Abstract
Aberrant activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is closely related to the development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, targeted EGFR therapeutics such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) face the challenge of EGFR mutation-mediated resistance. Here, we showed that the reduced JmjC domain-containing 5 (JMJD5) expression is negatively associated with EGFR stability and NSCLC progression. Mechanically, JMJD5 cooperated with E3 ligase HUWE1 to destabilize EGFR and EGFR TKI-resistant mutants for proteasomal degradation, thereby inhibiting NSCLC growth and promoting TKI sensitivity. Furthermore, we identified that JMJD5 can be transported into recipient cells via extracellular vesicles, thereby inhibiting the growth of NSCLC. Together, our findings demonstrate the tumor-suppressive role of JMJD5 in NSCLC and suggest a putative therapeutic strategy for EGFR-related NSCLC by targeting JMJD5 to destabilize EGFR.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) enacts critical roles in epithelial tissue maintenance and is often abnormally activated in epithelial malignancies, including lung cancer [1,2,3]. EGFR signaling activation, such as gene amplification and somatic activating mutations (e.g., L858R and exon 19 deletions), is a major driver of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which constitutes more than 85% of all lung cancer cases [3, 4]. Currently, molecular targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib, have been widely used to treat patients with EGFR-activating mutations in NSCLC and have significantly improved patient outcomes [5]. Unfortunately, despite the well initial clinical responsiveness, most patients inevitably developed acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, in which the gatekeeper mutation T790M of EGFR accounts for about 50% of all TKIs resistant cases. Although new generation TKIs (e.g., osimertinib) have been developed to overcome T790M-driven resistance, newly acquired EGFR-resistant mutations have also emerged (e.g., EGFR C797S and G796D/R/S mutations) [6]. Furthermore, in addition to the occurred resistance, EGFR TKIs are more associated with EGFR-activating mutations than wild-type EGFR (WT-EGFR), indicating that this strategy was of relatively little benefit to the majority of lung cancer patients with WT-EGFR. Increasing evidence suggests that elevated WT-EGFR expression not only contributes to the pathogenesis of lung cancer but also associates with acquired EGFR TKIs resistance [6,7,8,9]. Thus, it is necessary to discover new reliable therapeutic strategies targeting either mutant EGFR or WT-EGFR with alternative mechanisms.
The binding of ligands to the extracellular domain of EGFR initiates receptor dimerization, phosphorylation, and downstream signaling activation (MAPK, PI3K/AKT, JAK/STAT, etc.), which controls cell growth and survival [10]. Internalized EGFR can be degraded or recycled back to the cell surface, which is crucial for signal termination or maintenance. Accumulating studies show that dysregulation of EGFR spatial distribution and stability also critically contributes to abnormal EGFR signaling and lung cancer progression [3]. Mitogen-inducible gene 6 (Mig6) fails to mediate the degradation of mutant EGFR, and deletion of Mig6 promotes tumor initiation and mutant EGFR-driven lung cancer progression [11]. Pseudokinase Tribble 3 (TRIB3) contributes to NSCLC development by increasing EGFR recycling and stability [12]. Activation of F-box protein FBXL2 destabilizes EGFR, thereby inhibiting EGFR-driven NSCLC growth [13]. These findings highlight promoting EGFR degradation as an alternative strategy against EGFR-related cancers.
JmjC (Jumonji-C) domain-containing 5 (JMJD5) (also called KDM8) is a 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG) dependent oxygenase of the JmjC subfamily. Although JMJD5 was originally defined as a lysine demethylase [14], we and others later identified its role as a hydroxylase and protease [15,16,17,18]. By shuttling between the nucleus and cytoplasm, JMJD5 could either associate with histones or cytosolic proteins, and thus plays an important role in embryonic development [19, 20], circadian regulation [21, 22], osteoclastogenesis [15], and stem-cell renewal [23]. JMJD5 influences gene transcription through a variety of mechanisms, including regulation of protein stability, nuclear translocation of transcription factors, and digestion of methylated histone tails to modulate chromatin conformation [15, 17, 18, 24,25,26]. Recently, JMJD5 has also been discovered to associate with cancer development. It is highly expressed in breast, prostate, and colorectal tumors as well as oral squamous cell carcinomas and promotes the growth of respective cancer cell lines [14, 25, 27,28,29,30]. On the other hand, JMJD5 is downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma [31] and pancreatic cancer [32] and negatively regulates cancer progression, indicating heterogeneity of JMJD5 among different tumor types. Notably, our previous study found that JMJD5 is downregulated in malignant effusions and lung cancer tissues of patients [33]. However, the role and underlying mechanisms of JMJD5 in lung cancer remain unclear.
In this study, we identified that the reduced JMJD5 expression is negatively associated with EGFR expression and signal activation, and correlated with better survival of NSCLC. We further demonstrated that JMJD5 interacts with EGFR and promotes its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation by recruiting E3 ligase HUWE1. Notably, overexpression of JMJD5 significantly inhibits NSCLC cell growth and promotes the sensitivity of cells to EGFR TKI, and enhanced exosomal transferring of JMJD5 may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC to target EGFR.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and reagents
Human NSCLC cell lines A549, H1299, H1975, H1650, HCC827, PC9, and H226 and human leukemia K562 cells were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, USA). All cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. All cell lines have been validated by STR profiling within the last three years and were tested for mycoplasma and microbial contamination.
Recombinant human EGF was purchased from PeproTech (PeproTech, USA). MG132 (S2619), Gefitinib (S1025), and AZD9291 (S7297) were from Selleck (Selleck, USA). Cycloheximide (HY-12320) and Chloroquine (HY-17589A) were from MedChemExpress (MCE, USA).
Plasmids, transfection, and lentiviral infection
The full-length and deletion mutants of human EGFR and JMJD5 were constructed into a pcDNA3.1(+) vector with a 6×Myc-tag or a Flag-tag. Human pENTR1A-HUWE1 was obtained from addgene (#37431). A pLVX-puro vector was used to generate recombinant lentiviruses expressing human JMJD5 with a Flag-tag or human EGFR with an eGFP-tag. Lentiviral plasmids and packaging plasmids (psPAX2, pMD2.G) were co-transfected into HEK293FT cells to produce lentivirus. The short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting human JMJD5 was generated by the insertion of specific oligos into a pLVX shRNA1 lentiviral vector. The transfection of siRNAs targeting human JMJD5, EGFR, and HUWE1 were performed by using Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Sequences of shRNA and siRNA were shown in Table S1. Primers were shown in Table S2.
Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)
Western blotting and Co-IP were performed as previously described [34]. In this study, the following antibodies were used: EGFR (1902-1) was from Epitomics (Epitomics, USA). JMJD5 (ab36104) was from Abcam (Abcam, UK). EGFR (sc-373746), JMJD5 (sc-377440), Ubiquitin (sc-8017), and Myc (sc-789) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, USA). p-EGFR (#3777), p-AKT (#9271), AKT (#2920), p-ERK (#4370), ERK (#4696), EEA1 (#3288), LAMP1 (#9091), and Flag (#14793) were from Cell Signaling Technology (CST, USA). HUWE1 (A700-129) was from Bethyl (Bethyl, USA). RAB11 (15903-1-AP) was from Proteintech (Proteintech, China). GAPDH (R1201-1) was from HuaBio (HuaBio, China). Original western blots were presented in Supplementary File.
RNA-seq analysis
Total cellular RNA was extracted by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and RNA-seq analysis was carried out by Biomarker Technologies (Biomarker, China). Mapped gene counts were determined using HT Seq v0.6.1. RPKM (Reads Per Kilo bases per Million reads) was calculated according to the length of the gene and the reads count mapped to the gene. Differential genes were identified with corrected q-value less than 0.05 and fold change greater than 2.
EGFR degradation assay
For degradation with EGF stimulation, cells were maintained in a serum-free medium overnight and treated with EGF (100 ng/ml) for the different indicated times. For degradation without EGF stimulation, cells were maintained in a serum-free medium containing 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for the different indicated times. Cells were then harvested and lysed, and proteins were analyzed by Western blotting.
Ubiquitination assays
For the EGFR ubiquitination assay, HEK293T cells were co-transfected with EGFR-Flag, HA-ubiquitin-Lys 48, HUWE1, Myc-JMJD5, or empty vector for 48 h. Then cells were treated with MG132 (10 μM) for 6 h before harvesting. Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-FLAG M2 Magnetic Beads (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and followed by Western blotting analysis.
Exosome isolation, identification, and uptake
After incubating with exosome free medium for 72 h, the culture supernatants of H1975 cells were collected. Cell debris and large vesicles were removed by centrifugation (500 rcf for 15 min, 2000 rcf for 20 min, and 10,000 rcf for 40 min). The supernatants were further ultracentrifuged at 100,000 rcf for 90 min and isolated exosomes were collected and resuspended in PBS. All steps were performed at 4 °C. Exosomes stained with 2% uranyl acetate were visualized under transmission electron microscopy (Tecnai G2 Spirit, FEI, Czech Republic) at 80.0 kV. A Zeta View system (Particle Metrix, Germany) was used to analyze the size and number of exosomes. For exosome uptake, cells seeded on coverslips were incubated with PKH67 (MKCK7852, Sigma) labeled exosomes for 4–12 h and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The cell membrane was stained with CM-DiI (C7000, Thermo) for 15 min. Cells were then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-100 and the nuclei were stained with DAPI.
Colony formation assay
500–1000 cells per well were seeded into the 6-well dish and cultured with exosome-containing medium (30 μg/ml) or not for about 10 days. After fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were stained with crystal violet. Colony numbers were counted under the microscope and one colony that more than 50 cells was counted.
Transwell assay
4–6 × 104 cells were seeded in the upper chamber of the transwell apparatus (Millipore, USA) containing serum-free medium, and a complete medium containing 30 μg/ml exosome or not was added to the bottom chamber. After 24 h incubation, the migrated cells were further fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with crystal violet.
Xenograft model
The Laboratory Animals Welfare Ethics Review Committee of Zhejiang University approved all animal studies. All mice were randomized into different groups after age and sex matching. 5 × 106 cells were injected subcutaneously into BALB/C nude mice (4-week-old, male) (SLAC, China) (n = 5/group). When the tumor volume was about 50–100 mm3, mice were administered with gefitinib (20 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection) or AZD9291 (5 mg/kg, intragastric administration) once every two days or exosomes (100 μg/mouse, intravenous injection) once a week for 2 weeks. No blinding method was used during administration. The size of xenograft tumor was measured and calculated according to the formula: 0.5 × length × width2. The mice were sacrificed after 4 weeks and xenograft tumors were harvested, weighed, and photographed.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining
The LUAD tumor specimens (n = 108) in this study were obtained from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The ethics committee of the Zhejiang University School of Medicine approved the study. IHC was carried out using Envision Detection System (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) with anti-EGFR (sc-373746) and anti-JMJD5 (sc-377440). Two independent investigators blinded to the clinical data assessed and confirmed the staining results.
Statistical analysis
All results in this paper were performed at least three independent repeats and data were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-tests and one-way ANOVA. The survival curves were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
JMJD5 is negatively related to EGFR expression and correlated with better survival of lung cancer
By analyzing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) databases, we found that the mRNA (Fig. 1A) and protein (Fig. 1B) level of JMJD5 was significantly decreased in NSCLC tissues compared with the normal tissues. To clarify the functions and regulatory molecules of JMJD5 in cancer, we analyzed JMJD5-associated proteins using mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis. Interestingly, EGFR was successfully identified as a major partner of JMJD5 (Fig. S1A). Notably, JMJD5 also exhibited a significant reduction level in EGFR mutant NSCLC tissues, and a negative correlation could be found between JMJD5 and EGFR protein levels (Fig. 1A–C). We then investigated the relationship between JMJD5 and EGFR expression. There was no correlation between the mRNA levels of JMJD5 and EGFR, and the mRNA level of EGFR did not exhibit significant changes after the overexpression of JMJD5 (Figs. S1B–D). However, low JMJD5 protein expression was associated with increased EGFR protein expression in most human NSCLC cell lines, either wild-type or mutant EGFR (Fig. 1D). Moreover, IHC analysis of 108 clinical lung cancer tissues revealed a significant decrease of JMJD5 and increase of EGFR level in tumors compared to adjacent tissues (Fig. 1E, F). We further analyzed the expression of JMJD5 at different stages of human lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). As shown in Fig. 1G and Fig. S1E, IHC and TCGA analyses showed that JMJD5 expression was declined during LUAD development. Survival analysis showed that high expression levels of JMJD5 were positively correlated with better overall survival and post-progression survival of lung cancer patients (Figs. 1H and S1F, G). Furthermore, in NSCLC patients with high EGFR expression, those with high JMJD5 expression have a better survival rate than those with low JMJD5 expression (Fig. 1I).
JMJD5 downregulates the protein level of EGFR and inhibits its signaling activity
To elucidate the relationship and underlying mechanisms between JMJD5 and EGFR, we first established JMJD5 stably overexpressed NSCLC cell lines (A549 cells with high expression of WT-EGFR; H1650 and H1975 cells with EGFR E19del or EGFRL858R/T790M, respectively) and examined EGFR expression. As shown in Fig. 2A and Fig. S2A, ectopic expression of JMJD5 markedly reduced the protein expression but not the mRNA level of WT-EGFR and mutant EGFR. Conversely, the silencing of JMJD5 led to the upregulation of EGFR proteins without affecting mRNA expression (Figs. 2B and S2B). Meanwhile, we also ectopically expressed JMJD5 mutants in NSCLC cells. JMJD5 nuclear localization signal mutant (K166A), which is unable to enter the nucleus, reduced EGFR protein levels similar to wild-type JMJD5, whereas the catalytically inactive mutant of JMJD5 (H321A/D323A) showed a slightly weaker effect (Figs. 2C and S2C). These results suggest that JMJD5 downregulates EGFR protein expression, which is largely independent of its nuclear localization and enzymatic functions.
Next, we examined whether JMJD5 could regulate EGFR downstream signaling. As shown in Fig. 2D, E, enforced JMJD5 expression suppressed EGF-induced phosphorylation of both WT and mutant EGFR (TKI-resistant cell H1650 and TKI-sensitive cell HCC827) as well as the activation of downstream ERK and AKT signaling. By contrast, silencing EGFR effectively abrogated the suppression effects (Fig. 2E). Moreover, in EGFR-negative human leukemia K562 cells, overexpression of JMJD5 only inhibited the activation of ERK and AKT pathways after exogenous EGFR expression (Fig. 2F). We further analyzed gene expression in H1975 cells with stable overexpression of JMJD5 by RNA sequencing. GSEA analysis showed that in the genes downregulated after JMJD5 overexpression, EGF/EGFR signaling pathway-related genes and downstream genes of PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways were significantly enriched (Figs. 2G and S2D). The alterations of related genes were confirmed in NSCLC cell lines with WT or mutant EGFR after enforced JMJD5 expression (Fig. 2H). The combination of JMJD5 overexpression and EGFR silencing further decreased the levels of these genes (Fig. 2I). Altogether, our results suggest that JMJD5 downregulates the expression and phosphorylation of EGFR, which further inhibits the activation of EGFR downstream signaling pathways.
JMJD5 relies on its JmjC domain to interact with the TK domain of EGFR
As suggested by the mass spectrometry data in Fig. S1A, JMJD5 probably influences the function of EGFR by interacting with it. To confirm this point, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay to examine the association between JMJD5 and EGFR. Co-IP analysis revealed that EGFR interacted with exogenous and endogenous JMJD5 (Fig. 3A, B). We further constructed different deletion mutants of JMJD5 and EGFR to map the interaction regions of the two proteins (Fig. 3C). The tyrosine kinase (TK) domain, rather than the adjacent intracellular juxtamembrane (JM) domain, was identified to interact with JMJD5 (Fig. 3D, E), whereas the JmjC domain (amino acids 272–416) of JMJD5 was responsible for the association between JMJD5 and EGFR (Fig. 3F). We then examined the interaction between JMJD5 and common EGFR mutants in NSCLC patients that drive tumorigenesis. Interestingly, all EGFR mutants were able to bind JMJD5, with the TKI-resistant mutants (T790M, C797S) and activating mutant L858R of EGFR showing even stronger binding abilities than WT-EGFR (Fig. 3G). In addition, the immunofluorescence assay showed that JMJD5 was mainly colocalized with WT or mutant EGFR in the cell membrane and cytoplasm (Fig. 3H).
JMJD5 promotes the proteasomal degradation of EGFR by recruiting E3 ligase HUWE1
Dysregulation of EGFR protein stability greatly contributes to aberrant EGFR signaling and lung cancer progression [3]. To determine whether JMJD5 reduces EGFR protein level by facilitating its degradation, we examined differences in the stability of EGFR protein after changes in JMJD5 expression. Overexpression of JMJD5 in A549 (harboring WT-EGFR) or H1975 (harboring L858R/T790M double mutations) cells decreased the half-life of EGFR with or without EGF induction (Fig. 4A–D). By contrast, depletion of JMJD5 prolonged the half-life of EGFR (Fig. S3A, B). To further clarify whether JMJD5 affects EGFR stability through proteasome or lysosome pathway, we treated cells with proteasome inhibitor MG132 or lysosome inhibitor chloroquine (CQ). Consistent with prior reports [13, 35, 36], in the absence of EGF induction, the degradation of EGFR protein proceeds primarily through the proteasome pathway, while following EGF stimulation, the EGFR protein was rapidly destabilized mainly through the lysosome pathway (Fig. S3C, D). The decrease of EGFR level caused by JMJD5 overexpression can be effectively reversed by MG132 but not by CQ, suggesting that proteasome-mediated degradation is the primary cause of JMJD5-induced EGFR level decline (Figs. 4E, F, S3E). Accordingly, overexpression of JMJD5 reduced EGFR colocalization with the early endosomal marker EEA-1, the recycling endosome marker RAB11, and the lysosomal degradation marker LAMP-1, indicating that JMJD5 downregulated EGFR expression, thereby compromising EGF-induced EGFR endocytosis and subsequent intracellular sorting (Fig. 4G). The reduced colocalization of EGFR with EEA1 after JMJD5 overexpression was rescued in the presence of MG132 (Fig. S3F). Moreover, ectopic expression of wild-type JMJD5 and its catalytically inactive mutant remarkably increased Lys 48 (K48)-linked, but not Lys 63-linked, polyubiquitin chains of EGFR protein (Fig. 4H). Notably, JMJD5 also increased K48-linked ubiquitination of EGFR TKI-resistant mutants (T790M、C797S) (Fig. 4I). These results suggest that JMJD5 promotes EGFR polyubiquitination, resulting in proteasome-mediated EGFR degradation, both in WT-EGFR and its resistant mutants.
It has been reported that JMJD5 facilitates the proteasomal degradation of binding proteins by promoting its association with E3 ubiquitin ligase [15, 24]. Interestingly, when we screened the interacting proteins of JMJD5, the HECT-domain E3 ligase HUWE1 was successfully identified (Fig. S1A). Overexpression of HUWE1 decreased EGFR protein levels either in the presence or absence of EGF in A549 cells (Fig. 5A, B). Ectopic expression of HUWE1 elevated K48-linked ubiquitination of EGFR (Fig. 5C). Notably, coexpression of JMJD5 with HUWE1 further downregulated EGFR protein level and increased EGFR ubiquitination (Fig. 5B, C). Next, we investigated the role of JMJD5 and HUWE1 in EGFR destabilization. As shown in Fig. 5D, E, depletion of JMJD5 in A549 and H1975 cells restored HUWE1-medicated EGFR degradation, whereas silencing HUWE1 rescued JMJD5-enhanced EGFR downregulation, indicating that both JMJD5 and HUWE1 are required to modulate EGFR stability. Co-IP analysis showed that both the full-length and the C-terminus (3551-4370 truncate containing HECT domain) of HUWE interacted with JMJD5 and EGFR (Fig. 5F–I). Immunofluorescence analysis also revealed that there was a strong colocalization of JMJD5, HUWE1, and EGFR in cancer cells (Fig. 5J). We then detected the expression of HUWE1 in human NSCLC. Intriguingly, the mRNA (Fig. S4A) and protein (Fig. S4B) level of HUWE1 was significantly elevated in NSCLC tissues compared with the normal tissues. However, NSCLC patients with high expression of HUWE1 and JMJD5 had significantly lower EGFR protein levels than those with low JMJD5 expression (Fig. 5K), as well as correlated with a better survival rate of the disease (Fig. 5L).
JMJD5 inhibits cell proliferation, migration and promotes gefitinib-sensitivity in lung cancer cells
Our aforementioned results showed that JMJD5 negatively regulates EGFR stability, therefore, we further investigated the effects of JMJD5 on cell proliferation and tumor growth. The results showed that JMJD5 expression markedly suppressed cell proliferation (Fig. 6A, B) and migration (Fig. 6C) in A549 and H1975 cells, while silencing JMJD5 significantly promoted these events (Fig. 6D–G). Simultaneous depletion of EGFR effectively rescued JMJD5 knockdown-induced growth promotion, indicating that JMJD5 inhibits NSCLC cell proliferation and migration via downregulation of EGFR expression. Moreover, we also analyzed the effects of JMJD5 on the EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC. As shown in Fig. 6H, the IC50 assay showed that ectopic JMJD5 expression greatly reduced the resistance of EGFR-WT and EGFR-TKI-resistant mutant cell lines to gefitinib. In addition, JMJD5 overexpression combined with gefitinib significantly reduced EGFR expression and suppressed the growth of gefitinib-resistant NSCLC in xenograft mouse models (Fig. 6I, J, Fig. S5A, B). Together, these data support that JMJD5 inhibits cell growth and migration by reducing EGFR expression, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to gefitinib.
Exosomal JMJD5 protein suppresses NSCLC growth as a potential therapeutic strategy
We have previously reported that JMJD5 is downregulated in malignant effusions [33], however, its underlying secretion mechanism remains unclear. Since JMJD5 lacks a typical secretion signal, we analyzed the expression of JMJD5 in exosomes in the supernatant of lung cancer cells. As shown in Fig. 7A, B, electron microscopy showed that exosomes were round vesicles with intact membrane structures, and nanoparticle tracking analysis indicated the size of the exosomes to be in a range of 50–150 nm. Western blotting further confirmed the expression of exosome-positive marker ALIX, TSG101, CD63, and negative marker calnexin in our exosome preparations, indicating successful isolation of exosomes (Fig. 7C). The results showed that JMJD5 was expressed in exosomes derived from H1975 cells, and overexpression of JMJD5 could significantly increase its exosomal enrichment. Intriguingly, ectopic expression of JMJD5 also significantly inhibited EGFR expression in exosomes.
Then we investigated whether exosomal JMJD5 (exo-JMJD5) could be transferred to recipient cells. The PKH67-labeled exosomes were incubated with recipient cells, and the cellular uptake of exosomes and subsequent upregulation of JMJD5 were confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and western blotting (Fig. 7D, E). Next, we measured the biological function of exo-JMJD5 in NSCLC cell lines with WT or mutant EGFR. We treated A549 and H1975 cells with exosome-containing conditioned medium or isolated exosomes. As shown in Fig. 7F–I, colony formation and transwell assay analysis revealed that cell proliferation and cell migration were significantly decreased after treatment. We further examined the effects of exo-JMJD5 on xenograft tumor growth. The third-generation EGFR TKI AZD9291, which can overcome T790M-mediated TKI resistance, significantly suppressed the tumor growth in H1975 xenografts, but had a weak effect on A549 xenograft tumors. In contrast, exo-JMJD5 or JMJD5 overexpression inhibited the tumor growth of both xenografts (Fig. 7J, K). Altogether, these results support that exo-JMJD5 inhibits NSCLC growth and can be used as a potential therapeutic strategy.
Discussion
Targeted EGFR therapeutics such as TKIs significantly relieve the development of mutant EGFR-driven NSCLC; however, the emergence of acquired resistance is a challenging issue for TKI therapies [6]. Meanwhile, WT-EGFR also performs an essential role in EGFR TKI resistance and NSCLC progression [7,8,9]. Therefore, it is of great importance to develop new strategies targeting both mutant EGFR and WT-EGFR to overcome therapeutic resistance. It has been reported that EGFR protein stability is tightly controlled through multisite ubiquitination and association with different E3 ubiquitin ligases [3, 37]. Upon EGF stimulation, E3 ligase c-Cbl catalyzes EGFR ubiquitination for subsequent lysosomal degradation [38], whereas F-box protein FBXL2 and E3 ligase CHIP target EGFR for proteasome-mediated degradation [13, 39]. In contrast, E3 ligases SMURF2 and WWP1 have been reported to interact with EGFR to enhance its ubiquitination and stability [12, 40]. In this study, we showed that JMJD5 cooperates with E3 ligase HUWE1 to destabilize EGFR and inhibit its signaling activity through proteasome degradation, not only for the WT-EGFR but also for the activating and gatekeeper mutants. Overexpression of JMJD5, therefore, significantly inhibits NSCLC cell growth and promotes the sensitivity of cells to EGFR TKI.
Unlike most other members of the JMJD family, which have additional DNA or protein-binding domains, JMJD5 contains the enzymatic JmjC domain only and belongs to the evolutionarily separated small JMJD subgroup which has more diverse functions other than regulating histone methylation [41]. Intriguingly, JMJD5 has been reported to influence important biological processes by promoting proteasomal degradation of key proteins, such as negatively regulating osteoclastogenesis through facilitating the degradation of transcription factor NFATC1 and modulating circadian rhythms via destabilizing the essential oscillator repressor CRY1 [15, 24]. In the current study, we demonstrate for the first time that JMJD5 acts as a crucial nexus to promote EGFR proteasomal degradation by recruiting E3 ligase HUWE1 and therefore also plays a critical role in tumorigenesis. Moreover, the interaction between JMJD5 and EGFR is not affected by EGFR mutations, either EGFR-activating mutations (L858R or 19del) or EGFR-TKI-resistant mutations (EGFR T790M or C797S). Our results support the notion that JMJD5 is a tumor suppressor in NSCLC through downregulating both WT and mutant EGFR, thereby inhibiting EGFR downstream signaling pathways and suppressing tumor growth. On the other hand, although our results revealed that there was no difference between the wild-type and the catalytically inactive mutant of JMJD5 in promoting EGFR ubiquitination, the JMJD5 mutant still had a slightly weaker effect on EGFR downregulation compared with the wild-type. Whether JMJD5 could regulate EGFR expression in both enzymatic activity-dependent and independent manner warrants further investigation.
The HECT-domain E3 ligase HUWE1 catalyzes ubiquitination of a diverse complement of key proteins such as p53, Myc, and Mcl-1, implicating that it is involved in the regulation of numerous cellular processes including cell proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, and stress response [42]. Since some HUWE1 substrates are oncoproteins and others are tumor suppressors, HUWE1 can be either oncogenic or tumor suppressing, mainly depending on the leading substrates it regulates in the context. Meanwhile, although HUWE1 has been reported to mediate EGFR ubiquitination and degradation in renal fibrosis inhibition [43], their association in cancer remains unclear. It has been reported that HUWE1 is overexpressed in lung cancer and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by targeting p53 and the RAC activator TIAM1 for proteasomal degradation [44, 45]. Our current results on the negative regulation of EGFR stability through the cooperation of HUWE1 and JMJD5 provide further insight into the complex role of HUWE1 in lung cancer progression. Since E3 ligase typically targets multiple substrates under different temporal and spatial conditions, its associated regulatory proteins may perform a critical role in determining the leading substrate and ultimate biological effects. Notably, although HUWE1 is upregulated in NSCLC tissues, EGFR protein levels are significantly reduced in patients with high JMJD5 expression and are correlated with better survival of the disease. These findings further support the importance of JMJD5 in regulating the HUWE1/EGFR axis.
Recent studies have found that exosomes or extracellular vehicles (EVs) are closely associated with cancer progression, diagnosis, and treatment [46, 47]. Due to their natural delivery ability, exosomes can be taken up by cells and stably transfer drugs, such as therapeutic miRNAs and proteins. Exosomal incorporation of tumor suppressors, such as miRNA let-7a and p53 protein, has been reported to promote cancer cell apoptosis and inhibit tumor development [48, 49]. In this study, we demonstrated that JMJD5 protein can be packaged into exosomes and delivered to the recipient cells to suppress NSCLC cell proliferation, migration, and xenograft tumor growth. Hence, it is likely that augmenting the expression level of JMJD5 in tumor cells through the uptake of exosomes, subsequently facilitating the degradation of intracellular EGFR, represents a novel tumor-suppressive mechanism of JMJD5. Moreover, our results showed that enhanced JMJD5 expression also significantly inhibits the exosomal enrichment of EGFR, likely due to its promotion of intracellular degradation of this protein. Since EGFR per se acts as a major cargo of EVs and contributes to tumor metastasis, angiogenesis, and TKI resistance [3], exosomal delivery of JMJD5 may represent a putative strategy for EGFR-targeted therapy of NSCLC.
In summary, our finding demonstrates that JMJD5 negatively regulates EGFR expression and signal activation by facilitating HUWE1-mediated EGFR degradation. Enhancing the expression and exosomal transferring of JMJD5 to accelerate EGFR degradation, therefore, is a potential therapeutic option for the treatment of TKI-resistant NSCLC.
Data availability
The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Arteaga CL, Engelman JA. ERBB receptors: from oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:282–303.
Devarakonda S, Morgensztern D, Govindan R. Genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e342–351.
Levantini E, Maroni G, Del Re M, Tenen DG. EGFR signaling pathway as therapeutic target in human cancers. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;85:253–75.
Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Nature. 2018;553:446–54.
Hirsch FR, Scagliotti GV, Mulshine JL, Kwon R, Curran WJ Jr, Wu YL, et al. Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments. Lancet. 2017;389:299–311.
Passaro A, Janne PA, Mok T, Peters S. Overcoming therapy resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:377–91.
Kruspig B, Monteverde T, Neidler S, Hock A, Kerr E, Nixon C, et al. The ERBB network facilitates KRAS-driven lung tumorigenesis. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaao2565.
Nukaga S, Yasuda H, Tsuchihara K, Hamamoto J, Masuzawa K, Kawada I, et al. Amplification of EGFR wild-type alleles in non-small cell lung cancer cells confers acquired resistance to mutation-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2078–89.
Wu S, Luo M, To KKW, Zhang J, Su C, Zhang H, et al. Intercellular transfer of exosomal wild type EGFR triggers osimertinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:17.
Pinilla-Macua I, Grassart A, Duvvuri U, Watkins SC, Sorkin A. EGF receptor signaling, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and endocytosis in tumors in vivo. eLife. 2017;6:e31993.
Maity TK, Venugopalan A, Linnoila I, Cultraro CM, Giannakou A, Nemati R, et al. Loss of MIG6 accelerates initiation and progression of mutant epidermal growth factor receptor-driven lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:534–49.
Yu JJ, Zhou DD, Yang XX, Cui B, Tan FW, Wang J, et al. TRIB3-EGFR interaction promotes lung cancer progression and defines a therapeutic target. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3660.
Niu M, Xu J, Liu Y, Li Y, He T, Ding L, et al. FBXL2 counteracts Grp94 to destabilize EGFR and inhibit EGFR-driven NSCLC growth. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5919.
Hsia DA, Tepper CG, Pochampalli MR, Hsia EY, Izumiya C, Huerta SB, et al. KDM8, a H3K36me2 histone demethylase that acts in the cyclin A1 coding region to regulate cancer cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:9671–6.
Youn MY, Yokoyama A, Fujiyama-Nakamura S, Ohtake F, Minehata K, Yasuda H, et al. JMJD5, a Jumonji C (JmjC) domain-containing protein, negatively regulates osteoclastogenesis by facilitating NFATc1 protein degradation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:12994–3004.
Wilkins SE, Islam MS, Gannon JM, Markolovic S, Hopkinson RJ, Ge W, et al. JMJD5 is a human arginyl C-3 hydroxylase. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1180.
Shen J, Xiang X, Chen L, Wang H, Wu L, Sun Y, et al. JMJD5 cleaves monomethylated histone H3 N-tail under DNA damaging stress. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:2131–43.
Liu H, Wang C, Lee S, Deng Y, Wither M, Oh S, et al. Clipping of arginine-methylated histone tails by JMJD5 and JMJD7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E7717–E7726.
Ishimura A, Minehata K, Terashima M, Kondoh G, Hara T, Suzuki T. Jmjd5, an H3K36me2 histone demethylase, modulates embryonic cell proliferation through the regulation of Cdkn1a expression. Development. 2012;139:749–59.
Oh S, Janknecht R. Histone demethylase JMJD5 is essential for embryonic development. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. 2012;420:61–65.
Jones MA, Covington MF, DiTacchio L, Vollmers C, Panda S, Harmer SL. Jumonji domain protein JMJD5 functions in both the plant and human circadian systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:21623–8.
Shalaby NA, Pinzon JH, Narayanan AS, Jin EJ, Ritz MP, Dove RJ, et al. JmjC domain proteins modulate circadian behaviors and sleep in Drosophila. Sci Rep. 2018;8:815.
Zhu H, Hu S, Baker J. JMJD5 regulates cell cycle and pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32:2098–110.
Saran AR, Kalinowska D, Oh S, Janknecht R, DiTacchio L. JMJD5 links CRY1 function and proteasomal degradation. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2006145.
Wang HJ, Hsieh YJ, Cheng WC, Lin CP, Lin YS, Yang SF, et al. JMJD5 regulates PKM2 nuclear translocation and reprograms HIF-1alpha-mediated glucose metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:279–84.
Schoepflin ZR, Silagi ES, Shapiro IM, Risbud MV. PHD3 is a transcriptional coactivator of HIF-1alpha in nucleus pulposus cells independent of the PKM2-JMJD5 axis. FASEB J. 2017;31:3831–47.
Wang HJ, Pochampalli M, Wang LY, Zou JX, Li PS, Hsu SC, et al. KDM8/JMJD5 as a dual coactivator of AR and PKM2 integrates AR/EZH2 network and tumor metabolism in CRPC. Oncogene. 2019;38:17–32.
Zhao Z, Sun C, Li F, Han J, Li X, Song Z. Overexpression of histone demethylase JMJD5 promotes metastasis and indicates a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:10325–34.
Yao Y, Zhou WY, He RX. Down-regulation of JMJD5 suppresses metastasis and induces apoptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma by regulating p53/NF-kappaB pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;109:1994–2004.
Yang CY, Tsao CH, Hsieh CC, Lin CK, Lin CS, Li YH, et al. Downregulation of Jumonji-C domain-containing protein 5 inhibits proliferation by silibinin in the oral cancer PDTX model. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236101.
Qu LH, Fang Q, Yin T, Yi HM, Mei GB, Hong ZZ, et al. Comprehensive analyses of prognostic biomarkers and immune infiltrates among histone lysine demethylases (KDMs) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71:2449–67.
Wang H, Wang J, Liu J, Wang Y, Xia G, Huang X. Jumonji-C domain-containing protein 5 suppresses proliferation and aerobic glycolysis in pancreatic cancer cells in a c-Myc-dependent manner. Cell Signal. 2022;93:110282.
Wang Z, Wang C, Huang X, Shen Y, Shen J, Ying K. Differential proteome profiling of pleural effusions from lung cancer and benign inflammatory disease patients. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1824:692–700.
Huang X, Zhang S, Qi H, Wang Z, Chen HW, Shao J, et al. JMJD5 interacts with p53 and negatively regulates p53 function in control of cell cycle and proliferation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853:2286–95.
Levkowitz G, Waterman H, Ettenberg SA, Katz M, Tsygankov AY, Alroy I, et al. Ubiquitin ligase activity and tyrosine phosphorylation underlie suppression of growth factor signaling by c-Cbl/Sli-1. Mol Cell. 1999;4:1029–40.
Huang F, Kirkpatrick D, Jiang X, Gygi S, Sorkin A. Differential regulation of EGF receptor internalization and degradation by multiubiquitination within the kinase domain. Mol Cell. 2006;21:737–48.
Tong J, Taylor P, Moran MF. Proteomic analysis of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) interactome and post-translational modifications associated with receptor endocytosis in response to EGF and stress. Mol Cell Proteom. 2014;13:1644–58.
de Melker AA, van der Horst G, Calafat J, Jansen H, Borst J. c-Cbl ubiquitinates the EGF receptor at the plasma membrane and remains receptor associated throughout the endocytic route. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:2167–78.
Hou J, Deng Q, Zhou J, Zou J, Zhang Y, Tan P, et al. CSN6 controls the proliferation and metastasis of glioblastoma by CHIP-mediated degradation of EGFR. Oncogene. 2017;36:1134–44.
Ray D, Ahsan A, Helman A, Chen G, Hegde A, Gurjar SR, et al. Regulation of EGFR protein stability by the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase SMURF2. Neoplasia. 2011;13:570–8.
Oh S, Shin S, Janknecht R. The small members of the JMJD protein family: enzymatic jewels or jinxes? Biochimica et biophysica acta. Rev Cancer. 2019;1871:406–18.
Kao SH, Wu HT, Wu KJ. Ubiquitination by HUWE1 in tumorigenesis and beyond. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25:67.
Zhu Q, Dong H, Bukhari AA, Zhao A, Li M, Sun Y, et al. HUWE1 promotes EGFR ubiquitination and degradation to protect against renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. FASEB J. 2020;34:4591–601.
Yang D, Cheng D, Tu Q, Yang H, Sun B, Yan L, et al. HUWE1 controls the development of non-small cell lung cancer through down-regulation of p53. Theranostics. 2018;8:3517–29.
Vaughan L, Tan CT, Chapman A, Nonaka D, Mack NA, Smith D, et al. HUWE1 ubiquitylates and degrades the RAC activator TIAM1 promoting cell-cell adhesion disassembly, migration, and invasion. Cell Rep. 2015;10:88–102.
Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367:eaau6977.
Dai J, Su Y, Zhong S, Cong L, Liu B, Yang J, et al. Exosomes: key players in cancer and potential therapeutic strategy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:145.
Ohno S, Takanashi M, Sudo K, Ueda S, Ishikawa A, Matsuyama N, et al. Systemically injected exosomes targeted to EGFR deliver antitumor microRNA to breast cancer cells. Mol Ther. 2013;21:185–91.
Wang Q, Yu J, Kadungure T, Beyene J, Zhang H, Lu Q. ARMMs as a versatile platform for intracellular delivery of macromolecules. Nat Commun. 2018;9:960.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY20H160040) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772919). We thank Professor Wei Liu and Hai Song from Zhejiang University and Professor Genze Shao from Peking University for sharing the plasmids.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JShen and HQ conceived and designed the study. GL, XX, and HQ performed experiments and validated the results. GL wrote the original draft of the manuscript. JShen, JShao, and HQ revised the manuscript. JShen provided overall guidance and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Dr Angelo Peschiaroli
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, J., Liu, G., Qi, H. et al. JMJD5 inhibits lung cancer progression by facilitating EGFR proteasomal degradation. Cell Death Dis 14, 657 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06194-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06194-0
- Springer Nature Limited