Abstract
We have demonstrated metal-on-silicon thermocouples with a noticeably high Seebeck coefficient and an excellent temperature-sensing resolution. Fabrication of the thermocouples involved only simple photolithography and metal-liftoff procedures on a silicon substrate. The experimentally measured Seebeck coefficient of our thermocouple was 9.17 × 10−4 V/°K, which is 30 times larger than those reported for standard metal thin-film thermocouples and comparable to the values of alloy-based thin-film thermocouples that require sophisticated and costly fabrication processes. The temperature-voltage measurements between 20 to 80 °C were highly linear with a linearity coefficient of 1, and the experimentally demonstrated temperature-sensing resolution was 0.01 °K which could be further improved up to a theoretical limit of 0.00055 °K. Finally, we applied this approach to demonstrate a flexible metal-on-silicon thermocouple with enhanced thermal sensitivity. The outstanding performance of our thermocouple combined with an extremely thin profile, bending flexibility, and simple, highly-compatible fabrication will proliferate its use in diverse applications such as micro-/nanoscale biometrics, energy management, and nanoscale thermography.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Accurate thermal measurements serve crucial roles in monitoring industrial processes as well as understanding various natural phenomena1,2. With recent improvements in the fabrication of small-scale devices, there is a renewed interest in technologies for studying thermal phenomena at micro- and nanoscales3,4,5,6. High-resolution detection of temperature changes on small scales could open up new scientific possibilities by providing valuable insight into the thermal energy distribution due to near-field enhancement in nanophotonic structures and mapping subtle temperature differences in biological samples to reveal functional details of cell biology or simply the health of the cells. For example, a locally elevated temperature observed in an atherosclerotic plaque could indicate inflammation that could lead to a potentially fatal rupture7,8,9,10,11. Achieving higher thermal sensing resolution in compact forms can also lead to cost-effective and compact temperature-monitoring modules in mobile applications such as artificial skin, smart bandages, and other wearable sensors12.
For micro- and nanoscale thermal mapping, various measurement techniques such as thermocouples10,13,14, infrared thermography15, optical interferometry1, and fluorescence and luminescence thermography2,3,9,16 have been utilized3,4,9,16. While optical approaches allow remote temperature sensing, their resolutions are fundamentally limited by the diffraction of light, and their use can be challenging in a light-scattering environment such as in biological tissue2,4,17. In addition, properly interpreting the measurement data produced by some optical methods such as infrared tomography or optical interferometry requires sufficient prior knowledge of the optical properties of the complex biomedical environments involved in the measurement4. Furthermore, fluorescence and luminescence thermography require in-situ placement of temperature-sensitive molecules, which can be inconvenient and invasive4,10.
Thermocouples, on the other hand, utilize the Seebeck effect and directly convert a local temperature to an electrical voltage. They have been widely used in diverse systems for more than a century due to their simple fabrication, ease of use, and accuracy10,13,14. A standard thermocouple is made up of two arms, consisting of conductors, semiconductors, or a combination of the two, which intersect at the measurement point. A voltage proportional to the temperature difference between the intersecting measurement point and the open ends is generated across the arms18 and measured from the open ends. The magnitude of this thermoelectric conversion is represented by a proportionality constant called the Seebeck coefficient (S).
Thermocouples can be easily fabricated using standard micro- and nano-fabrication and process-compatible thin metallic films such as Ni, Cr, or Au layers, and they have been demonstrated for various applications5,6,14,19,20. However, these process-compatible metals possess small Seebeck coefficients (Table 1)18, and their poor sensitivity remains a major drawback, yielding temperature-sensing resolutions typically larger than 2 °C (Table 1). Improving their thermal sensitivity requires the use of costly and bulky sophisticated measurement electronics or alloys with high Seebeck coefficients such as bismuth and antimony telluride that are rare, expensive, and challenging to fabricate using standard processes21. Semiconductors such as silicon (Si) are also known to have high Seebeck coefficients19, but previous studies have primarily focused on interaction between metal films and semiconductors with respect to their thermoelectric properties22,23,24. In addition, the inherent high resistance of silicon decreases the final thermal sensitivity and has prevented their utilization in practical thermocouple applications25,26,27. Furthermore, previously demonstrated silicon-based thermocouples involved challenging fabrication processes such as elaborate wafer-etching and bonding to accomplish electrical isolations between the silicon and metal as well as to demonstrate compatibility with bipolar or CMOS processes28.
Using single-crystal-silicon wafers and two straightforward fabrication processes, we have demonstrated microscale metal-on-silicon thermocouples with sensitivities 30 times higher than previously reported metal-film-based thermocouples (Fig. 1(a)). This closely matches the best performance of the alloy-based thermocouples. In order to take full advantage of the high Seebeck coefficient of silicon, we minimized the internal resistive loss in silicon by utilizing the larger current-conducting cross-section of the silicon substrate. In addition, we kept the fabrication process simple by choosing appropriate thermocouple materials and utilizing Schottky barriers and ohmic contacts to create electrical isolation and contacts at appropriate places. This produced metal-on-silicon thermocouples with an experimentally measured sensitivity of 0.01 °K and a theoretical thermal sensitivity down to 5.5×10-4 K on a silicon substrate fabricated in two processing steps.
Development of flexible sensors is another rapidly growing field with relevance in diverse areas including thermography29, photodetection30, and wearable devices12,31,32,33,34 for biomedical applications. Thermal sensitivity is an important attribute for wearable technologies such as electronic artificial skin for monitoring body temperature as well as wound healing12,33,35,36. Wafer-thinning approaches have been applied in the past for fabrication of flexible electronics using silicon wafers37,38. We utilized this wafer-thinning fabrication design and combined it with our sensor design to demonstrate an array of highly flexible thermocouples with excellent temperature-sensing resolution.
Results/Discussion
Design and Modeling of Si-Metal Thermocouples with High Seebeck Coefficient
Our design utilizes a thin metal film as one of the thermocouple arms and a single-crystal silicon substrate as the other arm to take full advantage of the large Seebeck coefficient of silicon. To implement this approach without adding complex fabrication processes, we created an electrically isolated metal arm on a single crystal silicon substrate through the formation of a Schottky barrier. This also minimizes the inherent resistive loss in the silicon by utilizing a large cross-sectional area of the substrate for current conduction, resulting in an undiminished final Seebeck coefficient.
We chose chromium with a work function of 4.5 eV as the material for the metal arm and a properly doped p-type silicon substrate (conductivity: 1–10 Ω cm) with a work function of 5 eV to serve as a silicon arm, so that an electrically isolating Schottky barrier is formed between them. The two arms, chromium and silicon, were joined electrically only at the hot point through a thin-film nickel pad with a work function of 5.15 eV which formed an ohmic contact with both the chromium metal film and the p-type silicon substrate. (See S1 in supplementary information (SI) for more details).
To optimize the design of the proposed chrome-on-silicon thermocouple and maximize the final Seebeck coefficient, we performed circuit analysis as shown in Fig. 1(b,c). We obtained the following equation for the Seebeck coefficient of the thermocouple in terms of the material resistances:
where Seff is the effective Seebeck coefficient of the thermocouple; RCr-Si is the isolation resistance between the Cr and Si arms that form the Schottky barrier; RCr-Ni-Si is the contact resistance between the Cr and Si arms through the Ni ohmic contact; RCr is the resistance of the chromium arm; and RSi is the resistance of the silicon arm. Eq. 1 reveals that the Seebeck coefficient of the thermocouple will reach its maximum and stay very close to the original value of SSi if we (1) maximize the isolation resistance (RCr-Si) of the Schottky barrier; (2) minimize the contact resistance (RCr-Ni-Si) of the nickel ohmic contact at the hot point; and (3) minimize the resistance of the chromium and silicon arms (RCr and RSi) (see Sections 3 and 4 of SI for more details).
For our design purpose, we assumed RCr-Si to be 700 kΩ in our layout based on geometric calculations and the contact resistivity calculated from the experimentally produced Cr-Si IV curve (Supplemental Figure S2). We sized the areas of the nickel pad and the chrome arm so that RCr-Ni-Si and RCr stayed below 10 K Ω. This theoretically predicted that the Seebeck coefficient of the thermocouple would be close to that of silicon (or about 97% of SSi) which would be in the range of 900–1000 µV/K. Further analysis using Eq. 1 also shows that this approach is very lenient on thermocouple miniaturization, and an individual thermocouple can be shrunk down to a few microns in size (Fig. 2(a,b)). Please refer to Section 6 of SI for more details.
A closely packed dense array of the thermocouples can be very useful for high-resolution thermographic imaging but may experience significant inter-device cross-coupling because they share the silicon substrate in common as an electrical-current return path. In order to evaluate the risk of cross-coupling, we expanded the circuit model in Fig. 1(c) to study the interaction between two thermocouples with hot points placed adjacent to each other on a silicon substrate (Fig. 2(c, d)). We varied the spacing between the two devices and performed simulations to find out if a temperature increase at the first hot point would lead to a measured temperature increase due to cross coupling at the second hot point as a function of the distance between the points. The results showed that the cross coupling between the points remains minimal (<1%) down to 1 µm spacing (Fig. 2(e)) as long as we keep the resistance of the Schottky barrier (RCr-Si) much larger than the resistance of the current-return path in the silicon substrate (RSi). The reason is that, for cross coupling to occur, the current must travel through at least one of the high resistance Schottky barriers (RCr-Si). Thus, as long as RCr-Si is large compared to the other resistances in the circuit, almost no current will flow through the cross-coupling path (Please see Section 5 of SI for more details.) Thus, based on our first-order analysis and computer simulations, it is possible to implement a dense array of thermocouple unit cells, each of which measures 5 µm by 5 µm with an inter-spacing gap of 1 µm using the same materials we utilized in this work. Such high spatial density and resolution promise diverse applications of this thermocouple for macro- or nanoscale 2 dimensional thermography.
Fabrication and Testing
The fabrication process for these chrome-on-silicon thermocouples is illustrated in Fig. 3, including a photograph of the fabricated devices. The process is comprised of standard photolithography followed by metal liftoff (Fig. 3(a-c)). Each fabricated chip measured 1.5 × 1.5 squared inch and hosted a 3 × 3 array of chrome-on-silicon thermocouples, with each thermocouple junction having dimensions of 20 µm by 20 µm. As discussed in the previous section, our chrome-on-silicon thermocouples can be potentially further miniaturized down to 5 µm sizes (Section 5 in SI 5).
The performance of the fabricated thermocouples was analyzed over temperatures ranging from 20 °C to 80 °C as shown in Fig. 4(a). The data presented in Fig. 4(a) exhibits an excellent linearity over the tested range of 20 °C to 80 °C with a linearity coefficient of 1.000, ensuring highly accurate and predictable temperature-sensing performance for a wide range of thermal applications. In addition, the Seebeck coefficient of the thermocouples was measured to be 924 µV/K which closely matched values typically observed in lightly p-doped silicon39,40. Our thermocouple provides a Seebeck coefficient 30 times larger than that of common Ni-Cr thin film thermocouples, while still being fabricated using straightforward metal-evaporation and liftoff processes. Further measurements and analysis over a wider temperature range showed that the voltage output of the device exhibits nonlinearities as the temperature exceeds 150 °C due to the increased conduction through the Schottky barrier, limiting the max operating temperature of the device to around 150 °C with maximum sensitivity or to 200 °C if nonlinear one-to-one mapping is used between the temperature and voltage (Supplementary Information 7) (Figure S7). This limitation can be easily overcome if a dielectric layer is used to provide electrical isolation between the chrome layer and the silicon substrate.
To analyze the detection limit of the thermocouple, we first calculated the standard deviation of the voltage noise, which was 0.143 µV as shown in Fig. 4(b). We also set the minimum detectable thermal voltage at 0.5 µV (a signal-to-noise ratio > 3 or approximately three times 0.143 µV). Using this information and the measured Seebeck coefficient, we estimate that the thermocouple can detect a temperature change down to 0.5 µV/924 µV/°K or 0.00055 °K in a standard laboratory setting. This is almost two orders of magnitude higher than the previously reported sensitivities of thin film thermocouples, which are shown in Table 1.
To verify the sensitivity of the thermocouples, a series of temperature measurements were performed by raising the temperature at steps of 0.05, 0.02, or 0.01 °K and measuring the corresponding thermally generated voltage of the device (Fig. 5(a–c)). In all three cases, changes in the measured thermal voltages correspond well with the changes in temperature. We were able to experimentally verify the sensitivity down to 0.01 °K, which was limited by the thermal stability and temperature-sensing resolution of the hotplate setup used in the measurements.
Finally, we fabricated chrome-on-silicon thermocouples on thin flexible silicon wafers to demonstrate the use of the thermocouples in more versatile applications including attachable or wearable thermocouples. To obtain flexible silicon wafers with thicknesses around 10–50 µm, we used a strategy widely utilized for the fabrication of flexible electronics37,38 and etched double-side-polished silicon wafers down to a thickness of about 50 µm. Then we fabricated the chrome-silicon thermocouples on the thinned wafers using the same processes as before. Thermocouples fabricated on the etched wafers were highly flexible (Fig. 6(a)), allowing repeated bending motions with a bending radius of 1.51 cm and a bending angle around 65 degrees. The devices were flexed at the 65° bending angle repeatedly 50 times with no sign of performance degradation. In addition, the device maintained a high Seebeck coefficient of 515 µV/K (Fig. 6(b)), which was much higher than the values of standard thin-film thermocouples but lower than chrome-silicon thermocouples fabricated on wafers with normal thicknesses. The lower Seebeck coefficient of the flexible thermocouples is attributed to the thinner silicon leading to a larger RSi which reduces the final Seebeck coefficient of the thermocouples according to Eq. 1. The increase in RSi that is linearly proportional to the reduction in wafer thickness due to wafer thinning has been plotted in Figure S8.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated high performance chrome-on-silicon thermocouples using established, simple two-step microfabrication. To our knowledge, this is the first thermocouple design to successfully utilize a silicon substrate as one of the thermocouple arms and its high Seebeck coefficient. The design of our chrome-on-silicon thermocouples was optimized through circuit analysis, and the approach achieves Seebeck coefficients of 924 µV/K and 515 µV/K in rigid and highly flexible forms, respectively. These values far exceed any previously reported standard metal-based thermocouples by a factor of 17–30 and closely match exotic thermocouples made of special alloys. The sensitivity was experimentally demonstrated down to 0.01 °K, which can be further improved toward a theoretical limit of 0.00055 °K. The fabrication process was also kept simple and straightforward by choosing appropriate materials to form electrically isolated chrome and silicon thermocouple arms while using a single metal deposition and lift-off patterning without involving additional fabrication steps. In addition to being implementable in flexible forms, our simulations and first-order analysis suggest chrome-silicon unit cells can be scaled down to 5×5 µm2, and adjacent cells can be spaced as close as 1 µm. We expect the design approach and thermocouple platforms demonstrated in this work will be widely utilized in micro-/nanoscale thermometry and thermal mapping specially relevant to plasmonic sensors11,41,42,43,44, optoelectronics thermal studies and characterizations45, and various thermal sensors for biological and physiological analysis7,8,10.
Methods
Fabrication of thin-film metal thermocouples
Single-side-polished (SSP) (100) silicon wafers were purchased from University Wafer (Boston, USA). These included p-type silicon wafers doped with Boron (resistivity: 1–30 Ω cm), n-type wafers doped with Phosphorus (resistivity: 1–10 Ω cm), and undoped wafers (resistivity: >10000 Ω cm). Photolithography and metal-liftoff were used to fabricate the thin-film thermocouples on the wafers (Fig. 3). AZ5214 photoresist was spin-coated onto the wafers and then patterned using a Suss Microtech MA6/BA6 mask aligner. Nickel (Ni, thickness: 100 nm) was then deposited onto the sample using electron-beam (e-beam) evaporation and acetone was used to lift-off the metal. AZ5214 photoresist was spin-coated on the wafers again and patterned using the mask aligner and AZ 400K photoresist developer. Finally, a 100-nm layer of Cr was deposited onto the samples using e-beam evaporation followed by a lift-off process in acetone.
Substrate Tests
To see the difference in the measured Seebeck coefficient of Ni on differently doped substrates (Supplemental Information Section 2), Ni strips with widths of about 500 microns and lengths of about 3 cm were fabricated onto a p-doped (1–30 Ω cm), n-doped (1–10 Ω cm), and undoped wafers using photolithography and metal-liftoff. Electrodes were placed on either end of the strips and their Seebeck coefficient was measured as discussed in the results.
Flexible thermocouples
Double-side-polished (DSP) p-doped silicon wafers were obtained from Ultrasil Corp. (Hayward, CA, USA) doped with Boron (resistivity: 1–30 Ω cm). Ni-Cr thin film thermocouples were fabricated on these wafers as described earlier. The wafers were then thinned down to a thickness of about 50 µm using deep reactive ion etching (DRIE). Santovac-5 high-vacuum fluid (SantoLubes LLC, SC, USA) was gently spread over the device side of the wafers as a protective layer before the etching process. After the etch, the sample was placed in a PG remover to remove the high-vacuum fluid. The thinned 50- µm-thick chips were then cleaned with DI water, dried with N2-gun, and tested.
Current-voltage (IV) measurements
For current-voltage measurements, an ammeter was put in series between the sample and a voltage source. The voltage on the voltage source was initially set at 0 V and then was slowly increased. The voltage on the voltage source and the current from the ammeter were recorded.
Measurement setup
Copper wires were attached onto the metal pads on the wafer using thermal silver epoxy (8331S-15G, MG Chemicals). The hot and cold ends of the thermocouple were attached to two separate hot plates (CP-036HT, TE Technology). Aluminum foil was placed between the sample and the hot plates to protect the measurement from the plate-generated electrical noise. A thermistor was placed on each plate to provide the reference temperature (MP-2444, TE Technology). The thermistor was epoxied into place using an electrically insulating thermal epoxy to ensure good thermal contact (8329TCM-6ML, MG Chemicals). Each plate regulates its temperature within ± 0.01 °C of the target temperature (TC-720, TE Tech). The temperature was varied depending on the measurement being taken (see different measurements below), and the resulting voltage across the device was recorded using a nanovoltmeter (2182 A, Keithley) at a rate of approximately 0.5 s per measurement.
Seebeck coefficient measurement
Initially the temperature plates were both set at 30 °C. Then 1000 successive measurements were taken on the voltmeter and the difference in the temperature of the two plates. The temperature of the cold side was maintained at 30 °C while the temperature of the second temperature plate (hot side) was raised by 1 °C. The measurements were repeated, and the process was continued until temperature of the hot side reached 40 °C.
Working range measurement
In order to test the performance of the thermocouple over a wider range of temperatures, both temperature plates were set to 20 °C initially. Then 1000 successive measurements were taken on the voltmeter. The temperature of the plate on the hot side was then raised by 2 °C, and the measurements were repeated. This process was repeated until temperature of the hot side reached 80 °C.
Sensitivity measurements
The temperature of the plates was initially set to 30 °C and 1000 measurements were taken on the voltmeter. The temperature on the hot side was then raised by 0.05 °C, 0.02 °C, or 0.01 °C. 1000 measurements were then taken again, and the temperature on the hot side was returned to the base value.
Device Noise Measurement
To measure the noise of the device, the voltage of the device was continuously measured by the voltmeter over a 500 s period while keeping the device at room temperature and inside electrical shielding.
Bending Radius Measurement
To calculate the bending radius images of the bent device were taken. The images were analyzed using ImageJ to measure the chord and the rise, and from those the bending radius was calculated.
Data analysis
We used Matlab R2016b (The Mathworks, Inc.) and GraphPad Prism 5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) to analyze the data and create graphs.
Data Availability
The data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are included in this manuscript/supplementary information file and are further available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Asheghi, M. & Yang, Y. Micro-and nano-scale diagnostic techniques for thermometry and thermal imaging of microelectronic and data storage devices, In Microscale Diagnostic Techniques 155–196 (Springer, Berlin, 2005).
Okabe, K. et al. Intracellular temperature mapping with a fluorescent polymeric thermometer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Nat. Commun. 3, 705 (2012).
Brites, C. D. S. et al. A luminescent molecular thermometer for long‐term absolute temperature measurements at the nanoscale. Adv. Mater. 22, 4499–4504 (2010).
Brites, C. D. S. et al. Thermometry at the nanoscale. Nanoscale 4, 4799–4829 (2012).
Kim, K., Jeong, W., Lee, W. & Reddy, P. Ultra-high vacuum scanning thermal microscopy for nanometer resolution quantitative thermometry. ACS Nano 6, 4248–4257 (2012).
Kim, K. et al. Radiative heat transfer in the extreme near field. Nature 528, 387 (2015).
Naghavi, M. et al. Thermography basket catheter: In vivo measurement of the temperature of atherosclerotic plaques for detection of vulnerable plaques. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 59, 52–59 (2003).
Madjid, M., Willerson, J. T. & Casscells, S. W. Intracoronary thermography for detection of high-risk vulnerable plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47, C80–C85 (2006).
Gota, C., Okabe, K., Funatsu, T., Harada, Y. & Uchiyama, S. Hydrophilic fluorescent nanogel thermometer for intracellular thermometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2766–2767 (2009).
Wang, C. et al. Determining intracellular temperature at single-cell level by a novel thermocouple method. Cell Res. 21, 1517 (2011).
Desiatov, B., Goykhman, I. & Levy, U. Direct temperature mapping of nanoscale plasmonic devices. Nano Lett. 14, 648–652 (2014).
Takei, K., Honda, W., Harada, S., Arie, T. & Akita, S. Toward flexible and wearable human-interactive health-monitoring devices. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 4, 487–500 (2015).
Sadat, S., Tan, A., Chua, Y. J. & Reddy, P. Nanoscale thermometry using point contact thermocouples. Nano Lett. 10, 2613–2617 (2010).
Liu, H., Sun, W., Chen, Q. & Xu, S. Thin-film thermocouple array for time-resolved local temperature mapping. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1606–1608 (2011).
Teyssieux, D., Thiery, L. & Cretin, B. Near-infrared thermography using a charge-coupled device camera: application to microsystems. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 034902 (2007).
Jaque, D. & Vetrone, F. Luminescence nanothermometry. Nanoscale 4, 4301–4326 (2012).
Zohar, O. et al. Thermal imaging of receptor-activated heat production in single cells. Biophys. J. 74, 82–89 (1998).
Pollock, D. D. Thermocouples: Theory and Properties. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1991).
Liu, H., Sun, W. & Xu, S. An extremely simple thermocouple made of a single layer of metal. Adv. Mater. 24, 3275–3279 (2012).
Li, G. et al. Real-time two-dimensional mapping of relative local surface temperatures with a thin-film sensor array. Sensors 16, 977 (2016).
Zou, H., Rowe, D. M. & Williams, S. G. K. Peltier effect in a co-evaporated Sb2Te3(P)-Bi2Te3(N) thin film thermocouple. Thin Solid Films 408, 270–274 (2002).
Yamashita, O. Effect of metal electrode on Seebeck coefficient of p-and n-type Si thermoelectrics. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 178–183 (2004).
Yamashita, O., Odahara, H. & Tomiyoshi, S. Effect of metal electrode on thermoelectric power in bismuth telluride compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 5653–5658 (2004).
Wang, P., Bar-Cohen, A., Yang, B., Solbrekken, G. L. & Shakouri, A. Analytical modeling of silicon thermoelectric microcooler. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 014501 (2006).
Van Herwaarden, A. The Seebeck effect in silicon ICs. Sens. Actuators 6, 245–254 (1984).
Van Herwaarden, A. & Sarro, P. Thermal sensors based on the Seebeck effect. Sens. Actuators 10, 321–346 (1986).
Moser, D., Lenggenhager, R. & Baltes, H. Silicon gas flow sensors using industrial CMOS and bipolar IC technology. Sens. Actuators, A 27, 577–581 (1991).
Middelhoek, S. & Audet, S. Silicon sensors: full of promises and pitfalls. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 20, 1080 (1987).
Matsuura, Y. & Naito, K. Flexible hollow optical fiber bundle for infrared thermal imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 2, 65–70 (2011).
Zheng, Z., Yao, J. & Yang, G. Growth of centimeter-scale high-quality In2Se3 films for transparent, flexible and high performance photodetectors. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 8094–8103 (2016).
Kim, D.-H. et al. Epidermal electronics. Science 333, 838–843 (2011).
Zheng, Z. et al. Flexible, transparent and ultra-broadband photodetector based on large-area WSe2 film for wearable devices. Nanotechnology 27, 225501 (2016).
Yeo, J. C. & Lim, C. T. Emerging flexible and wearable physical sensing platforms for healthcare and biomedical applications. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2, 16043 (2016).
Zheng, Z., Yao, J., Wang, B. & Yang, G. A flexible, transparent and high-performance gas sensor based on layer-materials for wearable technology. Nanotechnology 28, 415501 (2017).
Someya, T. et al. Conformable, flexible, large-area networks of pressure and thermal sensors with organic transistor active matrixes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 12321–12325 (2005).
Trung, T. Q. & Lee, N. E. Flexible and stretchable physical sensor integrated platforms for wearable human‐activity monitoring and personal healthcare. Adv. Mater. 28, 4338–4372 (2016).
Sevilla, G. A. T., Inayat, S. B., Rojas, J. P., Hussain, A. M. & Hussain, M. M. Flexible and semi‐transparent thermoelectric energy harvesters from low cost bulk silicon (100). Small 9, 3916–3921 (2013).
Torres Sevilla, G. A. et al. Flexible nanoscale high-performance FinFETs. ACS Nano 8, 9850–9856 (2014).
Fulkerson, W., Moore, J. P., Williams, R. K., Graves, R. S. & McElroy, D. L. Thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, and Seebeck coefficient of silicon from 100 to 1300 K. Phys. Rev. 167, 765–782 (1968).
Faiz, S., Kiyosumi, A., Akihiro, I. & Hiroya, I. Seebeck coefficient of ultrathin silicon-on-insulator layers. Appl. Phys. Express 2, 071203 (2009).
Kumar, S., Wittenberg, N. J. & Oh, S.-H. Nanopore-induced spontaneous concentration for optofluidic sensing and particle assembly. Anal. Chem. 85, 971–977 (2012).
Kumar, S., Cherukulappurath, S., Johnson, T. W. & Oh, S.-H. Millimeter-sized suspended plasmonic nanohole arrays for surface-tension-driven flow-through SERS. Chem. Mater. 26, 6523–6530 (2014).
Kumar, S. et al. Template-stripped multifunctional wedge and pyramid arrays for magnetic nanofocusing and optical sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 9319–9326 (2016).
Cho, H. et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy-based label-free insulin detection at physiological concentrations for analysis of islet performance. ACS Sens. 3, 65–71 (2018).
Mauser, K. W. et al. Resonant thermoelectric nanophotonics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 770–775 (2017).
Liu, H. et al. Towards on-chip time-resolved thermal mapping with micro-/nanosensor arrays. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7, 484–484 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Caltech-Gist collaboration fund and the Heritage Medical Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.A., S.K. and H.C. conceptualized the work and wrote the manuscript. D.A., S.K., and V.N. performed the fabrication. D.A. performed the experimental measurements and did the analytical as well as theoretical analysis. J.L. helped with flexible ideas fabrication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Assumpcao, D., Kumar, S., Narasimhan, V. et al. High-performance flexible metal-on-silicon thermocouple. Sci Rep 8, 13725 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32169-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32169-9
- Springer Nature Limited