Abstract
Metamorphopsia is an important visual symptom of macular disease. We determined predictors for metamorphopsia investigating the relationships of macular hole (MH) diameter and retinal layer thicknesses with metamorphopsia after MH surgery. Forty-two eyes of 42 consecutive patients undergoing MH surgery were retrospectively studied. Metamorphopsia was measured with M-CHARTS. Inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer retinal layer (OR) thicknesses were measured 1000 μm away from central fovea at using Spectralis. Preoperative M-CHARTS scores correlated with MH diameters (P = 0.007–0.031) and changes of temporal OR thickness (P = 0.008–0.010). Postoperative M-CHARTS score at 3 months correlated with preoperative nasal and inferior OR thicknesses (P = 0.003 and 0.016) and with changes of superior INL at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.011 and 0.025), and score at 1 month with change of temporal OR at 6 months (P = 0.033). Postoperative improvement of M-CHARTS scores correlated with changes of temporal INL and superior OR (P = 0.026 and 0.002). Multiple regression analysis revealed that MH diameter was a significant predictor for metamorphopsia. Photoreceptor displacement and inner retinal change may generate metamorphopsia in MH undergoing surgery, however MH diameter is the most powerful predictor.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Metamorphopsia is an important visual symptom of macular disease. Patients with macular hole (MH) complain of metamorphopsia before and after surgery. Anatomic closure rates and functional outcomes of MH have improved with advances in surgical techniques, including techniques for manipulation of the internal limiting membrane (ILM)1,2,3. Even after successful MH surgery residual metamorphopsia affects the patients’ daily life4.
Metamorphopsia before and after MH surgery was quantified using M-CHARTS5, and parameters of optical coherence tomography (OCT) have been related with metamorphopsia scores6,7,8,9. However, the exact mechanism of metamorphopsia in MH is not clear.
Earlier, we reported that ILM peeling in MH surgery made the flexible retina retract toward the optic disc, and that retinal displacement of temporal retinal vessels after surgery correlated with basal diameter of MH10. Total retinal thickness after MH surgery decreased in all sectors except for the nasal11, and retinal displacement correlated with the change of inner nuclear layer (INL) thickness12, which indirectly supporting our hypothesis that retinal displacement was caused by the contraction of optic nerve fibers10,11,12. Photoreceptor layers move to close MH and inner retina shrinks toward the optic disc possibly due to contraction of optic nerve fibers. Therefore, dynamic changes of retinal structure occur during the closure of MH.
As a first step toward understanding the mechanism of metamorphopsia in MH, we analyzed the relationships of metamorphopsia scores with retinal structural parameters including MH diameters, distances of retinal displacement, and retinal layer thicknesses.
Methods
This was a retrospective, consecutive, case series study. Patients’ selection, ophthalmic examination, and surgical procedures were previously reported in detail12. Briefly, patients who were able to follow up at least 6 months postoperatively were included in this study. All patients underwent examinations at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Eyes with an axial length of 27 mm or longer, a history of retinal surgery and ocular diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, uveitis or ocular trauma, and those undergoing inverted ILM flap technique were excluded.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Teikyo University School of Medicine (No.20–206) and conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, need to obtain informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Teikyo University School of Medicine.
Three vitreoretinal surgeons (M.I., Y.I. and A.T.) performed MH surgeries from March 2017 to July 2020 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, University Hospital Mizonokuchi (Kanagawa, JAPAN). All patients underwent a standard 3-port PPV with 25-gauge instruments and combined ILM peeling using the 0.25 mg/ml brilliant blue G (BBG) or 10 mg/ml triamcinolone acetonide (TA). The ILM peeling was performed in all quadrants, to the edge of the vascular arcade and close to the optic nerve papillary margin for the nasal part. After air-fluid exchange, intravitreal air was replaced with 20% sulfur hexafluoride. Details of surgical procedures were reported previously12.
The basal and minimum MH diameters in the vertical and horizontal directions, retinal thickness and retinal distance were manually measured with spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) images using caliper function. The methods of selecting sectors and measuring retinal thickness with Spectralis OCT images were described previously12. We measured each retinal layer 1000 μm away from the center of the fovea in four sections of macular: the nasal, temporal, superior and inferior quadrants in order to get rid of cystic change around the fovea as reported previously13. INL thickness and outer retinal layer (OR) thickness in each sector were measured manually using the caliper function of Spectralis OCT. Similar to our previous report12, the distance between the temporal margin of the optic disc and an intersection or bifurcation of retinal vessels was manually measured in four sectors on near-infrared images, and the rates of change in retinal distance after surgery was used for statistical analysis as retinal displacement (%). Measurement of the MH diameters, retinal distance and retinal thickness are shown in Fig. 1. The retinal thicknesses and retinal displacements (%) in four sectors were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using a Landolt C chart at each visit and was converted to the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) units for statistical analyses. M-CHARTS (Inami Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used to quantify the degree of metamorphopsia for both vertical and horizontal lines. The detailed procedure for M-CHARTS scoring is described in our previous reports14. The BCVA and M-CHARTS scores were measured at each visit.
Normality of the data was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and a nonparametric test was selected because the data did not follow a normal distribution. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate comparisons between preoperative and postoperative M-CHARTS scores. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test was used to determine correlations between M-CHARTS score and MH diameter, retinal displacement (%) and changes of retinal thickness. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify independent parameters associated with metamorphopsia. Statistical analyses were analyzed with SPSS software version 24.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). A difference was considered to be statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Results
Forty-two eyes of 42 patients (20 women) were studied (aged 66.6 ± 5.8 years [mean ± standard deviation]; age range 51–78 years). Fourteen eyes (33.3%) were classified as Stage 2 MH, 18 eyes (42.9%) as Stage 3, and 10 eyes (23.8%) as Stage 4.
Forty-one phakic eyes were performed phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation simultaneously with vitrectomy. During ILM peeling, BBG was used for 28 eyes and TA for 14 eyes. MHs were closed in all the eyes after initial surgery.
The average horizontal minimum MH diameter was 273.9 ± 111.6 μm (range 106–584 μm) and the vertical minimum MH diameter was 233.7 ± 102.3 μm (range 51–513 μm), whereas the average horizontal basal MH diameter was 670.3 ± 235.9 μm (range 109–1108 μm) and the vertical basal MH diameter was 582.6 ± 224.3 μm (range 109–983 μm).
The BCVA was 0.57 ± 0.28 logMAR units preoperatively, 0.22 ± 0.19 logMAR units at 1 month, 0.13 ± 0.17 logMAR units at 3 months, 0.11 ± 0.17 logMAR units at 6 months postoperatively. The average BCVA improved gradually and significantly for 6 months postoperatively (P value range: P < 0.001–0.017).
The preoperative BCVA did not correlate with the vertical and horizontal M-CHARTS scores (P = 0.529 and 0.417). The BCVA was significantly correlated with the vertical M-CHARTS score at 1 month postoperatively (r = 0.340, P = 0.030), but not at the other visits.
Time course of average M-CHARTS scores
The average preoperative vertical M-CHARTS score was 0.89 ± 0.56, and improved to 0.53 ± 0.42 at 1 month, 0.51 ± 0.43 at 3 months and 0.49 ± 0.45 at 6 months (all P < 0.001). The average preoperative horizontal M-CHARTS score was 0.61 ± 0.39, which improved to 0.36 ± 0.41 at 1 month (P < 0.001), 0.33 ± 0.29 at 3 months (P < 0.001) and 0.38 ± 0.39 at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.007).
Correlations of vertical and horizontal M-CHARTS scores with the size of macular hole
Correlations of pre- and postoperative M-CHARTS scores with horizontal and vertical MH diameters are shown in Table 1. The preoperative horizontal and vertical M-CHARTS scores showed significant correlations with the horizontal minimum, horizontal basal, and vertical basal MH diameters. The horizontal and vertical M-CHARTS scores at 3 months correlated with the vertical and horizontal basal MH diameters (r and P value range: r = 0.394–0.401, P = 0.009–0.010), and the horizontal M-CHARTS score at 6 months correlated with the horizontal minimum MH diameter (r = 0.309, P = 0.049). The horizontal and vertical M-CHARTS scores at 1 month did not correlate with any of MH diameters.
Correlations of M-CHARTS scores with retinal displacement
Preoperative vertical and horizontal M-CHARTS scores did not correlate with the retinal displacement (%) in any of four sections, and postoperative M-CHARTS scores did not correlate with the retinal displacement (%) at any visits (all P values > 0.05).
Correlations of M-CHARTS scores with pre- and postoperative changes in inner nuclear layer and outer retinal layer thicknesses
Correlations between M-CHARTS scores and preoperative INL and OR thickness are shown in Table 2. Preoperative M-CHARTS score showed a positive correlation with preoperative temporal OR thickness. Postoperative M-CHARTS scores correlated with preoperative nasal, temporal and inferior OR thicknesses.
Correlations between M-CHARTS scores and the rates of change in INL and OR thickness are shown in Table 3. Preoperative M-CHARTS score did not correlate with the rate of change in INL thickness at any visits. There were significant correlations between preoperative M-CHARTS scores and the rates of change in temporal OR thicknesses at all postoperative visits. Postoperative vertical M-CHARTS score at 1 month correlated with the change of superior INL thickness at 1 month and that of temporal OR thickness at 3 and 6 months, and vertical M-CHARTS score at 3 months with that of superior INL at 3 months, indicating that both inner and outer retinal structural changes after MH closure may affect postoperative metamorphopsia.
Correlation between pre- and postoperative M-CHARTS score differences and changes in inner nuclear layer and outer retinal layer thickness
The correlations between the pre- and postoperative differences in M-CHARTS score and the rates of change in retinal thickness at 1 month postoperatively are shown in Fig. 2. The difference in horizontal M-CHARTS score correlated with the rates of change in nasal and temporal INL thickness (r = 0.309, P = 0.049 and r = 0.348, P = 0.026) and the rate of change in superior OR thickness at 1 month postoperatively (r = 0.315, P = 0.045), and the difference in vertical M-CHARTS score correlated with the rate of change in superior OR thickness at 1 month postoperatively (r = 0.460, P = 0.002).
The difference in horizontal M-CHARTS score at 6 months correlated with the rate of change in superior OR thickness at 3 months postoperatively (r = 0.315, P = 0.042), and the difference in vertical M-CHARTS at 6 months correlated with the rate of change in temporal OR thickness at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (r = 0.304, P = 0.050 and r = 0.369, P = 0.016).
Thus, the greater the postoperative change of INL and OR thickness, the greater the improvement of metamorphopsia after MH surgery.
Correlations of basal macular hole diameters with preoperative inner nuclear layer and outer retinal layer thicknesses
The average INL thickness in each of the four sections at baseline was positively correlated with the vertical and horizontal basal MH diameters (r and P value range: r = 0.358–0.587, P < 0.001–0.020). The average OR thickness in the nasal and temporal sections at baseline were correlated with the vertical and horizontal basal MH diameters (r and P value range: r = 0.384–0.416, P = 0.006–0.012).
Multivariate analysis to identify predictors of the M-CHARTS score
Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for the M-CHARTS scores at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. The dependent factors were defined as the vertical and horizontal M-CHARTS scores at baseline and 6 months postoperatively, and the independent factors defined as age, sex, rates of change in INL and OR thickness, retinal displacement (%) and basal MH diameter. The rates of change in INL and OR thickness and retinal displacement (%) for the nasal, temporal, superior and inferior sectors were selected respectively. Because vertical and horizontal basal MH diameters were strongly correlated (r = 0.961, P < 0.001, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test), we used horizontal basal MH diameters and vertical basal MH diameters separately in different models. As shown in Tables 4 and 5, larger MH diameter is an only significant predictive factor for the higher M-CHARTS scores at baseline and 6 months postoperatively (P value range: P = 0.007–0.049).
Discussion
Our results showed that metamorphopsia at baseline correlated with the MH diameters and changes in temporal OR thickness. Patients with greater degree of postoperative thinning of the superior INL at 3 and 6 months and temporal OR at 6 months had greater degree of postoperative metamorphopsia. Improvement of the M-CHARTS scores correlated with the rates of changes in INL and OR thickness at 1 month, indicating that the greater the degree of postoperative thinning of the INL and OR thickness, the greater the improvement in postoperative metamorphopsia. Multiple regression analysis showed that MH diameter significantly influenced the pre- and postoperative M-CHARTS scores, and that the MH diameter was the most important factor influencing the MH metamorphopsia. Retinal displacement occurring after MH surgery did not correlate with metamorphopsia.
We have previously reported that the change in INL thickness significantly correlates with retinal displacement after ILM peeling, and the temporal retinal displacement correlates with the basal MH diameter12. The retina moves toward the optic disc during MH closure and we found that distance of retinal displacement correlated with the change in the INL thickness, but not the changes in OR thickness12. Dynamic structural changes of the inner retina occur during MH closure, which appears to generate part of postoperative metamorphopsia after MH surgery.
The mechanism by which retinal deformation causes metamorphopsia has been discussed in previous publications. Asymmetric elongation of the foveal tissue was associated with postoperative metamorphopsia in eyes undergoing MH surgery8. Park et al.9 reported that a large extent of ILM detachment caused the square grid on the retina to move towards the optic nerve and postoperative metamorphopsia corelated with parafoveal deformation. The authors considered that metamorphopsia after MH surgery was caused by irregularities and eccentric displacement of the photoreceptor layer15,16. Sugiura et al.6 reported that the area of the intraretinal cyst was most associated with metamorphopsia. It is interesting that their study did not show a positive association between metamorphopsia and MH diameter. Probably their measurement may have represented dislocation of photoreceptors more than MH diameter among the patients they collected in their study.
Earlier, our team reported that INL is a biomarker of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM)17. Experimental studies showed that Müller cell is an optic fiber which transfers photons to photoreceptors18,19, and we considered that dislocated Müller cells transfer photons to the photoreceptors which located away from original positions, which creates a sensation of metamorphopsia17. After MH surgery, changes in INL thickness correlated with changes in metamorphopsia, suggesting that Müller cells play a role for sensation of metamorphopsia in eyes undergoing MH surgery. A shrinkage of the INL caused by retinal movement in eyes with larger MH appears to create greater postoperative scores of M-CHARTS. However, before MH surgery, MH diameter is an important parameter to determine the degree of metamorphopsia. The preoperative INL and OR thicknesses were influenced by the size of the MH, of which the baseline OR thickness correlated the pre- and postoperative metamorphopsia. Multiple regression analysis showed that the MH diameter is a predictor for the postoperative M-CHARTS score, which indicates that morphological changes in the photoreceptor layer associated with MH has great influence on postoperative metamorphopsia. In contrast, the M-CHARTS score did not correlate with retinal displacement, indicating that the displacement of retina existing relatively far away from the central fovea did not affect metamorphopsia. This means that the displacement of photoreceptor cells near the central fovea during MH closure appears to play the most important role in postoperative metamorphopsia.
The mechanism of metamorphopsia in patients with MH is explained using OCT images and schematic diagrams in Fig. 3. The photoreceptor cells near the center of the macular with the whole retinal layer are efferently displaced during the formation of the MH, detached from the retinal pigment epithelial cells, and elevated toward the vitreous. As a result, the density of photoreceptor cells increases along the optical axis and the overlapping photoreceptor cells are simultaneously stimulated with incoming light, causing metamorphopsia in which percepted images pinch toward the center. Early after MH closure, photoreceptor cells are slightly displaced from their original location, and the sensation of metamorphopsia improves as photoreceptor cells gradually return to their original positions with time.
In contrast, contraction of the ERM causes centripetal displacement of the retinal surface, distorting the alignment of photoreceptor cells and causing metamorphopsia20. In both the MH and the ERM, distorted Müller cells may also contribute to the development of metamorphopsia as optic guides which transfer photons to the displaced photoreceptors as proposed in our previous publications14,17.
The present study had several limitations. First, it was a retrospective study with a relatively small number of cases and a short follow-up period. Second, the area of ILM removal was not measured quantitatively. Third, all the retinal thicknesses were measured manually using OCT images. Because of the retinal displacement after MH surgery, the measurement points for each retinal thickness were not identical throughout observation periods.
In conclusion, basal MH diameter is a significant predictor for metamorphopsia before and after surgery. Displaced photoreceptors appear to contribute most to generate pre- and postoperative metamorphopsia. The change of INL thickness after MH surgery also correlates with postoperative metamorphopsia, which suggests that thinning of inner retinal layer simultaneously play some role for creating a sensation of metamorphopsia.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable requests.
References
Brooks, H. L. Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology 107, 1939–1948 (2000).
Lois, N. et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 1586–1592 (2011).
Michalewska, Z., Michalewski, J., Adelman, R. A. & Nawrocki, J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology 117, 2018–2025 (2010).
Okamoto, F., Okamoto, Y., Fukuda, S., Hiraoka, T. & Oshika, T. Vision-related quality of life and visual function after vitrectomy for various vitreoretinal disorders. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 744–751 (2010).
Matsumoto, C. et al. Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membranes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 4012–4016 (2003).
Sugiura, Y., Okamoto, F., Okamoto, Y., Hiraoka, T. & Oshika, T. Relationship between metamorphopsia and intraretinal cysts within the fluid cuff after surgery for idiopathic macular hole. Retina 37, 70–75 (2017).
Wada, I. et al. Quantifying metamorphopsia with M-CHARTS in patients with idiopathic macular hole. Clin. Ophthalmol. 11, 1719–1726 (2017).
Kim, J. H., Kang, S. W., Park, D. Y., Kim, S. J. & Ha, H. S. Asymmetric elongation of foveal tissue after macular hole surgery and its impact on metamorphopsia. Ophthalmology 119, 2133–2140 (2012).
Park, S. H. et al. Square grid deformation analysis of the macula and postoperative metamorphopsia after macular hole surgery. Retina 41, 931–939 (2021).
Ishida, M. et al. Retinal displacement toward optic disc after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 157, 971–977 (2014).
Imamura, Y. & Ishida, M. Retinal thinning after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 62, 158–162 (2018).
Takeyama, A. et al. Retinal displacement and intraretinal structural changes after idiopathic macular hole surgery. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 66, 173–182 (2022).
Ohta, K., Sato, A. & Fukui, E. Retinal thickness in eyes with idiopathic macular hole after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 251, 1273–1279 (2012).
Ichikawa, Y., Imamura, Y. & Ishida, M. Metamorphopsia and tangenital retinal displacement after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 37, 673–679 (2017).
Krøyer, K., Christensen, U., la Cour, M. & Larsen, M. Metamorphopsia assessment before and after vitrectomy for macular hole. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 5511–5515 (2009).
Saito, Y. et al. The visual performance and metamorphopsia of patients with macular holes. Arch. Ophthalmol. 118, 41–46 (2000).
Ichikawa, Y., Imamura, Y. & Ishida, M. Inner nuclear layer thickness, a biomarker of metamorphopsia in epiretinal membrane, correlates with tangential retinal displacement. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 193, 20–27 (2018).
Franze, K. et al. Müller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 8287–8292 (2007).
Labin, A. M., Safuri, S. K., Ribak, E. N. & Perlman, I. Müller cells separate between wavelengths to improve day vision with minimal effect upon night vision. Nat. Commun. 5, 4319. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5319 (2014).
Ooto, S. et al. High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 118, 873–881 (2011).
Funding
The authors declare that they received no financial support for this study. Each author warrants that he or she has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.I., Y.I. and A.T. contributed to the design of the study. T.F., T.I., M.S., Y.K. and A.T. contributed to data collection, analysis and interpretation. A.T. drafted the manuscript and A.T., Y.I. and M.I. revised it. All authors approved the final version to be submitted for publishing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Takeyama, A., Imamura, Y., Fujimoto, T. et al. Predictors for metamorphopsia in eyes undergoing macular hole surgery. Sci Rep 13, 810 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28031-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28031-2
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Aniseikonia and retinal morphological changes in eyes undergoing macular hole surgery
Scientific Reports (2024)