Abstract
Topological crystalline insulators (TCIs) can host anomalous surface states which inherits the characteristics of crystalline symmetry that protects the bulk topology. Especially, the diversity of magnetic crystalline symmetries indicates the potential for novel magnetic TCIs with distinct surface characteristics. Here, we propose a topological magnetic Dirac insulator (TMDI), whose two-dimensional surface hosts fourfold-degenerate Dirac fermions protected by either the \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\) or \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) magnetic wallpaper group. The bulk topology of TMDIs is protected by diagonal mirror symmetries, which give chiral dispersion of surface Dirac fermions and mirror-protected hinge modes. We propose candidate materials for TMDIs including Nd4Te8Cl4O20 and DyB4 based on first-principles calculations, and construct a general scheme for searching TMDIs using the space group of paramagnetic parent states. Our theoretical discovery of TMDIs will facilitate future research on magnetic TCIs and illustrate a distinct way to achieve anomalous surface states in magnetic crystals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The surface states of topological insulators (TIs) have anomalous characteristics that are unachievable in ordinary periodic systems1. A representative example is the twofold-degenerate gapless fermion on the surface of three-dimensional (3D) TIs protected by time-reversal symmetry (TRS)2,3,4,5. Contrary to the case of ordinary two-dimensional (2D) crystals with TRS in which gapless fermions appear in pairs, a single gapless fermion can exist on the surface of TIs through its coupling to the bulk bands. Such a violation of fermion number doubling6,7,8 is a representative way in which the anomalous characteristics of surface states are manifested at the boundary of TIs.
In topological crystalline insulators (TCIs)9,10, crystalline symmetries enrich the ways in which anomalous surface states are realized. For example, in systems with rotation symmetry and TRS, variants of the fermion doubling theorem enabled by symmetries can be anomalously violated on the surface of TCIs11. Additionally, in the case of mirror-protected TCIs12, although the number of surface gapless fermions can be even, the surface band structure exhibits a chiral dispersion along mirror-invariant lines such that anomalous chiral fermions appear in the one-dimensional (1D) mirror-resolved subspace of the 2D surface Brillouin zone (BZ). More recently, studies showed that in crystals with glide mirrors, the anomalous surface states can have an hourglass-type band connection13. Moreover, when the surface preserves two orthogonal glide mirrors, a single fourfold-degenerate Dirac fermion14 was shown to be achievable as an anomalous surface state15.
In magnetic crystals, there is great potential to achieve a new type of magnetic TCI with distinct anomalous surface states16,17,18,19,20,21,22 because there are abundant magnetic crystalline symmetries described by 63 magnetic wallpaper groups (MWGs) and 1421 magnetic space groups (MSGs)23,24, which are overwhelmingly larger than the 17 wallpaper groups and 230 space groups of nonmagnetic crystals25,26,27,28,29. Very recently, exhaustive studies of magnetic topological phases and their classification have been performed16,17,18, and various novel magnetic topological phases have been systematically categorized. However, as far as we can tell, all the surface states of magnetic TCIs reported up to now appear in the form of twofold-degenerate gapless fermions, whose detailed band connection depends on the surface symmetry.
Here, we propose a magnetic TCI with fourfold-degenerate gapless fermions on the surface, coined the topological magnetic Dirac insulator (TMDI). A fourfold-degenerate gapless fermion, a Dirac fermion for short hereafter, can appear on the surface of a magnetic insulator when the MWG of the surface is one of the three MWGs \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\), \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\), and \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\), among 63 possible MWGs. Contrary to the surface Dirac fermion in nonmagnetic crystals protected by two orthogonal glides, our surface Dirac fermion is protected by symmorphic symmetries combined with either an antiunitary translation symmetry or an antiunitary glide mirror.
In particular, in magnetic crystals whose (001)-surface MWG is either \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) or \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\), the bulk topology is characterized by the mirror Chern number (MCN) \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) about the diagonal mirror planes normal to either the [110] or \([1\bar{1}0]\) direction. Because of this, in TMDIs, the way in which the surface anomaly is realized is different from the case of the nonmagnetic Dirac insulator15 and more similar to the case of mirror-protected nonmagnetic TCIs12. Namely, along the mirror-invariant line on the surface BZ, the Dirac fermion develops a chiral dispersion relevant to the MCN. Moreover, the MCN of TMDIs also induces hinge modes at open boundaries along the x and y directions, which respect diagonal mirrors.
Using first-principles calculations, we propose candidate materials for TMDIs, including Nd4Te8Cl4O20 and DyB4. Since the database for magnetic materials only has a limited number of materials, we construct a systematic way to find candidate magnetic materials for TMDIs using the space group of paramagnetic parent compounds.
Results
Dirac fermions and magnetic wallpaper groups
In 2D magnetic crystals, Dirac fermions with fourfold-degeneracy can be symmetry-protected at the BZ corner, M = (π, π), by three MWGs, i.e., Type-III MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) and Type-IV MWGs \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\) and \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\) [see Fig. 1a–c]. Here, we use the notation of Belov and Tarkhova (BT)23 for denoting MWGs and the notation of Belov, Neronova, and Smirnova (BNS)30 for denoting MSGs. Note that Type-III MWGs have antiunitary spatial symmetries combining TRS T with spatial symmetries, while Type-IV MWGs have antiunitary translation symmetries combining T and fractional lattice translations. All three MWGs have mirror-invariant lines, whose normal directions are \(\hat{x}\), \(\hat{y}\), or \(\hat{x}\pm \hat{y}\).
In 2D systems belonging to the Type-III MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) described in Fig. 1c, a Dirac fermion is protected at M by twofold rotation about the z-axis C2z, antiunitary glide mirror \(T{G}_{y}\equiv T\{{m}_{y}| \frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\}\), and off-centered diagonal mirror \({\widetilde{M}}_{x\overline{y}}=\{{m}_{x\overline{y}}| \frac{1}{2},{{{\rm{-}}}}\frac{1}{2}\}\). Here, the notation {g∣t} denotes the point group symmetry g followed by a partial lattice translation t. \({m}_{x\overline{y},y}\) are mirror symmetries that act on real-space coordinates as \({m}_{x\overline{y}}:(x,y,z)\to (y,x,z)\) and my: (x, y, z) → (x, − y, z). [See the conventions in Supplementary Note (SN) 1.] As detailed in SN 3, the fourfold degeneracy is formed by four states ψ±, TGyψ±, \({\widetilde{M}}_{x\overline{y}}{\psi }_{\pm }\), and \(T{G}_{y}{\widetilde{M}}_{x\overline{y}}{\psi }_{\pm }\), where ψ± is an energy eigenstate with C2z eigenvalue ±i.
In contrast, 2D systems belonging to the Type-IV MWGs \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\) and \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\), described in Fig. 1a, b, respectively, have common symmetry elements, i.e., antiunitary translation \({T}_{G}=\{T| \frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\}\) and two mirrors Mx = {mx∣0} and My = {my∣0}, where mx: (x, y, z) → ( − x, y, z). At M, these symmetry elements anticommute with each other, and \({T}_{G}^{2}=-1\). These relations protect the fourfold degeneracy formed by ψ±, TGψ±, Myψ±, and TGMyψ±, where ψ± has Mx eigenvalue ± i (see SN3). Note that the same symmetry representation was also studied in ref. 31.
A typical band structure supported by MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) is shown in Fig. 1d. Since MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) has diagonal mirror \({\widetilde{M}}_{x\overline{y}}\), the energy bands can be divided into two different mirror eigensectors along the \(\Gamma M{\Gamma }^{{\prime} }\) direction. Here, Γ = (0, 0), and \({\Gamma }^{{\prime} }=(2\pi ,2\pi )\). Focusing on the band structures in each mirror sector, we find that the numbers of upward (chiral) and downward (antichiral) bands crossing the Fermi level [E = 0 in Fig. 1d] at M are the same. Otherwise, the mirror-resolved band structure cannot be periodic along \(\Gamma M{\Gamma }^{{\prime} }\). Hence, a Dirac fermion in 2D crystals belonging to MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) is nonchiral in each mirror sector. Similar phenomena also occur in MWGs \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\) and \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\). In general, the mirror-resolved dispersion of Dirac fermion in 2D crystals protected by MWGs is nonchiral. Although the local dispersion near the Dirac point may exhibit either chiral or nonchiral dispersion, the full band dispersion along the mirror invariant line is always nonchiral in 2D crystals.
Chiral surface Dirac fermions
A 2D Dirac fermion, which is nonchiral in 2D systems, can be chiral on the surface of 3D magnetic TCIs, as illustrated in Fig. 1e. Here, we systematically search for 3D magnetic insulators that can host a Dirac fermion on the (001) surface. As a 2D fourfold-degenerate Dirac fermion can be protected by one of the three MWGs \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\), \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\), and \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\), we focus on the MSGs whose (001) surface has one of these three MWGs. By studying the MSG symbols and the detailed surface symmetries, we find that there are at least 31 MSGs that can be generated from such MWGs and additional generators compatible with the MWGs. (See Supplementary Table 1.)
All 31 MSGs have mirror planes whose normal vectors are orthogonal to the (001) direction. Thus, the corresponding MCNs can give chiral dispersions along the mirror-invariant lines on the (001) surface. First, MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) has off-centered diagonal mirrors32\({\widetilde{M}}_{x\overline{y}}=\{{m}_{x\overline{y}}| \frac{1}{2},{{{\rm{-}}}}\frac{1}{2}\}\) and \({\widetilde{M}}_{xy}=\{{m}_{xy}| \frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\}\) [see Fig. 1c]. For the 11 MSGs relevant to MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\), we define four MCNs \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{\pm }^{{k}_{x} = {k}_{y}}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{\pm }^{{k}_{x} = -{k}_{y}}\), which are defined in the kx = ky and kx = − ky planes, respectively. Here, the ± sign denotes the mirror eigenvalues of occupied bands. All the MCNs are equivalent up to sign because of the symmetry relations among \({\widetilde{M}}_{x\overline{y}}\), \({\widetilde{M}}_{xy}\), and TC4z. Hence, the bulk topology can be classified by \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\equiv {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{+}^{{k}_{x} = {k}_{y}}=-{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{-}^{{k}_{x} = {k}_{y}}\). Similarly, we can define MCNs for the 5 MSGs related to MWG \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\), which have four mirrors, Mx, My, \({M}_{x\overline{y}}\), and Mxy. Among them, only two MCNs, \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y}\equiv {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{+}^{{k}_{y} = 0}=-{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{-}^{{k}_{y} = 0}\), are independent, and serve as bulk topological invariants. Finally, for the 15 MSGs related to MWG \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\), the relevant MCNs are \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x}\equiv {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{+}^{{k}_{x} = 0}=-{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{-}^{{k}_{x} = 0}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y}\equiv {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{+}^{{k}_{y} = 0}=-{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{-}^{{k}_{y} = 0}\). For more detailed discussions on the MCNs, see SN4.
Now, we classify the Wilson loop spectra33,34,35,36,37 according to the MCNs. We consider the kz-directed Wilson loop \({{{{\mathcal{W}}}}}_{z}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{\perp })\),
where \({P}_{{{{\rm{occ}}}}}({{{\bf{k}}}})\equiv \mathop{\sum }\nolimits_{n = 1}^{{n}_{{{{\rm{occ}}}}}}\left\vert {u}_{n}({{{\bf{k}}}})\right\rangle \left\langle {u}_{n}({{{\bf{k}}}})\right\vert\) is a projection operator for occupied bands \(\left\vert {u}_{n}({{{\bf{k}}}})\right\rangle\) and k⊥ = (kx, ky). Since the Wilson loop is unitary, its eigenvalue can be collectively denoted as \(\{{e}^{i\theta ({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{\perp })}\}=\{{e}^{i{\theta }_{a}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{\perp })}| {\theta }_{a}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{\perp })\in (-\pi ,\pi ],a=1,\ldots ,{n}_{{{{\rm{occ}}}}}\}\). Then, {θ(k⊥)} defines the Wilson loop spectrum, or equivalently, the Wilson bands. Wilson loop spectra and surface band structures have the same spectral features35,38. Thus, the band structure on the (001) surface can be systematically classified based on Wilson loop analysis. (The details on tight-binding notation and Wilson loop is provided in SN2 and SN5.)
First, let us consider the MSGs related to MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) [see Fig. 2a–e]. At \(\overline{M}=(\pi ,\pi )\), four Wilson bands form a fourfold degeneracy, which can be identified as a Dirac fermion on the (001) surface. The connectivity of Wilson bands is classified by the MCN \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\), which is encoded in the slope of Wilson bands in each mirror-sector crossing a horizontal reference line [a green dashed line in Fig. 2b] along the \(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{M}\) direction. In Fig. 2d, for example, as two Wilson bands with mirror eigenvalue − i intersect the reference line with a negative slope, we obtain \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=2\). See SN5 for the details on the counting rules for \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\).
Now, we compare the Wilson loop spectra of topological phases with nonzero \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) and the trivial phase with zero \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) by focusing on the region near the fourfold degeneracy at \(\overline{M}\). Along the \(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{M}\)-\(\overline{{\Gamma }^{{\prime} }}\) line, the four bands are divided into two different mirror sectors. When \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=0\), as in Fig. 2b, the dispersion in each mirror sector is nonchiral, similar to that of Dirac fermions in 2D crystals in Fig. 1d. In Fig. 2b, chiral and antichiral modes in the same mirror sector (e.g., the +i sector) cross the green dashed reference line with opposite signs of the group velocity. In contrast, their numbers are not equal in Fig. 2d, where \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=2\).
The Dirac fermions in Fig. 2c, e, which correspond to \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=1\) and 4, respectively, appear with additional surface states (black arrows). When \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=1\), the dispersion is chiral along the entire \(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{M}\)-\(\overline{{\Gamma }^{{\prime} }}\) line but locally looks nonchiral near the Dirac point. However, if the dispersion along \(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{M}\)-\(\overline{{\Gamma }^{{\prime} }}\) is deformed such that the additional surface states near \(\overline{\Gamma }\) are pushed away from the Fermi level (which corresponds to θ = 0 in Wilson loop spectra), the Dirac fermion in Fig. 2c becomes chiral, as in Fig. 2h. In contrast, such a deformation is impossible in Fig. 2e, where \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=4\). In general, one can show that a nonzero MCN \(| {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}| \le 2\) manifests as a chiral dispersion of the surface Dirac fermion along \(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{M}\)-\(\overline{{\Gamma }^{{\prime} }}\), provided that there is no additional surface state other than the Dirac fermion at the Fermi level. In contrast, when \(| {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}| \,>\, 2\), additional surface states always appear along \(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{M}\)-\(\overline{{\Gamma }^{{\prime} }}\). Hence, the chiral dispersion of the Dirac fermion when \(| {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}| \le 2\) and the coexistence of additional surface states when \(| {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}| \,>\, 2\) are signatures of the nontrivial bulk topology of 3D TMDIs with nonzero \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\). An exact formulation of the relation among the chiral dispersion of the Dirac fermion, MCN \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\), and number of additional surface states is given in SN6.
Similarly, one can analyze the Wilson loop spectra of the MSGs related to MWG \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\) [see Fig. 2f–j]. The MCN \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) (\({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y}\)) can be determined by examining the \({M}_{x\overline{y}}\) (My) eigenvalues and the slopes of Wilson bands crossing a reference line along \(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{M}\) (\(\overline{\Gamma }\)-\(\overline{X}\)). The relation between \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) and the chiral dispersion of the Dirac fermion is identical to the case of the MSGs with MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\). The only additional feature is that \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y}\) must be equivalent up to modulo 2, i.e., \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}={{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y}\) (mod 2), in insulating phases.
Finally, in the 15 MSGs related to MWG \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\), the Wilson loop spectra can be classified by the MCNs on the kx,y = 0 planes, \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x}(0)\) and \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y}(0)\), related to Mx,y mirrors. The MCNs on the kx,y = π planes, \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x}(\pi )\) and \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y}(\pi )\), are always trivial, while surface Dirac fermions can be chiral only for nonzero \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x,y}(\pi )\). Thus, the surface Dirac fermion in the MSGs with MWG \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }mm\) is nonchiral and trivial.
Topological magnetic Dirac insulators
According to the Wilson loop analysis, the bulk band topology of the 11 MSGs with Type-III MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) and the 5 MSGs with Type-IV MWG \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\) can be characterized by \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) and \(({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}},{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y})\), respectively. In these 16 MSGs, when \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\,\ne\, 0\), a Dirac fermion whose mirror-resolved dispersion is chiral can appear on the (001) surface. Based on this, we define TMDIs as 3D magnetic TCIs with nonzero \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) hosting a 2D chiral Dirac fermion on the (001) surface. Additionally, according to the (001)-surface MWG, TMDIs can be divided into Type-III and Type-IV TMDIs such that Type-III (Type-IV) TMDIs have (001)-surface MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) (\({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\)).
Interestingly, TMDIs also exhibit higher-order topology11,29,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46 with hinge modes at open boundaries along the x and y directions when the entire finite-size systems respect the diagonal mirror symmetries. The MCN for the diagonal mirror \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) follows the higher-order bulk-boundary correspondence41,42,45. The dispersion of hinge modes can be both chiral and helical depending on the details of the systems. Note that the number of chiral and antichiral hinge modes at each hinge can be changed by a mirror-symmetric and bulk-gap-preserving perturbation because such a perturbation can close and reopen a surface gap42,44,47. However, the MCN \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) protects at least \(| {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}|\) hinge modes at each mirror-invariant hinge. (See SN7 for more details.) We provide a tight-binding model for a Type-III TMDI in SN10, which confirms the bulk-boundary correspondence described above.
Candidate materials
Using first-principles calculations, we propose DyB4 and Nd4Te8Cl4O20 as candidate materials for a Type-III TMDI and a Type-IV TMDI, respectively, whose electronic and topological properties are summarized in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively. Although their band structure are metallic, as the systems have nonzero direct gap at all momenta, their mirror Chern numbers are well defined. We note that the two candidate materials, DyB4 and Nd4Te8Cl4O20, are not available in the existing material databases20,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55. In general, searching for candidate magnetic materials is more challenging than searching for nonmagnetic materials because the number of available materials in magnetic material databases20,54 is limited to approximately 160054, which is much smaller than the number of nonmagnetic materials. To overcome this limitation, we will also propose a general scheme to systematically search for candidate materials for TMDIs, whose magnetic structures and MSGs are derived from their parent paramagnetic states.
Let us first consider DyB4, a member of the rare-earth tetraborides family, whose crystal structure is shown in Fig. 3a. The paramagnetic parent phase of DyB4 has space group 127 P4/mbm. In experiments56, this material was reported to have two competing spin configurations that correspond to the Γ2 (with MSG 127.395 \(P4/{m}^{{\prime} }{b}^{{\prime} }{m}^{{\prime} }\)) and Γ4 (with MSG 127.392 \(P{4}^{{\prime} }/{m}^{{\prime} }{b}^{{\prime} }m\)) magnetic states, as shown in Fig. 3b, c. Between them, the Γ2 state was reported to be more favored56. Note that the Γ4 phase can support a Type-III TMDI with (001)-surface MWG \(P{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\). Here, we investigate the conditions in which the Γ4 state becomes the magnetic ground state in DyB4 based on DFT+U(where U is the onsite Coulomb interaction) calculations. We examine the total energies of the Γ2 and Γ4 states as a function of U with fixed Hund’s coupling J = 1 eV. As shown in Fig. 3d, DyB4 undergoes a magnetic phase transition from the Γ4 to Γ2 state when U > 6.5 eV.
An indirect gap near the Fermi level EF=0.0 eV exists in the DFT+ U result (U = 6.5 eV, J=1.0 eV), as shown in Fig. 3e. Because the gap along the Γ-Z line is tiny, as shown in Fig. 3f, a topological phase transition between phases with different MCNs \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) can be easily induced by a small perturbation. (See SN9 for the band structures between U=6.0 eV and 6.5 eV and SN12 for a detailed analysis of this topological phase transition.) Fig. 3g, h show the kz-directed Wilson loop spectra for U = 6.5 eV and 6.0 eV, respectively. Because of gap closing and reopening at Z, a topological phase transition from the \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=-1\) state to the \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=-2\) state occurs as U increases from 6.0 eV to 6.5 eV. Hence, we identify DyB4 at U = 6.5 eV (6.0 eV) as a Type-III TMDI with \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=-2\) ( − 1).
More specifically, let us consider DyB4 at U = 6.5 eV. Figure 3i–j show the surface Green’s function calculations for the top (B-terminated) and bottom (Dy-terminated) surfaces. A surface Dirac fermion with fourfold degeneracy is clearly identified near E = − 0.35 eV on the bottom surface [Fig. 3j, l]. In contrast, the top surface state is buried in the bulk conduction band and thus not visible in the gap. However, the hidden surface state can be brought into the gap by applying a surface potential Esurf = − 0.2 eV, as shown in Fig. 3k.
The second material Nd4Te8Cl4O20 is a candidate for a Type-IV TMDI with \(({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}},{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{y})=(-1,1)\). Since its magnetic properties are unknown, this material is found by using our general scheme to search for candidate materials, as briefly explained below. MSG 129.421 PC4/nmm (123.16.1014 \({P}_{P}4/{m}^{{\prime} }mm\) in the OG setting) is one of the MSGs that can host Type-IV TMDIs, which is derived from nonmagnetic space group (SG) 123 P4/mmm. The crystal structure of NdTe2ClO557 in the paramagnetic phase has SG 123 P4/mmm, as shown in Fig. 4a. Introducing a 2 × 2 × 1 supercell, Nd atoms can form a spin configuration compatible with MSG 129.421 PC4/nmm, as shown in Fig. 4b, c. Assuming the magnetic ordering corresponding to MSG 129.421 PC4/nmm, we study the electronic and topological properties of Nd4Te8Cl4O20. The bulk band structure in Fig. 4d shows a semimetallic state with an indirect gap between − 0.5 eV and 0.0 eV. For the bands below this gap, we compute the kz-directed Wilson loop spectrum, which exhibits a nonzero MCN, \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=-1\), as shown in Fig. 4g. Hence, we identify Nd4Te8Cl4O20 as a candidate for a Type-IV TMDI with (001)-surface MWG \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\).
The surface Green’s function calculations for the top (O-terminated) and bottom (Nd-terminated) surfaces are shown in Fig. 4e, f. Within a gap with a magnitude of 1.5 eV at \(\overline{M}\), a surface Dirac fermion with fourfold degeneracy is clearly identified near E = 1 eV on the top surface. As shown in Fig. 4h, the four states of the surface Dirac fermion are split into two nondegenerate bands and accidentally nearly degenerate bands, in a similar way as in Fig. 2h. Although bottom surface states buried in bulk states are not visible in the gap [Fig. 4f], the hidden surface state can be pushed into the gap by applying a surface potential of − 0.544 eV, as shown in Fig. 4i.
Our material search scheme used to find Nd4Te8Cl4O20 can generally be applied to all 16 MSGs (11 Type-III and 5 Type-IV MSGs) that can host TMDIs, as follows. For each MSG, (i) determine the SG of paramagnetic phases, (ii) obtain the transformation matrix of basis vectors between the magnetic unit cell and crystal unit cell, and (iii) build up the magnetic unit cell from the paramagnetic unit cell according to the transformation matrix as well as restrict the spin configuration of magnetic atoms. (See SN8 for details.) Additionally, using this material search scheme, we studied other candidate materials including two TMDI candidates with nonzero \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) (Ce2Pd2Pb, Ce2Ge2Mg) and four materials with \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}=0\) (HoB4, FeSe, FeTe, AlGeMn, N3TaTh). (See SN9 for details.)
Discussion
Let us discuss the symmetry-breaking effect on the 2D Dirac fermion, either in 2D bulk crystals or on the surface of 3D TMDIs. When a perturbation that preserves diagonal mirrors in MWGs \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) and \({p}_{c}^{{\prime} }4mm\) is applied, the Dirac fermion in 2D crystals becomes gapped while that on the surface of 3D TMDIs remains gapless because of the nonzero MCN. In contrast, a mirror-breaking perturbation can induce various phase transitions in both cases because a 2D Dirac fermion corresponds to a multicritical point in magnetic systems31. For example, MWG \(p{4}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }m\) is reduced to \(p2{g}^{{\prime} }{g}^{{\prime} }\) when \({\widetilde{M}}_{x\overline{y}}\) and TC4z are broken by tensile strain (see SN13). In this case, a mass term is allowed; thus, the Dirac fermion can be gapped. The Chern number of the resulting gapped phase changes by 2 when the sign of the mass is reversed. This, in turn, indicates the appearance of chiral edge channels at domain walls between two gapped domains with opposite signs of the mass.
Finally, we discuss the bulk topological responses of TMDIs. Since mirror symmetry reverses the spatial orientation, it quantizes the axion angle θ to 0 or π, which is related to the MCN by \(\theta /\pi ={{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) (mod 2)18,58. Hence, TMDIs with odd \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) correspond to an axion insulator exhibiting quantized magnetoelectric effects59. In contrast, TMDIs with an even \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\) have a vanishing axion angle. However, according to a recent theoretical proposal60, even helical higher-order topological insulators (HOTIs) with θ = 0 can exhibit spin-resolved magnetoelectric effects. In the case of 3D TMDIs, spin-resolved bands are ill-defined because of noncollinear magnetic orderings inherent in Type-III and Type-IV MSGs. However, by combining the spin and sublattice degrees of freedom, the pseudospin-resolved magnetoelectric effect can be defined in 3D TMDIs with an even \({{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{m}^{x\overline{y}}\), which is demonstrated using a tight-binding model in SN11. A more systematic study of bulk topological responses in magnetic TCIs with noncollinear magnetic ordering is an important subject for future research.
Methods
For the ab initio calculation, the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) is employed with the projector augmented-wave method (PAW)61. We employ the generalized gradient approximation (PBE-GGA) for exchange-correlation potential62. The default VASP potentials, an energy cutoff with 400 eV, and a 8 × 8 × 14 Monkhorst-pack k-point mesh are used. The spin–orbit coupling is considered because of the presence of the heavy rare-earth atoms in the unit cell. On-site Coulomb interaction is taken into account with U = 6.5 eV and J (Hund’s coupling) = 1 eV in DyB4 and U = 6 eV and J = 0 eV in NdTe2ClO5. Wannier Hamiltonians were constructed by WANNIER9063 and symmetrized by WannSymm code64. The WannierTools package65 was used to produce the slab band structure and Wilson loop spectra based on the symmetrized Hamiltonian. The experimental crystal structure of DyB456 are used without structural relaxation. Details on the ab-initio calculation can be found in SN S9.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The numerical codes used in this paper are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).
Bernevig, B. A., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells. Science 314, 1757–1761 (2006).
Fu, L., Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).
Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007).
Hsieh, D. et al. A topological Dirac insulator in a quantum spin Hall phase. Nature 452, 970–974 (2008).
Nielsen, H. B. & Ninomiya, M. A no-go theorem for regularizing chiral fermions. Phys. Lett. B 105, 219–223 (1981).
Haldane, F. D. M. Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly". Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
Ahn, J., Park, S. & Yang, B.-J. Failure of Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem and fragile topology in two-dimensional systems with space-time inversion symmetry: application to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021013 (2019).
Fu, L. Topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011).
Chiu, C.-K., Teo, J. C. Y., Schnyder, A. P. & Ryu, S. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
Fang, C. & Fu, L. New classes of topological crystalline insulators having surface rotation anomaly. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat2374 (2019).
Hsieh, T. H. et al. Topological crystalline insulators in the SnTe material class. Nat. Commun. 3, 982 (2012).
Wang, Z., Alexandradinata, A., Cava, R. J. & Bernevig, B. A. Hourglass fermions. Nature 532, 189–194 (2016).
Young, S. M. & Kane, C. L. Dirac semimetals in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126803 (2015).
Wieder, B. J. et al. Wallpaper fermions and the nonsymmorphic Dirac insulator. Science 361, 246–251 (2018).
Watanabe, H., Po, H. C. & Vishwanath, A. Structure and topology of band structures in the 1651 magnetic space groups. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat8685 (2018).
Elcoro, L. et al. Magnetic topological quantum chemistry. Nat. Commun. 12, 5965 (2021).
Peng, B., Jiang, Y., Fang, Z., Weng, H. & Fang, C. Topological classification and diagnosis in magnetically ordered electronic materials. Phys. Rev. B 105, 235138 (2022).
Okuma, N., Sato, M. & Shiozaki, K. Topological classification under nonmagnetic and magnetic point group symmetry: application of real-space Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence to higher-order topology. Phys. Rev. B 99, 085127 (2019).
Xu, Y. et al. High-throughput calculations of magnetic topological materials. Nature 586, 702–707 (2020).
Bouhon, A., Lange, G. F. & Slager, R.-J. Topological correspondence between magnetic space group representations and subdimensions. Phys. Rev. B 103, 245127 (2021).
Shiozaki, K. The classification of surface states of topological insulators and superconductors with magnetic point group symmetry. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 04A104 (2022).
Belov, N. V. & Tarkhova, T. N. Color symmetry groups. Kristallografiya 1, 4–13 (1956).
Litvin, D. B. Magnetic group tables. IUCr https://doi.org/10.1107/9780955360220001 (2013).
Bradlyn, B. et al. Topological quantum chemistry. Nature 547, 298–305 (2017).
Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Watanabe, H. Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups. Nat. Commun. 8, 50 (2017).
Kruthoff, J., de Boer, J., van Wezel, J., Kane, C. L. & Slager, R.-J. Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band structure combinatorics. Phys. Rev. X 7, 041069 (2017).
Song, Z., Zhang, T., Fang, Z. & Fang, C. Quantitative mappings between symmetry and topology in solids. Nat. Commun. 9, 3530 (2018).
Khalaf, E., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Watanabe, H. Symmetry indicators and anomalous surface states of topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031070 (2018).
Belov, N. V., Neronova, N. N. & Smirnova, T. S. Shubnikov groups. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 2, 311–322 (1957).
Young, S. M. & Wieder, B. J. Filling-enforced magnetic Dirac semimetals in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 186401 (2017).
Yang, B.-J., Bojesen, T. A., Morimoto, T. & Furusaki, A. Topological semimetals protected by off-centered symmetries in nonsymmorphic crystals. Phys. Rev. B 95, 075135 (2017).
Yu, R., Qi, X. L., Bernevig, A., Fang, Z. & Dai, X. Equivalent expression of \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) topological invariant for band insulatorsusing the non-Abelian Berry connection. Phys. Rev. B 84, 075119 (2011).
Alexandradinata, A., Dai, X. & Bernevig, B. A. Wilson-loop characterization of inversion-symmetric topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 89, 155114 (2014).
Alexandradinata, A., Wang, Z. & Bernevig, B. A. Topological insulators from group cohomology. Phys. Rev. X 6, 021008 (2016).
Bouhon, A., Black-Schaffer, A. M. & Slager, R.-J. Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band representations and topological crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 100, 195135 (2019).
Bradlyn, B., Wang, Z., Cano, J. & Bernevig, B. A. Disconnected elementary band representations, fragile topology, and Wilson loops as topological indices: an example on the triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. B 99, 045140 (2019).
Fidkowski, L., Jackson, T. S. & Klich, I. Model characterization of gapless edge modes of topological insulators using intermediate Brillouin-zone functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036601 (2011).
Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Quantized electric multipole insulators. Science 357, 61–66 (2017).
Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017).
Langbehn, J., Peng, Y., Trifunovic, L., von Oppen, F. & Brouwer, P. W. Reflection-symmetric second-order topological insulators and superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246401 (2017).
Schindler, F. et al. Higher-order topological insulators. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat0346 (2018).
Schindler, F. et al. Higher-order topology in bismuth. Nat. Phys. 14, 918 (2018).
Khalaf, E. Higher-order topological insulators and superconductors protected by inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 97, 205136 (2018).
Trifunovic, L. & Brouwer, P. W. Higher-order bulk-boundary correspondence for topological crystalline phases. Phys. Rev. X 9, 011012 (2019).
Lange, G. F., Bouhon, A. & Slager, R.-J. Subdimensional topologies, indicators, and higher order boundary effects. Phys. Rev. B 103, 195145 (2021).
Geier, M., Trifunovic, L., Hoskam, M. & Brouwer, P. W. Second-order topological insulators and superconductors with an order-two crystalline symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 97, 205135 (2018).
Hellenbrandt, M. The inorganic crystal structure database (ICSD)–present and future. Crystallogr. Rev. 10, 17–22 (2004).
Villars, P. & Hulliger, F. SpringerMaterials. https://materials.springer.com (2016).
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Zhang, T. et al. Catalogue of topological electronic materials. Nature 566, 475–479 (2019).
Tang, F., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Wan, X. Comprehensive search for topological materials using symmetry indicators. Nature 566, 486–489 (2019).
Vergniory, M. G. et al. A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials. Nature 566, 480–485 (2019).
Gallego, S. V. et al. MAGNDATA: towards a database of magnetic structures. I. The commensurate case. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1750–1776 (2016).
Vergniory, M. G. et al. All topological bands of all nonmagnetic stoichiometric materials. Science 376, eabg9094 (2022).
Sim, H. et al. Spontaneous structural distortion of the metallic Shastry-Sutherland system DyB4 by quadrupole-spin-lattice coupling. Phys. Rev. B 94, 195128 (2016).
Nikiforov, G. B., Kusainova, A. M., Berdonosov, P. S., Dolgikh, V. A. & Lightfoot, P. The crystal structure of the new REE-Te oxychlorides: NdTe2O5Cl and GdTe2O5Cl. J. Solid State Chem. 146, 473–477 (1999).
Varjas, D., de Juan, F. & Lu, Y.-M. Bulk invariants and topological response in insulators and superconductors with nonsymmorphic symmetries. Phys. Rev. B 92, 195116 (2015).
Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
Lin, K.-S. et al. Spin-resolved topology and partial axion angles in three-dimensional insulators. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10099 (2022).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof reply. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 891 (1998).
Mostofi, A. A. et al. An updated version of Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309–2310 (2014).
Zhi, G.-X., Xu, C., Wu, S.-Q., Ning, F. & Cao, C. WannSymm: a symmetry analysis code for Wannier orbitals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108196 (2022).
Wu, Q. S., Zhang, S. N., Song, H.-F., Troyer, M. & Soluyanov, A. A. WannierTools: an open-source software package for novel topological materials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405–416 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We thank Benjamin Wieder and Aris Alexandradinata for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science in Korea (Grant No. IBS-R009-D1), Samsung Science and Technology Foundation under Project Number SSTF-BA2002-06, and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1A2C4002773 and No. NRF-2021R1A5A1032996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.H., J.K., and J.L. performed the model and symmetry analyses. Y.Q., D.R., and H.C.C. performed the ab initio calculations. B.-J.Y. supervised the project. Y.H., Y.Q., H.C.C., and B.-J.Y. analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the discussion and manuscript revision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, Y., Qian, Y., Kang, J. et al. Magnetic wallpaper Dirac fermions and topological magnetic Dirac insulators. npj Comput Mater 9, 65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01018-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01018-3
- Springer Nature Limited
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.