Abstract
There is an unmet need for antigen delivery systems that elicit efficient T cell priming to prevent infectious diseases or for treatment of cancers. Here, we explored the immunogenic potential of biologically assembled biopolymer particles (BPs) that have been bioengineered to display the antigenic MHC I and MHC II epitopes of model antigen ovalbumin (OVA). Purified dendritic cells (DCs) captured BP-OVA and presented the associated antigenic epitopes to CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. Vaccination with BP-OVA in the absence of adjuvant elicited antigen presentation to OVA-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and cross-primed effective cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) killers. BP-OVA induction of CTL killing did not require CD4+ T cell help, with active CTLs generated in BP-OVA vaccinated I-Ab−/− and CD40−/− mice. In contrast, IL-15 and type I IFN were required, with abrogated CTL activity in vaccinated IL-15−/− and IFNAR1−/− mice. cDC1 and/or CD103+ DCs were not essential for BP-OVA specific CTL with immunization eliciting responses in Batf3−/− mice. Poly I:C, but not LPS or CpG, co-administered as an adjuvant with BP-OVA boosted CTL responses. Finally, vaccination with BP-OVA protected against B16-OVA melanoma and Eμ-myc-GFP-OVA lymphoma inoculation. In summary, we have demonstrated that epitope-displaying BPs represent an antigen delivery platform exhibiting a unique mechanism to effectively engage T cell immune responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Advances in the design of safe and effective vaccine delivery systems is of critical importance. Bacterially assembled biopolymer particles (BPs) bioengineered to display pathogen-specific antigens were shown in preclinical studies to perform as safe and efficient vaccines1,2,3,4. BPs are composed of the biopolyester, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) that has Federal Drug Administration, USA-approved uses including for sutures, implants and tissue engineering4,5. PHB inclusions are naturally produced by bacteria and archaea as an energy storage material1 and are polydisperse with a size range of 200 to 500 nm in diameter2. BPs can be isolated from bacterial cells and are structurally stable, biocompatible and biodegradable. An attractive property of BPs is their capacity to be bioengineered to display functional proteins and epitopes of interest1,6. This is achieved by exploiting the PHB synthesizing enzyme, which mediates BP formation, to anchor translationally fused antigens or epitopes to the surface1. Thus, antigens are biologically conjugated to BPs during their assembly by the bacterial production host. BP prototypes displaying antigens or epitopes of interest can be developed within weeks and subjected to a scalable industrial production process4. These features lend BPs many attributes that position them as ideal antigen carrier systems.
Successful immunogenicity is evident when BPs engineered to display pathogen-associated antigens are administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly. BPs displaying individual or multiple Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens provoked inflammatory cytokine production and antibody responses that correlated with protective immunity7,8,9. When displayed by BPs, Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen PsaA10 and N. meningitidis antigen NadA11 induce strong antibody responses. Display of epitopes derived from SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or Plasmodium falciparum induced T cell immunity in respective animal models12,13. While these examples highlight the potential of BPs as vaccines, the parameters of how BPs elicit T cell immunity are yet to be investigated and their utility in tumour immunity unexplored. Here, we have undertaken an in-depth examination of the immunogenic functions of BPs. We show BPs are capable of mediating MHC I and MHC II antigen presentation, T cell priming and tumour regression in mouse models of cancer immunotherapy.
Results
Design and production of OVA-peptide coated BPs
BPs displaying multiple repeats of peptides derived from the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA) were synthesized. This was performed by engineering self-assembly of BPs in ClearColiTM, a mutant strain of Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) incapable of producing endotoxic lipopolysaccharides (Fig. 1A). Self-assembly of BPs involved genetic engineering of ClearColiTM to enable biosynthesis of PHB precursors and the formation of OVA-peptide coated BP14 (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Using this method, synthesis and peptide functionalization of BPs was integrated in a single step in microbial cell factories with the capacity for manufacture to be easily scaled up. To display OVA on BPs, three repeats of OVA257-264 (MHC I specific epitope) and OVA323-332 (MHC II specific epitope) peptides were fused to the N terminus of PHB synthase (PhbC), the PHB anchoring protein. T cell epitopes were repeated to promote effective antigen presentation and T cell responses. The N-terminus fusion point of PhbC was selected due to its highly variable surface-exposed region which is not critical for PhbC activity15. This fusion point is also expected to prevent unfavorable interactions between the OVA peptide domains and PHB or PhbC, while allowing unconstrained access of the peptides for antigen processing. Protein profiles of the BPs after processing indicated BP purity when compared to whole cells harbouring BPs and showed the presence of the fusion proteins of PHB anchor and OVA-peptides corresponding with the expected molecular weight, larger than that of only the PHB anchor or the empty control BPs (Fig. 1B). Sequences of the fusion proteins were confirmed through peptide fingerprinting analyses combined with mass spectrometry (Supplementary Table 3), suggesting successful production of BPs densely displaying the respective OVA peptides. It should be noted that the doublet in the OVA peptide-coated BP sample evident in the gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1B) was confirmed to comprise the same amino acid sequence (Supplementary Table 3). Further compositional analyses of the BPs after acid-digestion of PHB into crotonic acid confirmed the presence of PHB (Supplementary Table 3). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed inclusions of BPs in whole cells, resulting in different aspect ratios of width and length (Fig. 1C, left panel), as well as the purified BPs (Fig. 1C, right panel). Although BPs showed a size of 100-200 nm in TEM, their hydrodynamic diameters in suspensions were approximately 800–900 nm when determined by dynamic light scattering (Fig. 1D). This suggested aggregation in suspension. The BPs showed negative zeta potentials. Overall, this process generated BPs densely coated with OVA peptides referred to throughout the manuscript as BP-OVA.
BPs are weakly immunogenic
First, the ability of BPs to elicit inflammatory responses following administration in vivo was determined. Mice were injected subcutaneously with 5 mg of BPs that did not display any fusion proteins. Examination of immune cells in the subcutaneous inguinal lymph node (ILN) 16 h after immunisation showed the overall proportion and numbers of innate and adaptive immune cells (for gating strategy refer to Supplementary Fig. 1), including DCs, neutrophils, NK cells, eosinophils, monocytes and macrophages, were unaltered compared to unvaccinated mice (Fig. 2A). While BP immunization did not perturb the cellular composition of the lymph node, immunisation elicited a temporary increase in serum TNF-α, MCP-1, and IL-6 at 16 hours post injection, with responses returning to basal levels after 48 hours (Fig. 2B). IL-10, IL-12p70 or IFNγ was not detected (data not shown). BPs directly incubated with primary DCs isolated from murine spleens induced small amounts of TNF-α and IL-10, but not IFNγ, MCP-1, IL-12p70 or IL-6. The pattern of cytokines elicited by BPs differed to that following stimulation with either synthetic unmethylated CpG oligonucleotides (CpG) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Fig. 2C). Finally, BPs caused a small, but detectable increase in MuTuDC surface expression of costimulatory molecule CD86, while MHC II was unchanged when compared with MuTuDCs stimulated with CpG (Fig. 2D).
DCs present antigen displayed by BPs to CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in vitro
To elucidate if primary DCs are capable of presenting antigen attached to BPs, in vitro antigen presentation assays with BP-OVA were performed. Primary DCs were purified from the spleen of C57BL/6 mice and assays performed with unstimulated DCs or DCs activated following overnight stimulation with TLR9 agonist, CpG. Both resting and activated cDC1 and cDC2 were capable of acquiring BPs, particularly when activated (Fig. 3). To test the capacity of DCs to process and present BP associated antigen, we examined their ability to present 100 μg BP-OVA. 100 μg refers to the mass of the BPs, which in this experiment equated to approximately 300 ng OVA antigen. 100 μg OVA protein either alone or in the presence of CpG were used as positive controls and 100 μg BPs (empty beads) were included as a negative control. OT-I, CD8+ T cells specific for H-2Kb-OVA257-264 and OT-II, CD4+ T cells specific for IAb-OVA323-332 were purified and labelled with Cell Trace Violet (CTV) for analysis of antigen-specific T cell proliferation by flow cytometry. BP-OVA caused proliferation of OT-I cells, albeit at reduced division rates compared to OVA protein controls (Fig. 4A). BP-OVA also promoted OT-II cell proliferation, similar to OVA protein controls (Fig. 4B). As expected, empty BPs without antigen did not elicit OT-I or OT-II cell division (Fig. 4B). This confirmed that both unstimulated and activated DCs could acquire antigen attached to BPs and were capable of processing it for presentation via both MHC I and MHC II antigen presentation pathways.
Subcutaneous vaccination with BP-OVA induces CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in vivo
Next, antigen-specific immunity to BP-OVA was tested in vivo. Mice were immunized subcutaneously with 5 mg BP-OVA. Twenty four hours later mice were adoptively transferred with Cell Trace Violet labelled OT-I and OT-II cells. Responses were examined in the ILN that drains the skin, and the spleen, 36 h later (gating strategy in Supplementary Fig. 2A). Following subcutaneous vaccination, both OT-I (Fig. 5A) and OT-II (Fig. 5B) cell division was detected in the ILN and spleen in response to BP-OVA, but not BP without antigen.
To assess the kinetics of the T cell response to BP-OVA, mice were transferred with low numbers of OT-I and OT-II cells, immunised subcutaneously and T cell numbers and phenotypes examined after vaccination in the spleen and ILN up to 13 and 21 days, respectively, (gating strategy in Supplementary Fig. 2B). Both OT-I and OT-II responses were undetectable in either the spleen or ILN prior to day three. At both sites, expanded numbers of OT-I and OT-II T cells peaked at days five to seven before declining to very low numbers from day 13 (Fig. 6A, B). Expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), a marker of T cell activation, by OT-I and OT-II T cells in spleen was detected as early as day three post immunisation and waned by day 13. To measure effector T cell activity, spleen and ILN cells were isolated and restimulated in vitro with OVA257-264 peptide in the presence of Golgi Plug to block cytokine egress. Intracellular IFNγ staining showed that in response to BP-OVA, OT-I cells in the spleen and ILN generate IFNγ and maintain high levels of IFNγ production even when T cell numbers decline. In conclusion, BP-OVA elicited robust CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses in vivo.
BP-OVA vaccination elicits cytotoxic T lymphocyte killing in vivo
The ability of vaccination with BP-OVA to elicit cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) immunity was examined. Responses were tested following subcutaneous administration of 5 mg BP-OVA containing OVA257-264 and OVA323-332 or 5 mg BP-OVA257-264 containing the OVA257-264 peptide alone. CTL activity was measured by transfer of CTV-labelled target cells pulsed or not, with the OVA254-267 peptide. Both BP-OVA and BP-OVA257-264 elicited approximately 20–30% killing activity against OVA257-264-pulsed target cells. Therefore, antigens displayed on BPs could elicit CTL killing, even in the absence of an antigen-specific MHC II peptide epitope. A contribution for CD4+ T helper cells, which for many vaccines is critical for effective CTL generation16 was examined using mice with MHC II I-Ab deletion17, lacking CD4+ T cells, and CD40−/− mice deficient in CD40-CD40L signalling critical for CD4+ T cell help18,19. An anti-OVA CTL response was generated independent of CD4+ helper T cells or CD40 signalling. The increase in CTL killing in I-Ab−/− mice can be explained by the expanded numbers of CD8+ T cells in these mice17 (Fig. 7A). In response to both BP-OVA CTL killing was detected in spleen and BP-OVA also elicited an antigen-specific CTL response that was detectable in ILN with similar killing to that observed in the spleen (Supplementary Fig. 3). A role for IL-15, required for CD8+ T cell differentiation20, was examined using IL-15−/− mice21 and indeed a role for IL-15 was important for CTL killing in response to BP-OVA. In addtion, the role of cDC1, the major cDC subset responsible for cross-presentation and anti-tumour immunity in mice22 in CTL killing in response to BP-OVA was determined. This was achieved using Batf3−/− mice that lack Batf3, a transcription factor crucial for CD8+ and CD103+ cDC1 development22. In the absence of Batf3, CTL responses were reduced, but still detectable suggesting that cDC1, participate in, but are not critical for, CTL killing in response to BP-OVA (Fig. 7B). Next, we aimed to boost CTL killing in response to BP-OVA. To do this, we vaccinated mice with BP-OVA alone or in combination with the synthetic toll like receptor agonists CpG, LPS or polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly I:C). Inclusion of LPS or CpG did not further enhance the CTL response to BP-OVA. In contrast, inclusion of poly I:C significantly increased CTL activity in response to BP-OVA in the spleen and ILN (Fig. 7C and Supplementary Fig. 3) by 2.7 and 2.8-fold, respectively. Poly I:C mimics the presence of double stranded RNA and stimulates type I interferon (IFN) production. Therefore, we hypothesised type I IFN enhances CTL killing in response to BP-OVA. To investigate this, CTL killing was investigated in IFNAR1−/− mice where the type I IFN receptor is absent and cells are incapable of signalling type I IFN-dependent immune responses23. In the absence of IFNAR1, BP-OVA, in the presence of poly I:C, failed to generate CTL killers, suggesting that T cell responses to BP-OVA are indeed amplified by type I IFN (Fig. 7D).
BP-OVA vaccination elicits anti-tumour immunity
The utility of BP-OVA as a vaccine for anti-tumour immunity was measured in two mouse models of tumour immunotherapy, melanoma and B cell lymphoma. B16-OVA cells are B16F10 melanoma cells that express membrane-bound OVA24. B16-OVA cells are inoculated intravenously with tumours developing in lungs. C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated subcutaneously with BP-OVA seven days prior to tumour inoculation. Lungs were harvested after 18 days and tumour nodules examined. BP-OVA successfully induced an anti-tumour response against intravenous B16-OVA with significantly lower numbers and percentages of tumour nodules in the lungs compared to BPs without OVA antigen or unvaccinated mice (Fig. 8A). Next, anti-tumour immunity elicited by BP-OVA was examined in an Eμ-myc B cell lymphoma model. Eμ-myc-GFP-OVA are Eμ-myc cells engineered to express OVA and GFP (for detection by flow cytometry). The lymphoma cells are inoculated intravenously and home to the spleen. C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated subcutaneously with BP-OVA four days prior to inoculation of Eμ-myc-GFP-OVA lymphoma. Spleens were harvested four or five days after tumour inoculation for analysis by flow cytometry. A significant decrease in lymphoma burden was detected in BP-OVA vaccinated mice, compared to unvaccinated mice and mice immunized with empty BPs (Fig. 8B). Loss of GFP was also observed after BP-OVA vaccination indicating that a portion of the Eμ-myc-GFP-OVA cells have undergone immune editing with these cells no longer express OVA. Therefore, BP-OVA is capable of eliciting anti-tumour immunity, even in the absence of adjuvant.
Discussion
Here, we demonstrate robust immunogenic potential of BPs as a carrier of MHC I and MHC II- restricted antigenic epitopes. BPs themselves were weakly immunogenic and capable of eliciting cytokine production. When coated with epitopes, BPs elicited DC-mediated MHC I and MHC II antigen presentation, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell priming resulting in differentiation into CTLs capable of mediating effective anti-tumour immunity.
BP vaccination is weakly immunogenic, with the induction of low levels of cytokine production, including by DCs and low levels of evident DC activation based on their cell surface phenotype. Despite this apparent lack of overt immunogenicity, subcutaneous immunisation with epitope-coated BP-OVA elicited CD8+ T cell responses even in the absence of adjuvant, elicited OVA-specific IFNγ-expressing CD8+ T cells, OVA-specific CD4+ T cell responses and importantly, CTL killers. Moreover, CTL immunity elicited by BP-OVA likely contributes to the efficacy of BP-OVA vaccination promoting effective antigen-specific tumour eradication in models of melanoma and B cell lymphoma. To examine the T cell parameters responsible for the efficacy of BP-OVA vaccination, a panel of gene deleted mice were examined. First, we examined IL-15, critical for CD8+ T cell effector function20 and indeed, CTL responses to BP-OVA were significantly impaired in IL-15-deficient mice. Despite inducing a significant expansion of anti-OVA CD4+ T cells, surprisingly, BP-OVA could generate CTL killing in the absence of CD4+ T cell help. The ability of BP-OVA to induce CTL was unperturbed by a lack of MHC II and/or CD40 signalling. CD4+ T cell help is critical for robust CTL immunity to many immunogens, promoting CD8+ T cell expansion, their differentiation into killers and survival16,18. Accordingly, engineering MHC II epitopes into vaccine platforms is considered an effective strategy to boost vaccine induced CTL responses25, however in this case immunisation with BP-OVA257-264 alone elicited a CTL response similar in magnitude, indicating in this setting inclusion of an antigen- MHC II helper T cell epitope does not impact or boost CTL outcomes. One signal that enables CD4+ T cell help to be bypassed in CTL induction is type I IFN26. Notably, we observed that in the absence of IFNAR, CTL responses to BP-OVA were reduced, suggesting type I IFN is indeed elicited by BP vaccination. Poly I:C signals via TLR3 to promote type I IFN production, and its coadministration with BP-OVA effectively boosted CTL killing. This was not the case for coadministration of CpG or LPS. TLR3 is highly expressed by DCs, in particular CD8+ and CD103+ cDC127,28, macrophages, fibroblasts and epithelial cells29. To test, the contribution of CD8+ and CD103+ cDC1 to anti-BP-OVA CTL immunity, Batf3-deficient mice were vaccinated. Batf3 is a basic leucine zipper ATF-like (BATF) transcription factor and critical for cDC1 development. Batf3-deficient mice22 lack CD103+ DCs and a proportion of CD8+ splenic DCs. CD103+ DCs reside in tissues, including the skin, where they capture antigen and migrate to the draining lymph node30 and therefore were considered likely participants in the immune response to BP-OVA. Surprisingly, Batf3-deficient mice remained capable of generating CTL killers in response to BP-OVA, albeit at reduced levels. These mice are not completely devoid of cross-presenting antigen presenting cells, however as in the absence of Batf3 pre-cDC1 develop normally with these cells capable of cross-presentation after immunization with anti-Clec9a-OVA31. Other antigen presenting cell subsets may also contribute to this response namely cDC2 and/or CD169+ macrophages for which there is also evidence of a capacity to cross-present32,33. Finally, it is possible that B cell responses and antibody production are contributing to tumour elimination elicited by BP vaccination, particularly given the efficacy by which this mode of vaccination elicits humoral immunity7,8,9.
Given the size of BPs used in this study (>500 nm), BP-OVA is most likely captured via phagocytosis34. Our analysis shows BP associated antigen, in this case OVA epitopes, is subsequently processed and cross-presented by MHC I and presented by MHC II. Phagocytosis is a major internalisation route that enables antigen to access the cross-presentation pathway35. MHC I cross-presentation of BP-OVA257-264 likely occurs following uptake of BPs into the early endosomes, endosomal escape and MHC I loading in the endoplasmic reticulum. It is unclear if BPs escape endosomes or only the associated polypeptides. The potential of BPs and/or their associated cargo to access the cytosol is an attractive property given that trapping of nanomaterials in endosomal compartments is a major rate limiting step in their use as therapeutics36. An alternative is that BP-associated antigen is loaded into MHC I localised in endosomes. Regardless, the ability of BPs to promote MHC I cross-presentation of antigen, in addition to providing antigen for MHC II loading, significantly expands their utility as vaccines given that access to MHC I cross-presentation pathway enables them to elicit CTL immunity. In summary, our study shows that BPs can be precision-engineered to serve as epitope delivery platforms that following single dose immunisation can effectively elicit T cell responses, including CTLs, and can be used to effectivity elicit immune-mediated tumour killing capacity.
Methods
Biopolymer synthesis
ClearColi™ (Lucigen, Middleton, WI), an endotoxin-free mutant of Escherichia coli BL21(DE3), harboring pMCS6914 was transformed with cloned pET-14b-PhaC (Supplementary Table 1) containing DNA encoding SIINFEKL and ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR to synthesize BP-OVA as well as empty BPs (control). Cells were cultivated in Luria–Bertani (LB) media containing 100 mg/L ampicillin and 50 mg/L chloramphenicol supplemented with 1% (w/v) glucose at 37 °C and 200 rpm for 20 h. Overnight cultures were seeded into 500 mL of LB media at an OD600 of 0.05 and incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm until an OD600 of 0.6–0.8 was achieved. BP production was induced by adding 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside and further growth at 25 °C for 48 h. Cells were harvested and disrupted releasing BPs which were subjected to a series of washes resulting in purified BPs as previously described7,9,10,11,12,13. BP suspensions were sterilized and stored in 10 mM Tris buffer pH7.5 containing 20% (v/v) ethanol at 4 °C. Sterility was confirmed by the absence of bacterial colonies after streaking the bead suspension on solid media and incubation of the particle-containing agar plate at 37 °C for 48 h.
Staining of BPs
Purified BPs were stained with lipophilic dye Nile red (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia). Briefly, 100 μL of a bead suspension (0.2 g/mL in 10 mM Tris pH 7.5) was mixed thoroughly with 10 μL of Nile red (0.2 mg/mL in dimethyl sulfoxide). The suspension was washed three times with 10 mM Tris buffer pH7.5 by centrifugation (8000 × g, 4 °C, 5 min) and stored in the dark prior to analysis.
Biopolymer particle characterization
Protein profiles of BPs were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 10% Bis-Tris gels mounted in a Bio-Rad XCell 3 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA) with 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer and GangNamTM-STAIN Prestained Protein Ladder (iNtRON Biotechnology, South Korea). Densitometry analyses of SDS-PAGE gels were used for protein quantification. Sequences of fusion proteins expressed by BPs were identified based on peptide mass fingerprinting by first excising the target protein bands from the SDS-PAGE gel and mixing with trypsin gold (Promega Corporation, WI). After desalting and filtration, tryptic peptides were subjected to a liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Sciex, MA). The content of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) within the beads as expressed in PHB weight (mg) per wet bead weight (g) was measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, CA) after acid digestion of freeze-dried beads. Size distribution and zeta potentials of BPs resuspended in 10 mM Tris buffer pH 7.5 were determined based on dynamic light scattering (DLS) using Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instrument, UK) at 25 °C with a scattering angle of 173°. Prior to size measurements, BP suspensions were diluted to avoid multiple scattering effects. Morphologies of BPs when encapsulated in cells as well as after purification were visualized by transmission electron microscope (TEM) using a Hitachi HT7700 TEM (Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Japan) operated at 80 kV. Prior to imaging, samples were fixed with glutaraldehyde and OsO4, then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, followed by infiltration with an epoxy resin. After incubation at 60 °C for 48 h, the BP-embedded resin was sliced into 70 nm sections and stained using a double contrasting technique by sequentially adding 5% uranyl acetate in ethanol and Reynolds lead citrate solution37 for TEM. All blots and gels were processed in parallel and were derived from the same experiments.
Mice
C57BL/6, OT-I/Ly5.138, OT-II/Ly5.139, I-Ab−/−17, IFNAR1−/−40 were bred maintained in pathogen-free environment at the Melbourne Bioresources Platform at Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute. Batf3−/−22, CD40−/−19 and IL-15−/−21 mice were bred in Peter Doherty Institute (PDI) animal facility. Mice used were between 6–12 weeks old. Experimental procedures were approved by Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Melbourne (1714375 and 20150). The experimental endpoints varies from day 3 to day 21 and the mice were euthanised via CO2 asphyxiation in appropriate CO2 chambers. The spleens and/or lymph nodes were harvested for analysis by flow cytometry.
MuTuDC cell line
MuTu dendritic cell line was provided by Hans Acha-Orbea (University of Lausanne, Switzerland)41. MuTu was cultured in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco Medium-Glutamax (IMDM, Thermo Fischer) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 100 μM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (37 °C, 10% CO2). To activate MuTu cells, 2 × 106 cells were incubated in 0.5 µM CpG type B 1668 (Geneworks) overnight (14 - 16 h). Cells were stained with mAbs specific for MHC II (M5/114.15.2, AF700, 1:400, 107622) and CD86 (GL1, APC, 1:400, 105012) (Biolegend) for flow cytometry analysis using LSR Fortessa (BD Bioscience) and analyzed on FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Immune cell analysis
C57BL/6 mice were injected with BPs subcutaneously and their inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) harvested 16 h post-vaccination. For DCs subset analysis, primary DCs from ILNs were purified as previously described42. DCs were stained with mAbs (Biolegend) specific for: CD11c (N418, BV510, 1:200, 117338), MHC II (M5/114.15.2, AF700, 1:400, 107622), CD8 (53-6.7, BV421, 1:200, 100738), Sirpα (P84, FITC, 1:200, 144006), CD103 (2E7, BV605, 1:400, 121433) and Ep-CAM (G8.8, APC-Cy7, 1:400, 118217). For innate immune cells analysis, a single cell suspension was obtained by pushing ILNs through 40 μm sieve (Corning). Cells were stained for mAbs (Walter and Eliza Hall Antibody Facility, Biolegend or BD) specific for: CD3 (KT3-1.1, BV510, 1/100, 740147), CD4 (GK1.5, BV605, 1:200, 100451), CD8 (53-6.7, BV510, 1/400, 100752), CD11c (N418, BV510, 1:200, 117338), B220 (RA3-6B2, B510, 1:100, 103247), Ly6G (GR-1, FITC, 1:100, WEHI), NK1.1 (PK136, PE, 1:600, 553165), Ly6C (5075-3.6, APC-Cy7, 1:800, 128026), MHC II (M5/114.15.2, AF700, 1:400, 107622) and F4/80 (F4/80, A647, 1:600, WEHI). Migratory DCs were defined as MHC IIhi CD11cint cells and further divided into: CD103+ dermal DCs, CD103- dermal DCs, and Langerhans cells (EpCAM+). Resident DCs were defined as MHC IIint CD11chi cDC1 (CD8+) and cDC2 (Sirpα+). For innate immune cells, CD4, CD3, CD8, B220 and CD11c positive cells were excluded in a “dump” channel and cells gated on CD11b+. Neutrophils were defined as Ly6G+ and NK cells as Ly6G- NK1.1+. After gating on Ly6G- NK1.1-, eosinophils were defined as SSC-Hint Ly6C-, Ly6C+ monocytes as SSC-Hlo Ly6C+, Ly6C- and macrophages as SSC-Hlo Ly6C− F4/80+. Counting beads (Accucheck, Thermo Fischer) were added to allow quantification of immune cells. Analysis was performed using LSR Fortessa (BD Biosience).
Cytometric bead array (CBA) assay
Splenic DCs were purified as previously described43. DCs were incubated for 24 h with 0.5 µM CpG Type B 1688 (Geneworks), 0.1 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma) or 100 µg PBs. Supernatants were removed for analysis. C57BL/6 mice were injected with BPs subcutaneously and cardiac blood was collected and centrifuged for serum collection. Cytokines were measured using BD cytometric bead array (CBA) Mouse Inflammation Kit (BD Biosciences) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Capture beads were specific for IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, MCP-1, IFNγ and TNFα. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software.
Enrichment of OT-I and OT-II T cells
Total LNs were harvested from OT-I × Ly5.1 and OT-II × Ly5.1 mice. Cells were stained with rat anti-mouse mAbs (WEHI) specific for: CD11b (M1/70), F4/80 (F4/80), red blood cells (TER119), Ly6G/-Ly6C (RB68C5), MHC II (M5/114), CD45R (RA3-6B2) and CD4 (GK1.5) for OT-I cells or CD8α (53-6.7) for OT-II cells followed by anti-rat IgG coupled with magnetic beads (Bio-Rad) to deplete and remove labelled cells. Enriched OT-I and OT-II cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, MPU) supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). T cells were incubated with 5 µM Cell Trace Violet (CTV, Thermo Fischer) for 20 min at 37 °C in PBS 0.1% BSA. Cells were washed twice in KDS-RPMI 2% FBS.
In vitro uptake assay
Primary splenic DCs were purified as previously described43. Activated primary DCs were incubated for 14–16 h in the presence of 0.5 µM CpG Type B 1688 (Geneworks). DCs were incubated with BPs labelled with Nile Red as previously described44 for 4 h at 4 °C and 37 °C and stained with CD11c (N418, FITC, 1:800, WEHI) and CD8 (53-6.7, BV421, 1:200, 100738, Biolegend) for flow cytometry analysis.
In vitro antigen presentation assay
Primary splenic DCs were purified as previously described43. Activated primary DCs were incubated for 14–16 h in the presence of 0.5 µM CpG Type B 1688 (Geneworks). Unstimulated DCs were pulsed with 100 μg OVA (Worthington) together with 5 µM CpG, and activated splenic DCs pulsed with 100 μg OVA for 45 minutes at 37 °C. Excess OVA was removed by washing. Both unstimulated and activated DCs were pulsed with BP or BP-OVA beads that remained in culture. 5 × 104 CTV-labelled purified OT-I or OT-II T cells were cultured in vitro with unstimulated or activated DCs in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 IU/mL penicillin (MPU) and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (MPU). Cells were incubated for 60 - 64 h (37 °C, 10% CO2). T cells were stained with mAbs specific for: CD4 (GK1.5, FITC, 1:500, 100406), CD8 (53-6.7, FITC, 1:400, WEHI), TCRVα2 (B20.1, APC, 1:800, WEHI) and Ly5.1 (A20.1, PE-Cy7, 1:200, 110730) (Biolegend). T cell proliferation was analyzed using flow cytometry and CTV dilution. Counting beads (Accucheck, Thermo Fischer) were included to enable determination of the number of proliferating T cells.
In vivo antigen presentation assay
OT-I and OT-II cells were purified as described. C57BL/6 mice were adoptively transferred intravenously with CTV-labelled 1 × 106 OT-I or OT-II cells. To ensure accurate quantification of T cell proliferation in vivo, 1 × 106 CFSE-labelled splenocytes were also transferred. After 24 h, mice were subcutaneously injected with 5 mg BP or BP-OVA. After 60 - 64 h, spleens and ILNs were harvested. Splenocytes were treated with red blood cell removal buffer (RCRB, MPU) and single cell suspensions stained with mAbs specific for: CD4 (GK1.5, FITC, 1:500, 100406), CD8 (53-6.7, FITC, 1:400, WEHI), TCRVα2 (B20.1, APC, 1:800, WEHI) and Ly5.1 (A20.1, PE-Cy7, 1:200, 110730) (Biolegend). Dividing OT-I and OT-II were identified by flow cytometry. Counting beads (Accucheck, Thermo Fischer) were used to enable determination of the number of proliferating T cells.
T cells kinetics in vivo
1 × 104 purified OT-I or OT-II cells were injected intravenously into C57BL/6 mice. One day later, mice were vaccinated with 5 mg BP-OVA beads subcutaneously. Mice were euthanized 3, 5, 7, 10, 13 or 21 days post-vaccination and their spleens and ILNs harvested. Single cell suspensions were generated and splenocytes treated with RCRB. Cells were stained with mAbs (Biolegend or WEHI Antibody Facility) specific for: TCRVα2 (B20.1, FITC, 1:800, WEHI), Ly5.1 (A20, PE-Cy7, 1:200, 110730), PD-1 (29 F.1A12, APC, 1:200, 135210), CD8 (53-6.7, BV421, 1:200, 100738) for OT-I or CD4 (GK1.5, PE, 1:400, 100408), TCRVα2 (B20.1, FITC, 1:800, WEHI), Ly5.1 (A20.1, PE-Cy7, 1:200, 110730), PD-1 (29 F.1A12, BV421, 1:100, 135217) for OT-II. Counting beads (Accucheck, Thermo Fischer) were used to enable quantification of T cells. For IFNγ production, OT-I were stimulated with OVA257-264 in the presence of BD Golgi PlugTM (5 h; 37 °C). Cells were stained for CD8 (53-6.7, BV421, 1:200, 100738), TCRVα2 (B20.1, FITC, 1:800, WEHI) and Ly5.1 (A20.1, PE-Cy7, 1:200, 110730) prior to permeabilization and fixation using BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit. Permeabilised cells were stained for IFNγ (XMG1.2, PE, 1:200, 554412, BD) and analysed by flow cytometry. IFNγ analysis was only conducted at time points where Ly5.1+ CD8+ TCRVα2+ cells represented more than 0.1% of total cells.
Cytotoxic T cell assay
Mice were injected with 5 mg of BP-OVA beads subcutaneously, in the presence of absence of 1 μg of CpG type B 1668 (Geneworks), 20 μg of polyI:C (InVivoGen) or 1 μg of LPS (Sigma). After six days, splenocytes were isolated from naïve C57B/L6 mice and prepared as target cells. Half the splenocyte suspension was pulsed (40 min at 37 °C) with 30 ng OVA257-264 peptide (Worthington) and the other half left untreated. Peptide-pulsed cells and non-pulsed cells were stained (20 min at 37 °C) with 5 µM and 0.5 µM CTV (Thermo Fischer), respectively. Excess dye was removed by washing. CTV-high OVA257-264-pulsed and CTV-low unpulsed cells were pooled at a ratio of 1:1 and 107 cells injected intravenously. After 36 - 42 h, splenocytes were isolated to analyze CTL activity. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software.
Calculation of % OVA-specific lysis is determined by:
\(\begin{array}{l}{{R}}=( \% {{\rm{CTV}}}^{{\rm{low}}}/ \% \,{{\rm{CTV}}}^{{\rm{high}}}) \% {\rm{OVA}}-{\rm{specific}}\; {\rm{lysis}}\\\quad=\,\left[\right.1-({{{r}}}_{{\rm{unprimed}}}/{{{r}}}_{{\rm{primed}}})\,{{\times}}\,100\end{array}\)
Tumour assays
C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated with 5 mg BP-OVA seven days prior to intravenous incoculation with 2.5 × 105 B16-OVA melanoma cells45 or five days prior to intravenous innoculation with 1 × 106 Eμ-myc-OVA-GFP lymphoma cells46. 18 days after B16-OVA inoculation, lungs were harvested and preserved in Fekete’s solution47 (for 1 l: 580 ml of 95% ethanol, 200 ml of H2O, 80 ml of 37% formaldehyde and 40 ml glacial acetic acid). Tumour nodules were scored, with the maximum number of tumours detected set at 250. For Eμ-myc-OVA-GFP lymphoma, spleens were harvested to obtain single cell suspension. Cells were stained with B220 (RA3-6B2, PE, 1:100, 103208, Biolegend) to allow quantification of Eμ-myc-OVA-GFP lymphoma in spleen at day four and five following tumour innoculation. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All data required conclusion are available in this paper and/or supplementary paper, except for DNA and amino acid sequences for BP will only be made available upon reasonable request subject to a confidentiality agreement. Materials are available upon request subject to a Material Transfer Agreement.
References
Moradali, M. F. & Rehm, B. H. A. Bacterial biopolymers: from pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 195–210 (2020).
Parlane, N. A. et al. Self-assembled protein-coated polyhydroxyalkanoate beads: properties and biomedical applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 3043–3057 (2017).
Gonzalez-Miro, M. et al. Polyester as antigen carrier toward particulate vaccines. Biomacromolecules 20, 3213–3232 (2019).
Wibowo, D. et al. Polymeric nanoparticle vaccines to combat emerging and pandemic threats. Biomaterials 268, 120597 (2021).
Hay, I. D., Hooks, D. O. & Rehm, B. H. A. Use of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates in protein display use of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates in protein display technologies. Hydrocarbon Lipid Microbiol. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1007/8623 (2014).
Grage, K. et al. Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoate granules: biogenesis, structure, and potential use as nano-/micro-beads in biotechnological and biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 10, 660–669 (2009).
Rubio Reyes, P., Parlane, N. A., Wedlock, D. N. & Rehm, B. H. A. Immunogencity of antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis self-assembled as particulate vaccines. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 306, 624–632 (2016).
Chen, S., Sandford, S., Kirman, J. R. & Rehm, B. H. A. Innovative antigen carrier system for the development of tuberculosis vaccines. FASEB J. 33, 7505–7518 (2019).
Chen, S. et al. Particulate mycobacterial vaccines induce protective immunity against tuberculosis in mice. Nanomaterials 11, 2060 (2021).
González-Miro, M. et al. Self-assembled particulate PsaA as vaccine against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Heliyon 3, e00291 (2017).
González-Miró, M. et al. Bioengineered polyester beads co-displaying protein and carbohydrate-based antigens induce protective immunity against bacterial infection. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–15 (2018).
Evert, B. J. et al. Epitope-coated polymer particles elicit neutralising antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. NPJ Vaccines 6, 1–12 (2021).
Chen, S. et al. Ambient temperature stable, scalable COVID-19 polymer particle vaccines induce protective immunity. Adv Healthc. Mater. 11, 2102089 (2022).
Amara, A. A. & Rehm, B. H. A. Replacement of the catalytic nucleophile cysteine-296 by serine in class II polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa-mediated synthesis of a new polyester: Identification of catalytic residues. Biochem. J. 374, 413–421 (2003).
Rehm, B. H. A. Polyester synthases: natural catalysts for plastics. Biochem. J. 376, 15–33 (2003).
Borst, J., Ahrends, T., Bąbała, N., Melief, C. J. M. & Kastenmüller, W. CD4+ T cell help in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 635–647 (2018).
Madsen, L. et al. Mice lacking all conventional MHC class II genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10338–10343 (1999).
Bedoui, S., Heath, W. R. & Mueller, S. N. CD4+ T-cell help amplifies innate signals for primary CD8+ T-cell immunity. Immunol. Rev. 272, 52–64 (2016).
Kawabe, T. et al. The immune responses in CD40-deficient mice: Impaired immunoglobulin class switching and germinal center formation. Immunity 1, 167–178 (1994).
Rückert, R. et al. Dendritic cell-derived IL-15 controls the induction of CD8 T cell immune reponses. Eur. J. Immunol. 33, 3493–3503 (2003).
Kennedy, M. K. et al. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 191, 771–780 (2000).
Hildner, K. et al. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8α+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science 322, 1097–1100 (2008).
Wong, G. & Qiu, X.-G. Type I interferon receptor knockout mice as models for infection of highly pathogenic viruses with outbreak potential. Sci. Press Zool. Res. 39, 3–14 (2018).
DiLillo, D. J., Yanaba, K. & Tedder, T. F. B cells are required for optimal CD4 + and CD8 + T cell tumor immunity: therapeutic B cell depletion enhances B16 melanoma growth in mice. J. Immunol. 184, 4006–4016 (2010).
Kreiter, S. et al. Mutant MHC class II epitopes drive therapeutic immune responses to cancer. Nature 520, 692–696 (2015).
Wiesel, M., Kratky, W., Oxenius, A. & Type, I. IFN substitutes for T cell help during viral infections. J. Immunol. 186, 754–763 (2011).
Jongbloed, S. L. et al. Human CD141+ (BDCA-3)+ dendritic cells (DCs) represent a unique myeloid DC subset that cross-presents necrotic cell antigens. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1247–1260 (2010).
Jelinek, I. et al. TLR3-specific double-stranded RNA oligonucleotide adjuvants induce dendritic cell cross-presentation, CTL responses, and antiviral protection. J. Immunol. 186, 2422–2429 (2011).
Matsumoto, M. et al. Subcellular localization of Toll-like receptor 3 in human dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 171, 3154–3162 (2003).
Del Rio, M. L., Bernhardt, G., Rodriguez-Barbosa, J. I. & Förster, R. Development and functional specialization of CD103+ dendritic cells. Immunol. Rev. 234, 268–281 (2010).
Caminschi, I. et al. Antibody responses initiated by Clec9A-bearing dendritic cells in normal and Batf3-/- mice. Mol. Immunol. 50, 9–17 (2012).
Asano, K. et al. CD169-positive macrophages dominate antitumor immunity by crosspresenting dead cell-associated antigens. Immunity 34, 85–95 (2011).
Joffre, O. P., Segura, E., Savina, A. & Amigorena, S. Cross-presentation by dendritic cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 557–569 (2012).
Nel, A. E. et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 8, 543–557 (2009).
Savina, A. & Amigorena, S. Phagocytosis and antigen presentation in dendritic cells. Immunol. Rev. 219, 143–156 (2007).
Martens, T. F., Remaut, K., Demeester, J., De Smedt, S. C. & Braeckmans, K. Intracellular delivery of nanomaterials: How to catch endosomal escape in the act. Nano Today 9, 344–364 (2014).
Reynolds, E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963).
Hogquist, K. A. et al. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 76, 17–27 (1994).
Barnden, M. J., Allison, J., Heath, W. R. & Carbone, F. R. Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA- based α- and β-chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements. Immunol. Cell Biol. 76, 34–40 (1998).
Müller, U. et al. Functional role of type I and type II interferons in antiviral defense. Science 264, 1918–1921 (1994).
Fuertes Marraco, S. A. et al. Novel murine dendritic cell lines: A powerful auxiliary tool for dendritic cell research. Front Immunol 3, 331 (2012).
Naik, S. H. Dendritic Cell Protocols Second Edition. (Humana Press, 2010).
Wilson, K. R. et al. MARCH1-mediated ubiquitination of MHC II impacts the MHC I antigen presentation pathway. PLoS ONE 13, 2255–2264 (2018).
Spiekermann, P., Rehm, B. H. A., Kalscheuer, R., Baumeister, D. & Steinbuchel, A. A sensitive, viable-colony staining method using Nile red for direct screening of bacteria that accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoicacids and other lipid storage compounds. Arch. Microbiol. 171, 73–80 (1999).
Falo, L. D., Kovacsovics-Bankowski, M., Thompson, K. & Rock, K. L. Targeting antigen into the phagocytic pathway in vivo induces protective tumour immunity. Nat. Med. 1, 649–653 (1995).
Prato, S., Mintern, J. D., Lahoud, M. H., Huang, D. C. & Villadangos, J. A. Induction of antigen-specific effector-phase tolerance following vaccination against a previously ignored B-cell lymphoma. Immunol. Cell Biol. 89, 595–603 (2011).
Overwijk, W. W. & Restifo, N. P. B16 as a mouse model for human melanoma. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 39, 20–21 (2000).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from National Health and Medical Research Grants. 1161101 (J.D.M.) and 1129672 (J.D.M.) and Australia Research Council Grants 190101242 (J.D.M.), 180100844 (J.D.M.), 160101373 (J.D.M.), 180100521 (J.D.M.). B.H.A.R. acknowledges the support. from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Projects (DP200100874 and DP220102236), ARC Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities (LE20010014) and Tour de Cure. The authors acknowledge technical assistance by Yaoying Lu (Griffith University) and the facilities, and the scientific and technical assistance, of the Australian Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Facility at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis at the University of Queensland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.H.A.R and J.D.M are equal senior authors. D.J., B.H.A.R. and J.D.M. designed the study. D.J. conducted all the immunological in vitro and most of the in vivo experiments, analysed the data and revised the paper. L.M.F. performed in vivo experiments involving BP-OVA257-264 immunization. S.P. and D.W. produced and performed quality control for all BPs used. J.D.M., D.J. and B.H.A.R. wrote, reviewed and edited the paper. All authors read and edited the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
B.H.A.R. is inventor of the BP technology and co-founder and shareholder of PolyBatics Ltd. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jenika, D., Pounraj, S., Wibowo, D. et al. In vivo assembly of epitope-coated biopolymer particles that induce anti-tumor responses. npj Vaccines 9, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00787-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00787-8
- Springer Nature Limited