Abstract
Pathologically increased beta power has been described as a biomarker for Parkinson’s disease (PD) and related to prolonged bursts of subthalamic beta synchronization. Here, we investigate the association between subthalamic beta dynamics and motor impairment in a cohort of 106 Parkinson’s patients in the ON- and OFF-medication state, using two different methods of beta burst determination. We report a frequency-specific correlation of low beta power and burst duration with motor impairment OFF dopaminergic medication. Furthermore, reduction of power and burst duration correlated significantly with symptom alleviation through dopaminergic medication. Importantly, qualitatively similar results were yielded with two different methods of beta burst definition. Our findings validate the robustness of previous results on pathological changes in subcortical oscillations both in the frequency- as well as in the time-domain in the largest cohort of PD patients to date with important implications for next-generation adaptive deep brain stimulation control algorithms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Intracerebral recordings from patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson’s disease (PD) have revealed increased subthalamic oscillatory beta band activity (13–35 Hz) as a pathophysiological hallmark of the PD motor state1,2,3,4,5,6. Both dopaminergic medication, as well as DBS, are associated with a decrease of this pathologically enhanced activity, specifically in the low beta sub-band (LB = 13–20 Hz), which has primarily been related to bradykinetic-rigid symptoms7,8,9,10,11,12. However, amplitude and temporal dynamics of high beta activity (20–35 Hz) seem implicated in bradykinetic-rigid symptoms13,14 and gait difficulties in PD as well15,16. Taken together, subthalamic beta activity has been shown to correlate with the entire spectrum of motor symptoms assessed by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Ratings Scale (UPDRS) in the dopamine-depleted state9,17, even months after chronic stimulation18,19.
Thus, beta activity is considered a stable biomarker of motor signs in PD and has been used as a feedback signal for therapeutic demand in experimental studies on adaptive closed-loop DBS (aDBS) with similar or better efficacy/side-effect profile than conventional DBS20,21,22,23.
The beneficial effects of aDBS have been linked to a shortening of pathologically prolonged periods of beta synchronization, so-called beta bursts. In contrast, the overall decrease of beta burst duration with conventional DBS24 possibly relies on the suppression of both short and long beta bursts25,26. Suppressing short beta bursts, however, might be disadvantageous as they are considered part of physiological signaling within the motor circuit27. Accordingly, a shift towards shorter beta bursts is observed with dopaminergic medication2,12,13, which has been correlated with clinical improvement in one study so far. With an increasing interest in the pathophysiological role of beta bursts in PD, novel methods of burst definition have recently been proposed28. These have been validated by investigating DBS-induced changes but have not been used for capturing dopamine-related dynamics of beta bursts yet24,29.
Most studies on the oscillatory activity of DBS-target structures have been conducted during or in the days following the implantation of DBS-electrodes, where the leads are still externalized, as chronic recordings from implanted pulse generators have become available only in the last couple of years30,31,32,33. Subcortical spectral densities and local cross-frequency coupling in the dopamine-depleted state of PD patients have been assessed in large cohorts of >50 PD patients (n = 63 in Neumann et al., 2016; n = 74 in Shreve et al., 2017)17,34. However, given that the dopamine-substituted state can rarely be assessed in the intra-operative setting and the concept of the pathophysiological role of temporal dynamics in oscillatory activity in PD emerged only recently, studies on dopaminergic effects on beta power or beta burst dynamics rely on much smaller cohorts of <25 PD patients9,12,13,14,24,35.
The present study aims to test the robustness of previous results on a dopamine-dependent correlation between subthalamic beta burst dynamics and motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease by (i) validating these findings in the largest cohort to date of >100 PD patients and (ii) comparing an established with a newly developed method of beta burst assessment.
Results
Correlation of beta power and motor impairment
Relative power spectra were averaged across contact pairs separately for the ON- and OFF-medication states. Each frequency bin was tested for differences across medication states, revealing a significant decrease (P < 0.001) of relative power between 10–19 Hz with dopaminergic medication when averaged across all channels or 10–20 Hz when only considering the channel with the most pronounced LB peak per hemisphere in the OFF medication state (see Fig. 1A). While significant correlation with symptom severity in the OFF medication state was found in a slightly broader spectrum (9–22 Hz), only frequencies within the LB band (13–19 Hz) were significantly associated to symptom alleviation with dopaminergic medication (see Fig. 1B). To remain comparable with previous studies, the following analyses were performed with a predefined LB band from 13 to 20 Hz, but results remained stable if the following analyses were performed by averaging over 13–19 Hz. When averaged across the LB band, there was a significant correlation between motor impairment as assessed by the UPDRS-III and LB power in the OFF-medication state (Rho = 0.21, P = 0.03, see Fig. 1C). While this correlation was not significant in the ON-medication state (P > 0.05), the dopamine-related motor improvement (UPDRS OFF–ON) was significantly associated with the reduction in LB band power (Rho = 0.36, P = 0.0008, see Fig. 1C) as well. Clinical subtypes showed no differences in overall LB power (P > 0.05). However, there was a symptom-specific correlation between LB power in the OFF medication state with bradykinesia (Rho = 0.3, P = 0.04) but not rigidity or tremor in the subset of patients in which UPDRS subscores were available (see Supplementary Fig. 1). In contrast, there was no symptom-specific correlation with LB power in the ON medication state, nor with medication-related symptom alleviation. Overall, there was no significant correlation between motor impairment or improvement with averaged HB power or averaged alpha power in none of the tested conditions mentioned above. Spectral peaks in the LB and HB bands showed a similar distribution across contact pairs, with most peaks found in the more dorsal contact pairs 23 and 12 (LB: 82% and HB: 83% of all detected peaks). The distribution of alpha-band peaks showed a more variable distribution across contacts with about 30% of detected peaks found in the lowermost contacts (see Supplementary Fig. 2). For a more detailed analysis of peak localization in this patient cohort (see ref. 36).
Correlation of beta burst duration and motor impairment
When using a baseline as established in Anderson et al., 2020, averaged LB burst duration was significantly prolonged after 12-h withdrawal of dopaminergic medication (OFF = 579.1 ± 469.1 ms; ON = 358.6 ± 230.2 ms; P < 0.0001) (see Fig. 2A). In the OFF-medication state, the averaged LB burst duration correlated significantly with motor impairment (Rho = 0.18, P = 0.05) as did the shortening of mean LB burst duration with motor improvement (Rho = 0.26, P = 0.008) (see Fig. 2B). There was a symptom-specific correlation of LB burst duration in the OFF medication state with bradykinesia (R = 0.31, P = 0.03) and rigidity (R = 0.35, P = 0.01) but not tremor symptoms in the subset of patients with UPDRS subscores (see Supplementary Fig. 1). There was no significant correlation between LB burst duration and motor impairment in the ON-medication state. When burst time bins were tested separately, motor impairment in the OFF state was positively correlated with the number of bursts above 500 ms length (500–600 ms: Rho = 0.29, P = 0.005; 600–700 ms: Rho = 0.26, P = 0.01) and negatively correlated with short beta bursts (100–200 ms: Rho = −0.18, P = 0.05; 200–300 ms: Rho = −0.2, P = 0.03) (see Fig. 2C). Accordingly, changes in short and long bursts may best reflect symptom alleviation with medication (100–200 ms: Rho = −0.19, P = 0.04; 200–300 ms: Rho = −0.2, P = 0.03; >700 ms: Rho = 0.26, P = 0.02) (see Fig. 2C). However, these time-bin-specific results did not survive FDR-correction for multiple comparisons. There was no significant correlation between motor symptoms and LB burst amplitude or HB burst properties in either medication state.
Comparison of different methods for burst detection
As expected, beta bursts were significantly shorter when using the common threshold method based on the 75th percentile of the amplitude distribution (OFF = 304.9 ± 42.3 ms vs. 579.1 ± 469.1 ms, P < 0.001; ON = 289.4 ± 36.7 ms vs. 358.6 ± 230.2 ms; P = 0.001). However, there was a significant correlation between averaged burst duration between both methods (OFF: Rho = 0.56, P < 0.001; ON: Rho = 0.63, P < 0.001), specifically with regard to the amount of very short and very long LB bursts in both medication states (OFF: 100–200 ms: Rho = 0.46, P < 0.001; >700 ms: Rho = 0.53, P < 0.001; ON: 100–200 ms: Rho = 0.52, P < 0.001; >700 ms: Rho = 0.53, P < 0.001).
In the OFF medication state, common threshold-based results were qualitatively similar to the baseline-based results with a frequency-specific correlation between mean LB burst duration and motor impairment (Rho = 0.27, P = 0.008) that may rely on the number of long bursts (>700 ms: Rho = 0.22, P = 0.02) and negatively associated with the amount of very short bursts (100–200 ms: Rho = 0.18, P = 0.05; uncorrected). However, dopamine-related changes were less well captured by the common threshold-based method. While a significant reduction of averaged burst duration with medication was observed (OFF = 304.9 ± 42.3 ms; ON = 289.4 ± 36.7 ms; P < 0.0001), its amount did not correlate with symptom alleviation, neither when averaged across all bursts nor when considered separately for each time bin. For a summary of common threshold-based results (see Supplementary Fig. 3).
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated the association between subthalamic beta power and bursts with motor symptoms as well as their change with dopaminergic medication in a large cohort of 106 PD patients. We show a significant correlation between motor symptom severity in the OFF medication state and oscillatory activity from ~10 to 20 Hz. Moreover, the medication-related reduction of LB power (13–20 Hz) was paralleled by a dopamine-related symptom alleviation. Similar to LB power, averaged LB burst duration significantly correlated with motor impairment in the OFF medication state, as did the dopamine-related reduction of LB burst duration with symptom alleviation when using the noise floor as a baseline. All observed effects were frequency-specific for the LB band and a sub-analysis suggested that they might be driven by bradykinetic symptoms. We thus provide further evidence for temporal dynamics of LB activity as a robust biomarker of motor symptoms in a large cohort of PD patients, relatively independent of the exact method used for burst determination.
Our results are in line with previous studies, demonstrating a correlation between parkinsonian symptoms in the OFF medication state17 and a specific dopamine-sensitivity of activity mainly covering the LB band37, which has also been described for DBS-related effects10. A recent study combining magnetoencephalography, subthalamic vs. pallidal LFP, and computational modeling, has attributed the difference of high- and low-beta to the hyperdirect- and indirect-pathway38. The findings support the notion that PD symptoms may arise from hyperactivity of the indirect pathway, while hyperdirect cortico-subthalamic communication is implicated in cognitive control and motor inhibition39,40.
Regarding the more recently emerged concept of pathologically prolonged beta bursts in the OFF medication state, frequency-specificity for the LB band has been explicitly reported only in one study investigating the association between beta bursts and bradykinesia11. In two other studies, beta bursts were determined around beta peak frequencies, the average of which lied in the LB band as well (Tinkhauser et al., 2017: 19.9 Hz; Lofredi et al., 2019: 14.3 Hz). Not all studies have produced this distinction of high- and low beta activity, e.g. a more recently published study reported a frequency-specific correlation of high beta burst duration with motor symptoms13. The precise differences remain unknown, but it is important to note that potentially electrode impedance and spatial coverage may have an impact on the recorded frequency bands in LFP41. All of the aforementioned studies reported results on <25 PD patients. The present study provides further evidence that in a large cohort, the best across-patient correlation with symptom severity is obtained with burst properties in the LB band.
Methodologically, a vivid scientific controversy has risen around the potential pitfalls of burst determination. Earlier studies established thresholds for bursts based on amplitude distribution either by considering only amplitudes above a specific percentile12 or median deviation42 that were applied by following studies2,11,13,43,44,45. Others tried to train discriminators on artificially generated time series for burst detection, which is a promising direction but might need further knowledge on the underlying amplitude distribution before assuring to generate physiologically meaningful results25. More recently, a novel method of burst determination, using a physiological baseline based on the recording-specific noise floor was proposed28 and used in several studies investigating DBS-associated beta burst dynamics in PD patients with chronically implanted pulse generators24,29. However, this method had not been used to assess dopamine-related beta burst dynamics in externalized recordings of PD patients yet. Here, we obtain similar burst durations in the OFF medication state than these studies, which were moreover qualitatively similar, in both used methodological approaches. This provides further evidence for a stable, hardware-independent, medication- as well as stimulation-sensitive and thus pathophysiological relevant correlation between temporal dynamics of LB activity and motor state in PD patients.
Although subthalamic LB power and burst duration appear as robust biomarkers across PD patients, the explained variance of motor symptom severity remains relatively low, with rho-values ranging around 0.4–0.5 in previous studies and 0.18–0.36 in the present study with the largest cohort to date. This low explanatory power might relate to the following aspects: First, subthalamic LB power and burst duration might reflect similar aspects of the Parkinsonian motor state given that burst duration and amplitude are highly correlated. Thus, combining both does not significantly increase the explained variance. Second, LB power and burst properties lose their explanatory value for symptom severity when considering the ON medication state, and additional features beyond beta, such as movement- or dyskinesia-related low-frequency or gamma activity may be more performative in this state43,46. Third, an individualized investigation of combined spectral changes assessed on a case-by-case basis avoiding the need for spectral normalization may outperform the information content of spectral features based on group results for individual patients. Thus, while our study provides clear evidence for the pathophysiological relevance of LB in PD, other frequency bands may be better suited to act as control signals in individual patients. Also, cortical signals might be advantageous when compared to subcortical activity patterns in decoding-specific motor states47,48. In the same vein, multisite recordings could be necessary if the entirety of motor- and non-motor symptoms have to be captured, given that PD is considered a network disease and pathological interregional connections have been described, specifically for motor cortical areas49,50,51. Interestingly, a first pioneering study investigating symptom correlations from combined chronic ECoG and LFP recordings in freely moving patients found different combinations of recording source (Motor cortex vs. STN vs. Motor cortex–STN coupling) and frequency band (alpha, beta, gamma) for each of the five patients to be most predictive of symptom severity52.
In conclusion, our study corroborates and extends previous findings on the pathophysiological relevance of beta burst dynamics in PD. Moreover, our findings highlight the importance of understanding temporal brain circuit dynamics to inspire the design of bidirectional control algorithms for on-demand adaptive neuromodulation. The fact that the shift from very short to pathologically prolonged bursts can be observed in such a large cohort of PD patients increases the confidence that an aDBS-approach, where stimulation would be triggered by beta amplitude threshold crossings of specific lengths, can be viable and advantageous in clinical settings. Large multicenter trials are currently in development with manufacturers offering first generations of commercially available sensing-enabled devices. Our results suggest that aDBS trials should implement temporal threshold parameters beyond the single or dual power threshold paradigms to consider temporal burst dynamics as a key hallmark of pathological basal ganglia activity in PD.
Methods
Patients and surgery
For this study, we have identified archival local field potential (LFP) data from 106 PD patients (63.5 ± 8 years, 42 female, clinical subtype: 47% akinetic-rigid; 20% tremor-dominant; 33% equivalent) who underwent bilateral implantation of subthalamic DBS-electrodes. For detailed clinical information, see Table 1. In 95 cases, assessment of motor impairment using the UPDRS-III (denominated UDPRS in the following) was available both under regular dopaminergic medication (ON state) and at least 12 h after dopaminergic drug withdrawal (OFF state) either pre-operatively (n = 28) or during the recording sessions (n = 67). In a subset of patients (n = 49), sub-scores for bradykinesia (UPDRS III items 6.a-9.b, item 14), rigidity (UPDRS-III items 5.a-5.e), and tremor (UPDRS-III items 3.a-4.b) were available in both medication states and used for a symptom-specific sub-analysis of neurophysiological markers. Motor impairment was significantly more pronounced in the OFF than in the ON medication state (UPDRS-OFF: 32.7 ± 12.7, UPDRS-ON: 18.3 ± 9.3, P = 0.002). All patients gave written informed consent, which was approved by the local ethics committees (Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Medizinische Hochschule Hannover) in accordance with the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki. Three types of DBS-macroelectrodes were used: Medtronic 3389 (n = 80), Boston Vercise with circular electrodes (n = 11), and Boston Vercise Cartesia (n = 15), in which mid-contacts are segmented. Intraoperative microelectrode recordings, test stimulation, and postoperative imaging ensured correct DBS‐electrode placement. A subset from a previous study (n = 45) that assessed beta power in the OFF medication state of PD patients has been included in the present cohort17.
Recordings
Subthalamic LFP recordings of at least 200 s were performed in the ON- and OFF medication state in the 1–7 days following DBS surgery. Patients were comfortably seated and instructed not to move during the recording. Signals were amplified (50,000×) using a D360 amplifier (Digitimer, Hertfordshire, UK) and recorded at a sampling frequency of 1 kHz through a 1401 A-D converter (CED, Cambridge, UK) onto a computer using Spike2 software. When electrode contacts were circular, bipolar LFPs were recorded between adjacent contact pairs. In directional leads, recordings were referenced to the lowermost contact of the electrode, subsequently summed and re-referenced offline to approximate the bipolar recordings derived from adjacent pairs of circular contacts, for example: (contact 1/2 + contact 1/3 + contact 1/4)−(contact 1/5 + contact 1/6 + contact1/7).
Signal processing
Artifact-free recording segments were identified visually and analyzed using custom MATLAB code (The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) based on SPM12 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) and FieldTrip (http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/). Continuous recordings were filtered (high pass = 5 Hz, low pass = 98 Hz, and notch filter = 48–52 Hz) and transferred into the frequency domain using Morlet wavelets with 10 cycles and a temporal resolution of 200 Hz. Power spectra were derived through averaging over time and normalized to the total sum of the recording and further expressed as a percentage of total power. Normalization allows comparison across participants as arbitrary amplitude differences due to electrode impedance, specifically related to the surface difference in segmented vs. ring electrodes, and distance to the source is removed. Frequency bands of interest in this study were predefined as alpha (8–12 Hz), low beta (LB, 13–20 Hz), and high beta (HB, 21–35 Hz) bands. Spectral peak frequencies and the channel displaying the highest spectral peak in the respective frequency bands of interest (alpha = 8–12 Hz, LB = 13–20 Hz, HB = 21–35 Hz) were automatically detected (see Fig. 3). For correlative analyses with motor impairment, power values in each frequency band were calculated for the channel with highest peak frequency amplitude in the OFF medication state, separately for each hemisphere and averaged across hemispheres. There was no significant shift in peak frequency from the OFF to the ON medication state (P > 0.05) and no difference in band-specific power between male and female subjects (P > 0.05) in either frequency band.
Beta burst analysis
For burst determination, the bipolar channel with the highest peak in the respective frequency band was selected in the OFF medication state and used for both medication states. Two methods were used separately for burst determination and compared qualitatively. The first method was recently established and qualifies beta bursts when beta activity exceeds the overall noise floor within a recording24,28. For this approach, the raw signal was bandpass-filtered around the frequency band of interest (here low or high beta band) and envelope peaks of the squared signal were linearly connected to generate an amplitude envelope. A beta burst was detected when the amplitude crossed a threshold defined as four times the median of averaged troughs from envelopes of five overlapping 6 Hz bands in the low gamma band (55–65 Hz) from the same recording. The second method was used in previous publications by the authors2,11,43, qualifying beta bursts as events in which beta activity is significantly higher than the overall beta amplitude distribution. Here, the wavelet amplitude was separately averaged across the respective frequency band of interest and smoothed with a moving average Gaussian smoothing kernel (175 ms). Each power amplitude trace was z-scored (X−μ/δ) over the entire recording, separately for the ON- and OFF-medication state. The threshold for bursts was defined as the 75th percentile of the normalized signal amplitude distribution. A separate threshold was calculated in the ON and OFF medication state and the average of both was applied for burst determination in both medication states. In both methods, beta burst duration was defined as time spent above the defined threshold. The distribution of burst durations was considered by categorization into 7-time windows of 100 ms starting from 100 ms to >700 ms in duration. As for power analyses, obtained values were averaged across hemispheres for correlative analyses with motor impairment.
Statistics
First, each frequency bin (1 Hz) of the power spectral density was tested for (i) changes with medication and (ii) correlation with symptom severity as assessed by the UPDRS-III. In the following, power was averaged over canonical frequency bands, low (13–20 Hz) and high (21–35 Hz) beta bands, respectively, and tested for correlation with symptom severity. For burst analyses, averaged burst duration as well as the relative amount of bursts with a duration between 100 ms and >700 ms were correlated with UPDRS-III scores. In a sub-analysis with 49 PD patients, averaged power and burst duration were separately correlated with summed scores for bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. Across all analyses, nonparametric Monte Carlo permutation tests with 5000 permutations were used for statistical analyses as they do not rely on assumptions about the underlying data distribution. For correlative analyses, Spearman’s correlation (denoted as Rho) was calculated and tested for significance using permutation. All results are indicated as mean ± standard deviation and reported significant at an α level of 0.05. Multiple comparisons were controlled by using the detection of the false discovery rate (FDR) where appropriate.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author in the framework of a data-sharing agreement. The data are not publicly available as this would compromise the privacy of research participants according to the current General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union.
References
Geng, X. et al. Comparison of oscillatory activity in subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease and dystonia. Neurobiol. Dis. 98, 100–107 (2017).
Lofredi, R. et al. Pallidal beta bursts in Parkinson’s disease and dystonia. Mov. Disord. 34, 420–424, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27524 (2019).
Silberstein, P. et al. Patterning of globus pallidus local field potentials differs between Parkinson’s disease and dystonia. Brain 126, 2597 (2003).
Wang, D. D. et al. Pallidal deep-brain stimulation disrupts pallidal beta oscillations and coherence with primary motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 38, 4556–4568 (2018).
Rauschenberger, L. et al. A translational perspective on pathophysiological changes of oscillatory activity in dystonia and parkinsonism. Exp. Neurol. 355, 114140 (2022).
Lofredi, R. & Kühn, A. A. In Electrophysiological Connectivity Measures from Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)-Targets in Parkinson’s Disease and Dystonia (eds. Horn, A.) Ch. 16 339–356 (Academic Press, 2022).
Eusebio, A. et al. Deep brain stimulation can suppress pathological synchronisation in parkinsonian patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 82, 569–573 (2011).
Kühn, A. A. et al. High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus suppresses oscillatory β activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease in parallel with improvement in motor performance. J. Neurosci. 28, 6165–6173 (2008).
Kühn, A. A., Kupsch, A., Schneider, G.-H. & Brown, P. Reduction in subthalamic 8–35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 1956–1960 (2006).
Oswal, A. et al. Deep brain stimulation modulates synchrony within spatially and spectrally distinct resting state networks in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 139, 1482–1496, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww048 (2016).
Lofredi, R. et al. Beta bursts during continuous movements accompany the velocity decrement in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurobiol. Dis. 127, 462–471 (2019).
Tinkhauser, G. et al. Beta burst dynamics in Parkinson’s disease OFF and ON dopaminergic medication. Brain 140, 2968–2981 (2017).
Sure, M., Vesper, J., Schnitzler, A. & Florin, E. Dopaminergic modulation of spectral and spatial characteristics of Parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus beta bursts. Front. Neurosci. 15, 1450 (2021).
Neuville, R. S. et al. Differential effects of pathological beta burst dynamics between Parkinson’s disease phenotypes across different movements. Front. Neurosci. 15, 1–10 (2021).
Godinho, F. et al. Spectral characteristics of subthalamic nucleus local field potentials in Parkinson’s disease: phenotype and movement matter. Eur. J. Neurosci. 53, 2804–2818 (2021).
Toledo, J. B. et al. High beta activity in the subthalamic nucleus and freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 64, 60–65 (2014).
Neumann, W.-J. et al. Subthalamic synchronized oscillatory activity correlates with motor impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 31, 1748–1751 (2016).
Neumann, W.-J. et al. Long term correlation of subthalamic beta band activity with motor impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. J. Int. Fed. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 2286–2291 (2017).
Trager, M. H. et al. Subthalamic beta oscillations are attenuated after withdrawal of chronic high frequency neurostimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 96, 22–30 (2016).
Little, S. et al. Bilateral adaptive deep brain stimulation is effective in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 87, 717–721 (2016).
Little, S. et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 74, 449–457 (2013).
Piña-Fuentes, D. et al. Toward adaptive deep brain stimulation for dystonia. Neurosurg. Focus 45, E3 (2018).
Pina-Fuentes, D. et al. Adaptive DBS in a Parkinson’s patient with chronically implanted DBS: a proof of principle. Mov. Disord. 32, 1253–1254 (2017).
Kehnemouyi, Y. M. et al. Modulation of beta bursts in subthalamic sensorimotor circuits predicts improvement in bradykinesia. Brain 144, 473–486 (2021).
Schmidt, S. L., Peters, J. J., Turner, D. A. & Grill, W. M. Continuous deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus may not modulate beta bursts in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Stimul. 13, 433–443 (2020).
Tinkhauser, G. et al. The modulatory effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation on beta bursts in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 140, 1053–1067 (2017).
Shin, H., Law, R., Tsutsui, S., Moore, C. I. & Jones, S. R. The rate of transient beta frequency events predicts behavior across tasks and species. Elife 6, 1–31 (2017).
Anderson, R. W. et al. A novel method for calculating beta band burst durations in Parkinson’s disease using a physiological baseline. J. Neurosci. Methods 343, 108811 (2020).
Anidi, C. et al. Neuromodulation targets pathological not physiological beta bursts during gait in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 120, 107–117 (2018).
Feldmann, L. K. et al. Toward therapeutic electrophysiology: beta-band suppression as a biomarker in chronic local field potential recordings. npj Park. Dis. 8, 44 (2022).
Feldmann, L. K. et al. Subthalamic beta band suppression reflects effective neuromodulation in chronic recordings. Eur. J. Neurol. 28, 2372–2377 (2021).
Scheller, U. et al. Pallidal low-frequency activity in dystonia after cessation of long-term deep brain stimulation. Mov. Disord. 34, 1734–1739 (2019).
Neumann, W.-J. et al. Deep brain recordings using an implanted pulse generator in Parkinson’s disease. Neuromodulation 19, 20–24 (2016).
Shreve, L. A. et al. Subthalamic oscillations and phase amplitude coupling are greater in the more affected hemisphere in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. J. Int. Fed. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 128–137 (2017).
Doyle, L. M. F. et al. Levodopa-induced modulation of subthalamic beta oscillations during self-paced movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21, 1403–1412, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03969.x (2005).
Darcy, N. et al. Spectral and spatial distribution of subthalamic beta peak activity in Parkinson’s disease patients. Exp. Neurol. 356, 114150 (2022).
Priori, A. et al. Rhythm-specific pharmacological modulation of subthalamic activity in Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 189, 369–379 (2004).
Oswal, A. et al. Neural signatures of hyperdirect pathway activity in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Commun. 12, 5185 (2021).
Lofredi, R. et al. Subthalamic stimulation impairs stopping of ongoing movements. Brain 144, 44–52 (2021).
Neumann, W.-J. et al. Functional segregation of basal ganglia pathways in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 141, 2655–2669 (2018).
Buzsáki, G. Rhythms of the Brain (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Feingold, J., Gibson, D. J., DePasquale, B. & Graybiel, A. M. Bursts of beta oscillation differentiate postperformance activity in the striatum and motor cortex of monkeys performing movement tasks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13687–13692 (2015).
Lofredi, R. et al. Dopamine-dependent scaling of subthalamic gamma bursts with movement velocity in patients with Parkinsonas disease. Elife 7, e31895, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife (2018).
Torrecillos, F. et al. Modulation of beta bursts in the subthalamic nucleus predicts motor performance. J. Neurosci. 38, 8905–8917 (2018).
Neumann, W.-J. et al. Pallidal and thalamic neural oscillatory patterns in Tourette’s syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 84, 505–514 (2018).
Alegre, M. et al. Subthalamic activity during diphasic dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 27, 1178–1181 (2012).
Swann, N. C. et al. Gamma oscillations in the hyperkinetic state detected with chronic human brain recordings in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 36, 6445–6458 (2016).
Merk, T. et al. Electrocorticography is superior to subthalamic local field potentials for movement decoding in Parkinson’s disease. Elife 11, e75126, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75126 (2022).
Swann, N. C. et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease using motor cortex sensing. J. Neural Eng. 15, 046006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aabc9b (2018).
de Hemptinne, C. et al. Therapeutic deep brain stimulation reduces cortical phase-amplitude coupling in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 779–786 (2015).
Litvak, V. et al. Movement-related changes in local and long-range synchronization in Parkinson’s disease revealed by simultaneous magnetoencephalography and intracranial recordings. J. Neurosci. 32, 10541–10553 (2012).
Gilron, R. et al. Long-term wireless streaming of neural recordings for circuit discovery and adaptive stimulation in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1078–1085 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all patients for their participation. R.L. is a participant in the BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program funded by the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and the Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH). The work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project-ID 424778381—TRR 295 Retune).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.L. was responsible for the conception and design of the study as well as the acquisition and analysis of data and drafting of a significant portion of the manuscript or figures. L.O., F.I., and W.-J.N. performed parts of the data analysis. C.B., W.-J.N., J.H., G.-H.S., K.F., J.K.K. helped with the acquisition of the data. A.A.K. was responsible for the conception and design of the study and for drafting a significant portion of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
F.I., C.B., J.H., and L.O. report no conflicts of interest, outside the submitted work. R.L., W.-J.N., A.A.K., J.K.K., G.-H.S., and K.F. report no competing non-financial interests but the following financial interests, received outside of the submitted work: R.L. and W.-J.N. report personal fees from Medtronic. A.A.K. reports personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Ipsen Pharma, and personal fees from Teva, outside the submitted work. J.K.K. reports personal fees from Medtronic, and personal fees from Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. G.-H.S. and K.F. report personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Boston Scientific, and personal fees from Abbott, outside the submitted work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lofredi, R., Okudzhava, L., Irmen, F. et al. Subthalamic beta bursts correlate with dopamine-dependent motor symptoms in 106 Parkinson’s patients. npj Parkinsons Dis. 9, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00443-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00443-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Clinico-physiological correlates of Parkinson’s disease from multi-resolution basal ganglia recordings
npj Parkinson's Disease (2024)
-
Modulation of subthalamic beta oscillations by movement, dopamine, and deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease
npj Parkinson's Disease (2024)
-
Applications of OPM-MEG for translational neuroscience: a perspective
Translational Psychiatry (2024)
-
Pathological basal ganglia oscillations with time delays: a memoryless feedback control strategy
Control Theory and Technology (2024)
-
Average power and burst analysis revealed complementary information on drug-related changes of motor performance in Parkinson’s disease
npj Parkinson's Disease (2023)