Abstract
Discovery of two dimensional (2D) magnets, showing intrinsic ferromagnetic (FM) or antiferromagnetic (AFM) orders, has accelerated development of novel 2D spintronics, in which all the key components are made of van der Waals (vdW) materials and their heterostructures. High-performing and energy-efficient spin functionalities have been proposed, often relying on current-driven manipulation and detection of the spin states. In this regard, metallic vdW magnets are expected to have several advantages over the widely-studied insulating counterparts, but have not been much explored due to the lack of suitable materials. Here, we report tunable itinerant ferro- and antiferromagnetism in Co-doped Fe4GeTe2 utilizing the vdW interlayer coupling, extremely sensitive to the material composition. This leads to high TN antiferromagnetism of TN ~ 226 K in a bulk and ~210 K in 8 nm-thick nanoflakes, together with tunable magnetic anisotropy. The resulting spin configurations and orientations are sensitively controlled by doping, magnetic field, and thickness, which are effectively read out by electrical conduction. These findings manifest strong merits of metallic vdW magnets as an active component of vdW spintronic applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Van der Waals (vdW) magnets1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 offer an intrinsic magnetic multilayer system with various types of magnetic ground states1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. Among them, the interlayer antiferromagnetism with an antiparallel spin configuration across the vdW gap is known to be effectively controlled by magnetic and electric fields, pressure, or doping7,8,9,10. This leads to various spin-functionalities, particularly for antiferromagnetic (AFM) spintronics, which have gained a lot of attraction recently due to their advantageous properties over ferromagnetic (FM) spintronics, including negligible stray field, robustness against magnetic perturbation, and ultrafast spin dynamics29,30,31,32. In contrast to the so-called synthetic AFM multilayers, where FM and non-magnetic (NM) layers are stacked alternately using the thin-film deposition techniques29, vdW antiferromagnets have a highly crystalline and atomically flat interface, free from interface roughness or chemical intermixing. This may lead to highly transparent and uniform magnetic proximity interaction for better spintronic performance in the magnetic multilayers, made of vdW antiferromagnets than synthetic AFM thin films.
One key issue for vdW material-based AFM spintronics is to identify suitable candidate materials. Most of the known vdW antiferromagnets are insulating4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16, and their interlayer magnetic coupling is mainly through superexchange-like interaction11,12,13. Thus, the modulation of interlayer coupling usually requires structural modification9,10,11,12,13,14 and is relatively difficult as compared to synthetic antiferromagnets with the interlayer Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida (RKKY) coupling29. Obviously, metallic vdW antiferromagnets17,18,19,20 can be a good alternative. The conduction electrons mediate the interlayer interaction, similar to synthetic antiferromagnets, which is expected to be strongly modulated by changing the composition or the interlayer distance. Furthermore, their longitudinal or transverse conductivities are sensitive to the spin configurations33,34,35,36,37,38, offering a direct probe to the spin states even for a few nanometer-thick crystals. Despite these merits, metallic vdW antiferromagnets are rare in nature, except a few recent examples of GdTe3 and MnBi2Te4 showing a low Neel temperature TN <30 K17,18,19,20. Here, we show that an iron-based vdW material, Fe4GeTe2 with Co doping, hosts the interlayer AFM phase with TN ~226 K in a bulk and ~210 K in 8-nm-thick nanoflakes. Its spin configuration is found to be effectively controlled and read out by conduction electrons, endowing Co-doped Fe4GeTe2 with a promising role in vdW-material-based spintronics.
Results
High-T N antiferromagnetism in vdW structure
We consider iron-based metallic vdW ferromagnets FenGeTe2 (n = 3–5) as a vdW analog of the synthetic multilayer systems (Fig. 1a)21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. The first known member, Fe3GeTe2, is experimentally identified as a ferromagnet with Tc = 220 K21,22,23,24,25, but is theoretically predicted to be interlayer AFM via RKKY-like interaction39. The interlayer AFM coupling is, however, extremely fragile to the small amount of defects or dopants39, and the AFM phase is mostly inaccessible in real compounds. An alternative candidate is Fe4GeTe2, recently identified as a high Tc metallic ferromagnet with Tc = 270 K26. Because of the relatively thick slabs containing two Fe–Fe dumbbells (Fig. 1b), it has stronger intralayer FM coupling than Fe3GeTe2, together with the interlayer FM coupling, confirmed theoretically and experimentally26. By replacing 1/3 of Fe atoms with Co atoms, however, we found that it becomes AFM, as evidenced by its temperature-dependent susceptibility χ(T) under a magnetic field H = 100 Oe along the c-axis (Fig. 1c). Hereafter (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 denotes the AFM compound (Fe1 − xCox)4GeTe2 (x = 0.33) unless the doping level x is otherwise specified. A clear cusp in χ(T), taken during the zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC), reveals AFM transition at the Neel temperature TN = 210 K. The temperature-dependent resistivity ρ(T) is metallic with an upturn at low temperatures due to Kondo scattering (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. S8). The conductivity of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 is ~3 × 105 Ω−1 m−1, which is comparable with that of the pristine Fe4GeTe226 and in the bad metal regime (Supplementary Fig. S8). These characteristics make (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 a unique vdW AFM metal with the high TN among vdW antiferromagnets (Supplementary Table S1).
The crystal structure of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 is the same as Fe4GeTe2 in a rhombohedral structure (space group \(R\overline{3}m\)). Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 crystal visualizes the structural units of Fe–Fe dumbbells alternately above and below the plane of Ge atoms (Fig. 1d). These Fe–Fe–Ge–Fe–Fe layers are encapsulated with Te atoms, which shows a similar structural tendency to the pristine Fe4GeTe2 (the inset in Fig. 1d). A clear vdW gap between the layers is observed without any signature of stacking change or intercalated atoms throughout a wide region. These results imply that Co atoms are dominantly substituted to the Fe sites, not in a type of the interstitial sites. In Fig. 1e, electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analysis visualizes the chemical information within a monolayer, which represents that Co atoms are homogeneously doped in all the Fe sites. Co doping results in the reduction of both the in-plane (a = 4.08 ± 0.04 Å) and out-of-plane lattice parameters (c = 29.10 ± 0.28 Å), which are deducted from the selected area diffraction pattern (SADP) analysis, in good agreement with X-ray diffraction results (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Doping-dependent evolution of magnetic phases
Having established the high-TN AFM phase in (Fe,Co)4GeTe2, we focus on the systematic changes of the magnetic and electrical properties of (Fe1 − xCox)4GeTe2 single crystals with a variation of Co doping (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.39). For x = 0, the FM transition with in-plane alignment of magnetic moments occurs at Tc = 270 K, which is followed by the spin-reorientation transition to the out-of-plane alignment at TSR = 110 K (Fig. 2a)26. Co doping quickly suppresses the spin-reorientation transition, while keeping the FM transition almost intact with a nearly constant Tc for x ≤ 0.23 (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). Upon further Co doping, however, the AFM order develops from TN = 155 K, well below Tc for x = 0.26, and eventually becomes dominant with high TN up to 226 K for x = 0.39 (Fig. 2d–f). The negligible bifurcation between χ(T) curves taken during ZFC and FC is consistent with the long-range AFM phase. The saturation magnetization Msat monotonically decreases with Co doping from 7.1μB/f.u. (x = 0) to 5.5μB/f.u. (x = 0.39) due to the magnetic dilution effect (Fig. 2g). Concomitantly, the out-of-plane saturation field \({H}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{c}\) gradually increases with Co doping in the FM phases for x < 0.26. This is consistent with the changes of the magnetic anisotropic energy (K) from the easy-axis to the easy-plane types, following \({H}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{c} = 2K/M_{\mathrm{sat}}\) (Fig. 2i). Entering the AFM phase, however, \({H}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{c}\) is determined by the AFM coupling J as described by \({H}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{c}\) ≈ 2J/Msat and thus suddenly enhanced up to ~6 T for x = 0.39. In the AFM phase, the spin-flop transition is observed for H∥ab at x = 0.33, but H∥c at x = 0.39 (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. S6), indicating the easy-plane and the easy-axis type spin alignments, respectively. For x = 0.39, we found that another magnetic transition occurs to the unknown phase below T = 90 K (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. S2). The resulting phase diagram is summarized in Fig. 3a, which manifests that the magnetic configuration and also the magnetic anisotropy of (Fe1 − xCox)4GeTe2 are highly sensitive to Co doping.
The first-principles calculations consistently predict the FM-to-AFM phase transition with Co doping. Total energy calculations for the FM and various AFM phases confirm that the FM phase is initially stable at low x, but eventually becomes unstable against the AFM phase at high x. The most stable AFM phase is the so-called A-type, in which all the spin moments in the whole slab of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 are ferromagnetically aligned, but across the vdW gap, they are antiferromagnetically coupled. This is consistent with the positive Curie–Weiss temperature from the inverse susceptibility in the AFM phase, suggesting the dominant FM interaction within the layers (Supplementary Fig. S3). Furthermore, from resonant soft X-ray scattering experiments for Fe L3-edge, we observed the magnetic Bragg peak at q = (0 0 3/2) developed below TN for the crystal with x = 0.33. This confirms the A-type AFM structure, as predicted by calculations (Supplementary Fig. S7). Figure 3c shows the total energy difference ΔE = EFM − EAFM as a function of Co doping x, assuming a random distribution of Co dopants over all Fe sites. The FM-to-AFM transition occurs at the critical doping level xc ~ 0.2 (Fig. 3a). The estimated xc as well as Msat from calculations (Fig. 3b, c) is in reasonable agreement with experiments. These results indicate that the evolution of the magnetic phase with Co doping is well captured by first-principles calculations.
Detailed band structure calculations reveal that Co doping affects significantly the density-of-states (DOS) near the Fermi level. In the nonmagnetic calculations, we found a strong DOS peak in the vicinity of the Fermi level (Supplementary Fig. S9). The resulting strong Stoner instability favors the ferromagnetism within the layer, and the ferromagnetically aligned moment at each layer can be treated as a single localized Heisenberg spin, coupled through the interlayer coupling. This interlayer coupling is, however, determined by a subtle balance of pair exchange interactions between Fe/Co atoms across the vdW gap, which is sensitive to the details in the states at the Fermi level. Using total energy calculations on various interlayer spin configurations (Supplementary Fig. S10) and comparing with the classical Heisenberg Hamiltonian, we extracted the interlayer exchange interaction Jinter depending on the layer separation (d). We found the oscillatory behavior of Jinter(d), well described by the RKKY model40 (Fig. 3d). The systematic changes of Jinter(d) with Co doping, particularly between the nearest-neighboring layers, determine the stability of the AFM phase. These results contrast to the case of insulating vdW antiferromagnets, in which the changes in the interlayer coupling from the FM to AFM types require the stacking modifications9,10,11,12,13,14, and manifest the important role of conduction electrons to control the spin configurations of (Fe1 − xCox)4GeTe2.
Electrical detection of spin states
Conduction electrons are also important to probe the spin state of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2. With magnetic fields along the c-axis, normal to the preferred plane of the spin alignment, the moment at each layer of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 gradually rotates until its mean direction is parallel to the field at \({H}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{c}\). This out-of-plane spin canting can be monitored by the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) due to sizable spin–orbit coupling in (Fe,Co)4GeTe2. As shown in Fig. 4a, the Hall resistivity ρyx is dominated by the anomalous contribution \({\rho }_{yx}^{\mathrm{A}}\), i.e., ρyx ≈ \({\rho }_{yx}^{\mathrm{A}}\), and thus the transverse conductivity σyx = ρyx/(\({\rho }_{xx}^{2}\) + \({\rho }_{yx}^{2}\)) with a variation of magnetic field is nicely scaled with M(H). Moreover, the scaling factor SH = σyx/M is found to be almost independent of temperature (Supplementary Fig. S5), and thus σyx(H, T) can quantitatively measure the out-of-plane component of net magnetization M(H, T). For example, the magnetic susceptibility, estimated from χc(T) ∝ σyx(H)/H, allows for experimentally determining TN in nanoflakes (Fig. 5).
The orientation of the staggered magnetization in the plane, i.e., the Neel vector in the plane can also be effectively tracked by the electrical conductivity. Figure 4b shows the field-dependent magnetoresistance Δρ(H)/ρ(0) of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 crystal under different field orientations in the plane, H∥I and H⊥I against a current I∥a at various temperatures. Two characteristic fields, \({H}_{{\rm{SF}}}^{ab}\) and \({H}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{ab}\), are identified from clear kinks in both Δρ(H)/ρ(0) curves. The low field \({H}_{{\rm{SF}}}^{ab}\) corresponds to the spin–flop transition, at which the Neel vectors of all domains are fully aligned perpendicular to the in-plane field33,34,35,36,37,38. The Neel vector L is rotated by 90∘, from L⊥I to L∥I, by switching the in-plane magnetic field from H∥I to H⊥I (Fig. 4c). This leads to a difference in magnetoresistance due to spin–orbit coupling, which is known as the anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) \({{\Delta }}{\rho }_{{\rm{AMR}}}^{L}\) = ρL∥I − ρL⊥I. In (Fe,Co)4GeTe2, \({{\Delta }}{\rho }_{{\rm{AMR}}}^{L}\) reaches ~0.3%, comparable with other AFM metals33,34,35,36. With further increasing in-plane field, the moments are canted towards the field, until they are fully aligned at the saturation field \({H}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{ab}\). In this case, the AMR between the cases of M∥I or M⊥I, \({{\Delta }}{\rho }_{{\rm{AMR}}}^{M}\) = ρM∥I − ρM⊥I is also expected as found in ferromagnets41, 42. In (Fe,Co)4GeTe2, \({{\Delta }}{\rho }_{{\rm{AMR}}}^{L}\) and \({{\Delta }}{\rho }_{{\rm{AMR}}}^{M}\) are comparable in size and opposite in sign, inducing the sign cross of ΔρAMR as summarized in Fig. 4d. Therefore, the AMR allows the electrical access to the orientation of the Neel vector or the saturated magnetization in the plane. Therefore, by combining AHE and AMR we can effectively read out the spin state of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2.
Thickness-dependent magnetic phases
Finally, we discuss the thickness control of the magnetic state of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2. Owing to the weak vdW interlayer coupling, we obtained nanoflakes with thickness d down to seven layers (7L) for x = 0.33 and nine layers (9L) for x = 0.39, using mechanical exfoliation. In both cases, the in-plane resistivity ρ(T) shows the metallic behavior (~10−3 Ωcm) with a low-temperature upturn due to Kondo scattering, similar to the bulk case (Supplementary Figs. S12 and S13). In nanoflakes, we used the transverse conductivity σyx(H, T) to monitor the field and temperature-dependent magnetization M(H, T), as done in the bulk case (Fig. 4a). The resulting susceptibility χc(T) of nanoflakes (Fig. 5e, f and Supplementary Figs. S12 and S13) exhibits a clear kink, indicating the AFM transition at TN in both cases with x = 0.33 and 0.39.
The detailed thickness-dependent phase diagram is different with Co doping level x. For nanoflakes with x = 0.33, T decreases gradually from the bulk value with lowering thickness. In addition, in nanoflakes, we found a broad hump developed around T* in χc(T), which shifts to low temperatures with reducing thickness (Fig. 5e). This nonmonotonous temperature dependence of χc(T) implies that spin moments are not fully frozen by dominant AFM interaction in nanoflakes, due to additional competing FM interaction. With further reducing thickness to 7L, this competing FM interaction stabilizes the long-range FM order, evidenced by clear magnetic hysteresis of σyx(H) with a coercive field Hc = 0.21 T at T = 2 K (Fig. 5b). The Hc gradually decreases with increasing temperature up to Tc ≈ 25 K (Supplementary Fig. S12). The corresponding χc(T) exhibits no signature of AFM ordering but only a broad peak at T* ~ 40 K. The resulting phase diagram (Fig. 5g) reveals that thickness tuning offers another effective means to tune the interlayer FM and AFM interactions, even though the 2D limit is yet to be reached. It has been well established that vdW crystals expand along the c-axis by ~0.3–0.7%, 43, 44 when they are thinned to be tens of nanometer thick. Considering that the c-axis lattice constant shrinks by ~0.6% with Co doping of x = 0.39, this thinning-induced swelling affects significantly the magnetic ground state near the FM–AFM phase boundary.
In nanoflakes with higher Co doping of x = 0.39, located deep inside the AFM phase of the phase diagram (Fig. 3a), the AFM phase is expected to be more stable than the nanoflakes with x = 0.33. As shown in Fig. 5, this is indeed the case. Upon reducing the thickness down to 9L, we observed similar σyx(H) curves with those of the bulk (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. S5d). TN is also reduced slightly to ~210 K from its bulk value of 226 K, and the low-temperature transition at T0 is also maintained without significant change. At low temperatures, we observed the magnetic hysteresis (Fig. 5c, d and Supplementary Fig. S13), indicating the FM phase, as found in the case of x = 0.33. The resulting thickness-dependent phase diagram for x = 0.39 reveals that the AFM phase in the intermediate temperature range between T0 and TN is stable in nanoflakes. The spin–flop transition field HSF, however, is systematically reduced with lowering thickness (Supplementary Fig. S13f). These results clearly demonstrate that the stability of the AFM phase and the magnetic anisotropy can be controlled by thickness and doping levels in (Fe1 − xCox)4GeTe2.
Discussion
Our observations unequivocally show that (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 is an intrinsic high-TN AFM multilayers. Although its TN is still below room temperature, an order of magnitude enhancement of TN, as compared to other metallic vdW antiferromagnets17,18,19,20, is achieved by tuning the vdW interlayer coupling between the strongly FM layers of Fe4GeTe2. This approach can be applied to other recently discovered high-Tc vdW ferromagnets26,27,28, 42 to possibly realize the room temperature antiferromagnetism. Furthermore, (Fe1 − xCox)4GeTe2 hosts at least four different spin states in terms of interlayer spin configurations (FM and AFM) and spin orientations (in-plane and out-of-plane) while keeping the same stacking structure (Fig. 3a). The switching between these states, demonstrated using doping, magnetic field, and thickness control, can be more effectively achieved in vdW heterostructures through, e.g., the exchange-spring effect45, 46 with an adjacent FM vdW layer or the current-induced spin–orbit torque34, 37 with large SOC materials, as done in metal spintronics. The intimate coupling of the spin states to electrical conduction in (Fe, Co)4GeTe2 (Fig. 4a, b) ensures the electrical readout of the spin state. These strong controllability and readability on the spin states are the manifestation of itinerant magnetism, highly distinct from insulating vdW magnets. We, therefore, envision that metallic vdW antiferromagnets, including (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 in this work, will enrich the material candidates and the spin functionalities for all vdW material-based spintronics.
Methods
Single-crystal growth and characterization
Single crystals were grown by a chemical vapor transport method using pre-synthesized polycrystalline sample and iodine as a transport agent. The obtained single crystals had plate-like shape with a typical size of ~1 × 1 × 0.04 mm3. The high crystallinity of single crystals was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (Supplementary Fig. S1). From the energy-dispersive spectroscopy measurements, we confirmed a systematic variation of Co doping x, in the presence of Te deficiency by ~10% and excess of the total (Fe, Co) content by ~5%, similar to pristine Fe4GeTe226. Magnetization was measured under magnetic field along the c-axis or ab-plane using a superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer (MPMS, Quantum Design) and vibrating sample magnetometer option of Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS-14T, Quantum Design). The in-plane resistivity and the Hall resistivity were measured in the standard six probe configuration using a Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS-9T, Quantum Design).
Device fabrication
Using mechanical exfoliation in the inert argon atmosphere (H2O < 0.1 p.p.m., O2 < 0.1 p.p.m.), we obtained nanoflakes of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 on top of Si/SiO2 substrate, pre-treated by oxygen plasma (O2 = 10 s.c.c.m., P ~ 100 mTorr) for 5 min to remove adsorbates on the surface. The exfoliated crystal is then subsequently covered by a thin h-BN flake to prevent oxidation during device fabrication. Typically (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 flakes are of several tens of μm2 in the area and down to ~7 nm (~7L) in thickness, estimated by the atomic force microscopy measurements (Supplementary Fig. S11). To make electrodes for transport measurements, we employed an electron beam lithography technique, using poly(methyl methacrylate)-positive resist layer, which was spin-coated and dried in vacuum at room temperature. After etching, the patterned area of the covered h-BN flake with CF4 plasma, Cr(10 nm)/Au(50 nm), is deposited on the exposed surface of the nanoflake.
STEM and EELS
STEM samples were made along [1 1 0] projections, which show the most distinguishable atomic structures. Samples were prepared with dual-beam focused ion beam systems (Helios and Helios G3, FEI). Different acceleration voltage conditions from 30 to 1 keV were used to make a thin sample with less damages. The subsequent Ar ion milling process was performed with low energy (PIPS II, Gatan Inc., USA). The atomic structure was observed using a STEM (JEM-ARM200F, JEOL, Japan) at 200 kV equipped with a fifth-order probe corrector (ASCOR, CEOS GmbH, Germany) at Materials Imaging & Analysis Center of POSTECH in Republic of Korea. The electron probe size was ~0.8 Å, and the high-angle annular dark-field detector angle was fixed from 68 to 280 mrad. The SADP was obtained using a TEM (JEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan) at 200 kV equipped with a spherical aberration corrector (CEOS GmbH, Germany). The raw STEM images were compensated with ten slices by SmartAlign and processed using a band-pass difference filter with a local window to reduce background noise (SmartAlign and Filters Pro, HREM Research Inc., Japan). For EELS analysis, we utilized another STEM (JEM-2100F, JEOL) with a spherical aberration corrector (CEOS GmbH) equipped with an EEL spectrometer (GIF Quantum ER, Gatan, USA). The used probe size was ~1.0 Å under 200 kV and the chemical analysis was performed by using a Spectrum Image via the STEM mode. The obtained spectral data from a spectral image were filtered to intensify the Fe-, Co-, and Te-edge signals by MSA (Multivariate Statistical Analysis, HREM Research Inc., Japan).
Scanning tunneling microscopy
The surface of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 was characterized by the scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) on a single crystal. The single crystal is first cleaved in a high vacuum (~1 × 10−8 torr) to obtain the clean surface and then is transferred to ultra-high vacuum (~1 × 10−11 torr) for the STM measurements at 77 K.
First-principles calculations
Electronic structure calculations were performed using a full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method, implemented in WIEN2K package 47. Experimental lattice constants of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2 are used and exchange-correlation potential is chosen to the generalized gradient approximation of Perdew–Berke–Ernzerhof48. Assuming that Co is doped at all Fe sites homogeneously throughout the Fe4GeTe2 layer, the virtual crystal approximation is considered in the DFT calculation of (Fe,Co)4GeTe2.
Soft X-ray scattering
Resonant soft X-ray scattering experiment was carried out in 6A MPK MeXiM beamline, PAL. The single crystals were cleaved in the air and thereafter immediately transferred to the chamber with the ultra-high vacuum pressure of ~8 × 10−9 torr. Photon energy was selected near the Fe L3-edge absorption energy value at 707.5 eV, because q = (0 0 3/2) peak has a different energy profile with (0 0 3) Bragg peak.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on request.
References
Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J. G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018).
Gibertini, M., Koperski, M., Morpurgo, A. F. & Novoselov, K. S. Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 408–419 (2019).
Gong, C. & Zhang, X. Two-dimensional magnetic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices. Science 363, eaav4450 (2019).
Susner, M. A., Chyasnavichyus, M., McGuire, M. A., Ganesh, P. & Maksymovych, P. Metal thio- and selenophosphates as multifunctional van der Waals layered materials. Adv. Mater. 29, 1602852 (2017).
Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017).
Song, T. et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-flter van der Waals heterostructures. Science 360, 1214–1218 (2018).
Huang, B. et al. Electrical control of 2D magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 544–548 (2018).
Jiang, S., Li, L., Wang, Z., Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Controlling magnetism in 2D CrI3 by electrostatic doping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 549–553 (2018).
Li, T. et al. Pressure-controlled interlayer magnetism in atomically thin CrI3. Nat. Mater. 18, 1303–1308 (2019).
Song, T. et al. Switching 2D magnetic states via pressure tuning of layer stacking. Nat. Mater. 18, 1298–1302 (2019).
Sivadas, N., Okamoto, S., Xu, X., Fennie, C. J. & Xiao, D. Stacking-dependent magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Nano Lett. 18, 7658–7664 (2018).
Jiang, P. et al. Stacking tunable interlayer magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Phys. Rev. B 99, 144401 (2019).
Jang, S. W., Jeong, M. Y., Yoon, H., Ryee, S. & Han, M. J. Microscopic understanding of magnetic interactions in bilayer CrI3. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 1–6 (2019).
Chen, W. et al. Direct observation of van der Waals stacking dependent interlayer magnetism. Science 366, 983–987 (2019).
Wang, Z. et al. Determining the phase diagram of atomically thin layered antiferromagnet CrCl3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 1116–1122 (2019).
McGuire, M. A. et al. Antiferromagnetism in the van der Waals layered spin-lozenge semiconductor CrTe3. Phys. Rev. B 95, 144421 (2017).
Lei, S. et al. High mobility in a van der Waals layered antiferromagnetic metal. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay6407 (2020).
Otrokov, M. M. et al. Prediction and observation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator. Nature 576, 416–422 (2019).
Deng, Y. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4. Science 367, 895–900 (2020).
Wu, J. et al. Natural van der Waals heterostructural single crystals with both magnetic and topological properties. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax9989 (2019).
Deiseroth, H.-J., Aleksandrov, K., Reiner, C., Kienle, L. & Kremer, R. K. Fe3GeTe2 and Ni3GeTe2 - two new layered transition-metal compounds: crystal structures, HRTEM investigations, and magnetic and electrical properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 1561–1567 (2006).
Chen, B. et al. Magnetic properties of layered itinerant electron ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 82, 124711 (2013).
Deng, Y. et al. Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2. Nature 563, 94–99 (2018).
Kim, K. et al. Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal. Nat. Mater. 17, 794–799 (2018).
Fei, Z. et al. Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2. Nat. Mater. 17, 778–782 (2018).
Seo, J. et al. Nearly room temperature ferromagnetism in a magnetic metal-rich van der Waals metal. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay8912 (2020).
Stahl, J., Shlaen, E. & Johrendt, D. The van der Waals ferromagnets Fe5−δGeTe2 and Fe5−δ−xNixGeTe2 - crystal structure, stacking faults, and magnetic properties. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 644, 1923–1929 (2018).
May, A. F. et al. Ferromagnetism near room temperature in the cleavable van der Waals crystal Fe5GeTe2. ACS Nano 13, 4436–4442 (2019).
Duine, R. A., Lee, K. J., Parkin, S. S. P. & Stiles, M. D. Synthetic antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Phys. 14, 217–219 (2018).
Jungwirth, T., Marti, X., Wadley, P. & Wunderlich, J. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231–241 (2016).
Baltz, V. et al. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 15005 (2018).
Zelezny, J., Wadley, P., Olejnik, K., Hoffmann, A. & Ohno, H. Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices. Nat. Phys. 14, 220–228 (2018).
Marti, X. et al. Room-temperature antiferromagnetic memory resistor. Nat. Mater. 13, 367–374 (2014).
Wadley, P. et al. Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet. Science 351, 587–590 (2016).
Galceran, R. et al. Isothermal anisotropic magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic metallic IrMn. Sci. Rep. 6, 35471 (2016).
Kriegner, D. et al. Multiple-stable anisotropic magnetoresistance memory in antiferromagnetic MnTe. Nat. Commun. 7, 11623 (2016).
Bodnar, S. Y. et al. Writing and reading antiferromagnetic Mn2Au by Neel spin-orbit torques and large anisotropic magnetoresistance. Nat. Commun. 9, 348 (2018).
Wang, H. et al. Giant anisotropic magnetoresistance and nonvolatile memory in canted antiferromagnet Sr2IrO4. Nat. Commun. 10, 2280 (2019).
Jang, S. W. et al. Origin of ferromagnetism and the effect of doping on Fe3GeTe2. Nanoscale 12, 13501–13506 (2020).
Ruderman, M. A. & Kittel, C. I. Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons. Phys. Rev. 96, 99–102 (1954).
Takata, F., Kabara, K., Ito, K., Tsunoda, M. & Suemasu, T. Negative anisotropic magnetoresistance resulting from minority spin transport in NixFe4−xN (x = 1 and 3) epitaxial films. J. Appl. Phys. 121, 023903 (2017).
Sun, X. et al. Room temperature ferromagnetism in ultra-thin van der Waals crystals of 1T-CrTe2. Nano Res. 13, 3358–3363 (2020).
Yoshida, M. et al. Controlling charge-density-wave states in nano-thick crystals of 1T-TaS2. Sci. Rep. 4, 7302 (2014).
Yoshida, M. et al. Extended polymorphism of two-dimensional material. Nano Lett. 17, 5567–5571 (2017).
Park, B. G. et al. A spin-valve-like magnetoresistance of an antiferromagnetbased tunnel junction. Nat. Mater. 10, 347–351 (2011).
Fina, I. et al. Anisotropic magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 5, 4671 (2014).
Blaha, A. P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G. K. H., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. WIEN2k, an Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwartz, 2001).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We thank H.W. Lee, K. Kim, M.H. Jo for fruitful discussion. We also thank H. G. Kim in Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL) for the technical support. This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) through the Center for Artificial Low Dimensional Electronic Systems (no. IBS-R014-D1), by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through SRC (Grant No. 2018R1A5A6075964), the Max Planck-POSTECH Center for Complex Phase Materials (Grant No. 2016K1A4A4A01922028), and also by the NRF (No. NRF-2019R1A2C1089017, No. 2020R1A5A1019141, and No. 2020M3H4A2084418). S.-Y.C. acknowledges the support of the Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials by the NRF (Grant No. 2013M3A6B1078872). K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan, Grant Number JPMXP0112101001, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20H00354, and the CREST (JPMJCR15F3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.S.K., E.S.A., and J.S. conceived the experiments. J.S. synthesized the bulk crystals. E.S.A. and G.S.C. carried out device fabrication and measurements on nanoflakes. J.S., M.C., and Y.J.J performed the transport property measurements on bulk crystals. T.P. and J.H.S. performed the electronic structure calculations and the analysis. S.-Y.H., G.-Y.K., K.S., and S.-Y.C. carried out structural and chemical identification using scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy. W.-s.N., J.Y.K., and J.-H.P. carried out resonant soft X-ray scattering experiments. E.O. and H.W.Y. performed surface characterization using scanning tunneling microscopy measurements. K.W. and T.T provided boron nitride crystals. J.S., E.S.A., T.P., S.-Y.C., J.H.S., and J.S.K. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Seo, J., An, E.S., Park, T. et al. Tunable high-temperature itinerant antiferromagnetism in a van der Waals magnet. Nat Commun 12, 2844 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23122-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23122-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions for spintronics
npj Spintronics (2024)
-
Two-dimensional magnetic materials for spintronic applications
Nano Research (2024)
-
Spin-flip-driven anomalous Hall effect and anisotropic magnetoresistance in a layered Ising antiferromagnet
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Magnetic anisotropy, exchange coupling and Dzyaloshinskii—Moriya interaction of two-dimensional magnets
Frontiers of Physics (2023)
-
Spin-flip-driven reversal of the angle-dependent magnetic torque in layered antiferromagnetic Ca0.9Sr0.1Co2As2
Scientific Reports (2022)