Abstract
Cytokinesis is a final step in cell division. Dictyostelium cells, a model organism for the study of cytokinesis, have multiple modes, denoted cytokinesis A, B, C, and D. All these modes have been mainly investigated using cells adhering to the substratum although they can grow in shaking suspension culture. Here, we observed how cells divide without adhering to the substratum using a new non-adhesive material. These detached cells formed the cleavage furrow but eventually failed in the final abscission. Thus, the cells cannot divide without adhesion, suggesting that they cannot divide only through the conventional cytokinesis A. However, in a long-term culture, the detached cells adhered each other to form multicellular aggregates and divided properly in these aggregates. Myosin II-null cells also formed such aggregates but could not divide in the aggregates. Several lines of experiments using mutant cells showed that the process of cytokinesis in multicellular aggregates is a novel mode utilizing a confined space in the aggregate in a myosin II-dependent manner. These results shed light on a poorly characterized mechanism of cytokinesis in multicellular spheroids or tissues. We propose to redefine and classify multiple modes of cytokinesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cytokinesis is the final step in cell division and involves the division of the cytoplasm of the parental cell into two daughter cells. Cytokinesis failure results in the multinucleation of cells and often causes tumors or cancers in the human body1,2. In animal cells and lower organisms, such as Dictyostelium cells, constriction of the contractile ring, which is mainly composed of actin and myosin filaments, has been considered to pinch the cell into two3,4. Previous studies have elucidated the existence of several different cytokinesis mechanisms from this ‘purse string model’. Myosin II-null Dictyostelium cells cannot actively constrict the cleavage furrow and thus become multinucleated in shaking culture. However, these cells can divide on the substratum after adhesion, and this process has been termed “attachment-assisted mitotic cleavage”5. More recently, the conventional process of cytokinesis in wild-type cells was denoted “cytokinesis A”, and that of myosin II-null cells was termed “cytokinesis B”6.
The placement of large multinucleated myosin II-null cells, which were generated by culturing in suspension, on a substratum results in their adherence to the substratum and subsequent division into multiple fragments, finally each containing one nucleus; this process is called “traction-mediated cytofission”7. This cytofission occurs in a manner unrelated to cell cycle progression; in fact, these multinucleated cells often divide during interphase. This process was later termed “cytokinesis C” to distinguish it from cytokinesis A and B8. Recent studies have provided increasing evidence that higher-animal cells can divide also by cytokinesis B and C9,10.
In addition to cytokinesis A, B, and C, a novel mode (cytokinesis D) was identified in Entamoeba cells; these cells have been found to divide with assistance from neighbor cells, which act as midwifes11. Dividing cells emit a chemoattractant to attract neighboring cells from the equatorial region, and this chemoattractant induces the neighboring cells to move over the cleavage furrow to aid the scission process. The cytokinesis D process of Dictyostelium cells has been reported to require the ß-subunit of trimeric G proteins, which is essential for chemotaxis12.
In previous studies, cytokinesis has been mainly observed in cells adhering to the substratum. In contrast, unanchored fibroblasts cannot complete cytokinesis13. Dictyostelium mutants deficient in talin, paxillin, vinculin or sadA, which show defects in cell-substratum adhesion, frequently fail in cytokinesis14,15,16,17, suggesting the importance of adhesion during cell division.
In this study, we made the substratum surface non-adhesive using a new coating material to observe how cells divide without adhesion to the substratum. Surprisingly, these detached cells formed the cleavage furrow but ultimately failed to separate and became multinucleated, suggesting that they cannot divide only through the conventional cytokinesis A without adhering to the substratum. Interestingly, the long-term culture of these cells in this “detached condition” resulted in the formation of multicellular aggregates. These cells could divide normally in these aggregates and multiply at a rate similar to those on the substratum. From several lines of experiments using mutant cells, we concluded that the process of cell division in multicellular aggregates is a novel mode for cytokinesis. These results shed light on a poorly characterized mechanism of cytokinesis in multicellular spheroids or tissues. Finally, we proposed to redefine and classify multiple modes of cytokinesis.
Results
Cells cannot divide without adhering to the substratum
To examine how cells divide without adhering to the substratum, the coverslip was coated with Lipidure, a new non-adhesive coating material, which has the same structure as the phosphatidylcholine polar bases that form the cell membrane18. The placement of Dictyostelium cells on the coated coverslip resulted in none of the cells adhering to the coverslip. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the coating, 20 minutes after the cells were placed and settled on the coated coverslip, all of the cells were washed off by mildly exchanging the medium (right panels in Fig. 1A). In contrast, most of the cells remained on the non-coated coverslip after the medium was exchanged (left panels in Fig. 1A).
Dividing cells were observed under this “detached condition”. Although the position of the cells always changed due to Brownian motion, the cells could not migrate but did change their shape by extending pseudopods. The cells became spherical at the beginning of the mitotic phase, formed the cleavage furrow, and constricted it. However, all of observed cells failed in the final abscission (three right columns in Fig. 1B, n = 55). In contrast, all of observed cells on the non-coated substratum successfully underwent cell division (left column in Fig. 1B, n = 55). Figure 1C shows a typical failure in cytokinesis of a cell expressing GFP-histone, a marker of nucleus, on the coated substratum. The cell finally became binucleated, suggesting proper occurrence of the nuclear division. Cells cultured on a coverslip coated with poly-HEMA, another non-adhesive coating material, resulted in a similar failure in cytokinesis as those cultured on the Lipidure-coated coverslip.
Together, the results demonstrate that Dictyostelium cells cannot divide without adhering to the substratum. Although they have been thought to divide only by cytokinesis A in suspension culture, they must need an additional mechanism for abscission.
Cells can divide in multicellular aggregates
When cells were cultured in a Lipidure-coated plastic dish, they gradually adhered each other, resulting in the formation of multicellular aggregates within 1–2 h (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Video S1). To the best of our knowledge, this process has not been reported previously. Interestingly, the cells could multiply in the aggregates, because their growth rate was almost equal to that of cells cultured adhering to the substratum or in shaking condition (Fig. 2B). This finding also suggests that Lipidure coat does not have any harmful effect on cell division and growth. To examine the number of nuclei in each cell, the cells were fixed and stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Most of the cells had a single nucleus, suggesting that the cells divide properly in the multicellular aggregates (Figs 2D and 3B). Cells that were cultured adhering to the non-coated substratum, which served as a control, also had single nuclei (Fig. 2C). Placement of the multicellular aggregate on a non-coated coverslip resulted in the dispersion of the aggregate into individual migrating cells within 10 min (Supplementary Fig. S1), suggesting that the aggregate is not formed by directly connecting each of the cells by Lipidure, which might be released from the coated substratum.
To examine whether cells become multinucleated when the formation of the multicellular aggregate was inhibited in long-term culture, the cells were cultured in the coated dish with medium containing methyl cellulose (MC) to increase the viscosity of the culture medium, which resulted in significant suppression of Brownian motion and thereby reduced cell aggregation (Supplementary Fig. S2A). In another study, mutant cells deficient in three genes encoding cell-cell adhesion contact site B (csB) proteins (csbA, csbB, and csbC)19 were cultured in the coated dish. The formation of cell aggregates was significantly suppressed (Supplementary Fig. S2B). Supplementary Fig. S2C,D show typical DAPI-stained fluorescence images showing that the cells became severely multinucleated in both cases. Figure 3A shows the growth curves of wild-type cells (AX2) on the coated and non-coated surface in the presence and absence of MC. Their growth on the coated surface was significantly suppressed in the presence of MC compared with on non-coated surface. Figure 3C shows the growth curves of csB-triple-mutant cells on the non-coated and coated surface. Their growth was also significantly suppressed on the coated surface. Figure 3B,D show a summary of multinucleation in different conditions. In both conditions aiming to reduce cell aggregation (in the presence of MC or using csB-mutant cells), the cells became multinucleated. In the presence of MC, the csB-mutant cells became more severely multinucleated (Fig. 3D).
Together, wild-type cells cannot divide without adhering to the substratum and can divide at a proper rate if they form multicellular aggregates.
Mode of cytokinesis in multicellular aggregates
Several modes of cytokinesis in addition to cytokinesis A, specifically cytokinesis B, C, and D, have been reported in Dictyostelium cells. The mode of cytokinesis that contributes to cytokinesis in multicellular aggregates was subsequently examined. One possible and simple explanation for cytokinesis in multicellular aggregates is that cells exert traction force against the surface of other cells instead of the substratum in a manner similar to cytokinesis B and C. Cytokinesis B and C do not require myosin II. The culture of myosin II-null cells (HS1) in a Lipidure-coated dish resulted in the formation of multicellular aggregates, similar to the effect on wild-type cells (Supplementary Fig. S3A,B). However, the cell growth was significantly suppressed and they became multinucleated in the aggregates (Fig. 3E,F), suggesting that myosin II is required for cytokinesis in multicellular aggregates. Thus, the mode of cytokinesis in aggregates cannot be explained by cytokinesis B or C, which are independent of myosin II.
Another possibility is that other cells are attracted by chemotaxis to the cleavage furrow and aid the process of cell division by crossing over the furrow (cytokinesis D). Nagasaki and Uyeda (2008) previously reported that cells deficient in the ß-subunit of trimeric G protein (Gß-null cells) show a significantly reduced rate of cytokinesis D (approximately 84% reduction)12. The culture of Gß-null cells in the Lipidure-coated dish resulted in the formation of multicellular aggregates, similar to wild-type cells (Supplementary Fig. S3C,D), and normal cell growth without a severe deficiency in cytokinesis in the aggregates (Fig. 3G,H), suggesting that the mode of cytokinesis in the aggregates does not depend on cytokinesis D.
Together, these results show that the cytokinesis in multicellular aggregates is a novel mode of cytokinesis that is dependent on myosin II.
Observation of cell division in multicellular aggregates
The above-mentioned observations show that cells can divide as long as they adhere to other cells, even when detached from the substratum. However, the adherence of a dividing cell to a single cell resulted in a failure in cytokinesis (Fig. 4A). How many cells are required for the cytokinesis in the aggregate? Fig. 4B shows a summary of the frequency of successfully completed cell division depending on the number of cells in the aggregate, suggesting that at least more than 9–10 cells is required for the successful cytokinesis. Presumably, the cells need to be surrounded by several cells to divide.
To directly observe the process of cell division in multicellular aggregates, cells simultaneously expressing GFP-myosin II and GFP-histone were mixed with cells not expressing GFP-fusion proteins at a ratio of 1:100. The fluorescence images were acquired by z-sectioning at 1-μm intervals over time under a sectioning fluorescence microscope, and three-dimensional images were reconstituted (Fig. 4C). The dividing cells in the multicellular aggregates finally succeeded in cytokinesis after nucleus division. Note that myosin II accumulated in the furrow region (arrows in Fig. 4C).
As described in the previous section, the experiments using myosin II null (HS1) cells showed that the cytokinesis in multicellular aggregates requires myosin II. The cells surrounding the dividing cell might require myosin II to provide pressing or pushing power to the diving cells to aid cell division. To clarify this point, wild-type cells simultaneously expressing GFP-myosin II and GFP-histone were mixed with HS1 cells not expressing GFP-fusion proteins at a ratio of 1:100 (Fig. 4D). In aggregates with HS1 cells, wild-type cells could complete cytokinesis. We confirmed the same results in multiple experiments (n = 24). Therefore, myosin II is required in the dividing cell but not in the surrounding cells for the successful cytokinesis.
Cells can divide in a confined environment without any specific adhesion
How do cells divide in multicellular aggregates? Recent studies have shown that animal cells migrate in a different mode in a 3D confined environment20. For example, glioma cells migrate independently of myosin II on a two-dimensional surface, but myosin II is required for squeezing the cell body through a densely packed 3D microenvironment to invade in the brain21. Integrin-deficient leukocytes cannot adhere to the substrate but can migrate in a 3D collagen gel22. Carcinomsarcoma (Walker 256) deficient in substratum-attachments cannot migrate on a 2D surface but can migrate using friction in a confined environment, such as that observed in a microfluidic chamber23.
To investigate whether cells can divide utilizing the confined space of a multicellular aggregate, the confined environment was mimicked by placing cells between two Lipidure-coated coverslips. The width (depth) between the two coverslips was set by mixing the cells with microspheres of one of indicated sizes (3, 4.5, 6, or 10 µm in diameter) for spacer (Fig. 5A). Incidentally, the average cell diameter found when the cells became spherical during the mitotic phase was approximately 9–10 µm. Interestingly, wild-type cells (WT) could divide in the confined space. Most of the flattened cells with a width of 3 µm completed cell division, but those with a width of 6 µm presented a failure in cytokinesis (Fig. 5B). Figure 5C shows a summary of frequency of successfully completed cell division in space with various widths, indicating that cells can complete cell division in the confined space. In contrast, myosin II-null cells (HS1) always failed in cytokinesis, even in a 3-µm-wide space (n = 20, Fig. 5D). Placement of HS1 cells expressing GFP-myosin II in the confined space confirmed that myosin II accumulated in the furrow region (n = 20, Fig. 5E).
It appears likely that cells can divide utilizing confined environments within the multicellular aggregates, maybe by a friction-mediated mechanism, similar to the cells in a confined space between the coverslips.
Shearing force is required for cell division in shaking culture
Dictyostelium cells can be cultured in shaking conditions as well as adhering to the surface of culture dishes. As described above, because the cells cannot divide without adhering to the substratum, the shearing force in shaking culture might aid cell division. To confirm this possibility, the cells were cultured at different shaking speeds. Incidentally, in the standard cell culture protocol used in our laboratory, the shaking speed is set to 150 rpm. Figure 6A shows the degree of cell aggregation observed at different shaking speeds (rpm), which indicates that the aggregate size is decreased and that most of the cells were separated at speeds higher than 100 rpm. Figure 6B shows a summary of the number of nuclei in the cells observed at different shaking speeds. At a lower speed (<60 rpm), the cells formed multicellular aggregates and remained mononucleated. At a moderate speed (100 rpm), most of the cells were separated and became multinucleated (51.3 ± 7.2%, n = 1,500 cells), whereas at the standard speed (150 rpm) and above, all of the cells were separated and showed less multinucleation (~20%). From these results, we conclude that the shearing force exerted by shaking aids cell division in shaking culture at the standard speed.
Discussion
Cytokinesis A (purse-string model) in animal cells and lower organisms, such as Dictyostelium cells, has been considered a robust and common mechanism for the division of a mother cell into two daughter cells. The present study revealed that Dictyostelium cells cannot divide only by the conventional cytokinesis A. In the final step of cytokinesis, the connection between two daughters of a dividing Dictyostelium cell have no special structure, such as the ‘midbody’, which is known as a machinery for the final abscission in higher-animal dividing cells. Recent intensive studies have indicated that many components, such as Arf/Rab small GTPases, SNARE proteins, ESCRT-III, and membrane vesicles, accumulate at the midbody to form the abscission machinery in animal cells24,25,26. The reason why Dictyostelium cells cannot divide without adhering to the substratum might simply be the absence of a midbody. Instead, Dictyostelium cells might have multiple modes of cytokinesis, including the mode discovered in the present study. These cells might not acquire or lack the midbody-dependent abscission mechanism during their evolutionary history. However, the midbody is not essential for Caenorhabditis elegans, although it appears at the final abscission27. Unanchored human fibroblasts cannot complete cytokinesis even though they have a midbody13. In addition, recent studies have shown that some animal cells can also divide by contractile ring-independent cytokinesis10,28,29,30, suggesting that animal cells might have many modes of cytokinesis, similarly to Dictyostelium cells.
Previously, adhesions of Dictyostelium cells to the substratum coated with various materials have been investigated, showing that cell adhesion occurs on both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surface31,32. Zang et al.6 used a silane-based hydrophobic substratum and showed that wild-type cells but not myosin II-null cells can divide normally. We prepared non-adhesive substratum according to their reported method but found that the cells were mostly detached but sometimes adhered to the surface. Other previous experiments mimicking suspension conditions, i.e., Dictyostelium cells were suspended in the bottom of a droplet hanging from a coverslip6 or embedded in soft agar33, showed that wild-type cells but not myosin II-null cells can divide successfully. Dictyostelium cells as well as neutrophils can swim in viscous medium such as Ficoll34. Presumably, the matrix of soft agar or the high viscosity of Ficoll might provide some scaffolds for the cells to divide or swim. However, as observed in the present study, these cells could neither divide nor swim in low-viscosity medium without adhesion to the substratum. Interestingly, the cells can still extend pseudopods even though they cannot advance in the absence of scaffolds. It has become clear that cells can extend pseudopods without any scaffolds and cues, a topic that has been controversial35.
As mentioned in the Introduction, cell-substratum-adhesion mutants, such as talin-, vinculin-, sadA- and paxillin-null Dictyostelium cells, showed defects in cytokinesis. It is highly likely that they have defects in cytokinesis for the same reason as wild type cells on Lipidure-coated substratum.
On the substratum, in addition to constriction of the contractile ring, wild-type cells may require a traction force against the substratum for the final separation, similarly to the process of cytokinesis B. MiDASes (mitosis-specific dynamic actin structures), which appear underneath two daughter nuclei in dividing cells, play an important role in cell-substratum adhesion, particularly in cytokinesis B. However, MiDASes appear within a short time, even in wild-type cells36, indicating that wild-type cells simultaneously need and use cytokinesis B (traction force mechanism). Furthermore, traction force microscopy has shown that wild-type cells exert a traction force in the inward direction from the poles37,38. In suspension culture, we found that cells require an external shearing force introduced by shaking for the final separation. Otherwise, these cells need to form multicellular aggregates to complete cell division.
What is the mechanism of cytokinesis in the multicellular aggregates identified in the present study? Because this mode of cytokinesis depends on myosin II, we can exclude the hypothesis that cells divide by exerting a traction force against the surface of neighbor cells instead of the substratum in a similar manner to that found in cytokinesis B and C because these modes are independent of myosin II. However, at present, there still remains a possibility that this traction force-mediated mechanism is not sufficient but partially contributes to the cytokinesis in the multicellular aggregate. Cytokinesis D is also excluded because the chemotaxis-deficient mutant exhibited normal division in the aggregates. The midwife mechanism might still function without chemotaxis because the random movements of neighbor cells might accidentally aid the final abscission of the thin connection between the two daughter cells in a crowded and compacted multicellular aggregate, but this mechanism might be too unreliable and inefficient for the division of almost all of the cells in the aggregates. Together, the cells must divide through an additional and novel mode of cytokinesis in the aggregates.
The dividing cells could not complete cytokinesis by adhering to only a single cell (Fig. 4A). Instead, to complete cell division, at least 9–10 cells in the aggregates are required. Therefore, we propose that cells divide using friction in the confined environment found in multicellular aggregates as they divide in a confined space between two coverslips. To utilize friction in a confined space, the dividing cells have to move inside the aggregate. Because our observations show that the cells always change their position in the aggregate, the dividing cells may move inside the aggregates by chance or through an unknown mechanism.
The novel mode of cytokinesis requires myosin II. The results of our experiments show that wild-type cells can divide in aggregates composed of HS1 cells and that myosin II is required in the dividing cells but not in the peripheral cells (Fig. 4D). Pressing of the cells with an agar block resulted in increased accumulation of myosin II at the cleavage furrow than observed in the absence of the agar block39,40. Myosin II might contribute to the exertion of more force for efficient cytokinesis by accumulating at a higher level at the cleavage furrow. However, there was no apparent higher level of accumulation of myosin II at the cleavage furrow in confined conditions compared with normal conditions (Fig. 5E). Myosin II may accumulate under a constant pressure of agar-overlay but not in the confined conditions, where the height of the space is fixed. As another explanation of the contribution of myosin II to the cell division in the aggregate, myosin II might contribute to the friction-mediated movements of the daughter cells in opposite directions. The observation that after completing cell division, each daughter cell can migrate in the confined space (Fig. 5B) supports this idea. Further experiments are needed to clarify the molecular mechanism of friction-mediated cytokinesis, and investigate the role of myosin II on it.
Some animal cells are able to make multicellular aggregates (spheroids) in suspension culture. Spheroids are used as biological models of native tissue, and the environment within spheroids is considered a more physiological condition. The cells can divide and multiply in spheroids, but there is no information regarding the mode of cytokinesis discussed in this study. Recent studies have shown that cell division in tissue is very different from that which occurs in the 2D condition. In the Drosophila pupal notum, neighboring interphase cells are pulled by the formation of the furrow of the dividing cell, and myosin II accumulates near the cleavage furrow in the neighbor cells to aid the process of cytokinesis41. However, our preliminary observations did not show such specific accumulation of myosin II in neighboring Dictyostelium cells, which is consistent with that neighboring cells do not need myosin II for the dividing cell to complete the abscission (Fig. 4D).
We thus propose to redefine and classify multiple modes of cytokinesis for animal-type cytokinesis (Fig. 7). Although there are some common features between animal and plant cytokinesis, such as midbodies and phragmoplasts, which are analogous structures involved in cytokinesis42,43, we want to focus on animal-type cytokinesis. There are two main categories; cell cycle-dependent and cell cycle-independent cytokinesis. The conventional cytokinesis C belongs to the latter. Recent studies have suggested that there are two steps in cytokinesis, specifically furrowing and abscission steps44,45. The furrowing step can be classified into two classes: contractile ring-dependent (furrowing A) and contractile ring-independent (furrowing B). In addition, the abscission step can be classified into three classes: midbody-dependent (abscission A), traction force-dependent (abscission B), and external force-dependent (abscission C). The friction-mediated cytokinesis observed in the present study might be classified as traction force-dependent (abscission B), because the cell divides by traction force in a confined space, although they have no specific anchorage. The cells dividing by conventional cytokinesis D (midwife-dependent cytokinesis) divide by furrowing A (or B) and abscission C (with help from an external force provided by the midwife cell). Based on this classification, most animal cells divide by furrowing A and abscission A. Wild-type Dictyostelium cells divide on the substratum by furrowing A and abscission B but divide in suspension by furrowing A and abscission C (with the shearing force of shaking as the external force). Myosin-null cells divide on the substratum by furrowing B and abscission B.
What is the physiological role of the formation of aggregates of Dictyostelium cells? The plasticity of the division mode might be important for cell survival under various environmental conditions. Dictyostelium cells live in the interface of soil and air and might often lose their substratum; thus, it is plausible that these cells can form multicellular aggregates to divide through the alternative cytokinesis method to survive under such a severe environment.
Methods
Cell culture
Dictyostelium discoideum wild-type (AX2), myosin II-null (HS1), csB-null, and Gß null cells were cultured at 22 °C in plastic dishes containing HL5 medium (1.3% bacteriological peptone, 0.75% yeast extract, 85.5 mM D-glucose, 3.5 mM Na2HPO4 .12 H2O, and 3.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 6.3). An extrachromosomal vector for the expression of EGFP-histone or EGFP-myosin II was introduced into the cells by electroporation, as described previously46. The transformed cells were selected in HL5 medium containing 10 µg/ml blasticidin (Kaken) in plastic dishes. For shaking culture, the cells were cultured in conical flasks (100 ml) containing 20 ml of HL5 medium in a reciprocal shaker (stroke width, 2 cm) at 150 rpm unless otherwise noted.
Non-adhesive coating
Coverslips and plastic dishes were coated with Lipidure, a water-soluble polymer of 2-methacryloyloxy ethyl phosphorylcholine (CM5206, NOF, Japan). Ten microliter of 0.5% (w/v) Lipidure (dissolved in ethanol) was spread on the surface of a coverslip and air-dried at 22 °C. Plastic dishes (5.5 cm in diameter) were coated by pouring 1 ml of Lipidure, removing the excess solution and then air-dried. A solution of 2% (w/v) poly 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (poly-HEMA, P3932, Sigma) dissolved in ethanol was also used for coating using the same procedure.
DAPI staining
Cells were collected by centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 2 min. The cell pellet was mixed with a fixative solution (2.5% formalin and 15 mM Na/K phosphate buffer, pH 6.3) for 10 min. Four microliters of the fixed cell suspension were mixed with 2 µl of 4 µg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma) on glass slides. The cells were covered with a coverslip and then pressed using filter paper and fingers. The cells that contained two or more nuclei were considered multinucleated cells.
Medium containing methyl cellulose
To prevent adherence of the cells to each other to form aggregates, the cells were cultured in HL5 medium containing 1% (w/v) methyl cellulose (M-0512, Sigma). After the methyl cellulose was dissolved in HL5 medium using a stirrer at 80 °C, the solution was autoclaved.
Microscopy
The cells were placed in Lipidure-coated or non-coated glass bottom dishes and observed under an inverted differential interference-contrast microscope (DIC) or a phase-contrast microscope (Olympus, IX71). To visualize the nucleus, DAPI-stained cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, TMD300) by UV illumination47. The cells expressing GFP-histone or GFP-myosin II were observed with a DeltaVision microscope system based on an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Japan) with a 60× objective lens (PLAPON 60× OTIRFM, NA 1.45). Fluorescence images were acquired by z-sectioning at 1-μm intervals. The exposure times for GFP and DIC were set to 0.1 and 0.05 s, respectively.
To observe the cells placed in a confined space, cells and polystyrene beads (3, 4.5, 6, or 10 µm in diameter, PolyScience) were mixed, placed on a Lipidure-coated coverslip (24 × 40 mm), and overlaid with another Lipidure-coated coverslip (18 × 18 mm). Excess medium was removed using a filter paper from the edges of the coverslip. When the Brownian movement of the beads was stopped as the medium was removed, the width was considered to be set to the specified diameter of the beads.
Image processing
Deconvolution of three-dimensional z-stacks was performed with softWoRx (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Japan). The deconvoluted images were further processed using Volocity software (Improvision) and ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Inc, USA).
Data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by one way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Data availability
All relevant data are available from the authors on reasonable request.
References
Fujiwara, T. et al. Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437, 1043–1047 (2005).
Sagona, A. P. & Stenmark, H. Cytokinesis and cancer. FEBS Lett 584, 2652–2661 (2010).
Schwayer, C., Sikora, M., Slovakova, J., Kardos, R. & Heisenberg, C. P. Actin Rings of Power. Dev Cell 37, 493–506 (2016).
Yumura, S. & Uyeda, T. Q. P. Myosins and cell dynamics in cellular slime molds. Int Rev Cytol 224, 173–225 (2003).
Neujahr, R., Heizer, C. & Gerisch, G. Myosin II-independent processes in mitotic cells of Dictyostelium discoideum: redistribution of the nuclei, re-arrangement of the actin system and formation of the cleavage furrow. J Cell Sci 110, 123–137 (1997).
Zang, J. H. et al. On the role of myosin-II in cytokinesis: division of Dictyostelium cells under adhesive and nonadhesive conditions. Mol Biol Cell 8, 2617–2629 (1997).
Spudich, J. A. In pursuit of myosin function. Cell Regul 1, 1–11 (1989).
Uyeda, T. Q. P., Kitayama, C. & Yumura, S. Myosin II-independent cytokinesis in Dictyostelium: its mechanism and implications. Cell Struct Funct 25, 1–10 (2000).
Choudhary, A. et al. Interphase cytofission maintains genomic integrity of human cells after failed cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 13026–13031 (2013).
Kanada, M., Nagasaki, A. & Uyeda, T. Q. P. Adhesion-dependent and contractile ring-independent equatorial furrowing during cytokinesis in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell 16, 3865–3872 (2005).
Biron, D., Libros, P., Sagi, D., Mirelman, D. & Moses, E. Asexual reproduction: ‘midwives’ assist dividing amoebae. Nature 410, 430 (2001).
Nagasaki, A. & Uyeda, T. Q. P. Chemotaxis-mediated scission contributes to efficient cytokinesis in Dictyostelium. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 65, 896–903 (2008).
Thullberg, M., Gad, A., Le Guyader, S. & Stromblad, S. Oncogenic H-Ras V12 promotes anchorage-independent cytokinesis in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 20338–20343 (2007).
Fey, P., Stephens, S., Titus, M. A. & Chisholm, R. L. SadA, a novel adhesion receptor in Dictyostelium. J Cell Biol 159, 1109–1119 (2002).
Nagasaki, A., Kanada, M. & Uyeda, T. Q. P. Cell adhesion molecules regulate contractile ring-independent cytokinesis in Dictyostelium discoideum. Cell Res 19, 236–246 (2009).
Niewöhner, J., Weber, I., Maniak, M., Muller-Taubenberger, A. & Gerisch, G. Talin-null cells of Dictyostelium are strongly defective in adhesion to particle and substrate surfaces and slightly impaired in cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 138, 349–361 (1997).
Tsujioka, M. et al. Talin couples the actomyosin cortex to the plasma membrane during rear retraction and cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 12992–12997 (2012).
Yang, K. C. et al. Investigating the suspension culture on aggregation and function of mouse pancreatic beta-cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 101, 2273–2282 (2013).
Xu, X. S., Kuspa, A., Fuller, D., Loomis, W. F. & Knecht, D. A. Cell-cell adhesion prevents mutant cells lacking myosin II from penetrating aggregation streams of Dictyostelium. Dev Biol 175, 218–226 (1996).
Friedl, P. To adhere or not to adhere? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11, 3 (2010).
Beadle, C. et al. The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. Mol Biol Cell 19, 3357–3368 (2008).
Bergert, M. et al. Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration. Nat Cell Biol 17, 524–529 (2015).
Lammermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–55 (2008).
Agromayor, M. & Martin-Serrano, J. Knowing when to cut and run: mechanisms that control cytokinetic abscission. Trends Cell Biol 23, 433–441 (2013).
Guizetti, J. & Gerlich, D. W. Cytokinetic abscission in animal cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21, 909–916 (2010).
Tang, B. L. Membrane trafficking components in cytokinesis. Cell Physiol Biochem 30, 1097–1108 (2012).
Verbrugghe, K. J. & White, J. G. SPD-1 is required for the formation of the spindle midzone but is not essential for the completion of cytokinesis in C. elegans embryos. Curr Biol 14, 1755–1760 (2004).
Kanada, M., Nagasaki, A. & Uyeda, T. Q. P. Novel functions of Ect2 in polar lamellipodia formation and polarity maintenance during “contractile ring-independent” cytokinesis in adherent cells. Mol Biol Cell 19, 8–16 (2008).
O’Connell, C. B., Warner, A. K. & Wang, Y. Distinct roles of the equatorial and polar cortices in the cleavage of adherent cells. Curr Biol 11, 702–707 (2001).
Urven, L. E., Yabe, T. & Pelegri, F. A role for non-muscle myosin II function in furrow maturation in the early zebrafish embryo. J Cell Sci 119, 4342–4352 (2006).
Owens, N. F., Gingell, D. & Rutter, P. R. Inhibition of cell adhesion by a synthetic polymer adsorbed to glass shown under defined hydrodynamic stress. J Cell Sci 87, 667–675 (1987).
Owens, N. F., Gingell, D. & Trommler, A. Cell adhesion to hydroxyl groups of a monolayer film. J Cell Sci 91, 269–279 (1988).
Gerald, N., Dai, J., Ting-Beall, H. P. & De Lozanne, A. A role for Dictyostelium racE in cortical tension and cleavage furrow progression. J Cell Biol 141, 483–492 (1998).
Barry, N. P. & Bretscher, M. S. Dictyostelium amoebae and neutrophils can swim. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 11376–11380 (2010).
Heid, P. J., Geiger, J., Wessels, D., Voss, E. & Soll, D. R. Computer-assisted analysis of filopod formation and the role of myosin II heavy chain phosphorylation in Dictyostelium. J Cell Sci 118, 2225–2237 (2005).
Itoh, G. & Yumura, S. A novel mitosis-specific dynamic actin structure in Dictyostelium cells. J Cell Sci 120, 4302–4309 (2007).
Tanimoto, H. & Sano, M. Dynamics of traction stress field during cell division. Phys Rev Lett 109, 248110 (2012).
Jahan, M. G. S. & Yumura, S. Traction force and its regulation during cytokinesis in Dictyostelium cells. Eur J Cell Biol 96, 515–528 (2017).
Pramanik, M. K., Iijima, M., Iwadate, Y. & Yumura, S. PTEN is a mechanosensing signal transducer for myosin II localization in Dictyostelium cells. Genes Cells 14, 821–834 (2009).
Neujahr, R. et al. Three-dimensional patterns and redistribution of myosin II and actin in mitotic Dictyostelium cells. J Cell Biol 139, 1793–1804 (1997).
Herszterg, S., Pinheiro, D. & Bellaiche, Y. A multicellular view of cytokinesis in epithelial tissue. Trends Cell Biol 24, 285–293 (2014).
Dhonukshe, P., Samaj, J., Baluska, F. & Friml, J. A unifying new model of cytokinesis for the dividing plant and animal cells. Bioessays 29, 371–381 (2007).
Otegui, M. S., Verbrugghe, K. J. & Skop, A. R. Midbodies and phragmoplasts: analogous structures involved in cytokinesis. Trends Cell Biol 15, 404–413 (2005).
Mierzwa, B. & Gerlich, D. W. Cytokinetic abscission: molecular mechanisms and temporal control. Dev Cell 31, 525–538 (2014).
Schiel, J. A. & Prekeris, R. Membrane dynamics during cytokinesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 25, 92–98 (2013).
Yumura, S., Matsuzaki, R. & Kitanishi-Yumura, T. Introduction of macromolecules into living Dictyostelium cells by electroporation. Cell Struct Funct 20, 185–190 (1995).
Masud Rana, A. Y., Tsujioka, M., Miyagishima, S., Ueda, M. & Yumura, S. Dynamin contributes to cytokinesis by stabilizing actin filaments in the contractile ring. Genes Cells 18, 621–635 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the members of the Dictyostelium research community, the Dicty Stock Center, and the NBRP Nenkin for providing several of the mutants that were used in this study. We also thank Drs. T. Q. P. Uyeda and T. Kitanishi-Yumura for their critical reading of the manuscript and their helpful comments. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.T. was involved in the experimental work and data analysis. S.Y. was involved in the project planning and data analysis. R.T. and S.Y. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Taira, R., Yumura, S. A novel mode of cytokinesis without cell-substratum adhesion. Sci Rep 7, 17694 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17477-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17477-w
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Effects of wounds in the cell membrane on cell division
Scientific Reports (2023)