhibitory effect of circPLIN2 knockdown on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ccRCC cells in vitro, suggesting that c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mediated the regulatory effects of circPLIN2 on ccRCC development and progression.
circPLIN2 competitively sponges miR-199a-3p to abolish its repressive effect on ZEB1 expression
Based on accumulating evidence, circRNAs function as sponges for miRNAs to regulate gene expression through the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) mechanism [11,12,13,14]. As circPLIN2 was preferentially distributed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1H–K), we investigated whether circPLIN2 might also function through a ceRNA mechanism. We first made predictions using the circBank (http://www.circbank.cn/index.html) database and selected 10 miRNAs that might be sponged by circPLIN2 for further validation (Fig. 6A). The dual-luciferase reporter assays showed that miR-199a-3p exerted a particularly significant inhibitory effect on the luciferase activity of circPLIN2, suggesting that circPLIN2 might sponge miR-199a-3p (Fig. 6B). We constructed a circPLIN2 dual-luciferase reporter with the mutated miR-199a-3p binding site to further verify that circPLIN2 sponged miR-199a-3p (Supplementary Fig. 5A). The results of dual-luciferase reporter assays showed that wild-type (WT) circPLIN2 luciferase activity was significantly inhibited by miR-199a-3p, while mutated (MUT) circPLIN2 luciferase activity was not affected (Fig. 6C). In addition, the results of RNA immunoprecipitation assays showed that circPLIN2 was drastically enriched on AGO2 protein compared with the control IgG, and the enrichment of circPLIN2 on AGO2 protein was further increased when miR-199a-3p was added (Fig. 6D). These data revealed that circPLIN2 sponged miR-199a-3p (Fig. 6A–D).
Next, we predicted the target genes of miR-199a-3p using the TargetScan (https://www.targetscan.org/), PicTar (https://pictar.mdc-berlin.de/), microT (https://mrmicrot.imsi.athenarc.gr/), miRmap (https://mirmap.ezlab.org/), and PITA (https://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/mir07/index.html) databases. We identified 88 target genes that coappeared in these five databases (Fig. 6E). We further performed an enrichment analysis of the Gene Ontology molecular functions (GO_MF enrichment) of these 88 target genes of miR-199a-3p using the DAVID tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) and found that the P value of the “transcription corepressor activity” term was the most significant (P = 0.000351) (Fig. 6F). Seven target genes of miR-199a-3p appeared in the “transcription corepressor activity” term, including AEBP2, CITED2, MEIS2, RUNX1, ZEB1, ZHX1, and ZHX2. According to RT–qPCR assays, circPLIN2 knockdown substantially suppressed ZEB1 expression but had no effect on the expression levels of AEBP2, CITED2, MEIS2, RUNX1, ZHX1, and ZHX2 (Fig. 6G). Similarly, circPLIN2 overexpression significantly increased ZEB1 expression, while the expression levels of AEBP2, CITED2, MEIS2, RUNX1, ZHX1, and ZHX2 showed no obvious changes (Fig. 6H). Moreover, wild-type (WT) and mutated (MUT) ZEB1 dual-luciferase reporters targeting the miR-199a-3p binding site were constructed to detect the binding of ZEB1 and miR-199a-3p (Supplementary Fig. 5B). The results of the dual-luciferase reporter assays showed that the addition of miR-199a-3p significantly inhibited wild-type ZEB1 luciferase activity, while mutated ZEB1 luciferase activity was not affected, suggesting that ZEB1 sponged miR-199a-3p (Fig. 6I).
Next, we considered whether a ceRNA mechanism existed among circPLIN2, miR-199a-3p, and ZEB1. The RT–qPCR results showed that miR-199a-3p significantly reduced ZEB1 expression, while circPLIN2 overexpression abolished the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression (Fig. 6J, K). In addition, the results of the dual-luciferase reporter assays indicated that circPLIN2 overexpression significantly increased wild-type ZEB1 luciferase activity, while circPLIN2 knockdown markedly decreased wild-type ZEB1 luciferase activity (Fig. 6L). Moreover, mutated ZEB1 luciferase activity was not affected by circPLIN2 overexpression or knockdown (Fig. 6L). These results revealed an endogenous RNA competition relationship between circPLIN2 and ZEB1 for miR-199a-3p. Collectively, these results suggested that circPLIN2 competitively sponged miR-199a-3p to abolish the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression.
circPLIN2 exerts its carcinogenic effects on ccRCC cells via the miR-199a-3p/ZEB1 axis in vitro
Next, we investigated whether the circPLIN2/miR-199a-3p/ZEB1 molecular signaling pathway participated in the development and progression of ccRCC. The results of CCK-8 cell viability assays showed that circPLIN2 knockdown significantly repressed the proliferation of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells, and the proliferation of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells was further inhibited when miR-199a-3p was added (Fig. 7A, B). Overexpression of ZEB1 rescued the inhibitory effects of circPLIN2 knockdown and the addition of miR-199a-3p on the proliferation of ccRCC cells (Fig. 7A, B). Similar results were obtained in the colony formation assays. ZEB1 overexpression drastically rescued the long-term suppressive effects of circPLIN2 knockdown and the addition of miR-199a-3p on the proliferation of ccRCC cells (Fig. 7C, D). Furthermore, the wound-healing assays indicated that circPLIN2 knockdown markedly reduced the wound-healing speeds of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells, and the wound-healing speeds of ACHN and OS-RC-2 cells were even slower when miR-199a-3p was added, while ZEB1 overexpression significantly rescued the inhibitory effects of circPLIN2 knockdown and the addition of miR-199a-3p on the migration of ccRCC cells (Fig. 7E, F). Moreover, the results of Matrigel-coated Transwell assays indicated that ZEB1 overexpression noticeably rescued the repressive effects of circPLIN2 knockdown and the addition of miR-199a-3p on the invasion of ccRCC cells in vitro (Fig. 7G, H). Overall, our data suggested that the circPLIN2/miR-199a-3p/ZEB1 molecular signaling pathway was involved in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ccRCC cells.
circPLIN2 promotes ccRCC tumor growth and metastasis in vivo
To examine the effect of circPLIN2 on the growth and metastasis of ccRCC cells in vivo, ACHN cells with stable low or high expression of circPLIN2 were injected into nude mice to establish a subcutaneous xenograft tumor model and a lung metastasis model. In the subcutaneous xenograft tumor model, stable knockdown of circPLIN2 significantly inhibited the growth of ACHN cells in vivo (Fig. 8A), while stable overexpression of circPLIN2 drastically promoted the growth of ACHN cells in vivo (Fig. 8B). In addition, the volumes of subcutaneous xenograft tumors indicated that stable knockdown of circPLIN2 markedly decreased the volumes of tumors in nude mice compared with the control group (Fig. 8C), whereas stable overexpression of circPLIN2 produced the opposite results (Fig. 8D), consistent with the results of weight measurement of subcutaneous xenograft tumors (Fig. 8E, F). In the lung metastasis model, suppression of circPLIN2 led to an apparent decrease in lung metastasis (Supplementary Fig. 6A, B), while circPLIN2 overexpression significantly promoted tumor metastasis in the lungs (Supplementary Fig. 6C, D). Furthermore, HE staining suggested fewer lung tumor foci and smaller volumes of lung metastatic nodules in the circPLIN2 knockdown group than in the control group (Supplementary Fig. 6E), whereas the circPLIN2 overexpression group displayed the opposite results (Supplementary Fig. 6F). Collectively, circPLIN2 may play an important role in promoting the growth and metastasis of ccRCC cells in vivo.
Discussion
In this study, we indicated the oncogenic roles of circPLIN2 and determined its underlying mechanism in the development and progression of ccRCC. We first explored the circRNA expression profiles in 10 paired samples of RCC from GSE124453 and GSE108735 in the GEO database. We initially identified hsa_circ_0086457, designated circPLIN2, derived from exons 4 to 5 of the PLIN2 gene. We found that circPLIN2 was preferentially distributed in the cytoplasm of ccRCC cells and had a longer half-life and a stronger resistance to RNase R digestion than its linear counterpart PLIN2. The expression of circPLIN2 was significantly upregulated in ccRCC cells and tissues, and its overexpression was correlated with higher clinical stage and worse prognosis for ccRCC patients. Intriguingly, depletion of circPLIN2 significantly attenuated the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ccRCC cells in vitro and ccRCC tumor growth and metastasis in vivo, whereas overexpression of circPLIN2 produced the opposite effects, suggesting that elevated circPLIN2 expression may be a cancer-promoting event in ccRCC. Mechanistically, circPLIN2 not only increased the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs by binding to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins but also competitively sponged miR-199a-3p to abolish the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression, ultimately resulting in ccRCC tumorigenesis and progression. Together, these findings indicated the oncogenic function of circPLIN2 and its potential molecular mechanism in which elevated circPLIN2 participated in the development and progression of ccRCC by binding IGF2BP proteins and miR-199a-3p to regulate the expression of their target genes, including c-Myc, MARCKSL1, and ZEB1 (Fig. 8G).
According to recent evidence, circRNAs play vital roles in the development and progression of ccRCC [36,37,38,39]. For example, circZNF609, which is highly expressed in various ccRCC cell lines, acts as a sponge for miR-138-5p to upregulate FOXP4 expression and promote the growth and invasion of ccRCC [36]. Intriguingly, circZNF609 can be translated into a functional small protein in myoblasts [40], which is regulated by its own m6A modification [41]. Hence, we consider whether circZNF609 is translated into a protein and plays regulatory role in ccRCC, which requires further exploration in the future. As another example showed, circTLK1 was not merely substantially upregulated in ccRCC cells and tissues but was related to the distant metastasis of tumors and the prognosis of ccRCC patients [37]. Moreover, circTLK1 upregulated CBX4 expression by competitively sponging miR-136-5p to exert its oncogenic activity [37]. Although these circRNAs have been shown to be involved in the development and progression of ccRCC, their key regulatory roles and molecular mechanisms have not been fully clarified. In addition, novel circRNAs must be further identified in ccRCC.
In this study, we selected 10 paired RCC samples with circRNA expression data from GSE124453 and GSE108735 in the GEO database for joint analysis to more accurately detect the expression profiles of circRNAs in RCC, which reduced the bias associated with RCC sample selection in two different studies and expanded the RCC sample size to ensure that circRNA expression data more reliable. We found that circPLIN2, an oncogene, was significantly highly expressed in ccRCC cells and tissues, and its overexpression was correlated with higher clinical stage and worse prognosis for ccRCC patients. Furthermore, circPLIN2 promoted ccRCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and ccRCC tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. These results are similar to the performance and function of circTLK1, circSDHC, and circPRRC2A in ccRCC [37, 42, 43]. However, unlike circPLIN2, circRAPGEF5 and circAKT3 were expressed at significantly lower levels in ccRCC and inhibited the malignant progression of ccRCC [44, 45]. Overall, these conflicting results for circRNA performance in ccRCC may be partially explained by the fact that circRNAs participate in different molecular signaling pathways.
Notably, based on the results predicted using the circBank database, although circPLIN2 contains an open reading frame (ORF), circPLIN2 lacks the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements [46] and m6A (N6-methyladenosine) modification [24, 47] required for the translation of circRNAs [48]; therefore, circPLIN2 may not have translation potential. We speculate that circPLIN2 may regulate the expression of downstream genes by binding to proteins or sponging miRNAs in the cytoplasm. In the present study, we described the binding of circPLIN2 and IGF2BP proteins, including IGF2BP1, IGF2BP2, and IGF2BP3 proteins. IGF2BP proteins, which are mainly enriched in the cytoplasm, recognize and bind target mRNAs in an m6A-dependent manner and function as stabilizers to inhibit the degradation of their target mRNAs [35]. The IGF2BP proteins contain six key domains, including the RRM1-2 domains and KH1-4 domains, and the KH1-4 domains are required for the binding of IGF2BP proteins and target mRNAs [35]. Interestingly, the specific circPLIN2-binding domains in IGF2BP proteins happened to be the KH1-4 domains, suggesting that the KH1-4 domains might represent a common site of action among circPLIN2, IGF2BP proteins, and the c-Myc or MARCKSL1 mRNA. In our study, circPLIN2 increased the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs by binding to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins. Moreover, the oncogenes c-Myc [49, 50] and MARCKSL1 [51, 52] participate in the development and progression of cancers. Subsequent rescue assays showed that overexpression of c-Myc or MARCKSL1 significantly rescued the inhibitory effects of circPLIN2 knockdown on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ccRCC cells, suggesting that c-Myc and MARCKSL1 were involved in the circPLIN2-regulated development and progression of ccRCC.
In addition, we identified an underlying ceRNA mechanism in which circPLIN2 competitively sponged miR-199a-3p to abolish the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression. Subsequent rescue assays further showed that the circPLIN2/miR-199a-3p/ZEB1 molecular signaling pathway participated in the development and progression of ccRCC. Intriguingly, ZEB1, a transcriptional repressor, inhibits E-cadherin transcription by recruiting BRG1 and promotes the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and tumor progression [53]. Hence, we speculate that the EMT may be involved in the circPLIN2-regulated development and progression of ccRCC, which requires further evaluation. Moreover, ZEB1 suppresses the expression of stemness-inhibiting miR-200 and miR-203 and promotes tumor proliferation and progression [54]. Therefore, we speculate that miR-200 and miR-203 may also participate in circPLIN2-mediated ccRCC progression, which also needs to be further confirmed.
Notably, circRNAs play important roles in the multilevel regulation of gene expression, including by functioning as miRNA sponges [11,12,13,14], participating in RNA‒protein interactions [15,16,17,18,19,20], and through their protein-coding ability [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Intriguingly, in the present study, circPLIN2 bound to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins to increase the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL mRNAs and promote the development and progression of ccRCC. Moreover, circPLIN2 also competitively sponged miR-199a-3p to abolish the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression as a method to exert its carcinogenic effects on ccRCC. In fact, we prove that circPLIN2 binding to IGF2BP proteins and sponging of miR-199a-3p both play important roles in the development and progression of ccRCC. However, to date, we have not determined whether circPLIN2 binding to IGF2BP proteins or sponging of miR-199a-3p is more important for the development and progression of ccRCC, which requires further investigation in the future.
In conclusion, our study suggests that circPLIN2 functions as an oncogene and participates in the development and progression of ccRCC. In addition, circPLIN2 not only regulates the stability of the c-Myc and MARCKSL1 mRNAs by binding to the KH domains of IGF2BP proteins but also sponges miR-199a-3p to abolish the repressive effect of miR-199a-3p on ZEB1 expression, ultimately resulting in ccRCC tumorigenesis and progression. According to these data, circPLIN2 may serve as a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for ccRCC patients.
Materials and methods
Bioinformatics analysis of the circRNA expression profile in RCC
We first retrieved circRNA expression data in RCC from the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) and obtained the GSE124453 and GSE108735 datasets. Then, we downloaded the raw data from the GSE124453 and GSE108735 datasets from the SRA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) and converted them into FASTQ format using Sratoolkit software (version 2.9.2) (https://hpc.nih.gov/apps/sratoolkit.html). The FASTQ files were aligned to the human hg38 reference using STAR software (version 2.7.1a) (https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR) [55]. circRNAs were subsequently calculated and identified using DCC software (https://github.com/dieterich-lab/DCC) with the default parameters [56]. Next, the circRNAs identified were filtered by read count more than 5 and expressed samples over 30%. The function and identities of circRNAs were then annotated using the circBase database (http://www.circbase.org) [57]. DESeq2 was used to read the raw count matrix after filtration, and normalization was performed using the variance stabilizing transformation algorithm [58]. Significantly differentially expressed circRNAs between RCC and normal samples were screened with the criteria of adjusted p value less than 0.05 and absolute value of log2(fold change) more than 2. The results of the bioinformatics analysis were eventually visualized as a heatmap and a volcano plot.
Plasmid construction and cell transfection assay
Referring to the method for constructing the circTP63 overexpression vector described in a previous study [59], we successfully constructed the circPLIN2 overexpression vector through homologous recombination using the pLCDH-ciR plasmid. For cell transfection assays, briefly, cells were first seeded on 6-well plates and grown to a confluence of ~50%. Next, cells were transfected with circPLIN2 or the vector using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol and then cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 48–72 h. Finally, circPLIN2 expression was assessed using RT–qPCR. In addition, the c-Myc, MARCKSL1, and ZEB1 overexpression vectors were designed and constructed by GENE (Shanghai, China) using the GV658 plasmid. GFP-tagged wild-type and truncated IGF2BP vectors were designed and constructed by GENE using the pEGFP-C2 plasmid. The primers used for plasmid construction are listed in Supplementary Table 4.
Xenograft model
For tumor formation assays in vivo, thirty female athymic BALB/c nude mice, aged 6–8 weeks and purchased from Gempharmatech (Nanjing, China), were raised in an SPF environment and received care according to the protocols. These nude mice were randomly and equally divided into lentivirus-circPLIN2-NC, lentivirus-circPLIN2-shRNA 1, lentivirus-circPLIN2-shRNA 2, lentivirus-vector and lentivirus-circPLIN2 groups. Next, 100 µl of ACHN cell suspension containing 1 × 106 cells with stable high or low expression of circPLIN2 was subcutaneously injected into the right flank of each mouse in the corresponding group. The volumes of subcutaneous xenograft tumors were measured every 5 days beginning on the 15th day after injection. After 35 days, the nude mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the tumor tissues were measured, weighed, and photographed. In addition, the tumor volume was calculated as (length × width × height)/2. For tumor metastasis assays in vivo, twenty-four female athymic BALB/c nude mice aged 6–8 weeks were randomly and equally divided into lentivirus-circPLIN2-NC, lentivirus-circPLIN2-shRNA 1, lentivirus-vector and lentivirus-circPLIN2 groups. Briefly, 100 µl of ACHN cell suspension containing 1 × 106 cells with stable high or low expression of circPLIN2 was injected into the tail vein of each mouse in the corresponding group. After 4 weeks of feeding, the nude mice were sacrificed, and the lung metastatic nodules were evaluated by a pathologist. Finally, the lung tissues were removed for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. All animal assays were performed in accordance with animal use protocols approved by the Committee for the Ethics of Animal Experiments, Shenzhen Peking University - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center (protocol number 2021-565).
Statistical analysis
The IBM SPSS package (version 23.0) and GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0) were used for statistical analyses. All data in this study are presented as the means ± S.D. of the values from triplicate assays. Two-tailed Student’s t test was used to compare two independent groups. Spearman’s test was performed to analyze the correlations for categorical variables. The Kaplan–Meier test was performed for the univariate analysis of overall survival, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for the multivariate analysis of overall survival. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 were considered statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Code availability
The computer code used during the current study is available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.
Shuch B, Amin A, Armstrong AJ, Eble JN, Ficarra V, Lopez-Beltran A, et al. Understanding pathologic variants of renal cell carcinoma: distilling therapeutic opportunities from biologic complexity. Eur Urol. 2015;67:85–97.
Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S, Swanton C, Albiges L, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3:17009.
Gray RE, Harris GT. Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99:179–84.
Barata PC, Rini BI. Treatment of renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:507–24.
Makhov P, Joshi S, Ghatalia P, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Kolenko VM. Resistance to systemic therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: mechanisms and management strategies. Mol Cancer Therapeutics. 2018;17:1355–64.
Rini BI, Campbell SC, Escudier B. Renal cell carcinoma. Lancet. 2009;373:1119–32.
Kristensen LS, Jakobsen T, Hager H, Kjems J. The emerging roles of circRNAs in cancer and oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19:188–206.
Kristensen LS, Andersen MS, Stagsted LVW, Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB, Kjems J. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:675–91.
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang P, Fu X, Lin W. Circular RNAs in renal cell carcinoma: implications for tumorigenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:149.
Wang Y, Han D, Zhou T, Zhang J, Liu C, Cao F, et al. Melatonin ameliorates aortic valve calcification via the regulation of circular RNA CircRIC3/miR-204-5p/DPP4 signaling in valvular interstitial cells. J Pineal Res. 2020;69:e12666.
Zeng Z, Xia L, Fan S, Zheng J, Qin J, Fan X, et al. Circular RNA CircMAP3K5 acts as a MicroRNA-22-3p sponge to promote resolution of intimal hyperplasia via TET2-mediated smooth muscle cell differentiation. Circulation 2021;143:354–71.
Xiao L, Ma XX, Luo J, Chung HK, Kwon MS, Yu TX, et al. Circular RNA CircHIPK3 promotes homeostasis of the intestinal epithelium by reducing MicroRNA 29b function. Gastroenterology 2021;161:1303–17.e3.
Li Q, Pan X, Zhu D, Deng Z, Jiang R, Wang X. Circular RNA MAT2B promotes glycolysis and malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma through the miR-338-3p/PKM2 axis under hypoxic stress. Hepatology. 2019;70:1298–316.
Song C, Zhang Y, Huang W, Shi J, Huang Q, Jiang M, et al. Circular RNA Cwc27 contributes to Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis by repressing Pur-α activity. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:393–406.
Li B, Zhu L, Lu C, Wang C, Wang H, Jin H, et al. circNDUFB2 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression via destabilizing IGF2BPs and activating anti-tumor immunity. Nat Commun. 2021;12:295.
Chen Y, Yang F, Fang E, Xiao W, Mei H, Li H, et al. Circular RNA circAGO2 drives cancer progression through facilitating HuR-repressed functions of AGO2-miRNA complexes. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:1346–64.
Garikipati VNS, Verma SK, Cheng Z, Liang D, Truongcao MM, Cimini M, et al. Circular RNA CircFndc3b modulates cardiac repair after myocardial infarction via FUS/VEGF-A axis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4317.
Sun YM, Wang WT, Zeng ZC, Chen TQ, Han C, Pan Q, et al. circMYBL2, a circRNA from MYBL2, regulates FLT3 translation by recruiting PTBP1 to promote FLT3-ITD AML progression. Blood 2019;134:1533–46.
Wang S, Chao F, Zhang C, Han D, Xu G, Chen G. Circular RNA circPFKP promotes cell proliferation by activating IMPDH2 in prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022;524:109–20.
Gao X, Xia X, Li F, Zhang M, Zhou H, Wu X, et al. Circular RNA-encoded oncogenic E-cadherin variant promotes glioblastoma tumorigenicity through activation of EGFR-STAT3 signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23:278–91.
Liang ZX, Liu HS, Xiong L, Yang X, Wang FW, Zeng ZW, et al. A novel NF-κB regulator encoded by circPLCE1 inhibits colorectal carcinoma progression by promoting RPS3 ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:103.
van Heesch S, Witte F, Schneider-Lunitz V, Schulz JF, Adami E, Faber AB, et al. The translational landscape of the human heart. Cell 2019;178:242–60.e29.
Yang Y, Fan X, Mao M, Song X, Wu P, Zhang Y, et al. Extensive translation of circular RNAs driven by N(6)-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 2017;27:626–41.
Li Y, Chen B, Zhao J, Li Q, Chen S, Guo T, et al. HNRNPL circularizes ARHGAP35 to produce an oncogenic protein. Adv Sci. 2021;8:2001701.
Zhang L, Hou C, Chen C, Guo Y, Yuan W, Yin D, et al. The role of N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) modification in the regulation of circRNAs. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:105.
Xu J, Ji L, Liang Y, Wan Z, Zheng W, Song X, et al. CircRNA-SORE mediates sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by stabilizing YBX1. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:298.
Huang W, Fang K, Chen TQ, Zeng ZC, Sun YM, Han C, et al. circRNA circAF4 functions as an oncogene to regulate MLL-AF4 fusion protein expression and inhibit MLL leukemia progression. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:103.
Chen B, Wang M, Huang R, Liao K, Wang T, Yang R, et al. Circular RNA circLGMN facilitates glioblastoma progression by targeting miR-127-3p/LGMN axis. Cancer Lett. 2021;522:225–37.
Gong W, Xu J, Wang Y, Min Q, Chen X, Zhang W, et al. Nuclear genome-derived circular RNA circPUM1 localizes in mitochondria and regulates oxidative phosphorylation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:40.
Chen S, Huang V, Xu X, Livingstone J, Soares F, Jeon J, et al. Widespread and functional RNA circularization in localized prostate cancer. Cell 2019;176:831–43.e22.
Wang J, Zhang Y, Song H, Yin H, Jiang T, Xu Y, et al. The circular RNA circSPARC enhances the migration and proliferation of colorectal cancer by regulating the JAK/STAT pathway. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:81.
Zheng L, Liang H, Zhang Q, Shen Z, Sun Y, Zhao X, et al. circPTEN1, a circular RNA generated from PTEN, suppresses cancer progression through inhibition of TGF-β/Smad signaling. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:41.
Yu J, Xu QG, Wang ZG, Yang Y, Zhang L, Ma JZ, et al. Circular RNA cSMARCA5 inhibits growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;68:1214–27.
Huang H, Weng H, Sun W, Qin X, Shi H, Wu H, et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:285–95.
Xiong Y, Zhang J, Song C. CircRNA ZNF609 functions as a competitive endogenous RNA to regulate FOXP4 expression by sponging miR-138-5p in renal carcinoma. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:10646–54.
Li J, Huang C, Zou Y, Ye J, Yu J, Gui Y. CircTLK1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of renal cell carcinoma by sponging miR-136-5p. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:103.
Wang K, Sun Y, Tao W, Fei X, Chang C. Androgen receptor (AR) promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) migration and invasion via altering the circHIAT1/miR-195-5p/29a-3p/29c-3p/CDC42 signals. Cancer Lett. 2017;394:1–12.
Han Z, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Chen J, Chang C, Wang X, et al. ERβ-mediated alteration of circATP2B1 and miR-204-3p signaling promotes invasion of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78:2550–63.
Legnini I, Di Timoteo G, Rossi F, Morlando M, Briganti F, Sthandier O, et al. Circ-ZNF609 is a circular RNA that can be translated and functions in myogenesis. Mol cell. 2017;66:22–37.e9.
Di Timoteo G, Dattilo D, Centrón-Broco A, Colantoni A, Guarnacci M, Rossi F, et al. Modulation of circRNA Metabolism by m(6)A Modification. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107641.
Cen J, Liang Y, Huang Y, Pan Y, Shu G, Zheng Z, et al. Circular RNA circSDHC serves as a sponge for miR-127-3p to promote the proliferation and metastasis of renal cell carcinoma via the CDKN3/E2F1 axis. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:19.
Li W, Yang FQ, Sun CM, Huang JH, Zhang HM, Li X, et al. circPRRC2A promotes angiogenesis and metastasis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and upregulates TRPM3 in renal cell carcinoma. Theranostics 2020;10:4395–409.
Chen Q, Liu T, Bao Y, Zhao T, Wang J, Wang H, et al. CircRNA cRAPGEF5 inhibits the growth and metastasis of renal cell carcinoma via the miR-27a-3p/TXNIP pathway. Cancer Lett. 2020;469:68–77.
Xue D, Wang H, Chen Y, Shen D, Lu J, Wang M, et al. Circ-AKT3 inhibits clear cell renal cell carcinoma metastasis via altering miR-296-3p/E-cadherin signals. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:151.
Abe N, Matsumoto K, Nishihara M, Nakano Y, Shibata A, Maruyama H, et al. Rolling circle translation of circular RNA in living human cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16435.
Meyer KD, Patil DP, Zhou J, Zinoviev A, Skabkin MA, Elemento O, et al. 5’ UTR m(6)A promotes cap-independent translation. Cell 2015;163:999–1010.
Wesselhoeft RA, Kowalski PS, Anderson DG. Engineering circular RNA for potent and stable translation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2629.
Madden SK, de Araujo AD, Gerhardt M, Fairlie DP, Mason JM. Taking the Myc out of cancer: toward therapeutic strategies to directly inhibit c-Myc. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:3.
Sorolla A, Wang E, Golden E, Duffy C, Henriques ST, Redfern AD, et al. Precision medicine by designer interference peptides: applications in oncology and molecular therapeutics. Oncogene 2020;39:1167–84.
Björkblom B, Padzik A, Mohammad H, Westerlund N, Komulainen E, Hollos P, et al. c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylation of MARCKSL1 determines actin stability and migration in neurons and in cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:3513–26.
Liang W, Gao R, Yang M, Wang X, Cheng K, Shi X, et al. MARCKSL1 promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Oncol Lett. 2020;19:2272–80.
Sánchez-Tilló E, Lázaro A, Torrent R, Cuatrecasas M, Vaquero EC, Castells A, et al. ZEB1 represses E-cadherin and induces an EMT by recruiting the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling protein BRG1. Oncogene 2010;29:3490–500.
Wellner U, Schubert J, Burk UC, Schmalhofer O, Zhu F, Sonntag A, et al. The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1487–95.
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.
Cheng J, Metge F, Dieterich C. Specific identification and quantification of circular RNAs from sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:1094–6.
Glažar P, Papavasileiou P, Rajewsky N. circBase: a database for circular RNAs. RNA. 2014;20:1666–70.
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
Cheng Z, Yu C, Cui S, Wang H, Jin H, Wang C, et al. circTP63 functions as a ceRNA to promote lung squamous cell carcinoma progression by upregulating FOXM1. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3200.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Biomedical Research Institute of Shenzhen Peking University - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center for providing platform support and technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81874249), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515011125 and 2021A1515011558), Shenzhen Basic Research Grants (JCYJ20180223181224405, JCYJ20180507182657867 and JCYJ20210324110008023) and Scientific Research Foundation of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (KYQD2021038 and KYQD2021049).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BZ performed most of the experiments and data analysis and wrote the manuscript. CH performed animal experiments and participated in data analysis and discussions of the results. JP and XC revised the manuscript. HH, XL, KZ, FZ, XS, JW, and BY participated in the data analysis and discussion of the results. BZ, XC, and WZ designed the overall study, supervised the experiments, and discussed the results.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Dr Barak Rotblat
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, B., Huang, C., Pan, J. et al. circPLIN2 promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression by binding IGF2BP proteins and miR-199a-3p. Cell Death Dis 13, 1030 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05488-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05488-z
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The relationship between the network of non-coding RNAs-molecular targets and N6-methyladenosine modification in tumors of urinary system
Cell Death & Disease (2024)
-
The role of circular RNA targeting IGF2BPs in cancer—a potential target for cancer therapy
Journal of Molecular Medicine (2024)
-
The role of circular RNA during the urological cancer metastasis: exploring regulatory mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews (2024)
-
hsa_circ_0003596, as a novel oncogene, regulates the malignant behavior of renal cell carcinoma by modulating glycolysis
European Journal of Medical Research (2023)