Abstract
The influenza vaccine field has been constantly evolving to improve the speed, scalability, and flexibility of manufacturing, and to improve the breadth and longevity of the protective immune response across age groups, giving rise to an array of next generation vaccines in development. Among these, the recombinant influenza vaccine tetravalent (RIV4), using a baculovirus expression vector system to express recombinant haemagglutinin (rHA) in insect cells, is the only one to have reached the market and has been studied extensively. We describe how the unique structural features of rHA in RIV4 improve protective immune responses compared to conventional influenza vaccines made from propagated influenza virus. In addition to the sequence integrity, characteristic of recombinant proteins, unique post-translational processing of the rHA in insect cells instills favourable tertiary and quaternary structural features. The absence of protease-driven cleavage and addition of simple N-linked glycans help to preserve and expose certain conserved epitopes on HA molecules, which are likely responsible for the high levels of broadly cross-reactive and protective antibodies with rare specificities observed with RIV4. Furthermore, the presence of uniform compact HA oligomers and absence of egg proteins, viral RNA or process impurities, typically found in conventional vaccines, are expected to eliminate potential adverse reactions to these components in susceptible individuals with the use of RIV4. These distinct structural features and purity of the recombinant HA vaccine thus provide a number of benefits in vaccine performance which can be extended to other viral targets, such as for COVID-19.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Seasonal influenza is responsible for 290,000–650,000 deaths per year due to respiratory diseases alone and 3–5 million cases of severe illness worldwide1,2,3. In the USA, influenza was thought to account for 52.7 hospitalisations per 100,000 people during the 2019–2020 season. These numbers are significantly higher in young children and adults aged 65 and older1,2,4. Extra-pulmonary complications of influenza infection constitute a further under-recognised disease burden4,5. Overall, such a high disease burden carries substantial social and economic cost6,7. Prevention of seasonal influenza epidemics, as well as preparedness for future pandemics, is thus a global priority.
Influenza A subtypes H1N1 and H3N2, and influenza B lineages B/Yamagata and B/Victoria circulate routinely in humans and are included in seasonal influenza vaccines8. Influenza A subtypes can also give rise to highly pathogenic viruses through cross-over from animal reservoirs to humans9. In the past century, four novel influenza A virus strains have emerged in this way, each leading to a global pandemic (H1N1 in 1918; H2N2 in 1957; H3N2 in 1968; and H1N1 in 2009). Vaccines against such strains are prepared and stockpiled as government initiatives for emergency use in potential future pandemics.
Haemagglutinin (HA) is the primary antigen in the induction of a protective immune response against the influenza virus, and thus a key vaccine target. Expressed as trimeric glycoproteins on the viral surface, HA binds to sialic acid on target cells to facilitate host cell entry and mediates the fusion of the viral envelope to the late endosomal membrane. Neutralising antibodies that block HA effectively prevent viral entry into target cells and have been shown to protect the host from infection10,11. Another viral surface protein, neuraminidase (NA), cleaves sialic acid and releases budding virus from the infected cells, thus serving as another important vaccine target. Although the presence of NA is not required for effective vaccine performance12, its inclusion in annual influenza vaccination may help to broaden protection and reduce influenza severity13,14.
The preparation of the annual influenza vaccine firstly requires the identification of the influenza strains and their like strains, most likely to spread during the upcoming season, for inclusion in the vaccine. Identification of the target influenza strains is based on surveillance data collected by World Health Organization (WHO) collaborating centres at six locations in the UK, USA (including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]), Japan, China and Australia as part of the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS)15. The final decision on resulting vaccine targets is made by individual regulatory bodies.
Influenza vaccines can afford significant protection against influenza illness, even when there is an antigenic mismatch against the predominant circulating virus strains16,17. Such cross-protection can occur through the priming of the immune system by vaccination or natural infection and is primarily due to antibodies specific to conserved regions on the HA head and stem18. Vaccines that can induce immunity specific to circulating wild-type strains and cross-protection to related strains would be ideal against constantly evolving influenza viruses. As such, the conserved regions on the HA head and stem present attractive targets for development of universal influenza vaccines19,20.
The annual production of influenza vaccine through conventional, mostly egg-based platforms, is arduous and a race-against-time21. The production process, from the selection of influenza strains to vaccine manufacture and release for distribution, takes eight to nine months each year. Agile, reliable and egg-free technologies allowing for guaranteed and faster manufacture of influenza vaccines are needed to ensure timely delivery for upcoming epidemic seasons and during potential avian flu pandemics, when egg supply may be impacted. The adoption of alternative vaccine development approaches (including mRNA, vector, and recombinant protein strategies) in the urgent response to the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the feasibility of using more efficient methods to produce new, effective vaccines within accelerated development timelines. The recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4, Flublok®, Supemtek® [EU, Canada], Sanofi Pasteur) was the first licensed influenza vaccine to be produced using recombinant viral proteins instead of antigens derived from live influenza virus (as for inactivated split-virion and subunit vaccines). RIV4 is an unadjuvanted vaccine containing 45 µg of HA/dose from each of the four strains. The production of RIV4 is based on a novel production platform in which recombinant HA (rHA) is expressed in insect cells using a baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS)22. In brief, expresSF+ insect cells are infected with recombinant baculovirus carrying the relevant influenza HA genes, which are expressed under the control of a baculovirus polyhedrin promotor. rHA molecules from the infected cells are extracted using detergent and purified from the clarified cell extract using column chromatographies followed by Q membrane filtration. Purified rHA is suspended in relevant buffer using tangential flow filtration and passed through sterile filtration for storage and formulation22. RIV4 has undergone extensive clinical assessment23, and was first approved by FDA in 2013. It is now licensed in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and various other countries.
This review focuses on the structural features of BEVS-derived rHA that make RIV4 unique from conventional vaccines, and how these features help to maximise vaccine performance. Notably, the benefits of this manufacturing process can be extended to other viral targets, such as COVID-19, where the preservation of conserved epitopes is critical for imparting cross-protection against a constantly evolving and mutating virus.
Potential antigenic mismatch of influenza vaccine virus grown in egg or cells due to adaptive mutations in the HA primary structure
A known risk of traditional split or subunit vaccines is the potential for the candidate vaccine virus or working virus seeds to acquire adaptive mutations as they grow in embryonated chicken egg or mammalian host cells during vaccine manufacture. Such adaptive mutations in HA peptides may reduce the effectiveness of the resultant vaccine24,25,26. Raymond et al.24 showed that an egg-adapted A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) vaccine strain acquired a mutation resulting in the substitution of glutamine with arginine at position 226 which in turn induced antibodies specific to receptor binding site that bound to vaccine-derived HA preferentially over the circulating wild-type virus24. During the 2012–2013 northern hemisphere influenza vaccination campaign, HA from an egg-adapted A/Victoria/361/2011 (H3N2) virus used for vaccine manufacturing differed from the WHO-recommended prototype and several other wild-type influenza viruses in three positions, H156Q, G186V, and S219Y25. The low vaccine effectiveness (41%) observed for H3N2 in the 2012–2013 season was attributed to these three mutations during vaccine production25. Other antigenic mutations introduced by egg-adaptation of the vaccine strain during vaccine manufacturing are thought to have contributed to low vaccine effectiveness estimates for H3N2 in other influenza seasons26,27.
Lower vaccine effectiveness estimates have been observed for H3N2 than for other strains since 2009, even during seasons when the selected vaccine strain appeared to be well matched to circulating strains27. Differences in HA glycosylation between the vaccine strains and circulating strains are thought to have contributed to this reduced vaccine effectiveness26. During the 2014–2015 influenza season, a clade 3 C.2a H3N2 strain possessing a new predicted HA glycosylation site emerged26. For the 2016–2017 season, the influenza vaccine was updated to include a clade 3 C.2a H3N2 strain (A/Colorado/15/2014) containing the new glycosylation site26. However, this particular glycosylation site was absent in the egg-adapted virus. Consequently, antibodies induced in humans, and in ferrets, poorly neutralised the glycosylated clade 3 C.2a H3N2 strain26. Contrary to the egg-derived vaccines and as expected, rHA containing the new glycosylation site induced optimal levels of antibodies that efficiently recognised the glycosylated clade 3 C.2a H3N2 virus26. The chances of introducing deleterious mutations through the adaptation of seed virus during vaccine manufacturing today are low due to the stringent quality control of the working seed virus. Indeed, as per current regulatory requirements, seed viruses must be confirmed for both genetic and antigenic match with their originating wild-type virus before they can be used for vaccine production. Nonetheless, the time it takes to generate appropriate seeds could hinder the timely availability of the vaccines.
Recombinant DNA technology avoids the risk of the virus acquiring egg- or cell-adapted mutations during the manufacturing process as it does not use ‘live’ influenza virus. Instead, DNA coding for HA is cloned from a reference virus published in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database and is confirmed for fidelity at the working virus bank level28. As such, the primary amino-acid sequence of the rHA produced using baculovirus or other recombinant expression system is identical to the HA from the wild-type virus isolate selected for seasonal influenza vaccine production. Thus, the risk of antigenic mismatch of RIV4, or other rHA vaccines in development, with the wildtype influenza strain selected for vaccines is eliminated.
Recombinant HA expression systems
Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems have been used for the manufacture of rHA vaccine antigens. The first candidate recombinant influenza vaccines to be successfully manufactured using an Escherichia coli fermentation system involved expression of the globular head domain of the HA protein genetically fused with the Toll-like receptor 5 agonist, Salmonella typhimurium flagellin type 229. The resultant vaccines elicited strong and protective antibody responses in mouse models29. In Phase 1 clinical evaluation, a prototypic quadrivalent vaccine developed using this E. coli platform elicited immune responses in healthy adults with favourable tolerability30. The E. coli expression system has been shown to generate a high yields of rHA (200 mg/L of purified HA protein) using a minimal number of bioreactors31. The authors projected that the strategy could yield up to half a billion doses of vaccine per month in a medium-scale pharmaceutical production facility31. This approach will likely shorten the entire vaccine manufacturing process32. However, E. coli-expressed rHA proteins can be subject to mis-folding, contain impurities (e.g., host-cell proteins), and do not undergo glycosylation33. They therefore need extensive processing to attain desired purity and to fold to their native conformation31. The resulting processed proteins are less immunogenic than egg-derived antigens, with around a 10-fold greater quantity needed to generate protective immunity in animal models31. These inherent complications have prevented large scale manufacturing and eventual commercialisation of E. coli-expressed influenza vaccines.
Vaccines containing plant-derived rHA either in soluble form or in virus-like particles (VLPs) have been shown to be safe and immunogenic in humans34,35,36,37. A plant-derived recombinant quadrivalent VLP (QVLP) at 30 µg dose per strain was found to be non-inferior in terms of vaccine efficacy against respiratory illness and influenza-like illness to a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV; Fluarix Quadrivalent, GlaxoSmithKline) given at 15 µg dose/strain in adults aged 18 to 64 years37. However, inconsistency in the expression levels of target proteins, due to nonspecific integration of transgene(s) into the host genome, has been a major challenge with plant-based expression systems34. The unpredictable yield could adversely impact timely vaccine production, which typically involves updating at least one HA component of the vaccine to reflect antigenic change in the circulating influenza viruses each season. A unique positive attribute of plant-derived rHA is that it can stimulate innate immunity that predominantly facilitates Type 1 pro-inflammatory cellular immune responses, potentially as a direct effect of the plant-origin lipids/glycolipids in the vaccine formulation38. These stimulatory components in a plant-derived vaccine may need to be controlled and kept at a constant level, for commercialisation, to avoid potential severe adverse events caused by enhanced immune responses in vaccinees.
Several groups have explored the use of adenovirus (AdV), primarily as a replication-defective vector, for gene delivery and transgene expression of rHA in the host cells. AdV vectors induce both cell-mediated and humoral immunity against the expressed protein, providing robust protection against the targeted disease39,40,41. However, pre-existing or acquired immunity against adenovirus can hamper vaccine effectiveness by neutralising the vaccine vector and clearing the vector-infected cells. While the use of non-human adenovirus vectors could potentially overcome this issue, AdV vector immunity developed through repeated immunisation (for example during repeated annual influenza vaccinations) can dampen the immune response against the vaccine antigens39,40.
RIV4 is one of only two available influenza vaccines that are egg-free. Like other recombinant vaccines, expression of HA in insect cells does not depend on the generation of reassortant candidate vaccine viruses selected for robust growth in embryonated eggs or mammalian cell-lines. Instead, HA genetic sequences from the wild-type strains selected for inclusion in the vaccine are inserted into the BEVS, from which high yields of rHA are harvested and purified (Fig. 1). This process requires less than half the time (2–3 months) required for the manufacture of conventional influenza vaccines42,43. This is a critical advantage for the timely supply of influenza vaccine for both seasonal epidemics and in pandemic situations. VLPs have been produced successfully by integrating HA, capsid protein (M1) and neuraminidase (NA) expressed in insect cells44,45,46. Although presenting proteins in VLP structures enhanced their immunogenicity, it compromised the purity of the vaccines considerably, as VLP structures also integrated both baculovirus and Sf9 cell proteins. Elimination of these unwanted proteins from the vaccine required extensive disassembly and reassembly processing of purified VLPs, which is a constraint for the commercial scale manufacturing of vaccines annually. It also raises the cost and the time it takes to bring the vaccines to the market. The yield and the cost of various manufacturing processes and technologies are critical elements to ensure adequate supply of vaccine at an affordable cost, especially in a pandemic situation. This aspect of the vaccine manufacturing has been discussed exhaustively in a report published by the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) and is not covered here47.
Insect cell-derived rHA (RIV4) has been studied extensively by various groups in both pre-clinical models and humans. The rHA contained in RIV4 differs from that expressed in other systems in terms of specific structural features, the nature of the source material and the manufacturing process, which have an impact on certain aspects of vaccine safety and efficacy (Fig. 2). Based on these unique features, RIV4 received ‘product exclusivity’ protection from FDA, a ‘new active substance’ designation from EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)48 and an ‘innovative drug’ designation from Health Canada49. The use of this technology, together with the molecular characterisation of the product, should facilitate continued evolution of influenza vaccines with improved effectiveness and their timely availability to the public.
The tertiary structure of recombinant HA produced in insect cells can influence vaccine immunogenicity
Influenza HA is synthesised as a single precursor polypeptide (HA0), which is generally cleaved into two polypeptides (HA1 and HA2) extracellularly by trypsin-like serine proteases, furin and other subtilisin family endoproteases after newly synthesised virions are released from infected cells50,51. HA cleavage is essential for the infectivity of influenza virus. Thus, expression of these proteases exclusively in the respiratory tract is responsible for influenza virus tropism to epithelial cells of the upper and lower respiratory tract. However, HA from influenza subtypes H5 and H7 contains multi-basic cleavage sites that are cleaved by ubiquitously expressed furin in the trans-Golgi network, making these strains highly virulent50,52,53. The HA1 and HA2 polypeptides remain covalently linked by a disulfide bond to form heterodimers (Fig. 2). These molecules, either uncleaved HA0 or cleaved HA1–HA2 heterodimers, are expressed on the viral membrane surface as trimers (HA ‘rosettes’). The conversion of HA0 to HA1–HA2 heterodimers leads to conformational changes that render the molecule fusion-competent, thus enabling the virus to infect a new host cell52,54. In inactivated (split and subunit) vaccines, the HA molecules derived from live influenza viruses are present predominantly as HA1–HA2 heterodimers. By contrast, the rHA included in RIV4 is designed to yield predominantly as a single HA0 polypeptide (Fig. 2). A previous biochemical study (using SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions) clearly demonstrated the predominance of HA0 in recombinant HA H7 subunit complexes, produced using a BEVS, with no protein bands indicative of HA1 or HA2 molecules55. Poor processing of HA0 to HA1 and HA2 polypeptides in Sf9 cells has been shown to be due to insufficient levels of furin-like proteases in the cells56.
The conformational differences between pre-fusion and post-fusion states of HA and the process of exposure of the fusion peptide have been well described54. Webster et al.57 demonstrated, using monoclonal antibodies, that neutralising epitopes present in the pre-fusion HA0 molecule were lost upon conversion to the post-fusion HA1–HA2 heterodimer at an acidic pH57. Similarly, several broadly neutralising antibodies directed against the highly conserved HA stem region have been shown to block HA maturation and fusion58. Some of these antibodies are likely to bind near the uncleaved fusion peptide that protrudes at the surface of the HA0 rosettes. Turner et al.59 identified a monoclonal antibody that binds to an epitope on HA molecules that are partly and transiently exposed in the pre-fusion conformation59. Structural analysis of the antigen-antibody complex revealed a potential dynamic state where HA undergoes structural fluctuations in its pre-fusion state59. A recent study by Khurana et al.60 further demonstrated, using surface plasmon resonance technology, that the observed broader specificity of antibodies induced by RIV4 may be linked to the presence of unique epitopes on HA060. Additionally, several groups have isolated, using HA0 as the immunogen or from a phage display library, protective antibodies specific to epitopes in the fusion loop region present only in HA061,62. These antibodies exhibited unprecedented breadth and potency and neutralised a diverse panel of representative viruses in group 1 and group 2 influenza A, blocked protease cleavage of HA0 and locked HA in the pre-fusion state. Thus, these antibodies make the virus non-infectious by inhibiting the pH-induced conformation change and the HA-mediated membrane fusion that are essential for the virus infectivity. HA molecules presented on influenza virions are predominantly in the pre-fusion state. Once the virus binds to a cell or enters the acidic endosome of infected cells, the fusion loop is cleaved to yield HA1 and HA2, and the hydrophobic fusion peptide in the N-terminus of HA2 is sequestered away from membranes in a pocket, limiting its exposure52,63. Nonetheless, it would be of interest to examine the immunogenicity of released HA fusion peptides in the post-fusion state and their potential role in protection, as these are present in conventional influenza vaccines. Together, these critical findings clearly demonstrate structural differences between HA pre-fusion and post-fusion states, and the presence of unique neutralising epitopes in the pre-fusion HA0 molecules, which are present in RIV4 (Fig. 2).
Structural differences in the HA polypeptides and rosettes between recombinant and split vaccines have been shown to result in differences, both qualitative and quantitative, in the immune response to vaccines in humans and animals. Portnoff et al.64 demonstrated that recombinant HA antigens (specifically for the H3 strain) produced using BEVS (as used for RIV4), induced significantly higher levels of broadly cross-reactive antibodies against highly conserved regions of the HA head and stem domains than egg-derived split vaccines64. Recently Richards et al.65 examined CD4 T-cell and antibody responses in healthy adults who received egg-derived split vaccine, cell-derived split vaccine or RIV4 for three successive influenza seasons (2015–2016, 2016–2017, and 2017–2018)65. RIV4 elicited the most robust responses, with significantly higher T-cell and antibody levels than the other two vaccines. Authors postulated that simpler glycosylation of rHA and absence of other influenza viral proteins in RIV4 contributed to the observed robust immune response for RIV4 and emphasised the relevance of these features in determining vaccine efficacy and long-term immunity65.
The homogeneity of recombinant HA antigens in RIV4 may improve the safety profile over conventional influenza vaccines
As described above, HA is expressed on the viral surface as a HA trimer (rosette). When these are extracted from influenza viruses, they form clusters of varying sizes. This has been observed in conventional influenza virus-derived vaccines, with estimates of 18 to 1100 trimers per cluster55,66,67. Two distinct populations of cluster have been observed; the majority have an average diameter of 150 nm, while the remainder are larger (average diameter, 5500 nm)66. However, the rosette clusters in RIV4 are uniform in size and presentation, containing around six to eight HA trimers per cluster at an average diameter of approximately 30–40 nm55,67. The elution of rHA from RIV4 drug substance as a single peak in size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography is monitored for the release and the stability of RIV4.
Further characterisation by cryo-electron microscopy has revealed that the HA rosette clusters in RIV4 are uniformly starfish-shaped; whereas in the split vaccine they are mostly non-symmetrical and agglomerated into huge structures, resulting in both starfish- and peanut-shaped heterogeneous particles55. Additional electron microscopy analysis of split vaccine clusters showed a highly heterogeneous mixture containing different types of viral particles containing HA and NA as well as split viral membrane folded in various shapes, slightly disrupted virions, and whole virions66.
In Canada between 2000 and 2004, an unusual number of cases of a syndrome termed as oculo-respiratory syndrome (ORS) were reported following immunisation with the inactivated influenza split-virus vaccine68. Detailed analysis revealed that ORS, induced within 2 to 24 h of vaccination, was suspected to be due to the presence of micro-aggregates of unsplit virions in the conventional egg-derived influenza vaccines69. High levels of aggregate content in the split vaccine are believed to have induced a Type-2 polarised immune response resulting in ORS based on study results from a mouse model70. Although extremely rare, this is unlikely to occur with RIV4 that contains HA rosettes of small and uniform size.
The N-linked glycan structure of recombinant HA produced in insect cells differs significantly from HA in other influenza vaccines
Influenza HA has a variable number of N-linked glycosylation sites (depending on the virus strain and subtype) in the globular head region and the conserved stem region71. The glycosylation of HA has various functions, including regulation of the virus life-cycle and a role in disease pathogenesis71. During vaccine manufacture, the host cells used for the production of HA play a major role in determining HA N-glycan composition72,73. Glycoproteins expressed in mammalian cells typically have sialylated complex-type N-linked glycans, while those expressed in insect cells typically have simple unsialylated glycans (either truncated, paucimannosidic or oligomannosidic glycans)74. An et al.72 showed that egg-derived and mammalian (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cell-derived HA predominantly contained highly-branched complex or high-mannose glycans, whereas HA expressed in Sf9 insect cells had relatively small paucimannose glycans (Fig. 2)72.
The peptide sequences around glycosylation sites are highly conserved and, as such, antibodies directed against these regions could provide broader specificity. Antisera raised against simple monoglycosylated HA in mice were shown to improve the breadth and capacity of HA-neutralising antibodies to protect against lethal challenge with H5N1 compared to antisera raised against fully glycosylated HA75. Thus, elimination of parts of glycans that are not essential for HA structure may improve vaccine-induced protection. Subsequent studies showed that HA with simpler glycans induce more broadly protective antibodies with superior cross-clade protection compared to HA with more complex glycans76,77,78,79. The presence of simpler glycans appears to be equally efficient to that of chicken or mammalian cell-derived glycosylation in ensuring the proper folding of HA, and exposes conserved regions of the molecule for the induction of immunity with broader protection12,71,76,77,78,79,80.
In a study by Nachbagauer et al.78, RIV4 induced HA stem-specific neutralising antibodies directed against influenza subtypes H1, H3 and B haemagglutinin in an age-dependent manner in humans, with the highest titres observed in the elderly78. RIV4 also induces antibodies, in both humans and mice, that are specific to epitopes in the HA head region, at greater proportions than a traditional mammalian cell-derived subunit vaccine (Flucelvax® [Trivalent])77. Higher magnitudes of haemagglutination inhibitory antibody response against HA1 have also been observed with RIV4 compared to egg- or mammalian cell-derived split vaccines (Flucelvax® Tetra, Seqirus, and Fluzone® quadrivalent SD, Sanofi Pasteur)60. These data warrant additional studies to verify whether rHA elicits a broader antibody repertoire than conventional vaccines and whether this underlies the cross-protection against antigenic drift variants previously observed in clinical trials12,81.
RIV4 has a unique ability to induce broadly cross-reactive antibody responses to antigenically drifted A/H3N2 viruses in humans. In a small study by Belongia et al.82, participants aged 65–74 years were immunised with RIV4, a high-dose split-virion inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone® High Dose, Sanofi Pasteur; HD-IIV3) or adjuvanted-IIV3 (aIIV3)82. Participant sera were tested against four A/H3N2 viruses including a cell-propagated reference vaccine strain, two circulating viruses and an antigenically advanced virus with evidence of antigenic drift. The post-vaccination geometric mean fold rise against the two circulating viruses was twice as high for RIV4 as for HD-IIV3 or aIIV3. Post-vaccination titre against the antigenically drifted H3N2 were generally low and similar across all groups, however, receipt of RIV4 was strongly associated with seroconversion to this strain (p = 0.003). The investigators suggested that although the circulating A/H3N2 viruses were antigenically similar to the cell-grown vaccine reference virus, egg propagation of the vaccine strains had led to loss of a glycosylation site and impaired antibody response to circulating viruses, consistent with previous reports26.
In addition to the above referenced studies, in a recent study by Shinde et al.83 baculovirus-expressed rHA generated cross-protective responses against both circulating and drifted A/H3N2 strains, including in older adults who are at a higher risk for influenza and associated medical complications83,84. This unique characteristic of the recombinant vaccine is likely related to glycosylation of rHA in the insect cell line, leaving it uncleaved. The higher quantity and greater accessibility of the genetically conserved stem region of rHA produced in insect cells (resulting in smaller N-linked glycans) may contribute to cross-protection against mismatched influenza strains12,75. The study by Nachbagaeur et al.78 supports the hypothesis that a recombinant vaccine results in increased titre of broadly neutralising HA stem-reactive antibodies and that these immune responses increase with age78. This increase with age is possibly due to repeated exposure to divergent influenza viruses similar to the multiple A/H3N2 virus strains evaluated by Belongia et al.82. Therefore, vaccine constructs that preserve the highly conserved HA stem can protect against drifted viruses and thus may confer a greater breadth of protection against influenza.
Recombinant HA antigens are not subjected to chemical modifications
In all conventional influenza vaccines, whether derived from eggs or mammalian cells, the antigens are exposed to inactivation agents such as formaldehyde or β-propiolactone (BPL). These inactivating agents cause numerous modifications to the antigenic epitopes on HA through cross-linking or formation of bis-alkylated groups85,86,87. These modifications often result in changes to protein folding, conformation, and stability88. Unlike conventional vaccines, RIV4 does not go through an inactivation step, thus preserving the native HA conformation of the wild-type virus, required for optimal protective immune response.
Absence of egg or other influenza viral components in recombinant HA vaccine is likely to favour its safety profile
As most split and subunit vaccines are prepared from influenza viruses that are grown in embryonated chicken eggs, they contain egg proteins. Testing of 58 vaccine lots covering six different seasonal influenza vaccines produced by five different manufacturers showed that the median ovalbumin concentration was 350 ng/mL89. Moreover, another study of commercial influenza vaccine preparations detected other viral proteins such as nucleoprotein and matrix protein (confirmed by a chromatographic separation) that are not shown to be relevant for vaccine effectiveness, and viral RNA fragments (confirmed by activity assay)90,91. Such egg-derived or other influenza virus-derived proteins (as described above) and influenza viral RNA fragments are not present in recombinant vaccines.
Although uncommon, some individuals may be at increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions to component proteins such as ovalbumin and those who are sensitised may be at higher risk of clinical manifestations of allergic disease upon exposure92. Egg protein, viral RNA, and process impurities such as inactivating agents or hydrocortisone that are typically present in conventional vaccines are absent in RIV4 would eliminate potential adverse reactions, although rare, to these components in vulnerable individuals93.
Conclusions
The evidence reviewed here demonstrates several advantages of the BEVS used in the manufacture of RIV4 over conventional influenza vaccines that rely on influenza virions propagated in egg or mammalian cells, split with detergents with or without further HA enrichment. The use of recombinant protein technology eliminates the risk of antigenic mismatch due to potential changes in primary HA structure through egg- or cell-adaptation. We also describe features of the rHA tertiary structure that are likely to be responsible for the generation of broad cross-reactive and protective antibodies, together with the direct or indirect evidence supporting this. The homogeneity of rHA rosettes and negligible process-related impurities are the hallmarks of RIV4. As rHA production bypasses the need for a viral inactivation step and avoids the use of eggs, related process-impurities such as inactivating agents or residual egg-protein, and thus potential adverse reactions to these impurities in vulnerable individuals are eliminated. This well-established and validated platform for vaccine manufacture could be extended to address other emerging infectious diseases where cross-protection against constantly evolving variants is critical, such as pandemic influenza and/or COVID-19.
Data availability
No data were generated for the review article.
References
Iuliano, A. D. et al. Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: a modelling study. Lancet 391, 1285–1300 (2018).
World Health Organization. Fact-sheet. Influenza (Seasonal). Available at https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/influenza-(seasonal). Accessed 12 March 2021. (2018).
Lafond, K. E. et al. Global burden of influenza-associated lower respiratory tract infections and hospitalizations among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 18, e1003550 (2021).
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm. Accessed 16 March 2021.
Sellers, S. A., Hagan, R. S., Hayden, F. G. & Fischer, W. A. II The hidden burden of influenza: a review of the extra-pulmonary complications of influenza infection. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 11, 372–393 (2017).
de Francisco Shapovalova, N., Donadel, M., Jit, M. & Hutubessy, R. A systematic review of the social and economic burden of influenza in low- and middle-income countries. Vaccine 33, 6537–6544 (2015).
Szucs, T. The socio-economic burden of influenza. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44 Suppl B, 11–15 (1999).
Krammer, F. et al. Influenza. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 3 (2018).
Paules, C. & Subbarao, K. Influenza. Lancet 390, 697–708 (2017).
Hobson, D., Curry, R. L., Beare, A. S. & Ward-Gardner, A. The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses. Epidemiol. Infect. 70, 767–777 (1972).
Ohmit, S. E. et al. Influenza hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer as a correlate of vaccine-induced protection. J. Infect. Dis. 204, 1879–1885 (2011).
Dunkle, L. M. et al. Efficacy of recombinant influenza vaccine in adults 50 years of age or older. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2427–2436 (2017).
Wohlbold, T. J. & Krammer, F. In the shadow of hemagglutinin: a growing interest in influenza viral neuraminidase and its role as a vaccine antigen. Viruses 6, 2465–2494 (2014).
Giurgea, L. T., Morens, D. M., Taubenberger, J. K. & Memoli, M. J. Influenza neuraminidase: a neglected protein and its potential for a better influenza vaccine. Vaccines 8, 409 (2020).
World Health Organization. Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS). Available at https://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/en/. Accessed 17 February 2021. (2021).
Camilloni, B., Neri, M., Lepri, E. & Iorio, A. M. Cross-reactive antibodies in middle-aged and elderly volunteers after MF59-adjuvanted subunit trivalent influenza vaccine against B viruses of the B/Victoria or B/Yamagata lineages. Vaccine 27, 4099–4103 (2009).
Tricco, A. C. et al. Comparing influenza vaccine efficacy against mismatched and matched strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 11, 153 (2013).
Raymond, D. D. et al. Conserved epitope on influenza-virus hemagglutinin head defined by a vaccine-induced antibody. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 168–173 (2018).
Sautto, G. A., Kirchenbaum, G. A. & Ross, T. M. Towards a universal influenza vaccine: different approaches for one goal. Virol. J. 15, 17 (2018).
Nachbagauer, R. et al. A chimeric hemagglutinin-based universal influenza virus vaccine approach induces broad and long-lasting immunity in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase I trial. Nat. Med. 27, 106–114 (2021).
Orenstein, W. A. & Schaffner, W. Lessons learned: role of influenza vaccine production, distribution, supply, and demand–what it means for the provider. Am. J. Med. 121, S22–S27 (2008).
Felberbaum, R. S. The baculovirus expression vector system: a commercial manufacturing platform for viral vaccines and gene therapy vectors. Biotechnol. J. 10, 702–714 (2015).
Cox, M. M. & Hashimoto, Y. A fast track influenza virus vaccine produced in insect cells. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 107, S31–S41 (2011).
Raymond, D. D. et al. Influenza immunization elicits antibodies specific for an egg-adapted vaccine strain. Nat. Med. 22, 1465–1469 (2016).
Skowronski, D. M. et al. Low 2012-13 influenza vaccine effectiveness associated with mutation in the egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain not antigenic drift in circulating viruses. PLoS ONE 9, e92153 (2014).
Zost, S. J. et al. Contemporary H3N2 influenza viruses have a glycosylation site that alters binding of antibodies elicited by egg-adapted vaccine strains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12578–12583 (2017).
Flannery, B. et al. Interim estimates of 2016-17 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, February 2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 66, 167–171 (2017).
Shu, Y. & McCauley, J. GISAID: Global initiative on sharing all influenza data - from vision to reality. Euro surveillance: bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin 22, https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2017.22.13.30494 (2017).
Song, L. et al. Efficacious recombinant influenza vaccines produced by high yield bacterial expression: a solution to global pandemic and seasonal needs. PLoS ONE 3, e2257 (2008).
Tussey, L. et al. Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity study of a quadrivalent seasonal flu vaccine comprising recombinant hemagglutinin-flagellin fusion proteins. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 3, ofw015 (2016).
Aguilar-Yanez, J. M. et al. An influenza A/H1N1/2009 hemagglutinin vaccine produced in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 5, e11694 (2010).
Saczynska, V. Influenza virus hemagglutinin as a vaccine antigen produced in bacteria. Acta Biochim Pol. 61, 561–572 (2014).
Davis, A. R. et al. Immune response to human influenza virus hemagglutinin expressed in Escherichia coli. Gene 21, 273–284 (1983).
Rosales-Mendoza, S. et al. What does plant-based vaccine technology offer to the fight against COVID-19? Vaccines 8, 183 (2020).
Pillet, S. et al. A plant-derived quadrivalent virus like particle influenza vaccine induces cross-reactive antibody and T cell response in healthy adults. Clin. Immunol. 168, 72–87 (2016).
Pillet, S. et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent plant-derived virus like particle influenza vaccine candidate-two randomized Phase II clinical trials in 18 to 49 and >/=50 years old adults. PLoS ONE 14, e0216533 (2019).
Ward, B. J. et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18-64 years) and older adults (>/=65 years): two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials. Lancet 396, 1491–1503 (2020).
Won, S. Y. et al. Characterization of the innate stimulatory capacity of plant-derived virus-like particles bearing influenza hemagglutinin. Vaccine 36, 8028–8038 (2018).
Pandey, A. et al. Impact of preexisting adenovirus vector immunity on immunogenicity and protection conferred with an adenovirus-based H5N1 influenza vaccine. PLoS ONE 7, e33428–e33428 (2012).
Sayedahmed, E. E. et al. Adenoviral vector-based vaccine platforms for developing the next generation of influenza vaccines. Vaccines 8, 574 (2020).
Xiang, K. et al. Progress on adenovirus-vectored universal influenza vaccines. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 11, 1209–1222 (2015).
Chen, J. R. et al. Better influenza vaccines: an industry perspective. J. Biomed. Sci. 27, 33 (2020).
Report to the president on reengeneering the influenza vaccine production enterprise to meet the challenges of pandemic influenza. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST-Influenza-Vaccinology-Report.pdf. Accessed August 2021.
López-Macías, C. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a virus-like particle pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine in a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adults in Mexico. Vaccine 29, 7826–7834 (2011).
Pincus, S. et al. Release and stability testing programs for a novel virus-like particle vaccine. Biopharm. Int 23 Suppl 10, 26–34 (2010).
Fernandes, F. et al. Insect cells as a production platform of complex virus-like particles. Expert Rev. Vaccines 12, 225–236 (2013).
Influenza vaccine strategies for broad global access. Available at https://path.azureedge.net/media/documents/VAC_infl_publ_rpt_10-07.pdf. Accessed August 2021.
European Medicines Agency. Assessment report. Supemtek. Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005159/0000. Available at https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/supemtek-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2021.
Health Canada. Register of Innovative Drugs [Updated 15 April 2021]. Available from https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/register-innovative-drugs.html. Accessed 19 April 2021.
Taubenberger, J. K. Influenza virus hemagglutinin cleavage into HA1, HA2: no laughing matter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9713–9715 (1998).
Stieneke-Gröber, A. et al. Influenza virus hemagglutinin with multibasic cleavage site is activated by furin, a subtilisin-like endoprotease. EMBO J. 11, 2407–2414 (1992). PMC556715.
Chen, J. et al. Structure of the hemagglutinin precursor cleavage site, a determinant of influenza pathogenicity and the origin of the labile conformation. Cell 95, 409–417 (1998).
Luczo, J. M. et al. Molecular pathogenesis of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza: the role of the haemagglutinin cleavage site motif. Rev. Med Virol. 25, 406–430 (2015).
Boonstra, S. et al. Hemagglutinin-mediated membrane fusion: a biophysical perspective. Annu Rev. Biophys. 47, 153–173 (2018).
McCraw, D. M., Gallagher, J. R. & Harris, A. K. Characterization of influenza vaccine hemagglutinin complexes by cryo-electron microscopy and image analyses reveals structural polymorphisms. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 23, 483–495 (2016).
Kost, T. A. & Condreay, J. P. Recombinant baculoviruses as expression vectors for insect and mammalian cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 428–433 (1999).
Webster, R. G., Brown, L. E. & Jackson, D. C. Changes in the antigenicity of the hemagglutinin molecule of H3 influenza virus at acidic pH. Virology 126, 587–599 (1983).
Lee, P. S. & Wilson, I. A. Structural characterization of viral epitopes recognized by broadly cross-reactive antibodies. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 386, 323–341 (2015).
Turner, H. L. et al. Potent anti-influenza H7 human monoclonal antibody induces separation of hemagglutinin receptor-binding head domains. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000139 (2019).
Khurana, S. et al. Repeat vaccination reduces antibody affinity maturation across different influenza vaccine platforms in humans. Nat. Commun. 10, 3338 (2019).
Ekiert, D. C. et al. Antibody recognition of a highly conserved influenza virus epitope. Science 324, 246–251 (2009).
Kallewaard, N. L. et al. Structure and function analysis of an antibody recognizing all influenza A subtypes. Cell 166, 596–608 (2016).
Benhaim, M. A. et al. Structural monitoring of a transient intermediate in the hemagglutinin fusion machinery on influenza virions. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8822 (2020).
Portnoff, A. D. et al. Influenza hemagglutinin nanoparticle vaccine elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies against structurally distinct domains of H3N2 HA. Vaccines 8, 99 (2020).
Richards, K. A. et al. Recombinant HA-based vaccine outperforms split and subunit vaccines in elicitation of influenza-specific CD4 T cells and CD4 T cell-dependent antibody responses in humans. NPJ Vaccines 5, 77 (2020).
Tay, T. et al. Investigation into alternative testing methodologies for characterization of influenza virus vaccine. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 11, 1673–1684 (2015).
Gallagher, J. R. et al. Characterization of hemagglutinin antigens on influenza virus and within vaccines using electron microscopy. Vaccines https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6020031 (2018).
Public Health Agency of Canada. Oculo-respiratory syndrome following influenza vaccination: review of post-marketing surveillance through four influenza seasons in Canada. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 31, 217–225 (2005).
Choudhri, Y. & Walop, W. Influenza vaccine-associated adverse events: results of passive surveillance, Canada 2001-2002. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 28, 189–196 (2002).
Babiuk, S. et al. Aggregate content influences the Th1/Th2 immune response to influenza vaccine: evidence from a mouse model. J. Med. Virol. 72, 138–142 (2004).
Wei, C. J. et al. Cross-neutralization of 1918 and 2009 influenza viruses: role of glycans in viral evolution and vaccine design. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 24ra21 (2010).
An, Y. et al. N-glycosylation of seasonal influenza vaccine hemagglutinins: implication for potency testing and immune processing. J Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01693-18 (2019).
Schwarzer, J. et al. Glycan analysis in cell culture-based influenza vaccine production: influence of host cell line and virus strain on the glycosylation pattern of viral hemagglutinin. Vaccine 27, 4325–4336 (2009).
Chung, C. Y. et al. SnapShot: N-glycosylation processing pathways across kingdoms. Cell 171, 258–258.e251 (2017).
Wang, C. C. et al. Glycans on influenza hemagglutinin affect receptor binding and immune response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18137–18142 (2009).
Chen, J. R. et al. Vaccination of monoglycosylated hemagglutinin induces cross-strain protection against influenza virus infections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2476–2481 (2014).
Henry, C. et al. Monoclonal antibody responses after recombinant hemagglutinin vaccine versus subunit inactivated influenza virus vaccine: a comparative study. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01150-19 (2019).
Nachbagauer, R. et al. Age dependence and isotype specificity of influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-reactive antibodies in humans. mBio 7, e01996–01915 (2016).
Reichert, T. et al. Does glycosylation as a modifier of original antigenic sin explain the case age distribution and unusual toxicity in pandemic novel H1N1 influenza? BMC Infect. Dis. 10, 5 (2010).
Wang, K. et al. Expression and purification of an influenza hemagglutinin–one step closer to a recombinant protein-based influenza vaccine. Vaccine 24, 2176–2185 (2006).
Treanor, J. J. et al. Protective efficacy of a trivalent recombinant hemagglutinin protein vaccine (FluBlok(R)) against influenza in healthy adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine 29, 7733–7739 (2011).
Belongia, E. A. et al. Clinical trial to assess immunogenicity of high-dose, adjuvanted, and recombinant influenza vaccines against cell-grown A(H3N2) viruses in adults 65 to 74 years, 2017-2018. Vaccine 38, 3121–3128 (2020).
Shinde, V. et al. Induction of cross-reactive hemagglutination inhibiting antibody and polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell responses by a recombinant matrix-M-adjuvanted hemagglutinin nanoparticle influenza vaccine. Clin. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1673 (2020).
Centers for Disease Control Prevention. Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza — United States, 1976-2007. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 59, 1057–1062 (2010).
Goldstein, M. A. & Tauraso, N. M. Effect of formalin, beta-propiolactone, merthiolate, and ultraviolet light upon influenza virus infectivity chicken cell agglutination, hemagglutination, and antigenicity. Appl. Microbiol. 19, 290–294 (1970).
Uittenbogaard, J. P., Zomer, B., Hoogerhout, P. & Metz, B. Reactions of beta-propiolactone with nucleobase analogues, nucleosides, and peptides: implications for the inactivation of viruses. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 36198–36214 (2011).
She, Y. M. et al. Surface modifications of influenza proteins upon virus inactivation by β-propiolactone. Proteomics 13, 3537–3547 (2013).
Herrera-Rodriguez, J. et al. Inactivated or damaged? Comparing the effect of inactivation methods on influenza virions to optimize. Vaccin. Prod. Vaccin. 37, 1630–1637 (2019).
Li, J. T., Rank, M. A., Squillace, D. L. & Kita, H. Ovalbumin content of influenza vaccines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, 1412–1413 (2010). author reply 1413-1414.
Garcia-Canas, V. et al. Selective and quantitative detection of influenza virus proteins in commercial vaccines using two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 79, 3164–3172 (2007).
Garcia-Canas, V., Lorbetskie, B. & Girard, M. Rapid and selective characterization of influenza virus constituents in monovalent and multivalent preparations using non-porous reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography columns. J. Chromatogr. A 1123, 225–232 (2006).
Lin, Y. T. et al. Correlation of ovalbumin of egg white components with allergic diseases in children. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 49, 112–118 (2016).
Vaccine excipient summary. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf. Accessed August 2021.
Acknowledgements
Editorial assistance with the preparation of the manuscript was provided by Juliette Gray, inScience Communications, Springer Healthcare Ltd, UK and was funded by Sanofi Pasteur. Graphic design support provided by Naveen Kandibanda (Sanofi). The authors also thank Kathryn Bonaparte (Sanofi Pasteur) for editorial assistance and manuscript coordination.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.A. conceptualised, designed, and prepared the original draft and Fig. 2; D.R. and P.P expanded the clinical and the regulatory sections respectively; all authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript at all stages, approved the final draft, and remain accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
All authors are employees of Sanofi Pasteur and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Arunachalam, A.B., Post, P. & Rudin, D. Unique features of a recombinant haemagglutinin influenza vaccine that influence vaccine performance. npj Vaccines 6, 144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00403-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00403-7
- Springer Nature Limited