Abstract
Copy number variations (CNVs) play a vital role in regulating genes expression and tumorigenesis. We explored the copy number alterations in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma using high-throughput sequencing and nucleic acid flight mass spectrometry technology, and found that 8q22.1-22.2 is frequently amplified in lung adenocarcinoma tissues. COX6C localizes on the region and its expression is notably enhanced that driven by amplification in lung adenocarcinoma. Knockdown of COX6C significantly inhibits the cell proliferation, and induces S-G2/M cell cycle arrest, mitosis deficiency and apoptosis. Moreover, COX6C depletion causes a deficiency in mitochondrial fusion, and impairment of oxidative phosphorylation. Mechanistically, COX6C-induced mitochondrial deficiency stimulates ROS accumulation and activates AMPK pathway, then leading to abnormality in spindle formation and chromosome segregation, activating spindle assemble checkpoint, causing mitotic arrest, and ultimately inducing cell apoptosis. Collectively, we suggested that copy amplification-mediated COX6C upregulation might serves as a prospective biomarker for prognosis and targeting therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Despite great advances in understanding of tumorigenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic option, lung cancer remains one of the most common malignant cancers in the world and the leading cause of cancer-related death [1]. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the main subtype accounting for ~40% of all cases of lung cancer. Patients with advanced LUAD were predicted worse prognosis, and the five years survival of them was estimated to be only about 15% [2]. Thus, identification and determination of new candidate genes involved in LUAD tumorigenesis would be beneficial to develop available and efficient strategy for diagnosis and therapy of LUAD.
DNA aberrations, including mutations, translocations, inversions and copy number variations (CNVs), are common and display crucial roles in promoting tumor progression. CNVs refer to a form of genomic structural variations that lead to abnormal gene copy numbers, including gene amplification, gain, loss and deletion. Previous studies found that tumor suppressors are often enriched in deleted CNVs, while oncogenes are enriched in gain or amplification CNVs [3]. For example, multiple known oncogenes, including erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Myc and CCND1, are frequently amplified, and several known tumor suppressor genes, such as cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and Rb, are often depleted in different types of tumors [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Therefore, given the direct value of CNVs on gene expression, it is necessary to explore high frequency of CNVs and illuminate the critical genes function in LUAD tumorigenesis.
In this study, we analyzed the specific aberrant CNVs in early-stage LUAD tissues by using whole-genome sequencing and nucleic acid flight mass spectrometry technology, and concentrated to investigate the role of Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6C (COX6C), a gene of mitochondrial electron transport chain frequently amplified in LUAD. We found that COX6C was overexpressed in LUAD tissues, and COX6C knockdown (KD) caused mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS accumulation, then activated AMPK signaling pathway and suppressed cell proliferation via modulating mitotic progression.
Materials
Patients and LUAD tissues samples
DNA extracted from 38 paired tumor and normal tissues, as well as 10 pneumonia samples were sent for NGS. The tissue microarray (TMA) was prepared by Kunshan Huayi Biotechnology (Kunshan, China), which contained paired tumor tissues and adjacent non-cancerous tissues from 145 cases LUAD patients. In addition, paired tumor and normal tissues from 40 LUAD patients were used to evaluate the expression of COX6C mRNA and protein. All of patients were enrolled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou, China) with informed consent, as approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-ky-50).
Verification of copy number amplification sequences by MALDI-TOF MS
The copy number of 8q22.1-22.2 and COX6C were verified by MALDI-TOF MS as previous reported [11]. SNP sites with high allele frequency were selected for iPLEX assay design (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). SNP allelotyping was performed by MassARRAY Analyzer 4 with CPM (Agena Biosciences, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The ratio of the peak area of the two alleles in the heterozygous sample (AR) was calculated as follows: AR = area of high molecular weight allele/area of low molecular weight allele. Due to AR for each SNP within two balanced alleles were not always equal to one, we used Z-score to identify CNVs. AR of healthy individuals with normal copy number was used as reference. The mean AR ratio (ARref) and standard deviation of reference (SDref) were calculated, and then the Z-score of each sample with ARsample (normal or tumor tissue) was calculated as follows: Z = (ARsample - ARref)/SDref.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
IHC assays were performed as previously described [12]. Briefly, TMA slide was dewaxed with xylene, and then hydrated by washing with a graded ethanol series and distilled water. The slide was stained with mouse anti-COX6C antibody (1:20 dilution) at 4 °C for 12 h after antigen retrieval and blocking, and then were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies at room temperature for 30 min. Signal was revealed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (3,3′-DAB), and counterstained with hematoxylin. Each tissue was captured using Nikon light microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ci, Tokyo, Japan). The staining intensity of COX6C was scored via IHC Profiler plugin in Image J. The investigator was blinded to the samples during the experiment.
siRNAs and antibodies
Nonsense control siRNA (siNC: 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTTT-3′) and siRNAs specific targeting to COX6C (si-1: 5′-GCGAAAUCAUAUGGCUGUATT-3′, si-2: 5′-GAAACUACGAUGUCAUGAATT-3′) were synthesized by Genepharma (Shanghai, China).
Mouse anti-COX6C antibody (ab110267), mouse anti-mfn1 antibody (ab126575), mouse anti-mfn2 antibody (ab56889), mouse anti-GRP75 antibody (ab2799), rabbit anti-TOM70 antibody (ab289977), rabbit anti-TOM40 antibody (ab185543) and rabbit anti-TOM20 antibody (ab186735) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Rabbit anti-cyclin B1 antibodies (55004-1-AP) and mouse anti-PARP-1 antibody (66520-1-Ig) were purchased from Proteintech (Rosemont, USA). Mouse anti-α-Tubulin antibody (T5168) and rabbit anti-β-actin antibody (SAB5600204) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Billerica, USA). Rabbit anti-cyclin A2 antibody (67955), rabbit anti-cyclin D1 antibody (55506), rabbit anti-CDK2 antibody (18048), rabbit anti-pH3S10 antibodies (9701), rabbit anti-cleaved caspase 7 antibody (8438), rabbit anti-VDAC antibody (4661), rabbit anti-phospho-Aurora A antibody (3079), rabbit anti-phospho-P70 antibody (97596), rabbit anti-P70 antibody (5707), rabbit anti-phospho-AMPK antibody (2535) and rabbit anti-AMPK antibody (5831) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, USA). Mouse anti-Aurora A antibody (610939) and mouse anti-BubR1 antibody (612502) were purchased from BD biosciences (California, USA). Human anti-CREST antibody (HCT-0100) was purchased from ImmunoVision. All secondary antibodies were obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Massachusetts, USA).
Cell culture, transfection, and drug treatment
LUAD cells and Beas-2b cells were provided by Dr. Haishang Huang of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou, China) and were characterized by DNA fingerprinting and isozyme detection. Beas-2b, H1299, and H1975 were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, California, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco). A549 cells were cultured in Ham’s F12K medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS. HCC-827 cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS. All cells were cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2. siRNAs and plasmids transfection were conducted with Lipofectamine 3000 (L3000015, Life Technologies Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
For Compound C (C.C, HY-13418, MedChemExpress, New Jersey, USA) or Trolox (T1710, Topscience, Shanghai, China) treatment, cells were firstly pretreated with 1 μM C.C for 0.5 h or 400 μM Trolox for 1 h. After siRNA transfection, cells were incubated with medium containing C.C or Trolox for 72 h.
Construction of stably transfected cell lines
pLKO.1-TRC-copGFP-2A-PURO vector and pLKO.1-TRC-copGFP-2A-PURO-shCOX6C were purchased from Tsingke (Beijing, China). All of the lentivirus vectors were packaged in 293T cells with the psPAX2 and pMD2.G packaging vectors. Lentiviruses were used to infect H1299 cells. Stably transfected cell lines were selected by puromycin for two days. Each shRNA shares the same core sequence with corresponding siRNA.
For establishment the H1299 cells stably expressed Mito-DsRed, pDsRed2-Mito vector was transfected with Lipofectamine 3000, and the cells were selected with neomycin for ten days and cell clones expressing DsRed2 were obtained.
Immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, and mitotic defects analyses
Cells were harvested or fixed for immunoblotting or immunofluorescence analysis as previously described [12]. In brief, for immunoblotting, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and equal amounts of total protein lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Immunoblot analysis was performed with corresponding antibodies. For immunofluorescence analysis, cells cultured on glass coverslips were fixed and immunostained with indicated antibodies followed by corresponding secondary antibodies. Images were captured using a Nikon confocal microscope (Nikon A1, Tokyo, Japan).
For mitotic cells counting, at least 2200 cells were analyzed per experiment, and among them, at least 120 mitotic cells were observed and analyzed by their condensed DNA and spindle structure. Mitotic index was calculated as following formula: Mitotic index (%) = number of mitotic cells/number of total cells × 100; the ratio of cell number in each mitotic phase or early mitosis relative to total mitotic cells, the ratio of cells with multipolar spindle in early mitotic cells, the ratio of cells with lagging chromosome in late mitotic cells and the ratio of multinuclear cells in total cells were also calculated.
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR assays were performed as previously described [12]. One microgram RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and qPCR was performed on a Biorad CFX 96 Touch using SYBR Green (TIANGEN BIOTECH, Beijing, China) as a dsDNA-specific fluorescent dye. β-actin was used for standardizing indicated mRNA level. Amplification primers were synthesized as follow: 5′-GGCGTCTGCGAAATCAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CAGCCTTCCTCATCTCCTC-3′ (reverse) for COX6C, 5′-TGCGTTACACCCTTTCTTGACA-3′ (forward) and 5′- GCAAGGGACTTCCTGTAACAATG-3′ (reverse) for β-actin, 5′-GGGGCAGCGGCGTAAGAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCTTCTCGGTCTCGGACAAAA-3′ (reverse) for SOX2, 5′-GCTCACCCTGGGCGTTCT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CATTGTTGTCGGCTTCCTCC-3′ (reverse) for OCT4, 5′-GCTCCGCTCCATAACTTCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGGCTTGTGGGGTGCTAAA-3′ (reverse) for Nanong. Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Cell proliferation, colony formation, cell cycle analysis, and apoptosis assay
COX6C stably knockdown cells or control cells were seeded on 24-well plates (7000 cell per well), or H1299 or H1975 were seeded on 48-well plates (3000 cell per well) for 24 h and transfected with indicated siRNA. The cells proliferation was determined using cell counting chamber. Colony formation, cell cycle analysis and apoptosis assay were performed as previously described [12].
Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) assay
MMP assay was carried out by using enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with JC-1 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Cells transfected with indicated siRNA were incubated with JC-1 solution for 20 min at 37 °C. Then, the cells were rinsed twice using JC-1 buffer. Images were captured using a NIKON confocal microscope. The ratio of red to green fluorescence represented the MMP. Fluorescence intensity was measured by Image J.
Intracellular ROS assay
Detection of intracellular ROS was carried out by using Reactive Oxygen Species Assay Kit (Beyotime). Cells transfected with siRNA were incubated with 10 μM H2DCFDA for 20 min at 37 °C. Then the cells were rinsed twice using serum-free cell culture solution, and applied for flow cytometry using Beckman CytoFLEX (Beckman, California, USA) immediately. Relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) of H2DCFDA was determined as a ratio of the detected fluorescence signals of experimental treatment groups to control groups.
Determination of mitochondrial ROS
Detection of mitochondrial ROS was carried out by using MitoSox Red Kit (HY-D1055, MedChemExpress). Cells transfected with siRNA were incubated with 10 μM MitoSox Red for 30 min at room temperature. Then the cells were rinsed twice using serum-free cell culture solution, and images were captured using a NIKON confocal microscope immediately. The fluorescent intensity relative to total cells was calculated and RFI was determined as a ratio of the fluorescence signals of experimental treatment groups to control groups.
Determination of oxygen consumption rate (OCR)
The OCR was determined using an oxygen electrode system Oxygraph-2k (Oroboros, Innsbruck, Austria). The cells were harvested from 6 cm dish and washed with TDS (25 mM Tris-base, 137 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 0.7 mM Na2HPO4, 10% serum, pH 7.4–7.5) and then centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min. The cells were resuspended in TD (25 mM Tris-base, 137 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 0.7 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4–7.5) and added to the test chamber to record the basal respiratory oxygen consumption. ATP production and maximal oxygen consumption rate were calculated in response to oligomycin (1 μL, 0.1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) and trifluoromethoxy carbonylcyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP, 1 μL, 0.1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. All values were normalized by cell numbers.
Determination of mitochondrial length
H1299 cells stably expressing DsRed2-Mito were transfected with indicated siRNAs for 72 h. The cells were fixed and stained with DAPI. Images were taken by NIKON confocal microscope. The mitochondrial length in at least 28 cells of each treatment was measured via MiNA-2.0.0 plugin in Image J.
Transmission electron microscopy
COX6C KD and control H1299 cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (A600875, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) for 2 h at room temperature. After wash, samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Spi-Chem, West Chester, USA) at 4 °C for 2 h, and dehydrated with a grade series of ethanol. Samples were infiltrated, embedded in Epon-Araldite Resin (Spi-Chem), and polymerized at 60 °C for 48 h. Ultrathin sections of 70 nm were prepared, and then were stained with 3% uranyl acetate and 2.7% lead citrate. Samples were observed with a HT7800 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Ltd. Tokyo, Japanese). Mitochondrial length was analyzed by Image J.
Tumor growth assay in vivo
Animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Medical University. 5- to 6-weeks-old male BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Vital River Laboratories (Beijing, China). The mice were randomly grouped and three 7 × 106 COX6C stably knockdown cells or control cells were hypodermic injected into the flank of each mouse (each group n = 6). Tumors were measured per three days using a vernier caliper, and tumor volume (V) was calculated using the equation V = 1/2ab2, where a and b represent the length and width respectively. The investigator was blinded to the group allocation of the animals.
Statistical analysis
All the statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad Software, California, USA) and SPSS 20.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Data are presented as the means ± standard deviations from at least 3 independent experiments. Paired student t-test was used to assess the significance of COX6C staining in cancers and their coupled adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Chi-square test was performed to evaluate the association between COX6C expression and clinicopathological parameters. Two-sided student t-test was used to analyze the difference between two groups. P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
Copy numbers of several chromosomal segments are commonly amplified in early-stage LUAD tissues
To elucidate the roles of CNVs in LUAD carcinogenesis, we enrolled 38 cases with early-stage LUAD and 10 cases with pneumonia, and analyzed the abnormalities of copy number in tumor tissues by low-depth whole-genome sequencing. Compared to DNA from pneumonia samples, multiple genomic regions with increased copy number at different extent in LUAD tissues were observed (Fig. 1A). Among them, the copy number of 5p15.33 (Chr 5: 700,021-865,026), 7p11.2 (Chr 7: 54,759,673-55,569,668), 8q22.1-22.2 (Chr 8: 97,728,091-98,103,056) and 8q24.21 (Chr 8: 128,940,154-129,870,067) were separately increased in 17, 13, 12 or 11 of 38 tumor tissues (Fig. 1B). The amplification of 5p15.33, 7p11.2 and 8q24.21 has been reported to be associated with multiple types of cancers [13,14,15,16], whereas the role of 8q22.1-22.2 multiplication in cancer was poor investigated. We further validated the amplification of 8q22.1-22.2 using Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), a previous reported method used for CNVs analysis (Fig. 1C) [11]. These results indicate that the abnormalities of gene copy number commonly exist in early-stage LUAD tissues, which are implied to be served as drivers in tumorigenesis.
COX6C is amplified and upregulated in LUAD tissues
Through examining the genes localize on or nearby 8q22.1-22.2 region, we found a gene of mitochondrial electron transport chain, COX6C (Chr 8: 99,885,000-99,890,000), is frequently amplified in various cancers by TCGA data, including LUAD (Fig. S1A). We further examined the amplification of COX6C in LUAD via MALDI-TOF MS, and confirmed that the copy number of COX6C is enhanced in early-stage LUAD tissues and H1299 LUAD cells (Fig. 2A, B). However, we cannot judge the CNVs of other LUAD cells because the SNP locuses in COX6C region are homozygous in other LUAD cells (data not shown).
We next analyzed the correlation between CNVs and COX6C expression using TCGA data (http://www.cbioportal.org/), and the data displayed that the expression of COX6C is positively correlates with its copy number in LUAD (Fig. S1B). Meanwhile, we investigated the expression of COX6C in LUAD via analyzing the data from UALCAN database (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/), and the results showed that both protein and mRNA of COX6C are significantly upregulated in LUAD (Fig. S1C, D). We further collected 40 paired LUAD tumor tissues and normal lung tissues, and compared with paired normal tissues, frequently elevated expression of COX6C was detected in tumor tissues by immunoblotting and qRT-PCR assays (Fig. 2C–F). Besides, the similar results were obtained at COX6C protein and mRNA levels in LUAD cells when compared with human bronchial epithelial cell Beas-2b (Fig. 2G, H). Altogether, these results indicate that COX6C is commonly amplified and upregulated in LUAD tissues.
COX6C knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and growth of LUAD cells
To explore the biological function(s) of COX6C in LUAD, COX6C knockdown (KD) were performed by transfection with specific siRNAs, and the results showed that siCOX6C could strikingly inhibit endogenous expression of COX6C in H1299 cells (Fig. 3A, B). Cell count and colony formation assay showed that COX6C KD significantly inhibited the cell proliferative ability of H1299 cells (Fig. 3C–E). Similar results were observed in H1975 cells and confirmed the inhibitory effect of COX6C KD on cell proliferation (Fig. S2A, B).
To investigate the effect of COX6C KD on tumor growth in vivo, stably COX6C KD cell lines were constructed using lentivirus-mediated infection, and the cells displayed an impaired proliferative ability when compared with control cells (Fig. S3A, B). Then the COX6C KD cells and control cells were injected into nude mice, unfortunately, we could not successfully constructed xenograft in nude mice using COX6C KD cells by three times attempt (Fig. S3C). We guessed that COX6C KD may involve in regulating stemness of LUAD cells, and the results showed that COX6C KD effectively inhibited sphere formation and mRNA expression of stemness-related markers including SOX2, OCT4 and Nanog (Fig. S3D–F). Collectively, our results identified that COX6C exerts a positive role in regulating tumor proliferation both in vitro and in vivo.
COX6C suppression mediates cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis in LUAD cells
To further elucidate the approach(es) of COX6C KD-induced cell proliferative suppression, we firstly analyzed the cell cycle distributions. The results showed that COX6C KD induced a strikingly increased accumulation of S-G2/M phase cells and polyploidy cells, while a significant reduction of G1 phase cells in H1299 cells (Fig. 3F, G and S3G). Accordingly, COX6C KD caused a raise of cyclin B1, cyclin A2, cyclin D1 and CDK2 expression (Fig. 3H), which suggested that COX6C KD inhibits cell proliferation via mediating cell cycle progression.
In addition, cell apoptosis was examined in COX6C KD H1299 cells. Annexin V/7-AAD staining results indicated that COX6C KD significantly elevated the proportion of annexin V-positive cells (Fig. 3I, J). Consistently, COX6C KD significantly enhanced the expression of apoptosis-related proteins including cleaved caspase 7 and cleaved PARP-1 (Fig. 3K). COX6C is a subunit of cytochrome c oxidase, which suggests that COX6C KD may cause mitochondrial dysfunction, inducing an abnormality of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). To test this possibility, we examined the MMP using JC-1 staining and observed that COX6C KD significantly reduced the level of MMP in H1299 cells (Fig. 3L, M). Therefore, these results showed that COX6C KD causes a reduction of MMP and an increase of cell apoptosis in LUAD cells.
Knockdown of COX6C induces severe mitotic defects in LUAD cells
As previous mentioned, COX6C KD resulted in an apparent increase of polyploidy cells (Fig. 3F, G and S3G). Meanwhile, we also observed more than 7% rounded cells when COX6C depleted (Fig. S4A, B). Therefore, we speculated that COX6C KD might induce a mitotic abnormity and led to cell cycle arrest. To test the speculation, immunostaining was performed to assess the mitotic progression of COX6C KD cells (Fig. 4A, B and S4C). The results showed that mitotic index was significantly increased from 4.08 ± 0.46% in siNC cells to 7.40 ± 0.34% in siCOX6C-1 cells or 6.74 ± 0.37% in siCOX6C-2 cells (Fig. 4C and Table 1). The mitotic delay was associated with an enhancement of multipolar spindle, which accompanied with abnormal chromosome congression in prometaphase, nonaligned chromosomes in metaphase, as well as chromosome bridge and lagging chromosomes in anaphase (Fig. 4A–E, S4C and Table 1). These severe mitotic defects inevitably led to activation of the spindle-assembly checkpoint (SAC) in COX6C depleted metaphase cells, as judgment by BubR1, a known component of SAC (Fig. 4F). Consistently, COX6C KD induced an accumulation of prometaphase cells and multinucleated cells, but a decrease in telophase cells (Fig. 4G–I and Table 1). Aurora kinases have been known to play critical roles in mitosis via regulating centrosomal maturation, spindle assembly, chromosome congression and segregation [17]. We found that COX6C KD significantly elevated the levels of phospho-Aurora A and the phosphorylation of H3 at Serine 10 (pH3S10), which is the preferred substrate for Aurora B (Fig. 4J) [18]. The phenotypes including increased round cells and mitotic defects were also observed in H1975 cells after COX6C KD (Fig. S5 and Table S3). Altogether, these results intensively indicate that COX6C KD induces mitotic defects in spindle assembly and chromosome congression, suppressing mitotic progression.
Depletion of COX6C elicits mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS accumulation
Given that COX6C is a subunit of cytochrome c oxidase and plays a critical role in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, it was mandatory to evaluate whether COX6C KD led to aberrance in mitochondrial metabolic functions. To evaluate whether COX6C KD causes a change in mitochondria structure, we established a H1299 cell line with stably expressed Mito-DsRed2, a discosoma red fluorescent protein fused to a mitochondrial targeting sequence [19]. Surprisedly, compared with control cells, COX6C KD triggered severe mitochondrial fragmentation in the cells, resulting in small and punctuate mitochondria and mitochondrial length decreased from 1.45 ± 0.14 μm in siNC cells to 0.86 ± 0.10 μm in siCOX6C-1 cells or 0.83 ± 0.17 μm in siCOX6C-2 cells (Fig. 5A, B). Similarly, COX6C KD also induced mitochondrial fragmentation in H1975 cells (Fig. S6A, B). We further examined the mitochondrial morphology using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the results displayed that, compared with controls, shorter mitochondria were more frequently observed in COX6C KD cells (Fig. 5C, D). Consistently, the expression of pro-fusion GTPase mfn1 was significantly decreased after COX6C KD in both H1299 and H1975 cells (Fig. 5E and S6C).
OXPHOS is one of the most important function of mitochondria and critical for cell proliferation. Therefore, we sought to explore the effects of COX6C KD on energy metabolism via measuring oxygen consumption rate (OCR), an important indicator of OXPHOS, by using Oxygraph-2k. The results showed that COX6C KD resulted in a significant decrease of OCR in basal respiration, maximal respiration and ATP turnover in H1299 cells (Fig. 5F). Besides, COX6C KD led to a significantly increase of GRP75, VDAC-1, and TOM20, but a striking decrease of TOM70 and Tom40 (Fig. 5E). Given the crucial role of mitochondria in cellular redox homeostasis, COX6C-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction also triggered a significant increase of both total cellular ROS and mitochondrial ROS production (Fig. 5G–J and S6D–G). Collectively, these results suggest that COX6C KD induces aberrancy in mitochondrial dynamics and metabolism, thereby promotes ROS accumulation and cell proliferation inhibition.
AMPK activation is responsible for COX6C-mediated cell responses
Theoretically, the decrease of ATP levels in COX6C KD cells would lead to an elevated amount of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) in cells, which has been well recognized as a prerequisite for activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [20]. To confirm this, immunoblotting was performed, and the results displayed that the phosphorylation of AMPKα1 at Threonine 172 was markedly increased when COX6C was depleted, while the phosphorylation of p70, a substrate of mTOR, was significantly decreased (Fig. 6A and S2A).
To explore whether activated AMPK serves as a downstream effector to modulate COX6C-mediated cell phenotypes, COX6C KD and control cells were cultured in presence or absence of AMPK inhibitor dorsomorphin (Compound C, C.C). The results showed that C.C treatment significantly reduced the induction of AMPK signaling in COX6C KD cells (Fig. 6B). As expected, C.C treatment effectively blocked the proliferative suppression and cell cycle arrest, and rescued cell apoptosis induced by COX6C KD in H1299 cells (Fig. 6C–E and S7A–D).
AMPK was also reported to modulate mitotic progression via phosphorylating several substrates including Kif4A and MRLC (myosin regulatory light chain) [21, 22]. Therefore, we subsequently examined the role of AMPK activation in COX6C-mediated mitotic defects. The immunofluorescence results showed that, after C.C treatment, mitotic defects induced by COX6C KD including mitotic delay, spindle abnormality, and chromosome segregation defects etc. could be significantly reversed (Fig. 6F–K, S7E and Table 2), implying that activated AMPK signaling also is required for COX6C KD induced mitotic defects. These results indicate that AMPK activation plays a vital role in COX6C KD-mediated cell proliferation inhibition, cell cycle arrest, cell apoptosis and mitotic defects in H1299 cells.
COX6C-mediated AMPK activation partially depends on mitochondrial dysfunction-induced ROS accumulation
It is well known that ROS accumulation could activate AMPK signaling pathway to regulate multiple cellular response [23]. Thus, we sought to investigate whether mitochondrial dysfunction-induced ROS accumulation after COX6C KD contributes to AMPK activation. Trolox, a ROS scavenger, significantly reduced the ROS accumulation induced by COX6C KD in H1299 cells (Fig. 7A–D). Meanwhile, the AMPK activation and cell proliferative inhibition induced by COX6C KD were partially but significantly reversed by Trolox treatment (Fig. 7E, F). In general, we clarify that COX6C KD-mediated AMPK activation is partially depend on mitochondrial dysfunction-induced ROS accumulation.
COX6C expression is positively correlated with TNM stage and worse prognosis of patients with LUAD
Given the critical role of COX6C in regulating mitochondrial functions and cell proliferation, its abnormal expression probably closely correlates with clinical cancer progression. Therefore, we further evaluated the relationship between COX6C expression and clinicopathological features of LUAD patients using a tissue cohort. Consistent with previous results, COX6C is upregulated in most tumor tissues of LUAD patients (85/143, 59.44%) (Fig. 8A–C). Results of statistical analysis showed that the expression of COX6C is positively correlated with T stage and TNM stage, but not with gender, age and N stage (Table 3). Moreover, higher COX6C expression predicts worse overall survival (OS) of LUAD patients (Fig. 8D), and the role of COX6C in prognostic prediction was further supported by worse disease-free survival (DFS) of LUAD patients with COX6C amplification (Fig. 8E). These results indicate COX6C might be a malignant biomarker used for diagnosis and prognostic prediction in LUAD.
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed the CNVs in patients with early-stage LUAD, and explored the cellular functions of a gene, COX6C, that localizes on a recurrent amplified region. We demonstrated that frequently amplified copy number and elevated expression of COX6C in a high proportion of LUAD. COX6C is essential for mitochondrial function and COX6C KD induces mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired OXPHOS and ROS accumulation, which promotes AMPK activation, inducing mitotic defects and cell proliferative inhibition (Fig. 8F).
It is well implicated that CNVs-mediated gene expression aberrations contribute to cancer progression [24, 25]. For example, CCND1, a known oncogene localizes on 11q13, is usually amplified in several types of cancer, such as breast cancer, bladder cancer, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [26,27,28]. PTEN, a tumor suppressor gene localizes on 16q23, is frequently deleted in prostate cancer, which is known as an independent prognostic marker of patients with prostate cancer [29]. Here we discovered that several gene regions including 5p15.33, 7p11.2, 8q24.21, and 8q22.1-22.2 are frequently amplified in early-stage LUAD tissues, implies that these regions may play important roles in LUAD tumorigenesis. Among them, 7p11.2 and 8q24.21 have been reported to amplify in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and genes like EGFR at 7p11.2 and myc at 8q24.21 were widely regarded as driver genes of NSCLC [30, 31]. In addition, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), a gene localizes on 5p15.33, has been found to amplify in 4.6% of anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) lung cancer patients [32]. Here, we explored the oncogenic activity of COX6C, a gene localizes on a newfound amplicon, 8q22.2, in LUAD.
COX6C is one of the most important components of the terminal enzyme of the respiratory chain, which is coded by nuclear genome and transported to inner mitochondrial membrane. It has been well known that COX6C plays a pivotal role in OXPHOS, and several evidences suggest that COX6C is closely correlated with various diseases. For example, COX6C is downregulated in blood samples from familial hypercholesterolemia patients as well as temporal and parietal cortices in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, while is significantly elevated in the glomeruli of diabetic nephropathy rats [33,34,35,36]. In addition, increased expression of COX6C was also observed in cancerous tissues from patients with prostate cancer or estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer [37, 38]. However, the mechanism of COX6C upregulation in cancers and its role in tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here, we found that COX6C is frequently amplified and its expression is positively correlated with the copy number and elevated in LUAD. COX6C promotes LUAD carcinogenesis via regulating mitochondrial function and cell cycle progression. In addition, We found COX6C is frequently overexpressed in most of tumor tissues from LUAD patients, but the amplification of COX6C is only observed in about 4.1% LUAD patients according to TCGA data. Hence, we could not eliminate that there are other possibilities contribute to increased expression of COX6C in LUAD carcinogenesis. Indeed, COX6C has been reported to be regulated by Estrogen-Related Receptor α (ERRα), NRF-1/2 or miR-4276 at transcriptional or post-transcriptional level [39,40,41,42,43]. ERR-α and NRF-1/2 have been demonstrated to participate in lung adenocarcinoma progression [44]. The role of COX6C in these factors-mediated tumorigenesis remains need to further investigation.
Mitochondria, central intracellular hubs of metabolism and redox maintenance, play a vital role in balancing oxidative stress-induced cell death and cell proliferation in cancer cells. Abnormalities in mitochondrial structure, function and dynamics would induce multiple serious consequence, such as excessed ROS accumulation [45]. ROS could irreversibly induce damage of proteins, lipids and DNA [46]. It is also well established that multiple signaling pathways, including MAPK, AKT, and AMPK, etc. could be activated responding to excessed ROS, then regulates diverse cell behaviors, such as cell cycle arrest and cell death [23, 47]. Here, we found that COX6C KD induced abnormity in mitochondrial structure and OXPHOS impairment, inducing mitotic defects and cell proliferative inhibition via activating AMPK pathway. However, ROS scavenger cannot completely reverse COX6C-mediated cell responses and AMPK activation, indicates that there are other factors may contributes to COX6C KD-induced AMPK activation.
In conclusion, we found that COX6C, a frequently amplified gene localizes to 8q22.1-22.2, is upregulated in tumor tissues and positively correlates with poorer prognosis of LUAD patients. COX6C is essential for mitochondrial function, and COX6C KD promotes ROS accumulation and activates AMPK signaling, suppressing cell proliferation via inducing mitotic defects, G2/M arrest and apoptosis, which serves COX6C as an attractive biomarker used for prognostic prediction and therapeutic target in LUAD patients.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The datasets generated in the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
Seguin L, Durandy M, Feral CC. Lung adenocarcinoma tumor origin: a guide for personalized medicine. Cancers. 2022;14:1759.
Davoli T, Xu AW, Mengwasser KE, Sack LM, Yoon JC, Park PJ, et al. Cumulative haploinsufficiency and triplosensitivity drive aneuploidy patterns and shape the cancer genome. Cell. 2013;155:948–62.
Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Kurisu W, Thor A, Chen LC, Smith HS, et al. ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5321–5.
Smith JS, Tachibana I, Passe SM, Huntley BK, Borell TJ, Iturria N, et al. PTEN mutation, EGFR amplification, and outcome in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1246–56.
Albertson DG. Gene amplification in cancer. Trends Genet. 2006;22:447–55.
Callender T, el-Naggar AK, Lee MS, Frankenthaler R, Luna MA, Batsakis JG. PRAD-1 (CCND1)/cyclin D1 oncogene amplification in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1994;74:152–8.
Illei PB, Rusch VW, Zakowski MF, Ladanyi M. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A and codeletion of the methylthioadenosine phosphorylase gene in the majority of pleural mesotheliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2108–13.
Li C, Larsson C, Futreal A, Lancaster J, Phelan C, Aspenblad U, et al. Identification of two distinct deleted regions on chromosome 13 in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 1998;16:481–7.
Meuwissen R, Linn SC, Linnoila RI, Zevenhoven J, Mooi WJ, Berns A. Induction of small cell lung cancer by somatic inactivation of both Trp53 and Rb1 in a conditional mouse model. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:181–9.
Jin S, Huang D, Jin W, Wang Y, Shao H, Gong L, et al. Detection of DNA copy number alterations by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometric analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022;60:1543–50.
Dong Z, Li J, Dai W, Yu D, Zhao Y, Liu S, et al. RRP15 deficiency induces ribosome stress to inhibit colorectal cancer proliferation and metastasis via LZTS2-mediated β-catenin suppression. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:89.
Chien HT, Cheng SD, Liao CT, Wang HM, Huang SF. Amplification of the EGFR and CCND1 are coordinated and play important roles in the progression of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Cancers. 2019;11:760.
Kachuri L, Helby J, Bojesen SE, Christiani DC, Su L, Wu X, et al. Investigation of leukocyte telomere length and genetic variants in chromosome 5p15.33 as prognostic markers in lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2019;28:1228–37.
Mandour I, Hussein SAM, Essam R, El-Hossainy MA. Study of genetic variants in chromosome 5p15.33 region in non-smoker lung cancer patients. Adv Respir Med. 2020;88:485–94.
Sanson M, Hosking FJ, Shete S, Zelenika D, Dobbins SE, Ma Y, et al. Chromosome 7p11.2 (EGFR) variation influences glioma risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:2897–904.
Cheeseman IM, Anderson S, Jwa M, Green EM, Kang J, Yates JR 3rd, et al. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell. 2002;111:163–72.
Ruchaud S, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC. Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:798–812.
Zhu P, Liu Y, Zhang F, Bai X, Chen Z, Shangguan F, et al. Human elongation factor 4 regulates cancer bioenergetics by acting as a mitochondrial translation switch. Cancer Res. 2018;78:2813–24.
Hardie DG. AMP-activated protein kinase: an energy sensor that regulates all aspects of cell function. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1895–908.
Li QR, Yan XM, Guo L, Li J, Zang Y. AMPK regulates anaphase central spindle length by phosphorylation of KIF4A. J Mol Cell Biol. 2018;10:2–17.
Thaiparambil JT, Eggers CM, Marcus AI. AMPK regulates mitotic spindle orientation through phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:3203–17.
Zhao Y, Hu X, Liu Y, Dong S, Wen Z, He W, et al. ROS signaling under metabolic stress: cross-talk between AMPK and AKT pathway. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:79.
Matsui A, Ihara T, Suda H, Mikami H, Semba K. Gene amplification: mechanisms and involvement in cancer. Biomol Concepts. 2013;4:567–82.
Giles Doran C, Pennington SR. Copy number alteration signatures as biomarkers in cancer: a review. Biomark Med. 2022;16:371–86.
Valla M, Klaestad E, Ytterhus B, Bofin AM. CCND1 amplification in breast cancer -associations with proliferation, histopathological grade, molecular subtype and prognosis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2022;27:67–77.
Zaharieva BM, Simon R, Diener PA, Ackermann D, Maurer R, Alund G, et al. High-throughput tissue microarray analysis of 11q13 gene amplification (CCND1, FGF3, FGF4, EMS1) in urinary bladder cancer. J Pathol. 2003;201:603–8.
Huang C, Yang L, Li Z, Yang J, Zhao J, Dehui X, et al. Detection of CCND1 amplification using laser capture microdissection coupled with real-time polymerase chain reaction in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2007;175:19–25.
Kluth M, Runte F, Barow P, Omari J, Abdelaziz ZM, Paustian L, et al. Concurrent deletion of 16q23 and PTEN is an independent prognostic feature in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:2354–63.
Campbell JM, Lockwood WW, Buys TP, Chari R, Coe BP, Lam S, et al. Integrative genomic and gene expression analysis of chromosome 7 identified novel oncogene loci in non-small cell lung cancer. Genome. 2008;51:1032–9.
Iwakawa R, Kohno T, Kato M, Shiraishi K, Tsuta K, Noguchi M, et al. MYC amplification as a prognostic marker of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma identified by whole genome copy number analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:1481–9.
Alidousty C, Duerbaum N, Wagener-Ryczek S, Baar T, Martelotto LG, Heydt C, et al. Prevalence and potential biological role of TERT amplifications in ALK translocated adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histopathology. 2021;78:578–85.
Wang HX, Zhao YX. Prediction of genetic risk factors of atherosclerosis using various bioinformatic tools. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15:1–9.
Lu J, Wang K, Rodova M, Esteves R, Berry D, Lezi E. et al. Polymorphic variation in cytochrome oxidase subunit genes. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21:141–54.
Kish SJ, Mastrogiacomo F, Guttman M, Furukawa Y, Taanman JW, Dozic S, et al. Decreased brain protein levels of cytochrome oxidase subunits in Alzheimer’s disease and in hereditary spinocerebellar ataxia disorders: a nonspecific change? J Neurochem. 1999;72:700–7.
Zhang Q, Xiao X, Li M, Li W, Yu M, Zhang H, et al. Telmisartan improves kidney function through inhibition of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway in diabetic rats. J Mol Endocrinol. 2012;49:35–46.
Gruvberger S, Ringner M, Chen Y, Panavally S, Saal LH, Borg A, et al. Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5979–84.
Wang FL, Wang Y, Wong WK, Liu Y, Addivinola FJ, Liang P, et al. Two differentially expressed genes in normal human prostate tissue and in carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3634–7.
Wright RM, Rosenzweig B, Poyton RO. Organization and expression of the COX6 genetic locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: multiple mRNAs with different 3’ termini are transcribed from COX6 and regulated differentially. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:1103–20.
Cunningham KF, Beeson GC, Beeson CC, Baicu CF, Zile MR, McDermott PJ. Estrogen-Related Receptor alpha (ERRalpha) is required for adaptive increases in PGC-1 isoform expression during electrically stimulated contraction of adult cardiomyocytes in sustained hypoxic conditions. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:393–400.
Dufour CR, Wilson BJ, Huss JM, Kelly DP, Alaynick WA, Downes M, et al. Genome-wide orchestration of cardiac functions by the orphan nuclear receptors ERRalpha and gamma. Cell Metab. 2007;5:345–56.
Dhar SS, Ongwijitwat S, Wong-Riley MTT. Nuclear respiratory factor 1 regulates all ten nuclear-encoded subunits of cytochrome c oxidase in neurons. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:3120–9.
Ongwijitwat S, Liang HL, Graboyes EM, Wong-Riley MT. Nuclear respiratory factor 2 senses changing cellular energy demands and its silencing down-regulates cytochrome oxidase and other target gene mRNAs. Gene. 2006;374:39–49.
Sohn EJ, Kim J, Hwang Y, Im S, Moon Y, Kang DM. TGF-beta suppresses the expression of genes related to mitochondrial function in lung A549 cells. Cell Mol Biol. 2012, Suppl.58:OL1763–1767.
Chen W, Chen X, Wang L, Yang R, Zhang W, Zhang S, et al. TIPE3 represses head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progression via triggering PGAM5 mediated mitochondria dysfunction. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:251.
Cheung EC, Vousden KH. The role of ROS in tumour development and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22:280–97.
Corcoran A, Cotter TG. Redox regulation of protein kinases. FEBS J. 2013;280:1944–65.
Acknowledgements
We thank Hezhi Fang, Haishan Huang, and Yu Zhang for kind support of materials and Yi Zheng for technical support. We also thank the Scientific Research Center of Wenzhou Medical University for consultation and instrument availability that supported this work.
Funding
This research was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China to DZX (Grant No. LY21C070004) and SFG (Grant No. LQ22H200003), National Natural Science Foundation of China to JH (Grant No. 82103184) and LH (Grant No. 32000622), and Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China to JH (Grant No. 2021JJ40720) and LH (Grant No. 2021JJ40052), Key Discipline of Zhejiang Province in Medical Technology (First Class, Category A) (Grant No. 437601607), the science and technology innovation Program of Hunan Province of China to JH (Grant No. 2022RC1165).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SL: Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing-Original draft preparation. FS: Validation, Resources, Funding acquisition. YW: Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Visualization. YZ: Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources. HY: Validation, Investigation, Resources. NZ: Investigation, Resources. NH: Writing—Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. QK: Resources, Writing—Review & Editing. HJ: Conceptualization, Writing—Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. ZD: Writing-Original draft preparation, Writing—Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All aspects of this study were approved by Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Xuzhou Medical University and Wenzhou Medical University.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Professor Stephen Tait
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Shao, F., Wang, Y. et al. COX6C expression driven by copy amplification of 8q22.2 regulates cell proliferation via mediation of mitosis by ROS-AMPK signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Dis 15, 74 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06443-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06443-w
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Enzalutamide inhibits PEX10 function and sensitizes prostate cancer cells to ROS activators
Cell Death & Disease (2024)