Abstract
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), the main stromal component of the tumor microenvironment (TME), play multifaceted roles in cancer progression through paracrine signaling, exosome transfer, and cell interactions. Attractively, recent evidence indicates that CAFs can modulate various forms of regulated cell death (RCD) in adjacent tumor cells, thus involving cancer proliferation, therapy resistance, and immune exclusion. Here, we present a brief introduction to CAFs and basic knowledge of RCD, including apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis. In addition, we further summarize the different types of RCD in tumors that are mediated by CAFs, as well as the effects of these modes of RCD on CAFs. This review will deepen our understanding of the interactions between CAFs and RCD and might offer novel therapeutic avenues for future cancer treatments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
The origins, biomarkers, and functions of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are highly heterogeneous, and diverse CAF subpopulations may exert either tumor-promoting or tumor-restrictive effects.
-
There are a number of types of regulated cell death (RCD) in tumors, and dying tumor cells play various physiological and pathological roles in regulating the tumor microenvironment (TME).
-
CAFs can modulate multiple forms of RCD in adjacent tumor cells, which has significant implications for cancer proliferation, therapeutic resistance, and immune exclusion.
-
Tumor cells undergoing different types of RCD can also regulate CAFs, thereby developing a feedback system.
Open questions
-
How can we identify the specific subtype of CAFs that promote RCD in tumor cells, as well as the specific subtypes of CAFs that inhibit RCD?
-
Tumor cells experience several forms of RCD when treated with clinical drugs, so what are the specific effects of these diverse forms of RCD on CAFs?
-
How to develop more effective therapeutic strategies that combine traditional anti-tumor medicines with CAF-targeting drugs?
Introduction
The tumor microenvironment (TME), as a complex and dynamic ecosystem composed of a set of cellular and non-cellular molecular components, plays a crucial role in tumor initiation, progression, and response to therapy [1,2,3,4,5,6]. It is well documented that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) were identified as the main stromal component in the TME and have been extensively explored in the past few years [7,8,9]. In many cancer types, CAFs exhibit distinct characteristics and behaviors that facilitate the development of tumors [10,11,12]. They can interact with tumor cells or other stromal cells via cell-cell contact, secrete numerous regulatory mediators, and remodel the structure of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [13, 14]. Clinically, CAFs are also associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of tumors and serve as potential biomarkers for diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic prediction [15,16,17]. Hence, the investigation of CAFs represents an active research for developing novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.
Regulated cell death (RCD), also known as programmed cell death, refers to the autonomous and orderly death of cells controlled by genes that eliminate unnecessary cells and maintain the stability of organismal homeostasis [18]. In the context of cancer, RCD dysfunction is a hallmark feature that contributes to the development and progression of tumor cells [19,20,21,22]. To date, ongoing research has focused on understanding the mechanisms of RCD and developing promising anticancer strategies involved in the areas of RCD [23,24,25,26]. As the field has advanced, several forms of RCD, including apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, have been identified and shown to play crucial roles in modulating the TME, making the study of RCD an attractive topic in cancer research [27,28,29].
Recently, accumulating evidence has shown that activated CAFs can regulate RCD in adjacent tumor cells, which has significant implications for cancer proliferation, therapeutic resistance, and immune exclusion. Therefore, understanding the crosstalk between CAFs and tumor cells, especially in the context of RCD, may provide new insights for improving cancer treatment outcomes. In this review, we first present a current overview of the complexity and interactions between CAFs and RCD, involving the effects of CAFs on RCD in tumor cells, as well as the impact of dying cells on CAFs. Nonetheless, for simplicity, we will only elaborate on the RCD associated with apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis in this study.
The properties of CAFs
First recognized by Virchow in 1858, Fibroblasts were identified as spindle-shaped cells in connective tissue that can secrete collagen [30]. In normal tissues, fibroblasts are mesenchyme-derived quiescent cells that are generally embedded within the fibrillar ECM. They can undergo transient activation in a context-dependent manner during processes associated with wound healing, tissue inflammation, and organ fibrosis, which plays an important role in maintaining tissue homeostasis [31, 32]. Nevertheless, repetitive damage or constant inflammation and stress could lead to continuous activation of fibroblasts [33, 34]. In cancers, this subpopulation of hyperactivated fibroblasts can be termed as CAFs [35].
According to the relevant literature, the potential cellular origins of CAFs include quiescent tissue-resident fibroblasts, bone-marrow-derived fibrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and other cells (pericytes, smooth muscle cells, and adipocytes) derived through transdifferentiation [8, 36]. However, the diverse origins of CAFs make it considerably difficult to precisely categorize a specific subgroup of CAFs. In addition to the original heterogeneity, emerging evidence illustrates that CAFs can be assessed by a combination of different biological markers. Previous studies have suggested that a number of different biomarkers, such as α-SMA, Vimentin, S100A4, FAP, PDGFRα/β, Caveolin-1 and podoplanin (PDPN), have the potential to distinguish CAFs from normal fibroblasts (NFs) [37]. Notably, these so-called biomarkers also exhibit variability across disparate tumor tissues and manifest dynamic alterations as tumors progress [38,39,40], making targeted intervention in CAFs more challenging. Therefore, precise classification strategies and efficient identification of biomarkers in CAFs require further in-depth investigation (Fig. 1).
It has long been recognized that CAFs exhibit many malignant properties when compared with NFs. Numerous publications have shown that pro-tumorigenic factors secreted by CAFs can be transferred into tumor cells through the paracrine signaling [41, 42] and the exosome-mediated pathway [43, 44], which facilitates cancer cell stemness, proliferation, and migration. As confirmed by in vitro and in vivo experiments, CAFs also stimulate tumor angiogenesis by secreting pro-angiogenic factors, such as VEGFA, CXCL12, FGF2, and PDGFC [45]. Additionally, extensive research has revealed intricate signaling pathways involved in CAF-mediated ECM/TME remodeling as well as their contributions to therapeutic resistance and immunosuppression [46,47,48]. Despite the fact that CAFs play potent pro-tumorigenic roles, some CAF subsets have been reported to have tumor-suppressive properties. For example, Ozdemir et al. revealed that the depletion of CAFs in pancreatic cancer results in the advancement of tumor cells and the suppression of the TME (a decrease in the Teff/Treg ratio and an increase in Foxp3 and Ctla4 expression) and proposed the need for caution in targeting CAFs in this kind of cancer [49]. Therefore, the impact of CAFs varies and can, in certain cases, exhibit contrasting effects on the process of carcinogenesis (Fig. 1), and a comprehensive understanding of the tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing activities of CAF subtypes may facilitate the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis and pyroptosis in brief
As the field of cell death research has advanced, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) proposed an updated definition and classification of cell death in 2018 from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives [18]. In contrast to accidental cell death (ACD), RCD is characterized by controlled signaling pathways and serves a crucial function in homeostasis maintenance and disease progression. According to its different physiological and pathological mechanisms, RCD can be further subclassified into apoptotic and non-apoptotic subcategories, such as autophagy-dependent cell death, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis [24, 27].
Currently, apoptosis is the most intensively investigated RCD and it is generally characterized by distinct morphological characteristics, including cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, membrane blebbing, and the formation of apoptotic bodies [50]. Apoptosis mainly occurs through two canonical pathways: the intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway and the extrinsic (cell death receptor) pathway. The intrinsic pathway is initiated by intracellular signals, such as DNA damage, cellular stress, and loss of survival signals, which results in the release of pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g., cytochrome c and SMAC/DIABLO) from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm and subsequently activates the caspase 9 protein [51]. The extrinsic pathway provides a rapid response to external signals, specifically tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), Fas ligand (FasL), and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), through binding to death receptors on the cell surface. Upon initiation, the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) forms, leading to the activation of caspase-8 and subsequent initiation of the caspase cascade [23].
Many studies have demonstrated that autophagy plays a fundamental role in cellular, tissue, and organismal homeostasis [52]. Based on the way intracellular materials are transported to lysosomes and the intricacies of the autophagic process, autophagy can be categorized into macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy [53]. Notably, within this classification, macroautophagy stands out as the predominant form. Autophagy initiation is mediated by the unc-51-like kinase (ULK) complex. Following the ULK complex, the autophagy-specific class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) complex forms, catalyzing the production of phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) on autophagic membranes and generating an isolated pre-autophagosomal structure called the phagosome [54]. Subsequently, the phagosome extends and seals, transforming into the autophagosome, a double-membraned vesicle encapsulating the sequestered cargo. The autophagosome then fuses with a lysosome, creating an autolysosome. Within the autolysosome, cellular component cargoes are degraded, and nutrients are recycled [55]. Thus, not surprisingly, autophagy is a dynamic and highly regulated process responsible for the degradation and recycling of cellular components via a lysosome-mediated pathway [56], and dysregulation of the autophagic network is believed to be associated with cancer development and progression [57].
Ferroptosis is distinct from the other types of RCD mentioned above. Following its identification in 2012, it has become an extensively investigated subject in the field of cancer research [26, 58, 59]. Morphologically, cells undergoing ferroptosis display distinctive mitochondrial characteristics, including mitochondrial shrinkage, increased membrane density, and decreased or absent mitochondrial cristae [60]. Mechanistically, the central biochemical and metabolic event in ferroptosis is oxidative damage to cellular membranes resulting from the abnormal accumulation of lethal lipid peroxidation products within cells [61]. The classic antioxidant network, the glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4)-reduced glutathione (GSH) system (the GPX4-GSH system), mediates cellular cysteine uptake and GSH synthesis. Under the catalytic influence of GPX4, GSH efficiently reduces accumulated phospholipid hydroperoxides (PLOOHs) and prevents ferroptosis [62]. Nevertheless, research has revealed that certain cancer cell lines maintain resistance to ferroptosis even after GPX4 inactivation, indicating the existence of additional ferroptosis defence mechanisms [26], such as the ferroptosis suppressor protein-1 (FSP1)-ubiquinone (CoQ10) system (the FSP1-CoQ10 system) [63, 64], the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH)-ubiquinol (CoQH2) system (the DHODH-CoQH2 system) [65], and the GTP cyclohydroxylase-1 (GCH1)-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) system (the GCH1-BH4 system) [66].
Research on pyroptosis, a newly described category of RCD that is dependent on Gasdermin proteins (GSDMs) [67, 68], has made further progress in recent years. As a form of lytic and pro-inflammatory type of programmed cell death, pyroptosis is mediated through two main mechanisms: canonical and noncanonical pathways. The canonical pyroptosis pathway responds to cell recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) through cytosolic pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), leading to inflammasome formation [69]. Inflammasomes then recruit proteins to activate caspase-1. Once activated, caspase-1 initiates pyroptosis by cleaving GSDMD and releasing mature interleukin-1β/interleukin-18 (IL-1β/IL-18) [70, 71]. In the noncanonical pathway, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can directly bind and activate caspase-4/5/11 and further cleave GSDMD into N-GSDMD, thereby initiating the pyroptosis program [72, 73]. Furthermore, accumulating data suggest that other members of GSDMs are also involved in pyroptosis [74,75,76,77], and the expanding understanding of the diverse activities of GSDMs has made the study of pyroptosis an attractive topic for cancer research. The main pathways involved in apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis are summarized and presented in Fig. 2.
Effects of CAFs on tumor apoptosis
Apoptosis, the most renowned type of RCD, is a highly regulated and controlled process that involves a series of molecular processes, leading to the orderly and controlled deconstruction of cells [25]. In certain cases, CAFs can modulate apoptosis in neighboring tumor cells through secreted factors and cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment (Fig. 2).
Dysregulation of apoptosis is one of the classical hallmarks of the maintenance and regulation of cancer development [78, 79]. Currently, a substantial body of research has illuminated the role of CAFs in the initiation and progression of cancers through the regulation of apoptosis. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the exosomes transport miRNAs (miR-224-5p [80], miR-181b-3p [81], and miR-135b-5p [82]) and circRNAs (circN4BP2L2 [83] and circSLC7A6 [84]) from CAFs into cancer cells to act as inhibitors of apoptosis and promote the pathogenesis of CRC. Moreover, the secretion of IL-6 by CAFs leads to the upregulation of BCL-XL and MCL-1 in CRC cells via the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway, which simultaneously promotes apoptosis resistance [85]; however, the dynamic interactions between pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic BCL‑2 protein families (BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-w, MCL-1 and BCL-2A1) balance the commitment of cells to apoptosis [86, 87]. In estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, it has also been verified that CAFs promote MCL-1 expression and apoptosis resistance in an IL-6-dependent manner [88]. Additionally, Bian et al. derived CAFs from oral tongue squamous carcinoma tissue. Their investigation revealed that CAFs upregulated the expression of BCL-2 and inhibited heat-induced apoptosis through the paracrine secretion of Mig [89]. Moreover, it has been verified that lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC)-derived CAFs can enhance cell proliferation and suppress apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. This effect is correlated with the upregulation of COL10A1 expression in CAFs. Nevertheless, the authors did not explain the mechanism by which COL10A1 is delivered into LUSC cells [90]. Notably, despite the identification of pro-malignant molecules within CAFs in numerous studies, research on the regulatory mechanisms controlling the secretion of relevant molecules within CAFs remains comparatively limited.
On the other hand, many cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, exert their effects by inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. Therefore, it is understandable that CAFs could also contribute to drug resistance by regulating the apoptosis of tumor cells. Notably, Neophytou et al. addressed the significance of CAFs in impeding apoptosis in multidrug-resistant cancers [91]. For example, in lung cancer, the present results supported that CAFs suppress the apoptosis program and enhance chemoresistance via the secretion of soluble factors and exosomes [92,93,94,95,96]. Similarly, studies in other cancers have also shown that CAFs promote radiation resistance in tumor cells by inhibiting the level of apoptosis [97]. Taken together, the above data indicate that CAFs can elevate the threshold for apoptosis in tumor cells, contributing specifically to the advancement of tumors and the development of treatment resistance.
Although CAFs exhibit oncogenic properties through the suppression of apoptosis in tumor cells, there is evidence suggesting that CAFs can also stimulate apoptosis in tumor cells. For instance, Itoh et al. conducted a co-culture experiment involving gastric cancer cells and CAFs. Their findings identified a significant induction of apoptosis in cancer cells upon direct interaction with CAFs, with the process controlled by the DR4-caspase-8 signaling pathway [98]. Interestingly, apoptotic cancer cells release apoptotic vesicles, which in turn promote CAF-led cancer invasion [98]. Overall, CAFs display a dual capacity in the modulation of tumor apoptosis, engaging in both anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic actions through secreted factors or direct cellular interactions.
Effects of CAFs on tumor autophagy
Autophagy is a regulated mechanism that delivers dysfunctional or unnecessary cellular cargoes to lysosomes for degradation and recycling [53]. However, the process and roles of autophagy in tumor development and progression appear to be complex [55, 99]. Recent studies have addressed not only the intrinsic functions of autophagy in tumor cells but also the involvement of autophagy in the TME, including immune cells and stromal cells [100,101,102]. Although several publications have documented that autophagy occurs in CAFs [103,104,105], herein, we aimed to summarize the impacts exerted by CAFs on the regulation of autophagy signaling in tumor cells (Fig. 2).
Dysfunctional regulation of autophagy in ovarian cancer mediated by CAFs has been discussed previously [106]. In recent years, Thongchot et al. have identified IL-8 as a cytokine released by CAFs that drives ovarian cancer cell metastasis and is mechanistically linked to the downregulation of autophagy [107]. Consistently, other studies revealed that the cytokine IL-6 isolated from CAFs promoted cholangiocarcinoma cell migration, and this effect was also associated with the inhibition of autophagy in cancer cells [108,109,110]. Moreover, periostin (PN) is a secreted extracellular matrix protein that is commonly expressed in CAFs in several cancers [111, 112]. In colorectal cancer, CAF-derived PN was confirmed to promote the migration of cancer cells. Specifically, CAF-derived PN bound to the predominant ITGα5β1 or ITGα6β4 receptors on colorectal cancer cells, thus initiating the AKT-dependent signaling cascade and further attenuating autophagy [113]. These findings suggest that CAF-derived cytokines/chemokines confer malignant phenotypes on tumor cells via autophagy suppression and that CAFs may be potential therapeutic targets for treating or blocking cancer metastasis.
In conjunction with investigating the roles of CAF-mediated autophagy in tumor metastasis, numerous studies have focused on delineating the significance of CAF-mediated autophagy in the context of tumor drug resistance. In colorectal cancer, Zhu et al. reported that the long non-coding RNA FAL1 (lnc-FAL1) was mainly derived from exosomes released by CAFs. However, the overexpression of lnc-FAL1 in cancer cells was further observed to hinder autophagy by promoting the ubiquitination and degradation of Beclin1, thereby contributing to oxaliplatin resistance [114]. Indeed, the impact of autophagy on tumor drug resistance is inherently dualistic [115, 116]. Concurrently, CAFs also have dual effects on tumor drug resistance, not only through the inhibition of autophagy but also by enhancing autophagic processes. Liu et al. revealed that in breast cancer, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) functions as an extracellular signaling molecule and is secreted by CAFs via the GPR30/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Meanwhile, CAF-derived HMGB1 was further confirmed to stimulate autophagy through MEK/ERK signaling in ERα-positive breast cancer cells, thus promoting tamoxifen resistance in cancer cells [117]. Similarly, an additional study revealed increased HMGB1 expression in breast cancer cells after coculture with CAFs, wherein the heightened HMGB1 levels increased resistance to doxorubicin in cancer cells through the potentiation of autophagy [118]. In addition, Liao et al. first reported that CAFs contribute to the development of cisplatin resistance in tongue cancer, which is also associated with the activation of autophagy mechanisms [119]. In summary, the effect of CAFs on tumor resistance through the autophagy pathway is multifaceted, and unraveling the precise molecular pathways involved in this process has potential for developing targeted therapies by focusing on CAFs.
Intriguingly, Mukhopadhyay et al. proposed a novel function of CAFs in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [120]. It has been shown that blocking autophagy in PDAC cells is a powerful approach for hindering the development of tumors. Mechanistically, they verified that autophagy suppression attenuates the formation of a labile iron pool (LIP) (Fe2+) and impedes the synthesis of iron-sulfur clusters [120]. Consequently, this cascade leads to a reduction in the succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B (SDHB), resulting in compromised mitochondrial function [120]. However, when cocultured with autophagy-inhibited PDAC cells in vitro, a notable upregulation of the iron efflux protein ferroportin (FPN) was observed in CAFs, facilitating the compensation of the LIP in autophagy-inhibited PDAC cells [120]. Thus, their proposal suggests an intricate interaction in which CAFs serve as a substitute for autophagy in PDAC [120, 121].
Effects of CAFs on tumor ferroptosis
Ferroptosis, which is characterized by intracellular iron accumulation and lipid peroxidation, is a newly described form of regulated cell death that was first defined in 2012 [58]. In recent years, ferroptosis has attracted a great deal of attention in cancer research communities, and it exhibits a promising prospect for cancer treatment [26].
Studies have shown that CAFs can support cancer proliferation and therapeutic resistance by inhibiting ferroptosis. A close association between arachidonate lipoxygenase 15 (ALOX15) and lipid peroxidation has been reported in various types of cancers, and was reported as a potential promoter of ferroptosis [122, 123]. In gastric cancer, researchers revealed that CAFs inhibit ferroptosis and promote tumor growth by secreting exosomal miR-522, which targets ALOX15. Moreover, cisplatin and paclitaxel can promote miR-522 secretion from CAFs by activating the USP7/hnRNPA1 pathway [123]. Besides, long-chain fatty acid-CoA ligase 4 (ACSL4) is involved in the activation of long-chain fatty acid metabolism and is reported to enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to ferroptosis by promoting the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products [124]. Qi et al. demonstrated that miR-3173-5p derived from CAF exosomes sponged ACSL4 and inhibited ferroptosis, which induced gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer [125]. Of note, in addition to secreting exosomes, CAFs also play a regulatory role in tumor cell ferroptosis through the secretion of small molecular proteins. Previous research has revealed that CAFs activate HSF1 in tumor cells by secreting thrombospondin-4 (TSP-4) [126]. In another study, CAFs were shown to confer resistance to ferroptosis in glioblastoma cell lines through HSF1 activation. Mechanistically, HSF1 transcriptionally enhances DLEU1 expression, which leads to a decrease in ATF3 and an increase in SLC7A11 [127]. Hence, eliminating CAFs from the TME will result in increased ferroptosis and improved sensitivity to cancer treatment.
Interestingly, CAFs can also deliver tumor suppressor factors and stimulate ferroptosis in tumor cells. Qu et al. reported a novel lncRNA Disheveled Binding Antagonist of beta Catenin3 antisense1 (DACT3-AS1), and showed that CAF-derived exosomal DACT3-AS1 could alleviate gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Furthermore, CAF-derived exosomal DACT3-AS1 was confirmed to downregulate the expression of xCT and GPX4 in oxaliplatin-treated cells and increase oxaliplatin sensitivity by activating ferroptosis both in vitro and in vivo [128]. In summary, CAFs have great potential as cancer therapeutic targets by mediating ferroptosis, and we suspect that the current challenge is to elucidate the intricate mechanisms underlying the dual regulation of ferroptosis by different signaling factors in CAFs (CAF-derived molecules that regulate ferroptosis are summarized in Fig. 2).
Effects of CAFs on tumor pyroptosis
Pyroptosis, an inflammatory form of RCD mediated by GSDMs, is associated with tumor-associated inflammation. Intriguingly, previous research has indicated the active involvement of CAFs in contributing to tumor inflammation [129]. In breast cancer, DAMPs can trigger the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and induce pyroptosis in CAFs through the NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD pathway. The resulting release of IL-1β further promotes tumor growth and metastasis [130].
Nevertheless, there is still limited research on the specific processes and mechanisms by which CAFs directly regulate pyroptosis in tumor cells. Limited data from public databases indicate a positive correlation between CAF infiltration and the expression of GSDMD and GSDME in cancer cells [131, 132], suggesting the potential for CAF-induced pyroptosis in cancer cells. In addition, Hou et al. identified a non-immune checkpoint function of PD-L1 and demonstrated that PD-L1, cooperated with p-Stat3, could transcriptionally upregulate the expression of GSDMC, leading to the transition of cancer cells from apoptosis to pyroptosis [75]. Meanwhile, several published studies have shown that CAFs can upregulate PD-L1 expression in cancer cells by transporting some cytokines and vesicles [133,134,135,136]. Therefore, we hypothesize that CAFs can modulate the process of pyroptosis by indirectly regulating pyroptotic signaling pathways. Similarly, it has been verified that CAFs exhibit elevated levels of pro-inflammatory factors and can secrete signaling molecules (e.g., IL-8 and HMGB1) that activate the NF-κB pathway in neighboring cancer cells [137,138,139]. Notably, NF-κB activation is intricately related to inflammasome signaling and has the potential to mediate the expression of genes associated with pyroptosis [140, 141]. Furthermore, Chalkidi et al. analyzed the transcriptomic profile of CAFs in colitis-associated cancer and revealed the significant enrichment pathways in pyroptosis within CAFs [142]. Thus, the presented evidence indicates that CAFs may possess the potential to regulate pyroptosis indirectly by influencing key molecules within the pyroptotic signaling pathway.
Intriguingly, CD8+ T cells were recently shown to trigger pyroptosis through the release of granzyme [76, 143]. Notably, as the most dominant component of the TME, CAFs have been implicated in modulating the infiltration and behavior of CD8+ T cells. For example, Ou et al. first revealed the spatial and functional characterization of pro-tumorigenic cancer-associated myofibroblasts (myCAFs) in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and discovered that this population was associated with decreased CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration in CSCC [144]. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, activated CAFs appear to attract and adhere to CD8+ T cells by secreting CXCL12, preventing their access to cancer cells [145]. Moreover, research indicates that CAFs suppress the activity of CD8+ T cells and can even induce the death of CD8+ T cells through the action of PD-L1/2 and FASL [146, 147]. Therefore, drawing from the aforementioned mechanisms, we hypothesize that CAFs may alleviate the incidence of pyroptosis induced by CD8+ T cells in tumor cells.
Taken together, these findings suggest that CAFs can regulate pyroptosis in tumor cells via indirect signaling pathways or complicated cellular interactions (Fig. 2). However, the specific modulation of cellular pyroptosis induced by CAFs and the intricate molecular mechanisms involved require further investigation.
Effects of RCD on CAFs
Notably, evidence from numerous studies underscores the fact that dying cells release or expose bioactive molecules on their surface, intricately shaping the dynamics of the TME [148,149,150]. However, the preceding studies predominantly focused on immune cells, and there remains a paucity of research addressing the impact of cell death specifically on CAFs.
Classically, apoptosis dismantles cells through a non-lytic mechanism and is generally characterized by immunological quiescence [151]. Nevertheless, contemporary findings have proposed that apoptotic cells lead to the generation of apoptotic cell-derived extracellular vesicles (ApoEVs) that can be delivered to adjacent cells, potentially contributing to the modulation of the TME [152]. It has been reported that these vesicles may serve as carriers for the transmission of bioactive molecules and cellular organelles to targeted cells [152, 153]. In the context of gastric cancer, Itoh et al. conducted in vitro co-culture experiments involving CAFs and cancer cells and subsequently isolated ApoEVs from conditioned medium (CM). The findings elucidated that CAFs exhibit a growth-restrictive impact on cancer cells by triggering apoptosis, and intriguingly, ApoEVs from this interaction stimulate the invasive properties of CAFs and cause CAF-led cancer invasion [98]. However, the authors did not provide a detailed exploration of the specific molecular components within the ApoEVs. In contrast, Kim et al. stated that the administration of CM derived from apoptotic lung cancer cells has the potential to attenuate CAF activation and invasion via the inhibition of TGF-β1 signaling pathways as well as the downregulation of MMP-2 and MMP-12 expression [154]. Furthermore, upon interaction with neighboring apoptotic cancer cells expressing Dll1, the activation of Notch1-WISP-1 signaling is initiated in CAFs, thereby exerting anti-invasive effects on lung cancer cells [154]. Hence, the intricate interplay between apoptotic cells and CAFs is characterized by a multifaceted “friend” or “foe” relationship and needs to be carefully differentiated when developing effective strategies for cancer treatment.
Unlike apoptotic cell death, lytic forms of cell death, such as pyroptosis and ferroptosis, lead to membrane permeabilization and cell lysis and the subsequent release of intracellular components and inflammatory cytokines [155, 156]. In the process of cell death, some endogenous molecules known as DAMPs are either released (such as ATP and HMGB1) or exposed on the cell surface (such as calreticulin (CRT) and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90)) [157]. Recent evidence suggests that when exposed to DAMPs, such as ATP, monosodium urate (MSU), H2O2, and necrotic fluid, breast fibroblasts function as DAMP sensors and undergo pro-inflammatory signaling pathway activation via NLRP3 activation, which is particularly intensified by necrotic fluid derived from advanced tumors [130]. Notably, this inflammatory cascade further upregulates αSMA and enhances the activation of fibroblast cells [130, 158]. Moreover, extracellular HMGB1 is the most extensively studied DAMP and acts as a multifunctional protein involved in a variety of physiological and pathological processes [159, 160]. Recently, Chen et al. presented evidence indicating that HMGB1 secreted from breast cancer cells could induce fibroblast activation via its receptor, the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), leading to the upregulation of aerobic glycolysis [161]. Additionally, Ren et al. conducted an in vitro cultivation experiment with recombinant HMGB1 and showed an increase in autophagic stimulation in CAFs [139].
Inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-18, which are released during pyroptosis, are also key players in tissue inflammation, tumor immunity, and cancer progression [162,163,164]. In addition, several studies have investigated the activity of inflammatory cytokines in CAFs. Schauer et al. presented findings indicating that a high level of IL-1β in ovarian cancer stimulates IL-1R1 on adjacent CAFs, leading to the inhibition of P53 and transactivation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in CAFs [165]. As a result, the activated NF-κB signaling pathway further promotes the transcription and release of a diverse array of immunomodulatory chemokines in CAFs [165]. Specifically, IL-1β exhibits the capacity to promote the inflammatory CAFs (iCAF) phenotype, as evidenced by the increased expression of PDPN, PDGFRα, and FAP proteins in CAFs, but did not impact the myCAFs marker protein αSMA [166]. Thus, IL-1β has the potential to activate inflammatory signaling pathways within CAFs and initiate CAF reprogramming.
In addition, Jiang et al. presented that ANO1 could inhibit gastrointestinal cancer ferroptosis in a PI3K-Akt signaling-dependent manner and stimulate the production and secretion of TGF‐β by cancer cells, which in turn recruits CAFs in the TME and confers immunotherapeutic resistance [167]. Interestingly, the suppressed expression and secretion of TGF-β resulting from ANO1 knockdown were reversed by the ferroptosis inhibitor Fer-1, highlighting a potential opposite relationship between ferroptosis and TGF-β release within cancer cells [167]. Moreover, a number of studies have demonstrated the participation of the TGF-β signaling pathway in the formation, activation, migration, and metabolism of CAFs [15, 168, 169]. Hence, ferroptosis may exert regulatory effects on CAFs by releasing TGF-β from cancer cells.
Recently, Mukhopadhyay et al. co-cultured autophagy-inhibited PDAC cells with CAFs and performed a secretome analysis on the supernatant of the autophagy-inhibited PDAC culture medium [120]. The results revealed that autophagy-inhibited PDAC cells could upregulate the level of FPN in adjacent CAFs through the secretion of IL-6, resulting in an increase in the efflux of iron from CAFs and leading to the compensation of the LIP in the autophagy-inhibited PDAC cells [120]. This research introduces, for the first time, the autophagic activity of tumor cells in relation to the iron metabolism of CAFs. Nevertheless, how autophagy-inhibited tumor cells facilitate the secretion of IL-6 and the source of iron in CAFs remains to be further investigated.
Taken together, RCD plays a significant and influential role in modulating CAFs (Fig. 3), including dynamic alterations in the activation, behavior, function, characteristics, and metabolism of CAFs. Understanding the intricate interplay between RCD and CAF modulation is crucial for unraveling the complexities of the TME and may offer new avenues for cancer treatment.
Therapeutic implications
Currently, considerable progress has already been made in the field of CAF targeting, and this topic has been reviewed previously [8, 170, 171]. There is no doubt that the exploration of novel therapeutic interventions targeting CAFs holds promise but also presents notable challenges. An important reason is the noteworthy heterogeneity inherent in CAFs, involving both surface marker heterogeneity and functional heterogeneity (Fig. 1). Due to the lack of specific biomarkers in CAFs, an attractive strategy is to switch CAFs to more quiescent fibroblast states through interventions such as all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and vitamin D, which have been demonstrated to be effective in restraining CAF functions [172, 173]. Moreover, in preclinical and clinical studies, several drugs have been identified to modulate RCD, thus exerting anti-tumor effects [25, 26, 174]. For example, published results have demonstrated the positive effects of CQ/HCQ in cancer treatment through the suppression of autophagy [175, 176]. Intriguingly, autophagy is also actively involved in the activation and function of CAFs [177], and CAF-regulated autophagy plays a pivotal role in tumor initiation and progression. This opens the way for the development of novel therapeutic approaches that target CAFs and tumor cells simultaneously by regulating the autophagy signaling pathway.
In clinical practice, tumor cells experience several and sometimes intersecting forms of RCD when treated with drugs, and the exact effect of dying cells on the TME remains relatively uncertain. As mentioned above, some endogenous molecules, such as DAMPs and inflammatory cytokines are released during cell death. However, the above molecules may further activate CAFs, thereby causing tumor cells to become resistant to the original treatment. In addition, when tumor cells are suppressed through autophagy, they can also release IL-6, which further contributes to the pro-tumor effects of CAFs [120]. Therefore, in the treatment of tumors in the future, it is crucial to consider the interfering role played by CAFs, and combining the traditional anti-tumor agents with CAF-targeting therapy may improve treatment outcomes.
Conclusions, challenges and perspectives
Currently, studies have increasingly focused on the importance of the TME for the initiation, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance of cancer. As a prominent component of the TME, CAFs intricately engage in direct and paracrine crosstalk with neighboring cells, manifesting a multifaceted and dynamic influence within the TME. Moreover, extensive investigations have demonstrated the regulatory effect of CAFs on RCD in neighboring cancer cells. Our review summarizes the current knowledge on the interplay between CAFs and four types of RCD. As stated above, CAFs may function as crucial regulators of the RCD process within tumors, whereas dying cells may also confer effects on CAFs, thereby developing a feedback system.
Nevertheless, compared with the issues that have been resolved, there are also multiple challenges that still need to be addressed. First, CAFs exert both pro-tumor and anti-tumor effects on tumor cells by regulating RCD. This indicates the considerable plasticity of CAFs in terms of their function and presents additional difficulties in the search for ways to target CAFs for effective tumor treatment. Second, CAFs can modulate various forms of RCD. Therefore, the variety and complexity of CAF-mediated RCD types within the same tumor microenvironment and the potential crosstalk between these distinct RCD pathways need further investigation. Furthermore, modern techniques, such as single-cell analysis techniques, offer potent means to decipher the heterogeneity of CAFs, which raises the question of whether diverse subpopulations of CAFs elicit similar forms of RCD. Third, in clinical practice, it is noteworthy that anticancer drugs exhibit the capability to induce diverse modes of RCD. For example, anthracycline chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated the potential to trigger autophagy, apoptosis, and pyroptosis in breast cancer cells [75, 178, 179], and understanding how different RCD modes influence CAF behavior in tumors remains an area that requires further exploration. Last but not least, a substantial portion of research conducted in vitro experiments to investigate the properties of CAFs, which may limit the ability to accurately capture the multifaceted and dynamic roles of CAFs. Notably, when CAFs are isolated from the ECM, the preservation of their biological characteristics becomes a subject of consideration. Moreover, the effect of in vitro culture media on CAFs is still unclear, and the two-dimensional culture model falls short of mimicking the complex cellular interactions that occur in vivo.
Overall, this review provides a brief introduction to CAFs and the core molecular mechanisms involved in four types of RCD. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive overview of different forms of RCD in tumors that are mediated by CAFs, as well as the effects of these modes of RCD on CAFs, which might offer novel therapeutic avenues for future cancer treatments.
References
Ren X, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Li Z, Siemers N, Zhang Z. Insights gained from single-cell analysis of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Annu Rev Immunol. 2021;39:583–609.
Barkley D, Moncada R, Pour M, Liberman DA, Dryg I, Werba G, et al. Cancer cell states recur across tumor types and form specific interactions with the tumor microenvironment. Nat Genet. 2022;54:1192–201.
Ozga AJ, Chow MT, Luster AD. Chemokines and the immune response to cancer. Immunity. 2021;54:859–74.
de Visser KE, Joyce JA. The evolving tumor microenvironment: from cancer initiation to metastatic outgrowth. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:374–403.
Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19:1423–37.
Bejarano L, Jordao MJC, Joyce JA. Therapeutic targeting of the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:933–59.
Sahai E, Astsaturov I, Cukierman E, DeNardo DG, Egeblad M, Evans RM, et al. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:174–86.
Chen Y, McAndrews KM, Kalluri R. Clinical and therapeutic relevance of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:792–804.
Caligiuri G, Tuveson DA. Activated fibroblasts in cancer: perspectives and challenges. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:434–49.
Hu JL, Wang W, Lan XL, Zeng ZC, Liang YS, Yan YR, et al. CAFs secreted exosomes promote metastasis and chemotherapy resistance by enhancing cell stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:91.
Nallasamy P, Nimmakayala RK, Karmakar S, Leon F, Seshacharyulu P, Lakshmanan I, et al. Pancreatic tumor microenvironment factor promotes cancer stemness via SPP1-CD44 Axis. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:1998–13.e7.
Herrera M, Berral-Gonzalez A, Lopez-Cade I, Galindo-Pumarino C, Bueno-Fortes S, Martin-Merino M, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived gene signatures determine prognosis in colon cancer patients. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:73.
Picard FSR, Lutz V, Brichkina A, Neuhaus F, Ruckenbrod T, Hupfer A, et al. IL-17A-producing CD8(+) T cells promote PDAC via induction of inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts. Gut. 2023;72:1510–22.
Gao Y, Li X, Zeng C, Liu C, Hao Q, Li W, et al. CD63(+) cancer-associated fibroblasts confer tamoxifen resistance to breast cancer cells through exosomal miR-22. Adv Sci. 2020;7:2002518.
Wu F, Yang J, Liu J, Wang Y, Mu J, Zeng Q, et al. Signaling pathways in cancer-associated fibroblasts and targeted therapy for cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:218.
Obradovic A, Graves D, Korrer M, Wang Y, Roy S, Naveed A, et al. Immunostimulatory cancer-associated fibroblast subpopulations can predict immunotherapy response in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:2094–109.
Galbo PM Jr, Zang X, Zheng D. Molecular features of cancer-associated fibroblast subtypes and their implication on cancer pathogenesis, prognosis, and immunotherapy resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:2636–47.
Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:486–41.
Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:31–46.
Yan J, Wan P, Choksi S, Liu ZG. Necroptosis and tumor progression. Trends Cancer. 2022;8:21–7.
Liu T, Zhu C, Chen X, Guan G, Zou C, Shen S, et al. Ferroptosis, as the most enriched programmed cell death process in glioma, induces immunosuppression and immunotherapy resistance. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24:1113–25.
Bedoui S, Herold MJ, Strasser A. Emerging connectivity of programmed cell death pathways and its physiological implications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:678–95.
Peng F, Liao M, Qin R, Zhu S, Peng C, Fu L, et al. Regulated cell death (RCD) in cancer: key pathways and targeted therapies. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:286.
Chen X, Zeh HJ, Kang R, Kroemer G, Tang D. Cell death in pancreatic cancer: from pathogenesis to therapy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:804–23.
Carneiro BA, El-Deiry WS. Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:395–17.
Lei G, Zhuang L, Gan B. Targeting ferroptosis as a vulnerability in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22:381–96.
Gao W, Wang X, Zhou Y, Wang X, Yu Y. Autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in tumor immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:196.
Tang R, Xu J, Zhang B, Liu J, Liang C, Hua J, et al. Ferroptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis in anticancer immunity. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:110.
Liu J, Hong M, Li Y, Chen D, Wu Y, Hu Y. Programmed cell death tunes tumor immunity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:847345.
Virchow R. Die Cellularpathologie in Ihrer Begründung Auf Physiologische Und Pathologische Gewebelehre. 1858.
Li B, Wang JH. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing: force generation and measurement. J Tissue Viability. 2011;20:108–20.
Bainbridge P. Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts. J Wound Care. 2013;22:407–8.
Rasanen K, Vaheri A. Activation of fibroblasts in cancer stroma. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:2713–22.
Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:392–401.
Nurmik M, Ullmann P, Rodriguez F, Haan S, Letellier E. In search of definitions: cancer-associated fibroblasts and their markers. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:895–905.
Chen X, Song E. Turning foes to friends: targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:99–15.
Hu D, Li Z, Zheng B, Lin X, Pan Y, Gong P, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in breast cancer: challenges and opportunities. Cancer Commun. 2022;42:401–34.
Foster DS, Januszyk M, Delitto D, Yost KE, Griffin M, Guo J, et al. Multiomic analysis reveals conservation of cancer-associated fibroblast phenotypes across species and tissue of origin. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:1392–406.e7.
Wu X, Lu W, Zhang W, Zhang D, Mei H, Zhang M, et al. Integrated analysis of single-cell RNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq unravels the heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblasts in TNBC. Aging. 2023;15:12674–97.
Ma C, Yang C, Peng A, Sun T, Ji X, Mi J, et al. Pan-cancer spatially resolved single-cell analysis reveals the crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 2023;22:170.
Shu Z, Fan M, Tu B, Tang Z, Wang H, Li H, et al. The Lin28b/Wnt5a axis drives pancreas cancer through crosstalk between cancer associated fibroblasts and tumor epithelium. Nat Commun. 2023;14:6885.
Goulet CR, Champagne A, Bernard G, Vandal D, Chabaud S, Pouliot F, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition of bladder cancer cells through paracrine IL-6 signalling. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:137.
Masoudi-Khoram N, Soheilifar MH, Ghorbanifar S, Nobari S, Hakimi M, Hassani M. Exosomes derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts mediate response to cancer therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023;185:103967.
Li C, Teixeira AF, Zhu HJ, Ten Dijke P. Cancer associated-fibroblast-derived exosomes in cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:154.
Kobayashi H, Enomoto A, Woods SL, Burt AD, Takahashi M, Worthley DL. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in gastrointestinal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:282–95.
Zhang T, Li X, He Y, Wang Y, Shen J, Wang S, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived HAPLN1 promotes tumour invasion through extracellular matrix remodeling in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2022;25:346–59.
Knipper K, Lyu SI, Quaas A, Bruns CJ, Schmidt T. Cancer-associated fibroblast heterogeneity and its influence on the extracellular matrix and the tumor microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:13482.
Zhang H, Yue X, Chen Z, Liu C, Wu W, Zhang N, et al. Define cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment: new opportunities in cancer immunotherapy and advances in clinical trials. Mol Cancer. 2023;22:159.
Ozdemir BC, Pentcheva-Hoang T, Carstens JL, Zheng X, Wu CC, Simpson TR, et al. Depletion of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis induces immunosuppression and accelerates pancreas cancer with reduced survival. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:719–34.
Nagata S. Apoptosis and clearance of apoptotic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:489–17.
Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, Alnemri ES, et al. Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell. 1997;91:479–89.
Doherty J, Baehrecke EH. Life, death and autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:1110–17.
Yamamoto H, Zhang S, Mizushima N. Autophagy genes in biology and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2023;24:382–400.
Levine B, Kroemer G. Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell. 2019;176:11–42.
Debnath J, Gammoh N, Ryan KM. Autophagy and autophagy-related pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24:560–75.
Nakatogawa H. Mechanisms governing autophagosome biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:439–58.
Rybstein MD, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. The autophagic network and cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:243–51.
Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–72.
Mishima E, Nakamura T, Zheng J, Zhang W, Mourao ASD, Sennhenn P, et al. DHODH inhibitors sensitize to ferroptosis by FSP1 inhibition. Nature. 2023;619:E9–18.
Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G, Tang D. Organelle-specific regulation of ferroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:2843–56.
Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22:266–82.
Koppula P, Zhuang L, Gan B. Cystine transporter SLC7A11/xCT in cancer: ferroptosis, nutrient dependency, and cancer therapy. Protein Cell. 2021;12:599–20.
Bersuker K, Hendricks JM, Li Z, Magtanong L, Ford B, Tang PH, et al. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. 2019;575:688–92.
Doll S, Freitas FP, Shah R, Aldrovandi M, da Silva MC, Ingold I, et al. FSP1 is a glutathione-independent ferroptosis suppressor. Nature. 2019;575:693–8.
Mao C, Liu X, Zhang Y, Lei G, Yan Y, Lee H, et al. DHODH-mediated ferroptosis defence is a targetable vulnerability in cancer. Nature. 2021;593:586–90.
Soula M, Weber RA, Zilka O, Alwaseem H, La K, Yen F, et al. Metabolic determinants of cancer cell sensitivity to canonical ferroptosis inducers. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16:1351–60.
Shi J, Gao W, Shao F. Pyroptosis: gasdermin-mediated programmed necrotic cell death. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42:245–54.
Shao F. Gasdermins: making pores for pyroptosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:620–1.
Christgen S, Place DE, Kanneganti TD. Toward targeting inflammasomes: insights into their regulation and activation. Cell Res. 2020;30:315–27.
Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Huang H, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526:660–5.
Liu X, Zhang Z, Ruan J, Pan Y, Magupalli VG, Wu H, et al. Inflammasome-activated gasdermin D causes pyroptosis by forming membrane pores. Nature. 2016;535:153–8.
Kayagaki N, Warming S, Lamkanfi M, Vande Walle L, Louie S, Dong J, et al. Non-canonical inflammasome activation targets caspase-11. Nature. 2011;479:117–21.
Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Gao W, Ding J, Li P, et al. Inflammatory caspases are innate immune receptors for intracellular LPS. Nature. 2014;514:187–92.
Wang Y, Gao W, Shi X, Ding J, Liu W, He H, et al. Chemotherapy drugs induce pyroptosis through caspase-3 cleavage of a gasdermin. Nature. 2017;547:99–103.
Hou J, Zhao R, Xia W, Chang CW, You Y, Hsu JM, et al. PD-L1-mediated gasdermin C expression switches apoptosis to pyroptosis in cancer cells and facilitates tumour necrosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22:1264–75.
Zhou Z, He H, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Su Y, et al. Granzyme A from cytotoxic lymphocytes cleaves GSDMB to trigger pyroptosis in target cells. Science. 2020;368:eaaz7548.
Deng W, Bai Y, Deng F, Pan Y, Mei S, Zheng Z, et al. Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B cleaves GSDMA and triggers pyroptosis. Nature. 2022;602:496–502.
Fernald K, Kurokawa M. Evading apoptosis in cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 2013;23:620–33.
Wong RS. Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:87.
Zheng Y, Zeng J, Lin D, Xia H, Wang X, Chen L, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from cancer-associated fibroblast carries miR-224-5p targeting SLC4A4 to promote the proliferation, invasion and migration of colorectal cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2021;42:1143–53.
Jiang Y, Qiu Q, Jing X, Song Z, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived exosome miR-181b-3p promotes the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer by regulating SNX2 expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023;641:177–85.
Yin H, Yu S, Xie Y, Dai X, Dong M, Sheng C, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived exosomes upregulate microRNA-135b-5p to promote colorectal cancer cell growth and angiogenesis by inhibiting thioredoxin-interacting protein. Cell Signal. 2021;84:110029.
Yang K, Zhang F, Luo B, Qu Z. CAFs-derived small extracellular vesicles circN4BP2L2 promotes proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer via miR-664b-3p/HMGB3 pathway. Cancer Biol Ther. 2022;23:404–16.
Gu C, Lu H, Qian Z. Matrine reduces the secretion of exosomal circSLC7A6 from cancer-associated fibroblast to inhibit tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer by regulating CXCR5. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;527:638–45.
Maeda A, Takahashi H, Harata S, Watanabe K, Yanagita T, Suzuki T, et al. The interaction between cancer-associated fibroblasts and cancer cells enhances Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2022;42:1277–88.
Czabotar PE, Garcia-Saez AJ. Mechanisms of BCL-2 family proteins in mitochondrial apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24:732–48.
Singh R, Letai A, Sarosiek K. Regulation of apoptosis in health and disease: the balancing act of BCL-2 family proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:175–93.
Louault K, Bonneaud TL, Seveno C, Gomez-Bougie P, Nguyen F, Gautier F, et al. Interactions between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor cells promote MCL-1 dependency in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Oncogene. 2019;38:3261–73.
Bian L, Sun X, Jin K, He Y. Oral cancer-associated fibroblasts inhibit heat-induced apoptosis in Tca8113 cells through upregulated expression of Bcl-2 through the Mig/CXCR3 axis. Oncol Rep. 2012;28:2063–8.
Li Y, Li X, Deng M, Ye C, Peng Y, Lu Y. Cancer-associated fibroblasts hinder lung squamous cell carcinoma oxidative stress-induced apoptosis via METTL3 mediated m(6)A methylation of COL10A1. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:4320809.
Neophytou CM, Trougakos IP, Erin N, Papageorgis P. Apoptosis deregulation and the development of cancer multi-drug resistance. Cancers. 2021;13:4363.
Tao L, Huang G, Wang R, Pan Y, He Z, Chu X, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts treated with cisplatin facilitates chemoresistance of lung adenocarcinoma through IL-11/IL-11R/STAT3 signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38408.
Shintani Y, Fujiwara A, Kimura T, Kawamura T, Funaki S, Minami M, et al. IL-6 secreted from cancer-associated fibroblasts mediates chemoresistance in NSCLC by increasing epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1482–92.
Sun X, Chen Z. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived CCL5 contributes to cisplatin resistance in A549 NSCLC cells partially through upregulation of lncRNA HOTAIR expression. Oncol Lett. 2021;22:696.
Wang H, Huang H, Wang L, Liu Y, Wang M, Zhao S, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts secreted miR-103a-3p suppresses apoptosis and promotes cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Aging. 2021;13:14456–68.
Li Y, Chen Y, Miao L, Wang Y, Yu M, Yan X, et al. Stress-induced upregulation of TNFSF4 in cancer-associated fibroblast facilitates chemoresistance of lung adenocarcinoma through inhibiting apoptosis of tumor cells. Cancer Lett. 2021;497:212–20.
Chen X, Liu J, Zhang Q, Liu B, Cheng Y, Zhang Y, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-93-5p from cancer-associated fibroblasts confer radioresistance in colorectal cancer cells by downregulating FOXA1 and upregulating TGFB3. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:65.
Itoh G, Chida S, Yanagihara K, Yashiro M, Aiba N, Tanaka M. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce cancer cell apoptosis that regulates invasion mode of tumours. Oncogene. 2017;36:4434–44.
Mizushima N, Levine B. Autophagy in human diseases. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1564–76.
Xi L, Peng M, Liu S, Liu Y, Wan X, Hou Y, et al. Hypoxia-stimulated ATM activation regulates autophagy-associated exosome release from cancer-associated fibroblasts to promote cancer cell invasion. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10:e12146.
Mukhopadhyay S, Mahapatra KK, Praharaj PP, Patil S, Bhutia SK. Recent progress of autophagy signaling in tumor microenvironment and its targeting for possible cancer therapeutics. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;85:196–208.
Guan YH, Wang N, Deng ZW, Chen XG, Liu Y. Exploiting autophagy-regulative nanomaterials for activation of dendritic cells enables reinforced cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2022;282:121434.
Geng X, Li L, Luo Y, Yang W, Hu J, Zhao Z, et al. Tumor cell derived Lnc-FSD2-31:1 contributes to cancer-associated fibroblasts activation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression through extracellular vesicles cargo MiR-4736. Adv Sci. 2023;10:e2203324.
Liu X, Tang J, Peng L, Nie H, Zhang Y, Liu P. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote malignant phenotypes of prostate cancer cells via autophagy: cancer-associated fibroblasts promote prostate cancer development. Apoptosis. 2023;28:881–91.
New J, Arnold L, Ananth M, Alvi S, Thornton M, Werner L, et al. Secretory autophagy in cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes head and neck cancer progression and offers a novel therapeutic target. Cancer Res. 2017;77:6679–91.
Thuwajit C, Ferraresi A, Titone R, Thuwajit P, Isidoro C. The metabolic cross-talk between epithelial cancer cells and stromal fibroblasts in ovarian cancer progression: autophagy plays a role. Med Res Rev. 2018;38:1235–54.
Thongchot S, Jamjuntra P, Therasakvichya S, Warnnissorn M, Ferraresi A, Thuwajit P, et al. Interleukin‑8 released by cancer‑associated fibroblasts attenuates the autophagy and promotes the migration of ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2021;58:14.
Thongchot S, Ferraresi A, Vidoni C, Loilome W, Yongvanit P, Namwat N, et al. Resveratrol interrupts the pro-invasive communication between cancer associated fibroblasts and cholangiocarcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2018;430:160–71.
Li Z, Chen Z, Li S, Qian X, Zhang L, Long G, et al. Circ_0020256 induces fibroblast activation to drive cholangiocarcinoma development via recruitment of EIF4A3 protein to stabilize KLF4 mRNA. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9:161.
Thongchot S, Vidoni C, Ferraresi A, Loilome W, Khuntikeo N, Sangkhamanon S, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived IL-6 determines unfavorable prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma by affecting autophagy-associated chemoresponse. Cancers. 2021;13:2134.
Underwood TJ, Hayden AL, Derouet M, Garcia E, Noble F, White MJ, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts predict poor outcome and promote periostin-dependent invasion in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Pathol. 2015;235:466–77.
Kikuchi Y, Kashima TG, Nishiyama T, Shimazu K, Morishita Y, Shimazaki M, et al. Periostin is expressed in pericryptal fibroblasts and cancer-associated fibroblasts in the colon. J Histochem Cytochem. 2008;56:753–64.
Thongchot S, Singsuksawat E, Sumransub N, Pongpaibul A, Trakarnsanga A, Thuwajit P, et al. Periostin regulates autophagy through integrin alpha5beta1 or alpha6beta4 and an AKT-dependent pathway in colorectal cancer cell migration. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:12421–32.
Zhu S, Mao J, Zhang X, Wang P, Zhou Y, Tong J, et al. CAF-derived exosomal lncRNA FAL1 promotes chemoresistance to oxaliplatin by regulating autophagy in colorectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis. 2023;6:330–42.
Miller DR, Thorburn A. Autophagy and organelle homeostasis in cancer. Dev Cell. 2021;56:906–18.
Li YJ, Lei YH, Yao N, Wang CR, Hu N, Ye WC, et al. Autophagy and multidrug resistance in cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2017;36:52.
Liu L, Liu S, Luo H, Chen C, Zhang X, He L, et al. GPR30-mediated HMGB1 upregulation in CAFs induces autophagy and tamoxifen resistance in ERalpha-positive breast cancer cells. Aging. 2021;13:16178–97.
Amornsupak K, Insawang T, Thuwajit P, Pornchai OC, Eccles SA, Thuwajit C. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce high mobility group box 1 and contribute to resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:955.
Liao JK, Zhou B, Zhuang XM, Zhuang PL, Zhang DM, Chen WL. Cancer-associated fi broblasts confer cisplatin resistance of tongue cancer via autophagy activation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:1341–8.
Mukhopadhyay S, Encarnacion-Rosado J, Lin EY, Sohn ASW, Zhang H, Mancias JD, et al. Autophagy supports mitochondrial metabolism through the regulation of iron homeostasis in pancreatic cancer. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eadf9284.
Mukhopadhyay S, Encarnacion-Rosado J, Kimmelman AC. Autophagy fuels mitochondrial function through regulation of iron metabolism in pancreatic cancer. Autophagy. 2023;13:1–2.
Seiler A, Schneider M, Forster H, Roth S, Wirth EK, Culmsee C, et al. Glutathione peroxidase 4 senses and translates oxidative stress into 12/15-lipoxygenase dependent- and AIF-mediated cell death. Cell Metab. 2008;8:237–48.
Zhang H, Deng T, Liu R, Ning T, Yang H, Liu D, et al. CAF secreted miR-522 suppresses ferroptosis and promotes acquired chemo-resistance in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:43.
Doll S, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Panzilius E, Kobayashi S, Ingold I, et al. ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:91–8.
Qi R, Bai Y, Li K, Liu N, Xu Y, Dal E, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts suppress ferroptosis and induce gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells by secreting exosome-derived ACSL4-targeting miRNAs. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;68:100960.
Shi Y, Sun L, Zhang R, Hu Y, Wu Y, Dong X, et al. Thrombospondin 4/integrin alpha2/HSF1 axis promotes proliferation and cancer stem-like traits of gallbladder cancer by enhancing reciprocal crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:14.
Zhao J, Yang S, Lv C, Liu Y. Cancer-associated fibroblasts suppressed ferroptosis in glioblastoma via upregulating lncRNA DLEU1. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2023;324:C1039–52.
Qu X, Liu B, Wang L, Liu L, Zhao W, Liu C, et al. Loss of cancer-associated fibroblast-derived exosomal DACT3-AS1 promotes malignant transformation and ferroptosis-mediated oxaliplatin resistance in gastric cancer. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;68:100936.
Kennel KB, Bozlar M, De Valk AF, Greten FR. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in inflammation and antitumor immunity. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29:1009–16.
Ershaid N, Sharon Y, Doron H, Raz Y, Shani O, Cohen N, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome in fibroblasts links tissue damage with inflammation in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4375.
Li M, Jiang P, Wei S, Yang Y, Xiong L, Wang J, et al. Gasdermin D plays an oncogenic role in glioma and correlates to an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Biomolecules. 2023;13:904.
Zhang Z, Zhao S, Yang H, Chen Y, Feng H, An M, et al. Prognostic and immunological role of gasdermin E in pan-cancer analysis. Front Oncol. 2021;11:706266.
Li Z, Zhou J, Zhang J, Li S, Wang H, Du J. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote PD-L1 expression in mice cancer cells via secreting CXCL5. Int J Cancer. 2019;145:1946–57.
Dou D, Ren X, Han M, Xu X, Ge X, Gu Y, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived exosomes suppress immune cell function in breast cancer via the miR-92/PD-L1 pathway. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2026.
Duan Y, Zhang X, Ying H, Xu J, Yang H, Sun K, et al. Targeting MFAP5 in cancer-associated fibroblasts sensitizes pancreatic cancer to PD-L1-based immunochemotherapy via remodeling the matrix. Oncogene. 2023;42:2061–73.
Lou M, Iwatsuki M, Wu X, Zhang W, Matsumoto C, Baba H. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived IL-8 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer through the NF-kappaB pathway. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;31:2983–95.
Erez N, Glanz S, Raz Y, Avivi C, Barshack I. Cancer associated fibroblasts express pro-inflammatory factors in human breast and ovarian tumors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;437:397–402.
Huang W, Zhang L, Yang M, Wu X, Wang X, Huang W, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote the survival of irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via the NF-kappaB pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:87.
Ren Y, Cao L, Wang L, Zheng S, Zhang Q, Guo X, et al. Autophagic secretion of HMGB1 from cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes metastatic potential of non-small cell lung cancer cells via NFkappaB signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:858.
Karki R, Kanneganti TD. Diverging inflammasome signals in tumorigenesis and potential targeting. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:197–14.
Wu X, Sun L, Xu F. NF-kappaB in cell deaths, therapeutic resistance and nanotherapy of tumors: recent advances. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16:783.
Chalkidi N, Melissari M-T, Henriques A, Stavropoulou A, Kollias G, Koliaraki V. Activation and functions of Col6a1+ fibroblasts in colitis-associated cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:148.
Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Xia S, Kong Q, Li S, Liu X, et al. Gasdermin E suppresses tumour growth by activating anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2020;579:415–20.
Ou Z, Lin S, Qiu J, Ding W, Ren P, Chen D, et al. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics reveal the immunological microenvironment of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Adv Sci. 2022;9:e2203040.
Ene-Obong A, Clear AJ, Watt J, Wang J, Fatah R, Riches JC, et al. Activated pancreatic stellate cells sequester CD8+ T cells to reduce their infiltration of the juxtatumoral compartment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:1121–32.
Krishnamurty AT, Shyer JA, Thai M, Gandham V, Buechler MB, Yang YA, et al. LRRC15(+) myofibroblasts dictate the stromal setpoint to suppress tumour immunity. Nature. 2022;611:148–54.
Lakins MA, Ghorani E, Munir H, Martins CP, Shields JD. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce antigen-specific deletion of CD8 (+) T Cells to protect tumour cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9:948.
Wang W, Green M, Choi JE, Gijon M, Kennedy PD, Johnson JK, et al. CD8(+) T cells regulate tumour ferroptosis during cancer immunotherapy. Nature. 2019;569:270–4.
Wang Q, Wang Y, Ding J, Wang C, Zhou X, Gao W, et al. A bioorthogonal system reveals antitumour immune function of pyroptosis. Nature. 2020;579:421–6.
Xia H, Green DR, Zou W. Autophagy in tumour immunity and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21:281–97.
Sun EW, Shi YF. Apoptosis: the quiet death silences the immune system. Pharm Ther. 2001;92:135–45.
Lynch C, Panagopoulou M, Gregory CD. Extracellular vesicles arising from apoptotic cells in tumors: roles in cancer pathogenesis and potential clinical applications. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1174.
Li M, Liao L, Tian W. Extracellular vesicles derived from apoptotic cells: an essential link between death and regeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:573511.
Kim HJ, Yang K, Kim K, Lee YJ, Lee S, Ahn SY, et al. Reprogramming of cancer-associated fibroblasts by apoptotic cancer cells inhibits lung metastasis via Notch1-WISP-1 signaling. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:1373–91.
Gautheron J, Gores GJ, Rodrigues CMP. Lytic cell death in metabolic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2020;73:394–408.
Place DE, Kanneganti TD. Cell death-mediated cytokine release and its therapeutic implications. J Exp Med. 2019;216:1474–86.
Krysko DV, Garg AD, Kaczmarek A, Krysko O, Agostinis P, Vandenabeele P. Immunogenic cell death and DAMPs in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:860–75.
Erez N, Truitt M, Olson P, Arron ST, Hanahan D. Cancer-associated fibroblasts are activated in incipient neoplasia to orchestrate tumor-promoting inflammation in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:135–47.
Pellegrini L, Foglio E, Pontemezzo E, Germani A, Russo MA, Limana F. HMGB1 and repair: focus on the heart. Pharm Ther. 2019;196:160–82.
Tang D, Kang R, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT. The multifunctional protein HMGB1: 50 years of discovery. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23:824–41.
Chen Y, Cai L, Guo X, Li Z, Liao X, Zhang X, et al. HMGB1-activated fibroblasts promote breast cancer cells metastasis via RAGE/aerobic glycolysis. Neoplasma. 2021;68:71–78.
Vasudevan SO, Behl B, Rathinam VA. Pyroptosis-induced inflammation and tissue damage. Semin Immunol. 2023;69:101781.
Wei X, Xie F, Zhou X, Wu Y, Yan H, Liu T, et al. Role of pyroptosis in inflammation and cancer. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:971–92.
Hou J, Hsu JM, Hung MC. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis in inflammation and antitumor immunity. Mol Cell. 2021;81:4579–90.
Schauer IG, Zhang J, Xing Z, Guo X, Mercado-Uribe I, Sood AK, et al. Interleukin-1beta promotes ovarian tumorigenesis through a p53/NF-kappaB-mediated inflammatory response in stromal fibroblasts. Neoplasia. 2013;15:409–20.
Koncina E, Nurmik M, Pozdeev VI, Gilson C, Tsenkova M, Begaj R, et al. IL1R1(+) cancer-associated fibroblasts drive tumor development and immunosuppression in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4251.
Jiang F, Jia K, Chen Y, Ji C, Chong X, Li Z, et al. ANO1-mediated inhibition of cancer ferroptosis confers immunotherapeutic resistance through recruiting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Adv Sci. 2023;2023:e2300881.
Chandra JB, Sarkar S, Rout L, Mandal M. The transformation of cancer-associated fibroblasts: current perspectives on the role of TGF-beta in CAF mediated tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. Cancer Lett. 2021;520:222–32.
Peng D, Fu M, Wang M, Wei Y, Wei X. Targeting TGF-beta signal transduction for fibrosis and cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:104.
Yang D, Liu J, Qian H, Zhuang Q. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: from basic science to anticancer therapy. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55:1322–32.
Rimal R, Desai P, Daware R, Hosseinnejad A, Prakash J, Lammers T, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: origin, function, imaging, and therapeutic targeting. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;189:114504.
Froeling FE, Feig C, Chelala C, Dobson R, Mein CE, Tuveson DA, et al. Retinoic acid-induced pancreatic stellate cell quiescence reduces paracrine Wnt-beta-catenin signaling to slow tumor progression. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1486–97.
Sherman MH, Yu RT, Engle DD, Ding N, Atkins AR, Tiriac H, et al. Vitamin D receptor-mediated stromal reprogramming suppresses pancreatitis and enhances pancreatic cancer therapy. Cell. 2014;159:80–93.
Levy JMM, Towers CG, Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:528–42.
Sotelo J, Briceno E, Lopez-Gonzalez MA. Adding chloroquine to conventional treatment for glioblastoma multiforme: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:337–43.
Boone BA, Bahary N, Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Normolle DP, Wu WC, et al. Safety and biologic response of pre-operative autophagy inhibition in combination with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4402–10.
Sari D, Gozuacik D, Akkoc Y. Role of autophagy in cancer-associated fibroblast activation, signaling and metabolic reprograming. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1274682.
Tekedereli I, Alpay SN, Akar U, Yuca E, Ayugo-Rodriguez C, Han HD, et al. Therapeutic silencing of Bcl-2 by systemically administered siRNA nanotherapeutics inhibits tumor growth by autophagy and apoptosis and enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy in orthotopic xenograft models of ER (-) and ER (+) breast cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2013;2:e121.
Liu Z, Shi A, Song D, Han B, Zhang Z, Ma L, et al. Resistin confers resistance to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells through autophagy induction. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:574–83.
Acknowledgements
Figures were created using BioRender.com. Retrieved from https://app.biorender.com.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos: 82303598, 82103787), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: LQ24H160033).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Manuscript writing (original draft): CC and JL. Conceptualization and supervision: CC and SH. Manuscript review and editing: XL and AX. Manuscript revise: QY and JG. Figures editing: TR and JX. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for publication
All authors agreed to publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, C., Liu, J., Lin, X. et al. Crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and regulated cell death in tumors: insights into apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis. Cell Death Discov. 10, 189 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-01958-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-01958-9
- Springer Nature Limited