Abstract
Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction at near-ambient temperatures requires a complex inventory of protons, hydroxyls, carbonate ions and alkali-metal ions at the cathode and anode to be managed, necessitating the use of ion-selective membranes to regulate pH. Anion-exchange membranes provide an alkaline environment, allowing CO2 reduction at low cell voltages and suppression of hydrogen evolution while maintaining high conversion efficiencies. However, the local alkaline conditions and the presence of alkali cations lead to problematic carbonate formation and even precipitation. Here we report a pure-water-fed (alkali-cation-free) membrane–electrode–assembly system for CO2 reduction to ethylene by integrating an anion-exchange membrane and a proton-exchange membrane at the cathode and anode side, respectively, under forward bias. This system effectively suppresses carbonate formation and prevents salt precipitation. A scaled-up electrolyser stack achieved over 1,000 h stability without CO2 and electrolyte losses and with 50% Faradaic efficiency towards ethylene at a total current of 10 A.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Main
Producing high-value chemicals and feedstocks from electrocatalytic CO2 reduction (ECO2R) powered by sustainable energy could close the carbon loop and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions1,2. Much of the research effort in this regard has focused on optimizing the product selectivity, that is, the Faradaic efficiency (FE), of the catalysts for ECO2R, increasing their productivity (current density) and lowering the overpotentials of the reduction reactions3,4,5,6,7. However, optimizing only the catalytic module in the ECO2R system often does not translate into better overall system performance in large-scale reactors, where system stability is a major concern. The short lifespan of ECO2R is partially caused by carbonate precipitation and crossover accompanied by electrolyte loss, resulting in additional energy consumption and CO2 loss8.
Currently, most ECO2R systems include alkali-metal electrolytes (for example, KHCO3, KOH) (Supplementary Fig. 1) because alkali-metal cations accelerate ECO2R reaction kinetics, whose activity trend follows the sequence Cs+ > K+ > Na+ > Li+ (ref. 9). However, the local alkaline cathode condition can lead to carbonate formation, while introducing alkali-metal cations can even result in salt precipitation, complicating the electrolysis system and causing unstable overall system performance. For example, in the membrane–electrode–assembly (MEA) cell, the local alkaline cathode condition causes a major fraction of the input CO2 to react with the electrogenerated OH− to produce carbonate10,11,12 (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Alkali cations can diffuse across the anion-exchange membrane (AEM) to the outer Helmholtz plane of the cathode, and anions (for example, CO32−, HCO3−, HCOO− and CH3COO−) can be transported to the anode to release CO2 and be re-oxidized to CO2 (refs. 9,13,14 and Supplementary Fig. 1). This process not only results in CO2 and product losses but also gradually increases the cell voltage and even could consume up to ∼70% of the energy input for ECO2R to C2H4 (ref. 15,16). Thus, so far, the system stability of ECO2R to C2H4 in the flow and MEA cells has generally been less than 200 h (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1).
In this Article, we describe the design of an AEM + proton-exchange membrane (PEM) assembly (APMA) MEA system with pure H2O as the anolyte to suppress/prevent carbonate formation/precipitation. The AEM interfaces with the cathode in the APMA system to provide an alkaline cathode environment for ECO2R. The introduced PEM in contact with the anode can effectively prevent the crossover of all anions. More importantly, the membrane configuration and pure H2O anolyte suppress the reaction of CO2 with the electrogenerated OH− to form carbonate and salt precipitation. We employed a commercially available AEM and PEM to construct the pure-H2O-fed (alkali-cation-free) APMA-MEA architecture, which was assembled with high-performance surface-step-rich Cu (SS-Cu) for ECO2R to C2H4. In situ Raman spectra and isotope labelling experiments revealed that carbonate formation can be effectively suppressed in the pure-H2O-fed APMA system rather than regenerating CO2 from carbonate. As a result of suppressing carbonate formation/precipitation and anion crossover, ECO2R to C2H4 could operate continuously for over 1,000 h without CO2 or electrolyte losses in a pure-H2O-fed six-APMA-MEA cell stack while achieving a C2H4-specific FE of 50% at 10 A.
Design of the APMA system
Currently, the use of PEM and bipolar membrane (BPM) systems with an acidic cathode environment can eliminate carbonate formation by regenerating CO2 from carbonate to some extent11,12,17,18,19 (Supplementary Fig. 1), but the diffusion of alkali-metal cations from the anolyte under the electric field causes electrolyte loss and the acidic cathode environment also results in a lower product FE owing to the more thermodynamically favourable hydrogen evolution reaction (HER)9,20. Furthermore, the BPM MEA system needs to have the cation-exchange layer (CEL) and anion-exchange layer (AEL) in contact with the cathode and the anode, respectively12,17,21,22 (Fig. 1a). Under reverse bias (Supplementary Note 1), water dissociation occurs at the CEL/AEL interface23, with H+/OH− driven through CEL/AEL to take part in the ECO2R/oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Usually, the water dissociation catalyst (for example, TiO2 or Al(OH)3) must be assembled at the CEL/AEL interface to lower the water dissociation overpotential24,25,26 (Fig. 1b). However, in this configuration, the BPM is easily delaminated, which can result in a catastrophic degradation of the cell stability.
Despite the benefits of the alkali environment and the alkali cations for the CO2 reduction kinetics in AEM, PEM and BPM systems, they show inferior system performance (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). Thus, it is highly desirable to perform ECO2R in alkali-cation-free media while maintaining an alkali cathode environment. Consequently, we designed an APMA-MEA system with pure H2O as the anolyte to suppress/prevent carbonate formation/precipitation (Fig. 1c). Importantly, the AEM interfaces with the cathode in the APMA system to provide an alkaline cathode environment since the AEM contains abundant OH− (refs. 23,27). In contrast to the previous BPM system12,17,26 (Fig. 1a), the APMA does not include a water dissociation catalyst, as water dissociation occurs at the cathode and anode, and the produced OH− and H+ can spontaneously form water at the interface (standard Gibbs free energy change, \(\Delta {G}_{\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}}^{\theta } < 0\); Fig. 1d), and the formed H2O can pass through the AEM/PEM to the cathode/anode. The introduced PEM can effectively prevent the crossover of all anions, and the APMA and pure H2O anolyte can suppress the reaction of CO2 with the electrogenerated OH− to form salt/precipitation under the influence of the electrostatic field (see below). In principle, the commercial BPM can also meet our APMA system requirements (Fig. 1e). However, the current BPM technology is immature, making its performance vary greatly. The BPM usually has the junction/bonding layer at the AML/CEL interface (Fig. 1f). The water formation at the interface may result in delamination and lead to instability of the BPM due to the difficulty in controlling the mechanical strength of the junction/bonding. In light of the above, the commercially available AEM and PEM were used to construct our APMA system.
Synthesis and characterizations of the SS-Cu catalyst
SS-Cu nanoparticles (with an average diameter of ∼60 nm) with abundant stacking faults and grain boundaries were prepared by a facile solution method (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). The stacking faults and grain boundaries favour higher ECO2R activity3,28,29,30. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning TEM (STEM) images revealed abundant stacking faults that intersect with each other (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3) and multitudinous, interlaced grain boundaries (Fig. 2c) in SS-Cu. Furthermore, grain boundaries contain Σ3 coincident site lattice boundaries (twin boundaries) and form some typical five-fold twinning structures (Fig. 2c, inset and Supplementary Fig. 5). These abundant stacking faults and grain boundaries can induce sizeable tensile strain on the surface layer3,30,31. Indeed, a significant local tensile strain as large as ∼0.8% was observed around the surface exits of both twin boundaries and stacking faults in SS-Cu by geometric-phase analysis (GPA) (Fig. 2d,e and Supplementary Fig. 6), compared with that of a defect-free Cu lattice (Supplementary Fig. 7). Furthermore, stepped surfaces were also induced at the surface exits of twin boundaries and stacking faults (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 6), giving rise to surface Cu atoms with low coordination number (see Supplementary Note 2 for more information about SS-Cu, as well as Supplementary Videos 1 and 2, Supplementary Figs. 8–19 and Supplementary Table 2).
ECO2R performance in the conventional flow cell
Upon successfully obtaining the SS-Cu catalyst, we first evaluated its ECO2R performance in a flow cell with the conventional alkaline condition (1 M KOH). SS-Cu delivered a peak FE of ∼80% towards C2H4 at about −0.58 V (stated versus a reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) throughout the text, unless otherwise noted), at which \(j_{\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_4}\) reached ∼568 mA cm−2 and the half-cell energy efficiency (EEhalf cell) of C2H4 was up to ∼51% (Fig. 3a,c and Supplementary Fig. 20). Compared with the current best ECO2R-to-C2H4 performance in 1 M KOH (\(\mathrm{FE}_{\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_4}\) of ∼80% and \(j_{\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_4}\) of 400–480 mA/cm2, at about −1.5 V)5, SS-Cu delivered a ∼1.3 times higher \(j_{\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_4}\) and a ∼2.6 times lower potential. Interestingly, we found that the partial current density (\(j_{\mathrm{C}_{2+}}\), \(j_{\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_4}\) or \(j_{\mathrm{without}\,\mathrm{H}_2}\)) showed a strong linear correlation with the function of the tensile strain and coordination number (see Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Figs. 21–35 for details).
To eliminate carbonate formation, precipitation and crossover in the AEM cell during ECO2R, we also performed ECO2R over SS-Cu in strong acid (pH <1) to regenerate CO2 from the formed carbonate11. Under the strongly acidic catholyte with abundant K+, the system delivered barely satisfactory ECO2R-to-C2H4 performance (\(\mathrm{FE}_{\mathrm{C}_{2+}}\) of ∼48% and \(\mathrm{FE}_{\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_4}\) of ∼33% with jtotal of ~345 mA cm−2 at −1.1 V) in a PEM assembled flow cell (Fig. 3b,d; see Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Figs. 36–38 for details). Considering practical viability, we sought to operate ECO2R in the PEM-MEA cell with an acidic cathode environment (just as in Supplementary Fig. 1). The anolyte with K+ was used not only as the proton resource but also to supply K+ to the cathode. Although we initially observed formation of ECO2R products (such as CO and C2H4), ECO2R shut down after a few minutes, and HER became dominant. The continuous K+ passed through the PEM from the anode to the cathode, accompanied by carbonate salt precipitation in the cell’s flow channel, which blocked CO2 mass transfer (Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 39).
ECO2R performance in the pure-H2O-fed APMA system
On the basis of the results described above, we proposed a pure-H2O-fed (alkali-cation-free) MEA electrolysis architecture, which is designed with the expectation that it can prevent carbonate formation/precipitation and anion crossover. The central concept of the pure-H2O-fed MEA system for ECO2R is maintaining the alkaline cathode environment necessary for effective ECO2R to multicarbon products27,32. Thus, we constructed an APMA, which was encompassed in the MEA architecture held under pressure to prevent delamination and to ensure uniform contact between the gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) and membranes (Fig. 4a). The AEM in contact with the cathode can create an alkaline cathode environment, while the PEM facing the anode can circumvent the crossover of all anions, including anion products (such as HCOO− and CH3COO−).
Under forward bias, H2O dissociation occurs at the cathode and anode, participating in ECO2R and the OER (Fig. 1c). The remaining OH− at the cathode and H+ at the anode can be transported through the AEM and PEM, respectively, forming H2O at their interface (equations (1)–(3)), which can pass through the AEM/PEM to the cathode/anode to re-participate in ECO2R or drain from the flow channel.
More importantly, in this APMA-MEA system architecture, the probability that the reactant CO2 will react with the electrogenerated OH− to form salt precipitation (such as K2CO3) is drastically reduced (Supplementary Fig. 40). The thermodynamic explanation is that the pure H2O system can effectively suppress (bi)carbonate salt formation while the precipitation of salts (such as K2CO3 or KHCO3) can be thoroughly prevented owing to the absence of cations under the influence of the electrostatic field. Furthermore, although a small amount of CO2 can dissolve in H2O to form H2CO3 (equation (4)), the alkaline cathode environment and pure H2O anolyte can suppress H2CO3 formation. The pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system suppresses/prevents carbonate formation/precipitation and anion crossover.
However, the pure H2O electrolysis system cannot avoid high operation voltage. For this pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system, the cell voltage can be conceptually decomposed into the following (equation (5)) (to simplify the calculation, we take ECO2R to C2H4 as an example without considering the other products; see Supplementary Note 5 for details): the thermodynamic potential of ECO2R to C2H4 in the alkaline environment and OER in H2O (\({E}_{\mathrm{CO}_{2}/\mathrm{C}_{2}\mathrm{H}_{4}}^{\,\theta ,\mathrm{base}}-{E}_{\mathrm{O}_{2}/\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}}^{\,\theta ,\mathrm{neutral}}=-1.98\,\mathrm{V}\)); the ECO2R-to-C2H4 and OER overpotentials at a given current density (\({\delta }_{\mathrm{C}_{2}\mathrm{H}_{4}}^{\mathrm{base}}\) and \({\delta }_{\mathrm{OER}}^{\mathrm{neutral}}\)); the thermodynamic potential of H2O formation (\({E}_{\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}}^{\theta }=-{\Delta G}_{\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}}^{\theta }/F=0.83\,\mathrm{V}\) at standard conditions due to the acidic and alkaline environments at the APMA interface); the overpotential of H2O formation (\({\delta }_{\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}}\)); the voltage loss from the ohmic resistance (EOhm); the voltage loss from the Nernst potential (\({E}_{\mathrm{Nernst}\, \mathrm{loss}}=0.058\Delta \mathrm{pH}\), at room temperature). Here, \({{\rm{\delta }}}_{{{\rm{H}}}_{2}{\rm{O}}}\), EOhm and ENernst loss are defined to be positive. Since CO is a crucial intermediate for C2H4 formation and the thermodynamic potential of ECO2R to CO is more negative than that of ECO2R to C2H4 (refs. 7,33,34,35), \({E}_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}}_{2}/{\rm{CO}}}^{{{\theta }},{\rm{base}}}\) was also calculated (Supplementary Note 5).
where R, T and z are the ideal gas constant, temperature and ion valency, respectively. At room temperature (~25 °C), the ohmic resistance of the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA cell was very low (~0.88 Ω cm2) (Fig. 4b). However, when the current density is high, EOhm cannot be ignored (for example, at 100 mA cm−2, EOhm = ~0.09 V). In addition, under the pure-H2O anolyte, the Nernst equation can be simplified to equation (6) at room temperature36 (Supplementary Note 5). The anolyte pH is ~7 owing to the use of pure H2O. We assume that the OH− concentration on the AEM surface was 1 M (that is, pH 14), at which the potential drop (ENernst loss) of the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA cell was about 0.41 V. Therefore, without considering overpotentials (\({\delta }_{\mathrm{C}_{2}\mathrm{H}_{4}}^{\mathrm{base}}\), \({\delta }_{\mathrm{OER}}^{\mathrm{neutral}}\) and \({\delta }_{\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}}\)) or EOhm, the theoretical cell voltage of our pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system used for ECO2R to C2H4 needs to be more negative than −1.56 V at standard conditions. Additionally, when considering the key intermediate (CO) of C2H4 formation (\({E}_{\mathrm{CO}_{2}/\mathrm{CO}}^{\,\theta ,\mathrm{base}}=-0.93\,\mathrm{V}\)), the theoretical cell voltage would be up to −1.74 V.
The above findings suggest that the operating voltage of the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system needs to be lowered for effective energy conversion. In other words, the overpotentials of all the reactions, including ECO2R, the OER and water formation, must be minimized. Indeed, when we increased the reaction temperature of ECO2R on SS-Cu in the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system from room temperature (~25 °C) to 80 °C (Fig. 4c), the cell voltage decreased from ~4.55 to 4.20 V at 300 mA cm−2. Meanwhile, the cell resistance was reduced by ~0.257 Ω cm2 at 80 °C (Fig. 4b), meaning a voltage drop of ~0.08 V. However, the cell voltage drop of ~0.35 V was much more than ~0.08 V, indicating that increasing the reaction temperature mainly lowers the overpotentials. The optimal FEs for ECO2R were achieved at 60 °C, where the FEs for carbon gas products and H2 were ~55.67% (~12.03% for CO, ~0.76% for CH4 and ~42.88% for C2H4) and ~30.81% (Fig. 4c), respectively. However, when the reaction temperature was increased to 80 °C, the FE of H2 was even over 50%, indicating that excessive temperature would suppress ECO2R and make the HER dominant. Thus, the following ECO2R tests were carried out at 60 °C.
Furthermore, the reaction kinetics of the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system for ECO2R was quantified. The total overpotential (δtotal) at a given current density, including ECO2R, the OER and water formation, was assessed at different temperatures by using the Gibbs–Helmholtz and Nernst equations (δtotal is defined in Supplementary Note 5). Owing to the lack of pH data for the commercial AEM, we assume the pH of AEM to be in the range of 8–14. Taking ECO2R to C2H4 as an example without considering other products, δtotal decreased with increase of the reaction temperature (Fig. 4g). At 300 mA cm−2 and 60 °C, the total overpotential (δtotal) of the system was ~91.17 mV/10 mA cm−2. Considering the key intermediate (CO), δtotal was only ~85.50 mV/10 mA cm−2 at 300 mA cm−2 (Fig. 4g). Despite using pure H2O as the anolyte, the APMA-MEA system still showed the potential for effective ECO2R to C2H4.
The pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system was further evaluated for its reliability in preventing carbonate formation/precipitation and anion crossover. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy showed that almost no cations were present in the pure H2O anolyte (Supplementary Fig. 41), except for Na+ at part per billion level, originating from the water source. Then, we tested the anodic product compositions. As expected, only O2 from the OER was present in the anode product without CO2 loss (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 42). The anolyte did not contain the other neutral species (such as HCOOH and CH3COOH) from the cathode (Supplementary Fig. 42). Additionally, in situ Raman measurements directly showed that carbonate formation was effectively suppressed (the peak at ~1,064 cm−1) on the SS-Cu GDE surface in our pure-H2O-fed APMA system, compared with that in the alkaline-electrolyte system (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Figs. 43–45).
Furthermore, to verify that the APMA system can suppress carbonate formation, rather than regenerating CO2 by H+ from the anolyte reacting with carbonate, we also performed an isotope labelling experiment (using H218O as the anolyte). If CO2 can react with the electrogenerated 18OH− into carbonate, one of the oxygens in the carbonate will be 18O (equation (7)). Thus, the regenerated CO2 from these carbonates can be labelled by 18O. However, the intensity of C16O18O (CO2) barely changed during the entire process when the APMA system was running and after shutdown (Fig. 4f), indicating that CO2 did not react with the electrogenerated 18OH− into carbonate. Instead, trace amounts of C16O18O come from the initial reactant CO2 because the C16O18O intensity did not change during or after ECO2R. These results suggest that, under forward bias, the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system configuration can effectively prevent carbonate formation/precipitation and anion crossover.
We examined the ECO2R product distribution of SS-Cu in the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system at 60 °C, under the galvanostatic mode (Fig. 5a). At 300 mA cm−2, the peak FE of ECO2R products reached ~66%, including a ~52% FE towards C2+ (~43% for C2H4, ~6% for C2H5OH, ~2% for CH3CH2CH2OH and ~1% for CH3COOH). The cell voltage was ~4.3 V without iR (i, current; R, resistance) compensation. Without counting the energy consumed by the reaction temperature, the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system delivered a full-cell energy efficiency (EEfull cell) of ~18.2% for ECO2R. The peak FEs and partial current densities of products in the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system were comparable to those in an AEM-MEA cell with 1 M KOH as the anolyte (Fig. 5a–d and Supplementary Fig. 46). Furthermore, the system carbon balance at 300 mA cm−2 was also evaluated by using a previous method34,37,38. All the ECO2R products were recovered to the CO2 (Supplementary Fig. 47). The sum of the CO2 flow rate (~29.76 sccm) including CO2 recovered as products and unreacted CO2 is close to the initial CO2 flow rate (30 sccm). The slight discrepancy can be attributed to a small amount of product residue or leakage. The carbon balance evaluation suggests that our APMA-MEA system has virtually no CO2 loss.
The practicality of the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA cell for ECO2R
Motivated by the superior ECO2R performance exhibited by SS-Cu in the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system, we designed and customized a cell stack containing six MEA cells to evaluate the durability and practicality of the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA architecture (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 48). This scale-up operation and stability measurements of the APMA-MEA cell stack could pave the way for ECO2R to C2H4 towards industrial-scale operation. At a total current of 10 A, six SS-Cu GDEs give an FE of ~50% towards C2H4 (Fig. 5f). The system remained stable for more than 1,000 h with a full-cell-stack voltage between 25 and 27 V without iR compensation (a cell voltage of ~4.4 V for each set of MEA cells; Supplementary Fig. 49). In stark contrast, the system stability of ECO2R on SS-Cu in an AEM-MEA cell with 1 M KOH as the anolyte was less than 4 h, with severe electrolyte and CO2 losses (Supplementary Fig. 50). Suppressing/preventing carbonate formation/precipitation using the pure-H2O-fed APMA system certainly boosted the system’s durability, but the strong mechanical strength of APMA itself and the excellent water permeability of the commercial AEM and PEM (Sustainion X37-50 and Nafion 117) of the APMA were also conducive to improving the system stability at a non-extreme current density. The CO2-to-C2H4 conversion in this alkali-cation-free six-APMA-MEA-cell stack was up to ~39%. After 1,000 h of operation, no GDE flooding was observed, which could be attributed to the increased reaction temperature (60 °C) allowing H2O accumulated in the GDEs to be discharged quickly along with the steam.
In this pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA stack system, we also developed an integrated circuit based on an Arduino development board to monitor the ECO2R process (Supplementary Fig. 49, inset). Accordingly, each cell showed identical voltage throughout the 1,000 h measurement, except for some fluctuations during the first 100 h (Supplementary Fig. 49), demonstrating the potential of the APMA-MEA stack for highly stable ECO2R to C2H4, as demanded for industrial operation. The overall system performance of ECO2R to C2H4 on SS-Cu in our pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system is highly competitive with previous reports (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). The overall system performance improvements of ECO2R to C2H4 in the pure-H2O-fed APMA-MEA system can be attributed to the combination of the APMA electrolysis architecture and the superior catalytic activity of SS-Cu.
In situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements show that the crystal structure of SS-Cu is stable during ECO2R at different cell voltages (Supplementary Figs. 51–53). Furthermore, annular bright-field STEM (ABF-STEM), TEM and HRTEM images show that the SS-Cu catalyst retained its structural integrity throughout the long ECO2R operation (Supplementary Fig. 54). This can be judged from the presence of atomically resolved stacking faults and grain boundaries (twin boundaries) in the HAADF-STEM images before and after prolonged ECO2R (Supplementary Fig. 54).
Investigation of C2H4 formation
The key intermediates of C–C coupling for C2H4 formation on SS-Cu were studied by in situ Raman spectroscopy, electrocatalytic CO reduction experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see Supplementary Note 6 and Supplementary Figs. 55–59 for details). In situ Raman measurements revealed the presence of the intermediate *CO and C–H bond, while the ECOR experiments excluded *CO dimerization for C2H4 formation. By comparing the reaction energy of possible reaction intermediates (such as *CHO dimerization, *CO + *COH), the favourable C–C coupling of C2H4 formation on SS-Cu might be that *CO and *CHO couple to *COCHO owing to a lower reaction energy. The mechanism is similar to the mainstream ECO2R to C2H4 mechanism reported previously8,33, which means that the highly efficient performance cannot be attributed to a newly found reaction pathway, but rather to the successful regulation of ion and mass diffusion and the suppression of side reactions in the APMA-MEA system.
Conclusions
We demonstrate that the pure-H2O-fed (alkali-cation-free) APMA-MEA system can effectively suppress/prevent carbonate formation/precipitation and anion crossover during ECO2R while circumventing the burdensome HER as well as CO2 and electrolyte losses. The simplicity of the system design improves the overall system performance for ECO2R by maintaining an alkaline cathode environment without supplying alkali cations. The extensive experiments reveal that the pure-H2O-fed APMA system can effectively suppress/prevent carbonate formation/precipitation rather than regenerate CO2 from carbonate. At an industrial-level current, the overall system stability of scaled-up ECO2R to C2H4 on SS-Cu is significantly enhanced in the pure-H2O-fed AMPA-MEA cell stack. However, although our system showed competitive system performance for ECO2R to C2H4, further improving the product selectivity and lowering the operation voltage are still required for efficient energy conversion.
Methods
Chemicals
Deuterium oxide (D2O, 99.9 at.% D; 151882), 3-(trimethylsilyl)propionic-2,2,3,3-d4 acid sodium salt (TSP, ≥98.0% (NMR); 269913), Nafion solution (5 wt.%; 274704), polytetrafluoroethylene preparation (60% solution in H2O; 665800), oleylamine (70%; O7805), copper(I) chloride (CuCl, 97%; 212946), n-hexane (C6H14, 99%; HX0293), octadecylamine (≥ 99%; 305391), trioctylphosphine (90%; 117854), squalane (96%; 234311), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 99.99%; 306568), phosphoric acid (H3PO4, 85%; 345245), potassium nitrate (KNO3, 99.0%; 221295), lead(II) nitrate (Pb(NO3)2, ≥99%; 228621), potassium iodide (KI, 99%; 221945), water-18O (18O H2O, 10 at.% 18O; 332089) and potassium chloride (KCl, 99.0–100.5%; P3911) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, ≥85.0%), nickel foam (2 mm thickness, 99.9%) and titanium fibre felt (0.25 mm thickness, 99.9%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China). Nitric acid (HNO3, pH −1.0, 70%; A200) and isopropanol (C3H8O, IPA, ≥99.5%; 3776) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. The AEM (Fumasep FAA-3-PK-75), gas diffusion layer (carbon paper, GDE; Sigracet 39 BB) and Nafion 117 membrane (591239) were purchased from FuelCellStore. The alkaline ionomer solution (5% in ethanol, Sustainion XA-9) and AEM (Sustainion X37-50) were purchased from Dioxide Materials.
Material and electrode preparation
In a typical synthesis, 0.05 g of CuCl and 0.1 g of octadecylamine were dissolved in 1 ml of squalane at 80 °C under Ar atmosphere and kept at this temperature for 0.5 h to form Cu-based stock solution. Next, 10 ml of oleylamine and 0.5 ml of trioctylphosphine were added to a flask and heated to 200 °C under Ar atmosphere with intense magnetic agitation. Then, the Cu-based stock solution was quickly injected into the about 200 °C oleylamine solution and kept at this temperature for 5 h. After natural cooling, the resulting sample was collected by centrifugation and washed several times with n-hexane. Finally, the sample was blow-dried with Ar gas at room temperature. The sample was denoted as SS-Cu.
The SS-Cu samples were annealed at various temperatures (250, 350 and 450 °C; Cu-250, Cu-350 and Cu-450) in a tube furnace for 2 h under a mixed gas (H2/Ar: 5 v/v%; 200 sccm) to prevent oxidization. In addition, the oxide-derived Cu was prepared by directly calcining SS-Cu at 450 °C in air for 2 h.
The flow cell and MEA cell measurements under the alkaline condition were carried out as follows: Cathode GDEs were prepared on conventional carbon paper. The catalyst was dispersed in a mixed solution containing H2O and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (1:4 v/v), and some alkaline ionomer solution (5 wt.% versus catalyst, Sustainion XA-9) by sonication for 1 h to form a 1 mg ml−1 catalyst ink. GDEs were fabricated by spraying the ink onto the carbon paper with a microporous carbon gas diffusion layer with a loading of ~1 mg cm−2, followed by drying at 120 °C in vacuum for 1 h before use (SS-Cu GDE). The anode electrode was a mixture of IrOx and RuOx-supported carbon paper.
The flow cell and MEA cell measurements under the acidic condition were carried out as follows: The alkaline ionomer was replaced with Nafion solution. Polymethylmethacrylate containing polytetrafluoroethylene solution was sprayed on the SS-Cu GDE as the cathode GDE (SS-Cu/polymethylmethacrylate). The mixture of Pt-supported Ti fibre felt (Pt/Ti) was used as the anode electrode. Pt was sputtered on the Ti fibre felt using a pure Pt target in Ar environment (5 × 10−3 Torr) in a magnetron sputtering system.
For MEA measurements under pure H2O, the SS-Cu GDE and Pt/Ti GDE were directly used as the cathode and anode electrodes, respectively.
Electrocatalytic CO2/CO reduction
Electrochemical tests in the flow and MEA cells were performed using an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660E) connected to a current booster (CHI 680C), except for the MEA cell stack. A mass flow controller (Alicat Scientific MC) was used to control the CO2 flow rate. The flow rate of the electrolyte stream was 5 ml min−1, controlled by a peristaltic pump unless otherwise noted. The cathode area in the flow cell and MEA was 1 cm × 1 cm unless otherwise noted. All ECO2R measurements were carried out at room temperature unless otherwise noted. For all flow cell measurements, Hg/Hg2Cl2 (saturated calomel electrode, saturated KCl) was used as the reference electrode, and all cathode potentials (versus Hg/Hg2Cl2) were converted to the RHE scale using the equation
where R is the resistance between the cathode and reference electrodes measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in the frequency range from 105 Hz to 0.01 Hz at open circuit potential. For all the MEA measurements, the full-cell voltages are directly presented without iR compensation.
Under the alkaline condition, for the flow cell measurements, 1 M KOH was used as the electrolyte, and the AEM (Fumasep FAA-3-PK-75) was used to separate the catholyte and anolyte compartments. CO2/CO was supplied to the cathode at a flow rate of 30 sccm. For ECO2R in an MEA cell with the alkaline condition, 1 M KOH was used as the anolyte, and the cathode and anode GDEs were separated by an AEM (Sustainion X37-50).
Under the acidic condition, for the flow cell measurements, 1 M H3PO4 with 3 M KCl/KI was used as the catholyte, and 1 M H3PO4 was used as the anolyte. The cathode and anode chambers were separated by Nafion 117. For MEA measurements, 1 M H3PO4 with 3 M KNO3 was used as the anolyte. CO2 was supplied to the cathode at a flow rate of 30 sccm.
For scale-up APMA-MEA stack measurements, an integrated circuit based on an Arduino development board (UNO R3, A000066) was used as an aided monitoring system connected with the CoolTerm serial port terminal application tool. All ECO2R measurements in the APMA-MEA stack were carried out by using a customized Varied d.c. power supply (1,000 W). The flow rates of the anolyte and CO2 were 15 ml min−1 and 30 sccm, respectively. The reaction temperature was 60 °C. For the APMA system, before assembly, the AEM was cleaned with pure H2O to eliminate other ions since AEM was immersed in 1 M KOH beforehand. The commercial PEM was soaked in ~3% hydrogen peroxide for 1 h at 80 °C, deionized water for 1 h at 80 °C and 0.5 M H2SO4 for another 1 h at 80 °C. The resulting PEM was cleaned with pure H2O and preserved in deionized water at room temperature.
Product analysis
For the electrocatalytic CO2 and CO reduction, the gas and liquid products were quantified by gas chromatography (GC, GC-2030; Shimadzu) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR, ECZ500R, 500 MHz; JEOL) spectroscopy. The GC device was equipped with two thermal conductivity detectors for H2, O2, N2, He, CO and CO2 signals and a flame ionization detector for CH4, C2H4 and C2H6 signals. The GC was carried out using packed columns of two Porapak-N, a Molecular sieve-13X, a Molecular sieve-5A, a Porapak-Q and an HP-PLOT AL/S column, employing He (99.999%) and N2 (99.999%) as the carrier gases. To calibrate the CO2 flow rate at the outlet of the cell (\(f_{\mathrm{CO}_2}\)), He used as the internal standard was fed at 10 sccm and mixed with the outlet gas stream of the cell before injecting for GC34. The FEs of gas products were calculated by using the equation
where Nx is the number of electrons transferred for product x, F is the Faradaic constant, mx is the molar fraction of product x determined by GC, \(f_{\mathrm{CO}_2}\) is the molar flow rate of the CO2 and jtotal is the total current density.
The liquid products were analysed by 500 MHz 1H NMR spectroscopy (ECZ500R; JEOL) with water suppression. TSP and D2O were used as the reference standard and lock solvent, respectively. The FEs of liquid products were calculated by using the equation
where Nx is the number of electrons transferred for liquid product x, F is the Faradaic constant, Cx is the concentration of liquid product x determined by 1H NMR, Vx is the volume of the electrolyte and Qtotal is the total charge.
The half-cell and full-cell energy efficiencies (EEhalf cell and EEfull cell) were calculated using the following equations (taking the OER as an example of the anode reaction and assuming it occurs with an overpotential of 0 V, EƟOER = 1.23 V versus RHE):
where \({E}_\mathrm{OER}^{\theta }\) and \({E}_{x}^{\theta }\) are the thermodynamic potentials (versus RHE) for OER and the ECO2R to product x, respectively, FEx is the FE of product x, EC is the potential applied at the cathode and Efull cell is the cell voltage of the MEA system.
The CO2 conversion was calculated using the equations
where fx is the molar rate of formation of product x, t is the electrolysis reaction time and A is the geometric area of the electrode.
In situ electrochemical Raman measurements
In situ Raman measurements were carried out by using a customized spectro-electrochemical flow cell fabricated with a sapphire window (0.15 ± 0.02 mm) in front of the cathode GDE. Ni felt was used as a counterelectrode. The overall system was operated in a two-electrode set-up. The electrolyte (0.1 M KOH) was pumped into a sapphire window at a constant flow rate of 5 ml min−1 by using a peristaltic pump over the cathode GDE, and the thickness of the electrolyte level on the cathode surface was 1.5 mm. CO2 was supplied to the back of the cathode GDE through a serpentine flow channel to guide the CO2 at a flow rate of 30 sccm, controlled by a mass flow controller (Alicat Scientific MC). Raman spectra were collected using an accumulation time of 4 s and an accumulation number of ten times using a WITEC confocal Raman microscope with a 50× objective and a 633 nm laser. The cell voltage was applied in potentiostatic mode and recorded without iR compensation.
In situ electrochemical XRD measurements
The customized spectro-electrochemical flow cell was employed to perform in situ XRD measurements in a two-electrode set-up. Ni felt was used as a counterelectrode, 0.1 M KOH was used as the electrolyte and CO2 (30 sccm) was supplied to the back of the cathode GDE. The in situ XRD patterns were collected on an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku SmartLab 9 kW, Advance) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at 45 kV and 200 mA. The single test time was about ~8 min in the 2θ range of 30–85°. The cell voltage was applied in potentiostatic mode and recorded without iR compensation.
In situ heating TEM measurements
In situ heating TEM measurements were performed on a JEOL JEM-2100F at 200 kV with a Fusion Select holder (Protochips) and a holey carbon-coated micro-electromechanical system E-chip (E-FHBC-10, Protochips).
Pb underpotential deposition measurements
The relative populations of the exposed facets of Cu were probed using Pb underpotential deposition measurements conducted in a three-electrode single-compartment cell. A graphite carbon rod and Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) were used as the counterelectrode and reference electrode, respectively. An L-type glassy-carbon electrode loaded with the sample with a diameter of 3 mm was employed as the working electrode. N2-purged 0.1 M KNO3 with 1 mM Pb(NO3)2 was added with HNO3 to adjust the pH to 1, used as the electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry at a sweep rate of 100 mV s−1 was used for measurements.
Temperature-programmed desorption measurements
Temperature-programmed desorption measurements of CO2 on samples were conducted by using an adsorption/desorption system. In a typical experiment, 1 cm2 GDE with a catalyst load of ~1 mg cm−2 was ground into powder that was then placed in a U-shaped quartz microreactor. Next, the outlet of the U-shaped quartz microreactor was connected to the GC device (GC-2014, Shimadzu) with a thermal conductivity detector. Afterwards, CO2 (40 sccm) was injected into the U-shaped quartz microreactor and kept flowing for 60 min, followed by flushing the sample using a He stream (40 sccm) until obtaining a stable baseline in GC. Temperature-programmed desorption measurements were then conducted from room temperature to 800/500 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C min−1, using GC to detect the CO2 desorbed from the sample surface.
DFT calculations
All DFT calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Program. The generalized gradient approximation with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof11 exchange–correlation functional was adopted to describe the electronic exchange and correlation interactions with a cut-off energy of 500 eV. The energy convergence criteria were set to 10−5 eV for self-consistent calculations, and the lattice parameters were optimized until the convergence tolerance of the force on each atom was smaller than 0.05 eV. A 4 × 4 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack k-point mesh was used for the Brillouin zone integration.
For perfect Cu, the copper crystal structure was optimized with a lattice constant of α = 3.636 Å. For Cu-SF, the unit cell was expanded by a factor of 1.1 and then fully relaxed until convergence. The lattice constant was determined to be 4.000 Å. Six-layer p(4 × 4) supercells of Cu(111) facet were used, with the lower three layers fixed. For all slab models, the vacuum thickness in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the catalyst was at least 15 Å to avoid attractions from adjacent periodic mirror images. At all intermediate states, two water molecules are added near the slab surface to consider the effect of solvation.
The Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of the reaction intermediates was defined as
where ΔE is the total energy difference, ΔZPE is the difference of the zero-point energy and TΔS is the difference of entropy. Note that E(H) is half of the H2(g) energy under 1.013 bar at 298.15 K, E(H2O) is the energy of H2O(g) under 0.035 bar at 298.15 K and E(OH) = E(H2O) − E(H). The zero-point energy and entropy were corrected by calculating the vibrational frequencies through density functional perturbation theory at 298.15 K.
Characterization
TEM images were collected on a JEOL JEM-2100F at 200 kV. Aberration-corrected HAADF-STEM images were collected on a TFS Spectra 300 at 300 kV. GPA analysis on atomic-resolution images was performed using Digital Micrograph software to derive the lattice strain. Only strain perpendicular to the stacking faults and twin boundaries was measured, using the lattice far from these defects as a reference (zero strain). Scanning electron microscopy images were taken on a field-emission Tescan MAIA3. The XRD patterns were recorded on a Rigaku SmartLab 9 kW Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). XPS spectra were collected on a Thermo Scientific Nexsa X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy using Al Kα radiation with C 1s (284.6 eV) as a reference. ICP-MS spectra were collected on an Agilent 7900. The hard X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements were conducted at beamline BL01C of the Synchrotron Radiation Research Center in Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Data availability
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).
Wakerley, D. et al. Gas diffusion electrodes, reactor designs and key metrics of low-temperature CO2 electrolysers. Nat. Energy 7, 130–143 (2022).
Mariano, R. G., McKelvey, K., White, H. S. & Kanan, M. W. Selective increase in CO2 electroreduction activity at grain-boundary surface terminations. Science 358, 1187–1192 (2017).
Xia, C. et al. Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices. Nat. Energy 4, 776–785 (2019).
Zhong, M. et al. Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 581, 178–183 (2020).
García de Arquer, F. P. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm−2. Science 367, 661–666 (2020).
Morales-Guio, C. G. et al. Improved CO2 reduction activity towards C2+ alcohols on a tandem gold on copper electrocatalyst. Nat. Catal. 1, 764–771 (2018).
She, X. J., Wang, Y. F., Xu, H., Tsang, S. C. E. & Lau, S. P. Challenges and opportunities of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to chemicals and fuels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 134, e202211396 (2022).
Monteiro, M. C. O. et al. Absence of CO2 electroreduction on copper, gold and silver electrodes without metal cations in solution. Nat. Catal. 4, 654–662 (2021).
Zhang, F. & Co, A. C. Direct evidence of local pH change and the role of alkali cation during CO2 electroreduction in aqueous media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 1674–1681 (2019).
Huang, J. E. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products in strong acid. Science 372, 1074–1078 (2021).
Yang, K. L. et al. Cation-driven increases of CO2 utilization in a bipolar membrane electrode assembly for CO2 electrolysis. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 4291–4298 (2021).
Endrődi, B. et al. Operando cathode activation with alkali metal cations for high current density operation of water-fed zero-gap carbon dioxide electrolysers. Nat. Energy 6, 439–448 (2021).
Liu, Z. C., Yang, H. Z., Kutz, R. & Masel, R. I. CO2 electrolysis to CO and O2 at high selectivity, stability and efficiency using sustainion membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, J3371 (2018).
Rabinowitz, J. A. & Kanan, M. W. The future of low-temperature carbon dioxide electrolysis depends on solving one basic problem. Nat. Commun. 11, 5231 (2020).
Ozden, A. et al. Cascade CO2 electroreduction enables efficient carbonate-free production of ethylene. Joule 5, 706–719 (2021).
Siritanaratkul, B. et al. Zero-gap bipolar membrane electrolyzer for carbon dioxide reduction using acid-tolerant molecular electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 7551–7556 (2022).
Gu, J. et al. Modulating electric field distribution by alkali cations for CO2 electroreduction in strongly acidic medium. Nat. Catal. 5, 268–276 (2022).
O’Brien, C. P. et al. Single pass CO2 conversion exceeding 85% in the electrosynthesis of multicarbon products via local CO2 regeneration. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 2952–2959 (2021).
Ovalle, V. J., Hsu, Y. S., Agrawal, N., Janik, M. J. & Waegele, M. M. Correlating hydration free energy and specific adsorption of alkali metal cations during CO2 electroreduction on Au. Nat. Catal. 5, 624–632 (2022).
Pribyl-Kranewitter, B., Beard, A., Schuler, T., Diklić, N. & Schmidt, T. J. Investigation and optimisation of operating conditions for low-temperature CO2 reduction to CO in a forward-bias bipolar-membrane electrolyser. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 043506 (2021).
Pătru, A., Binninger, T., Pribyl, B. & Schmidt, T. J. Design principles of bipolar electrochemical co-electrolysis cells for efficient reduction of carbon dioxide from gas phase at low temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, F34–F43 (2019).
Pärnamäe, R. et al. Bipolar membranes: a review on principles, latest developments, and applications. J. Membr. Sci. 617, 118538 (2021).
Oener, S. Z., Foster, M. J. & Boettcher, S. W. Accelerating water dissociation in bipolar membranes and for electrocatalysis. Science 369, 1099–1103 (2020).
Chen, L. H. K., Xu, Q. C., Oener, S. Z., Fabrizio, K. & Boettcher, S. W. Design principles for water dissociation catalysts in high-performance bipolar membranes. Nat. Commun. 13, 3846 (2022).
Xie, K. et al. Bipolar membrane electrolyzers enable high single-pass CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products. Nat. Commun. 13, 3609 (2022).
Li, W. Z. et al. Bifunctional ionomers for efficient co-electrolysis of CO2 and pure water towards ethylene production at industrial-scale current densities. Nat. Energy 7, 835–843 (2022).
Feng, X. F., Jiang, K. L., Fan, S. S. & Kanan, M. W. Grain-boundary-dependent CO2 electroreduction activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4606–4609 (2015).
Mariano, R. G. et al. Microstructural origin of locally enhanced CO2 electroreduction activity on gold. Nat. Mater. 20, 1000–1006 (2021).
Feng, X. F., Jiang, K. L., Fan, S. S. & Kanan, M. W. A direct grain-boundary-activity correlation for CO electroreduction on Cu nanoparticles. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 169–174 (2016).
Huang, W. X. et al. Steam-created grain boundaries for methane C–H activation in palladium catalysts. Science 373, 1518–1523 (2021).
Yin, Z. L. et al. An alkaline polymer electrolyte CO2 electrolyzer operated with pure water. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2455–2462 (2019).
Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).
She, X. J. et al. Tandem electrodes for carbon dioxide reduction into C2+ products at simultaneously high production efficiency and rate. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 1, 100051 (2020).
Chen, C. B. et al. Cu-Ag tandem catalysts for high-rate CO2 electrolysis toward multicarbons. Joule 4, 1688–1699 (2020).
Ramdin, M. et al. High pressure electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formic acid/formate: a comparison between bipolar membranes and cation exchange membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 1834–1847 (2019).
Kim, J. Y. T. et al. Recovering carbon losses in CO2 electrolysis using a solid electrolyte reactor. Nat. Catal. 5, 288–299 (2022).
Ma, M. et al. Insights into the carbon balance for CO2 electroreduction on Cu using gas diffusion electrode reactor designs. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 977–985 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Synchrotron Radiation Center, Hsinchu, Taiwan, for the use of beamline BL01C. We thank Arduino for open-source hardware and software. This work was financially supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (C5029-18E) and Hong Kong Polytechnic University (1-CD7U, 1-YXA0 and Q-CDAK) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22108109 and 22178152).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.P.L. supervised the project. X.S. and S.P.L. conceived the idea, designed all the electrolysis cells and performed catalyst synthesis, characterization, catalytic tests and data analysis. X.S. and L.Z. carried out all the electrochemical experiments. L.Z. carried out the DFT simulations. Y.W. contributed to the data analysis. P.X., T.-S.W. and M.M.-J.L. performed the coordination number and strain data analyses. M.C.W. and X.S. designed the circuit based on Arduino and wrote the program. Y.Z., Z.X. and X.G. performed the high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy measurements. H.L. and H.X. assisted with catalyst synthesis. X.S. wrote the paper. S.P.L., Y.W. and S.C.E.T. revised the paper. All authors discussed the results and assisted with the paper preparation.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
S.P.L. and X.S. have filed a US patent (application no. 17/806102) regarding the catalyst and the MEA architecture. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Energy thanks Yan Jiao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Table of Contents, Notes 1–6, Figs. 1–59, Tables 1 and 2 and References.
Supplementary Video 1
Changes in grain boundaries as a function of temperature.
Supplementary Video 2
Changes in stacking faults as a function of temperature.
Supplementary Data
Source data for supplementary figures.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 3
Source data for Fig. 3.
Source Data Fig. 4
Source data for Fig. 4.
Source Data Fig. 5
Source data for Fig. 5.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
She, X., Zhai, L., Wang, Y. et al. Pure-water-fed, electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to ethylene beyond 1,000 h stability at 10 A. Nat Energy 9, 81–91 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01415-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01415-4
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Efficient ethylene electrosynthesis through C–O cleavage promoted by water dissociation
Nature Synthesis (2024)
-
Stabilized Cu0 -Cu1+ dual sites in a cyanamide framework for selective CO2 electroreduction to ethylene
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Designing Membrane Electrode Assembly for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction: a Review
Transactions of Tianjin University (2024)
-
Manipulating local CO2/H2O ratio in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction toward multi-carbon product
Rare Metals (2024)