Abstract
The morphological analysis of the end of boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) can provide valuable insight into the growth mechanism in high temperature pressure (HTP) laser ablation where the best quality of BNNT materials can be obtained so far. Two growth modes of BNNT coexisting during the synthesis process have been proposed based on HR-TEM observation and length analysis. One is the root growth mode, in which boron nitride (BN) species formed via the surface interaction between surrounding N2 molecules and boron nanodroplets incorporate into the tubular structure. Another mode called open-end growth mode means the prolongation of tube growth from the exposed BN edge surrounding the surface of boron nanodroplets which is constructed by the heterogeneous nucleation of absorbed BN radicals from the gas plume. The statistical data, the proportions of end structures and the length of BNNTs, could be fitted to two growth modes, and the open-end growth mode is found to be especially effective in producing longer nanotubes with a higher growth rate. The scientific understanding of the growth mechanism is believed to provide the control for optimized production of BNNTs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) share some fundamental similarities in atomic structure with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in which sp2 hybridized boron and nitrogen atoms replace the carbon and arrange themselves in a hexagonal network. Because of the polarity of the B-N bond caused by the difference in electronegativity between boron (2.04) and nitrogen (3.04)1,2, the charge distribution in BNNT is asymmetric where electrons charge is spatially confined to nitrogen atoms, resulting in insulating behavior with a wide bandgap (5~6 eV)3,4. In contrast to CNT, the electrical property of BNNT is independent of the diameter and chirality of the nanotube3. Besides having several characteristics similar to CNT, such as superb mechanical strength5,6,7,8 and high thermal conductivity9,10, BNNTs also possess many distinct and exceptional properties, for example, high neutron absorption11, piezoelectricity11,12,13, high temperature oxidation resistance14, and biocompatibility15.
For decades, CNTs have earned a high reputation as one of the most studied nanomaterials, thanks to advances in its fabrication methods16,17,18 that guarantee high quality and a bulk quantity of the CNTs needed for fundamental research. Developing an efficient synthesis route for BNNTs, on the other hand, is particularly difficult. To date, most BNNT synthesis techniques follow the same approaches that have been previously applied to produce CNT, such as arc discharge19,20,21,22, laser ablation23,24,25,26, ball milling27,28,29,30, and chemical vapor deposition31,32,33, but with efficiency far behind CNT synthesis. In recent years, the progress on BNNT synthesis has made revolutionary steps toward producing high-quality BNNTs coming from the development of high temperature pressure (HTP) laser ablation34 and an advanced thermal plasma process35,36. BNNTs acquired by these methods have high crystallinity, small diameter, and few walls, and are readily commercialized. It was previously reported that thermal plasma-based methods could induce an unprecedentedly high production rate, thus, showing promising potential for BNNT synthesis at an industrial scale. For instance, hydrogen-assisted induction thermal plasma presented by Kim et al. at NRC produced high-quality BNNTs at the rate of 20 g/h, without using a metal catalyst35. They also suggested a growth mechanism of BNNTs in this method involving the catalytic activity of hydrogen37. An extended-pressure inductively coupled plasma system that offers excellent flexibility in the use of various boron precursors, developed by Zettle’s group from UC Berkeley, can yield BNNTs at an even higher rate (35 g/h); however, the purity of the final products is slightly inferior, because a minority of other boron nitride byproducts (nanoribbon, nanococoon) are also attained36.
For HTP laser ablation, the synthesis process is carried out at an elevated nitrogen pressure that is two to 20 times higher than atmospheric pressure34. Besides high crystallinity, and having few walls, the produced BNNTs bear an exceptional aspect ratio (length to diameter ratio). The productivity in this method, however, is only at gram scale, significantly lower than that in other thermal plasma processes, presumably because of the nature of the laser ablation process, in which the reaction zone is spatially confined in a small volume of molten boron limited by the size of the laser beam. Nonetheless, the potential for improving production efficiency in HTP laser ablation is predictable, but any attempts to do so requires a comprehensive understanding of the growth mechanism of BNNT that has not yet been acheived. Smith et al. at the NASA Langley Research Center reported that the growth of BNNTs was mostly root-based when ascending in the gas plume; however, their report was fairly inconclusive34. Moreover, a simulation modeling of laser vaporization presented by Gnoffo et al. at NASA provided some important information about the growth process, although its validity is not scientifically confirmed yet, because of the lack of experimental evidence38.
Herein, we proposed two growth modes of BNNT coexisting in HTP laser ablation based on the morphology of the nanotube from the HR-TEM analysis. Important structural features at the end of nanotubes, such as encapsulated boron nanoparticles or a capped h-BN layer, are discussed comprehensively, and the details can offer some valuable suggestions on the initial stages of the nucleation and growth process of BNNTs. Also, we further analyzed the differences of end structures and evaluated the growth rate in each mode by measuring the length of nanotubes. We expect that the two growth models introduced in this study in combination with previous theoretical studies can be applied to develop an optimal route for BNNT synthesis in the laser ablation method.
Experimental Section
BNNT synthesis
The HTP laser ablation system (Laser oscillator, Laser C3000C, FANUC) for BNNT synthesis is shown in Fig. 1a. BNNTs were synthesized in a chamber specially designed, based on the reported HTP BNNT process34,38, to withstand high pressure and high temperature conditions. A bundle consisting of 70 boron fibers, each 102 μm in diameter, tied to a feeder, was placed in the center of the chamber filled with 14 bar of nitrogen (purity 99.999%). The number of boron fibers was optimized experimentally. If there were too many boron fibers, the bundle was not successfully melted, resulting in a decrease in yield. The bundle was irradiated continuously by a CO2 laser (wavelength 10.6 μm, original beam diameter 2 cm) focused down to 1 mm by a ZnSe lens throughout the synthesis process. We carried out in situ thermal analysis and close observation of the laser heating process by using a high-speed camera (Phantom Miro M110, Vision Research) and optical emission spectrometer (OES, Shamrock 500i, Andor).
The schematic of the laser ablation process in the BNNT synthesis is shown in Fig. 1b. The boron fibrous bundle was heated by 1000 W continuous CO2 laser, forming a spherical molten boron ball that had a temperature of 3845 K as measured by OES (Fig. S1). The temperature of the boron ball where it was directly irradiated by the laser could reach 5101 K, achieving the boiling point of boron at 14 bar, calculated from the Clausius-Clapeyron equation38, and causing the evaporation of the boron species. The gas plume rose vertically from the boron ball because of the buoyancy effect exerted by the surrounding N2. According to previous reports on BNNT synthesis in HTP laser ablation, the nucleation and growth of BNNTs were presumed to take place in the rising gas plume34. Cotton-like BNNT products were collected in collectors installed at different heights (1 cm and 13 cm) above the molten boron ball for qualitative comparison.
Characterization
We conducted morphological and chemical analyses of raw BNNTs by using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, NOVA Nano SEM 450, FEI), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM, Tecnai G2 F20, FEI), electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha ESCA System, Thermo Scientific, Al Kα 1486.6 eV), and Raman spectroscopy (inVia, Renishaw, Ar laser λ = 514 nm). For length measurement, a BNNT solution was cast uniformly on a Si substrate by spray coating and subsequently dried at 60 °C for 24 hours. For preparation of the BNNT solution (as reported elsewhere39), the raw BNNT product was dispersed in DMAc solvent (0.25 mg/ml) by using bath sonication at low power for 30 minutes. We used FE-SEM to characterize separated BNNTs on the Si substrate. We measured the length of hundreds of BNNTs by using the Image J Program (NIH, USA) in FE-SEM images (Fig. S2). The proportions of the end structures were directly identified in the HR-TEM analysis.
Results and Discussion
The cotton-like as-synthesized BNNTs were deposited on the collector as shown in Fig. 2a. The bright gray color of the sample represents a relatively high level of purity. The SEM image in Fig. 2b of the obtained BNNTs in HTP laser ablation shows the uniform distribution of entangled nanotubes with lengths up to more than 1 µm (Fig. S3a). Further details on the morphology of BNNTs were revealed in the HR-TEM analysis. As shown in Fig. 2c, we observed a variety of boron nitride nanostructures, such as BNNTs, h-BN, and boron nanoparticles in both collected samples. Most of the BNNTs, existing in either single tube or bundle form, had an average internal diameter of 4 nm, with the number of walls ranging from two to five, and high crystallinity (Fig. S3b). The stoichiometry of the nanotubes was determined in EELS measurement simultaneously with HR-TEM. The electron energy-loss spectrum in Fig. 2d displayed two prominent absorption peaks, located at 188 eV and 401 eV, corresponding to the K edges of boron and nitrogen, respectively19. A clear π* peak and σ* peak in both B-K and N-K edge regions are the signatures of sp2 hybridization40. The bonding states and chemical composition were further confirmed by XPS measurement (Fig. 2e). The atomic ratio of B to N ratio calculated from the high-resolution XPS peaks was close to 1:1, same as a result taken from EELS quantification analysis and in agreement with the stoichiometry ratio of B to N in a hexagonal boron nitride. The Raman spectrum of BNNTs in Fig. 2f exhibited a single peak at 1366.1 cm−1 corresponding to the E2g phonon mode of a hexagonal boron nitride structure41.
In most of the studies on one-dimensional tubular structures, the characteristics of a tube’s end provides valuable information about the growth process. From HR-TEM data as shown in Fig. 3, we recognized three characteristic features of the tip-ends of BNNTs: flat-closed, open, and nanoparticle-encapsulated (NP) end. We observed two distinguishable nanoparticle-encapsulated end structures in the HR-TEM analysis. In the NP1 end (Fig. 3c), tubular structure was grown directly from the surface of boron nanodroplets, whereas in the NP2 end (Fig. 3d), a BN nanotube was developed from polygonized h-BN layers wrapping around boron nanodroplets. These features at the ends are significant distinctions between CNTs and BNNTs. The hemispherical end in CNTs results from the formation of pentagonal and heptagonal defects in the atomic structure. These analogous defects in BNNTs would cause the energetically unfavorable B-B, and N-N bonds42 to destabilize the nanotube’s structure. Thus, to stop growing by capping, even-numbered rings, such as squares and octagons, are preferred, resulting in flat ends43. Furthermore, boron nanoparticles are commonly found at either end of the nanotubes, and they are still prevalent even in the catalytic synthesis. Metal catalysts, however, are rarely found at the end of BNNTs, and this is fundamentally opposed to the growth of CNTs, where growth is generally triggered from catalytic particles. Interestingly, BNNTs could start growing from the wrapped h-BN layer covered boron nanoparticles (Fig. 3d) or from the boron particle itself (Fig. 3c). This distinct feature on the origin of tube growth can give us some hints about a growth mechanism and will be thoroughly discussed in this study.
The formation of BNNTs is expected to be similar to that of CNTs, because BNNT has a similar hexagonal lattice tube structure with boron and nitrogen atoms by sp2 hybridization, and also a similar tube end structure. The generally accepted mechanism for the growth of CNTs in high temperature synthesis techniques, such as laser ablation and arc discharge, is a vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) model44. For CNTs, the model assumes that the first stage is the formation of a liquid metal carbide particle by the condensation of carbon and metal atoms from the vapor phase. Under the influence of the temperature and concentration gradient, solid-phase nanotubes begin to grow when metal particles become supersaturated with carbon species. After reaching the solubility limits, carbon species dissolved in the particles diffuse through the particles, begin to precipitate out, and form a graphitic cap on the surface (i.e., dissolution-precipitation mechanism). As carbon is continuously absorbed from surrounding carbon sources, the graphitic cap subsequently evolves into a cylindrical structure. This formation process is a well-known root growth mechanism. A similar scenario would happen in the growth of BNNTs. However, boron particles are more commonly found as the growth support of nanotube than are metal particles, and the dissolution-precipitation mechanism is no longer valid. The NP 1 end structures (Fig. 3c) strongly suggest that the formation of BNNT follows the VLS model.
The root-based growth mechanism of BNNT has also been previously reported25,26,34,45,46,47 in the arc discharge and laser ablation processes. In HTP laser ablation, the boron fibers are initially heated by the laser in 14 bar of nitrogen inside the chamber and melted down, forming a macroscopic boron ball. When reaching boiling temperature (5101 K), the boron ball starts evaporating, generating a vertical gas plume. Once the boron vapor in the gas plume condenses into molten boron nanodroplets as the temperature decreases, the root growth of BNNTs is initiated and proceeds as follows.
As shown in Fig. 4a, (i) N2 molecules from the surrounding penetrate into the subsurface of boron nanodroplets that are condensed from boron vapor that has evaporated from the surface of the macroscopic boron target. Because of the high chemical reactivity in the liquid phase48,49,50, boron can dissociate nitrogen molecules into individual atoms47. (ii) These nitrogen atoms migrate on the surface under the influence of surface diffusion, forming BN species, and subsequently assemble into a hexagonal structured BN cap. The nitrogen atoms on the outer surface of the boron droplet diffuse towards the boundary of the BN cap, where they combine with boron atoms, allowing the cap to progressively evolve into a cylindrical structure. (iii) A BNNT is subsequently elongated out of the nanodroplets and grows because of the continuous incorporation of nitrogen and boron atoms at the root of the tubular structure.
The NP 1 end structure of the BNNT in Fig. 3c can be explained by the root growth mechanism. In this process, the boron nanodroplets serve not only as a growth support but also as a boron reservoir; therefore, they will be steadily consumed when the temperature is in favor of tube growing, and if the growth happens long enough, these nanodroplets could be eventually devoured, leaving the end of BNNTs opened (Fig. 3b). Otherwise, h-BN layers can be formed from the nucleation of surface BN species when boron nanodroplets are solidified in a low temperature regime. The initial step of root growth involves interaction between nitrogen molecules and liquid boron droplets; however, there have not been many systematic studies of nitrogen behavior on the surface of boron droplets that directly leads to the formation of a boron nitride tubular structure. Recently, a theoretical model was developed by Santra et al. to simulate the root growth of BNNT in arc discharge47. In their study, the dynamics of nitrogen atoms and the formation of a tubular structure from a BN cap on the surface of boron droplets was demonstrated in a way that genuinely supported the root growth mechanism. The optimal temperature regime facilitating the tube’s growth ranged narrowly from 2000 to 2400 K, although their simulation was carried out in a sub-atmospheric pressure condition where the temperature was the only factor governing growth process. The atomistic phenomena in laser ablation at an especially elevated pressure (14 bar) would be more intense when taking into consideration the influence of the pressure factor. We presumed that the nitrogen molecules in this condition are allowed to penetrate and dissociate in the subsurface region of boron droplets. In consequence, this would lead to a significant boost in the growth rate of BNNT because of the increase of superficial nitrogen atoms. Similarly, the penetration of nitrogen molecules also took place in a macroscopic boron target, where it resulted in the formation of multilayer h-BN films coated on the surface of the target after synthesis (Fig. S4).
Although there is a possibility that the root growth mechanism can produce open-end nanotubes when boron droplets are fully consumed, that is not likely to happen at the bottom part of the gas plume, considering that the root growth will be disrupted when deposited on the low-height collector (1 cm). Also, it is worth mentioning that the NP2 end structure (Fig. 3d), in which the tubular structure grows from the outer h-BN layers and the growth of BNNTs seemed not to be affected by reactive liquid boron droplets, because the boron nanoparticle (NP2) was encapsulated inside the h-BN layers. Therefore, the root growth mechanism itself cannot fully explain the formation of a considerable proportion of the open and NP2 end structures of BNNTs in the high temperature region close to the boron macroscopic target (1 cm). The detailed proportion of BNNT ends will be discussed.
The second mechanism we proposed herein is based on heterogeneous nucleation and growth of BNNTs from the supersaturated flow of BN vapor, and is probably responsible for the formation of the majority of open and NP2 end BNNTs. To distinguish it from the root growth mechanism, we called it the “open-end growth” mechanism. The source of BNNT growth in this mechanism is the surrounding BN radicals originating from the gas-phase reaction B2 + N2 → 2BN (B2-N2 direct reaction) in the proximity of the macroscopic boron ball. Even in the extreme conditions in the laser ablation process, we suspect that a very high density of BN radicals would populate in the area very close to the boron ball. Gnoffo’s simulation model further theoretically confirms our speculation38. Referring to Fig. 5a, the simulation indicated that the high temperature a few millimeters above the boron ball combined with the high pressure environment could decompose molecular nitrogen and form a significant level of BN radicals at the base of the gas plume. These radicals decay into B2 and N2 when rising in a gas plume of mixed gases (B, B2, N, N2, BN), leading to the decrease of BN density in the higher area38. Similar to root growth, open-end growth starts when boron nanodroplets are condensed and advances in the following steps.
As shown in Fig. 4b, (i) the BN radicals are physically adsorbed on the surface of boron nanodroplets. When these radicals attain supersaturation, heterogeneous nucleation of h-BN layers on the outer surface will occur. (ii) Newly formed h-BN layers, grown by self-assembling of BN radicals and wrapping around boron nanodroplets, subsequently transform into the cylindrical structure extending from the NP2 end structure in Fig. 3d. (iii) BN radicals are continuously incorporated into the tubular structure at the growing open end. This is the physisorption of BN radicals on dangling bonds at the end of the nanotube.
The major difference between the open-end growth mechanism and root growth is the way BN species are supplied to the formation of the nanotube. Outer h-BN layers, once formed, will expansively cover boron nanodroplets, preventing them from interacting with molecular nitrogen in the open-end growth. For this reason, boron nanodroplets remain intact throughout a tube’s growth and simply serve as growth support. BN source for the growth process mainly comes from the surroundings, instead of from the boron droplet’s surface. Since the open-end growth mechanism exclusively relies on surrounding BN radicals, the significant depletion of BN density at a few centimeters above the macroscopic boron ball when boron nanodroplets move upward in the gas plume can disrupt the growth process, leading to the formation of the open-ended nanotube. To experimentally verify the proposed growth models, we collected BNNTs at two different parts of the vertical gas plume, 1 and 13 cm above the macroscopic boron target. As described above, once molten boron nanodroplet formed under 5101 K, the formation of BNNT will be initiated following root and open-end growth modes, simultaneously. However, most of BNNT growth by the open-end mode is finished at a low height, where BN radicals are populated with the highest density. On the other hand, the root-grown BNNTs will evolve continuously, as they rise up in the plume, as long as boron nanodroplets are maintained in a molten state, increasing the possibility that boron nanodroplets can be consumed entirely. The total process of dual growth modes in HTP laser ablation is shown in Fig. 5a. We compared BNNTs collected at 1 and 13 cm to identify the major difference between the two growth modes. In particular, the change in the end structure and the length of BNNTs will indicate the growth mode they followed.
The proportion of each type of end structures shows a noticeable difference between the bottom (1 cm) and top (13 cm) parts of the gas plume (See graph in Fig. 5b,c). In the BNNTs sample obtained at the bottom part, the NP ends are dominant with 53.4 ± 2.1%, followed up by 20.4 ± 1.8% of the closed end, and 26.2 ± 1.9% of the open end. In the NP-ended BNNTs population, NP 1 and NP 2 types contribute 23.8 ± 1.5%, and 29.6 ± 2.5%, respectively, whereas most of the BNNTs collected in the upper part (13 cm), up to 42.4 ± 3.8%, are open ended. The proportion of NP-ended nanotubes that made up 36.2 ± 4.1% of the total number of BNNTs includes 6.8 ± 3.2% of NP 1 and 29.4 ± 3.5% of NP 2 type. The percentage of closed-end BNNTs remains almost the same, with 21.4 ± 2.9% compared to that of the bottom-part sample. The statistical data for end structures of BNNT were acquired from direct observation of one hundred of nanotube ends in HR-TEM analysis. The data was acquired in five repeated measurements of each synthesized sample, and average data are presented.
To explain the differences of end structure between the BNNTs collected at the top and bottom part of the gas plume, the height profile of temperature should be taken into consideration. In the root growth mode, the prerequisite condition for the growth of nanotubes is the liquid phase of the boron nanoparticles needed to trigger the dissociation of nitrogen molecules. Referring to the temperature profile from simulation modelling of HTP laser ablation38, the temperature in favor of the liquid state of boron element can be maintained at a few centimeters above the boron macroscopic target depending on the power of the laser heating. For the sample acquired at the height of 1 cm, the root growth of BNNTs is likely to be abruptly stopped when they are deposited on the collector hanging in the gas plume. One can expect that in this case, boron nanodroplets, which will not be expended entirely because of the cease of the tube’s growth, are ultimately be attached at the end of the nanotube (NP 1 end) and the opposite side is closed end. Also, the highest density of BN radicals near the surface of the boron ball would strongly promote the second growth mode of BNNT. Therefore, the combination of disrupted root growth with unconsumed nanodroplets and the open-end growth mode leads to the predominance of BNNTs having a nanoparticle-containing end, which account for half of the total number of obtained BNNTs. As described above, the NP 1 end (23.8 ± 1.5%) and close-ended nanotube (20.4 ± 1.8%) are distinct features of root growth, whereas the NP 2 end (29.6 ± 2.5%) and open-ended nanotube (26.2 ± 1.9%) belong to open-end growth (Fig. 5c). From the calculated proportions for each kind of end structures, the total number of the open-end grown BNNTs is larger than that of the root-grown BNNTs, indicating the higher efficiency of the open-end growth mechanism compared to the other in the bottom region of the gas plume. It should be noted that, because of the exceptional length of BNNTs, we were unable to observe the whole nanotube with both ends in TEM analysis; therefore the proportions of end structures featured in a particular growth mechanism are not necessarily equal; i.e., NP 1 vs. close end in root growth, or NP 2 vs. open end in open-end growth. On the other hand, the proportions of BNNT end structures obtained at the top position in the gas plume (13 cm) changed noticeably. Although the proportions of NP 2 end and closed end remained unaffected, there was a conversion from NP 1 end to the open-end structure. The percentage of NP 1 end was reduced from 23.8 ± 1.5% to 6.8 ± 3.2%, corresponding to the equal amount of increase in the proportion of open-end nanotubes, which is from 26.2 ± 1.9% to 42.4 ± 3.8% (Fig. 5b). As discussed in the previous section, the open-end growth mode of BNNTs hardly occurs in the top part of the gas plume, thus, it does not contribute significantly to the specific differences in the end structures of BNNTs. The main reason for the conversion should come from the prolongation of the root growth mode. The root growth can reach its limit as the boron nanodroplets rise along the gas plume, wholly passing the liquid phase, increasing the possibility that boron nanodroplets can be consumed entirely. The depletion of the boron reservoir results in the absence of boron nanoparticle at the end of the nanotube, leaving the tube opened.
According to our proposed mechanism, root growth must involve the dissociation of nitrogen molecules in the subsurface of boron nanodroplets, and this kind of process typically requires high activation energy, which is dependent on temperature and pressure. This is fundamentally in contrast to the open-end growth mechanism, which does not require that much activation energy, because BN radicals incorporated in the growth process are physically absorbed from the surroundings. Thus, we expected that root growth might happen more slowly than open-end growth mode does. As a result, BNNTs originating from the former are shorter than are BNNTs following the latter. To confirm this hypothesis, we measured the length of separated BNNTs uniformly coated on a silicon substrate.
In both samples, the lengths of BNNTs differed in a wide range, but were mainly distributed in two distinct regions, as shown in Fig. 6. As mentioned before, because of the difference in growth rate, the short BNNT domain in the length-distribution curve should be assigned to root growth, whereas the long BNNT domain is appointed to the open-end growth mode. In the root growth domain, the average length of BNNTs collected at the upper part increased by approximately 30%, compared to that of BNNT collected at the bottom part. The root growth mode will proceed as long as boron nanodroplets are maintained in the molten state. When we collected the sample at the height of 1 cm, the growth was generally terminated and unable to reach its limit, whease in the sample obtained at the higher position, the root growth was sustained until the boron nanodroplets were solidified or depleted, thus resulting in longer BNNTs. On the other hand, in the open-end growth domain, the average lengths of BNNTs collected at the top and bottom were almost comparable (903.88 nm, and 895.61 nm, respectively). As discussed above, this mechanism is the result of the adsorption of surrounding BN radicals onto boron nanodroplets. Because BN radicals were distributed predominantly in the proximity of the boron ball, we predicted that the open-end growth process may take place mainly in this area; so there would be no difference in the length of BNNTs acquired at the top and bottom parts of the gas plume. The spatial expansion of the BN radicals by additional plasma might possibly increase the yield and length of BNNTs, but as of now this remains as a future study.
Conclusions
In summary, we investigated the growth mechanism of BNNTs in high temperature pressure (HTP) laser ablation. Two growth modes, the root growth mechanism, and the open-end growth mechanism were proposed based on the differences in end structures of synthesized BNNTs. In the root growth mechanism, BN radicals created from the dissociation of nitrogen molecules in the subsurface of condensed boron nanodroplets contribute substantially to the formation of BNNTs at the interface between the BN cap and the boron nanodroplets. On the other hand, the open-end growth mechanism relies on the physisorption of BN radicals arising from the gas-phase reaction between the boron vapor and nitrogen molecules in the proximity of the boron ball. BNNTs grown by this mechanism consistently start growing from h-BN layers that are coating boron nanodroplets. The difference in measured proportions of end structures of BNNTs collected at different positions in the vertical gas plume suggests that the open-end growth occurs only in the area close to the boron ball’s surface, approximately 1 cm above, whereas root growth can be sustained at higher positions. Furthermore, two distinct domains in the length distribution curves extracted from BNNT length measurements further confirm the coexistence of the two mechanisms in laser ablation. The short BNNT domain in length distribution is attributed to the root growth process, whereas the long BNNT domain is ascribed to the open-end growth process. It is understandable that, because the activation energy in the physisorption of BN species on the surface of boron droplets is not considerable, the rate of open-end growth is expected to be higher than that of root growth. This could be the clue to the production of long BNNTs by exploiting the open-end growth process. We are aware that BNNT synthesis in HTP laser vaporization may involve many complex processes at the nanoscale, and the two growth modes proposed in this study may not adequately reflect the formation of BNNTs in extreme conditions. Despite this fact, we expect that our understanding of the growth mechanism of BNNT in this study may pave the way for mass production of BNNTs in a controlled manner. Furthermore, the two types of BNNTs (open and closed end) discovered in this study would be specifically used corresponding to their structural characteristics. For example, open-ended BNNTs could be used as channels in filters for water treatment51,52 providing a suitable molecular path, whereas the close-ended BNNTs could be used as a field emitter53 to increase the stability applying the dangling-bond-free cab structures to prevent oxidation. We expect that the unique properties and structures of BNNTs can be exploited in substantially more fields with increasing productivity.
References
Weng, Q., Wang, X., Wang, X., Bando, Y. & Golberg, D. Functionalized hexagonal boron nitride nanomaterials: emerging properties and applications. Chemical Society Reviews 45, 3989–4012, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00869G (2016).
Shin, H. et al. Covalent Functionalization of Boron Nitride Nanotubes via Reduction Chemistry. ACS Nano 9, 12573–12582, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b06523 (2015).
Blase, X., Rubio, A., Louie, S. G. & Cohen, M. L. Stability and Band Gap Constancy of Boron Nitride Nanotubes. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 28, 335 (1994).
Lauret, J. S. et al. Optical Transitions in Single-Wall Boron Nitride Nanotubes. Physical Review Letters 94, 037405 (2005).
Raul, A., Ming-Sheng, W., Zhi, X., Annick, L. & Dmitri, G. Young modulus, mechanical and electrical properties of isolated individual and bundled single-walled boron nitride nanotubes. Nanotechnology 22, 265704 (2011).
Hernández, E., Goze, C., Bernier, P. & Rubio, A. Elastic Properties of C and BxCyNz Composite Nanotubes. Physical Review Letters 80, 4502–4505 (1998).
Suryavanshi, A. P., Yu, M.-F., Wen, J., Tang, C. & Bando, Y. Elastic modulus and resonance behavior of boron nitride nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters 84, 2527–2529, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1691189 (2004).
Chopra, N. G. & Zettl, A. Measurement of the elastic modulus of a multi-wall boron nitride nanotube. Solid State Communications 105, 297–300, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(97)10125-9 (1998).
Chang, C. W. et al. Isotope Effect on the Thermal Conductivity of Boron Nitride Nanotubes. Physical Review Letters 97, 085901 (2006).
Stewart, D. A., Savić, I. & Mingo, N. First-Principles Calculation of the Isotope Effect on Boron Nitride Nanotube Thermal Conductivity. Nano Letters 9, 81–84, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl802503q (2009).
Kang, J. H. et al. Multifunctional Electroactive Nanocomposites Based on Piezoelectric Boron Nitride Nanotubes. ACS Nano 9, 11942–11950, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b04526 (2015).
Sai, N. & Mele, E. J. Microscopic theory for nanotube piezoelectricity. Physical Review B 68, 241405, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.241405 (2003).
Yamakov, V. et al. Piezoelectric and elastic properties of multiwall boron-nitride nanotubes and their fibers: A molecular dynamics study. Computational Materials Science 135, 29–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.050 (2017).
Chen, Y., Zou, J., Campbell, S. J. & Caer, G. L. Boron nitride nanotubes: Pronounced resistance to oxidation. Applied Physics Letters 84, 2430–2432, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1667278 (2004).
Chen, X. et al. Boron Nitride Nanotubes Are Noncytotoxic and Can Be Functionalized for Interaction with Proteins and Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 131, 890–891, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja807334b (2009).
Ebbesen, T. W. & Ajayan, P. M. Large-scale synthesis of carbon nanotubes. Nature 358, 220, https://doi.org/10.1038/358220a0 (1992).
Endo, M. et al. The production and structure of pyrolytic carbon nanotubes (PCNTs). Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 54, 1841–1848, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(93)90297-5 (1993).
Guo, T. et al. Self-Assembly of Tubular Fullerenes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 99, 10694–10697, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100027a002 (1995).
Chopra, N. G. et al. Boron Nitride Nanotubes. Science 269, 966–967, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5226.966 (1995).
Narita, I. & Oku, T. Synthesis of boron nitride nanotubes by using YB6 powder. Solid State Communications 122, 465–468, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(02)00188-6 (2002).
Loiseau, A., Willaime, F., Demoncy, N., Hug, G. & Pascard, H. Boron Nitride Nanotubes with Reduced Numbers of Layers Synthesized by Arc Discharge. Physical Review Letters 76, 4737–4740 (1996).
Cumings, J. & Zettl, A. Mass-production of boron nitride double-wall nanotubes and nanococoons. Chemical Physics Letters 316, 211–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01277-4 (2000).
Yu, D. P. et al. Synthesis of boron nitride nanotubes by means of excimer laser ablation at high temperature. Applied Physics Letters 72, 1966–1968, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.121236 (1998).
Zhou, G. W., Zhang, Z., Bai, Z. G. & Yu, D. P. Catalyst effects on formation of boron nitride nano-tubules synthesized by laser ablation. Solid State Communications 109, 555–559, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(98)00541-9 (1999).
Lee, R. S. et al. Catalyst-free synthesis of boron nitride single-wall nanotubes with a preferred zig-zag configuration. Physical Review B 64, 121405, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.121405 (2001).
Arenal, R., Stephan, O., Cochon, J.-L. & Loiseau, A. Root-Growth Mechanism for Single-Walled Boron Nitride Nanotubes in Laser Vaporization Technique. Journal of the American Chemical Society 129, 16183–16189, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja076135n (2007).
Chen, Y., Fitz Gerald, J., Williams, J. S. & Bulcock, S. Synthesis of boron nitride nanotubes at low temperatures using reactive ball milling. Chemical Physics Letters 299, 260–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)01252-4 (1999).
Chen, Y., Conway, M., Williams, J. S. & Zou, J. Large-quantity production of high-yield boron nitride nanotubes. Journal of Materials Research 17, 1896–1899, https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2002.0281 (2011).
Kim, J. et al. Synthesis and growth of boron nitride nanotubes by a ball milling–annealing process. Acta Materialia 59, 2807–2813, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.019 (2011).
Yu, J., Chen, Y., Wuhrer, R., Liu, Z. & Ringer, S. P. In Situ Formation of BN Nanotubes during Nitriding Reactions. Chemistry of Materials 17, 5172–5176, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm050966f (2005).
Ahmad, P., Khandaker, M. U., Khan, Z. R. & Amin, Y. M. Synthesis of boron nitride nanotubes via chemical vapour deposition: a comprehensive review. RSC Advances 5, 35116–35137, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA01594D (2015).
Lourie, O. R. et al. CVD Growth of Boron Nitride Nanotubes. Chemistry of Materials 12, 1808–1810, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm000157q (2000).
Kim, M. J. et al. Double-Walled Boron Nitride Nanotubes Grown by Floating Catalyst Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nano Letters 8, 3298–3302, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8016835 (2008).
Smith, M. W. et al. Very long single- and few-walled boron nitride nanotubes via the pressurized vapor/condenser method. Nanotechnology 20, 505604 (2009).
Kim, K. S. et al. Hydrogen-catalyzed, pilot-scale production of small-diameter boron nitride nanotubes and their macroscopic assemblies. ACS nano 8, 6211–6220 (2014).
Fathalizadeh, A., Pham, T., Mickelson, W. & Zettl, A. Scaled Synthesis of Boron Nitride Nanotubes, Nanoribbons, and Nanococoons Using Direct Feedstock Injection into an Extended-Pressure, Inductively-Coupled Thermal Plasma. Nano Letters 14, 4881–4886, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5022915 (2014).
Kim, K. S. et al. Role of Hydrogen in High-Yield Growth of Boron Nitride Nanotubes at Atmospheric Pressure by Induction Thermal Plasma. ACS nano 12, 884–893 (2018).
Gnoffo, P. A. & Fay, C. C. Laser Vaporization and Plume Chemistry in a Boron Nitride Nanotube Production Rig. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 27, 369–381 (2013).
Tiano, A. L. et al. Thermodynamic approach to boron nitride nanotube solubility and dispersion. Nanoscale 8, 4348–4359, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR08259E (2016).
Wibbelt, M., Kohl, H. & Kohler-Redlich, P. Multiple-scattering calculations of electron-energy-loss near-edge structures of existing and predicted phases in the ternary system B-C-N. Physical Review B 59, 11739–11745, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.11739 (1999).
Arenal, R. et al. Raman Spectroscopy of Single-Wall Boron Nitride Nanotubes. Nano Letters 6, 1812–1816, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0602544 (2006).
Blase, X., De Vita, A., Charlier, J. C. & Car, R. Frustration Effects and Microscopic Growth Mechanisms for BN Nanotubes. Physical Review Letters 80, 1666–1669, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1666 (1998).
Golberg, D., Bando, Y., Stéphan, O. & Kurashima, K. Octahedral boron nitride fullerenes formed by electron beam irradiation. Applied Physics Letters 73, 2441–2443, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122475 (1998).
Harris, P. J. F. Carbon Nanotube Science: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Altoe, M. V. P., Sprunck, J. P., Gabriel, J. C. P. & Bradley, K. Nanococoon seeds for BN nanotube growth. Journal of Materials Science 38, 4805–4810, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000004399.94881.57 (2003).
Yeh, Y.-W., Raitses, Y., Koel, B. E. & Yao, N. Stable synthesis of few-layered boron nitride nanotubes by anodic arc discharge. Scientific Reports 7, 3075, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03438-w (2017).
Santra, B. et al. Root-growth of boron nitride nanotubes: experiments and ab initio simulations. Nanoscale 10, 22223–22230, https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR06217J (2018).
Krishnan, S., Ansell, S., Felten, J. J., Volin, K. J. & Price, D. L. Structure of Liquid Boron. Physical Review Letters 81, 586–589, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.586 (1998).
Glorieux, B., Saboungi, M. L. & Enderby, J. E. Electronic conduction in liquid boron. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 56, 81 (2001).
Okada, J. T. et al. Visualizing the Mixed Bonding Properties of Liquid Boron with High-Resolution X-Ray Compton Scattering. Physical Review Letters 114, 177401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.177401 (2015).
Won, C. Y. & Aluru, N. R. Water Permeation through a Subnanometer Boron Nitride Nanotube. Journal of the American Chemical Society 129, 2748–2749, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0687318 (2007).
Liang, L. et al. Computer simulation of water desalination through boron nitride nanotubes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 19, 30031–30038, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP06230C (2017).
Song, Y. et al. Excellent oxidation endurance of boron nitride nanotube field electron emitters. Applied Physics Letters 104, 163102, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870655 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the KIST 4U ORP (Open Research Program), and the Technology Innovation Program (2000479) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.H. Kim designed the research and wrote the manuscript. H. Cho, T.V. Pham, and J.H. Hwang participated in the sample preparation and measurements. S. Ahn, S.G. Jang, H. Lee and C. Park discussed the results and revised the manuscript. C.S. Kim and M.J. Kim supervised the project. All authors approved this manuscript for publication.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.H., Cho, H., Pham, T.V. et al. Dual growth mode of boron nitride nanotubes in high temperature pressure laser ablation. Sci Rep 9, 15674 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52247-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52247-w
- Springer Nature Limited