Abstract
To guard genome integrity, response mechanisms coordinately execute the G2/M checkpoint in responding to stress. p38 MAPK is activated to prolong the G2 phase for completion of damage repair. Tlk activity is required for DNA repair, chromosome segregation and G2 recovery. However, the involvement of Tlk in G2 recovery differs from previous findings that Tlk overexpression delays the G2/M transition. To clarify this difference, genetic interaction experiments were performed using the second mitotic wave as model system. The results indicate that Tlk overexpression prolongs the G2 phase through p38 MAPK activation, independent of Tlk kinase activity. The results of co-immunoprecipitation, database search and RNAi screening suggest that eEF1α1 and Hsc70-5 links Tlk to Tak1. Reduced gene activities of Tlk, Hsc70-5, eEF1α1 and/or Tak1 couldn’t prolong the G2 phase induced by heat shock, indicating that these proteins work together to elevate p38 MAPK activity. In contrast, a high level of wild type Tlk decreases phosphorylated p38 MAPK levels. Thus, the difference is explained by a dual function of Tlk. When under stress, inactive Tlk increases p38 MAPK activity to prolong the G2 phase, and then activated Tlk modulates activities of p38 MAPK and Asf1 to promote G2 recovery afterwards.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Accumulated information indicates that genome instability is related to age-related diseases, such as neurodegeneration, metabolic disorders and carcinogenesis, etc1. Genome instability can be caused by lesions on chromosomal DNA, called as DNA damage. Exogenous factors to induce the DNA damage are environmental stresses such as heat and genotoxic agents such as ultraviolet light or chemical mutagens. To counteract stress, sensing and response mechanisms in cell cycle checkpoints coordinate their functions to tackle the DNA damage in order to maintain the genome integrity in eukaryotic cells. Among several response mechanisms, p38 MAPK (abbreviated as p38) is activated to inhibit activity of Stg, a Drosophila Cdc25 phosphatase homolog, leading to the G2 arrest2. For promoting the G2 recovery, Tlk is an important regulator that phosphorylates Asf1 and/or Rad9 required for nucleosome assembly and DNA repair, respectively3,4,5.
The cell cycle is divided into G0/G1, S, G2 and M phases, and cytokinesis. Transition from G2 to M phase, known as G2/M transition, begins after the Cdk1/CycB and Cdk1/CycA protein complexes have been accumulated to a threshold level6. In G2 phase, Cdk1 is phosphorylated by Wee1 kinase and kept in the inactive status. Activated Stg removes the inhibitory phosphate groups on Cdk1. The cell then enters M phase7.
The MAPK family contains three major groups: p38, JNK and ERK. p38 preferentially responds to environmental stress, such as heat shock, ionizing radiation and bacterial infection. The activation of p38 is through phosphorylation on Thr and Tyr residues in the activation loop by regulatory kinases. The activated p38 facilitates tolerance of organisms to various stresses to increase survival of organisms8. In mammals, there are four isoforms of p38, α, β, γ and δ. They are differentially expressed and activated in tissues9. Among the isoforms, p38α is well characterized. Mutations in the p38α gene reduce cell survival under stress8. The Drosophila genome encodes three p38 isoforms, p38a, -b and -c. Only p38a and p38b are believed to be bona fide p38 proteins. The function of these two isoforms overlaps because fly homozygous for both mutants is lethal while fly homozygous for either p38a or p38b is viable10. Results from several studies have demonstrated their roles in the stress response10,11.
Tlk is a Ser/Thr protein kinase and is highly conserved among protozoans, plants and animals12,13,14. Mutations in the Arabidopsis tsl gene cause random loss of floral organs, implicating its function in cell division15. Two mammalian tsl homologues, Tlk1 and Tlk2, are identified and their kinase activities are maximally activated by DNA damage during the S phase16,17. These two kinases also participate in chromosomal segregation17. In D. melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, a single gene encodes Tlk homologue. Tlk acts as a cofactor of Aur-B, which is required for spindle formation, chromosomal segregation and cytokinesis13,18,19. Chromosomal missegregation is observed in embryos lacking Tlk activity12,18, indicating that Tlk activity is required for maintaining genome integrity.
As mentioned above, both Tlk1 and Tlk2 activities promote the G2 recovery from the G2 arrest induced by DNA damage3,5. This differs from the findings of ours and others’ that overexpression of Tlk or TLK2 impairs the G2/M transition20,21. To clarify the role of Tlk in the G2/M transition, we mainly performed genetic interaction experiments using the second mitotic wave (SMW) in Drosophila eye disc as a model system22.
Results
Tlk overexpression prolongs the G2 phase
Our previous study shows that overexpression of wild type Tlk in UAS-TlkT2 transgene driven by GMR-GAL4 causes a shift of where most cells complete their cell division from the 4–6 rows of neuronal clusters to the 7–1021. Complete genotypic information is in Supplementary Table S1, including the UAS transgenic flies. This delayed cell division may be a result of prolonged either S phase or/and G2 phase. In eye disc behind the morphogenetic furrow (MF) with Tlk overexpression, the S phase progression was not affected as seen by the bromodeoxyuridine labeling (Supplementary Fig. S1), while the G2 phase was prolonged as evidenced by the significantly widened distribution of CycA by immunostaining (Fig. 1a). Results from the genetic interaction studies further show that the prolonged G2 phase, leading to few M phase cells in the 4–6 rows of neuronal clusters (defined in Methods), was enhanced by reduced either cycA or cycB activity (Fig. 1b). Similarly, the G2 delay was also enhanced by reduced either Cdk1 or stg activity and suppressed by stg overexpression (Fig. 1b). In summary, Tlk overexpression causes the G2 delay.
The overexpressed Tlk acts through p38 to prolong the G2 phase
Besides activated p38, activation of Polo kinase or microtubule catastrophe also induces the G2 arrest. Activated Polo kinase positively and negatively regulates the Wee1 and Stg activities, respectively, to inhibit Cdk1 activity for progression of the G2/M transition23. Microtubule catastrophe activates protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) to inhibit Stg activity, leading to the G2/M arrest23. In our study, the defect on microtubule morphology in eye disc with Tlk overexpression was subtle (Supplementary Fig. S2), indicating that microtubule catastrophe is unlikely. Therefore, the genetic relationship of Tlk with p38a, p38b or polo was investigated. The G2 delay was caused by the overexpressed Tlk, which is one of the gain-of-functions. We performed the epistatic analysis based on an assumption that Tlk acts upstream these genes. Therefore, a reduction of the investigated gene activity was expected to suppress the G2 delay resulted from Tlk overexpression. To reduce gene activity, eye disc heterozygous for one of the corresponding mutants was used. The results of the epistatic analysis indicated that reduction of p38a activity suppressed the G2 delay, while p38a overexpression enhanced the G2 delay (Fig. 2). This is consistent with the finding that activated p38α induces the G2 delay in humans2. The suppression of the G2 delay by overexpression of p38bDN, a dominant negative allele, was not statistically significant. Changes of polo activity did not suppress the G2 delay (Fig. 2). Taken together, these results supported that Tlk is epistatic to p38a.
To further investigate p38a, the dosage dependent genetic interaction experiment was performed. The diagram at the end of Supplementary Table S1 illustrates this genetic concept. TlkΔ14, Tlk27–9, p38a1 and p38a13 are recessive mutants. According to the definition of recessive mutation, no phenotype appears in eye disc heterozygous for one of the Tlk or p38a mutants. This manifests that the elevated p38 activity is sufficient to prolong the G2 phase when under stress, although it is lower. The prolonged G2 phase results in less M phase cells in the 4–6 rows of neuronal clusters, as that in wild type disc. Thus, the numbers of M phase cell from wild type and from eye disc heterozygous for one of either Tlk or p38a mutants serve as controls in this experiment. In eye disc transheterozygous for Tlk and p38a mutants, served as tests (in the legend of Fig. 3b), both gene activities are reduced by ≤50%. If these two gene activities execute in the same pathway as indicated by the epistatic analysis, the remaining activity of the pathway is supposed to be 25%. This reduced activity would result in a lower p38 activity, therefore, the G2 recovery should occur earlier, leading to a significant number of M phase cell.
Activity of p38α is increased to prolong the G2 phase when cells are exposed to environmental stress. Once cellular damage is repaired, the level of activated p38α resumes to normal8. Heat shock was chosen as a stress for the dosage dependent genetic interaction experiment to increase p38 activity in eye disc, based on the facts that heat shock induces double-stranded DNA breaks24 and that kinase activity of Tlk is activated in responding to DNA damage14,16. Incubation at room temperature after heat shock allows the G2 recovery to occur.
Late third instar larvae were heat shocked at 37 °C for 1 hour and then incubated at room temperature for 3 hours. In the 4–6 rows of neuronal clusters, 4.2 ± 1.7 M phase cells were detected in the wild type disc, w1118/+, while 5.9 ± 1.7 to 7.8 ± 2.6 M phase cells were observed in control eye discs, which are heterozygous for either Tlk or p38a mutant (Fig. 3). The difference in the numbers of M phase cells was not significant among these eye discs. However, in eye disc transheterozygous for Tlk and p38a mutants, the number of M phase cell increased significantly, ranging from 12.4 ± 2.9 to 19.9 ± 3.8 (Fig. 3). This increase indicated a lower level of p38 activity in eye disc transheterozygous for Tlk and p38a mutants and confirmed that Tlk is epistatic to p38a.
Different Tlk levels differentially modulate P-p38 levels
Tlk is a Ser/Thr kinase and its kinase activity is activated when DNA damage occurs4. Thus, Tlk may increase p38 activity through protein phosphorylation. To overexpress Tlk ubiquitously, fly carrying a heat shock inducible GAL4 transgene, hs-GAL4, was selected. In hs > Tlk embryos, Tlk levels were 1.3 to1.9 folds higher than that in the hs-GAL4/+ control embryo without stress (25 °C in Supplementary Fig. S3c). This slight increase may resemble the low level of Tlk driven by GMR-GAL4 in MF. Therefore, cold shock was chosen to avoid further increase of Tlk level, based on the report that cold shock does not increase expression of the hsp genes25. The result was as expected that Tlk levels were similar in embryos with four different genotypes (12 °C in Supplementary Fig. S3c).
Phosphorylation on Thr-180 and Ser-182 activates kinase activity of p3826. P-p38 represents the active form of p38. Therefore, the anti-P-p38 antibody was used to determine the P-p38 levels in hs-GAL4/+, hs > TlkT2, and hs > Tlk#0 embryos by western blotting. The results showed that overexpression of wild type Tlk significantly decreased the P-p38 levels by approximately 50% in either hs > TlkT2 or hs > Tlk#0 embryo (0.58 ± 0.16 and 0.48 ± 0.11 folds in Fig. 4). This is inconsistent with the conclusion that Tlk genetically increases the p38a activity. The decreased P-p38 level was also observed in hs > Tlk#0 adult with 15-minute heat shock at 38.5 °C followed by 45-minute incubation at room temperature (Supplementary Fig. S4). Unexpectedly, the P-p38 level was significantly, although marginally, higher in UAS-Tlk#0/+ adults (Supplementary Fig. S4), in which the Tlk level was lower, although insignificantly, than that in hs > Tlk#0 adults (Supplementary Fig. S4). The elevation might be due to more inactive form of Tlk when its level is low. We then tested whether inactive Tlk was able to increase P-p38 level using UAS-TlkKD transgenic fly that encodes an inactive form of Tlk18. After cold shock to hs > TlkKD embryo at 12 °C for 25 min, the P-p38 level was increased by 2.98 ± 0.29 folds, when compared to that in the hs-GAL4/+ embryo (Fig. 4). These results supported that inactive Tlk elevated P-p38 level. Furthermore, this elevation was independent of the levels of total p38. In summary, different Tlk levels differentially modulate P-p38 levels.
Inactive Tlk works with Tak1 to increase p38 activity
To identify TlkKD associated proteins that would increase P-p38 level, a series of three screening experiments was designed. The first screening experiment was to find protein candidates that interact with Tlk from public databases, mainly from BioGRID. The second was to test whether the genes encoding these candidates genetically interact with Tlk, as described in Supplementary Fig. S5. The third was to perform the epistatic analysis to reveal its function in the G2 phase. The dosage dependent genetic interaction experiment was used as the final method to confirm its interaction with Tlk. The UAS-RNAi transgenic flies were used in the third screening experiments. Their off-target problem would be solved in the final experiments.
The first group of candidates was the genes encoding component proteins in the dSTRIPAK complex27 due to the data in BioGRID that shows a direct link of Tlk to dSTRIPAK through the two components, Fgop2 and SLMAP (Supplementary Fig. S5a). However, the results from the second screening experiments did not support that Tlk genetically interacts with mts, encoding the PP2A catalytic subunit of dSTRIPAK (Supplementary Fig. S5b). This is consistent with the elimination of PP2A described earlier regarding microtubule catastrophe (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Since the p38 activity is increased by environmental insults8, it is reasonable to search for proteins that associate with TlkKD when under stress. Proteins were extracted from hs > Tlk RNAi and hs > TlkKD embryos cold shocked at 12 °C for 25 min and co-immunoprecipitated (co-IP) by an anti-Tlk antibody. The co-IPed proteins were identified by mass spectrometry (Fig. 5a). The co-IP experiment was repeated four times. The criteria for candidate selection was that proteins were uniquely associated with TlkKD and were repeatedly identified for at least three times. A total of 71 candidates were obtained (Supplementary Table S2). None of them was a protein kinase or phosphatase. These proteins were then utilised to search for their interaction with kinases ASK1, MKK3/6, MLKs and TAK1 that are known to phosphorylate p3828. From the database search, followed by the second screening experiment mentioned above, six proteins likely linking Tlk to Tak1were found. These proteins were eEF1α1, Hsc70-5, MEP-1, Rm62, Tab2 and Ubqn (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. S5).
We performed three sets of experiment to verify the relationship between Tlk and Tak1. The dosage dependent genetic interaction experiment was first carried out to show whether Tlk genetically interacts with Tak1 to prolong the G2 phase. The results showed that the number of M phase cell in the 4–6 rows of neuronal clusters in eye disc transheterozygous for Tlk and Tak1 mutants ranged from 18.0 ± 3.2 to 20.0 ± 2.2, whereas those in eye disc heterozygous for either Tlk or Tak1 mutant ranged from 6.1 ± 2.1 to 7.8 ± 2.6 (Fig. 5c). The difference was significant, indicating that the genetic interaction between Tlk and Tak1 was required for the G2 delay. The western blotting was then used to show whether this genetic interaction increases P-p38 level. Embryos from Tak12; hs-GAL4 females crossed with Tak1179; UAS-TlkKD males (hs > TlkKD/Tak1−/−) were cold shocked. The results showed a lower P-p38 level in embryos lacking Tak1 activity than that in hs > TlkKD embryos (Fig. 5d), indicating that Tak1 activity was required for elevating P-p38 level. Finally, immunoprecipitation with anti-Tlk antibody was used. The results showed that Tak1 and Tlk were present in the same cross-linked protein complex (Fig. 5e). In conclusion, these results supported that the inactive Tlk associates with Tak1 to elevate P-p38 level when under stress.
Hsc70-5 and eEF1α1 function together with Tlk and Tak1 to delay the G2 phase when under stress
The epistatic experiment was performed to clarify the relationship of eEF1α1, hsc70-5, MEP-1, Rm62, and ubqn with Tlk (Fig. 5b). The results showed that knockdown of eEF1α1 or Hsc70-5 activity suppressed the G2 delay, whereas knockdown of the other gene activities did not (Fig. 6a). Thus, both eEF1α1 and Hsc70-5 mutants were assessed along with Tlk and Tak1 mutants in the dosage dependent genetic interaction experiment. In the 4–6 rows of neuronal clusters, the numbers of M phase cell in eye disc transheterozygous for at least two mutants (from 9.8 ± 2.0 to 23.4 ± 3.1) were significantly greater than those in eye disc heterozygous for only one mutant (from 2.8 ± 1.5 to 9.1 ± 2.3) (Fig. 6b). In conclusion, Tlk, eEF1α1, Hsc70-5 and Tak1 function together, likely in a protein complex, to elevate p38 activity, which in turn prolongs the G2 phase and allows cells to complete damage repairs in eye disc under stress.
Discussion
The goal of this study is to clarify the role of Tlk in the G2/M transition. We showed widened distribution of CycA, indicating that Tlk overexpression prolongs the G2 phase. The results from the genetic interaction studies indicated that Tlk increases the p38 activity, independent of Tlk kinase activity. The inactive Tlk associates with eEF1α1, Hsc70-5 and Tak1 in a protein complex to elevate p38 activity when under stress. Interestingly, our results also showed that a higher level of wild type Tlk reduces P-p38 level, consistent with that Tlk functions in the G2 recovery3,4,5. These results demonstrated that Tlk plays a dual function to prolong the G2 phase and to promote the G2 recovery via modulation of P-p38 levels (Fig. 7). This outcome supports the hypothesis that human TLKs act as a guardian of genome integrity29.
When under cold shock, the level of Tlk was similar in embryo from all four genotypes (12 °C in Supplementary Fig. S3c), consistent with no expression from hsp genes25 since the hsp70 promoter is in hs-GAL4 and UAS-Tlk transgenes. However, the level of P-p38 was significantly increased in hs > TlkKD embryo whereas it was significantly decreased in hs > TlkT2 and hs > Tlk#0 embryo (Fig. 4). Our explanation lies in transcriptional leakage from the hsp70 promoter at 25 °C, resulting in the higher level of Tlk in hs > Tlk embryos when compared to control embryo (25 °C in Supplementary Fig. S3c). The exceeding wild type Tlk or TlkKD is thus expressed from the UAS-Tlk transgenes. When embryo encounters cold shock, the stress likely triggers the formation of TlkKD associated protein complex (Fig. 7) that increases P-p38 level significantly. On the other hand, the same stress likely causes mild Tlk phosphorylation in hs > TlkT2 and hs > Tlk#0 embryos, followed by an autophosphorylation30 due to over-threshold level of Tlk. Thus, Tlk is activated to dephosphorylate P-p38. In control embryo hs-GAL4+, endogenous Tlk may not reach the threshold level for autophosphorylation, thus Tlk remains at a slightly phosphorylated form which has no effect on the level of P-p38. The residual P-p38 is likely from other stress response kinases. In conclusion, Tlk plays a dual function in modulating p38 activity dependent on its level when under stress.
The dual function of wild type Tlk plus the time course of gene expression are used to illustrate the Tlk role in the G2/M transition in eye discs when under stress. Based on the time course, Tlk expression initiates at the middle of MF, therefore, Tlk protein level should be low in this region. It is possible that more inactive form of Tlk exists at the 1–4 rows of neuronal clusters. The inactive Tlk associates with Tak1 to increase p38 activity that prolongs the G2 phase. Tlk protein is slowly and gradually accumulated to a higher level. As described above, the Tlk kinase activity is increased by autophosphorylation when the Tlk level is over the threshold at the 6 row of neuronal clusters. The activated Tlk executes two different functions after it is released from the protein complex. The first is to dephosphorylate P-p38 that reduces p38 activity at the 6 row of neuronal clusters and after. The second is to activate Asf1 that promotes the G2 recovery3,4,5 (Fig. 7). A potential pitfall regarding the Tlk activation is that stress is required according to the very low P-p38 level in hs > Tlk#0 embryo without cold shock (compared 25 °C with 12 °C in Fig. 4). Mechanic stress can be used to solve this pitfall. Mechanic stress in follicle cells is generated when the shape of an egg chamber changes from sphere to ellipsoid at stages 8 and after31. The stress not only increases Tlk level, also induces translocation of Tlk from nucleus to cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. S7). A similar scenario is observed in eye disc. The apical region of a row of epithelial cells inside MF is constricted, which resembles the narrow apical region of follicle cells that lack Tlk activity32. This supports that the overexpressed Tlk is inactive in the 1–4 rows of neuronal clusters. By the 5 row of neuronal clusters, the cell shape changes back to columnar33. Based on the effect of mechanic stress on Tlk (Supplementary Fig. S7) and the requirement of Tlk activity to maintain the columnar shape of follicle cells32, mechanic stress likely activates Tlk activity. The autophosphorylation further increases the Tlk activity when its protein level is high. The activated Tlk decreases the p38 activity and increases Asf1 activity, leading to most cells completing their cell division in the 7–10 rows of neuronal clusters21.
The prolonged G2 phase is important for maintaining genome stability when under stress. As described above, heat shock was applied to prolong the G2 phase based on the fact that heat shock is able to induce double stranded breaks on chromosome DNA24. There might be an alternative mechanism to inactivate Tlk temporally when DNA damage occurs. It is well known that kinase activities of ATM and CHK1 are activated in responding to DNA damage. Then, the activated ATM and CHK1 transiently inactivate TLK1 and TLK216. Therefore, the inactivated Tlks work with Tak1 to increase p38 activity and to prolong the G2 phase transiently in order to provide sufficient time to complete damage repair (Fig. 7). This is similar to the finding that p38 is activated by TAK1 associated with the ATM/NEMO/RIP1 complex when human cell encounters genotoxic stress34. More importantly, the activated p38 phosphorylates p53 protein that maintains genome integrity35.
It is not a unique finding that the inactive Tlk acts as a coactivator. Tlk has been found to serve as a coactivator of Aur-B in either C. elegans or T. brucei, independent of its kinase activity13,36. Moreover, alternative functions have been reported for several other kinases as well, such as RAF, ULK3, KSR1 and EGFR37,38,39,40. For EGFR, activated receptor turns on the RAS/RAF/ERK cascade, whereas inactive receptor involves in the initiation of autophagy through its association with a protein complex containing LAPTM4 and SEC539.
The p38 activity increased by the inactive Tlk/Tak1 complex is able to ensure survival of fly under stress. This differs from the severe rough-eye phenotype caused by Tak1 overexpression alone, in which JNK activity is activated and induces apoptosis41. Although Tlk overexpression induces cell death, the regulatory pathway is not through apoptosis42. Thus, the difference may result from alternative functions of Tak1 when it works with different partners. In human cell, TAK1 is a component in the TGF-β pathway. The TGF-β receptor is activated once it is bound by TGF-β and recruits TAK1 via TRAF6 and MAD7 to activate TAK1, leading to activation of JNK43. On the other hand, when cell is stimulated by cytokine IL-1, TAK1 associates with TRAF6 and TAB2/3 to activate IκB kinase that facilitates the inflammatory response44. These indicate that Tak1 functions in immunity and protection, consistent with the roles of p3810,11,45. In summary, the inactivated Tlk/Tak1 complex is able to increase survivability through activation of p38 when fly confronts to various stresses.
By co-IP and mass spectrometry, seven heat shock proteins (Hsps) were found (Supplementary Table S2). Six of them were ruled out by the results from the second screening experiment, except Hsc70-5. Hsp60, Hsc70-3 and Hsc70-4 were excluded even though their interactions with Tak1 are found in BioGRID. The simplest interpretation is their subcellular localization based on the fact that protein must exist in the nucleus to regulate the Cdk1 activity46. Besides both Hsp60 and Hsc70-5 are dominantly localized in mitochondria, Hsp60 is detected in the cytoplasm47, whereas Hsc70-5 co-localizes with p53 in the nucleus48, indicating that Hsc70-5 is a nuclear protein. However, the nuclear localization cannot be applied to the exclusion of Hsc70-3 and Hsc70-4 because these three proteins are detected in the nucleus in addition to their chaperone functions to restore the structure and function of denatured proteins in cytoplasm49. Alternatively, Hsc70-5 has a non-canonical function, but others have not. Wu and colleagues demonstrate that HSC70-5 inhibits the Raf/MEK/ERK activity and that other members cannot effectively replace HSC70-5 for the inhibition50. In addition, ATM is translocated from nucleus to cytoplasm in responding to genotoxic stress in human cell51. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S7, Tlk is detected in cytoplasm when under stress. Therefore, it is likely that nuclear dATM is transferred to cytoplasm and works with Dchk1 to inactivate the cytoplasmic Tlk. Hsc70-5 not only associates with the inactivated Tlk for maintaining the inactive status of Tlk, also recruits eEF1α1 to reinforce the formation of the Tlk/Tak1 protein complex that increases the P-p38 level. P-p38 enters nucleus to inhibit Cdk1 activity52, leading to the G2 delay. These also explain why Hsc70-5 works with inactive Tlk, but not other members. This hypothesis and the molecular mechanism for activating Tlk activity need further investigation.
Methods
Fly stocks and genetics
Three different UAS-Tlk transgenic lines, T2, #0 and KD (kinase dead), and GMR-GAL4 are described in Supplementary Table S1. Two lines, #0 and KD, were generously provided by Dr. Karch18. A line carrying both GMR-GAL453 and UAS-TlkT2 was generated, GMR > Tlk, in which Tlk overexpression is indirectly driven by Glass activator (Supplementary Table S1). Fly lines cdc2E1-23, cycB2, polo1, UAS-stg, Tak12, Tak1179, Df (2R) ED2247 (a chromosome aberration deletes 37 genes, including eEF1α1) were obtained from Bloomington Stock Center. Fly lines cycA354, stg155, p38a1, p38a1310,11, UAS-p38bDN 56 and TlkΔ14 18 were generously provided by Drs. Vincent, Posakony, Cagan, Han, Matsumoto and Karch. A MEP-1 mutant line, y1 w67c23; P{w+mC = GSV6}GS12243/TM3, Sb1 Ser1, was obtained from the Kyoto Stock Center. Tlk27–9 21, together with TlkΔ14, was used to perform the dosage-dependent genetic interactions with the mutants described above. To knock down gene activities of eEF1α1, Hsc70-5, Rm62 and MEP-1, the UAS-RNAi lines, P{TRiP. HMS00917}attP2, 8542R-1, 10279R-1 and P{TRiP. HMS00540}attP2, were obtained from NIG-FLY and Bloomington Stock Center. The RNAi line to knock down ubqn activity was provided by Dr. T. Chien (Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center #47447).
Alleles of eEF1α1 and Hsc70-5, PBac{SAstopDsRed}LL06026 and PBac{SAstopDsRed}LL00908 abbreviated as eEF1α1LL06026 and Hsc70-5LL00908, were obtained from DGRC, Kyoto Stock Center. Both lines are homozygous lethal. Using meiotic recombination to remove the P{FRT} transgenes, some progenies were homozygous viable. eEF1α1LL06026 failed to complement the Df (2R) ED2247 deletion mutant, indicating that it is a eEF1α1 hypomorph (definition shown at the end of Supplementary Table S1). To Hsc70-5LL00908, two genetic results support that Hsc70-5LL00908 is a hypomorph: there were no eEF1α106026 Hsc70-5LL00908/eEF1α106026 and a few eEF1α106026 Hsc70-5LL00908/Hsc70-5LL00908 progenies; and there were 44.4% viable progenies from Hsc70-5LL00908 females crossed with Hsc70-5k04907/CyO males (Bloomington Stock Center).
All fly crosses and genotypic information are listed in Supplementary Table S1. A conceptual illustration of the dosage dependent genetic interaction experiment is also shown at the end of this table.
My laboratory was approved by Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, to perform fly experiments. The experiments were informed to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in National Yang-Ming University.
Immunostaining
Cell division in the SMW is synchronized. Therefore, it is a nice model system to study function of genes in mitosis. During morphogenesis of Drosophila adult eye, the apical region of a row of epithelial cells synchronously constricts to form MF. The MF sweeps from the posterior to the anterior of the eye disc. In the middle of MF, an array of the R8 photoreceptors is first specified and serves as nuclear centers to instruct neighboring cells to become other photoreceptors that form neuronal clusters. By the 5 row of neuronal clusters, the shape of epithelial cells resumes to columnar33. Non-photoreceptor cells in SMW synchronously divide once. Most cells complete their divisions at the 4–6 rows of neuronal clusters, where we counted the number of M phase cell. A few cells finish their division at the 7–10 rows22.
The late third instar larvae with or without heat shock at 37 °C for 1 hour were harvested for dissecting eye-antennal discs. The immunostaining of eye disc was performed as described by Li et al.21. To reduce stress coming from food competition among larvae, the number of eggs laid on fly food was limited to <100 eggs. Eye discs were dissected from late 3rd instar larvae and put into paraformaldehyde fixative within 10 min. The primary antibodies were anti-phosphohistone H3 (1:200; Upstate Biotechnology #H0412), anti-CycA (1:200; DSHB #A12) or anti-CycB (1:200; DSHB #F2F4). Approximately 25 eye discs were mounted in a mounting medium (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.8, 50% glycerol and 2% n-propyl gallate) and viewed under a confocal microscope (Leica Model TCS-SP2 or Olympus Model FV-10)57. To unmask the epitope recognized by the anti-CycA antibody, the procedure of antigen retrieval was performed as described by Ino58. In brief, eye discs fixed by the paraformaldehyde fixative were incubated in 10 mM sodium citrate and 1 mM EDTA, pH 6.0 overnight prior to heating at 90 °C for 15 minutes for retrieving the epitope.
Collection of data for statistical analysis is described as followings. The pair of eye disc in one larva is considered as two independent tissues. Late 3rd instar larvae from each fly cross (see parents in Supplementary Table S1) were used to perform the immunostaining of eye disc twice approximately 4 days apart with larvae from different vials. If data were insufficient for statistical analysis, the cross and immunostaining was repeated once. Stained eye discs without distortion or disruption on mounting slides were used for counting and measurement of M phase cell and width of protein distribution, respectively. Individual eye disc was counted or measured only once, thus no technical replicate. For example, “p38a1/+, 41” in Fig. 3b means that 41 eye discs accumulated from 3 batches of p38a1/+ larvae were used to count M-phase cell one by one. Each eye disc is one biological replicate, therefore, the biological replicate n is 41 in this case. For statistical analysis, one way ANOVA test was used among 3 different genotypes, whereas two tailed analysis of Student’s t test was used between 2 genotypes.
Western blotting
To determine the level of Tlk and phospho-p38 proteins (P-p38) and p38, approximately 1000 virgin females of w*, UAS-TlkT2, UAS-Tlk#0 and UAS-TlkKD were crossed with hs-GAL4 males for collecting 0–6 hour old embryos. The collected embryos were aged for 12 hours and then incubated at 12 °C for 25 minutes and lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM NaF, 50 mM β-gycerophosphate, 5 mM Na3VO4 and Roche protease inhibitor cocktail). Proteins were separated in 10% SDS polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to PVDF membrane for detecting proteins using anti-p38 (1:1000, Millipore clone 2F11 MABS1754), anti-P-p38 (1:1500, Cell Signaling Technology #9211), anti-Tak1 (1:2000, Novus Biologicals #NBP2-20557), anti-Tlk (1:20,000 produced by my lab or 1:2000 provided by Dr. Karch) or anti-β-Tub (1:5000; DSHB #E7) antibodies. To detect P-p38, embryonic extracts were immediately loaded onto SDS polyacrylamide gels once they are ready and then transferred onto PVDF membranes after electrophoresis. The specificity of anti-Tak1 antibody was enhanced by preabsorption with PVDF membrane that contained 3-4 lanes of proteins extracted from embryos homozygous for Tak12 and then PVDF membranes without proteins around 70 kDa. After incubation with proper secondary antibody, the Chemiluminescent Assay kit (ECLTM Primer Western Detection Reagent, Western LightingTM, Blossom Biotechnologies, Inc, Taiwan) was used to detect the proteins using a Fujifilm LAS4000 Luminescent Imaging System21. Intensity of the bands was measured using Image-J.
Co-immunoprecipitation
Plasmid for expressing GST-Tlk fusion protein was generously provided by Dr. Karch18. Both the production and affinity purification of anti-Tlk antibody were carried out by GeneTex Inc. Its specificity was determined by western blotting (Supplementary Fig. S3a) and immunohistochemistry as described in Yeh et al.32.
The collection and treatment of Drosophila embryos was as described in the western blotting section. Procedure of co-IP described in Thermo Scientific Co was used. The co-IPed proteins were separated in 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel and stained by coomassie blue. To each lane, twelve gel blocks were consecutively taken according to the banding pattern. Proteins in each gel block were identified using mass spectrometry (Proteomics Research Center, National Yang-Ming University).
To determine whether Tlk and Tak1 exist in the same protein complex, proteins in the embryonic extract were cross-linked by 35 μg/ml of bismaleimidohexane (BMH, Thermo Scientific Co.#22330) using the procedure described by Liu et al.59. To reduce protein non-specifically bound by antibody, both pre-immune and anti-Tlk antibody were pre-absorbed by 12–18 hours of wild-type embryos. Protein complex was co-IPed using the pre-absorbed antibodies. The co-IPed protein complex was separated in 0.7% agarose/3.4% SDS polyacrylamide gel with 8% SDS polyacrylamide gel as a cushion60 and detected by western blotting with anti-Tlk and anti-Tak1 antibodies.
References
Vijg, J. & Suh, Y. Genome instability and aging. Annu Rev Physiol. 75, 645–668, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183715 (2013).
Bulavin, D. V. et al. Initiation of a G2/M checkpoint after ultraviolet radiation requires p38 kinase. Nature 411, 102–107, https://doi.org/10.1038/35075107 (2001).
Bruinsma, W., van den Berg, J., Aprelia, M. & Medema, R. H. Tousled-like kinase 2 regulates recovery from a DNA damage-induced G2 arrest. EMBO Rep. 17, 659–670, https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201540767 (2016).
Kelly, R. & Davey, S. K. Tousled-like kinase-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9 plays a role in cell cycle progression and G2/M checkpoint exit. PLoS One 8, e85859, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085859 (2013).
Sunavala-Dossabhoy, G. & De Benedetti, A. Tousled homolog, TLK1, binds and phosphorylates Rad9; TLK1 acts as a molecular chaperone in DNA repair. DNA Repair 8, 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.09.005 (2009).
Lee, K. J. et al. The Catalytic Subunit of DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Coordinates with Polo-Like Kinase 1 to Facilitate Mitotic Entry. Neoplasia 17, 329–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2015.02.004 (2015).
Hwang, A., Maity, A., McKenna, W. G. & Muschel, R. J. Cell cycle-dependent regulation of the cyclin B1 promoter. J Biol Chem. 270, 28419–28424 (1995).
Faust, D. et al. Differential p38-dependent signalling in response to cellular stress and mitogenic stimulation in fibroblasts. Cell Commun Signal. 10, 6, https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-10-6 (2012).
Cuenda, A. & Rousseau, S. p38 MAP-kinases pathway regulation, function and role in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773, 1358–1375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.03.010 (2007).
Chen, J. et al. Participation of the p38 pathway in Drosophila host defense against pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 20774–20779, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009223107 (2010).
Craig, C. R., Fink, J. L., Yagi, Y., Ip, Y. T. & Cagan, R. L. A Drosophila p38 orthologue is required for environmental stress responses. EMBO Rep. 5, 1058–1063, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400282 (2004).
Han, Z., Saam, J. R., Adams, H. P., Mango, S. E. & Schumacher, J. M. The C. elegans Tousled-like kinase (TLK-1) has an essential role in transcription. Curr Biol. 13, 1921–1929 (2003).
Li, Z., Gourguechon, S. & Wang, C. C. Tousled-like kinase in a microbial eukaryote regulates spindle assembly and S-phase progression by interacting with Aurora kinase and chromatin assembly factors. J Cell Sci. 120, 3883–3894, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.007955 (2007).
Sillje, H. H., Takahashi, K., Tanaka, K., Van Houwe, G. & Nigg, E. A. Mammalian homologues of the plant Tousled gene code for cell-cycle-regulated kinases with maximal activities linked to ongoing DNA replication. EMBO J. 18, 5691–5702 (1999).
Roe, J. L., Rivin, C. J., Sessions, R. A., Feldmann, K. A. & Zambryski, P. C. The tousled gene in A. thaliana encodes a protein kinase homolog that is required for leaf and flower development. Cell 75, 939–950 (1993).
Groth, A. et al. Human Tousled like kinases are targeted by an ATM- and Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO J. 22, 1676–1687, https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg151 (2003).
Sen, S. P. & De Benedetti, A. TLK1B promotes repair of UV-damaged DNA through chromatin remodeling by Asf1. BMC Mol Biol. 7, 37, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-37 (2006).
Carrera, P. et al. Tousled-like kinase functions with the chromatin assembly pathway regulating nuclear divisions. Genes Dev. 17, 2578–2590 (2003).
Li, Z., Umeyama, T. & Wang, C. C. The chromosomal passenger complex and a mitotic kinesin interact with the Tousled-like kinase in trypanosomes to regulate mitosis and cytokinesis. PLoS One 3, e3814, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003814 (2008).
Kim, J. A. et al. Amplification of TLK2 Induces Genomic Instability via Impairing the G2-M Checkpoint. Mol Cancer Res. 14, 920–927, https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-16-0161 (2016).
Li, H. H., Chiang, C. S., Huang, H. Y. & Liaw, G. J. mars and tousled-like kinase act in parallel to ensure chromosome fidelity in. Drosophila. J Biomed Sci. 16, 51, https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-16-51 (2009).
Baker, N. E. & Yu, S. Y. The EGF receptor defines domains of cell cycle progression and survival to regulate cell number in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell 104, 699–708 (2001).
Mikhailov, A. & Rieder, C. L. Cell cycle: stressed out of mitosis. Curr Biol. 12, R331–333 (2002).
Velichko, A. K., Petrova, N. V., Kantidze, O. L. & Razin, S. V. Dual effect of heat shock on DNA replication and genome integrity. Mol Biol Cell. 23, 3450–3460, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-12-1009 (2012).
Petersen, N. S., Young, P. & Burton, V. Heat shock mRNA accumulation during recovery from cold shock in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem. 20, 679–684 (1990).
Raingeaud, J. et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and environmental stress cause p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by dual phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine. J Biol Chem. 270, 7420–7426 (1995).
Ribeiro, P. S. et al. Combined functional genomic and proteomic approaches identify a PP2A complex as a negative regulator of Hippo signaling. Mol Cell 39, 521–534, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.002 (2010).
Arthur, J. S. & Ley, S. C. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 13, 679–692, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3495 (2013).
De Benedetti, A. The Tousled-Like Kinases as Guardians of Genome Integrity. ISRN Mol Biol. 2012, 627596, https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/627596 (2012).
Mortuza, G. B. et al. Molecular basis of Tousled-Like Kinase 2 activation. Nat Commun. 9, 2535, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04941-y (2018).
Wozniak, M. A. & Chen, C. S. Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility. Nat Rev. Mol Cell Biol. 10, 34–43, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2592 (2009).
Yeh, T. H., Huang, S. Y., Lan, W. Y., Liaw, G. J. & Yu, J. Y. Modulation of cell morphogenesis by tousled-like kinase in the Drosophila follicle cell. Dev Dyn. 244, 852–865, https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.24292 (2015).
Wolff, T. & Ready, D. F. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster Vol. 2 (eds Bate, M. & Arias, A. M.) Ch. 22, 1277–1326 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993).
Yang, Y. et al. A cytosolic ATM/NEMO/RIP1 complex recruits TAK1 to mediate the NF-kappaB and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/MAPK-activated protein 2 responses to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 31, 2774–2786, https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01139-10 (2011).
She, Q. B., Chen, N. & Dong, Z. ERKs and p38 kinase phosphorylate p53 protein at serine 15 in response to UV radiation. J Biol Chem. 275, 20444–20449, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M001020200 (2000).
Han, Z., Riefler, G. M., Saam, J. R., Mango, S. E. & Schumacher, J. M. The C. elegans Tousled-like kinase contributes to chromosome segregation as a substrate and regulator of the Aurora B kinase. Curr Biol. 15, 894–904, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.019 (2005).
Maloverjan, A. et al. Dual function of UNC-51-like kinase 3 (Ulk3) in the Sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 285, 30079–30090, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.133991 (2010).
Shaw, A. S., Kornev, A. P., Hu, J., Ahuja, L. G. & Taylor, S. S. Kinases and pseudokinases: lessons from RAF. Mol Cell Biol. 34, 1538–1546, https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00057-14 (2014).
Tan, X., Thapa, N., Sun, Y. & Anderson, R. A. A kinase-independent role for EGF receptor in autophagy initiation. Cell 160, 145–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.006 (2015).
Zhang, H., Koo, C. Y., Stebbing, J. & Giamas, G. The dual function of KSR1: a pseudokinase and beyond. Biochem Soc Trans. 41, 1078–1082, https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20130042 (2013).
Mihaly, J. et al. The role of the Drosophila TAK homologue dTAK during development. Mech Dev. 102, 67–79 (2001).
Zhang, Y., Cai, R., Zhou, R., Li, Y. & Liu, L. Tousled-like kinase mediated a new type of cell death pathway in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 23, 146–157, https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.77 (2016).
Massague, J. TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 13, 616–630, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3434 (2012).
Ishitani, T. et al. Role of the TAB2-related protein TAB3 in IL-1 and TNF signaling. EMBO J. 22, 6277–6288, https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg605 (2003).
He, Y. et al. p38 MAPK inhibits autophagy and promotes microglial inflammatory responses by phosphorylating ULK1. J Cell Biol, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201701049 (2017).
Vergés, E., Colomina, N., Garí, E., Gallego, C. & Aldea, M. Cyclin Cln3 Is Retained at the ER and Released by the J Chaperone Ydj1 in Late G1 to Trigger Cell Cycle Entry. Mol Cell. 26, 649–662, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.023 (2007).
Kohrt, D., Crary, J., Gocheva, V., Hinds, P. W. & Grossel, M. J. Distinct subcellular distribution of cyclin dependent kinase 6. Cell Cycle 8, 2837–2843, https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.17.9521 (2014).
Ryu, J. et al. Identification and Functional Characterization of Nuclear Mortalin in Human Carcinogenesis. J Biol Chem. 289, 24832–24844, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.565929 (2014).
Casas, C. GRP78 at the Centre of the Stage in Cancer and Neuroprotection. Front Neurosci. 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00177 (2017).
Wu, P. K. et al. A mortalin/HSPA9-mediated switch in tumor-suppressive signaling of Raf/MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 33, 4051–4067, https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00021-13 (2013).
Hadian, K. & Krappmann, D. Signals from the nucleus: activation of NF-kappaB by cytosolic ATM in the DNA damage response. Sci Signal. 4, pe2, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001712 (2011).
George, V. T., Brooks, G. & Humphrey, T. C. Regulation of cell cycle and stress responses to hydrostatic pressure in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 18, 4168–4179, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-12-1141 (2007).
Freeman, M. Reiterative use of the EGF receptor triggers differentiation of all cell types in the Drosophila eye. Cell 87, 651–660 (1996).
Greaves, S., Sanson, B., White, P. & Vincent, J. P. A screen for identifying genes interacting with armadillo, the Drosophila homolog of beta-catenin. Genetics 153, 1753–1766 (1999).
Hartenstein, V. & Posakony, J. W. Sensillum development in the absence of cell division: the sensillum phenotype of the Drosophila mutant string. Dev Biol. 138, 147–158 (1990).
Adachi-Yamada, T. et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase can be involved in transforming growth factor beta superfamily signal transduction in Drosophila wing morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 19, 2322–2329 (1999).
Blair, S. S. In Drosophila protocols (eds Sullivan, W., Ashbourner, M. & Hawley, R. S.) Ch. 10, PP. 159–173 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2000).
Ino, H. Antigen retrieval by heating en bloc for pre-fixed frozen material. J Histochem Cytochem. 51, 995–1003 (2003).
Liu, N., Dansereau, D. A. & Lasko, P. Fat facets interacts with vasa in the Drosophila pole plasm and protects it from degradation. Curr Biol. 13, 1905–1909 (2003).
Liaw, G. J. Pits, a protein interacting with Ttk69 and Sin3A, has links to histone deacetylation. Sci Rept. 6, 33388, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33388 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully thank the Fly Core in Taiwan for preparing fly food and ordering stocks, and the Instrument Center and the Proteomics Research Center, National Yang-Ming University for providing equipment and service. This work was supported by MOST grants [98-2311-B-010-005-MY3 and 102-2311-B-010-005-MY3] and a grant from Ministry of Education, Aim for the Top University Plan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.-J.L. designed the experimental approaches, executed the experiments and wrote this manuscript. C.-S.C. revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liaw, GJ., Chiang, CS. Inactive Tlk associating with Tak1 increases p38 MAPK activity to prolong the G2 phase. Sci Rep 9, 1885 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36137-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36137-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The Tousled-like kinases regulate genome and epigenome stability: implications in development and disease
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019)