Abstract
We explore how crystallographic order and orientation affect the tribological (friction and wear) performance of gallium nitride (GaN), through experiments and theory. Friction and wear were measured in every direction on the c-plane of GaN through rotary wear experiment. This revealed a strong crystallographic orientation dependence of the sliding properties of GaN; a 60° periodicity of wear rate and friction coefficient was observed. The origin of this periodicity is rooted in the symmetry presented in wurtzite hexagonal lattice structure of III-nitrides. The lowest wear rate was found as 0.6 × 10−7 mm3/Nm with <1\(\bar{1}\)00>, while the wear rate associated with <1\(\bar{2}\)10> had the highest wear rate of 1.4 × 10−7 mm3/Nm. On the contrary, higher friction coefficient can be observed along <1\(\bar{1}\)00> while lower friction coefficient always appeared along <1\(\bar{2}\)10>. We developed a simple molecular statics approach to understand energy barriers associated with sliding and material removal; this calculated change of free energy associated with sliding revealed that there were smaller energy barriers sliding along <1\(\bar{2}\)10> as compared to the <1\(\bar{1}\)00> direction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Investigations of anisotropic tribological properties of crystal materials starting from 1960s and various crystal materials have been studied since then1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Bowden et al. observed that friction coefficient of MgO2 and diamond exhibited a 90° symmetry while with larger cone angles the friction coefficient decreased but the directionality was still preserved2,3. Similarly, Steijn concluded that friction and wear properties of single crystals with FCC and BCC structures, like copper, iron, NaCl, LiF, etc., depended on crystal orientation4. And for HCP crystal like sapphire, wear rate on basal plane along [\(\overline{1}\)\(\overline{1}\)20] was lower than [10\(\overline{1}\)0]5. After these pioneering works on anisotropic friction and wear properties, more efforts have been made in exploring directionality of tribological properties for various kind of materials8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. As wurtzite single crystal material, the anisotropic properties of GaN also have been studied for decades, such as Young’s modulus, hardness, shear strength, etc18,19,20,21. On the contrary, the tribological properties (friction and wear) of GaN haven’t been systematically investigated and fully understood yet. However, knowing its wear performance is critical for understanding its processing (e.g. chemical mechanical polishing)22,23,24,25 and machinability as well as the durability of GaN-based devices exposed to harsh environments, e.g., space and desert, as well as in high-frequency microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). Recently, we discovered that GaN has an ultralow wear nature under dry environment and its wear property depends on the crystal orientation, with wear rate along <1\(\overline{2}\)10> being significantly higher than <1\(\overline{1}\)00>26. Therefore, in order to link the crystal direction to the GaN wear and map the full orientation dependence of GaN wear rate, we employed a custom rotary tribometer to conduct unidirectional (clockwise and counter-clockwise) to include all the crystal directions. A molecular static model was built to calculate energetics of an idealized wear process. This model simulated the free energy variation when dragging wear cluster around the surface.
Results and Discussion
Wear
A circular wear scar was obtained by a unidirectional (clockwise) rotary sliding test after 30,000 cycles under 25–30% RH lab air. The flat edge of the sapphire substrate is the a-plane (1\(\overline{2}\)10) and is used as reference to determine the crystal direction in the wear scar. It is important to note that the lattice of GaN has a 30° rotation from sapphire substrate in order to minimize the strain27,28, this means that the flat edge corresponds to the m-plane (1\(\overline{1}\)00) of the GaN film. This has been independently confirmed with atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy and selected area diffraction. A point of clarification for comparison: prior studies on GaN wear labeled the sliding direction based on the sapphire substrate when comparing wear of sapphire to GaN films on sapphire26; in the present work, we define directions based on the structure of the GaN film.
GaN shows a 60° periodicity of wear rate on the c-plane (Fig. 1a), with the lowest wear rate at <1\(\bar{1}\)00> family direction (K<1\(\bar{1}\)00> = 6.7 × 10−8 mm3/Nm ± 0.92 × 10−8 mm3/Nm) and the highest wear rate at <1\(\bar{2}\)10> family direction (K<1\(\bar{2}\)10> = 14 × 10−8 mm3/Nm ± 2.7 × 10−8 mm3/Nm). Profilometric scans were made every 3° along this circular wear scar revealed a continuous variation of wear rate with orientation. This periodic crystallographic dependent wear behavior matches with what we reported previously that <1\(\overline{1}\)00> direction was more wear resistant than <1\(\overline{2}\)10> direction26. The inconsistency of the wear rate within same family direction is either attributed to the local quality of the GaN sample or a possible asymmetric within the same family direction. In order to answer this question, another unidirectional wear test with reverse sliding direction (counter-clockwise) was made on the same coating 0.5 mm away from the first unidirectional test. This is to guarantee a comparable local sample quality and allow us to differentiate the possible asymmetric wear behavior within same family direction. As plotted in Fig. 1b, we can see that the wear rate was very close to the first test with only limited increase of wear rate for all directions.
Friction
The friction coefficient of GaN also exhibited 60° periodicity, having its lowest value along <1\(\overline{2}\)10> and highest along <1\(\overline{1}\)00> (Fig. 2), except for the region around starting point of the test, which was attributed to the discontinuity of the stage near this point (acceleration and deceleration of each cycle). This periodicity does not come from variation in the normal load, which, for this experiment, typically has a ±7 mN (less than 2%) variation with periodicity of 360°, caused by slight misalignments; the friction coefficient is normalized as the instantaneous friction force divided by the instantaneous normal force. We hypothesize that a possible anisotropic energy barrier distribution is presented on the surface, which is caused by the intrinsic lattice structure of GaN.
Molecular Statics
Unlike prior results for frictional and wear anisotropy2,3,5, GaN is under a very mild wear regime and plasticity is not expected to contribute. As previously reported, height removal rates for GaN are as low as ~0.0007 nm per sliding cycle26. To explain this, we propose a mental framework that considers the removal/sliding of a small, charge balanced GaN cluster. We hypothesize that higher energy barrier along <0\(\overline{1}\)00> direction results in more difficult removal process of the material, which in turn results in its lower wear rate. The anisotropy of friction coefficient is much more subtle than the anisotropy of wear rate. The anisotropy in friction likely comes from the same or similar energetic barriers derived from crystalline structure that governs wear.
To test this hypothesis, we employed molecular static calculation to understand the physics of crystal orientation dependence of wear. For simplicity, we only considered wear as the internal bond breaking within the GaN surface. Thus, only GaN-GaN interface will be simulated. Although, this model is simplified and does not strictly correspond to the complexity of the experiment, the energy barrier distribution can be used to correlate with the anisotropy of GaN’s wear performance. Simulations start with a base of GaN consisting of 54,000 Ga and 54,000 N atoms. A small cluster of 6 Ga atoms and 6 N atoms was extracted from the center of the top surface of the base and moved up 5.166 Å (Fig. 3a), at a location in registry with the GaN crystal. The reference total energy of the system was first determined when the wear cluster was placed right above the hole it left behind at a distance in registry with the base. This total energy was obtained by summing all energy potentials between each cluster atom and every atom in the base (sum of 1,295,856 potentials for each iteration). The twelve-atom “wear” cluster was then “slid” radially from the center in 0.0795 Å incremental steps out to 31.8 Å (400 steps for 10 lattice spacings from the origin). The radial sweeps started at [\(\overline{1}\)2\(\overline{1}\)0] and were done at all angles along the surface, in 1 degree increments. The total energy for each location is calculated. A two-body potential was used to obtain the interaction between Ga-Ga, Ga-N and N-N29. The variation of total energy associating with cluster in different places along different crystal direction then was revealed.
The molecular static simulation results revealed 60° periodicity on c-plane surface, with energetic barriers to sliding strongly linked to the sliding direction. This supports our hypothesis that the crystallographic orientation dependences of wear rate is attributed to the anisotropic energy barrier distribution on the c-plane surface of GaN. From Fig. 4, we can see that there are less energy barriers along <1\(\bar{2}\)10> family direction while more energy barriers along <1\(\overline{1}\)00> family direction. This indicates that more work is required to overcome the energy barriers along the <1\(\overline{1}\)00> direction, resulting in lower wear rate. On the contrary, less energy barriers make the wear cluster more free to pass along the <1\(\overline{2}\)10> direction, leading to increased wear rate in this direction (Fig. 4a). We also plot the energy variations along specific crystallographic directions (Fig. 4b). Higher energy barrier height in <1\(\overline{1}\)00> than in <1\(\overline{2}\)10> means it is more difficult to drag a wear cluster along <1\(\overline{1}\)00> family direction, again demonstrating that <1\(\overline{1}\)00> family direction has a lower wear rate than <1\(\overline{2}\)10>. It is also noteworthy that the crystal structure along <1\(\overline{2}\)10> family direction strictly repeats every 60° while the crystal structure in <1\(\overline{1}\)00> is exact the same every 120°, but varies a little every 60° (Fig. 4b). To specify this point, we looked into the crystal structure of GaN (Fig. 3) and saw that when moving along [1\(\overline{1}\)00] direction, the wear cluster will approach one Ga atom first and split two other N atoms afterwards. On the contrary, when moving along [\(\overline{1}\)100] (the opposite direction) the wear cluster will split two N atoms first then approach the next Ga atom. This slight difference is due to wurtzite layers cycling among two equivalent shifted layers; we suspect that there is no anisotropy in wear between these two directions, as this effect is averaged out as the material is worn through multiple layers. Theoretically speaking, this anisotropy in <1\(\overline{1}\)00> family direction could exist instantaneously and in atomic-scale wear events and experiments. However, it is important to note that the wear behavior of GaN is influenced not only by crystal orientation, but also highly depends on the humidity, as well as the local sample quality, which makes it extremely difficult to demonstrate this theoretical calculation with macroscale wear test.
Conclusions
To conclude, we explored the full map of crystallographic orientation dependence of GaN’s wear behavior by means of both experimental and computational methods. This demonstration of the crystallographic orientation wear dependence of GaN provides the further understanding beyond our initial discovery on the low wear rate of this material. From the experimental results, we can observe that wear performance of GaN exhibits a strong directionality with a periodicity of 60°, with local lowest always appeared in <1\(\overline{1}\)00> family direction and local highest wear rate in <1\(\overline{2}\)10> family direction. Molecular static simulation helps us to explain the physics behind crystallographic dependence. Higher energy barrier density and height along <1\(\overline{1}\)00> family direction than in <1\(\overline{2}\)10> require more work to move around the wear cluster, which in turn explains the reason why <1\(\overline{2}\)10> family direction has higher wear rate than <1\(\overline{1}\)00> family direction. Consequently, the current finding provides further insight into crystallographic orientation dependence of wear behavior of GaN and benefits the GaN society during device designs and applications.
Materials and Methods
Unintentionally doped single crystal (0001)-plane GaN coating (3 µm thick, grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition on c-plane single crystalline sapphire) was used in these experiments. The as-grown u-GaN sample has background doping (n-type) of n ~ 5×1016 cm−3. The rotary wear tests were performed by our custom rotary tribometer (Fig. 5a) mounted inside a glovebox to achieve the environment control (25–30% RH lab air). Two force transducers attached to the flexure were used to measure the normal and frictional forces. The linear sliding speed was set to be 20 mm/s and the sliding cycles was 30,000. A single crystal ruby ball (α-alumina) with radius of 1.5 mm (Swiss Jewel Company, Grade 25) was used as the countersample due to its hardness and wear resistance. The applied normal load was set to be 600mN (~1.2 GPa maximum Hertzian contact pressure, approximately 1/10 of the hardness of GaN30,31,32,33,34). The rotary wear test was first performed in a unidirectional (clockwise) manner for obtaining the wear rate corresponding to each crystal direction (Fig. 5b), then a second unidirectional rotary was conducted with reversal direction, in order to distinguish the symmetry of wear behavior of wurtzite GaN. Optical profilometer (Bruker ContourGT-K) was used to measure the cross-sectional area of the wear scar. The rotary stage carrying the sample was placed underneath the profilometer for wear scar profile measurement (Fig. 5b). The stage rotation step of 3° was used to achieve a full profilometric scan. Then Archard wear rate was used for deriving the wear rate35. Five line scans within each single profilometric scan were made to get data that is statistically representative of the local material wear properties36.
Change history
02 February 2018
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.
References
Buckley, D. H. & Miyoshi, K. Friction and wear of ceramics. Wear 100, 333–353 (1984).
Bowden, F. P., Brookes, C. A. & Hanwell, A. E. Anisotropy of Friction in Crystals. Nature 203, 27–30 (1964).
Bowden, F. P. & Brookes, C. A. Frictional anisotropy in nonmetallic crystals. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 295, 244–258 (1966).
Steijn, R. P. Friction and Wear of Single Crystals. Wear 7, 48–66 (1964).
Steijn, R. P. On the wear of sapphire. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1951–1958 (1961).
Sawyer, W. G., Argibay, N., Burris, D. L. & Krick, B. A. Mechanistic Studies in Friction and Wear of Bulk Materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 395–427 (2014).
Duwell, E. J. Friction and wear of single-crystal sapphire sliding on steel. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 2691–2698 (1962).
El-Hadad, S., Sato, H. & Watanabe, Y. Investigation of wear anisotropy in a severely deformed Al–Al3Ti composite. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 43, 3249–3256 (2012).
Gatzen, H. H. & Beck, M. Investigations on the friction force anisotropy of the silicon lattice. Wear 254, 1122–1126 (2003).
Kadijk, S. E. & Groenou, A. B. V. A. N. Wear anisotropy of MnZn ferrite part I: recorder and sphere-on-tape experiments. Wear 139, 93–113 (1990).
Liley, M. Friction Anisotropy and Asymmetry of a Compliant Monolayer Induced by a Small Molecular Tilt. Science (80-.). 280, 273–275 (1998).
Miyoshi, K. & Buckley, D. H. Anisotropic tribological properties of SiC. Wear 75, 253–268 (1982).
Namai, Y. & Shindo, H. Frictional force microscopic anisotropy on (001) surfaces of alkali halides and MgO. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 4497–4500 (2000).
Park, J. Y. et al. High frictional anisotropy of periodic and aperiodic directions on a quasicrystal surface. Science 309, 1354–1356 (2005).
Pastewka, L., Moser, S., Gumbsch, P. & Moseler, M. Anisotropic mechanical amorphization drives wear in diamond. Nat. Mater. 10, 34–38 (2011).
Stempfle, P. & Takadoum, J. Multi-asperity nanotribological behavior of single-crystal silicon: Crystallography-induced anisotropy in friction and wear. Tribol. Int. 48, 35–43 (2012).
Yu, B. & Qian, L. Effect of crystal plane orientation on the friction-induced nanofabrication on monocrystalline silicon. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 137–144 (2013).
Fujikane, M., Yokogawa, T., Nagao, S. & Nowak, R. Nanoindentation study on insight of plasticity related to dislocation density and crystal orientation in GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 (2012).
Kisielowski, C. et al. Strain-related phenomena in GaN thin films. Phys. Rev. B 54, 17745–17753 (1996).
Moram, M. A. & Vickers, M. E. X-ray diffraction of III-nitrides. Reports Prog. Phys. 72, 36502 (2009).
Savastenko, V. A. & Sheleg, A. U. Study of the elastic properties of gallium nitride. Phys. Status Solidi 48, K135–K139 (1978).
Tavernier, P. R., Margalith, T., Coldren, L. A., DenBaars, S. P. & Clarke, D. R. Chemical Mechanical Polishing of Gallium Nitride. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 5, G61 (2002).
Weyher, J. L., Müller, S., Grzegory, I. & Porowski, S. Chemical polishing of bulk and epitaxial GaN. J. Cryst. Growth 182, 17–22 (1997).
Aida, H. et al. Surface Planarization of GaN-on-Sapphire Template by Chemical Mechanical Polishing for Subsequent GaN Homoepitaxy. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 3, P163–P168 (2014).
Hayashi, S., Koga, T. & Goorsky, M. S. Chemical Mechanical Polishing of GaN. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, H113 (2008).
Zeng, G., Tan, C. K., Tansu, N. & Krick, B. A. Ultralow wear gallium nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 51602 (2016).
Akasaka, T., Kobayashi, Y., Ando, S. & Kobayashi, N. GaN hexagonal microprisms with smooth vertical facets fabricated by selective metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2196–2198 (1997).
Grandjean, N., Massies, J. & Leroux, M. Nitridation of sapphire. Effect on the optical properties of GaN epitaxial overlayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2071–2073 (1996).
Harafuji, K., Tsuchiya, T. & Kawamura, K. Molecular dynamics simulation for evaluating melting point of wurtzite-type GaN crystal. J. Appl. Phys. 96, 2501–2512 (2004).
Yang, Z. et al. Mechanical characterization of suspended GaN microstructures fabricated by GaN-on-patterned-silicon technique. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 1–3 (2006).
Tsai, C. H., Jian, S. R. & Juang, J. Y. Berkovich nanoindentation and deformation mechanisms in GaN thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 1997–2002 (2008).
Nowak, R. et al. Elastic and plastic properties of GaN determined by nano-indentation of bulk crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2070 (1999).
Drory, M. D., Ager, J. W., Suski, T., Grzegory, I. & Porowski, S. Hardness and fracture toughness of bulk single crystal gallium nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 4044 (1996).
Kucheyev, S. O. et al. Nanoindentation of epitaxial GaN films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3373 (2000).
Erickson, G. M. et al. Paleo-tribology: development of wear measurement techniques and a three-dimensional model revealing how grinding dentitions self-wear to enable functionality. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 4, 1–12 (2016).
Colbert, R. S. et al. Uncertainty in Pin-on-Disk Wear Volume Measurements Using Surface Scanning Techniques. Tribol. Lett. 42, 129–131 (2011).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Nicholas Strandwitz, Chee-Keong Tanand Edmund Webb for their thoughtful comments and insight. The authors would like to thank John Curry and Mark Sidebottom for their kindly helps and discussion in experiment setup and design. The supports of the US National Science Foundation [CMMI 1538125] (G.Z. and B.K.), Lehigh University Doctoral Fellowship (G.Z.) and The E. Elmer Klaus Fellowship (G.Z.) are also appreciated. The sample preparation was supported by the US National Science Foundation [ECCS 1408051 and DMR 1505122] (W.S. and N.T.), and the Daniel E. ‘39 and Patricia M. Smith Endowed Chair Professorship Fund (N.T.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.Z., B.A.K. and N.T. contributed to the initial concept development, discussions, experimental design, analysis of the results, and writing of the manuscript. G.Z. and B.A.K. contributed to tribological tests and modeling, and W.S., R.S. and N.T. contributed to the sample preparations. All the authors contributed to technical discussions of the tribological behavior analysis for the manuscript. B.A.K. and N.T. supervised the studies performed in the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Change History
Change History: A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19513-9.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, G., Sun, W., Song, R. et al. Crystal Orientation Dependence of Gallium Nitride Wear. Sci Rep 7, 14126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14234-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14234-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Crystallographic orientation dependence on nanoscale friction behavior of energetic β-HMX crystal
Friction (2023)
-
Mechanochemical reactions of GaN-Al2O3 interface at the nanoasperity contact: Roles of crystallographic polarity and ambient humidity
Friction (2022)
-
Development of a photoelectrochemically self-improving Si/GaN photocathode for efficient and durable H2 production
Nature Materials (2021)