Abstract
Prematurity, size at birth, and postnatal growth are important factors that determine cardiometabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes later in life. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the associations between the size at birth and growth velocity after birth with cardiometabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Fifty-six preterm infants born at < 32 weeks of gestation or having a birth weight of < 1500 g were enrolled and categorized into small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. Anthropometric and cardiometabolic parameters were assessed at school-age, and the Korean Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition (K-WISC-IV) was used for assessing the intellectual abilities. The growth velocity was calculated by changes in the weight z-score at each time period. Multivariate analysis was conducted to investigate the associations of growth velocity at different periods with cardiometabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Forty-two (75%) were classified as AGA and 25% as SGA. At school-age, despite the SGA children showing significantly lower body weight, lean mass index, and body mass index, there were no differences in the cardiometabolic parameters between SGA and AGA groups. After adjusting for gestational age, birth weight z-score, weight z-score change from birth to discharge and sex, change in weight z-score beyond 12 months were associated with a higher systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, and insulin resistance. Full-scale intelligent quotient (β = 0.314, p = 0.036) and perceptional reasoning index (β = 0.456, p = 0.003) of K-WISC-IV were positively correlated with postnatal weight gain in the neonatal intensive care unit. Although cardiometabolic outcomes were comparable in preterm SGA and AGA infants, the growth velocity at different time periods resulted in different cardiometabolic and neurocognitive outcomes. Thus, ensuring an optimal growth velocity at early neonatal period could promote good neurocognitive outcomes, while adequate growth after 1 year could prevent adverse cardiometabolic outcomes in preterm infants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Metabolic syndrome is known as one of risk factors that develop cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Though no consensus has been made on the diagnostic criteria in the pediatric population, it presents as a combination of central obesity, hypertension, high triglyceride levels, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and glucose intolerance. After Barker1 proposed that fetal and postnatal environment and growth could be contributing factors of metabolic syndrome, research on small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm infants has increased.
Several studies have reported SGA as a risk factor for adverse metabolic consequences in later life of term infants2,3,4,5. According to a Polish study2, children at pre-pubertal age who were born as SGA at term showed a high prevalence of particular components of metabolic syndrome. Numerous studies have also identified the effects of preterm birth on metabolic outcomes6,7,8,9,10,11. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported that preterm birth was associated with higher fat mass, blood glucose, insulin resistance, and total cholesterol level in adults7.
The role of SGA in metabolic outcomes in later life among preterm infants has been demonstrated in several studies. Huang et al.12 reported the risk of metabolic syndrome in preterm and/or SGA children. Lower insulin sensitivity at pre-pubertal age13 and elevated blood pressure after 31 years of follow-up14 were observed in preterm infants born as SGA, as compared to appropriate for gestational age (AGA) group. In contrast, other studies demonstrated no differences in the cardiometabolic outcomes between the two groups of preterm infants15,16; like Darendelier et al. reported that there were no differences in insulin resistance and body composition during the pre-pubertal period between preterm SGA and AGA17.
Accelerated growth is another important risk factor for metabolic syndrome in the later part of life in term SGA infants18. On the contrary, slow weight gain was found to result in adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in term SGA infants19. Likewise, the influence of postnatal growth on an increased risk of metabolic syndrome in preterm infants has been demonstrated as well20,21. In addition, unfavorable neurodevelopmental outcomes following poor growth have also been reported in this population22,23. However, the optimal intrauterine and extrauterine growth patterns related to cardiometabolic and neurocognitive outcomes have not been established in preterm infants so far.
In this study, the prevalence of adverse cardiometabolic findings at school-age was evaluated among very preterm infants born as AGA and SGA. Moreover, to investigate the role of growth velocity at different periods on health outcomes of preterm infants, the associations between postnatal growth velocity at different periods with the health status at school-age were analyzed in the study population, including cardiometabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Methods
Study design
This was a retrospective cohort study. Preterm infants born at < 32 weeks of gestation or having a birth weight of < 1,500 g and who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Seoul National University Children’s Hospital between 2008 and 2009 were enrolled in the cohort at a chronological age of 6–8 years. Among 266 infants who were born below 32 weeks’ gestation or 1,500 g at birth, families of 136 infants were contacted, and 60 of them consented to participate in the cohort. Of the 60 infants in the cohort, four with grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), according to the classification by Papile et al.24 or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) were excluded. SGA was defined as a birth weight of < 10th percentile for age by the Fenton growth chart25. The participants were assigned to two groups, SGA and AGA, based on the birth weight. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the guideline of the Human Research Protection Program.
Data collection and laboratory analyses
Data on perinatal factors, including birth weight, gestational age (GA), delivery mode, sex, and multiple births were reviewed. Data on neonatal outcomes, such as treated patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and sepsis were collected. Information on the duration of breast milk feeding and additional calorie intake other than fortifier was also reviewed. Body weight at discharge, corrected age (CA) of 4 months, chronological age at 12 and 24 months, and school-age were measured. The z-scores of body weight were calculated according to the World Health Organization growth charts.
At school-age, anthropometric parameters, including weight, waist circumference (WC), and height were assessed. The fat mass was measured using the InBody Test (BIA; InBody 770, Biospace Co., Seoul, Korea). The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared, and the fat mass index (FMI) was obtained by dividing the fat mass in kilograms by height in square meters. Lean mass index (LMI) was calculated by dividing the lean mass by the square of height. The blood pressure (BP) (systolic and diastolic) was also measured with an automated device at the left arm using an appropriate-sized cuff. The BP was measured twice, and the average value of the two readings was recorded. The BP was interpreted using the normative BP table proposed by Lee et al.26. The Korean national growth charts for children and adolescents released in 2007 were used to calculate the percentile of WC. The parents filled questionnaires related to the recent daily calorie intake and physical activity.
The blood sample of each participant was obtained by venipuncture after 8 h of fasting. The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) representing the insulin resistance was evaluated after estimating fasting plasma insulin and glucose levels. Then, the values were applied to the following equation: HOMA-IR = fasting plasma insulin (mU/mL) × fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) / 405. The lipid profiles including total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), leptin, and adiponectin were also estimated. The intellectual abilities at 6 years of age, including verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed, were tested using the Korean Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition (K-WISC-IV), administered by a trained assessor.
Statistical analyses
The data are presented as median (interquartile ranges) or count (percentage). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was conducted to compare the continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test was used for the categorical variables. Multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between the changes in the z-score at each epoch with the cardiometabolic factors at school-age. Regression coefficients beta (β) with p values were calculated after adjusting for GA, birth weight z-score, weight z-score change from birth to discharge, and sex. Multivariate linear regression analysis was also used to determine the effect of weight gain at different epochs on each index scale of K-WISC-IV after adjusting for factors that could influence neurocognitive outcomes, such as GA, birth weight z-score, weight z-score change from birth to discharge, sex, and IVH27,28,29,30. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. STATA 12.0 for Windows (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA) was used to analyze all data.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study.
Results
Subject characteristics
Among the 56 school-aged children born prematurely, 14 were born as SGA. The gestational age was higher in the SGA group than that in the AGA group (28 vs. 31.6 weeks, p < 0.001), and RDS was more prevalent in the AGA group (42.9% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.021) (Table 1). Otherwise, there were no differences in the perinatal characteristics between two groups. Although the postmenstrual age at discharge was comparable, weight at discharge was higher in the AGA group (2360 vs. 2095 g, p < 0.001).
Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, laboratory findings, including lipid profile, and insulin resistance at school-age
At school-age, weight, BMI, lean body mass, and LMI were lower in the SGA group (Table 2). However, no significant differences in BP, lipid profiles, fasting glucose, insulin level, and HOMA-IR were found between two groups. Based on the questionnaires, no significant differences in calorie intake and activity were identified between two groups (Supplementary Table S1).
Growth patterns from birth to school-age
The weight z-scores were lower in the SGA group from birth to school-age (Table 3). Although changes in the weight z-scores from 4 months CA to 12 months were significantly higher in the SGA group (-0.22 vs. 0.36, p = 0.028), there were no differences in the changes of z-scores during the other epochs. In both groups, the catch-up of weight z-score was mostly achieved during the period from discharge to 4 months CA.
Association of growth with cardiometabolic and neurocognitive outcomes at school-age
In the multivariate linear regression analysis after adjustment for GA, birth weight z-score, weight z-score change from birth to discharge, and sex, cardiometabolic outcomes were not associated with z-score changes before 12 months after birth (Table 4). Only the z-score of birth weight showed a positive correlation with diastolic BP at school-age. Waist circumference, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR were positively associated with z-score changes during 12 − 24 months and 24 − 72 months. The HDL-C level was negatively correlated with the z-score changes from 12 − 24 months, and positive correlations were also observed between z-score changes from 24 months to school-age and the systolic BP, FMI, and leptin levels.
The z-score changes in weight from birth to discharge were positively related with the full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) (β = 0.314, p = 0.036) and perceptual reasoning index (β = 0.456, p = 0.003) at school-age (Table 5). However, the z-score changes after discharge at any periods, as well as birth weight z-score, did not show any correlation with FSIQ, as well as each index of K-WISC-IV.
Discussion
In the present study, the effect of size at birth and postnatal growth at different epochs on the health status at school-age, including metabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes, were assessed in preterm infants. Among the study population, the AGA group included more premature infants and had a higher prevalence of RDS compared to the SGA group. While weight, LMI, and BMI at school-age were lower in the SGA group, there were no differences in the cardiometabolic parameters, including BP and insulin resistance, between preterm infants born as SGA and AGA. Multivariate analysis showed that cardiometabolic outcomes were associated with weight gain after 12 or 24 months, while neurocognitive outcomes were associated with weight gain before discharge from the NICU.
Term SGA is considered as an important risk factor for developing metabolic syndrome in the later part of life4,31. Increased cardiovascular risk, shown as peripheral conduit arterial stiffness and higher mean systolic BP, was observed in children born preterm and SGA32. However, the effects of SGA at birth on later health outcomes in preterm infants have not been clearly demonstrated so far. In a cohort study performed in New Zealand, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was comparable between very-low birth weight infants with or without SGA15. There were no differences in the systolic and diastolic BP of adults regardless of their birth weight among very-low birth weight infants in the aforementioned study33.
Such controversies on cardiometabolic outcomes in preterm SGA might be contributed by the growth velocity or catch-up growth of preterm SGA infants in each study, as rapid postnatal growth is known as a key component in the development of metabolic syndrome in term SGA infants18. Studies reporting SGA as a risk factor for metabolic syndrome among preterm infants also showed that preterm SGA achieved catch-up growth, reporting comparable weight or BMI with preterm AGA infants at evaluation13,14. However in the present study, although growth velocity was greater from 4 to 12 months of age in the SGA group, weight z-scores were consistently lower until school-age, accompanied by lower LMI and lower BMI at evaluation. In a term SGA study, risk of metabolic syndrome was reportedly lower in SGA infants without excessive catch-up growth during infancy, compared with those with catch-up growth19.
To clarify the role of growth velocity in the development of cardiometabolic abnormalities in the study population, multivariate analysis was conducted adjusting the birth weight z-score. The result showed that the growth velocity beyond 12 or 24 months of age was correlated with several cardiometabolic outcomes in our study. The critical period of growth for the later health outcomes in preterm infants has not yet been established. Several studies have reported the association of early postnatal growth patterns, especially until 3 months of CA, and unfavorable health outcomes in the later part of life. A Dutch national prospective follow-up study reported that early postnatal growth from birth to CA of 3 months in very preterm infants was associated with higher BMI, fat mass, and percentage of body fat at age 19 years34. A rapid catch-up during the first 3 months after term age was positively associated with higher fat percentage, waist circumference, and serum triglyceride level at 21 years of age35. As compared to these studies, the current study showed that relatively later growth after 12 months of life is related to abnormal findings of the cardiometabolic components at school-age. This is compatible with the report of Embleton et al.36, who reported the association of growth beyond 1 year of age and adverse metabolic outcomes in children who were born prematurely. Interestingly, the associations of earlier growth (< 3 months of CA) and later outcomes were found in a young adult study, while the effect of later growth (> 1 year of age) was found at a relatively young age, including the present study.
In terms of neurodevelopmental outcomes, changes in weight z-score during NICU stay had a positive correlation with full scales of K-WISC-IV, especially with the perceptional reasoning index in our study. On the other hand, there was no association between neurocognitive outcomes and z-score of birth weight or growth after discharge. Early postnatal growth of preterm infants is important for favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes. The association of in-hospital weight gain of preterm infants and improvement of mental processing composite score of the Kaufmann Assessment Battery at 5 years of age was demonstrated by Franz et al.37. According to Ehrenkranz et al., better weight growth during NICU stay reduced the incidence of cerebral palsy and poor neurocognitive outcomes at 18 − 22 months’ of CA38.
The trade-off phenomenon by postnatal growth in preterm infants has been well demonstrated in two multi-center longitudinal studies from the Infant Health and Development Project in the US. In the first study, rapid weight gain from term to age 4 months was associated with better cognitive outcomes at school-age and higher BP21. Another study reported that linear growth from term to 4 months was related to better cognitive outcomes at 8 years and 18 years of age, while the risk of becoming overweight or obese was increased at 8 years of age39. However, these previous studies did not consider the role of postnatal growth in the NICU.
In the present study, the growth during NICU stay was calculated and adjusted because postnatal growth before term equivalent age plays an important role in cardiometabolic outcomes40,41,42 and neurodevelopmental outcomes43,44. Deprivation followed by a relatively enriched environment is a pivotal hypothesis of the developmental origin of adult disease1. The postnatal period during NICU stay in preterm infants could be understood as a deprived environment because many very preterm infants experience extrauterine growth restriction during this period45,46, and it might be considered in the analysis as an effect of growth after the neonatal period on later health outcomes.
The results of the present study might provide some clues to set an optimal growth target and accordant nutritional interventions for preterm infants because many term SGA studies reported postnatal growth as a double-edged sword between health in later life and neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, if growth at different periods affects different aspects of later health outcomes, nutritional interventions could be focused at a time when these could lead to favorable outcomes47,48,49.
There are limitations to generalizing the results of the present study. This is a single-center study with a small number of children. Only 22.5% of the original birth population constituted the study cohort, and 14 out of 56 preterm infants were born as SGA. Moreover, control group was not included in the current study. Therefore, the statistical power of the present study was low. However, the growth pattern of preterm and term infants should be compared with caution because most preterm infants experience postnatal growth restriction immediately after birth and growth standards regarding later health outcomes have not been established. In this respect, the purpose of the current study was confined to the evaluation of the association between growth velocity and health outcomes among preterm population.
In the present study, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was not assessed among the study population. Although IUGR is often used interchangeably with SGA, their definitions and etiologies are different. In addition, an IUGR fetus may be born as either SGA or AGA and vice versa. IUGR is defined as a lower-than-normal fetal growth rate, considering the growth potential by fetal race and sex, whilst SGA is determined by size at birth, such as weight and height according to the sex50,51. SGA could originate from factors other than obstetric and fetal problems, such as genetic causes (small parents) and maternal weight gain during pregnancy52. However, SGA could be used as a proxy of IUGR, and many studies also reported adverse cardiometabolic outcomes in the SGA population2,4,5,19,31,32.
Although growth velocity during NICU stay was associated with favorable later neurocognitive outcomes, optimal standards for growth could not be driven from this study only. Prospective studies with larger populations are required to establish optimal growth standards for adulthood health outcomes, including both metabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Moreover, longitudinal follow-up study evaluating the components of the metabolic syndrome and actual diagnosis of the disease at older age is needed.
Conclusion
In the present study, among preterm infants, more rapid weight gain during NICU stay was associated with better neurocognitive outcomes. On the contrary, better weight gain beyond 12 months or 24 months of age was related to adverse cardiometabolic outcomes at school-age. As growth at different periods affects different outcomes in the later part of life, nutritional interventions and monitoring of growth might be established based on the age of the preterm infants.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Barker, D. J. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease. BMJ 301, 1111–1111 (1990).
Szałapska, M. et al. Metabolic syndrome components among children born small for gestational age: Analysis of the first decade of life. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 16, 270–276 (2010).
Hofman, P. L. et al. Insulin resistance in short children with intrauterine growth retardation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.82.2.3752 (1997).
Crume, T. L. et al. The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: The EPOCH study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22, 608–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20565 (2014).
Martínez-Aguayo, A. et al. Comparison of leptin levels, body composition and insulin sensitivity and secretion by OGTT in healthy, early pubertal girls born at either appropriate- or small-for-gestational age. Clin. Endocrinol. 67, 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02919.x (2007).
Morrison, K. M. et al. Cardiometabolic health in adults born premature with extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0515 (2016).
Markopoulou, P., Papanikolaou, E., Analytis, A., Zoumakis, E. & Siahanidou, T. Preterm birth as a risk factor for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease in adult life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pediatr. 210, 69-80.e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.041 (2019).
Edstedt Bonamy, A.-K. et al. Blood pressure in 6-year-old children born extremely preterm. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 6, e005858. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005858 (2017).
Vohr, B. R. et al. High blood pressure at early school age among extreme preterms. Pediatrics 142 (2018).
Kistner, A. et al. Differences in insulin resistance markers between children born small for gestational age or born preterm appropriate for gestational age. Acta Paediatr. 101, 1217–1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12005 (2012).
Posod, A. et al. Former very preterm infants show an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile at a preschool age. PLoS ONE 11, e0168162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168162 (2016).
Huang, Y.-T., Lin, H.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Su, B.-H. & Lin, C.-C. Association of preterm birth and small for gestational age with metabolic outcomes in children and adolescents: A population-based cohort study from Taiwan. Pediatr. Neonatol. 59, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.07.007 (2018).
Bazaes, R. A. et al. Determinants of insulin sensitivity and secretion in very-low-birth-weight children. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-031239 (2004).
Juonala, M. et al. Effect of birth weight on life-course blood pressure levels among children born premature: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. J. Hypertens. 33, 1542–1548. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000000612 (2015).
Darlow, B. A., Martin, J. & Horwood, L. J. Metabolic syndrome in very low birth weight young adults and controls: The New Zealand 1986 VLBW study. J. Pediatr. 206, 128-133.e125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.10.060 (2019).
Hovi, P. et al. Blood pressure in young adults born at very low birth weight: Adults born preterm international collaboration. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. -:- 1979) 68, 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.08167 (2016).
Darendeliler, F. et al. Insulin resistance and body composition in preterm born children during prepubertal ages. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 68, 773–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03119.x (2008).
Fabricius-Bjerre, S. et al. Impact of birth weight and early infant weight gain on insulin resistance and associated cardiovascular risk factors in adolescence. PLoS ONE 6, e20595–e20595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020595 (2011).
Lei, X. et al. The optimal postnatal growth trajectory for term small for gestational age babies: A prospective cohort study. J. Pediatr. 166, 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.025 (2015).
Fewtrell, M. S. et al. Effects of size at birth, gestational age and early growth in preterm infants on glucose and insulin concentrations at 9–12 years. Diabetologia 43, 714–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250051368 (2000).
Belfort, M. B., Martin, C. R., Smith, V. C., Gillman, M. W. & McCormick, M. C. Infant weight gain and school-age blood pressure and cognition in former preterm infants. Pediatrics 125, e1419–e1426 (2010).
Tudehope, D. I., Burns, Y., O’Callaghan, M., Mohay, H. & Silcock, A. The relationship between intrauterine and postnatal growth on the subsequent psychomotor development of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Aust. Paediatr. J. 19, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1983.tb02041.x (1983).
Sices, L., Wilson-Costello, D., Minich, N., Friedman, H. & Hack, M. Postdischarge growth failure among extremely low birth weight infants: Correlates and consequences. Paediatr. Child Health 12, 22–28 (2007).
Papile, L. A., Burstein, J., Burstein, R. & Koffler, H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: A study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J. Pediatr. 92, 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0 (1978).
Fenton, T. R. & Kim, J. H. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 13, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-13-59 (2013).
Lee, C. G. et al. Normative blood pressure references for Korean children and adolescents. Korean J. Pediatr. 51, 33–41 (2008).
Bolisetty, S. et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage and neurodevelopmental outcomes in extreme preterm infants. Pediatrics 133, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0372 (2014).
Hintz, S. R., Kendrick, D. E., Vohr, B. R., Kenneth Poole, W. & Higgins, R. D. Gender differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm, extremely-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway-:- 1992) 95, 1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/08035250600599727 (2006).
Pierrat, V. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BMJ 358 (2017).
Jelliffe-Pawlowski, L. L. & Hansen, R. L. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 8 months and 4 years among infants born full-term small-for-gestational-age. J. Perinatol. 24, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211111 (2004).
de Jong, M., Cranendonk, A. & van Weissenbruch, M. M. Components of the metabolic syndrome in early childhood in very-low-birth-weight infants and term small and appropriate for gestational age infants. Pediatr. Res. 78, 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.118 (2015).
Cheung, Y. F., Wong, K. Y., Lam, B. C. C. & Tsoi, N. S. Relation of arterial stiffness with gestational age and birth weight. Arch. Dis. Child. 89, 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.025999 (2004).
Hovi, P. et al. Blood pressure in young adults born at very low birth weight: Adults born preterm international collaboration. Hypertension 68, 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1161/Hypertensionaha.116.08167 (2016).
Euser, A. M. et al. Associations between prenatal and infancy weight gain and BMI, fat mass, and fat distribution in young adulthood: a prospective cohort study in males and females born very preterm. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn.81.2.480 (2005).
Kerkhof, G. F., Leunissen, R. W. J. & Hokken-Koelega, A. C. S. Early origins of the metabolic syndrome: Role of small size at birth, early postnatal weight gain, and adult IGF-I. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 2637–2643. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1426%JTheJournalofClinicalEndocrinology&Metabolism (2012).
Embleton, N. D. et al. Catch-up growth and metabolic outcomes in adolescents born preterm. Arch. Dis. Child. 101, 1026–1031 (2016).
Franz, A. R. et al. Intrauterine, early neonatal, and postdischarge growth and neurodevelopmental outcome at 5.4 years in extremely preterm infants after intensive neonatal nutritional support. Pediatrics 123, e101–e109 (2009).
Ehrenkranz, R. A. et al. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 117, 1253–1261 (2006).
Belfort, M. B., Gillman, M. W., Buka, S. L., Casey, P. H. & McCormick, M. C. Preterm infant linear growth and adiposity gain: Trade-offs for later weight status and intelligence quotient. J. Pediatr. 163, 1564-1569.e1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.032 (2013).
Kerkhof, G. F., Willemsen, R. H., Leunissen, R. W., Breukhoven, P. E. & Hokken-Koelega, A. C. Health profile of young adults born preterm: negative effects of rapid weight gain in early life. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 4498–4506. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1716 (2012).
Singhal, A., Fewtrell, M., Cole, T. J. & Lucas, A. Low nutrient intake and early growth for later insulin resistance in adolescents born preterm. Lancet (London, England) 361, 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12895-4 (2003).
Toftlund, L. H., Halken, S., Agertoft, L. & Zachariassen, G. Early nutrition and signs of metabolic syndrome at 6 y of age in children born very preterm. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 107, 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy015 (2018).
Cordova, E. G. et al. Association of poor postnatal growth with neurodevelopmental impairment in infancy and childhood: Comparing the fetus and the healthy preterm infant references. J. Pediatr 225, 37-43.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.05.063 (2020).
Belfort, M. B. et al. Infant growth before and after term: Effects on neurodevelopment in preterm infants. Pediatrics 128, e899–e906 (2011).
Kavurt, S. & Celik, K. Incidence and risk factors of postnatal growth restriction in preterm infants. J. Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 31, 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1306512 (2018).
Shah, P. S. et al. Postnatal growth failure in preterm infants: ascertainment and relation to long-term outcome. J. Perinat. Med. 34, 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2006.094 (2006).
Lapillonne, A. & Griffin, I. J. Feeding preterm infants today for later metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes. J. Pediatr. 162, S7–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.048 (2013).
Stephens, B. E. et al. First-week protein and energy intakes are associated with 18-month developmental outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 123, 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0211 (2009).
Visuthranukul, C., Abrams, S. A., Hawthorne, K. M., Hagan, J. L. & Hair, A. B. Premature small for gestational age infants fed an exclusive human milk-based diet achieve catch-up growth without metabolic consequences at 2 years of age. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 104, F242–F247. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314547 (2019).
Sharma, D., Shastri, S. & Sharma, P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin. Med. Insights Pediatr. 10, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.4137/CMPed.S40070 (2016).
McCowan, L. & Horgan, R. P. Risk factors for small for gestational age infants. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 23, 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.06.003 (2009).
Melby, M. K., Yamada, G. & Surkan, P. J. Inadequate gestational weight gain increases risk of small-for-gestational-age term birth in girls in Japan: A population-based cohort study. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 28, 714–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22855 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI14C3451).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.J.K. and S.H.S. participated in the conception and design of the study. The statistical analysis and data collection were done by Y.J.K. and S.H.S. Y.J.K. drafted the manuscript. E.S.L., Y.H.J., Y.A.L., CHS, EKK, and HSK conducted the revision and critical review of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, Y.J., Shin, S.H., Lee, E.S. et al. Impact of size at birth and postnatal growth on metabolic and neurocognitive outcomes in prematurely born school-age children. Sci Rep 11, 6836 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86292-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86292-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Longstanding Auditory Sensory and Semantic Differences in Preterm Born Children
Brain Topography (2024)