Abstract
We aim to identify the key protein interaction networks and implicated pathways of BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) via bioinformatic methods. The microarray data GSE75693 of 30 patients with stable kidney transplantation and 15 with BKVN were downloaded and analyzed by using the limma package to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Then the gene ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were done to investigate the molecular function (MF), biological process (BP), cellular components (CC) and pathways of DEGs. Finally, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) were constructed, and the hub proteins were identified. As a result, 249 up-regulated genes and 253 down-regulated genes of BKVN patients were selected based on criteria of P > 0.01 and fold change >2.0. GO and KEGG showed that DEGs were mainly located in nucleus and cytosol, and were implicated in the immune responses. In the PPI analysis, 26 up-regulated and 8 down-regulated proteins composed the pivotal interaction network. CXCL10, EGF and STAT1 were identified as hub proteins in BKVN. In conclusion, CXCL10, EGF and STAT1 may induce kidney injuries by promoting inflammation and prohibiting reparation of tissue damage in BKVN.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The BK virus (BKV) is a double-stranded DNA virus, belonging to the Polyomaviridae family1. Antibodies against BKV were detectable in more than 90% of children by age 10, indicating an asymptomatic infection of BKV during the early childhood2. Once the primary infection occurs, BKV persists latently in the renal epithelium3. BKV can be reactivated after kidney transplantation and leads to BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), which is characterized by interstitial fibrosis and cellular infiltration4,5. BKVN is one of the main causes of graft dysfunction and morbidity in renal-transplant recipients6,7. The cause of increasing incidence of BKVN is still unknown7. At present, excessive immunotherapy, e.g. tacrolimus and mycophenalate mofetil, might be the primary risk factors of BKVN8,9,10.
The common therapy for BKVN is the reduction of immunosuppression, which may result in severe acute graft rejection1. Leflunomide combined with everolimus or intravenous immunoglobulin may be safe rescue therapies of BKVN6,11. However, these therapies have not been proved in preclinical experiments or large randomized controlled studies. Thus, it is important to look into the mechanism of the disease and find out the key point of BKVN for new therapeutic targets.
A few studies have explored the pathogenesis of BKVN, including the innate and the adaptive immune systems. Some researchers showed that the increasing number of dendritic cells could inhibit the immune evasion of BKV, increase magnitude of virus-specific CD8+ T cells and enhance the natural killer cells-mediated cytotoxicity in immune responses to BKV12,13,14. Some immune factors also participate in the pathogenesis of BKVN, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8/CXCL8, RANTES/CCL5, MCP-1/CCL2, and IP-10/CXCL1015. However, previous studies simply demonstrated that expression levels of these cell factors were changed (Supplementary Table S1), but failed to display the detailed mechanisms, e.g. what are the biological functions of these factors, how they interact with each other and which cell factor plays a key role in the interaction network.
Bioinformatics is a kind of tool to collect, classify and analyze biological datasets such as the gene expression microarray dataset16,17. Gene expression analysis by bioinformatic methods has been widely used in genomics and biomedical research, providing insights into the molecular events underlying human biology and disease18. Data mining of the available microarray datasets could help scientists to narrow down the research scope and to carry out targeted experiments.
In this study, we analyzed the public array data by bioinformatics methods to find out the important gene network of BKVN. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were first identified between stable and BKVN renal-transplantation recipients. Then protein-protein interactions (PPIs) were further analyzed. Finally, we attempted to identify the key genes and to obtain better insights into the pathogenesis of BKVN.
Results
Five hundred and twenty-four DEGs were selected
Microarray data of BKVN and stable kidney transplantation patients were compared by the limma package by the linear model, the contrast model and the DEG selection. A total of 502 DEGs were selected according to the criteria of P < 0.01 and fold change >2.0, which include 249 up-regulated genes and 253 down-regulated genes (Supplementary Dataset S1). The hierarchical cluster analysis was done to show the distribution of DEGs (Fig. 1). Above the heatmap, the yellow bar represents samples of stable renal allograft patients, and the blue bar represents samples of BKVN patients. In the heatmap, each column represents a tissue sample, and each row represents a single gene. The gradual color from green to red means the changing degree from down-regulation to up-regulation. Color black means no difference expressed in this gene between patients with BKVN and with stable allografts.
DEGs of BKVN are mainly enriched in the immune response
To investigate biological functions of DEGs, we further analyzed DEGs in DAVID with criteria of P < 0.05 and the count ≥5, including MF, BP, CC and KEGG pathway. In MF ontology, DEGs mainly enriched in 5 categories about protein interactions (Supplementary Dataset S2, Fig. 2a), such as the protein binding (262 genes), the serine-type endopeptidase activity (14 genes) and the signal transducer activity (11 genes). In BP ontology, the majority enriched categories are the negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter (31 genes), the inflammatory response (29 genes), the innate immune response (28 genes) and the immune response (28 genes), which are focused on the immune process. Since a total of 39 categories are involved in the BP analysis, only top 10 categories in the gene count were shown in Supplementary Dataset S3 and Fig. 2b. CC ontology displays the distribution of DEGs in cells. According to results of CC analysis, proteins of DEGs are mostly located in the nucleus (152 genes) and the cytosol (107 genes). Other important CC categories are the extracellular exosome, the nucleoplasm, the membrane and so forth (Supplementary Dataset S4, Fig. 2c). Furthermore, 17 dysfunctional pathways in BKVN are found out by KEGG pathway analysis (Supplementary Dataset S5, Fig. 2d). Important pathways are the chemokine signaling pathway (15 genes) and the phagosome (11 genes).
According to results of the enrichment, DEGs between BKVN and stable renal allograft patients centrally locates in nucleus and cytosol, and probably participate in the protein interactions process in the immune response.
Fourteen significant genes constructed co-citation network in literature mining
At first, 502 DEGs were uploaded onto the STRING website. Then 219 DEGs with score >0.4 (median confidence) were selected to construct the PPIs (Fig. 3). In PPIs, genes closely associated with others were identified with the degree ≥1019, including EGF, TYROBP, PTPRC, STAT1, CXCL10, HCK, CCL5, IRF7, CXCL9, GBP5, PLEK, CD163, SMAD4, CASP1, CDH1, GBP2, GBP1, BIRC5, GZMB, C1QB, CALM1 and C1QA. In the clustering analysis, main biological keywords of hot genes reported in literature were immune responses, tumor necrosis factor and signaling transductions (Fig. 4a). Among 22 significant genes, 16 genes constructed a co-citation network according to previous studies. However, in the network, C1QA and C1QB only interacted with each other, but not with the other 14 genes (Fig. 4b, Table 1).
CXCL10, EGF and STAT1 are significant genes in BKVN
In the CytoNCA analysis, every DEG was scored according to degree centrality, betweenness centrality and subgraph centrality respectively (Table 2). Based on the results of CytoNCA analysis, CXCL10, EGF and STAT1 were chosen as hub proteins. The network of CXCL10, EGF, STAT1 and proteins directly associated with hub proteins are described in Fig. 5, including 17 up-regulated and 5 down-regulated proteins.
Discussion
In this study, we aimed at finding out the key protein interaction networks in BKVN after kidney transplantation. By comparing the array datasets between BKVN and non-rejection transplantation patients, 267 up-regulated and 257 down-regulated DEGs were identified. Then the GO and KEGG analyses show the important role of innate immune system in BKVN. Finally, PPIs were constructed by 219 DEGs and 22 key proteins were selected, including CXCL10, EGF and STAT1.
By the GO annotation in DAVID, we further analyzed biological functions of DEGs, which helped us to infer the pathogenesis of BKVN. First, in the MF ontology, the enriched ontologies focused on the alteration of protein activities, including the protein binding, protein homodimerization activity, serine-type endopeptidase activity and the receptor activity. Both protein homodimerization and serine-type endopeptidase could activate or inhibit signaling pathways by changing structures of important proteins, such as receptors20, and further affect cellular processes, including inflammation, cell death and development21,22. In the BP ontology, the majority of DEGs were enriched in immune process, such as innate immune response, the inflammatory response and the immune response. It has been reported that BKVN is associated with the innate and specific immune system1. BKV may lead to nephropathy via cell lysis, stimulation of the immune system and induction of inflammation23. As one of the DEGs and a ligand of CXCL10, CXCR3 is expressed on T cells, dendritic cells and natural killer cells, and can stimulate the migration and activation of these immune cells in immune responses against BKV24,25,26. In the CC ontology, proteins of DEGs are mostly located in the nucleus and the cytosol. When BKV infects host cells, the virus enters into the host nucleus and lies episomally1. Once reactivated, BKV regulates the transcription of host cells. The other important CC category is the extracellular exosome, which contains all type of biomolecules, including proteins, lipids and so forth27. A number of pathogen-derived components, even RNAs, have been found in exosomes after viral infection28. Exosomes were involved in virus transmission in the infection process. However, little is known about the functions of exosomes in BKVN. Exosomes might offer new insights into the inhibition strategies against BKV reactivation. Taken together, DEGs may affect the structural changes of proteins in nucleus, cytosols and exosomes to participate the immune response in BKVN.
Both the literature mining and the CytoNCA analysis revealed core positions of CXCL10, EGF and STAT1 in the PPI network. CXCL10, a proinflammatory cytokine, has been reported to participate in the pathogenesis of BKVN29. The levels of CXCL10 were found to increase in serum and renal tissue of patients with BKVN as compared with those with non-rejection allografts23,30. We also demonstrated that CXCL10 was more expressed in patients with BKVN. All these findings indicate that CXCL10 plays a pivotal role in the immune response against BKV. According to our results, EGF appears to be another important hub protein. However, few researchers have reported the relationship between EGF and BKVN thus far. Rintala and his colleagues found that EGF played an important role in chronic allograft injury31. EGF interacts with TGF-β, VEGF and some other cytokines to promote tissue repair32,33. As per our analysis, the up-regulated CXCL10 may interact with the down-regulated EGF in the pathogenesis of BKVN. This suggests that BKV may induce tissue repair by promoting the inflammation and inhibiting the tissue repair in renal-transplantation recipients. Thus far, however, STAT1 has not been reported to associate with BKVN. Giacobbi et al. found that STAT1 was necessary in antiviral state and that induction of STAT1 mediated innate immune responses34.
We investigated the crucial proteins in BKVN through various data mining methods including the DEG analysis, GO, KEGG, literature mining, STRING and the PPI analysis. These bioinformatics methods may corroborate each other and make the result reliable. The fundamental aim of our study was to infer the potential mechanism of BKVN via bioinformatic analysis. We did not attempt to find diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for BKVN in this sole study, because renal diseases are frequently associated with immune dysfunction. It appears difficult to identify a single renal disease only by cell factors as biomarkers. Though CXCL10 and EGF have been reported altered in a variety of renal diseases, even in the kidney rejection, the network of CXCL10, EGF and STAT1 in BKVN has not been reported. We believe that this network may provide new ideas for the elucidation of the immunological and biological mechanisms of BKVN.
Our study has some limitations. First, other non-technical site- based microarray data were not integrated in our study. Second, as Sigdel and his colleague reported, the relation between transcriptome to proteome may not be strong enough35. In this regard, making a protein-to-protein network from transcriptomic data might be risky. Due to the bioinformatic nature of our study, the specific mechanism and pathways of CXCL10, EGF, STAT1 and other important proteins in the PPI network were not further investigated. Therefore, animal and laboratory experiments are mandatory to further clarify the pathogenesis of BKVN. Finally, acute T cell-mediated rejection is a well-known confounder of BKVN, and we cannot rule out this confounding factor by this bioinformatic study.
In summary, we investigated the potential crucial protein network of BKVN patients. A protein network was selected by DEG, GO, KEGG and PPI analyses. CXCL10, EGF and STAT1 are hub proteins in the pathogenesis of BKVN. BKV may induce kidney injuries by promoting inflammation and prohibiting tissue reparation.
Materials and Methods
Affymetrix microarray data
To identify DEGs between BKVN patients and stable allograft recipients, the microarray dataset GSE75693 were downloaded from the public Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The dataset GSE75693 was deposited by Sigdel et al.35, containing information of renal bioptic tissues from 30 stable renal allografts, 15 acute rejection patients, 15 BKVN patients and 12 chronic allograft nephropathy patients. Here, we selected the 30 stable renal allografts and the 15 BKVN patients as study subjects. The array data were based on the GPL570 Affymetrix Human Gene U133 Plus 2.0 Array (Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) sourced from renal bioptic tissues of patients. Microarray data were processed by a series of bioinformatic methods to identify the possible protein interaction network and to infer the functional process in the pathogenesis of BKVN (Supplementary Fig. S1). The raw data was preprocessed by Robust Multi-array Average36 algorithmin affy package of Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org/), including background correction, normalization and calculation of gene expressions. For all samples in the dataset, probes for the same gene were reduced to a single value according to the maximum one37.
DEGs analysis
DEGs between BKVN and non-allograft injury patients were analyzed by the limma package of Bioconductor. Linear models were constructed for gene expression data of BKVN and stable renal allograft samples respectively. Then the contrast model was used to compare gene expression differences between the two groups. The Student’s t-test was used to calculate the P values. DEGs were selected based on the threshold P < 0.01 and fold change >2.0. P value here was used to test if the gene was differentially expressed between the BKVN and the stable groups with the fold change >2.0.
Enrichment analysis of DEGs
Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) are two aspects of DEGs enrichment analysis, which helps us to learn the potential mechanism of BKVN. GO annotated genes by a defined, structured and controlled vocabulary38, including molecular function (MF), biological process (BP) and cellular components (CC), while KEGG assigns DEGs to specific pathways39. GO and KEGG can be performed by Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/). We analyzed biological functions behind massive genes with P < 0.05 and the count ≥5.
PPI network construction and literature mining
PPI shows the potential network and connections of DEGs. PPI is usually done by STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins, http://string-db.org/), which is a web source of biological database. List of DEGs was uploaded onto the STRING. According to the official explanation of STRING, the confidence score is the approximate probability that a predicted link exists between two proteins in the same metabolic map in the KEGG database (https://string-db.org/cgi/help.pl?UserId=rtxtBR80pDyg&sessionId=si2cM9wdJB3P). Thus, PPIs of DEGs were selected with the threshold of score (median confidence) >0.436,39. Then the analysis results of PPIs were downloaded from STRING, and modified by Cytoscape (http://www.cytoscape.org/). According to the analysis of STRING, nodes with higher degree in the PPI were put into GenCLiP 2.0 (http://ci.smu.edu.cn/GenCLiP2.0/confirm_keywords.php), which is an online tool for literature mining of genes40. GenCLiP could generate keywords of genes in previous literatures to help us infer the possible gene function40. In GenCLiP, biological keywords of hot genes in previous studies were analyzed by the “Gene Cluster with Literature Profiles” module with P ≤ 1 × 10−4 and hit ≥4. And the co-citation network of hot genes was selected by “Literature Mining Gene Networks” module.
Hub protein selection by CytoNCA
In Cytoscape, scattered proteins were removed from the final PPIs. The hub protein, which interacts most frequently with other proteins and works like a hub in the network, were selected by CytoNCA according to degree centrality, betweenness centrality and subgraph centrality36. Finally, proteins associated with hub proteins at the degree ≥10 were selected and constructed the significant network of BKVN mechanism39.
Data availability statement
The GSE75693 dataset analyzed during the current study is available in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).
References
Ambalathingal, G. R., Francis, R. S., Smyth, M. J., Smith, C. & Khanna, R. BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies. Clin Microbiol Rev 30, 503–528 (2017).
Knowles, W. A. In Human Polyomaviruses: Molecular and Clinical Perspectives. (eds K. Khalili & G. L. Stoner) 527–559 (Wiley-Liss Inc, New York; 2001).
Hirsch, H. H. & Steiger, J. Polyomavirus BK. Lancet Infect Dis 3, 611–623 (2003).
Drachenberg, C. B. et al. Histological patterns of polyomavirus nephropathy: correlation with graft outcome and viral load. Am J Transplant 4, 2082–2092 (2004).
Hirsch, H. H. & Randhawa, P. BK virus in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 9(Suppl 4), S136–146 (2009).
Jaw, J., Hill, P. & Goodman, D. Combination of Leflunomide and Everolimus for treatment of BK virus nephropathy. Nephrology (Carlton) 22, 326–329 (2017).
Alagoz, S. et al. The Frequency and Associated Factors for BK Virus Infection in a Center Performing Mainly Living Kidney Transplantations. Prog Transplant 27, 152–159 (2017).
Brennan, D. C. et al. Incidence of BK with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine and impact of preemptive immunosuppression reduction. Am J Transplant 5, 582–594 (2005).
Hirsch, H. H. et al. Polyomavirus BK replication in de novo kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Transplant 13, 136–145 (2013).
Shen, C. L., Yang, A. H., Lien, T. J., Tarng, D. C. & Yang, C. Y. Tacrolimus Blood Level Fluctuation Predisposes to Coexisting BK Virus Nephropathy and Acute Allograft Rejection. Sci Rep 7, 1986 (2017).
Kable, K., Davies, C. D., O’Connell P, J., Chapman, J. R. & Nankivell, B. J. Clearance of BK Virus Nephropathy by Combination Antiviral Therapy With Intravenous Immunoglobulin. Transplant Direct 3, e142 (2017).
Drake, D. R. 3rd et al. Polyomavirus-infected dendritic cells induce antiviral CD8(+) T lymphocytes. J Virol 74, 4093–4101 (2000).
Drake, D. R. 3rd et al. Induction of polyomavirus-specific CD8(+) T lymphocytes by distinct dendritic cell subpopulations. J Virol 75, 544–547 (2001).
Bauman, Y. et al. An identical miRNA of the human JC and BK polyoma viruses targets the stress-induced ligand ULBP3 to escape immune elimination. Cell Host Microbe 9, 93–102 (2011).
Ribeiro, A. et al. Activation of innate immune defense mechanisms contributes to polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy. Kidney Int 81, 100–111 (2012).
Kimball, A. B., Grant, R. A., Wang, F., Osborne, R. & Tiesman, J. P. Beyond the blot: cutting edge tools for genomics, proteomics and metabolomics analyses and previous successes. Br J Dermatol 166(Suppl 2), 1–8 (2012).
Foulkes, A. C. et al. Research Techniques Made Simple: Bioinformatics for Genome-Scale Biology. J Invest Dermatol 137, e163–e168 (2017).
Mele, M. et al. Human genomics. The human transcriptome across tissues and individuals. Science 348, 660–665 (2015).
Mou, T. et al. Identification and interaction analysis of key genes and microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma by bioinformatics analysis. World J Surg Oncol 15, 63 (2017).
Yoshioka, Y. et al. Protein lysine methyltransferase SMYD3 is involved in tumorigenesis through regulation of HER2 homodimerization. Cancer Med 6, 1665–1672 (2017).
Jung, K. et al. Gene expression profile of necrotizing enterocolitis model in neonatal mice. Int J Surg 23, 28–34 (2015).
Gatto, M. et al. Serpins, immunity and autoimmunity: old molecules, new functions. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 45, 267–280 (2013).
Kariminik, A., Dabiri, S. & Yaghobi, R. Polyomavirus BK Induces Inflammation via Up-regulation of CXCL10 at Translation Levels in Renal Transplant Patients with Nephropathy. Inflammation 39, 1514–1519 (2016).
Hickman, H. D. et al. CXCR3 chemokine receptor enables local CD8(+) T cell migration for the destruction of virus-infected cells. Immunity 42, 524–537 (2015).
Panzer, U. et al. CXCR3 and CCR5 positive T-cell recruitment in acute human renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 78, 1341–1350 (2004).
Hodge, D. L. et al. IL-2 and IL-12 alter NK cell responsiveness to IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 by down-regulating CXCR3 expression. J Immunol 168, 6090–6098 (2002).
Schorey, J. S., Cheng, Y., Singh, P. P. & Smith, V. L. Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles in host-pathogen interactions. EMBO Rep 16, 24–43 (2015).
Dreux, M. et al. Short-range exosomal transfer of viral RNA from infected cells to plasmacytoid dendritic cells triggers innate immunity. Cell Host Microbe 12, 558–570 (2012).
Tatapudi, R. R. et al. Noninvasive detection of renal allograft inflammation by measurements of mRNA for IP-10 and CXCR3 in urine. Kidney Int 65, 2390–2397 (2004).
Hu, H. et al. Elevation of CXCR3-binding chemokines in urine indicates acute renal-allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant 4, 432–437 (2004).
Rintala, J. M. et al. Epidermal growth factor inhibition, a novel pathway to prevent chronic allograft injury. Transplantation 98, 821–827 (2014).
Petit, A. M. et al. Neutralizing antibodies against epidermal growth factor and ErbB-2/neu receptor tyrosine kinases down-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor production by tumor cells in vitro and in vivo: angiogenic implications for signal transduction therapy of solid tumors. Am J Pathol 151, 1523–1530 (1997).
Cappuzzo, F. et al. Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 11, 521–529 (2010).
Giacobbi, N. S., Gupta, T., Coxon, A. T. & Pipas, J. M. Polyomavirus T antigens activate an antiviral state. Virology 476, 377–385 (2015).
Sigdel, T. K. et al. Mining the human urine proteome for monitoring renal transplant injury. Kidney Int 89, 1244–1252 (2016).
Lin, Z. & Lin, Y. Identification of potential crucial genes associated with steroid-induced necrosis of femoral head based on gene expression profile. Gene 627, 322–326 (2017).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25, 25–29 (2000).
Li, L. et al. Identification of key genes and pathways associated with obesity in children. Exp Ther Med 14, 1065–1073 (2017).
Wang, J. H. et al. GenCLiP 2.0: a web server for functional clustering of genes and construction of molecular networks based on free terms. Bioinformatics 30, 2534–2536 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Sidgel and his colleagues for finishing and uploading their dataset. The study was supported by grants from Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Clinical Research Funding (No. 320.6750.16050).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Linpei Jia, Wenjing Fu and Hongliang Zhang finished the statistical analysis. Rufu Jia, Leiyun Wu and Xiaoxia Li prepared figures and tables. Linpei Jia and Qiang Jia wrote the manuscript. Hongliang Zhang revised the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, L., Fu, W., Jia, R. et al. Identification of potential key protein interaction networks of BK virus nephropathy in patients receiving kidney transplantation. Sci Rep 8, 5017 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23492-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23492-2
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Features of repertoire diversity and gene expression in human cytotoxic T cells following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
Communications Biology (2021)
-
Increased CD83 expression of CD34-positive monocytes in donors during peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in humans
Scientific Reports (2019)