Abstract
As most COVID-19 patients only receive thoracic CT scans, but body composition, which is relevant to detect sarcopenia, is determined in abdominal scans, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between thoracic and abdominal CT body composition parameters in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. This retrospective study included n = 46 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients who received CT scans of the thorax and abdomen due to severe disease progression. The subcutaneous fat area (SF), the skeletal muscle area (SMA), and the muscle radiodensity attenuation (MRA) were measured at the level of the twelfth thoracic (T12) and the third lumbar (L3) vertebra. Necessity of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), length of stay, or time to death (TTD) were noted. For statistics correlation, multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox regression analyses were employed. Correlation was excellent for the SF (r = 0.96) between T12 and L3, and good for the respective SMA (r = 0.80) and MRA (r = 0.82) values. With adjustment (adj.) for sex, age, and body-mass-index the variability of SF (adj. r2 = 0.93; adj. mean difference = 1.24 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.02–1.45]), of the SMA (adj. r2 = 0.76; 2.59 [95% CI 1.92–3.26]), and of the MRA (adj. r2 = 0.67; 0.67 [95% CI 0.45–0.88]) at L3 was well explained by the respective values at T12. There was no relevant influence of the SF, MRA, or SMA on the clinical outcome. If only thoracic CT scans are available, CT body composition values at T12 can be used to predict abdominal fat and muscle parameters, by which sarcopenia and obesity can be assessed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity have a worldwide prevalence over 10%1,2 and are associated with longer hospitalization stays3 and mortality4. In COVID-19 patients, a loss of lean muscle mass over the disease period has been described5, and a better thoracic muscle quality has been shown to be a protective factor against hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and death6. Also, obesity has been found to be significantly associated with higher hospitalization rates, IMV, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death7, while visceral and muscular fat amounts were related to the probability of ICU admission8,9,10.
In cases of suspected sarcopenia (e.g., reduced muscle strength) it is recommended to measure muscle quality and quantity11. To this purpose magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), between which body compositions results have been found to agree well12, are considered the gold standard11. In CT scans, which severely ill patients frequently receive, body composition measurements at the height of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) best represent the whole-body fat and muscle mass13. CT body composition parameters at L3 have been found to be of predictive value in many entities including COVID-199,10,14. However, most COVID-19 patients only receive chest X-rays or thoracic CT scans and while there are reviews with hundreds of studies on abdominal CT body composition measurements15,16 experience on thoracic CT body composition parameters is less profound, with especially few studies on thoracic CT body composition assessment in COVID-195,6,17. Furthermore, no consensus exists on which thoracic muscle groups to employ and proposed thoracic cut-off values to assess sarcopenia vary18,19,20,21. To profit from the experience on abdominal CT body composition parameters and reliably assess sarcopenia in patients who only receive thoracic CT scans, prediction of abdominal parameters would thus be of interest.
Therefore, it was the purpose of this study to evaluate the predictability of abdominal body composition parameters by thoracic CT parameters in a cohort of COVID-19 patients.
Methods
Study population
This explorative retrospective study was approved by the local ethics board (Ärztekammer Hamburg, Germany) with a waiver of informed written consent (WF-024/21). Study protocols and procedures were conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Inclusion criteria were a RT-PCR positive test of SARS-CoV-2 and a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the thorax and abdomen between May 2020 and December 2020 at our University Medical Hospital. If patients received several CT scans during their hospitalization, the first scan was used. Exclusion criteria were: (a) non-ICU patients to generate a more homogenous collective, and (b) non-contrast-enhanced examinations because the muscle radiodensity attenuation (MRA) would differ between contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced scans22, which biases comparability between patients if no dual-energy CT scans for contrast-agent independent muscle characterization are available23. Furthermore, patients were excluded if their CT scans showed (c) artifacts in the paravertebral muscle, e.g., due to osteosynthesis material, (d) did not include the whole abdominal muscle area, or (e) displayed an open abdomen, as all of this could hinder the determination of the skeletal muscle area (SMA) and MRA at L3. In total n = 46 patients were included.
CT scan and analysis
CT (SOMATOM Force®, Siemens Healthineers, Germany) parameters were 100/Sn150 kV, pitch 0.5, collimation 0.6 mm, and reconstructed slice thickness 5 mm. Image acquisition started 80 s after injection of contrast agent (Iomeprol [Imeron 350 M, Bracco IMAGING, Italy]).
An axial CT slice at the mid-height of the 12th thoracic vertebra (T12) and L3, respectively, on which both transverse processes were equally depicted, was exported and further processed with the open-source software ImageJ (National Institutes of Health and the Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, USA)24. At the level of L3, the abdominal muscles' outer and inner perimeter and the perimeter of L3 were manually contoured (Fig. 1a). The SMA was then determined by applying a muscle-specific threshold (− 29 to + 150 Hounsfield units (HU)) according to Gomez-Perez et al.25. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated from the SMA by correction for body size (SMA [cm2]/height2 [m2]). Additional regions of interest (ROI) were drawn along the waist circumference (WC) and around the whole abdominal muscles' circumference at L3. The subcutaneous fat area (SF) was calculated by subtracting the outer muscle area from the whole body area (WC ROI) after application of a fat-specific threshold (− 190 to − 30 HU) (Fig. 1b). The visceral fat area was given by the ROI along the abdominal muscles' inner perimeter and the fat-specific threshold (Fig. 1c). The MRA was determined from the whole abdominal muscle at L3 after application of the muscle-specific threshold (Fig. 1d) to avoid underestimation of myosteotosis which can occur if measurements are restricted to, e.g., the psoas muscle26. Whole-body fat mass [kg] and visceral fat mass [kg] were calculated as proposed by Zopf et al., who have proven good agreement to bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) body composition results13.
At the level of T12, ROIs were defined along the WC, the outer muscle perimeter, and the posterior paraspinal muscles' circumference. The SF area was given by subtraction of the outer muscle area from the whole-body area (WC ROI) and the fat-specific threshold (Fig. 1e). As the ribs could bias determination of the intercostal muscle area, the SMA and MRA at T12 were solely noted for the posterior paraspinal muscles (Fig. 1f). Finally, a recently proposed fat to muscle ratio (FMR) on thoracic CT scans of COVID-19 patients was calculated by: WC at T12/((circumference of the right posterior paraspinal muscle + circumference of the left posterior paraspinal muscle)/2)17.
Clinical parameters and sarcopenia classification
The clinical parameters necessity of IMV, length of stay until hospital discharge, or time to death (censoring 15th February 2021) were noted. Patients' weight was classified according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) weight classes27. Patients were classified as sarcopenic based on their MRA using the sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) specific 5th percentile of van der Werf et al.28. As different SMI cut-offs have been suggested and are applied for Caucasian populations in the literature, SMI values were categorized as sarcopenic according to three widely used systems: the sex-specific cut-offs of Prado et al.29, the sex-specific cut-offs of Martin et al.30, which for men also consider the BMI, and the sex-, age-, and BMI-specific percentiles of van der Werf et al.28.
Statistics
For patients' characteristics absolute and relative numbers for categorical data and mean with standard deviation or median, maximum, and minimum for continuous data were reported.
For correlation between the normally distributed variables at T12 and L3 (WC T12 to WC L3, SF T12 to SF L3, MRA T12 to MRA L3, SMA T12 to SMA L3), Pearson's correlation was applied. Agreement between the WC at T12 and L3, and the respective values of the SF, MRA, and SMA was evaluated by Bland–Altman analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For predictability of the WC, SF, MRA, and SMA at L3 by the respective values on T12 and between the FMR at T12 and the SMA at L3 multivariable linear regression analyses were employed. To investigate the relationship between CT measurements and the metric outcome variable “length of stay” (skewed data distribution) Spearman's correlation was used. For the CT measurements' relation to the nominal clinical outcome variable “IMV” multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed, for the “time to death” Cox regression was used. All regression analyses with CT measurements as independent variables were adjusted (adj.) for sex, age, and BMI.
Multivariable logistic regression was applied to investigate the relationship between the sarcopenia classification results of Prado et al., Martin et al., and van der Werf et al. and the outcome variable “IMV”. For evaluation of the influence of the sarcopenia classification results on “time to death” a Cox regression was applied. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine the relation of the sarcopenia classification results to the logarithmized variable “length of stay”. Because the sarcopenia classification systems in part already include sex, age, and BMI, these analyses were not adj. for sex, age, or BMI.
Because of the explorative study design no post-hoc power analysis was performed31, all given p-value are thus descriptive, and no adjustment for multiple testing was conducted.
Results
Study population
Of 46 included patients 19 (41.3%) were female and 27 (58.7%) were male. Mean age was 64.4 years with a standard deviation (SD) of ± 11.4, a minimum of 29 years, and a maximum of 84 years. Mean BMI was 27.3 kg/m2 ± 6.2 SD. According to the WHO's classification, most patients were classified as obese grade I (≥ 25 kg/m2)27. Male patients had a slightly lower mean BMI with a smaller SD (26.2 kg/m2 ± 5.6) than women (29.2 kg/m2 ± 6.9). Of 39 (84.8%) patients who required IMV, 19 were female (48.7% out of 39) and 27 male (69.2% out of 39). The median length of stay at ICU was 23 days, with 15 days for female and 29 days for male patients. Variance was large with a one-day minimum and 233 days maximum length of stay. At the end of study, 26 patients (56.5%), of which 8 were female (30.8% out of 26) and 18 were male (69.2% out of 26), were deceased. 17 patients (37.0%) were discharged.
Most common comorbidities were arterial hypertension (n = 25, 54.3%) and type II diabetes (n = 23, 50.0%), followed by cardiovascular diseases, e.g., post myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, coronary heart disease (n = 16, 34.8%), cancer -mostly leukemia and lymphoma- (n = 12, 26.1%), and renal failure (n = 7, 15.2%). 22 (47.8%) patients were dependent on intermittent or continuous dialysis and 13 (28.3%) patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy.
Distribution of CT body composition parameters and sarcopenia
Sex-specific mean values and SD of all CT parameters, the SMI, BMI, visceral and body fat mass are provided in Table 1.
In men, MRA values at T12 and L3 were slightly higher (T12: 39.2 HU; L3: 33.8 HU), which indicated less fat accumulation within the muscle fibers, than in women (38.6 HU; 32.1 HU). However, compared to the sex-, age-, and BMI-specific percentiles of van der Werf et al. for the MRA at L3, more men were below the 5th percentile (n = 26, 56.5%) and thus considered to have low muscle quality, than women (n = 17, 37.0%). Like the BMI, the subcutaneous fat area, the visceral fat mass, and whole-body fat mass were smaller in male patients (Table 1). The SMI could be determined for 20 male and 12 female patients, for whom body height was given. Judged by the sarcopenia cut-off values, men in this study collective were sarcopenic up to two times more often than women. In detail: according to the cut-off values for the SMI of Prado et al.29 18 men and six women were sarcopenic, by the cut-off for the SMI of Martin et al.30 17 men and seven women. 11 male patients and three female patients were below the sex-, age-, and BMI-specific 5th percentile for the SMI proposed by van der Werf et al.28, while five male and three female patients were below the 5th percentile for the MRA. An overview of the sex-specific distribution of sarcopenia classification results and variance of fat as well as muscle parameters at L3 is provided in Fig. 2.
Relationship between CT parameters at T12 and L3
Correlation of the WC (r = 0.93), SF (r = 0.96), MRA (r = 0.82), and the SMA (r = 0.80) between T12 and L3 was strong. Agreement between WC values at T12 and L3 (ICC: 0.901 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.778–0.951]) was good with a mean difference of 2.86 cm [95% CI − 7.64 to 13.35]. For the MRA of the paraspinal muscle at T12 and the whole abdominal muscle at L3 agreement was moderate (0.750 [95% CI 0.412–0.882]) with a mean difference of − 5.8 HU [95% CI − 22.3 to 10.7]. The 95% CI of the ICC for the SF at T12 and L3 was large (0.722 [95% CI − 0.070 to 0.917]), as was the mean difference with 85.55 cm2 [95% CI − 8.58 to 179.68]. As expected, the paraspinal muscle area at T12 differed from that of the whole abdominal muscle at L3 (ICC: 0.067 [95% CI − 0.043 to 0.254]) with a mean difference of 90.52 cm2 [95% CI 27.41–153.63].
Concerning the predictability of the abdominal body compositions parameters by thoracic values, with adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, the SF area at T12 explained the SF area's variation at L3 well (adj. r2 = 0.93) (Table 2, Fig. 3). An increase of the SF area at T12 by 1 cm2 was mirrored by an adj. mean increase of the SF area at L3 by 1.24 cm2 (95% CI 1.02–1.45) (Table 2). Comparably, results were good for the MRA (adj. r2 = 0.67): an increase of 1 HU at T12 was mirrored by an adj. mean increase of 0.67 HU (95% CI 0.45–0.88) at L3 (Fig. 3). The model also fitted well for the paraspinal muscle area at T12 and the whole abdominal muscle area (SMA) at L3 (adj. r2 = 0.76; adj. mean difference = 2.59 [95% CI 1.92–3.26]).
With adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, less variation of the SMA at L3 or the SMI was explained by the FMR (adj. r2 = 0.35; adj. r2 = 0.11). An increase of the FMR by one point, which can be caused by an increase of the WC or decrease of the posterior paraspinal muscle circumference, was associated with an adj. mean decrease of the SMA of 18.63 cm2 with a large confidence interval (95% CI − 35.08 to − 2.18) (Table 2, Fig. 3).
Association between CT parameters and the clinical outcome
No relationship between the SMA, the SMI, the MRA, the subcutaneous or visceral fat area, the visceral or total body fat mass, the FMR, and the clinical outcome parameters length of stay, IMV, or time to death was found (Table 3). Similarly, there was no relevant association between patients who were classified as sarcopenic by the cut-off-based systems of Prado et al., Martin et al., or van der Werf et al. and length of stay, IMV, or time to death (Table 3).
The correlation and regression results for metric CT body composition parameters and the cut-off-based sarcopenia classification systems to length of stay, IMV, and time to death are listed in Table 3. The corresponding results of the adjusting variables are additionally provided in the Supplement Table 1.
Discussion
The main findings of this study are that fat and muscle parameters measured on axial CT slices at the level of T12 and L3 correlate well and that in patients who only receive thoracic CT scans, like most COVID-19 patients, T12 values can be used to predict L3 values, for which long-term experience in determining sarcopenia and obesity exists.
The importance of CT body composition measurements is due to the fact that in contrast to two-dimensional techniques as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, no assumptions on the distribution of muscle and fat compartments are necessary32 and opposed to BIA CT results are less influenced by the patient's hydrational status33. Of the multiple studies and reviews which have been published on CT body composition34,35,36, studies which investigated fat or muscle parameters at other heights than L3 are the minority. Concerning other abdominal levels, e.g., only one out 20 studies in a review addressing body composition measurements in cancer34, and 18 out of 177 studies in a review on the MRA36 were not carried out at the level of L3. This may be explicable by the fact that the highest correlation of the skeletal muscle area to the whole-body muscle volume was described for analyses in the region of L337,38. Similarly, compared to number of studies at the level of L3 there are few studies on thoracic CT body composition measurements, e.g., in patients with lung cancer39,40, or aortic valve repairment20,21. In COVID-19, studies on thoracic body composition measurements have been carried out at the height of the 7th and 8th thoracic vertebra6, at T125,17, and for different muscle groups like the pectoralis muscle6 or the autochthones spine muscle5,17. The variation of measurement levels, of employed muscle groups, and the difference between proposed thoracic cut-off values for sarcopenia detection19,20,21, however, illustrate the lack of experience with thoracic CT body composition measurements. This supports the alternative approach, pursued by this study, of using thoracic measurements to predict abdominal body composition values, for which interpretation considerably more experience exists.
When comparing this study’s results to the literature, correlation results (SMA r = 0.80, MRA r = 0.82) are comparable to that of Derstine et al., who described moderate to excellent agreement for the correlation between all levels from T10 to L5 (SMA r = 0.65–0.95, MRA r = 0.63–0.95)19. As the SMI (SMA/height2) is regularly based on measurements at the L3 landmark11, it was not calculated for T12 in this study. Instead, the correlation for the SMA at T12 and L3 (r = 0.8) was investigated, which was in the same range as the results of Nemec et al., who determined and correlated the SMI at both levels (r = 0.71)20.
Regarding agreement between values at T12 and L3, only the WC showed good agreement, while for the MRA agreement was moderate. This is in accordance with Derstine et al. who described a significant variance of MRA values between T11 and L5 and 17 other thoracic and lumbar vertebrae pairings. It can thus be argued that MRA differences between the variable measurement heights are at least likely and thoracic MRA values cannot be simply considered representative for L3 values. Instead, the exact relation between T12 and L3 values as investigated in this study needs to be known.
Concerning regression results, compared to the results of Nemec et al., who modeled the SMI at T12 (men r2 = 0.546, women r2 = 0.477) by L3 SMI values20, the model for the SMA at L3 by T12 values in this study explained more of the variance (r2 = 0.76). Similarly, more of the L3 variance for both the SMA (r2 = 0.76) and MRA (r2 = 0.67) was explained in this study, than by a model of the SMI calculated for the 4th thoracic vertebra (T4) and L3 (male: r2 = 0.5, female r2 = 0.28) or the MRA at T4 and L3 (male: r2 = 0.50, female: r2 = 0.58)41. Compared to a study which used multivariable regression analysis to predict L3 values by the cervical muscle area (r = 0.785), this study’s result for the SMA (r = 0.76) are in good agreement.
That male patients were more often classified as sarcopenic in this study, is in accordance with previous findings. For example, Iannuzzi-Sucich et al. who assessed sarcopenia by BIA and clinical testing in a healthy older population, found men to be sarcopenic 4% more often than women, a discrepancy which increased in the age cohort of those over 80 years42. Similarly, higher rates of sarcopenic male patients have been described in some CT based body composition studies43,44. However, it should be noted that contradictory study results with a slightly higher sarcopenia prevalence among women have also been published45 and that the patient number of this study’s collective was limited.
Surprisingly, nearly no association was found between body composition parameters and the outcome variables length of stay, IMV, or time to death. Besides the overall patient number, this might be due to the study collective which consisted of already severely ill ICU patients, who furthermore had variable primary conditions (e.g., leukemia, cardiac, or renal primary conditions). Moreover, the predefined inclusion criterium of a CT scan of the thorax and abdomen, which in COVID-19 patients is only performed if an additional abdominal issue, e.g., due to rising lactate is suspected or for vascular imaging before installation of an ECMO therapy, caused a further selection of extremely ill patients. It is likely that in such study collective body composition parameters have less influence on the clinical outcome than other influencing factors as, e.g., bacterial superinfection, thrombosis, embolism, or bleeding. However, the negative impact of sarcopenia on the clinical outcome in the healthy older population11,46,47 is known, and effects of obesity7,8, reduced muscle mass10, or muscle quality6 on COVID-19 patients have been described. Also, while no association for the FMR to IMV or time to death was found, Kottlors et al. have described its use to predict ICU admission17. Determination of muscle and fat parameters at L3 to detect sarcopenia, obesity, or sarcopenic obesity more reliably than by the body weight or BMI, is thus nevertheless relevant to ensure best nutritional support and physical therapy in COVID-19-patients.
Limitations of this study are the heterogeneity of the study collective, the missing body size in 14 patients which reduced group size for the SMI analysis and thus SMI-based sarcopenia classification, and the overall patient number. This is because COVID-19 patients beside chest X-rays mostly receive thoracic CT scans. The number of patients, who, due to severe disease progression or complications, needed CT scans of the thorax and abdomen was thus limited. However, all patients who received CT scans of the thorax and abdomen during the study period were included. The restricted number of COVID-19 patients with CT scans of the thorax and abdomen also highlights the relevance of this study: to evaluate the predictability of established abdominal fat and muscle parameters by thoracic values in patients who only receive thoracic CT scans.
Concerning future studies, it would be interesting to apply this study’s results to less seriously ill COVID-19 patients with thoracic CT scans, to better evaluate the relation of the predicted abdominal CT values to the clinical outcome. In this context care should be taken to not only employ cut-off-based sarcopenia classification systems, which inherently results in a loss of information but as done in this study additionally perform analyses of the metric measurement data. Finally, to improve measurement speed and prospectively include CT body composition measurements into clinical routine the use of (semi)automated body composition analyzes as evaluated for abdominal CT slices should be investigated for thoracic scans as well48.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that CT body composition parameters at L3 may be predicted by fat and muscle measurements at T12. In patients who only receive thoracic CT scans, as most COVID-19 patients, conclusions on abdominal CT body composition parameters, for which long-term experience in the detection of sarcopenia and obesity exists, can thus be derived.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Batsis, J. A., Mackenzie, T. A., Emeny, R. T., Lopez-Jimenez, F. & Bartels, S. J. Low lean mass with and without obesity, and mortality: Results from the 1999–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72, 1445–1451 (2017).
Shafiee, G. et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: A systematic review and meta-analysis of general population studies. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 16, 21 (2017).
Gariballa, S. & Alessa, A. Sarcopenia: Prevalence and prognostic significance in hospitalized patients. Clin. Nutr. 32, 772–776 (2013).
Roh, E. & Choi, K. M. Health consequences of sarcopenic obesity: A narrative review. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 11, 332 (2020).
Gualtieri, P. et al. Body composition findings by computed tomography in SARS-CoV-2 patients: Increased risk of muscle wasting in obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4670 (2020).
Besutti, G. et al. The impact of chest CT body composition parameters on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. PLoS ONE 16, e0251768 (2021).
Huang, Y. et al. Obesity in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism 113, 154378 (2020).
Watanabe, M. et al. Visceral fat shows the strongest association with the need of intensive care in patients with COVID-19. Metabolism 111, 154319 (2020).
Bunnell, K. M. et al. Body composition predictors of outcome in patients with COVID-19. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 45, 2238–2243 (2021).
McGovern, J. et al. Relation between body composition, systemic inflammatory response, and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to an urban teaching hospital with COVID-19. J. Nutr. 151, 2236–2244 (2021).
Cruz-Jentoft, A. J. et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 48, 16–31 (2019).
Khan, A. I. et al. MRI quantitation of abdominal skeletal muscle correlates with CT-based analysis: Implications for sarcopenia measurement. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 44, 814–819 (2019).
Zopfs, D. et al. Single-slice CT measurements allow for accurate assessment of sarcopenia and body composition. Eur. Radiol. 30, 1701–1708 (2020).
Chandarana, H. et al. Association of body composition parameters measured on CT with risk of hospitalization in patients with Covid-19. Eur. J. Radiol. 145, 110031 (2021).
McGovern, J., Dolan, R. D., Horgan, P. G., Laird, B. J. & McMillan, D. C. Computed tomography-defined low skeletal muscle index and density in cancer patients: Observations from a systematic review. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 12, 1408–1417 (2021).
Amini, B., Boyle, S. P., Boutin, R. D. & Lenchik, L. Approaches to assessment of muscle mass and myosteatosis on computed tomography: A systematic review. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 74, 1671–1678 (2019).
Kottlors, J. et al. Body composition on low dose chest CT is a significant predictor of poor clinical outcome in COVID-19 disease—A multicenter feasibility study. Eur. J. Radiol. 132, 109274 (2020).
Derstine, B. A. et al. Quantifying sarcopenia reference values using lumbar and thoracic muscle areas in a healthy population. J. Nutr. Health Aging 21, 180–185 (2017).
Derstine, B. A. et al. Skeletal muscle cutoff values for sarcopenia diagnosis using T10 to L5 measurements in a healthy US population. Sci. Rep. 8, 11369 (2018).
Nemec, U., Heidinger, B., Sokas, C., Chu, L. & Eisenberg, R. L. Diagnosing sarcopenia on thoracic computed tomography: Quantitative assessment of skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Acad. Radiol. 24, 1154–1161 (2017).
Panthofer, A. M., Olson, S. L., Harris, D. G. & Matsumura, J. S. Derivation and validation of thoracic sarcopenia assessment in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 69, 1379–1386 (2019).
Feng, Z., Rong, P., Luo, M., Sun, X. & Wang, W. Influence of methods used to establish sarcopenia cutoff values for skeletal muscle measures using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. JPEN 43, 1028–1036 (2019).
Molwitz, I. et al. Skeletal muscle fat quantification by dual-energy computed tomography in comparison with 3T MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07820-1 (2021).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9(7), 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).
Gomez-Perez, S., McKeever, L. & Sheean, P. Tutorial: A step-by-step guide (version 2.0) for measuring abdominal circumference and skeletal muscle from a single cross-sectional computed-tomography image using the National Institutes of Health ImageJ. JPEN 44, 419–424 (2020).
Rollins, K. E., Gopinath, A., Awwad, A., Macdonald, I. A. & Lobo, D. N. Computed tomography-based psoas skeletal muscle area and radiodensity are poor sentinels for whole L3 skeletal muscle values. Clin. Nutr. 39, 2227–2232 (2020).
WHO. World Health Organization’s Obesity Classification. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed January 1st 2021.
van der Werf, A. et al. Percentiles for skeletal muscle index, area and radiation attenuation based on computed tomography imaging in a healthy Caucasian population. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 72, 288–296 (2018).
Prado, C. M. et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: A population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 9, 629–635 (2008).
Martin, L. et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: Skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1539–1547 (2013).
Zhang, Y. et al. Post hoc power analysis: Is it an informative and meaningful analysis?. Gen. Psychiatry 32, e100069 (2019).
Yip, C. et al. Imaging body composition in cancer patients: Visceral obesity, sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity may impact on clinical outcome. Insights Imaging 6, 489–497 (2015).
Thompson, D. L. et al. Effects of hydration and dehydration on body composition analysis: A comparative study of bioelectric impedance analysis and hydrodensitometry. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 31, 565–570 (1991).
Abbass, T., Dolan, R. D., Laird, B. J. & McMillan, D. C. The relationship between imaging-based body composition analysis and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with cancer: A systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 11, 1304 (2019).
Lee, K. et al. Recent issues on body composition imaging for sarcopenia evaluation. Korean J. Radiol. 20, 205–217 (2019).
Poltronieri, T. S., de Paula, N. S. & Chaves, G. V. Assessing skeletal muscle radiodensity by computed tomography: An integrative review of the applied methodologies. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 40, 207–223 (2020).
Shen, W. et al. Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: Estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J. Appl. Physiol. 97, 2333–2338 (2004).
Schweitzer, L. et al. What is the best reference site for a single MRI slice to assess whole-body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes in healthy adults?. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102, 58–65 (2015).
Nishimura, J. M. et al. Computed tomography-assessed skeletal muscle mass as a predictor of outcomes in lung cancer surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 108, 1555–1564 (2019).
Troschel, A. S. et al. Computed tomography-based body composition analysis and its role in lung cancer care. J. Thorac. Imaging 35, 91–100 (2020).
Gronberg, B. H. et al. A comparison of CT based measures of skeletal muscle mass and density from the Th4 and L3 levels in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 1069–1076 (2019).
Iannuzzi-Sucich, M., Prestwood, K. M. & Kenny, A. M. Prevalence of sarcopenia and predictors of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men and women. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 57, M772-777 (2002).
Du, Y. et al. Sex differences in the prevalence and adverse outcomes of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in community dwelling elderly in East China using the AWGS criteria. BMC Endocr. Disord. 19, 109 (2019).
Sreepriya, P. R. et al. Prevalence and associated factors of sarcopenia among patients underwent abdominal CT scan in Tertiary Care Hospital of South India. J. Frailty Sarcopenia Falls 5, 79–85 (2020).
Patel, H. P. et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older people in the UK using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition: Findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS). Age Ageing 42, 378–384 (2013).
Dufour, A. B., Hannan, M. T., Murabito, J. M., Kiel, D. P. & McLean, R. R. Sarcopenia definitions considering body size and fat mass are associated with mobility limitations: The Framingham Study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 68, 168–174 (2013).
Marsh, A. P. et al. Muscle strength and BMI as predictors of major mobility disability in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders pilot (LIFE-P). J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 66, 1376–1383 (2011).
Takahashi, N. et al. Validation study of a new semi-automated software program for CT body composition analysis. Abdom. Radiol. (NY) 42, 2369–2375 (2017).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.M.: data curation, data interpretation, visualization, manuscript original draft, manuscript revision; A.K.O.: formal analysis, manuscript revision; L.G.: data curation, manuscript revision; A.U.: data curation, manuscript revision; D.K.: visualization, manuscript revision; I.R.: data curation, manuscript revision; M.L.: visualization, manuscript revision; G.A.: resources, manuscript revision; J.Y.: conceptualization, methodology, manuscript revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Molwitz, I., Ozga, A.K., Gerdes, L. et al. Prediction of abdominal CT body composition parameters by thoracic measurements as a new approach to detect sarcopenia in a COVID-19 cohort. Sci Rep 12, 6443 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10266-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10266-0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor influences body composition in adults with cystic fibrosis: a fully automated CT-based analysis
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Routinecomputertomographie zur Analyse der Körperzusammensetzung – Erfahrungen bei Intensivpatient:innen
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (2023)
-
Abdominal adipose tissue distribution assessed by computed tomography and mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
Endocrine (2023)