Abstract
Meiotic crossovers are limited in number and are prevented from occurring close to each other by crossover interference. In many species, crossover number is subject to sexual dimorphism, and a lower crossover number is associated with shorter chromosome axes lengths. How this patterning is imposed remains poorly understood. Here, we show that overexpression of the Arabidopsis pro-crossover protein HEI10 increases crossovers but maintains some interference and sexual dimorphism. Disrupting the synaptonemal complex by mutating ZYP1 also leads to an increase in crossovers but, in contrast, abolishes interference and disrupts the link between chromosome axis length and crossovers. Crucially, combining HEI10 overexpression and zyp1 mutation leads to a massive and unprecedented increase in crossovers. These observations support and can be predicted by, a recently proposed model in which HEI10 diffusion along the synaptonemal complex drives a coarsening process leading to well-spaced crossover-promoting foci, providing a mechanism for crossover patterning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A hallmark of sexual reproduction is the shuffling of homologous chromosomes by meiotic crossovers (COs). COs are produced by the repair of DNA double-strand breaks through two biochemical pathways: Class I COs are produced by a meiotic-specific pathway catalyzed by the ZMM proteins (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Zip1-4, Msh4-5, and Mer3; HEI10 is the Arabidopsis homolog of Zip2) and represent most COs; Class II COs originate from a minor pathway that uses structure-specific DNA nucleases also implicated in DNA repair in somatic cells. Despite an excess of initial double-strand breaks at meiosis, the number of resulting COs is limited, typically to one to three per chromosome pair. Class I COs are subject to additional tight constraints: At least one class I CO occurs per chromosome pair at each meiosis, the so-called obligate CO that ensures balanced chromosome distribution. Class I COs are also prevented from occurring next to each other on the same chromosome, a phenomenon called CO interference. How this interference is achieved mechanistically has been debated for over a century1,2,3,4,5,6.
One specific unresolved question is the role of the synaptonemal complex (SC) in CO interference. The SC is a zipper-like tripartite structure composed of two lateral chromosome axes, along which arrays of chromatin loops of each of the two homologous chromosomes are anchored, and a central part consisting of transverse filaments that connect the axes all along their length at meiotic prophase. Assessing the role of the SC in interference is difficult because in many organisms the transverse filament protein is essential for the formation of class I COs6. One notable exception is Arabidopsis thaliana, where the transverse filament protein is not required for class I CO formation, providing a unique opportunity to analyze the role of the SC in CO patterning. In the zyp1 mutant, class I COs form at a higher frequency than wild type and completely lack interference, demonstrating that the central part of the SC is, directly or indirectly, essential for imposing CO interference in Arabidopsis7,8. Reduced expression of the transverse element in C. elegans and specific mutations of the SC component that uncouple SC and CO formation in budding yeast lead to a reduction of interference, supporting a conserved role of the SC in imposing interference9,10,11,12. Interestingly in some species, such as humans and Arabidopsis, CO number differs in males and females. This heterochiasmy correlates with axis/SC length, with the number of COs proportional to axis length13,14,15. CO interference appears to propagate at a similar axis/SC distance (µm) in both sexes, which means that interference acts over greater genomic ranges (DNA) in the sex with a shorter axis/SC15,16, an observation that shows that the relevant space for the mechanism of interference is the axis/SC length.
A model was recently elaborated to account for class I CO patterning and interference, based on diffusion of the ZMM protein HEI10 (ZHP-3/4 in C.elegans) within the SC and a coarsening process leading to well-spaced CO-promoting HEI10 foci17,18. HEI10, which encodes a E3 ubiquitin ligase, initially forms multiple small foci along the SC and is progressively consolidated into a small number of large foci that co-localize with CO sites in diverse species19,20,21,22. Further, as predicted by the model, CO numbers depend on HEI10 dosage in Arabidopsis18,23. Interference is abolished in the absence of the transverse filament of the synaptonemal complex ZYP17,8, which is compatible with the idea that diffusion of HEI10 along the central part of the SC underlies CO patterning and interference.
Here, we explore the mechanisms of CO patterning in Arabidopsis by analyzing the combinatory effects of axis/SC length (male vs. female), modification of HEI10 dosage, and disruption of the SC on COs. We show that overexpressing HEI10 in zyp1 completely deregulates class I COs, with a massive increase of their number in both females and males. Our results support the model in which HEI10 coarsening by diffusion along the SC mediates CO patterning and imposes CO interference.
Results and discussion
Experimental approach
To decipher CO control, we studied the number and distribution of COs in both female and male meiosis when overexpressing HEI10 (well-characterized C2 line23), in the absence of the synaptonemal complex (zyp1), and in combination. We measured the number of class I COs in meiocytes by counting the number of MLH1-HEI10 co-foci at diplotene (Fig. 1A, B, Supplementary Fig. 1). In the pure line Col, we analyzed six genotypes: wild type and zyp1-1 combined with three dosages or HEI10 (wild type, heterozygous or homozygous for the HEI10oe C2 transgene). In the Col/Ler F1 hybrid, we analyzed four genotypes: wild type and zyp1-1/zyp1-6 combined with two dosages of HEI10 (wild type and heterozygous for the C2 HEI10 transgene) (Fig. 1A, B). The four hybrid genotypes were also used to characterize the CO number and distribution by sequencing populations derived from female and male crosses to Col (Figs. 1C–F, 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2–10, Supplementary Data 1).
Overexpression of HEI10 increases COs but maintains heterochiasmy
In wild type, the number of MLH1 foci is higher in males than females in both the inbreds and the hybrids (ratio male/female = 1.8 and 1.6, respectively. Figure 1A, B). Whole-genome sequencing of male- and female-derived hybrid progenies showed that CO numbers detected genetically are higher in male meiosis than in female meiosis (Fig. 1D, ratio = 1.6, p < 0.001, Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3), confirming heterochiasmy. The number of MLH1 foci at male meiosis is higher in wild type Col than in Col/Ler. Analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in a Col/Ler population previously revealed that the Col HEI10 allele is associated with higher recombination levels, suggesting that at least a part of this difference in MLH1 counts can be attributed to a difference in HEI10 activity23. In wild type female, the MLH1 foci numbers are not significantly different between Col and Col/Ler and close to the minimum of one per chromosome (7.2 and 6.8 foci for five chromosomes). In the presence of a transgene ectopically overexpressing HEI10 (HEI10oe C2 line23, homozygous), the number of MLH1 foci is increased ~two-fold in both sexes, in both Col and Col/Ler. Heterozygosity for the HEI10oe transgene also increases MLH1 foci number, but slightly less than homozygosity, confirming the effect of HEI10 dosage on recombination18,23 and suggesting that the level of HEI10 in the C2 line is close to saturation. Importantly, increases provoked by HEI10 dosage modulation are similar in males and females, leading to more MLH1 foci in males than females (p = 0.0001) (Fig. 1B). This was confirmed with progeny sequencing in hybrids, which revealed a 2.1-fold increase of COs in HEI10oe female and male, compared with wild type (p < 10-15, Fig. 1D–F, Supplementary Fig. 3). The ratio of male vs. female COs is maintained at 1.6 in HEI10oe (p < 10-15). In summary, overexpressing HEI10 provokes a doubling of class I COs in both female and male, maintaining heterochiasmy.
ZYP1 mutation increases COs and abolishes heterochiasmy
Mutating the transverse filament of the SC ZYP1 also increases MLH1 foci number (Fig. 1B). In Col zyp1, compared to wild type, the numbers increased 1.4-fold in males, consistent with previous findings7,8, and 2.3-fold in females. In the Col/Ler hybrid, the numbers increased by 1.2-fold in male and 1.8-fold in females. In contrast to HEI10oe, MLH1 foci number, which marks specifically class I COs, is no longer significantly different in males versus females both in Col and Col/Ler (p > 0.6). This is consistent with genetic COs detected by sequencing of hybrid progenies with equal numbers observed in the chromosome sets transmitted by female and male gametes, and fold increases of 2.3 in females and 1.5 in males compared to wild type (Fig. 1D, Supplementary Fig. 3)8. The zyp1 mutation thus leads to an increase in class I COs, which disproportionately affects female meiosis and abolishes heterochiasmy.
Combining HEI10 overexpression and zyp1 massively increases class I COs
HEI10oe and zyp1 increase CO number, but in different ways; while the former maintains heterochiasmy and some interference, the latter does not. We thus combined zyp1 mutation and HEI10oe and analyzed the effects on MLH1 foci numbers (Fig. 1A, B). In Col, the number of foci observed in zyp1 mutants homozygous for the HEI10oe transgene was significantly higher than ever previously reported, reaching 47.8 and 45.0 in females and males, respectively. The female and male MLH1 counts are not significantly different from each other and represent marked 6.7-fold and 3.5-fold increases compared to their respective wild types. In Col zyp1 males heterozygous for HEI10oe, the MLH1 foci count was slightly but significantly lower (41.1, p = 0.015) than the homozygous, showing that there is a dynamic range of HEI10 dosage effects on COs. In the hybrid zyp1 HEI10oe, the observed number of MLH1 in females and males was 29.8 and 30.0, not significantly different from each other (p = 0.8) but representing a 4.4- and 2.9-fold increase compared to their wild type controls. This suggests that class I COs are massively increased in zyp1 mutants overexpressing HEI10. When comparing Col and Col/Ler zyp1 HEI10oe het, the number of MLH1 foci is higher in the pure line (41.1) than in the hybrid (30). The endogenous HEI10 allele may contribute to this difference, but probably has a limited effect in this context of HEI10 over-expression. Alternatively it is possible that the DNA polymorphisms between homologous chromosomes in the hybrid decrease the number of CO-eligible recombination intermediates.
Progeny sequencing showed that the number of genetic COs in male zyp1 HEI10oe was increased compared to wild type, reaching 14.7 CO per chromatid set (3.1-fold, Mann–Whitney test, p < 2.2e−16, Fig. 1D–F), fitting well with the 30 MLH1 foci counted in male meiocytes (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Fig. 11). In females, COs were also increased to even higher levels than predicted by the number of MLH1 foci (30/2 = 15), reaching 19.6 COs per female chromatid set (6.4-fold/wild type, p < 10-15, Fig. 1D–F). Together, this shows that combining zyp1 mutation and HEI10 overexpression increases the numbers of class I COs. The greater number of detected genetic COs compared to what was predicted based on the number of MLH1 foci suggests that class II COs may also be increased in female zyp1 HEI10oe. One plausible scenario is that in absence of ZYP1, over-expression of HEI10 could protect recombination intermediates from anti-CO helicase activity24, which would be then repaired as class II COs by nucleases such as MUS81. While the number of class I CO (MLH1 foci) appear to be identical in both sexes in zyp1 HEI10oe, a component of heterochiasmy is revealed in this context, with now more CO in females than males, presumably due to a large increase of class II CO in female meiosis. The observed increase in class I COs is unprecedented, and suggests that the tripartite SC and HEI10 levels are two main regulators limiting class I COs.
Looking along chromosomes, zyp1 and HEI10oe individually or in combination elicit a massive increase in COs along the arms while the peri-centromeres and the Col/Ler large inversion25,26 remained recalcitrant to recombination (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 4). A higher density of structural polymorphism appears also to locally limit recombination (Supplementary Fig. 4). At the fine scale, the majority of COs were located in genic regions in both wild type and mutants (Supplementary Fig. 5). This suggests that despite a large increase in CO number, the local preference for CO placement is conserved, presumably because the distribution of double-strand breaks is maintained. For all eight hybrid populations, the average observed number of COs is positively correlated with the physical size (Mb) of chromosomes (Pearson’s correlation coefficients >0.8, Fig. 1E). We looked for co-variation of CO frequency between chromosomes within the same meiocyte/gamete, as observed in various species27. No significant correlation was seen in any of the populations, with maximum correlation coefficients of ~0.2 observed in female zyp1 HEI10oe (Supplementary Fig. 6), suggesting that this co-variation does not exist in Arabidopsis or is too small to be detected in our assay.
CO interference is reduced by HEI10 overexpression and abolished in zyp1
To measure the impact of zyp1 and HEI10oe on CO interference, we first analyzed the distribution of distances between two genetically detected COs for chromosomes with exactly two COs in chromatids derived from female and male meiosis (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 7). Note that this approach is to some extend limited as a single chromatid captures only half of the COs occurring on a given bivalent28 (Supplementary Fig. 11). In wild type females and males, the distribution was significantly shifted to large inter-CO distances (p < 10−6) compared with the expected distribution if the COs were randomly spaced, showing the presence of CO interference (Fig. 2C). In HEI10oe females and males, the distribution was also shifted to longer distances, showing the presence of CO interference in both sexes (p < 10−4, Fig. 2D), consistent with previous results18,29. However, the shift was less marked than in the wild type, suggesting a reduction of interference in HEI10oe. In zyp1 and zyp1 HEI10oe, the observed distributions of inter-CO distances were not different from what would be expected in the case of random spacing (p > 0.2, Fig. 2E, F), suggesting an abolition of CO interference in both females and males. Furthermore, we performed a coefficient of coincidence (CoC curve) analysis that accurately describes CO interference3,30 (Fig. 2G–J, Supplementary Fig. 8). In wild type, the two CoC curves are below 1 at distances < ~15 Mb in both females and males, confirming the presence of substantial CO interference (Fig. 2G). The female curve stays close to 0 for longer distances, showing that CO interference propagates to longer Mb distances in females, consistent with previous analyses8,14,16. In HEI10oe, the curves also deviate from 1 at short distances (<~7 Mb), showing the presence of interference, although at a reduced level compared to wild type (Fig. 2H). As in wild type, interference in HEI10oe is stronger in female than in male meiosis. In contrast, the CoC curves are flat at values close to 1 for both females and males in zyp1 (Fig. 2I), confirming that CO interference is abolished in the absence of ZYP17,8. In zyp1 HEI10oe, the curves are also flat at ~1, showing that the numerous class I COs produced in this context do not interfere with each other (Fig. 2J). Thus, HEI10oe reduces, while zyp1 abolishes CO interference.
Only mild meiotic defects are observed in zyp1 HEI10oe
The limited level of COs per chromosome observed in most eukaryotes could suggest that a high level of COs has a detrimental effect. We explored if a massive elevation of class I COs is associated with meiotic chromosome segregation and fertility defects. The number of seeds per fruit is reduced in zyp1-1 compared to wild type (−8%, t-test, p < 0.001), consistent with previous results and the reported loss of the obligate CO in zyp1 mutants7,8 (Fig. 3I). Analyses based on sequence coverage detected a few aneuploids among zyp1 transmitted chromatids (2/497, Fig. 3J and Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10) that were not detected in hybrid wild types (0/427 in this study, and 0/760 in an independent wild type dataset31). The HEI10oe C2 line also showed a slight reduction of fertility (−12%, p = 0.005, Fig. 3I) and low frequency of aneuploid chromatid sets (2/285). In zyp1 HEI10oe, seed number was reduced (−7%, p = 0.025), and a small number of aneuploids were detected in hybrids (7/272), suggesting a slight meiotic defect also in this background. All the 11 identified trisomy cases concerned chromosome 4, the shortest Arabidopsis chromosome. The frequency of aneuploids we observed among progeny is likely an underestimation of the meiotic missegregation, as it was reported that transmission of gametes with an extra chromosome is low in Arabidopsis32. The centromeric region of chromosome 4 of the aneuploids is systematically heterozygous Col/Ler, which is diagnostic for missegregation at meiosis I (failure to separate homologous chromosomes). For the vast majority (9/11), no COs were detected on the aneuploid chromosome, which is compatible with an absence of COs in the bivalent (however, a transmitted chromatid without a CO can result from a bivalent with CO, Supplementary Fig. 11). None of the aneuploids were among the samples with very high CO numbers (up to seven on a single chromosome 4, Supplementary Fig. 3) This favors the hypothesis that these nine events resulted from the loss of the obligate CO and consequent random missegregation of univalents, rather than an alternative hypothesis in which elevated CO number could disturb chromosome segregation. It should be also noted that a translocation is associated with the HEI10 C2 transgene, which may also contribute to chromosome missegregation29. Two aneuploids, both from zyp1 HEI10oe, had two COs on the trisomic chromosome. In both cases, the two COs are relatively close to each other (~2 and 4 Mb), which may lead to an unstable connection between the homologs as spindle tension would be counteracted by only a short stretch of cohesion. Meiotic chromosome spreads in zyp1 HEI10oe showed that most metaphase I cells had a wild type configuration with five bivalents aligned on the metaphase plate (44/45 in Col; 23/30 in Col/Ler; Fig. 3C). However, one univalent was observed in a minority of cells (1/45 and 7/30, Fig. 3E). Consistently, at metaphase II almost all cells had five chromosomes aligned on the two plates (25/25 and 6/7; Fig. 3D), and one had a 6:4 configuration indicating unbalanced segregation at meiosis I (Fig. 3F), likely due to the absence of the obligate CO. Altogether, this shows that a slight meiotic chromosome segregation defect is present in HEI10oe zyp1. However, the rare missegregations appear to be due to an incomplete CO assurance and do not appear to be associated with the extreme CO numbers observed in the mutants (up to 15 COs in a single chromatid, Supplementary Fig. 3). This suggests that high CO number does not impair chromosome segregation and raises the question of the evolutionary forces that limit CO to typically less than three per chromosome per meiosis in most eukaryotes4,33. While failure to ensure at least one CO per chromosome pair is associated with meiotic failure in most eukaryotes, the reasons that prevent high CO numbers are unclear. The absence of an immediate cost of elevated CO numbers in HEI10oe zyp1 suggests that low CO numbers are not selected for by evolution because of mechanical constraints during meiosis. Rather, this observation suggests that the medium-to-long term genetic effects of COs are subject to indirect selection4. This supports the suggestion that a relatively low recombination rate, not much higher than one per chromosome, is optimal for adaptation.
Female and male chromosome axis lengths differ and are affected by neither HEI10oe nor zyp1
SC length has been shown to correlate with the frequency of class I COs13,14,15. We wondered if the class I CO increase provoked by zyp1 and HEI10oe is associated with variation in SC length. We traced chromosome axes (REC8) in female and male meiocytes with preserved 3D organization and measured the length of each chromosome (Fig. 4). In wild type, we found that the SC is 1.6-fold longer in males than females, consistent with previous reports14 (Fig. 4M). The longer total SC length in wild type males is proportional to the higher MLH1 foci and CO numbers compared to females (Figs. 1B, 1D and 4Q), suggesting that SC length determines CO number and thus drives heterochiasmy. SC/axis absolute and relative length is conserved in both sexes in HEI10oe, zyp1, and zyp1 HEI10oe mutants, thus maintaining the male-female dimorphism (Fig. 4M). In HEI10oe, the MLH1 foci and CO numbers are increased proportionally in males and females, maintaining heterochiasmy (Figs. 1B and 4O–Q). This suggests that the effect of HEI10 dosage on COs is constrained by the length of the SC. In clear contrast to HEI10oe, the link between axis length and CO number is disrupted in zyp1, with MLH1 foci and COs equal in males and females despite a large difference in axis length (4O–Q). The observation that the length of pairs of axes in zyp1 matches the length of the assembled SC in the wild type suggests that the length of the two axes directly determines SC length. In the double mutant zyp1 HEI10oe, MLH1 foci are increased and reach equal numbers in males and females despite different axis lengths that are unmodified compared to wild type (Fig. 4P). This suggests that HEI10 dosage has a comparable effect in males and females in the absence of the SC.
Altogether, this suggests that two major factors conjointly regulate CO number: (i) Our results show that the transverse filament of the SC ZYP1 imposes interference and limits COs. The length of the axis/SC is correlated with the number of COs in various contexts13, and when comparing sexes. Crucially, this correlation is lost in the absence of ZYP1, where the difference in axis length is no longer associated with a difference in CO number, suggesting that COs are regulated by the length of the tripartite SC and thus indirectly by the axis. The upstream mechanisms that determine the differences in SC lengths in males and females in many organisms remain to be determined. (ii) HEI10 dosage positively regulated CO formation. The effect of HEI10 dosage appears to be constrained by the length of the SC. HEI10 initially loads as multiple foci along the SC before consolidating into a small number of large foci at CO sites19. This supports a model in which HEI10 loading on the SC depends conjointly on HEI10 expression levels and SC length and that this loading eventually determines CO number.
The HEI10 coarsening model
The results we present here and previous observations can be interpreted in the context of an emerging model for CO patterning via coarsening through the diffusion of HEI10 along the SC17,18. Several models are proposed for CO interference5,30, but the coarsening model has the advantage of directly accounting for the roles of HEI10 and ZYP1. In this model (Fig. 5), HEI10 initially forms multiple foci along the SC, and HEI10 molecules diffuse along the SC between foci. If larger foci tend to retain more HEI10 molecules than smaller foci, a coarsening process is initiated, and large foci grow at the expense of nearby smaller foci, leading to the formation of well-spaced large foci. These large foci are proposed to create a specific context that promotes class I CO formation (e.g., by attracting the MLH1/MLH3 complex) and protects recombination intermediates from anti-CO factors (i.e., FANCM and RECQ424,34). It is unclear if initial foci colocalize with recombination intermediates or if recombination intermediates favor the coarsening process locally, but both hypotheses envisage final foci to embed such an intermediate. This model predicts the obligate CO, a limited number of COs, and interference18. If the coarsening process can proceed without restrictions, it would ultimately lead to the formation of a single focus/CO per bivalent, as observed in C. elegans17. However, in most species, including Arabidopsis, 2–3 interfering class I COs are typically observed per bivalent. At least three hypotheses can account for this observation: one proposes an upper limit in the size of foci, above which it stops growing, allowing other foci to be maintained. The second supposes that the coarsening is stopped when a checkpoint is satisfied (e.g., when at least one large focus/CO is formed per chromosome). The third suggests that the process is stopped before completion after a certain period, which we consider here for simplicity. In all cases, the total amount of HEI10 loaded onto the SC determines the number of CO-promoting foci, although in the third case the length of the SC also plays a minor role independently of the total amount of HEI10. The model proposes that two factors jointly determine the initial HEI10 loading: (i) HEI10 concentration in the nucleoplasm, which determines the amount of HEI10 in initial foci and on the SC per µm of SC, and (ii) the length of the SC, which, for a given expression level of HEI10 would determine linearly the total HEI10 loading. Our numerical implementation of this model (see Methods) explains the measured CO counts quantitatively (Fig. 6A, B), comparable to ref. 18. In particular, it explains the observed correlation between the length of the SC and the number of COs between chromosome pairs within single cells as well as between different cells, as observed here in Arabidopsis, where female meiosis has a shorter SC and fewer COs than male meiosis. Note that this shorter SC in females also implies stronger CO interference when measured genetically (Fig. 6C, F, I, J; compare with Fig. 2). This model also accounts for the fact that CO number depends on HEI10 expression level, as this level determines the amount of HEI10 loaded per µm of SC18. We observed that overexpressing HEI10 increases CO numbers in males and females without eliminating heterochiasmy, as predicted by the difference in SC length and previous modeling18. In addition, CO interference is also reduced, but not abolished by over-expressing HEI10, as expected, as the coarsening process still occurs (Fig. 6E, F, J). We propose that in the absence of SC, in the zyp1 mutant, HEI10 diffusion is no longer constrained to the SC but occurs freely in the nucleoplasm. In this case, foci still form on chromosomes (Fig. 1A, B), but they now exchange HEI10 directly with the nucleoplasm. If this exchange is slow compared to the duration of pachytene, all initial foci grow continuously by taking up HEI10. In contrast, when HEI10 is exchanged more quickly, competition between foci, and thus coarsening, will set in, which was also recently proposed35. In both cases, large HEI10 foci form, colocalize with MLH1, and promote class I COs. However, the obligate CO and CO interference are lost as the diffusion is no longer constrained per chromosome (Fig. 6G, H, K, L). In a sense, in the absence of the SC, the coarsening and CO designation process can be said to be “blind” to chromosomes. The absence of the SC must be associated with slower coarsening since otherwise the exchange of HEI10 via the nucleoplasm would be significant in wild type, too. If the number of initial foci in the zyp1 mutant is roughly comparable to wild type, slower coarsening implies a bigger number of large foci at the end of pachytene, consistent with the increase observed experimentally (Fig. 1). Together with interference, heterochiasmy is abolished when the number of COs per chromosome is solely determined by HEI10 expression level in the nucleoplasm and no longer by HEI10 loading onto the SC. Taken together, the experimental data and the coarsening model show that two factors limit class I COs: ZYP1-mediated CO-interference and HEI10 levels.
A similar model was proposed and further supporting experimental data were recently obtained in C. elegans17,36. Several additional pieces of evidence suggest that the joint control of COs by SC and HEI10 is conserved: In multiple species, HEI10 homologs also initially form multiple foci before eventually consolidating into a limited number of large foci that co-localize with COs19,20,21,22,37; COs covary with SC length in many species13; Variants that affect recombination rates in natural populations of diverse species involve genes that encode HEI10 homologs38. This suggests that the coarsening of HEI10 along the SC may be a conserved process for CO patterning in eukaryotes.
Methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
Arabidopsis thaliana plants were cultivated in Polyklima growth chambers (16-h day, 21.5 °C, 280 µM; 8-h night, 18 °C: 60% humidity). Wild type Col-0 and Ler−1 are 186AV1B4 and 213AV1B1 from the Versailles stock center (http://publiclines.versailles.inra.fr/). The zyp1-1 (8.7.2V1T3) and zyp1-6 (1.12V5T2) mutants were characterized previously8. The HEI10 over-expression line is Col HEI10 line C223, kindly provided by Ian Henderson. Genotyping of the mutants was carried out by PCR amplification (Supplementary Data 2).
To generate the double homozygous mutant zyp1-1−/− HEI10oe in Col, zyp1-1+/− plants were crossed with HEI10oe homozygous mutant plants (C2). The obtained double heterozygous zyp1-1+/− HEI10oe were selfed to produce zyp1-1−/− mutants, HEI10oe homozygous, and zyp1-1−/− HEI10oe double homozygous mutants. These sister plants were used to perform MLH1 foci counting, SC measurements, chromosome spreads, and seed countings. To generate zyp1-1/zyp1-6 HEI10oe het in Col/Ler, double heterozygous zyp1-1+/− HEI10oe (Col) were crossed with zyp1-6+/− (Ler) to generate zyp1-1/zyp1-6 HEI10oe het, HEI10oe het, zyp1-1/zyp1-6 and wild type controls in Col/Ler. These sister plants were used for MLH1 foci counting and SC length measurements and were reciprocally backcrossed with wild type Col to generate the sequencing populations. Backcross populations were grown in the greenhouse for three weeks (16-h day/8-h night) and four days in the dark. For DNA extraction and library preparation, 100–150 mg leaf samples were collected from the four backcross populations39.
Cytology
Immunolocalization on male meiocytes were conducted by modifying a previously described method8,40. Briefly, fresh 0.35–0.45 mm flower buds were dissected to remove sepals and petals and collected in buffer A (KCl 80 mM, NaCl 20 mM, Pipes-NaOH 15 mM, EGTA 0.5 mM, EDTA 2 mM, Sorbitol 80 mM, DTT 1 mM, Spermine 0.15 mM, spermidine 0.5 mM). Buds were fixed in bufferA+2% formaldehyde for 30 min under vacuum, washed in buffer A for 10 minutes, and digested for 40 minutes at 37 °C (0.3% cellulase, 0.3% pectolyase Y23, 0.3% driselase, 0,1% sodium azide in citrate buffer). Following a wash in buffer A, digested buds were kept in buffer A on ice. Next, 10-15 buds were placed in 6 µL of buffer A on a 18 × 18 mm high precision coverslip, in which anthers were dissected and squashed to extrude meiocytes. A 3 µL drop of activated polyacrylamide solution (25 µL 15% polyacrylamide (SIGMA A3574) in buffer A + 1.25 µL of 20% sodium sulfite + 1.25 µL of 20% ammonium persulfate) is added to the meiocytes and a second coverslip is placed on the top, with gentle pressure. The polyacrylamide gels were left to polymerize for 1 h and then the two coverslips were separated. The coverslips covered by a gel pad were incubated in 1X PBS, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA for 1 h with agitation, followed by 2 h incubation in blocking buffer (3% BSA in 1X PBS + 0.1% Tween 20) at room temperature. Coverslips were then incubated with 100 µL of primary antibody in blocking buffer at 4 °C in a humid chamber for 48 h. Coverslips were washed four times 30 min with 1X PBS, 0,1% Triton X-100. One hundred microliters of the appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies in blocking buffer were applied (1:250) and incubated at room temperature for 2 h in the dark. Gels were washed four times 20 min with 1X PBS, 0, 1% Triton X-100. 15 µL of SlowFade™ Gold were used for mounting the coverslip with a slide, that was sealed with nail polish.
For female meiocytes, 0.8–1.2 mm pistils were collected and their stigmata cut off. Pistils were then fixed and digested following the same procedure as for male meiocytes, as described above. The pistils were then opened longitudinally and the ovules released on a slide. The subsequent slide treatment and immunolocalization were the same as for male meiocytes.
Four primary antibodies were used: anti-REC8 raised in rat41 (laboratory code PAK036, dilution 1:250), anti-MLH1 in rabbit42 (PAK017, 1:200), and anti-HEI10 in chicken19 (PAK046, 1:5,000). Secondary antibodies (dilution 1:250) were Abberior STAR ORANGE Goat anti-rat IgG (STORANGE-1007), STAR RED Goat anti-chicken IgY (STRED-1005), STAR GREEN Goat anti-rabbit IgG (STGREEN-1002). Super-resolution images were acquired with the Abberior instrument facility line (https://abberior-instruments.com/) 561- and 640-nm excitation lasers (for STAR Orange and STAR Red, respectively) and a 775-nm STED depletion laser. Confocal images were taken with the same instrument with a 485-nm excitation laser (for STAR GREEN/Alexa488).
Image processing and analysis
Deconvolution of the images was performed by Huygens Essential (version 21.10, Scientific Volume Imaging, https://svi.nl/) using the classic maximum likelihood estimation algorithm with lateral drift stabilization; signal-to-noise ratio: 7 for STED images and 20 for confocal images, 40 iterations, and quality threshold of 0.5. Maximum intensity projections and contrast adjustments were also done with Huygens Essential 22.04.0p0 64b. Deconvoluted pictures were imported into Imaris x64 9.6.0 (https://imaris.oxinst.com/, Oxford Instruments, UK) for subsequent analysis. MLH1 foci were counted using the spots module in diplotene and diakinesis cells. The vast majority of MLH foci colocalize with a HEI10 focus. Only double MLH1/HEI10 foci present on chromosomes were taken into account. For REC8 signal tracing, fully synapsed cells were used to trace the chromosomes. In wild type and HEI10oe, the five synapsed bivalents were traced. In zyp1 and zyp1 HEI10oe, five pairs of parallel chromosomes were traced. The surface module was used to create a clean masked REC8 channel for filament tracing. The filament module was used to trace the SC length, AutoDepth function was used to do semi-automatic tracing and get the simulated chromosome. The SC length of each chromosome was measured using the statistics function of the Filament module. Statistical tests were performed in Prism 9.4.1.
CO identification and analysis
In this study, the female and male population of wild type (48 and 47 plants), HEI10oe (144 and 141 plants), zyp1 (48 and 47 plants) and zyp1 HEI10oe (142 and 138 plants) were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq3000 (2 × 150bp) conducted by the Max Planck-Genome-center (https://mpgc.mpipz.mpg.de/home/). The raw sequencing data of the female and male population of wild type (212 and 120 plants, respectively) and zyp1 (224 and 178 plants) from a previous study (ArrayExpress number E-MTAB-9593)8 were also included in this study. In total, we analyzed 260 and 167 wild type female and male, 144 and 141 HEI10oe female and male, 272 and 225 zyp1 female and male, 142 and 138 zyp1 HEI10oe female and male plants, separately. The raw sequencing data were quality-controlled using FastQC v0.11.9 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The sequencing reads were aligned to the Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 TAIR10 reference genome, which was downloaded from TAIR43,44 (https://www.arabidopsis.org/), using BWA v0.7.15-r114045, with default parameters. A set of Sambamba v0.6.846 commands was used for sorting and removing duplicated mapped reads. Whole-genome alignment between the Col TAIR10 reference genome and the Ler assembly25 (https://1001genomes.org/data/MPIPZ/MPIPZJiao2020/releases/current/strains/Ler/) was performed by nucmer from the MUMmer4 toolbox47, with parameters “–maxmatch -c 100 -b 500 -l 50”, and further filtered by delta-filter, with parameters “-m -i 90 -l 100”. Then, SyRI v1.248 was used to identify structural rearrangements and local variations (SNPs and small indels); the identified syntenic SNPs were used for the generation of a high-confidence SNP marker list, and the detected inversions and translocations (>100 bp) were used for the chromosomal comparison with CO distribution (Supplementary Fig. 5). To call CO we used a set of 620,115 high-confident SNP markers and a sliding window-based method, with a window size of 50 kb and a step size of 25 kb8. Samples with low coverage (<0.1× depth) or a potential contamination (more than 5% of the windows with the Col allele frequency in the range of 0.8–0.9) were filtered out8,31,49,50,51. Samples of each population were randomly selected for checking predicted COs manually by inGAP-family50. To simulate the distribution of CO distances in the absence of CO interference we: (i) For each chromosome, computed the distances between all possible pairs of CO positions observed in the entire population of chromosomes with exactly two COs (e.g., distance from a CO in sample 1 with a CO in sample 2). (ii) To match the relative contribution of each chromosome between the observed dataset and the simulation, we downsized the simulated dataset of individual chromosome by random sampling. We used a total of 1608, 14,208, 23,628, 26,320, 57,000, 41,548, 4704, and 9944 simulated chromosomes for female/male wild type, HEI10oe, zyp1, and zyp1 HEI10oe, respectively. (iii) We calculated the distribution of CO distances as for the observed data. The Coefficient of Coincidence (CoC) was calculated for CO interference analysis using MADpattern30,52, with a number of 13 intervals. Chromosome 4 was excluded from interference analyses because of a translocation associated with the HEI10 transgene29 and potential inversion in our Ler line8. To profile the CO distribution along chromosomes, CO position was defined randomly in the range of CO interval and a sliding window-based strategy was used, with 1 Mb window size and 50 kb step size. Then, the local distribution of recombination (CO resolution ≤1000 bp) was explored by ChIPseeker v1.22.153, with the promoter region defined as 2000 bp upstream of the transcription start site.
Aneuploidy screening by whole–genome sequencing
The sequencing depth of each non-overlapping 100 kb window across the genome was evaluated by Mosdepth v0.2.754 with parameters of “-n–fast-mode–by 10000”. For each sample, pairwise testing of sequencing depths along chromosomes was performed using the Mann–Whitney test, and significant p values were adjusted using the fdr method. A pair of tested chromosomes with fold change >1.2 and p value <1e−20 was considered as aneuploid.
Mathematical model of CO patterning
The mathematical model we use is equivalent to the one presented in ref. 18. To account for diffusion of HEI10 along the SC and the exchange of HEI10 between SC and foci, it describes the concentration \(c\left(x,\;t\right)\) of HEI10 along the SC of length \(L\) together with the amounts \({M}_{i}(t)\) of HEI10 in \(N\) foci that are placed at positions \({x}_{i}\) along the SC for \(i=1,\ldots,\;N\). Here, \(x\) denotes the position along the SC and \(t\) denotes time. Focus \(i\) grows if the local HEI10 concentration on the SC, \(c\left({x}_{i}\right),\) is larger than the equilibrium concentration
implying the growth dynamics
where \(\Lambda\) quantifies the rate of HEI10 exchange. HEI10 diffuses with diffusivity \(D\) along the SC and is exchanged with foci,
We impose no-flux boundary conditions at \(x=0\) and \(x=L\), so the total amount of HEI10 is conserved. We implemented this model using finite differences by discretizing the SC using \(50\) grid points and solved the resulting equations using an explicit Euler scheme55.
We initialize the system with a uniform concentration on the SC, \(c\left(x,\;t=0\right)={c}_{{{\mbox{init}}}}\). The \(N\) foci are positioned uniformly along the SC and their sizes \({M}_{i}\) are chosen independently from a normal distribution with mean \({M}_{{{\mbox{init}}}}\) and standard deviation \(\sigma\), which has been truncated to \([{M}_{{{\mbox{init}}}}-3\sigma,\;{M}_{{{\mbox{init}}}}+3\sigma ]\). The diffusivity D = 1.1 μm2/s, the exchange rate \(\varLambda=2.1\; {\upmu }{{\mbox{m}}}/{{\mbox{s}}}\), the exponent \(\alpha=0.25\), and the base equilibrium concentration \({c}_{0}^{{{\mbox{eq}}}}=1.35\;{{\mbox{a.u.}}}/\upmu {{\mbox{m}}}\), are inspired by ref. 18. We use SC lengths \(L\) measured in wild type (Fig. 4N) and estimate an initial density of four foci per µm, based on cytology8. For simulations, we choose \({M}_{{{\mbox{init}}}}=y\cdot 3.4\;{{\mbox{a.u.,}}}\) \({\sigma }_{{{\mbox{init}}}}=y\cdot 1.1\;{{\mbox{a.u.}}}\), and cinit = y · 1.4 a.u./μm, where \(y\) is a factor to account for higher HEI10 expression levels. We chose \(y=2\) for wild type Col, \(y=6\) for HEI10oe het Col, \(y=8\) for HEI10oe homo Col, \(y=1.5\) for wild type Col/Ler, and \(y=5.5\) for HEI10oe het Col/Ler, which accounts for the reduced activity in Ler56 and HEI10 overexpression. We simulate coarsening on each individual SC for male and female meiosis for \(10{{\mbox{h}}}\), comparable to the duration of pachytene57,58. Only foci above a threshold size of \({M}_{{{\mbox{thresh}}}}=3\;{{\mbox{a.u.}}}\) are assumed to attract MLH1 and form class I COs. The associated COs per chromatid were determine by choosing COs from the bivalent independently with 50% probability. Here, we assume a linear relation between the position of the MLH1 foci on the SC (µm) and the genomic position (Mb) of the COs on the chromatid. Note that we excluded chromosome 4 from the interference analyses, consistent with the analysis of the experimental data described above.
In the case of the zyp1 mutant, the model implies that all CO positions are independent. To obtain a theoretical distribution of COs, we thus first determine the number of COs per chromatid by sampling a Poisson distribution with a mean given by the experimental data (Fig. 4N) and then distribute these COs uniformly along the chromatid length.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The list of identified COs in the female and male populations of wild type, HEI10oe, zyp1, and zyp1 HEI10oe can be accessed in Supplementary Data 1. The raw sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the ArrayExpress EMBL-EBI database under accession code E-MTAB-11696. The reference Col (TAIR10) and Ler genomes used in this study can be found in https://www.arabidopsis.org/ and https://1001genomes.org/data/MPIPZ/MPIPZJiao2020/releases/current/strains/Ler/, respectively. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Sturtevant, A. H. The linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association. J. Exp. Zool. 14, 43–59 (1913).
Sturtevant, A. H. The behavior of the chromosomes as studied through linkage. Z. f.ür. Indukt. Abstamm.- und Vererbungslehre 13, 234–287 (1915).
Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. A few of our favorite things: pairing, the bouquet, crossover interference and evolution of meiosis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 54, 135–148 (2016).
Otto, S. P. & Payseur, B. A. Crossover interference: shedding light on the evolution of recombination. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 19–44 (2019).
von Diezmann, L. & Rog, O. Let’s get physical - mechanisms of crossover interference. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs255745 (2021).
Pyatnitskaya, A., Borde, V. & De Muyt, A. Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis. Chromosoma 128, 181–198 (2019).
France Martin, G. et al. ZYP1 is required for obligate cross-over formation and cross-over interference in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2021671118 (2021).
Capilla-Pérez, L. et al. The synaptonemal complex imposes crossover interference and heterochiasmy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2023613118 (2021).
Libuda, D. E., Uzawa, S., Meyer, B. J. & Villeneuve, A. M. Meiotic chromosome structures constrain and respond to designation of crossover sites. Nature 502, 703–706 (2013).
Gordon, S. G., Kursel, L. E., Xu, K. & Rog, O. Synaptonemal complex dimerization regulates chromosome alignment and crossover patterning in meiosis. PLOS Genet. 17, e1009205 (2021).
Voelkel-Meiman, K., Cheng, S.-Y., Morehouse, S. J. & MacQueen, A. J. Synaptonemal complex proteins of budding yeast define reciprocal roles in MutSγ-mediated crossover formation. Genetics 203, 1091–1103 (2016).
Voelkel-Meiman, K. et al. Crossover recombination and synapsis are linked by adjacent regions within the N terminus of the Zip1 synaptonemal complex protein. PLOS Genet. 15, e1008201 (2019).
Kleckner, N., Storlazzi, A. & Zickler, D. Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. Trends Genet. 19, 623–628 (2003).
Drouaud, J. et al. Sex-specific crossover distributions and variations in interference level along arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4. PLOS Genet. 3, e106 (2007).
Shang, Y. et al. Meiotic chromosome organization and crossover patterns†. Biol. Reprod., 107, 275–288 (2022).
Lloyd, A. & Jenczewski, E. Modelling sex-specific crossover patterning in arabidopsis. Genetics 211, 847–859 (2019).
Zhang, L., Stauffer, W., Zwicker, D., Dernburg, A.F. Crossover patterning through kinase-regulated condensation and coarsening of recombination nodules. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.26.457865v1 (2021).
Morgan, C. et al. Diffusion-mediated HEI10 coarsening can explain meiotic crossover positioning in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 12, 4674 (2021).
Chelysheva, L. et al. The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3. PLoS Genet 8, e1002799 (2012).
Dubois, E. et al. Building bridges to move recombination complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 12400–12409 (2019).
Wang, K. et al. The role of rice HEI10 in the formation of meiotic crossovers. PLOS Genet. 8, e1002809 (2012).
Qiao, H. et al. Antagonistic roles of ubiquitin ligase HEI10 and SUMO ligase RNF212 regulate meiotic recombination. Nat. Genet 46, 194–199 (2014).
Ziolkowski, P. A. et al. Natural variation and dosage of the HEI10 meiotic E3 ligase control Arabidopsis crossover recombination. Genes Dev. 31, 306–317 (2017).
Séguéla-Arnaud, M. et al. Multiple mechanisms limit meiotic crossovers: TOP3α and two BLM homologs antagonize crossovers in parallel to FANCM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4713–4718 (2015).
Jiao, W.-B. & Schneeberger, K. Chromosome-level assemblies of multiple Arabidopsis genomes reveal hotspots of rearrangements with altered evolutionary dynamics. Nat. Commun. 11, 989 (2020).
Zapata, L. et al. Chromosome-level assembly of Arabidopsis thaliana Ler reveals the extent of translocation and inversion polymorphisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, E4052–E4060 (2016).
Wang, S. et al. Per-nucleus crossover covariation and implications for evolution. Cell 177, 326–338 (2019).
Veller, C., Wang, S., Zickler, D., Zhang, L. & Kleckner, N. Limitations of gamete sequencing for crossover analysis. Nature 606, E1–E3 (2022).
Serra, H. et al. Massive crossover elevation via combination of HEI10 and recq4a recq4b during Arabidopsis meiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2437–2442 (2018).
Zhang, L., Liang, Z., Hutchinson, J. & Kleckner, N. Crossover patterning by the beam-film model: analysis and implications. PLOS Genet. 10, e1004042 (2014).
Lian, Q. et al. The megabase-scale crossover landscape is largely independent of sequence divergence. Nat. Commun. 13, 3828 (2022).
Koncz, C., Chua, N. H., Schell, J. S. Methods in arabidopsis research (World Scientific, 1992).
Fernandes, J. B., Séguéla-Arnaud, M., Larchevêque, C., Lloyd, A. H. & Mercier, R. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in hybrid plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 2431–2436 (2018).
Crismani, W. et al. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 336, 1588–1590 (2012).
Fozard, J. A., Morgan, C., Howard, M. The synaptonemal complex controls cis- versus trans-interference in coarsening-based meiotic crossover patterning. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.11.487855v1 (2022).
Haversat, J. et al. Robust designation of meiotic crossover sites by CDK-2 through phosphorylation of the MutSY complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117865119 (2022).
Lake, C. M. et al. a component of the recombination nodule, is required for meiotic double-strand break formation in Drosophila. Elife 4, e08287 (2015).
Stapley, J., Feulner, P. G. D., Johnston, S. E., Santure, A. W., Smadja, C. M. Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 372, 20160455 (2017).
Rowan, B. A., Patel, V., Weigel, D. & Schneeberger, K. Rapid and inexpensive whole-genome genotyping-by-sequencing for crossover localization and fine-scale genetic mapping. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genet. 5, 385–398 (2015).
Cromer, L. et al. Patronus is the elusive plant securin, preventing chromosome separation by antagonizing separase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16018–16027 (2019).
Cromer, L. et al. Centromeric cohesion is protected twice at meiosis, by SHUGOSHINs at anaphase I and by PATRONUS at interkinesis. Curr. Biol. 23, 2090–2099 (2013).
Chelysheva, L. et al. An easy protocol for studying chromatin and recombination protein dynamics during arabidopsis thaliana meiosis: immunodetection of cohesins, histones and MLH1. Cytogenetic Genome Res. 129, 143–153 (2010).
Lamesch, P. et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1202–D1210 (2012).
The Arabidopsis Genome I. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815 (2000).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Tarasov, A., Vilella, A. J., Cuppen, E., Nijman, I. J. & Prins, P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics 31, 2032–2034 (2015).
Marcais, G. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005944 (2018).
Goel, M., Sun, H., Jiao, W. B. & Schneeberger, K. SyRI: finding genomic rearrangements and local sequence differences from whole-genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 20, 277 (2019).
Qi, J., Chen, Y., Copenhaver Gregory, P. & Ma, H. Detection of genomic variations and DNA polymorphisms and impact on analysis of meiotic recombination and genetic mapping. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 10007–10012 (2014).
Lian, Q., Chen, Y., Chang, F., Fu, Y., Qi, J. inGAP-family: accurate detection of meiotic recombination loci and causal mutations by filtering out artificial variants due to genome complexities. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics S1672–0229, 00024–3 (2021).
Wang, H. et al. The cohesin loader SCC2 contains a PHD finger that is required for meiosis in land plants. PLOS Genet. 16, e1008849 (2020).
White, M. A., Wang, S., Zhang, L., Kleckner, N. Quantitative modeling and automated analysis of meiotic recombination. In: Meiosis (ed Stuart, D.T.) (Springer New York, 2017).
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G. & He, Q.-Y. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31, 2382–2383 (2015).
Pedersen, B. S. & Quinlan, A. R. Mosdepth: quick coverage calculation for genomes and exomes. Bioinformatics 34, 867–868 (2018).
Zwicker, D. py-pde: a Python package for solving partial differential equations. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 2158 (2020).
Ziolkowski, P. A. et al. Natural variation and dosage of the HEI10 meiotic E3 ligase control Arabidopsis crossover recombination. Genes & Development 31, 306–317 (2017).
Armstrong, S. J., Franklin, F. C. H. & Jones, G. H. A meiotic time-course for Arabidopsis thaliana. Sex. Plant Reprod. 16, 141–149 (2003).
Prusicki, M. A. et al. Live cell imaging of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. eLife 8, e42834 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by core funding from the Max Planck Society to R.M., M.E., as well as D.Z. and Alexander von Humboldt Fellowships to Q.L. and J.J. The IJPB benefits from the support of Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS (ANR-17-EUR-0007). We thank Abby Dernburg for enlightening discussions. We thank Ian Henderson for kindly providing the C2 line. We thank Neysan Donnelly for proofreading the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.D. produced and analyzed the MLH1-HEI10 cytological data, developed the protocol for female immunolocalization, produced all the genetic material, and analyzed fertility. Q.L. analyzed the sequencing data and performed recombination, interference, and aneuploidy analyses. J.J. generated SC images, and analyzed chromosome missegregation and SC length data. M.E. and D.Z. developed and analyzed the mathematical model of CO patterning. M.G. developed the method for chromosome 3D analyses. R.M. lead the project and wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks James Higgins and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Durand, S., Lian, Q., Jing, J. et al. Joint control of meiotic crossover patterning by the synaptonemal complex and HEI10 dosage. Nat Commun 13, 5999 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33472-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33472-w
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The RING Domain of Rice HEI10 is Essential for Male, But Not Female Fertility
Rice (2024)
-
Enhanced recombination empowers the detection and mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci
Communications Biology (2024)
-
Control of meiotic crossover interference by a proteolytic chaperone network
Nature Plants (2024)
-
The effect of DNA polymorphisms and natural variation on crossover hotspot activity in Arabidopsis hybrids
Nature Communications (2023)
-
SCEP1 and SCEP2 are two new components of the synaptonemal complex central element
Nature Plants (2023)