Abstract
Bone marrow stromal (Mesenchymal) stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent bone cells capable of differentiating into mesoderm-type cells, such as osteoblasts and adipocytes. Existing evidence suggests that transformation of MSCs gives rise to sarcoma. In order to identify the molecular mechanism leading to spontaneous transformation of human bone marrow MSCs (hBMSCs), we performed comprehensive microRNA (miRNA) and mRNA profiling in the transformed hBMSC-Tum line compared to the parental clone. As a result, we identified multiple dysregulated molecular networks associated with the hBMSC transformed phenotype. LIN28B was upregulated 177.0-fold in hBMSC-Tum, which was associated with marked reduction in LET-7 expression and upregulated expression of its target HMGA2. Targeted depletion of LIN28B or exogenous expression of LET-7b suppressed hBMSC-Tum proliferation, colony formation, and migration. On the other hand, forced expression of LIN28B promoted malignant transformation of parental hBMSC cells as shown by enhanced in vitro colony formation, doxorubicin resistance, and in vivo tumor formation in immunocompromised mice. Analysis of LIN28B and HMGA2 expression levels in cohorts from The Cancer Genome Atlas sarcoma dataset revealed a strong inverse-relationship between elevated expression and overall survival (OS) in 260 patients (p = 0.005) and disease-free survival (DFS) in 231 patients (p = 0.02), suggesting LIN28B and HMGA2 are important regulators of sarcoma biology. Our results highlight an important role for the LIN28B/LET-7 axis in human sarcoma pathogenesis and suggest that the therapeutic targeting of LIN28B may be relevant for patients with sarcoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sarcomas are malignant tumors that arise from transformed cells of stromal or mesenchymal origin. Despite their rarity, sarcomas represent a clinical challenge requiring a better understanding of their pathogenesis, as well as a need for the identification of novel markers to be employed in targeted therapy1.
A number of recent studies have demonstrated that stromal human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) represent the cells-of-origin of sarcomas. We have previously reported transformed phenotype of immortalized primary bone marrow-derived human stromal (mesenchymal) cells upon continuous passaging in culture2. Results from other studies are consistent with these initial findings that hMSCs were serially transformed by a retrovirus containing human telomerase reverse transcriptase, simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40 TAg), and lentivirus containing oncogenic H-Ras, leading to the formation of sarcoma-like tumors in vivo3.
The transforming property of MSCs and their role as sarcoma-initiating cells suggest their use as a suitable model to investigate sarcoma pathogenesis4, and to identify mechanism(s) underlying malignant transformation. Herein, we performed global mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) expression profiling in non-transformed parental hBMSC and transformed hBMSC-Tum cells. Our data revealed distinct miRNA and mRNA expression profiles associated with malignant transformation, highlighted a pivotal role for the LIN28B/LET-7 axis in the transformation process of hBMSC, and indicated that elevated expression of LIN28B and HMGA2 may be predictive of poor clinical outcome in sarcoma patients.
Results
Multiple altered genetic pathways were associated with the transformed phenotype of hBMSC-Tum cells
Few studies have investigated the epigenetic mechanisms associated with human sarcoma pathogenesis5,6,7,8. In the current study, we employed a model of human sarcoma generated via the spontaneous transformation of immortalized human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) upon continuous passaging in culture. The hBMSC-Tum cells exhibited higher proliferation rates in vitro compared to parental control cells (Fig. 1a, upper left panel) and formed sarcoma-like tumors in vivo that were associated with high mitotic activity and increased angiogenesis (Fig. 1a, upper right panel). These tumors were positive for vimentin and negative for cytokeratin, confirming a mesenchymal origin (Fig. 1a, lower panels). Global gene expression profiling of the hBMSC-Tum cells revealed substantial changes in their transcriptome compared to the parental non-transformed hBMSC line (Fig. 1b). We identified 3269 genes that were differentially expressed (fold change ≥ 2.0; P (Corr), 0.05), which are shown in Supplementary Table 1. We found several of the upregulated genes in our study to be associated with different types of human sarcomas, including GPR65, ARHGDIB, PPARG, HSD11B1, KYNU, SPRR2A, CCR1, PEG10, CLDN14, TFPI2, CYP2J2, PTPRN2, HLA-DQB1, CCL3, MAGEA8, COL5A3, HLA-DPA1, GFPT2, AIM2, HLA-DPB1, and TNNT19,10. Based on gene expression, the highest resemblance of hBMSC-Tum was with liposarcoma (7.5%), rhabdomyosarcoma (7.0%), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (6.3%), and fibrosarcoma (5.2%) (Supplementary Fig. 1). The distribution of the top-15 enriched pathways for the differentially-expressed genes in the hBMSC-Tum cells is shown in Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 2. Several of the identified genetic pathways play important roles in stromal (mesenchymal) stem cell differentiation, such as ossification and adipogenesis, highlighting the maintenance of the stromal phenotype during transformation. We also observed the presence of an inflammatory signature in the hBMSC-Tum cells. The expression of a selected number of genes (ACTB, LIN28B, HMGA2, IGF2BP2, and SLIT3) was validated using qRT-PCR, demonstrating good concordance with the microarray data (Fig. 1d, upper panel). LIN28B was among the highly expressed genes based on the microarray data (approximately a 177.0 fold-change) and western blot analysis corroborated its upregulation in the hBMSCs-Tum cells (Fig. 1d, lower panel). We also noted the downregulation of CD24 and the upregulation of HLA-DR in the hBMSC-Tum cells, which was further validated by results from flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 1e). The expression of other hBMSC surface markers did not change significantly during transformation (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Expression profiling of miRNA in hBMSC-Tum cells
To gain more insight into the epigenetic mechanisms leading to transformation of hBMSC-Tum cells, we performed global miRNA expression profiling of the hBMSC-Tum cells compared to non-transformed hBMSC cells. Cluster analysis revealed a distinct separation of the two cell lines based on their miRNA expression signatures (Fig. 2a). The list of differentially expressed miRNAs in the hBMSC-Tum cells compared to parental hBMSC cells is shown in Supplementary Table 3. The expression of a selected panel of miRNAs (Let-7b, Let-7g, Let-7i, miR-98, and miR-218) was subsequently validated using a Taqman microRNA assay and demonstrated good concordance with the microarray data (Fig. 2b). In silico prediction revealed approximately 22% of the upregulated genes to be potential targets of the downregulated miRNAs in the hBMSC-Tum cells (Fig. 2c). Similarly, approximately 10% of the downregulated genes were found to be potential targets of the upregulated miRNAs in the hBMSC-Tum cells (Fig. 2d). Common upregulated and downregulated genes from Fig. 2c,d were subsequently subjected to ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), which provides a powerful tool to predict the increase or decrease in downstream biological activities and functions, which hare are likely to be casually affected by the transcriptome data. Figure 2e presents a high-level tree map of affected downstream functional categories based on common up and downregulated genes in hBMSC-Tum and predicted targets of differentially expressed miRNAs. This analysis revealed remarkable enrichment in several functional categories, mainly those involved in cancer cell growth, and proliferation and invasion (Fig. 2F,g). Additionally, genes associated with increased cell viability and survival were enriched, while genes associated with cell death were diminished (Fig. 2h). Top 5 enriched and top 5 diminished functional categories are shown in Fig. 2i. Growth and proliferation of cancer cells network is depicted in Fig. 2j, which highlighted a role for Lin28B and HMGA2 in this network. Upstream regulator analysis revealed significant enrichment in several mechanistic networks including SMARCA4, TNF, FOXO1, NFkB (complex), CAMP, Mek, CG, PPRC1, TGFB1, ERK, IL1B, PGR, and P38 MAPK (Supplementary Table 4).Taken together, our data revealed a significant increase in tumour growth, proliferation, and invasion, while functional categories associated with cell death were suppressed.
LIN28B/LET-7 axis is associated with the transformed phenotype of hBMSC-Tum cells
Global mRNA and miRNA expression data revealed the upregulation of LIN28B and the downregulation of several members of the LET-7 family in the hBMSC-Tum cells. LIN28B is known to inhibit processing and maturation of the LET-7 family miRNAs, while mature LET-7 is also known to target LIN28B11. To investigate this plausible molecular mechanisms, we overexpressed LET-7b in hBMSC-Tum cells, which led to significant changes in their global gene-expression profile (Fig. 3a,b). Among the highly downregulated genes, HMGA2, LIN28B, CCL3, and DICER1 were selected and validated using qRT-PCR (Fig. 3c). Downregulation of LIN28B in the hBMSC-Tum cells in response to LET-7b overexpression was also validated using western blot analysis (Fig. 3d). In order to identify the set of genes regulated by the LIN28B/LET-7 axis in in this system, we assessed the intersection between genes that were upregulated in the hBMSC-Tum cells and the genes downregulated in hBMSC-Tum cells transfected with LET-7b, and compared the results with the list of in silico-predicted LET-7b-target genes (Fig. 3e). This analysis revealed 34 genes that were common to all three conditions (Fig. 3e). HMGA2, LIN28B, and several members of the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein family were among the genes identified (Fig. 3f).
The LET-7 family directly targeted LIN28B and HMGA2 in hBMSC-Tum cells
We subsequently focused on LIN28B and HMGA2 for further investigation given their documented roles in several human cancers12. Forty-six miRNAs downregulated in the hBMSC-Tum cells were also predicted by the in silico analysis to target LIN28B and HMGA2 (Fig. 4a). Five of those miRNAs belonged to the LET-7 family (Fig. 4b). Over expression of LET-7b (as a representative of the LET-7 family), as well as siRNA-mediated knockdown of LIN28B, reduced colony formation (Fig. 4c) and proliferation (Fig. 4d) of the hBMSC-Tum cells. In addition, over-expression of LET-7b or siRNA-mediated knockdown of LIN28B expression led to significant inhibition of real-time migration of the hBMSC-Tum cells (Fig. 4e).
Forced expression of LIN28B led to transformation of the parental hBMSC cells
Our data highlighted a role for the LIN28B/LET-7 circuit in hBMSC-Tum cells. Therefore, we sought to determine if LIN28B could transform the parental hBMSC cells. Parental non-tumorigenic hBMSC line were transduced using lentiviral vector carrying human LIN28B and the global mRNA gene expression in the transduced cells was determined using microarray analysis. Hierarchical clustering comparing the hBMSC-LIN28B cells to the hBMSC-mCherry-control cells revealed a clear separation of the two cell lines (Fig. 5a). The top-15 enriched genetic pathways, based on the upregulated genes in the hBMSC-LIN28B cells, is shown in Fig. 5b and included those involved in focal adhesion, integrin cell surface interaction, G protein coupled receptors, and others. The expression levels of a number of these genes related to the LIN28B/LET-7 axis (LIN28B, HMGA2 and DICER1) were subsequently selected and validated using qRT-PCR (Fig. 5c). Expression of the LIN28B protein in the hBMSC-LIN28B cells was validated by western blot analysis, as shown in Fig. 5c. Forced expression of LIN28B enhanced the clonogenic potential of hBMSC cells (Fig. 5d). Furthermore, for in vivo assessment of tumorigenic potential, hBMSC-LIN28B cells were subcutaneously implanted into immune deficient SCID mice and tumor formation was monitored. Data presented in Fig. 5e demonstrates the progressive tumor growth of the implanted hBMSC-LIN28B cells, whereas the control cells did not form tumors. Histological examination of the tumors revealed proliferating fibromyxoid sarcoma with increased mitotic figures and angiogenesis (Fig. 5f).
Differential sensitivity of hBMSC-Tum, hBMSC-LIN28B, and parental hBMSC cell lines to doxorubicin treatment
Doxorubicin is an important chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of sarcoma but a significant number of aggressive sarcomas exhibit doxorubicin resistance13. A number of studies has implicated the let-7 family in mediating chemotherapy resistance in other cancer types14,15. Therefore, we tested a possible role for LIN28B in doxorubicin resistance in sarcoma. We compared the chemo-sensitivity of hBMSC-LIN28B cells to doxorubicin to the sensitivity of hBMSC-Tum cells. Both types of cells were incubated in the presence of doxorubicin (7.8 nM to 125 nM) for 5 days and the apoptotic/necrotic responses were assessed. Doxorubicin concentrations >31.2 nM were toxic to all cells (Fig. 6). At 15.6 nM, hBMSC control cells exhibited formation of perinuclear cytoplasmic vacuoles. Compared to doxorubicin treatment at 31.2 nM, the number of cells containing apoptotic bodies (condensed chromatin and nuclear fragmentations) and dead cells was increased by treatment of the cells with 62.5 nM and 125 nM doxorubicin. However, these morphological changes were only observed in the hBMSC-Tum cells at the higher concentrations (Fig. 6, second panel). The hBMSC-LIN28B cells exhibited greater doxorubicin resistance compared to all the other cells types (Fig. 6, fourth panel). Similar differential sensitivity was also observed using flow cytometry cell cycle analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3).
LIN28B expression was a possible prognostic marker for sarcoma
To corroborate the clinical relevance of our findings, we examined the expression of LIN28B and HMGA2 in sarcoma cohort using the StarBase database. Data presented in Fig. 7a revealed strong correlation between Lin28B and HMGA2 expression in 263 sarcoma patients (r = 0.36, p = 1.1 × 10−9). Additionally, inverse correlation between lET-7b and LIN28B was observed in the same cohort (r = −0.3, p = 4.1 × 10−7, Fig. 7b). Overall survival (OS, n = 260) and disease free survive l (DFS, n = 231) analysis on the TCGA sarcoma dataset revealed strong associations between the elevated expression levels of these proteins and poor OS (p = 0.005, Fig. 7c) and poor DFS (p = 0.02, Fig. 7d), thus implicating LIN28B and HMGA2 as clinically relevant biomarkers for sarcoma.
Discussion
The notion that hMSCs being representative of the cell-of-origin of sarcomas has been considered in a number of recent studies; however, the molecular mechanisms leading to malignant transformation are still unknown. In the current study, we identified miRNA and mRNA expression signatures that were associated with the hBMSC transformed phenotype. In addition, we identified LIN28B/LET-7 as a possible molecular circuit underlying the transformed phenotype of hBMSC in vitro and associated it with the poor clinical prognosis for patients with sarcoma.
A number of previous models have been employed in vitro to study sarcoma biology, including transformed hMSCs using specific genetic elements4. In contrast to these studies, our study employed a biologically relevant model of spontaneously transformed hBMSCs and were able to compare non-transformed and transformed cells with the same genetic background. In addition, in contrast to the other models, the hBMSC-Tum model employed in current study maintained a normal karyotype16, helping to increase the sensitivity in identifying relevant molecular pathways associated with transformation. Finally, the relevance of this model was demonstrated by it exhibiting a similar molecular signature to those reported for clinically retrieved sarcomas9. Furthermore, our data revealed substantial similarities between the miRNA expression profile of transformed hBMSCs and those reported for human sarcomas. Approximately 30% of the altered miRNAs in human sarcomas reported by Subramanian et al.8 were also altered in transformed hBMSC-Tum cells identified in our current study and included hsa-miR-214, hsa-miR-379, hsa-miR-376a, hsa-miR-335, hsa-miR-10a, hsa-miR-29b, hsa-miR-29c, hsa-miR-30d, hsa-miR-143, hsa-miR-145, hsa-miR-195, hsa-miR-10b, hsa-let-7b, hsa-let-7d, hsa-miR-26a, hsa-miR-26b, hsa-miR-16, hsa-miR-15a, hsa-miR-497, hsa-miR-222, hsa-miR-424, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-218, and hsa-miR-30c.
Cumulative evidence implicates miRNAs and their regulatory networks in arbitrating tumor progression, mainly through the regulation of their relevant mRNA targets17. LIN28A and LIN28B selectively inhibit LET-7 miRNA expression and biogenesis in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and block the expression of LET-7 through TUTase-dependent and independent mechanisms18,19. In addition, compelling evidence supports the role for LIN28 as an oncogene, including its direct targeting by the LET-7 family and its effect in combination with several known oncogenes on cell reprogramming11,20,21. In addition, LIN28A and LIN28B are upregulated in several advanced human cancers and are reliable predictors of a poor prognosis12,21. However, the role of the LIN28/LET-7 axis in hBMSC transformation and sarcoma pathogenesis remains unknown.
We observed the upregulation of LIN28B and downregulation of the LET-7 family in the tumorigenic transformation of hBMSCs. The tumor-suppressive LET-7 miRNA family targets oncogenes such as HMGA2, LIN28B, and IGF2BP1 to form a LET-7 antagonizing, self-promoting, oncogenic triangle22. Concordantly, our data demonstrated that HMGA2 and LIN28B were upregulated in hBMSC-Tum cells and were suppressed upon the re-expression of LET-7. Iliopoulos et al. reported that the activation of NFKB by Src induces cellular transformation via the LIN28B, LET-7, and IL-6 circuit23. The hBMSC-Tum model exhibited high levels of pro-inflammatory markers such as IL1β and IL6. Therefore, it is plausible that high levels of inflammation during the transformation of parental hBMSC cells induces the expression of LIN28B, followed by the downregulation of LET-7 and increased expression levels of IL6, which ultimately results in a transformed phenotype. Thus, we propose a model for the role for the LIN28B/LET-7 axis in the underlying mechanism of hBMSC transformation (Fig. 7e). Concordant with our findings, interrogation of LIN28B expression in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) database revealed upregulated expression of LIN28B in a number of Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines (Supplementary Figure 4). While our proposed model highlights a role for LIN28B in cellular transformation via LET-7, it is plausible that LIN28B may also promote cellular transformation through a LET-7 independent mechanism24.
Our data highlighted a role for LIN28B in conferring doxorubicin resistance in vitro. Edmonson et al. reported a lower efficacy of doxorubicin when it is administered alone compared to when it is combined with ifosfamide or with mitomycin and cisplatin, suggesting the presence of a resistance mechanism in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas13. Therefore, it is possible that elevated levels of LIN28B indeed mediate doxorubicin resistance in those patients. In agreement with those findings, patient survival data positively correlated elevated levels of LIN28B and HMGA2 with poor clinical outcome in sarcoma patients. Our data support the clinical relevance of LIN28B and HMGA2 as possible prognostic markers and as molecular targets for novel therapeutic approaches in sarcoma.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
All animal procedures were approved by the local ethical committees on animal experiments at the University of Southern Denmark. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of the animal care committee at the University of Southern Denmark.
Cell lines and culture
We used a well-characterized hTERT-immortalized adult hBMSC cell line that expressed all the known markers of primary hBMSCs and is able to form bone and establish the bone marrow microenvironment following in vivo implantation at early population doublings2,25,26. For simplicity, will refer to this model as hBMSC for the remained of this manuscript. We also used its transformed counterpart (hBMSC-Tum), which spontaneously arose during long-term culturing27. Both cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 4500 mg/l d-glucose, 4 mM l-glutamine, 110 mg/l sodium pyruvate, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin–streptomycin, and nonessential amino acids as previously described2.
Lentiviral transduction and pre-miR transfection
Transduction was performed in accordance with our previously published protocols28. Briefly, lentiviral particles encoding for human LIN28B (LP-OL05603-LX304-0200-S) or control lentiviral particles mCherry (LP-MCHR-LV105-0205) were purchased from Genecopoeia Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA). The hBMSC cells (1.5 × 105) were seeded into 24-well plates with complete DMEM. Twenty-four hours later, after the cells had obtained approximately 80% confluency, the medium was removed and 20 μl of crude lentiviral particles in 500 μl of DMEM + 5% heat-inactivated serum (Invitrogen) and 1% Pen–Strep supplemented with polybrene (8 μg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added to the cells. Seventy-two hours later, the medium was removed and transduced cells were selected with puromycin (1 μg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 week or until stably transduced cells were generated.
The pre-miR-negative control, pre-miR hsa-let-7b-5p, scrambled siRNA control, and siRNA targeting human LIN28B were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Transfection was performed using a reverse transfection approach as previously described17. Briefly, pre-miRs or siRNA at a final concentration of 30 nM was diluted in 50 μl of Opti-MEM (11058-021; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 1 μl of Lipofectamine 2000 (catalogue No. 52758; Invitrogen) was diluted in 50 μl OPTI-MEM. The diluted pre-miR, siRNA, and Lipofectamine 2000 were mixed and incubated at ambient temperature for 20 min. Twenty microliters of transfection mixture was added to the tissue culture plate and subsequently 10,000 cells in 60 μl transfection medium (complete DMEM without antibiotics) were added to each well. Twenty-four hours later, the transfection cocktail was replaced with complete DMEM.
Gene and miRNA expression profiling
RNA isolation, and the expression profiling of genes and miRNA were performed according to our previously published protocols17,28,29. In brief, total RNA was isolated using a Total Tissue RNA Purification Kit from Norgen-Biotek Corp. (Thorold, ON, Canada) and was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Total RNA was labeled and then hybridized with an Agilent Human SurePrint G3 Human GE 8 × 60 k or Human 8 × 60 k miRNA microarray chip (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All microarray experiments were conducted at the Microarray Core Facility in the Stem Cell Unit, Department of Anatomy, King Saud University College of Medicine. Data were subsequently normalized and analyzed using GeneSpring 13.0 software (Agilent Technologies). Pathway analyses were conducted using the Single Experiment Pathway analysis feature in GeneSpring 13.0. A twofold cut-off with P < 0.05 was used. Target prediction was conducted using the TargetScan database and the built-in feature of GeneSpring 13.0.
Gene set enrichment and modeling of gene interactions networks
Up and downregulated genes which are predicted targets of differentially expressed miRNAs in the hBMSC-Tum line were imported into the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) software (Ingenuity Systems; www.ingenuity.com/) and were subjected to functional annotations and regulatory network analysis using upstream regulator analysis (URA), downstream effects analysis (DEA), mechanistic networks (MN) and causal network analysis (CNA) prediction algorithms. The p value is the negative log of P and represents the possibility that focus genes in the network being found together by chance. Z score corresponds to the enrichment of particular functional category30,31.
mRNA and miRNA validation by qRT-PCR
Expression levels of the mRNAs were validated using SYBR Green-based quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) with an Applied Biosystems ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System as previously described17. The total RNA (500 ng) was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcript Kit (catalogue No. 4368814; ABI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Relative levels of mRNA were determined using the cDNA as template in real-time PCR analysis using the Applied Biosystems ViiA 7 System. Primer sequences used in the current study are listed in Table 1. The relative expression levels were calculated using the −ΔΔCT method. The housekeeping gene for β-actin was used as an endogenous control. For miRNA validation, 10 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed using a TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (catalogue No. 4366596; ABI) and the relative miRNA expression levels were determined using TaqMan Universal Master Mix II, no UNG (catalogue No. 4440040; ABI). The relative expression levels were calculated using the −ΔΔCT method. RNU44 was used as an endogenous control.
Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry (FACS)
Immunophenotypic analysis was performed in accordance with our previously published protocols32. In brief, cells were harvested and washed twice in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin and resuspended at 106 cells/ml. Then, 10 μl of mouse anti-human CD24-FITC and HLADR-PE conjugated antibodies (from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) was added to 100 μl of cell suspension. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark, washed with PBS, resuspended in 500 μl of PBS, and analyzed using a Navios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Living cells were gated in a dot plot of forward vs. side scatter signals obtained on linear scale after being analyzed with appropriate negative control using FITC and PE-conjugated mouse IgG1 isotype control for nonspecific background. Minimum 5000-gated events were acquired on a log fluorescence scale. Data were further analyzed using Kaluza software (1.2 version, Beckman Coulter). For cell cycle analysis, cell pellets were collected and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then were resuspended in 1 ml of FACS buffer (PBS/0.5% BSA), and then 3 ml of ice-cold 70% ethanol was added to fix the cells for 1 h on ice. Cell pellets were subsequently centrifuged, and re-suspended in 500 μL of PBS supplemented with 40 µg/mL RNAse A (Sigma) and 50 µg/mL propidium iodine (PI), before being analyzed using a Navious flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). Staining was detected in the green fluorescence channel (FL1) and the data were analyzed by Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter).
Cell migration
Real-time measurement of cell migration was performed using the xCELLigence RTCA DP system (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA) as described previously28. Briefly, cells were starved for 24 h in media containing 1% serum, followed by seeding 8.0 × 104 cells per well in 16-well microelectronic sensor plates with two-chamber trans-well inserts (CIM-plate insert; ACEA Bioscience) containing the appropriate serum conditions. Medium containing 10% serum (chemo-attractant) or 1% serum (control) was added to the bottom chambers of the wells.
Measurement of cell viability and colony formation
Viability of the negative control cells compared to the pre-miR Let-7b or si-LIN28B cells (hBMSC-Tum) was determined using an alamarBlue assay as previously described28. All assays were carried out with the appropriate controls. Briefly, 1 × 104 cells were cultured in 96-well plates and the cell viability measured at the indicated time points by adding 10% volume alamarBlue assay reagent and measuring the fluorescence at excitation and emission wavelengths of 530 nm and 590 nm, respectively.
The colony forming ability of the control cells compared to the pre-miR Let-7b or si-LIN28B cells (hBMSC-Tum), hBMSC-LIN28B cells, and hBMSC-mCherry cells was determined using a clonogenic assay as previously described29. Briefly, cells were seeded into 12-well plates at different concentrations of serial diluted cells (1:2 to 1:64), with an initial seeding density of 1.5 × 104 cells per well and incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 10 d. The plates were then washed and stained using a Diff-Quik staining set (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics). The plates were scanned and the number of colonies was evaluated under light microscopy.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (Pierce Inc, Thermo Scientific, USA) containing 1 × Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Pierce Inc., Thermo Scientific). Samples containing 30 µg of total protein were electrophoretically separated and blotted using the Bio-Rad V3 Western Workflow system according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Immunoblotting was performed using anti-LIN28B rabbit monoclonal antibody (Ab191881, 1:2000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA). The primary antibody was incubated overnight at 4 °C. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit was used as the secondary antibody, whereas HRP-conjugated anti-GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) antibody (1:1000; Invitrogen) was used as a loading control. Chemiluminescent detection was performed using WesternSure Chemiluminescent Substrate (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Band intensities were quantified using the band quantification tool in Image Laboratory 5.0 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Measurement of apoptosis and cell death
Fluorescence-based analysis of apoptosis and the evaluation of dead cells were performed after exposure of the cells to different concentrations of doxorubicin (7.8 nM to 125 nM), using an acridine orange and ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining method as previously described32. Briefly, after treatment, the two groups of cells, hBMSC control vs. hBMSC-Tum and hBMSC-mCherry control vs. hBMSC-LIN28B cells were stained with dual fluorescent staining solution (1 µl) containing 100 µg/ml AO and 100 µg/ml EB (AO/EB, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Cells were washed twice with PBS and gently mixed with AO/EB dye solution (1:100) for 1 min. After staining, the cells were evaluated and photographed using a Nikon Eclipse Ti fluorescence microscope and quantified. Cells cultured without drug were considered experimental controls. AO/EB staining uses the combination of two dyes to visualize cells with aberrant chromatin organization, apoptotic bodies, cytoplasmic changes, and dead cells. The differential uptake of AO/EB allows for the identification of viable and non-viable cells.
In vivo tumorigenicity assays in immune deficient SCID mice
In vivo tumor formation was performed as previously described27. Briefly, six- to eight-week-old female immunodeficient mice (NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J) were utilized in the xenograft experiments. Ten million hBMSC-mCherry or hBMSC-LIN28B cells were mixed 1:1 with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and subcutaneously injected into the right flank of SCID mice. Tumor mass was assessed on day 33 post implantation. At the end of the experiment, tumors were excised, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned on a microtome. Sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Expression and survival analyses of The Cancer Genome Atlas sarcoma dataset
Correlation between the expression of LIN28B, HMGA2, and LET-7b in sarcoma patients was assessed using the starBase Pan-Cancer database33. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis for the expression of LIN28B and HMGA2 in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) sarcoma dataset, which included 260 patients for overall survival (OS) and 231 patients for disease-free survival (DFS), was conducted as previously described32. The log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance in the curve comparison analysis.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses and graph generation were performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). P-values were calculated using the two-tailed t test. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Data Availability
Processed data are provided as supplementary datasets.
References
Mohseny, A. B. & Hogendoorn, P. C. Concise review: mesenchymal tumors: when stem cells go mad. Stem Cells 29(3), 397–403 (2011).
Simonsen, J. L. et al. Telomerase expression extends the proliferative life-span and maintains the osteogenic potential of human bone marrow stromal cells. Nat Biotechnol 20(6), 592–596 (2002).
Li, N. et al. Genetically transforming human mesenchymal stem cells to sarcomas: changes in cellular phenotype and multilineage differentiation potential. Cancer 115(20), 4795–4806 (2009).
Rodriguez, R., Rubio, R. & Menendez, P. Modeling sarcomagenesis using multipotent mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Res 22(1), 62–77 (2012).
Ladanyi, M. The emerging molecular genetics of sarcoma translocations. Diagnostic molecular pathology: the American journal of surgical pathology, part B 4(3), 162–173 (1995).
Brohl, A. S. et al. Frequent inactivating germline mutations in DNA repair genes in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 19(8), 955–958 (2017).
de Alava, E. et al. EWS-FLI1 fusion transcript structure is an independent determinant of prognosis in Ewing’s sarcoma. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 16(4), 1248–1255 (1998).
Subramanian, S. et al. MicroRNA expression signature of human sarcomas. Oncogene 27(14), 2015–2026 (2008).
Baird, K. et al. Gene expression profiling of human sarcomas: insights into sarcoma biology. Cancer research 65(20), 9226–9235 (2005).
Nakayama, R. et al. Gene expression analysis of soft tissue sarcomas: characterization and reclassification of malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Modern pathology: an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc 20(7), 749–759 (2007).
Alajez, N. M. et al. Lin28b promotes head and neck cancer progression via modulation of the insulin-like growth factor survival pathway. Oncotarget 3(12), 1641–1652 (2012).
Viswanathan, S. R. et al. Lin28 promotes transformation and is associated with advanced human malignancies. Nature genetics 41(7), 843–848 (2009).
Edmonson, J. H. et al. Randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus ifosfamide plus doxorubicin or mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin against advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 11(7), 1269–1275 (1993).
Boyerinas, B. et al. Let-7 modulates acquired resistance of ovarian cancer to Taxanes via IMP-1-mediated stabilization of multidrug resistance 1. International journal of cancer 130(8), 1787–1797 (2012).
Yang, X. et al. Inhibition of c-Myc by let-7b mimic reverses mutidrug resistance in gastric cancer cells. Oncology reports 33(4), 1723–1730 (2015).
Burns, J. S. et al. Tumorigenic heterogeneity in cancer stem cells evolved from long-term cultures of telomerase-immortalized human mesenchymal stem cells. Cancer research 65(8), 3126–3135 (2005).
Vishnubalaji, R. et al. Genome-wide mRNA and miRNA expression profiling reveal multiple regulatory networks in colorectal cancer. Cell death & disease 6, e1614 (2015).
Heo, I. et al. TUT4 in concert with Lin28 suppresses microRNA biogenesis through pre-microRNA uridylation. Cell 138(4), 696–708 (2009).
Piskounova, E. et al. Lin28A and Lin28B inhibit let-7 microRNA biogenesis by distinct mechanisms. Cell 147(5), 1066–1079 (2011).
Hanna, J. et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462(7273), 595–601 (2009).
Thornton, J. E. & Gregory, R. I. How does Lin28 let-7 control development and disease? Trends Cell Biol 22(9), 474–482 (2012).
Busch, B. et al. The oncogenic triangle of HMGA2, LIN28B and IGF2BP1 antagonizes tumor-suppressive actions of the let-7 family. Nucleic acids research 44(8), 3845–3864 (2016).
Iliopoulos, D., Hirsch, H. A. & Struhl, K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell 139(4), 693–706 (2009).
Madison, B. B. et al. LIN28B promotes growth and tumorigenesis of the intestinal epithelium via Let-7. Genes & development 27(20), 2233–2245 (2013).
Al-Nbaheen, M. et al. Human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue and skin exhibit differences in molecular phenotype and differentiation potential. Stem Cell Rev 9(1), 32–43 (2013).
Eskildsen, T. et al. MicroRNA-138 regulates osteogenic differentiation of human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(15), 6139–6144 (2011).
Serakinci, N. et al. Adult human mesenchymal stem cell as a target for neoplastic transformation. Oncogene 23(29), 5095–5098 (2004).
Vishnubalaji, R. et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) induces growth suppression and enhances chemosensitivity of human colon cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int 16, 77 (2016).
Vishnubalaji, R. et al. MicroRNA-320 suppresses colorectal cancer by targeting SOX4, FOXM1, and FOXQ1. Oncotarget 7(24), 35789–35802 (2016).
Bredel, M. et al. A network model of a cooperative genetic landscape in brain tumors. JAMA 302(3), 261–275 (2009).
Kramer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. Jr. & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 30(4), 523–530 (2014).
Vishnubalaji, R. et al. Molecular profiling of ALDH1(+) colorectal cancer stem cells reveals preferential activation of MAPK, FAK, and oxidative stress pro-survival signalling pathways. Oncotarget 9(17), 13551–13564 (2018).
Li, J. H., Liu, S., Zhou, H., Qu, L. H. & Yang, J. H. StarBase v2.0: decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic acids research 42(Database issue), D92–97 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University (Research Group No. RG-1438-033) for funding this work. The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research and RSSU at King Saud University for their technical support. The Qatar National Library funded the publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.V., R.E., M.Al.-T., M.M., A.Al.-R., L.H., N.D., M.A. and R.H., performed experiments; R.V. wrote manuscript; M.A., A.A. and M.K. conceived the study; M.K., provided materials and edited manuscript; N.M.A. conceived study, obtained funding, edited and approved final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vishnubalaji, R., Elango, R., Al-Toub, M. et al. Neoplastic Transformation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Mediated via LIN28B. Sci Rep 9, 8101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44536-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44536-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Revisiting the role of mesenchymal stromal cells in cancer initiation, metastasis and immunosuppression
Experimental Hematology & Oncology (2024)
-
DiPRO1 distinctly reprograms muscle and mesenchymal cancer cells
EMBO Molecular Medicine (2024)
-
TA-MSCs, TA-MSCs-EVs, MIF: their crosstalk in immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment
Journal of Translational Medicine (2022)
-
Transcriptional alterations of protein coding and noncoding RNAs in triple negative breast cancer in response to DNA methyltransferases inhibition
Cancer Cell International (2021)
-
Molecular mechanisms underpinning sarcomas and implications for current and future therapy
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2021)