Abstract
The kinase haspin phosphorylates histone H3 at threonine-3 (H3T3ph) during mitosis. H3T3ph provides a docking site for the Chromosomal Passenger Complex at the centromere, enabling correction of erratic microtubule-chromosome contacts. Although this mechanism is operational in all dividing cells, haspin-null mice do not exhibit developmental anomalies, apart from aberrant testis architecture. Investigating this problem, we show here that mouse embryonic stem cells that lack or overexpress haspin, albeit prone to chromosome misalignment during metaphase, can still divide, expand and differentiate. RNA sequencing reveals that haspin dosage affects severely the expression levels of several genes that are involved in male gametogenesis. Consistent with a role in testis-specific expression, H3T3ph is detected not only in mitotic spermatogonia and meiotic spermatocytes, but also in non-dividing cells, such as haploid spermatids. Similarly to somatic cells, the mark is erased in the end of meiotic divisions, but re-installed during spermatid maturation, subsequent to methylation of histone H3 at lysine-4 (H3K4me3) and arginine-8 (H3R8me2). These serial modifications are particularly enriched in chromatin domains containing histone H3 trimethylated at lysine-27 (H3K27me3), but devoid of histone H3 trimethylated at lysine-9 (H3K9me3). The unique spatio-temporal pattern of histone H3 modifications implicates haspin in the epigenetic control of spermiogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Haspin was originally identified in mouse spermatids1. Subsequent studies revealed its presence in somatic cells, albeit at much lower levels2,3. The carboxy-terminal region of this protein shows homology to a variety of eukaryotic protein kinases2,4, possesses a bilobar fold and can constitutively phosphorylate protein substrates5,6,7,8. Due to the lack of characteristic motifs present in other protein kinases, haspin is classified as an atypical serine-threonine kinase. The single haspin gene, Gsg2, is also atypical: it lacks introns and lies entirely within an intron of the Integrin alphaE gene4,9. Orthologs of Gsg2 exist in many eukaryotic species, from humans to budding yeast5.
Three bibliographical milestones have shaped the current understanding with regards to the function of haspin. In 2004, we have described the reversible phosphorylation of threonine-3 in histone H3 (H3T3ph), a post-translational modification that occurs specifically during mitosis in somatic cells. H3T3ph was localized in the centromeric region of metaphase chromosomes, suggesting a role in chromosome congression10. In 2005, Higgins and co-workers showed that the H3T3ph mark is established by haspin11. Finally, in 2010 and 2011, several laboratories showed independently that H3T3ph provides a binding site for survivin, a component of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC)12,13,14,15. Apart from survivin, CPC also contains INCENP, borealin and the mitotic kinase Aurora B16.
Consistent with a role in CPC recruitment, treatment of somatic cells with haspin-specific inhibitors or knockdown with RNAi causes mobilization of Aurora B from the centromere and partial dispersion to the chromosome arms11,17,18,19,20. Dissociation from the inner centromere compromises chromosome congression, because Aurora B is required for de-stabilization of inappropriate chromosome-microtubule contacts and activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)21. Apart from chromosome congression, haspin has also been implicated in sister-chromatid cohesion22,23 and spindle pole assembly24.
On a system’s level, two questions about haspin are still pending. First, given its role in mitosis, why haspin shows its highest expression in haploid spermatids, a non-dividing lineage1? Second, since multiple cycles of mitotic division are required for expansion of embryonic cell populations during development, how do we explain that haspin-null embryos develop normally and do not exhibit anatomical defects, apart from testicular anomalies25?
Urged by these questions, we set to examine whether haspin has multiple roles or is primarily involved in a tissue-specific function. Using the experimental platform of mouse embryonic stem cells and exploiting the unique spatio-temporal pattern of gametocyte differentiation in the seminiferous tubules of the testis, we have reached the conclusion that haspin is dispensable for completion of mitosis, but likely participates in the transcriptional regulation of spermiogenesis.
Results
Haspin dosage affects the levels and the spread of H3T3ph across chromosomes
To find out whether haspin has an essential role in self-renewal divisions, we disrupted the Gsg2 gene using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing (Fig. 1a, histogram and Supplemental Figure S1; see also 20). In parallel, we generated stable E14 cell lines overexpressing haspin-eGFP (Fig. 1b, histogram). Haspin-knockout (KO) and haspin-overexpressing (OE) cells were examined exhaustively to pinpoint potential mitotic defects.
Analysis of total lysates of KO cells by western blotting revealed the absence of H3T3ph (Fig. 1c, WB, lane KO). Furthermore, no trace of H3T3ph could be detected when these cells were surveyed by confocal microscopy (Fig. 1a, images). Despite the absence of H3T3ph, mitotic chromosomes possessed compact centromeres (as documented by ACA staining), had the usual density and were organized as a normal-looking metaphase plate. The typical, centromeric pattern of H3T3ph in wild type E14 cells remained unchanged after treatment with a specific inhibitor of the Per-Arnt-Sim kinase (PASK), which has been reported to phosphorylate histone H3 at multiple threonine residues in C2C12 and HEK293T cells (Supplemental Figure S2; for relevant literature see Karakkat et al.26). Taken together, these results indicate that haspin is solely responsible for H3T3ph and that the lack of this mark does not affect the microscopic appearance and spatial organization of mitotic chromosomes.
Haspin-eGFP, which was produced at high levels in stable OE cell lines, accumulated primarily in the centromeric regions of metaphase chromosomes (Fig. 1b, images). A similar localization pattern was observed in KO cells and wild type E14 cells expressing low or high levels of haspin after transient transfection (Fig. 1d, Phenotypes). Thus, the accumulation of haspin at the centromeres did not seem to depend on expression levels and did not require an initial “seed” of H3T3ph at the centromere.
As expected, the increased dosage of haspin in OE cells resulted in a significant increase of the H3T3ph levels (Fig. 1c, WB, lane OE). However, while haspin-eGFP accumulated at the centromeres, (the excess) H3T3ph spread to the chromosome arms (Fig. 1b,d, images). The presence of H3T3ph across the entire chromosome is easily explained by the increase of haspin kinase activity, which most likely upsets the normal kinase-phosphatase balance. Consistent with this interpretation, a pan-chromosomal distribution of H3T3ph has been observed previously in human U2OS cells deficient in Repo-Man, the regulatory subunit of PP1γ, which counteracts haspin-mediated phosphorylation27. The same pattern has been seen in early human zygotes, where the levels of PP1γ are naturally low28.
The spread of H3T3ph along the chromosomes likely affects chromatin organization and chromatid packing. A strong indication for this was that histone H3 trimethylation at lysine-9 (H3K9me3), a histone mark normally restricted to the pericentromeric area of the mitotic chromosomes, was clearly delocalized in OE cells (Fig. 1e). Furthermore, the sister-chromatids of these cells sometimes appeared “inflated” or partially dissociated from each other (Supplemental Figure S3).
Aurora B can be recruited to the centromere by a haspin-independent mechanism
As anticipated from previous studies, in the absence of haspin, the kinase Aurora B was partially de-localized from the centromere (Fig. 2a, upper panel). However, in most of the KO cells, the Aurora B signal appeared weak, as has been previously noted by Baron et al.29. A decrease in the steady state levels of Aurora B could be ruled out by western blotting (Fig. 1c, WB, lane KO). Down-regulation of the Aurora B gene could also be excluded by RNA sequencing data presented in a following section. However, the seemingly weak Aurora B signal could be explained by a change in aggregation state.
Closer inspection of KO cells revealed that the large, Aurora B-containing clusters, which were always observed in the centromeric regions of control cells, were replaced by a constellation of small granules. These “fragments” were retained in the pericentromeric zone (Fig. 2a, upper panel, blowups; for more details see Supplemental Figure S4), suggesting H3T3ph-independent binding to the proximal centromere/kinetochore14,30,31. Corroborating the idea of dual (i.e., H3T3ph-dependent and H3T3ph-independent) binding of CPC to the centromere, Aurora B was predominantly localized at the centromeric region in OE cells (Fig. 2b, lower panel), despite the fact that H3T3ph was spread across the chromosome arms. Finally, supporting a dual mode of CPC/Aurora B-centromere interactions, combined inhibition of the haspin kinase (by 5-ITu) and the Bub1 kinase (by BAY-320) in Hela cells had a more pronounced effect on the targeting of CPC components to the centromere than inhibition of each kinase alone (Supplemental Figure S5a,b; see also Ref.29). This experiment could not be performed using E14 cells, because the murine Bub1 kinase was not sensitive to BAY-320; see Supplemental Figure S5c. It is unclear why Aurora B organizes in large centromeric clusters when the haspin-dependent and the haspin-independent mechanisms are both operative, but shows a dispersed distribution when the former mechanism is dismantled.
Haspin imbalance causes mitotic defects, but does not abort self-renewal divisions
KO and OE cells exhibited mitotic spindle anomalies. In both cases, the inter-pole distance during metaphase was consistently shorter than in the corresponding controls (Fig. 2c), suggesting that correct spindle geometry requires exact haspin dosage. Consistent with the partial de-localization of Aurora B and the altered geometry of the spindle, the incidence of misaligned chromosomes in these cells was increased about two-fold (Fig. 2c, histograms).
Despite the mitotic defects detected in KO and OE cells, the relative proportions of prophase, metaphase, anaphase and telophase figures in the cell population were similar to those of the controls (Supplemental Figure S6a). However, as could be confirmed by video microscopy a proportion of the cells exited mitosis with delayed kinetics (Supplemental Figure S6b,c). No other differences in cell cycle could be detected in the bulk sample by flow cytometry (Fig. 2d, histograms). KO cells (and to a lesser extent OE cells) showed a decrease in growth rate, but the expansion of the self-renewing population was not affected severely (Fig. 2d, growth curves). Taken together, these data show that haspin plays a variety of roles during mitosis, but is clearly not essential for completion of mitosis and population expansion of embryonic stem cells. This interpretation is also justified by the fact that KO and OE cells could be passaged multiple times during selection of the corresponding clones, without a visible change in colony-forming ability.
Haspin dosage affects heterochromatin organization, but does not compromise the pluripotent state
Recent work has shown that haspin deficiency leads to formation of smaller-than-normal nuclei in D. melanogaster32. As shown in Supplemental Figure S7, some small (but statistically significant) differences in nuclear size could also be detected in mouse cells that expressed inappropriate amounts of haspin. In this case, the nuclei of KO cells were larger than those of the corresponding controls, while the nuclei of the OE cells were smaller. Although the distribution of heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α) and histone H3 trimethylated at lysine-9 or lysine-27 (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, respectively) did not change, KO and OE cells possessed on the average more heterochromatic foci than the corresponding controls, while the size of the foci in the former was slightly smaller. We interpret these slight (but distinct) differences as indications of altered chromatin organization.
No major effects on the expression of key pluripotency factors, such as Nanog, Oct4 and Klf4, were detected when KO and OE cells were compared to wild type cells by indirect immunofluorescence (Supplemental Figure S8a). Moreover, quantitative assessment of the corresponding mRNAs by qRT-PCR did not reveal consistent differences between KO cells and the corresponding controls (Supplemental Figure S8b, KO). A statistically significant increase in the levels of Nanog, Oct4 and Klf4 mRNA was detected in one of the two OE clones (Supplemental Figure S8b, OE), but since this effect was clearly clone-specific it was not pursued further.
Haspin is not essential for stem cell differentiation
Upon removal of LIF and suspension in “hanging drops”, KO and OE cells produced embryoid bodies (EBs). The EBs formed by the former were generally smaller than those formed by the latter and the corresponding controls (Fig. 3a, KO). Furthermore, whereas EBs derived from OE cells grew normally the first 6 days in culture, those formed by KO cells failed to thrive (Fig. 3a, OE). This failure to thrive is consistent with the fact that KO cells show a relatively slower growth rate than OE and control cells (consult Fig. 2d).
To examine the developmental potential of KO and OE cells by a different method, we induced the formation of teratomas in immunodeficient mice. As shown in Fig. 3b, the tumors derived from KO cells appeared smaller than those derived from the corresponding controls. However, this difference in size was not statistically significant. On the other hand, teratomas formed by OE cells were significantly larger than those formed by control cells, suggesting a difference in growth potential. Histological analysis of the teratomas revealed the existence of tissues derived from all three germ layers (Fig. 3c), in full agreement with the fact that KO mice develop to term and are born alive25. These observations establish the fact that haspin is not essential for stem cell differentiation. However, the data do not rule out the possibility that this kinase is involved in some specialized, tissue-specific function.
Haspin dosage affects gene expression
To determine whether the lack or the excess of haspin influences differentiation along a specific lineage, we analyzed the expression patterns of KO and OE cells by RNA sequencing. As shown in Fig. 4a, a large number of genes were deregulated upon haspin knockout or overexpression. Filtering out those that were affected in only one of the two KO or OE clones, adopting a p-value < 0.05 and concentrating our attention on expression differences ≥ 2-fold over the control, we found that in both cases the downregulated genes outnumbered the upregulated ones. Thus, both the lack and the excess of haspin appeared to have a net repressive effect on gene transcription.
Genes affected by haspin knockout or overexpression could be identified in several mouse chromosomes. According to the Fisher exact test, the distribution of deregulated genes in OE cells exhibited a strong statistical correlation with chromosomes 1, 2, 12, 14, X and Y (Fig. 4b). KO cells yielded a more distinct cytogenetic signature, since the affected genes correlated only with the X and Y chromosomes. Consistent with preferential association with the sex chromosomes, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis indicated that many of the affected genes encoded factors involved in reproductive processes and in particular male gametogenesis (Fig. 4c; consult also Fig. 4a).
To better interpret the genomic data, we focused on a subset of genes, whose expression was significantly changed in both KO and OE cells. This category included 40 genes (Fig. 4d). Of these, 33 were downregulated and 6 upregulated in both cases, whereas 1 was differentially expressed in the two groups. The set of downregulated genes included Scml2 and Dazl. Scml2 (Sex comb οn midleg-like 2) resides in the X chromosome and encodes a Polycomb-associated protein responsible for establishing the male epigenome through histone H2A ubiquitination33,34,35. Dazl (Deleted in azoospermia-like) is located at chromosome 17 and encodes an RNA-binding protein that interacts with other RNA-binding proteins to regulate mRNA translation in spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes36,37. The downregulation of these two genes was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4e).
Downregulated genes also included Zfy1/2, two genes located in the Y chromosome and involved in spermatogenesis38,39,40,41,42,43; Uba1y, a gene also localized in the Y chromosome and involved in the survival and proliferation of differentiating spermatogonia44,45,46; Sohlh2, an essential germ cell-specific gene47,48,49,50; Nxf3, a gene localized in the X chromosome and specifically expressed in Sertoli cells51,52; Fkbp6, a meiosis-specific gene53; and the upstream regulator of the EIF2S3Y gene, which, together with SRY, orchestrates the male gametogenesis program54,55,56. Finally, among the genes that were downregulated in OE cells were Zfp264 and Usp26. The former gene lies in a reciprocal imprinting domain and is highly expressed in testis57; the latter (which was also downregulated in one of the two KO clones) encodes a protein whose mutation results in deficiencies in fertility and spermatogenesis, depending genetic background (Sakai et al.58).
Using the STRING algorithm and the database of protein–protein interactions59, we found that certain haspin targets are parts of a gene network. As shown diagrammatically in Supplemental Figure S9, central in this network are some of the most downregulated genes in the KO clones (> 6-fold difference; see Fig. 4a), e.g., KDM5D (JARID1D) and Uty, which encode Nε-methyl lysine demethylases. KDM5D demethylates H3K4me2,3, whereas UTY is similar to UTX and JMJD3, two well-known H3K27me3 demethylases60,61.
H3T3ph occurs in pre-meiotic, meiotic and post-meiotic gametocytes
Prompted by the RNA sequencing data, we focused our attention on male gametogenesis. As shown schematically in Fig. 5a, the male gametogenesis program in the mouse involves a sequence of mitotic and meiotic divisions, via which the undifferentiated, diploid spermatogonia are converted to haploid spermatids and, eventually, to mature spermatozoa62,63,64. A typical histological profile of the seminiferous tubule in the mouse testis is shown in Fig. 5b.
Using RT-qPCR, we found that haspin transcripts are far more abundant in testes than in other organs (Fig. 5c). This agrees fully with the pioneering work of Tanaka et al.1, who showed that haspin is particularly enriched in haploid spermatids, and is in line with more recent transcriptome data, which show that expression of the Gsg2 gene is highly increased at the onset of spermiogenesis65, exactly when the expression of several spermatonesis-specific genes declines (see Supplementary Figure S10).
We reasoned that, if haspin is involved in transcriptional regulation during spermiogenesis, it might exert its regulatory role through H3T3ph. To examine the occurrence of H3T3ph in testis, we used two anti-peptide antibodies, aH3T3ph and aPMM, which recognize either H3T3ph or the combinatorial modification signature H3T3phK4me3R8me2 (PMM). These antibodies have been thoroughly characterized in previous studies8,10. For confirmatory work, we also used aM4M8, an antibody raised against the non-phosphorylated, doubly methylated peptide H3T3K4me3R8me28. As shown in Fig. 5d, the three antibodies recognized modified histone H3 in total (acid) extracts of mouse testis and clarified supernatants containing soluble histones.
The immunoreactive material detected in western blotting experiments was generally less abundant in testes removed from sexually immature mice (17dpp) than in testes obtained from sexually mature animals. However, the most pronounced difference was seen when we used the aH3T3ph antibody (Fig. 5d). Consistent with these data, in frozen sections from 7-day old mouse testis, aH3T3ph stained a rare sub-population of cells residing in the periphery of the seminiferous tubule and corresponding to mitotic spermatogonia (Fig. 6a). In agreement to that and in line with previous studies, aH3T3ph stained exclusively mitotic cells in somatic tissues (e.g., kidney). However, after attainment of sexual maturity, aH3T3ph decorated a variety of cell types, including meiotic spermatocytes (Fig. 6b and Supplemental Figure S11a). A distinct aH3T3ph signal could also be discerned in round spermatids of stage VIII tubules after spermiation (i.e., release of maturing spermatids from Sertoli cells). This signal became increasingly stronger in late round and elongating spermatids, which were abundantly present in stage VIII–X tubules. However, immature spermatids in stage V–VIII tubules were stained weakly or not stained at all (Fig. 6c).
To prove beyond doubt that the antigen recognized in haploid spermatids was indeed H3T3ph, we repeated the immunofluorescence experiments mixing aH3T3ph with either the unmodified peptide H3T3K4R8 or the immunogenic peptide H3T3phK4R8 that was used to raise the aH3T3ph antibody. As shown in Fig. 6d, the signal of H3T3ph was not suppressed by the unmodified peptide, but was virtually abolished by the immunogenic peptide. These data substantiate the existence of H3T3ph in haploid spermatids and further show that this mark correlates with spermatid maturation.
Looking more closely into the sub-nuclear distribution of H3T3ph, we noticed that the mark was excluded from the chromocenter, a dense area of the nucleus that contains constitutive heterochromatin (Fig. 6c, arrowhead). This structure was heavily stained by anti-HP1α antibodies in stage V–VIII tubules, where H3T3ph was scarce, but not in stage VIII–X tubules, which stained heavily with H3T3ph (Fig. 6e). Interestingly, a pattern similar to that of H3T3ph was observed with aH3S10ph, an antibody recognizing histone H3 phosphorylated at serine-10 (see Fig. 6f). The presence of H3S10ph in haploid spermatids was as unexpected as the presence of H3T3ph, because this modification also occurs predominantly during cell division66.
Spermatid chromatin is marked sequentially with H3K4me3/H3R8me2 and H3T3ph
aPMM, the antibody that recognizes the combinatorial modification of histone H3, decorated exclusively mitotic figures in 7-day old mouse testis (Fig. 7a), but stained early round spermatids in stage V–VIII tubules in the adult testis (Fig. 7b, left panel). Since early round spermatids stained very weakly or not at all with aH3T3ph (see Fig. 6c, left and middle panels), we suspected that the antigen recognized in these cells by aPMM was a part of the PMM signature, i.e., H3T3K4me3R8me2. This interpretation was further supported by two lines of evidence: first, aPMM was previously found to bind the H3T3K4me3R8me2 peptide in ELISA assays, albeit less avidly than H3T3phK4me3R8me28; second, early round spermatids in stage V–VIII tubules stained with aM4M8, the anti-peptide antibody raised against the non-phosphorylated, doubly methylated peptide H3T3K4me3R8me2 (see Fig. 7b).
To prove the point, we performed competition experiments with histone H3 peptides and quantified the results. As shown in Fig. 7c, aPMM staining was affected slightly by the unmodified peptide H3T3K4R8 (20% decrease in average signal intensity), but was virtually abolished by either H3T3phK4me3R8me2 or H3T3K4me3R8me2 (> 90% decrease). Much lower inhibition was observed with the singly modified peptides H3T3K4R8me2 and H3T3K4me3R8 (< 20% decrease), suggesting predominance of the dual methylation mark.
Consistent with the co-existence of the double methylation mark in the same H3 molecule, a mixture of H3T3K4me3R8 and the H3T3phK4R8me2 peptides inhibited aPMM staining to a small extent (30% decrease) by comparison to the inhibition seen with the H3T3K4me3R8me2 peptide (> 90% decrease). However, when we used the peptide mixture, the variation in the signal intensity of aPMM across the specimen was more pronounced than that observed with the single peptide (see scatterplot in Fig. 7c), which indicates the existence of heterogeneity at the single-cell level.
In stage VIII–X tubules, aPMM stained late round and elongating spermatids (Fig. 7b). Confirming fully our working hypothesis, a modest inhibition was observed in this case with the non-phosphorylated, doubly methylated peptide H3T3K4me3R8me2 (30% decrease in average signal intensity), but aPMM staining was abolished by H3T3phK4me3R8me2 and H3T3phK4me3R8 (> 90% decrease). The H3T3phK4R8, H3T3phK4R8me2 and H3T3K4R8me2 peptides inhibited aPMM staining to a lesser extent (~ 30% decrease), while the H3T3K4me3R8 peptide had a negligible effect (5% decrease at this stage).
Competition assays with a mixture of H3T3phK4R8 and the H3T3K4me3R8me2 peptides showed that aPMM staining was in this case significantly inhibited (88% decrease). Again, the scattering of the data points was much more pronounced than in the case where we used the single H3T3phK4me3R8me2 peptide (see scatterplot in Fig. 7d). Collectively, these results indicated that, although haploid spermatids contain all permutations of the combinatorial signature PMM, they become increasingly richer in H3T3ph and less rich in other modifications upon progression of differentiation.
The co-existence of phosphorylation and methylation marks in cis was also investigated using biochemical methods. In these experiments, we combined immunoprecipitation (IP) and western blotting (WB) to examine the modification status of histone H3 extracted from mouse testes by HCl. As shown in Fig. 8a, aH3T3ph reacted strongly with the material precipitated by aPMM and very weakly with the histone H3 fraction precipitated by aM4M8. On the other hand, aPMM reacted strongly with the material precipitated by aM4M8 and weakly with histone H3 precipitated by aH3T3ph. Finally, aM4M8 reacted strongly with the H3 fraction precipitated by aPMM and weakly with the material precipitated by aH3T3ph. Although quantitative conclusions could not be drawn from these assays (because the three antibodies reacted to a different degree with the total H3 complement; see Fig. 5b), it would be safe to conclude that the histone sample contained H3T3ph and to a lesser extent H3T3phK4me3 (detected by aH3T3ph), as well as H3TphK4me3R8me2 and H3K4me3R8me2 (detected by aPMM), as expected from the peptide-inhibition data shown in Fig. 7c,d.
Combining these observations, we exploited the unique spatio-temporal pattern of differentiation across and along the seminiferous tubule and proceeded in the definitive experiment: to investigate the sequence of events leading to histone H3 modifications as a function of differentiation. For this task, we examined in detail testicular sections from 22 day-old mice, which had not yet completed the first cycle of spermatogenesis. As shown in Fig. 8b, during meiosis I and II both aH3T3ph and aPMM stained the chromosomes, in perfect agreement to previous observations in dividing somatic (Hela) cells8. Staining was also observed throughout with the aM4M8 antibody. Early forms of round spermatids were not stained by any of the three antibodies. However, in the transition from one stage of early round spermatids to the next, the aM4M8 and the aPMM antibodies yielded intense staining. The process was completed in late round spermatids, which became positive for H3T3ph. These spermatid forms were identified in 28 day-old mice (Fig. 8c). The data described above provide compelling evidence for sequential modification of histone H3 during spermiogenesis. A summary view of the appearance and disappearance of the H3T3ph and the PMM marks during the seminiferous cycle of adult mice is provided in Supplemental Figure S12.
The PMM mark occurs simultaneously with H3K27me3 in cells expressing SCML2 and DAZL
In sections of adult testis, aPMM decorated mitotic and meiotic figures, which were also positive with antibodies to H3S10ph (Fig. 8d). Antibodies to SCML2, an epigenetic factor affected in KO and OE cells (see Fig. 4), stained the sex body of pachytene spermatocytes in stage V–VIII tubules (Fig. 8e, left panel), as has been previously reported by Hasegawa and co-workers33. However, staining of moderately condensed chromatin was also detected in late round and elongating spermatids in stage VIII–X tubules (Fig. 8e, right panel). This pattern was observed only when fixation of the samples was sufficient (4% formaldehyde). Thus, the SCML2 protein should be either less abundant or more labile during spermiogenesis than during spermatogenesis, in agreement with other data, showing that SCML2 acts prior to switching from the spermatogenesis to the spermiogenesis program during differentiation of the male germline33. Antibodies to DAZL, another regulatory factor affected in KO and OE cells (see Fig. 4), showed heavy cytoplasmic staining in immature spermatogonia during the first wave of spermatogenesis (Supplemental Figure S11b). However, in the adult testis, the antibodies stained the nuclei of late round and elongating spermatids, which were also decorated by aH3T3ph.
Double staining with aPMM and antibodies to H3 trimethylated at lysine-9 (H3K9me3) revealed reciprocal staining of the nucleus in stage V–VIII and VIII–X tubules, with H3K9me3 localizing at the chromocenter and PMM distributing in areas of moderately compacted chromatin (Fig. 8f, top panel). PMM-marked chromatin was also decorated with antibodies to H3 trimethylated at lysine-27 (H3K27me3; see Fig. 8f, middle panel), but whether the two signals exactly co-localize could not be assessed with certainty using the available antibodies (both were raised in rabbits). Finally, double staining with aPMM and antibodies to H3 acetylated at lysine-9 (H3K9ac) indicated that the two marks coincide in stage V–VIII and VIII–X tubules (Fig. 8f, bottom panel). These data indicate that the PMM signature is present in regions of moderately compacted chromatin and excluded from areas of constitutive heterochromatin.
Discussion
We have shown here that haspin, although important for mitotic fidelity, is not essential for self-renewal divisions and differentiation of embryonic stem cells. The lack of haspin is probably compensated during mitosis by Bub1 kinase, which phosphorylates histone H2A at threonine-120 (H2AT120ph), creating a binding site for shugoshin (Sgo). Sgo associates with borealin, thus anchoring CPC at the proximal centromere/kinetochore region14,30,67,68,69.
In addition to its function in mitosis, haspin appears to be involved in the transcriptional control of male gametogenesis, thus serving two mechanistically unrelated functions in dividing and in non-dividing cells of the testis, behaving in essence as a “moonlighting protein”70. Since male gametogenesis involves both mitotic/meiotic divisions and switching from the soma-specific to the testis specific gene expression program, the role of haspin in this process seems to be important under physiological conditions, even if other factors could partially compensate for the lack of it. That might justify the fact that this protein is (naturally) much more abundant in testis than in other tissues (Tanaka et al.4 and data presented here).
The simplest method to explain the involvement of haspin in transcriptional regulation is to assume that H3T3ph is part of a histone modification (sub) code. That both the absence and the excess of haspin result in downregulation of several male germline genes cannot be explained by invoking a simple, binary phospho-methyl switch (e.g., H3T3ph-K4me3). If this were the case, genes downregulated in haspin OE cells should have been upregulated in KO cells. However, our findings can be readily explained by a mechanism that involves a compound phospho-methyl switch (e.g., H3T3ph-K4me3-R8me2), acting alone or in combination with bivalent histone modifications35,71 (e.g., H3K4me3-K27me3), which do not involve H3T3ph. This is graphically shown in the provisional model of Supplemental Figure S13. This model not only explains why both the absence and the excess of haspin result in gene downregulation, but also why haspin overexpression has a more severe effect on transcription than haspin knockout.
The co-existence of H3T3ph, H3K4me3 and H3R8me2 in cis was reported originally by Markaki et al.8, analyzing mono-nucleosomal fractions from mitotic Hela cells by mass spectrometry. Another mass spectrometry study has also shown that histone H3 isolated from sorted populations of testicular cells contains H3T3phK4me372. Together with the data reported here, these studies provide compelling evidence for tandem modifications in the histone H3 tail. This is somewhat unexpected because phosphorylation at threonine-3 is known to interfere with trimethylation at lysine-46,12,73. However, the co-existence of mutually interfering and functionally antagonistic modifications is not unprecedented. For example, H3S10ph occurs transiently together with H3K9me374,75.
H3K4me3 is considered an activating histone modification, because it occurs in the promoter regions of transcribed genes76,77. On the other hand, H3R8me2 is known to repress transcription in a variety of cellular systems78,79,80,81. By that measure, the signature H3T3phK4me3R8me2 might contain a “GO” (K4me3), a “STOP” (R8me2) and a “RELAY” (T3ph) signal that function as a compound phospho-methyl switch.
A large body of structural and biochemical data justify this idea. The negative effect of H3T3ph on H3K4me3 binding has been experimentally proven. For instance, H3T3ph reduces binding of the double chromodomain of the ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factor CHD1 to H3K4me3 approximately 25-fold by eliminating an intra-peptide bond between threonine-3 and glutamine-582. Similar effects have been reported with regards to the binding of PHD finger proteins (e.g., DIDO3, ING2, MLL5, RAG2 and TAF3) and the TTD module of the lysine-specific demethylase 4A to H3K4me383,84,85,86,87.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and generation of stable lines
E14 cells were generously provided by Austin Smith’s lab (Cambridge University, UK). They were cultured in Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium (GMEM, Gibco) on plates coated with 0.1% gelatin (Gelatin from bovine skin, Sigma-Aldrich). The medium was supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Biochrom AG), 2 mM penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco), 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco), 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) and LIF (produced in house).
Hela cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biosera), 2 mM penicillin–streptomycin (Biosera) and 2 mM l-glutamine (Biosera). All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator supplemented with 5% CO2.
Differentiation assays were performed using the hanging drop method as described previously in Karanika et al.20.
Five-iodotubercidin (5-ITu) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-3531A) was used for haspin inhibition; BAY-320 (BAYER) for Bub1 inhibition; and BioE-1115 (Millipore) was used for inhibition of the PAS kinase. For exact concentrations used see main text.
For transient transfection assays, episomal plasmid pPyCAGIP carrying haspin-eGFP (20 µg) was introduced into cultured cells by electroporation using an ECM630 apparatus (BTX). 5 × 106 Ε14 cells were resuspended in 400 μl full medium, introduced into a 4-cm electrode gap cuvette and porated at 200 V and 950 µF, 0 Ω. To generate cell lines overexpressing haspin (OE), E14 cells were first transfected as above and 24 h later the standard medium was replaced with one containing 1.5 µg/ml puromycin. Selection was carried out for approximately 2 weeks, until visible healthy colonies appeared. Subsequently, single colonies were picked and transferred into separate wells of a 96-well plate containing 0.5 µg/ml puromycin. When wells reached 80–90% confluency, cells were transferred into a 24-well plate containing 0.5 µg/ml puromycin and subsequently into a 12-well plate containing 0.75 µg/ml puromycin. Two additional passages followed, one in a 6-well plate containing 1 µg/ml puromycin and the last one in a 60 mm plate containing 1.5 µg/ml puromycin.
Haspin-knockout lines were produced as described in Karanika et al.20.
Teratoma formation
The teratoma formation assays were carried out in the laboratory of Dr. Klinakis (Academy of Athens-BRFAA, ethics approval ref. number 6245, ARRIVE guidelines compliant) and were approved by the Directorate for Agricultural Economy and Veterinary Services, Prefecture of Attica, Greece. Initially, the cells were trypsinized, to produce a single cell suspension and counted. Then, 106 cells were transferred into a new tube, centrifuged at 500g for 3 min and resuspended in 0.1 ml PBS. The cell suspension was injected subcutaneously into the thigh of immunodeficient SCID mice using the following scheme: The left thigh of each mouse was used for KO or OE cells and the right for control cells. For each combination, 8 adult animals were used and kept under strictly sterile conditions. Approximately 8 weeks after injection, mice were sacrificed and tumors formed were excised. The specimens were fixed in 4% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Tissues were then cut into 4 μm sections and stained with Haematoxylin–Eosin.
Microscopy
For light microscopy, samples were fixed either with 1% or 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 and blocked with 0.5% fish skin gelatin according to Maison et al.88. Samples were imaged using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope (63x, 100 × magnification lenses, image dimensions 512 × 512, 8-bit), with LAS AF software (Leica Microsystems). Embryoid bodies on Fig. 3a were imaged using Leica DMI6000B microscope (10 × magnification lens), with LAS AF software (Leica Microsystems). All images acquired were further processed using LAS X software (Leica Microsystems).
RNA extraction
Total RNA from cell culture samples was obtained and purified using the RNeasy Protect mini kit (Qiagen). On-column DNase digestion was performed using an RNase-Free DNase set (Qiagen). Total RNA from fresh mouse tissues was isolated using the PureLink RNA mini kit (Invitrogen) and on-column DNA digestion was carried out using the PureLink DNase set (Invitrogen). RNA quantity of all samples was measured using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo) and its quality was assessed by a Βioanalyzer analysis (Agilent). Only high quality RNA was processed further (RIN value > 9 for cell culture samples and > 7.5 for tissue samples).
Quantitative real-time PCR
RT-qPCR was performed as described in Karanika et al.20. Three biological replicates were used for cell culture samples and four for tissue samples. Based on analysis by the geNorm algorithm (Biogazelle), the CYC1-EIF4A2 and GAPDH-RPL13A gene pairs (PrimerDesign) were selected for normalization of the OE and KO RT-qPCR data, respectively. For tissue samples, the following normalization genes were selected: GAPDH, YWHAZ, ACTB, EIF4A2, UBC, CANX, CYC1 and ATP5B. The primer sequences for each presented gene were as follows:
Gene Name | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
---|---|---|
ms/hu haspin-cells | ATGCTGAAAAGGTTTATGGGGA | GGCAGGATTTCCTCAAAGGTTT |
Nanog | CCAGTGGAGTATCCCAGCAT | GTTGGTCCAGGTCTGGTTGT |
Oct4 | TGGGCTAGAGAAGGATGTGG | TGGGAAAGGTGTCCCTGTAG |
Dazl | GCCCGCAAAAGAAGTCTGTG | ACCAACAACCCCCTGAGATG |
Scml2 | CCACTGGGGTACACACTGAAT | CAGCTCCAATTGTGGCAGGA |
mhaspin-tissues | GCCGCGTGTAAAAAGGTTGT | GTTCCCGTTGCTTCTTGCTG |
Data analysis was carried out by the qbase+ analysis software (Biogazelle) according to MIQE guidelines. Statistical analysis in all cases was carried out in qBase+, using one way Anova and Tukey–Kramer post-test for the pairwise group comparisons.
RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis
Total RNA from 3 biological replicates in each case was isolated as described above. To generate sequencing libraries TruSeq stranded mRNA library kit (Illumina) was used with 500 ng total RNA as input. The whole protocol was performed on the Biomek FX laboratory automation workstation (Beckman). Libraries (75 bp reads) were sequenced using the NextSeq 500 system (Illumina) at the Genomics Core Facility, EMBL-Heidelberg, Germany. Subsequent analysis of raw data was carried out on the Chipster platform89. Initially, FastQC was used to assess data quality and Trimmomatic90,91 to perform read trimming. The sequenced reads were aligned using TopHat2 (single end reads, library type: fr-firststrand) on mouse genome GRCm38.87. The aligned reads were counted by HTSeq (union, stranded-reverse) and differential expression analysis was carried out by DeSeq2 (p-value cutoff < 0.05 and |log2 Fold Change| ≥ 1)92,93. Gene Ontology analysis was also performed on the Chipster platform with the “GO enrichment for list of genes” tool. Volcano plot visualization and Manhattan distance calculations were performed using the VolcaNoseR software94. For a detailed list of deregulated genes, please see Supplementary Data I.
Frozen sections
All animal experiments and maintenance were carried out in accordance to the institutional and national guidelines for animal experimentation and were ARRIVE compliant (Ethic approval number: EL33-BIOexp01/7491, Directorate for Agricultural Economy and Veterinary Services, Perfecture of Epirus, Greece). Testes and kidneys from 7dpp, 22dpp, 24dpp, 28dpp and adult mice (C57BL/6J) were collected, embedded in OCT compound and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tissue blocks were sectioned 5 μm thick in a Leica CM 1850 cryotome and processed for indirect immunofluorescence. Frozen sections were fixed with 1% or 4% formaldehyde, blocked with 0.5% fish skin gelatin and 0.2% Triton X-100 according to Maison et al.88. Antibodies used are described in Supplemental materials and methods. Meiotically dividing cells in 22dpp and 28dpp mouse testes were identified according to published observations and images95,96,97.
Histone extraction, immunoprecipitation and western blotting
For total histone extraction, 1 g of testis tissue was decapsulated, thoroughly minced and homogenized (60 strokes on Dounce homogenizer, 3 ml volume capacity). Isotonic buffer containing 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM PMSF was added (1 ml per 200 mg of tissue) and the homogenate underwent further processing in a larger Dounce homogenizer (15 ml volume capacity, 300 strokes). Triton-X100 was then added to the suspension to a final concentration of 0.5%, followed by 15-min incubation on ice. The cytoplasmic and Triton-X soluble fraction was removed by centrifugation (956g/4 °C/5 min) and total histones were extracted from the insoluble residue. To that end, 0.5 N HCl and 10% glycerol (3:1 buffer per pellet volume) were added to the pellet and the suspension was incubated for 30 min on ice. After centrifugation (10,621g/4 °C/5 min), the pH was adjusted to 7.5 with the addition of Trizma base crystals and NaCl was adjusted to 300 mM. All procedures were carried out on ice, in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors (20 mM β-glycerol phosphate, 50 mM NaF, 50 mM sodium orthovanadate, all from Sigma-Aldrich). For immunoprecipitation experiments, histone samples were dialyzed overnight at 4 °C against buffer A (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF), collected and cleared by centrifugation (20,817 g/4 °C/15 min). For blocking purposes, Tween-20 and BSA were added to a final concentration of 0.01% and 0.5%, respectively, to each sample. Subsequently, the samples were incubated with primary antibodies for 3.5 h at 4 °C. Protein G Sepharose beads (Protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow, GE Healthcare, 17-0618-01) were equilibrated with buffer A containing also 0.01% Tween-20 and 0.5% BSA, for 2 h at 4 °C. The sample-antibody mixtures were added to the beads and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. Beads were then washed with buffers B (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF and 0.5% Triton X-100) and C (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM), in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was carried out according to standard procedures. For full length gels and blots, see Supplemental Data III.
Data availability
RNA-Seq data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE154246.
References
Tanaka, H. et al. Identification and characterization of a haploid germ cell-specific nuclear protein kinase (haspin) in spermatid nuclei and its effects on somatic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274(24), 17049–17057. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.24.17049 (1999).
Higgins, J. M. The haspin gene: Location in an intron of the integrin alphaE gene, associated transcription of an integrin alphaE-derived RNA and expression in diploid as well as haploid cells. Gene 267(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00387-0 (2001).
Hindriksen, S. et al. Baculoviral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 facilitates efficient genome editing in human cells. PLoS One 12(6), e0179514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179514 (2017).
Tanaka, H. et al. Cloning and characterization of human haspin gene encoding haploid germ cell-specific nuclear protein kinase. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 7(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/7.3.211 (2001).
Higgins, J. M. G. Structure, function and evolution of haspin and haspin-related proteins, a distinctive group of eukaryotic protein kinases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60(3), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000180300038 (2003).
Eswaran, J. et al. Structure and functional characterization of the atypical human kinase haspin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S A. 106(48), 20198–20203. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901989106 (2009).
Villa, F. et al. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of haspin, an atypical kinase implicated in chromatin organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(48), 20204–20209. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908485106 (2009).
Markaki, Y. et al. Phosphorylation of histone H3 at Thr3 is part of a combinatorial pattern that marks and configures mitotic chromatin. J. Cell Sci. 122(16), 2809–2819. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.043810 (2009).
Higgins, J. M. G. Haspin-like proteins: A new family of evolutionarily conserved putative eukaryotic protein kinases. Protein Sci. 10(8), 1677–1684. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.49901 (2001).
Polioudaki, H. et al. Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 3. FEBS Lett. 560(1–3), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00060-2 (2004).
Dai, J., Sultan, S., Taylor, S. S. & Higgins, J. M. G. The kinase haspin is required for mitotic histone H3 Thr 3 phosphorylation and normal metaphase chromosome alignment. Genes Dev. 19(4), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1267105 (2005).
Wang, F. et al. Histone H3 Thr-3 phosphorylation by haspin positions Aurora B at centromeres in mitosis. Science 330(6001), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189435 (2010).
Kelly, A. E. et al. Survivin reads phosphorylated histone H3 threonine 3 to activate the mitotic kinase Aurora B. Science 330(6001), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189505 (2010).
Yamagishi, Y., Honda, T., Tanno, Y. & Watanabe, Y. Two histone marks establish the inner centromere and chromosome bi-orientation. Science 330(6001), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194498 (2010).
Jeyaprakash, A. A., Basquin, C., Jayachandran, U. & Conti, E. Structural basis for the recognition of phosphorylated histone H3 by the survivin subunit of the chromosomal passenger complex. Structure. 19(11), 1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2011.09.002 (2011).
Carmena, M., Wheelock, M., Funabiki, H. & Earnshaw, W. C. The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): From easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13(12), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3474 (2012).
Dai, J., Sullivan, B. A. & Higgins, J. M. Regulation of mitotic chromosome cohesion by haspin and Aurora B. Dev. Cell 11(5), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.018 (2006).
De Antoni, A., Maffini, S., Knapp, S., Musacchio, A. & Santaguida, S. A small-molecule inhibitor of haspin alters the kinetochore functions of Aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 199(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201205119 (2012).
Wang, F. et al. Haspin inhibitors reveal centromeric functions of Aurora B in chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 199(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201205106 (2012).
Karanika, E. et al. Haspin-dependent and independent effects of the kinase inhibitor 5-Iodotubercidin on self-renewal and differentiation. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54350-4 (2020).
Funabiki, H. & Wynne, D. J. Making an effective switch at the kinetochore by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Chromosoma 122(3), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-013-0401-5 (2013).
Zhou, L. et al. The N-terminal non-kinase-domain-mediated binding of Haspin to Pds5B protects centromeric Cohesion in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 27(7), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.019 (2017).
Liang, C. et al. A kinase-dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting mitotic centromere cohesion. EMBO Rep. 19(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744737 (2018).
Balboula, A. Z. et al. Haspin kinase regulates microtubule-organizing center clustering and stability through Aurora kinase C in mouse oocytes. J. Cell Sci. 129(19), 3648–3660. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.189340 (2016).
Shimada, M. et al. Essential role of autoactivation circuitry on Aurora B-mediated H2AX-pS121 in mitosis. Nat. Commun. 7, 12059. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12059 (2016).
Karakkat, J. V. et al. The metabolic sensor PASK is a histone 3 kinase that also regulates H3K4 methylation by associating with H3K4 MLL2 methyltransferase complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(19), 10086–10103. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz786 (2019).
Qian, J., Lesage, B., Beullens, M., Van Eynde, A. & Bollen, M. PP1/Repo-man dephosphorylates mitotic histone H3 at T3 and regulates chromosomal aurora B targeting. Curr. Biol. 21(9), 766–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.047 (2011).
van de Werken, C. et al. Chromosome segregation regulation in human zygotes: Altered mitotic histone phosphorylation dynamics underlying centromeric targeting of the chromosomal passenger complex. Hum. Reprod. 30(10), 2275–2291. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev186 (2014).
Baron, A. P. et al. Probing the catalytic functions of Bub1 kinase using the small molecule inhibitors BAY-320 and BAY-524. Elife 5, e12187. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12187 (2016).
Bekier, M. E., Mazur, T., Rashid, M. S. & Taylor, W. R. Borealin dimerization mediates optimal CPC checkpoint function by enhancing localization to centromeres and kinetochores. Nat. Commun. 6, 6775. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7775 (2015).
Abad, M. A. et al. Borealin-nucleosome interaction secures chromosome association of the chromosomal passenger complex. J. Cell Biol. 218(12), 3912–3925. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201905040 (2019).
Fresan, U., Rodriguez-Sanchez, M. A., Reina, O., Corces, V. G. & Espinas, M. L. Haspin kinase modulates nuclear architecture and Polycomb-dependent gene silencing. PLoS Genet. 16(8), e1008962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008962 (2020).
Hasegawa, K. et al. SCML2 establishes the male germline epigenome through regulation of histone H2A ubiquitination. Dev. Cell 32(5), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.014 (2015).
Luo, M. et al. Polycomb protein SCML2 associates with USP7 and counteracts histone H2A ubiquitination in the XY chromatin during male meiosis. PLoS Genet. 11(1), e1004954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004954 (2015).
Maezawa, S. et al. Polycomb protein SCML2 facilitates H3K27me3 to establish bivalent domains in the male germline. PNAS 115(19), 4957–4962. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804512115 (2018).
Xu, X. et al. Mouse Dazl and its novel splice variant functions in translational repression of target mRNAs in embryonic stem cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829(5), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.12.010 (2013).
Kleene, K. C. Connecting cis-elements and trans-factors with mechanisms of developmental regulation of mRNA translation in meiotic and haploid mammalian spermatogenic cells. Reproduction 146(1), R1–R19. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-12-0362 (2013).
Vernet, N. et al. The Y-encoded gene zfy2 acts to remove cells with unpaired chromosomes at the first meiotic metaphase in male mice. Curr. Biol. 21(9), 787–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.057 (2011).
Vernet, N. et al. Mouse Y-linked Zfy1 and Zfy2 are expressed during the male-specific interphase between meiosis I and meiosis II and promote the 2nd meiotic division. PLoS Genet. 10(6), e1004444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.057 (2014).
Vernet, N., Mahadevaiah, S. K., de Rooij, D. G., Burgoyne, P. S. & Ellis, P. Zfy genes are required for efficient meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI) in spermatocytes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25(24), 5300–5310. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw344 (2016).
Vernet, N. et al. Mouse Y-encoded transcription factor Zfy2 is essential for sperm head remodelling and sperm tail development. PLoS One 11(1), e0145398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145398 (2016).
Hu, Y. C. & Namekawa, S. H. Functional significance of the sex chromosomes during spermatogenesis. Reproduction 149(6), R265–R277. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0613 (2015).
Nakasuji, T. et al. Complementary critical functions of Zfy1 and Zfy2 in mouse spermatogenesis and reproduction. PLoS Genet. 13(1), e1006578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006578 (2017).
Kay, G. F. et al. A candidate spermatogenesis gene on the mouse Y chromosome is homologous to ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1. Nature 354(6353), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/354486a0 (1991).
Lévy, N., Navarro, A., Bishop, C. E. & Mitchell, M. J. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 homologous genes on the mouse Y chromosome (Ube1y) represent one functional gene and six partial pseudogenes. Mamm. Genome 11(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003350010031 (2000).
Chen, C. et al. Ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 inhibitor PYR41 attenuates angiotensin II-induced activation of dendritic cells via the IκBa/NF-κB and MKP1/ERK/STAT1 pathways. Immunology 142(2), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12255 (2014).
Song, B. et al. Association of genetic variants in SOHLH1 and SOHLH2 with non-obstructive azoospermia risk in the Chinese population. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 184, 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.003 (2015).
Zhang, X. et al. Immunohistochemical study of expression of Sohlh1 and Sohlh2 in normal adult human tissues. PLoS One 10(9), e0137431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137431 (2015).
Park, M. et al. SOHLH2 is essential for synaptonemal complex formation during spermatogenesis in early postnatal mouse testes. Sci. Rep. 12(6), 20980. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20980 (2016).
MartinGonzalez, J. et al. Embryonic stem cell culture conditions support distinct states associated with different developmental stages and potency. Stem Cell Rep. 7(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.07.009 (2016).
Zhou, J. et al. Nxf3 is expressed in Sertoli cells, but is dispensable for spermatogenesis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 78(4), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21291 (2011).
Yin, Y. et al. Nuclear export factor 3 is involved in regulating the expression of TGF-β3 in an mRNA export activity-independent manner in mouse Sertoli cells. Biochem. J. 452(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20121006 (2013).
Crackower, M. A. et al. Essential role of Fkbp6 in male fertility and homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis. Science 300(5623), 1291–1295. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083022 (2003).
Yamauchi, Y., Riel, J. M., Ruthig, V. & Ward, M. A. Mouse Y-encoded transcription factor Zfy2 is essential for sperm formation and function in assisted fertilization. PLoS Genet. 11(12), e1005476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005476 (2015).
Yamauchi, Y. et al. Two genes substitute for the mouse Y chromosome for spermatogenesis and reproduction. Science 351(6272), 514–516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad1795 (2016).
Li, N. et al. EIF2S3Y suppresses the pluripotency state and promotes the proliferation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Oncotarget 7(10), 11321–11331. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7187 (2016).
Kim, J., Bergmann, A., Wehri, E., Lu, X. & Stubbs, L. Imprinting and evolution of two Kruppel-type zinc-finger genes, ZIM3 and ZNF264, located in the PEG3/USP29 imprinted domain. Genomics 77(1–2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.2001.6621 (2001).
Sakai, K. et al. Usp26 mutation in mice leads to defective spermatogenesis depending on genetic background. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 13757. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50318-6 (2019).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: Protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(D1), D607–D613. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1131 (2019).
Shpargel, K. B., Sengoku, T., Yokoyama, S. & Magnuson, T. UTX and UTY demonstrate histone demethylase-independent function in mouse embryonic development. PLoS Genet. 8(9), e1002964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002964 (2012).
Walport, L. J. et al. Human UTY (KDM6C) is a male-specific Nϵ-methyl lysyl demethylase. J. Biol. Chem. 289(26), 18302–18313. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.555052 (2014).
Clermont, Y. Cycle de l’épithélium séminal et mode de renouvellement des spermatogonies chez le hamster [Cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and mode of renewal of spermatogonia in the hamster]. Revue Can. Biol. 13(3), 208–245 (1954).
Oakberg, E. F. A description of spermiogenesis in the mouse and its use in analysis of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and germ cell renewal. Am. J. Anat. 99(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000990303 (1956).
Oakberg, E. F. Duration of Spermatogenesis in the mouse and timing οf stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Am. J. Anat. 99(3), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000990307 (1956).
da Cruz, I. et al. Transcriptome analysis of highly purified mouse spermatogenic cell populations: Gene expression signatures switch from meiotic-to postmeiotic-related processes at pachytene stage. BMC Genomics 17, 294. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2618-1 (2016).
Zeitlin, S. G., Barber, C. M., Allis, C. D. & Sullivan, K. F. Differential regulation of CENP-A and histone H3 phosphorylation in G2/M. J. Cell Sci. 114(Pt 4), 653–661 (2001).
Liang, C. et al. Centromere-localized Aurora B kinase is required for the fidelity of chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 219(2), e201907092. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201907092 (2020).
Broad, A. J., DeLuca, K. F. & DeLuca, J. G. Aurora B kinase is recruited to multiple discrete kinetochore and centromere regions in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 219(3), e201905144. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201905144 (2020).
Hadders, M. A. et al. Untangling the contribution of haspin and Bub1 to Aurora B function during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 219(3), e201907087. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201907087 (2020).
Jeffery, C. J. Protein moonlighting: What is it, and why is it important?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B373, 20160523. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0523 (2017).
Vastenhouw, N. L. & Schier, A. F. Bivalent histone modifications in early embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24(3), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.03.009 (2012).
Luense, L. J. et al. Comprehensive analysis of histone post-translational modifications in mouse and human male germ cells. Epigenetics Chromatin 9, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-016-0072-6 (2016).
Karimi-Ashtiyani, R. & Houben, A. In vitro phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 3 by Arabidopsis haspin is strongly influenced by posttranslational modifications of adjacent amino acids. Mol. Plant. 6(2), 574–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss149 (2013).
Fischle, W. et al. Regulation of HP1-chromatin binding by histone H3 methylation and phosphorylation. Nature 438(7071), 1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04219 (2005).
Hirota, T., Lipp, J. J., Toh, B. H. & Peters, J. M. Histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation by Aurora B causes HP1 dissociation from heterochromatin. Nature 438(7071), 1176–1180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04254 (2005).
Soares, L. M. et al. Determinants of histone H3K4 methylation patterns. Mol. Cell 68(4), 773-785.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.013 (2017).
Hyun, K., Jeon, J., Park, K. & Kim, J. Writing, erasing and reading histone lysine methylations. Exp. Mol. Med. 49(4), e324. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2017.11 (2017).
Pal, S., Vishwanath, S. N., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P. & Sif, S. Human SWI/SNF-associated PRMT5 methylates histone H3 arginine 8 and negatively regulates expression of ST7 and NM23 tumor suppressor genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24(21), 9630–9645. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.21.9630-9645.2004 (2004).
Wang, Z. et al. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 40(7), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.154 (2008).
Majumder, S. et al. Methylation of histone H3 and H4 by PRMT5 regulates ribosomal RNA gene transcription. J. Cell. Biochem. 109(3), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.22432 (2010).
Bedford, M. T. & Richard, S. Arginine methylation an emerging regulator of protein function. Mol. Cell. 18(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.003 (2005).
Flanagan, J. F. et al. Double chromodomains cooperate to recognize the methylated histone H3 tail. Nature 438(7071), 1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04290 (2005).
Lee, J., Thompson, J. R., Botuyan, M. V. & Mer, G. Distinct binding modes specify the recognition of methylated histones H3K4 and H4K20 by JMJD2A-Tudor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15(1), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1326 (2008).
Garske, A. L. et al. Combinatorial profiling of chromatin binding modules reveals multisite discrimination. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6(4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.319 (2010).
Varier, R. A. et al. A phospho/methyl switch at histone H3 regulates TFIID association with mitotic chromosomes. EMBO J. 29(23), 3967–3978. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.261 (2010).
Gatchalian, J. et al. Chromatin condensation and recruitment of PHD finger proteins to histone H3K4me3 are mutually exclusive. Nucleic Acids Res. 44(13), 6102–6112. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw193 (2016).
Ali, M. et al. Molecular basis for chromatin binding and regulation of MLL5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(28), 11296–11301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310156110 (2013).
Maison, C., Horstmann, H. & Georgatos, S. D. Regulated docking of nuclear membrane vesicles to vimentin filaments during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 123(6), 1491–1505. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.123.6.1491 (1993).
Kallio, M. A. et al. Chipster: User-friendly analysis software for microarray and other high-throughput data. BMC Genomics 12, 507. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-507 (2011).
Andrews, S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (2010).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15), 2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 (2014).
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31(2), 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 (2015).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15(12), 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).
Goedhart, J. & Luijsterburg, M. S. VolcaNoseR is a web app for creating, exploring, labeling and sharing volcano plots. Sci. Rep. 10, 20560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76603-3 (2020).
Cobb, J., Miyaike, M., Kikuchi, A. & Handel, M. A. Meiotic events at the centromeric heterochromatin: Histone H3 phosphorylation, topoisomerase II alpha localization and chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 108(7), 412–425 (1999).
Parra, M. T. et al. Dynamic relocalization of the chromosomal passenger complex proteins inner centromere protein (INCENP) and aurora-B kinase during male mouse meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 116(Pt 6), 961–974 (2003).
Parra, M. T. et al. Sequential assembly of centromeric proteins in male mouse meiosis. PLoS Genet. 5(3), e1000417 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank V. Benes (EMBL-Heidelberg, Germany) for advice on designing the amplicon and RNA-seq experiments, G. Markopoulos (University of Ioannina, Greece) for help in FACS experiments, D. Thanos (Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Greece) for donating equipment and A. Smith (University of Cambridge, UK), P.B. Singh (Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Germany), S.H. Namekawa (University of Cincinnati, USA), A. Tzioufas (University of Athens, Greece) for kindly providing cell lines and antibodies.
Funding
This work was supported by funds from the Operational Program “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning” (MIS: 5047628), co-financed by Greece and the European Union. Publication cost was covered in part by the Research Committee, University of Ioannina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.S., E.K., F.K., A.C. and Z.K. performed experiments; Y.S. and P.T. contributed in bioinformatics data analysis; K.S. performed statistical data analysis; A.B., A.K. and A.S.P. designed and supervised part of the experimental work; S.G. conceived the project, designed and supervised the experimental work, carried out data interpretation and wrote the paper with input from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Soupsana, K., Karanika, E., Kiosse, F. et al. Distinct roles of haspin in stem cell division and male gametogenesis. Sci Rep 11, 19901 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99307-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99307-8
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Release of Histone H3K4-reading transcription factors from chromosomes in mitosis is independent of adjacent H3 phosphorylation
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Haspin balances the ratio of asymmetric cell division through Wnt5a and regulates cell fate decisions in mouse embryonic stem cells
Cell Death Discovery (2023)
-
Global phosphoproteomic analysis identified key kinases regulating male meiosis in mouse
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2022)