Abstract
A major reason for treatment failure of cancer is acquisition of drug resistance. The specific mechanisms underlying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) chemoresistance need to be fully elucidated. lncRNAs involve in drug resistance in some cancers, however, the exact functions of lncRNA colon cancer-associated transcript 1 (CCAT1) in oxaliplatin resistance in HCC are still unknown. Our study indicated that CCAT1 promoted HCC proliferation and reduced the apoptosis induced by oxaliplatin. Knockout of CCAT1 could increased chemosensitivity in vitro and in vivo. Further study found that QKI-5 was an important mediator and blocking of QKI-5/p38 MAPK signaling pathway could enhance oxaliplatin sensitivity. In conclusions, CCAT1 promoted proliferation and oxaliplatin resistance via QKI-5/p38 MAPK signaling pathway in HCC. Targeting CCAT1 in combination with chemotherapeutics may be a promising alternative to reverse drug resistance in HCC treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As the fourth most fatal cancer worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a major global health problem1. The high mortality is due to late diagnosis with metastasis or poor hepatic reserve. The prognosis of HCC patients, especially those at advanced stages, remains poor. The treatment options, mainly containing targeted therapy and systemic chemotherapy, are limited. Targeted drugs represented by sorafenib, which are clinically approved for the advanced or metastatic HCC, extend survival by very few months2,3.
Due to drug costs and availability of targeted drugs, chemotheraputic drugs, especially oxaliplatin, are still adjudged to be effective in a selected population of patients with advanced HCC4. However, a major reason for treatment failure is HCC intrinsic or acquired drug resistance. Common mechanisms include drug efflux pumping, enhanced DNA damage repair capacity, inactivation of cell apoptosis and so on5,6. And yet, the specific mechanisms underlying oxalipatin resistance need to be fully elucidated.
By influencing gene expression at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional levels, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), especially long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), were found to be involved in many biological processes, including proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy and metastasis7,8. Besides serving as biomarkers of diagnosis in many cancers, lncRNAs involve in drug resistance in multiple types of cancer9. Dysregulation of lncRNAs have been reported to be associated with drug resistance and radioresistance. LncRNA HULC was aberrantly expressed in HCC and significantly connected with oxaliplatin, 5-FU and pirarubicin sensitivity through USP22/Sirt1/autophagy pathway10. LncARSR was found to promote doxorubicin resistance via modulating PTEN-PI3K/Akt pathway11. lncRNA HANR contributed to the development of HCC and enhanced chemosensitivity to doxorubicin by binding to GSKIP12.
Colon cancer-associated transcript 1 (CCAT1), located in 8q24.21, is a commonly amplified genomic area in colorectal cancer. Abnormally expressed CCAT1 was associated with aggressive malignancies in multiple types of cancer, including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, squamous cell carcinomas and HCC13,14,15,16. More importantly, CCAT1 was also regarded as a biomarker for drug resistance in some cancers. It was found that CCAT1 was involved in cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and paclitaxel resistance17,18,19. However, little is known about the exact functions of CCAT1 in oxaliplatin resistance in HCC. In this study, we identified the possibility that CCAT1 enhanced oxaliplatin resistance and investigated the underlying mechanisms. We found that CCAT1 effectively reduced the chemosensitivity of oxaliplatin in HCC through quaking (QKI)-5/p38 MAPK signaling pathway, providing a new avenue for HCC therapy.
Methods
Cell lines and transfection
HCC cell lines HCCLM3 and HepG2 were got from Procell Life Science&Technology Co.,Ltd (Wuhan, China) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Grand Island, NY) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a cell incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. pcDNA-CCAT1 plasmid or empty vector was transfected into HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells by Lipofectamine™ 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) reagent following the manufacturer's protocol. Knocked out CCAT1 in the above cells by CRISPR-CAS9. CRISPR guide RNA specifically targeting CCAT1 sequence (forward gRNA GCCCCTGGCCAACTATATCT; reverse gRNA ATTTGGTCATAATGCGGAAA) was constructed by Genechem (Shanghai, China) and transfected into the above cells.
qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted and reversely transcribed into cDNA using the Reverse Transcription System Kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). The levels of RNA expression were quantified by qRT-PCR assay (TaKaRa) and calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method. The values were normalized to an endogenous control GAPDH.
Chemosensitivity detection
The HCC cells were plated in 96-well plates and exposed to the chemotherapeutic agent of oxaliplatin at the final concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000 μM for 48 h. Viable cells were determined by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cell survival rates and the dose-dependent curves of oxaliplatin were plotted, 50% growth inhibition (IC50) values were calculated and analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5.0.
Apoptosis assay
The assay was conducted by using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) according to the protocol. Briefly, the treated cells were prepared and incubated with 5 μL Annexin V-FITC and 5 μL PI for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. The cell apoptosis was performed on a Canto II flow cytometry machine (BD Biosciences) within one hour.
Colony formation assays
The treated HCC cells were seeded into 60 mm dishes with a density of 500 cells/dish and incubated for two weeks. Then the colonies were fixed with ice-cold methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The numbers of colonies containing more than 50 cells were calculated.
Immunofluorescence (IF) staining
The treated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin and incubated with the primary antibodies against active Caspase3 or QKI-5 at 4 °C overnight. The corresponding Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life technology, Waltham, MA) were added, and the nuclei were counterstained by DAPI.
Detection of caspase-3 and caspase-7 activities
Oxaliplatin-treated cells were plated in 96-well opaque white plate. Caspase 3/7 activities were determined by Caspase-Glo® 3/7 Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The blank control, negative control and treated groups were added into 100ul reaction system respectively and cultured for 2 h to being detected the fluorescence value on Promega Glomax.
Western blot
The protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). After being blocked with 5% skim milk in tris buffered saline (TBS)-Tween 20, the blots were cut prior to hybridisation with primary antibodies, which are listed in Table S1, followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Proteintech, Wuhan, China). The immunoblots were visualized by employing the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Millipore) on a gel imaging analysis system (Tanon, Shanghai, China).
Cell fractionation assay
HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells were harvested and incubated with a lysis solution. After being centrifuged, the supernatant was used for assessing the cytoplasmic RNA, and the pellet was used for nuclear RNA extraction. GAPDH and U6 were used as cytosolic and nuclear markers respectively.
In vivo xenograft studies
Twenty BALB/c male mice weighing 18–20 g and aged 4–6 weeks were used (both from Experimental Animal Center of Shandong University, China). All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Use Committee of Jining Medical Universit. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The mice were injected with HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells with CCAT1 knock out and received intraperitoneal injections of oxaliplatin (0.8 mg/kg/w). The tumor growth curves were monitored and the final tumor sizes were calculated using the following formula: V(mm3) = (L × W2) × 0.5 (L: Tumor length, W: Width).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a TdT-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (Tunel) assay
Apoptosis-related proteins (Bcl-2 and Active Caspase-3) were detected in subcutaneous tumor tissues by IHC assay. After deparaffinization, rehydration and antigen retrieval, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by the corresponding secondary antibodies. Tunel assay was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions to detect the apoptosis of HCC cells in subcutaneously xenograft tumors.
RNA pulldown assay
Briefly, cells were lysated and incubated with biotin (Bio)-labeled oligonucleotide probes. The beads were washed and boiled in SDS sample buffer, and the retrieved protein was was validated by standard Western blot analysis.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with the GraphPad Prism Software (La Jolla, CA, USA). Student’s t test was used to analyze differences between two groups, and two-way ANOVA was applied when more than two groups were compared. p-values < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
CCAT1 modulated sensitivity of HCC cells to oxaliplatin
We observed that CCAT1 expreesion was significantly higher in oxaliplatin treated cells of HCCLM3 and HepG2 than their parental cells (p < 0.01, Fig. 1A). To explore the association between CCAT1 and oxaliplatin sensitivity, we knocked out CCAT1 expressions in HCCLM3 and HepG2 by CRISPR-Cas9. Subsequently, these HCC cell lines with different CCAT1 expression levels were exposed to increased concentrations of oxaliplatin from 0.1 to 1 mM for 48 h to determine the cell viabilities and the IC50 values of oxaliplatin. The results indicated that, compared to the negative control group, knockout of CCAT1 in HCCLM3 showed greater oxaliplatin sensitivity, with lower IC50 values (IC50: 46.56 vs. 23.22 μM, p < 0.01, Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1C, HepG2 cells exhibited the same trend (IC50: 27.98 vs. 13.28 μM, p < 0.01). The results suggested that there might be a correlation between CCAT1 and oxaliplatin sensitivity in HCC. Then we explored the proliferation and apoptosis of HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells influenced by CCAT1. The colony formation assay demonstrated that CCAT1 knockout could attenuate the numbers of colonies in these two cells, compared to the control groups (p < 0.01, respectively. Figure 1D). The flow cytometry showed that knockout of CCAT1 significantly increased the apoptosis of HCC cells, especially in HepG2 treated by oxaliplatin (p < 0.001, Fig. 1E). Further, caspase-3 activation in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells were tested in presence of oxaliplatin at their respective IC50 concentrations. As shown in Fig. 1F, the cells with CCAT1 knockout exhibited higher caspase-3 activation levels (p < 0.01). Caspase-Glo® 3/7 assay indicated that caspase-3 and caspase-7 activities were significantly increased when CCAT1 was knocked out, as compared with the control groups both in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 1G).
CCAT1 involved in HCC resistance to oxaliplatin in vivo
To further explore the effects of CCAT1 on HCC chemotherapy in vivo, the stably knocked-out CCAT1 (KO-CCAT1) HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells were used to construct the implantation model. The results indicated that the tumors in CCAT1 knockout groups grew at a significantly slower rate than those in the control groups both in HCCLM3 and HepG2. Five weeks after subcutaneous implantation, the average tumor volume in the KO-CCAT1 groups were significantly smaller than the control groups (0.38 ± 0.05 cm3 vs. 0.96 ± 0.17 cm3; 0.20 ± 0.05 cm3 vs. 0.40 ± 0.06 cm3, p < 0.05, Fig. 2A,B). Tumor cell apoptosis in the subcutaneous tumors tissue was detected by TUNEL staining. As shown in Fig. 2C, apoptotic cells were significantly increased when CCAT1 was knocked out. The apoptotic rates of HCCLM3 cells in the groups of control and KO-CCAT1 were 4.53 ± 0.67% and 12.30 ± 0.59% (p < 0.001) and in the HepG2 cells were 5.73 ± 0.58% and 9.00 ± 0.79% respectively (p < 0.05). IHC of tumors tissue was applied to check the expression of apoptosis-related proteins. Higher active caspase-3 and lower Bcl-2 expression levels were observed when CCAT1 was knocked out both in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 2D).
CCAT1 interacted with QKI-5
The subcellular localization of lncRNAs holds valuable clues to their molecular function. CCAT1 is exclusively positioned in the nucleus20. Through bioinformatic database of lncATLAS (https://lncatlas.crg.eu/), CCAT1 was observed to be located in nucleus in HepG2 cells (Fig. 3A). We then verified the subcellular localization of CCAT1 by cytoplasmic & cuclear RNA purification (Fig. 3B). LncRNAs could exert their functions through RNA-interacting proteins. Through bioinformatic analysis (http://rbpdb.ccbr.utoronto.ca/), we dentified a set of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) targeted by CCAT1, including QKI (Fig. 3C). As the major isoform of QKIs, QKI-5 was found to be enriched in the nuclei of HCC cells by immunostaining assay, which was consistent with the localization of CCAT1 (Fig. 3D). Further studies were performed to investigate the relationship between CCAT1 and QKI-5, and the results from RIP assay showed the enrichment of CCAT1 in the QKI-5-immunoprecipitation. RNA pull-down assay also confirmed the interaction between CCAT1 and QKI-5 (Fig. 3E).
Overexpression of QKI-5 reversed oxaliplatin resistance via inhibiting the p38 MAPK signaling pathway
It is suggested that QKI regulates genes expression through interaction with the quaking response element (QRE). Among the target genes containing at least one QRE, Ras, a member of MAPK signaling pathway, might involve in the regulation21. To investigate the major pathway modulated by QKI-5, we upregulated QKI-5 by pcDNA 3.1 plasmid in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells and detected the expression of JNK, ERK1/2 and p38 by western blotting. The results indicated that the phosphorylation level of p38 MAPK was increased when QKI-5 was overexpressed (Fig. 4A). We found that CCAT1 inhibited the phosphorylation level of p38, while up-regulated QKI-5 could increase p38 phosphorylation level inhibited by CCAT1 (Fig. 4B). Oxaliplatin sensitivity influenced by QKI-5 was explored further. Compared with the control group, CCAT1 dramatically decreased the drug sensitivity, while upregulated QKI-5 could reincrease oxaliplatin sensitivity, with lower IC50 values (IC50 values of HCCLM3: NC: 46.04 ± 1.10 μM, CCAT1: 62.08 ± 2.36 μM, CCAT1 + pcDNA.3.1-NC: 63.31 ± 1.39 μM, CCAT1 + pcDNA3.1-QKI-5: 46.89 ± 2.95 μM; IC50 values of HepG2: NC: 27.49 ± 1.40 μM, CCAT1: 38.768 ± 0.90 μM, CCAT1 + Control: 36.29 ± 1.13 μM, CCAT1 + pcDNA3.1-QKI-5: 27.97 ± 0.85 μM, p < 0.01, Fig. 4C). The colony formation assay demonstrated that CCAT1 increased the numbers of colonies, which could be inhibited by up-regulated of QKI-5 (Fig. 4D). This suggests that the simultaneous up-regulated of QKI-5 at least in part revert the effect of CCAT1. Furtherly, cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-QKI-5 exhibited higher caspase-3 activation levels (p < 0.01, Fig. 4E,F). These results demonstrate that CCAT1 promoted proliferation and oxaliplatin resistance by QKI-5/p38 MAPK signaling pathway.
Discussion
Drug resistance is often been activated at the same time when oxaliplatin exerts anti-growth effects. A series of lncRNAs play important roles in chemoresistance and tumor progression. The roles and mechanisms of lncRNAs in drug resistance are complicated. Enhanced drug efflux caused by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters is an important contributor of drug resistance. Up-regulated lncRNA NR2F1-AS1 confers HCC resistance to oxaliplatin by targeting ABCC122. Upregulation of lncRNAs VLDLR and H19 are related with drug sensitivity by inducing the expression of ABCG2 and MDR123,24. The increased ability of DNA damage repair helps cancer cells bypassing the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy drugs. Therefore, the lncRNAs, which involve in genomic stability can modulate drug sensitivity25. There are very few researches about CCAT1 and platinum-based chemotherapy. Hu et al.26 demonstrated that CCAT1 contributed to DDP resistance by targeting miR-130a-3p/SOX4. Another study suggested that CCAT1 promoted cisplatin-induced apoptosis via CCAT1/miR-454/survivin axis27.
120 different lncRNA expression profile in oxaliplatin-resistant HCC cells was identified by microarray28. In our study, oxaliplatin resistance induced by CCAT1 in HCC is clarified for the first time. We found that CCAT1 was significantly up-regulated in oxaliplatin-resistant HCC cells. Knockdown of CCAT1 significantly increased the apoptosis of HCC cells and enhanced sensitivity to oxaliplatin and further study demonstrated the role of QKI-5 in this process.
Various factors, including ncRNAs, could regulate QKI. QKIs is a member of the RBPs, including QKI5, QKI6, and QKI7. Through binding with QRE, QKI regulates mRNA stability, RNA transportation and translation. As a major isoform of QKIs, QKI-5 has a nuclear localization signal and is reported to be a tumour suppressor in many cancers29,30.
Researches indicate that depletion of QKI‐5 increases cell proliferation and metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and HCC29,31,32,33. What’s more, QKI might involve in drug sensitivity. Some studies showed that overexpression of QKI-5 could attenuate the toxicity of doxorubicin by regulating circular RNAs34,35. Yu et al.36 demonstrated that 5-FU increased FOXO1 expression via inhibition of QKI in the oncogenesis of breast carcinoma. However, the roles of QKI in oxaliplatin resistance remain to be fully elucidated.
OXA treatment form platinum–DNA adducts, which can’t be repaired by mismatch repair (MMR) system. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the main DNA damage repair pathway. In NER, the most important mediums are excision repair cross complementary 1 (ERCC1) and its catalytic companion XPF (ERCC4). Bioinformatic analysis by star Base indicates that QKI and ERCC1 have binding sites, and ERCC1 might be the target gene of QKI. So we speculate that CCAT1/QKI/ERCC1 might play import role in DNA damage and oxaliplatin resistance, which need to be verified in our future work.
Conclusions
In our investigation, we have established a signaling cascade of CCAT1 and QKI-5 in the regulation of HCC cell proliferation and chemoresistance. Targeting lncRNAs in combination with chemotherapeutics may be a promising alternative to reverse drug resistance in cancer treatment.
References
Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
Shen, Y. C. et al. Clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Liver Cancer. 2, 345–364 (2013).
Mazzanti, R., Arena, U. & Tassi, R. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we?. World J. Exp. Med. 6, 21–36 (2016).
Kalyan, A., Nimeiri, H. & Kulik, L. Systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: current and promising. Clin. Liver Dis. 19, 421–432 (2015).
Salehan, M. R. & Morse, H. R. DNA damage repair and tolerance: a role in chemotherapeutic drug resistance. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 70, 31–40 (2013).
Butler, E. B., Zhao, Y., Munoz-Pinedo, C., Lu, J. & Tan, M. Stalling the engine of resistance: targeting cancer metabolism to overcome therapeutic resistance. Cancer Res. 73, 2709–2717 (2013).
Frankel, L. B., Lubas, M. & Lund, A. H. Emerging connections between RNA and autophagy. Autophagy 13, 3–23 (2017).
Chi, Y., Wang, D., Wang, J., Yu, W. & Yang, J. Long non-coding RNA in the pathogenesis of cancers. Cells-Basel. 8, 416–420 (2019).
Wei, L. et al. The emerging role of microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs in drug resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer. 18, 147 (2019).
Xiong, H. et al. LncRNA HULC triggers autophagy via stabilizing Sirt1 and attenuates the chemosensitivity of HCC cells. Oncogene 36, 3528–3540 (2017).
Li, Y., Ye, Y., Feng, B. & Qi, Y. Long noncoding RNA lncARSR promotes doxorubicin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma via modulating PTEN-PI3K/Akt pathway. J. Cell Biochem. 118, 4498–4507 (2017).
Xiao, J. et al. LncRNA HANR promotes tumorigenesis and increase of chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 43, 1926–1938 (2017).
Abedini, P. et al. Expression analysis of circulating plasma long noncoding RNAs in colorectal cancer: The relevance of lncRNAs ATB and CCAT1 as potential clinical hallmarks. J. Cell Physiol. 234, 22028–22033 (2019).
Zhang, X. F., Liu, T., Li, Y. & Li, S. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA CCAT1 is a novel biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8, 9440–9445 (2015).
Jiang, Y. et al. Co-activation of super-enhancer-driven CCAT1 by TP63 and SOX2 promotes squamous cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 9, 3619 (2018).
Deng, L., Yang, S. B., Xu, F. F. & Zhang, J. H. Long noncoding RNA CCAT1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by functioning as let-7 sponge. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 34, 18 (2015).
Hu, M. et al. lncRNA CCAT1 is a biomarker for the proliferation and drug resistance of esophageal cancer via the miR-143/PLK1/BUBR1 axis. Mol. Carcinog. 58, 2207–2217 (2019).
Yang, C., Pan, Y. & Deng, S. P. Downregulation of lncRNA CCAT1 enhances 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in human colon cancer cells. BMC Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 9 (2019).
Wang, Q., Zhang, W. & Hao, S. LncRNA CCAT1 modulates the sensitivity of paclitaxel in nasopharynx cancers cells via miR-181a/CPEB2 axis. Cell Cycle 16, 795–801 (2017).
Wang, N. et al. Pivotal prognostic and diagnostic role of the long noncoding RNA colon cancerassociated transcript 1 expression in human cancer (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 19, 771–782 (2019).
Li, K. et al. A long noncoding RNA binding to QKI-5 regulates germ cell apoptosis via p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 10, 699 (2019).
Huang, H. et al. LncRNA NR2F1-AS1 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma oxaliplatin resistance by targeting ABCC1 via miR-363. J. Cell Mol. Med. 22, 3238–3245 (2018).
Takahashi, K., Yan, I. K., Wood, J., Haga, H. & Patel, T. Involvement of extracellular vesicle long noncoding RNA (linc-VLDLR) in tumor cell responses to chemotherapy. Mol. Cancer Res. 12, 1377–1387 (2014).
Tsang, W. P. & Kwok, T. T. Riboregulator H19 induction of MDR1-associated drug resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncogene 26, 4877–4881 (2007).
Renganathan, A. & Felley-Bosco, E. Long noncoding RNAs in cancer and therapeutic potential. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1008, 199–222 (2017).
Hu, B. et al. LncRNA CCAT1/miR-130a-3p axis increases cisplatin resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer cell line by targeting SOX4. Cancer Biol. Ther. 18, 974–983 (2017).
Wang, D. Y., Li, N. & Cui, Y. L. Long non-coding RNA CCAT1 sponges miR-454 to promote chemoresistance of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by regulation of surviving. Cancer Res. Treat. 52, 798–814 (2020).
Yin, X. et al. Identification of long noncoding RNA expression profile in oxaliplatin-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Gene 596, 53–88 (2017).
Fu, X. & Feng, Y. QKI-5 suppresses cyclin D1 expression and proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells via MAPK signalling pathway. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 44, 562–567 (2015).
Zhao, Y. et al. The tumor suppressing effects of QKI-5 in prostate cancer: a novel diagnostic and prognostic protein. Cancer Biol. Ther. 15, 108–118 (2014).
Liang, G. et al. miR-196b-5p-mediated downregulation of TSPAN12 and GATA6 promotes tumor progression in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4347–4357 (2020).
Zhang, R. L. et al. RNA-binding protein QKI-5 inhibits the proliferation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via post-transcriptional stabilization of RASA1 mRNA. Cell Cycle 15, 3094–3104 (2016).
Han, J. et al. YY1 complex promotes quaking expression via super-enhancer binding during EMT of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 79, 1451–1464 (2019).
Gupta, S. K. et al. Quaking inhibits doxorubicin-mediated cardiotoxicity through regulation of cardiac circular RNA expression. Circ. Res. 122, 246–254 (2018).
Yan, F. et al. Salidroside attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiac dysfunction partially through activation of QKI/FoxO1 pathway. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 14, 355–364 (2020).
Yu, F. et al. Post-transcriptional repression of FOXO1 by QKI results in low levels of FOXO1 expression in breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 31, 1459–1465 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81802467) and Nature Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2018LH014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.X. contributed to interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. Y.S. and Y.Y. contributed to acquisition of data. J.M. contributed to technical support. J.S. contributed to study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xia, C., Sun, Y., Li, Y. et al. LncRNA CCAT1 enhances chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting QKI-5. Sci Rep 12, 7826 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11644-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11644-4
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The interplay between noncoding RNAs and drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma: the big impact of little things
Journal of Translational Medicine (2023)
-
Deciphering STAT3 signaling potential in hepatocellular carcinoma: tumorigenesis, treatment resistance, and pharmacological significance
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters (2023)