Abstract
Oral probiotics have been recently gaining much attention owing to their potential to inhibit the progression of dental caries by controlling the cariogenic effects of Streptococcus mutans. We isolated and genotypically identified 77 lactic acid bacteria including 12 Limosilactobacillus fermentum probiotic candidates from the oral cavity of healthy volunteers. Among the 12 L. fermentum isolates, nine isolates effectively inhibited the growth of S. mutans via hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production. The others neither suppressed the growth of S. mutans nor produced H2O2. Eight out of the nine H2O2-producing L. fermentum isolates exhibited strong adherence to oral epithelial KB cells while inhibiting the adherence of S. mutans to KB cells. The eight H2O2-producing isolates were neither haemolytic based on a blood-agar test, cytotoxic according to lactate dehydrogenase assay, nor resistant to eight antibiotics represented by the European Food Safety Authority guideline, indicating that the isolates have potential to suppress the cariogenesis driven by S. mutans while providing general probiotic benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The oral cavity, a gateway for microorganisms to the human internal system, provides a suitable environment including, but not limited to, humidity, temperature, pH, and nutrients for the cultivation of commensal microbes1. As such, the human host and its microbiome have established a unique ecology as a combined unit with a bidirectional relationship2,3. Studies have found that microbial dysbiosis, an ecological imbalance between pathogenic and beneficial microorganisms, can lead to oral diseases, such as caries and periodontal disease3. On the other hand, many antibiotics, routinely used in dentistry to prevent bacteraemia, can increase the number of antibiotic-resistant strains while breaking the healthy ecology of the oral cavity, leading to systemic infections4,5.
Dental caries is one of the highly prevalent non-communicable and chronic diseases, demanding expensive healthcare budgets in industrialized countries6,7. As of 2019, untreated dental caries continues to be a significant global public health issue with more than 3 billion new cases (48% increase), 2 billion prevalent cases (46% increase), and 2 million years lived with disabilities (YLDs) (46% increase) since 19908. Dental caries, often known as tooth decay or cavities, is determined by the imbalanced demineralization caused by pathogenic factors including acidogenic and aciduric bacteria such as mutans streptococci (MS)9.
Streptococcus mutans, a facultative anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium found in the human oral cavity, belongs to the MS group, has an increased ability to adhere to the tooth surface, metabolizes sucrose to produce lactic acid that weakens tooth enamel, and converts sucrose to a sticky insoluble dextran-based polysaccharide that allows plaque formation10,11. Thus, S. mutans is considered to be a primary agent that initiates and develops dental caries12. Of note, numerous investigations have demonstrated that dental caries is caused by microbial dysbiosis in the oral cavity13. The ecological imbalance, a temporary status when cariogenic pathobionts outnumber commensal symbionts, can transform non-cariogenic plaque into a cariogenic one. Thus, it is important to contain the spreading of cariogenic bacteria such as MS while keeping commensal bacteria from developing into pathobionts. Consequently, much effort has been focused on inhibiting S. mutans growth using probiotics as a biological intervention that minimizes the disruption of ecological balance in the oral cavity12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20.
The genus Limosilactobacillus, a member of the family Lactobacillaceae, is a thermophilic and heterofermentative genus of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and comprises 31 species, some of which are relevant to industry and medicine21. L. fermentum is one of the most widely commercialized heterofermentative limocilactobacilli, commonly isolated from various human body locations and fermenting materials22. The bacterium produces diverse antimicrobial peptides, bacteriocins, and, in some cases, H2O2 upon exposure to molecular oxygen23. While many species of LAB can generate enough H2O2 to inhibit the growth of S. mutans16,17,20,24, studies on the oral probiotic function of L. fermentum via H2O2 against S. mutans are still lacking.
The Human Microbiome Project (HMP), supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from 2007 to 2016, has examined a range of microbial habitats in the oral cavity, such as saliva, buccal mucosa, keratinized gingiva, palate, tonsils, throat and tongue soft tissues, and supra-and subgingival dental plaque25. The expanded HMP (HMP-II) further selected buccal mucosa, supragingival plaque, and tongue dorsum among the oral landscape for the analysis of body-wide strain diversity, showing that strain profiles were site-specific and stable over time1,26,27. The resulting microbial profiles in the oral cavity are available on the expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (eHOMD v3, http://homd.org/, accessed on 10 December 2022), currently enlisting 774 species of which 58% are formally named, 16% unnamed but cultivated, and 26% known but uncultivated. The human tongue dorsum is rich in papillae on the non-keratinized epithelial layer that absorb small molecules including postbiotic compounds, enabling interaction with the host1,28. Thus, the role of tongue-coating (TC) microbiota has gained much traction because of its association with metabolic disorders28.
This study aimed to isolate new probiotic LAB with antimicrobial activity against S. mutans from human TC biospecimens obtained from 100 healthy volunteers. We successfully isolated 77 LAB of which species were identified by 16S rRNA partial sequencing and found three new species that are not listed in HOMD. We found that eight out of 12 L. fermentum isolates inhibited S. mutans growth by producing H2O2, dramatically reduced the formation of S. mutans plaque, and suppressed the adherence of S. mutans to oral epithelial cells while satisfying the safety guidelines on haemolysis, cytotoxicity, and antibiotics resistance recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)29.
Results
Isolation of LAB species from the human tongue-coating biospecimens
We initially isolated a total of 85 colonies from the human tongue coating specimens collected and distributed by the Korea Oral Biobank Network (KOBN) (Fig. 1). Successive cultivation resulted in 77 stable LAB isolates, which belong to eight different genera and 11 different species according to the reclassified nomenclature (Table 1) 21. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (n = 17) showed the highest incidence, followed by Lactobacillus gasseri (n = 14), Limosilactobacillus vaginalis (n = 13), L. fermentum (n = 12), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (n = 9), Lacticaseibacillus paracasei (n = 4), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (n = 3), Limosilactobacillus mucosae (n = 2), Levilactobacillus brevis (n = 1), Lentilactobacillus sunkii (n = 1), and Liquorilactobacillus nagelii (n = 1). Among them, L. mucosae, L. sunkii, and L. nagelii are newly found species not listed in HOMD.
Selection of LAB isolates inhibiting the growth of S. mutans
The antimicrobial activity of 77 LAB isolates against S. mutans was screened by the customized zone of inhibition (ZOI) test. Among the 12 L. fermentum isolates, nine L. fermentum isolates (DM005, DM050, DM051, DM055, DM056, DM058, DM066, DM072, and DM077) showed clear ZOIs (Fig. 2a,b). In contrast, the rest three (DM061, DM062, and DM075) failed to form visible ZOIs, allowing S. mutans to grow together with the isolates (Fig. 2c). These results implicated that the nine functional isolates, unlike the other inactive ones, produce certain antibacterial compounds against S. mutans. Interestingly, the three non-functional isolates survived at pH 2.5 while the nine functional isolates only survived at pH 3.0 than the three non-functional isolates (Supplementary Fig. S1), suggesting differences in proton pumping, proton consumption, or alkali production pathways between the two groups30.
Inhibition of S. mutans growth by H2O2-producing L. fermentum isolates
Several studies previously demonstrated that the growth of S. mutans was inhibited by H2O2-producing bacteria20,31. To evaluate whether H2O2 production is linked to antibacterial activity against S. mutans, we used de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) agar supplemented with 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) to colourise the H2O2-producing colonies. Upon exposure to molecular oxygen, the colonies of the nine L. fermentum isolates turned into blue colours, indicating the input peroxidase successfully catalysed the TMB oxidation in the presence of H2O2 produced by the isolates (Fig. 2d). However, the colours of the other three L. fermentum isolates did not change (Fig. 2e). Next, to examine if the inhibition of S. mutans growth is mediated by H2O2, the overnight-cultured H2O2-producing L. fermentum isolates were supplemented with 0.167 μg/μL of catalase and 3 μL of each mixture were dropped onto BHI agar on which S. mutans was seeded. After incubation in microaerobic conditions (5% oxygen) at 37 °C for 2 days, ZOIs disappeared and S. mutans formed colonies within the L. fermentum spot areas with equivalent colony size and density (Fig. 2f). In addition, the size of ZOI was inversely proportional to the concentration of catalase, indicating that H2O2 is mediating the inhibition of the growth of S. mutans (Fig. 2g).
Inhibition of S. mutans-mediated artificial plaque formation
To prove the inhibitory activity of the L. fermentum isolates against plaque formation, S. mutans was shake-incubated with a stainless-steel orthodontic archwire, a hydroxyapatite disk, and a human tooth in the absence or presence of each L. fermentum isolate. We observed a heavy biofilm formation on the wire, the hydroxyapatite disk, and the tooth when incubated with S. mutans only (Fig. 3a, left lanes). On the contrary, in the presence of the nine L. fermentum isolates (DM005 ~ DM077), the formation of biofilms on the wires, disks, and teeth was completely suppressed (Fig. 3a).
Inhibition of S. mutans adherence to oral epithelial cells
Next, we tested whether S. mutans adherence to oral epithelial KB cells was also inhibited by the nine L. fermentum isolates. To that end, KB cells were co-incubated with a 1:1 mixture of S. mutans and each L. fermentum isolate and the levels of S. mutans attached to KB cells were assessed by quantitative PCR analysis as a ratio of colony forming unit (CFU) to one KB cell (CFU/cell). The number of S. mutans adhered to KB cells in the absence of L. fermentum isolates was 2.89 ± 0.11 CFU/cell (Fig. 3b). In contrast, when KB cells were co-incubated with L. fermentum isolates, the adherence of S. mutans to KB cells decreased (< 1.0 CFU/cell) except in the case of DM005 (5.08 ± 0.02 CFU/cell). Next, to verify if the inhibition of the S. mutans adherence to KB cells stems from the competitive binding of L. fermentum to KB cells, we incubated L. fermentum with KB cells and determined the number of attached L. fermentum cells per KB cell. As expected, L. fermentum DM005 adhered to KB cells at the lowest level (2.46 ± 0.33 CFU/cell) compared to the other isolates (Fig. 3c), explaining the previous results of the lowest inhibitory function of DM005 as shown in Fig. 3b. Together, these results indicated that L. fermentum isolates, except DM005, could adhere to the oral epithelial cells to competitively suppress S. mutans adherence to the oral epithelial cells. We thus excluded DM005 in the following steps for the safety evaluation.
Safety evaluation
No haemolytic activities were observed when the selected L. fermentum strains were cultured on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) supplemented with sheep blood for 2 days at 37 °C (Fig. 4a) 32. By contrast, Porphyromonas gingivalis, a well-known haemolytic bacterium yielded a loss of colour around the colonies. We next determined the cytotoxicity of the eight isolates by measuring cytosolic lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released from damaged Caco-2 cells33. As shown in Fig. 4b, the amount of released LDH was negligible for all the isolates, indicating the isolates were non-cytotoxic to mammalian cells. Next, we qualitatively determined the bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity using taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA)-supplemented MRS agar34. No opaque halos or precipitates around the colonies nor morphological differences between colonies grown on TDCA-free and TDCA-supplemented agar plates were found, indicating that all the L. fermentum candidates have negligible BSH activities (Fig. 4c). In addition, the amount of D-lactate the eight isolates generate ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 mM, much lower than 0.01–0.25 mM of normal plasma levels and > 3 mM of plasma level of D-lactic acidosis (Supplementary Fig. S2)35.
Antibiotic profiling
Previously, genomic analyses of DM072 using CARD (v3.2.3) and ResFinder (v4.1) yielded no antimicrobial resistance genes36. In this study, we tried to confirm the antibiotic susceptibility of the eight L. fermentum candidates employing the cut-off levels recommended by EFSA. The susceptibility and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all the isolates were tested on a LAB-susceptibility test medium (LSM) containing a serial dilution of antibiotic compounds, such as gentamicin (GEN), kanamycin (KAN), streptomycin (STR), tetracycline (TET), erythromycin (ERY), clindamycin (CLIN), chloramphenicol (CHL), and ampicillin (AMP), and determined MICs according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) criteria for obligate heterofermentative LAB. All eight strains were susceptible to all antibiotics tested in this study (Table 2). Notably, all the tested strains were the most susceptible to CLIN, a class of lincomycin, up to 32-fold low concentration (0.032 mg/L) compared to cut-off values of 1.0 mg/L (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1). The antibiotics that showed the closest to the cut-off values were KAN (16.0 mg/L), ERY (0.5 mg/L), and CHL (2.0 mg/L), all of which were on the border of the MIC criteria. Overall, the strain DM072 was most susceptible to antibiotics tested, especially for the aminoglycoside class and tetracycline.
Phylogenomic and functional analyses
The 16S rRNA sequences of the 12 isolates and whole-genome sequence (WGS) of DM072 and DM075 (Supplementary Fig. S3) were deposited in GenBank (Supplementary Table S2). Phylogenetic analysis of the 12 isolates based on 16S rRNA sequences showed that the eight H2O2-producing strains except DM005 were grouped into one species clade (Fig. 5a). Rather, the strain DM005 was phylogenetically closer to DM061 and DM062 even if it was classified as the H2O2-producing strains. This is consistent with the inhibitory profile of the nine isolates against S. mutans adhesion to KB cells, where DM005 was the inactive lone strain (See Fig. 3b,c).
Previously, we calculated the average nucleotide identity (ANI) of DM072, identifying L. fermentum IMDO130101 as the closest strain with 99.47% sequence identity36. In this study, we performed WGS-based phylogenomic analyses of DM072 based on the Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny approach (GBDP) as implemented on the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS) website (Fig. 5b) 37. Unlike ANI analysis using OrthoANI36, the putative type species L. fermentum ATCC 14931 was placed next to DM072 strain, probably because of the differences in algorithms and databases between those tools. The functional annotation of DM072 genes was performed using eggNOG-mapper v2 based on eggNOG (v5.0)38,39. A total of 1790 COG-categorised genes were returned, showing 290 and 6 genes involved in cellular processes and signalling, 541 and 12 information storage and processing, 771 and 7 metabolism, and 313 and 6 poorly characterized for chromosome and plasmid, respectively (Fig. 5c).
Discussion
Oral probiotics offer an indirect but holistic method to restore microbial ecology, thereby eliciting the healthy status of the oral cavity while minimizing unwanted side effects40. Conversely, the healthy oral cavity provides a higher probability of finding beneficial strains adapted to the target site where the growth of pathogens is sufficiently suppressed, as evidenced by several oral probiotic LAB isolated from the oral cavity15,41,42,43. In the case of dental caries, some LAB found in the oral cavity reduce the acid burden caused by caries-associated bacteria, such as S. mutans, by re-establishing pH homeostasis44 while others produce H2O2 at concentrations sufficient to be toxic to microorganisms lacking H2O2-scavenging enzymes20,45,46. In this study, we aimed to isolate LAB that have inhibitory activities against S. mutans from TC biospecimens of healthy volunteers. Among the isolated LAB strains, nine L. fermentum isolates (DM005, DM050, DM051, DM055, DM056, DM058, DM066, DM072, and DM077) suppressed the growth of S. mutans by producing H2O2. Intriguingly, the rest three L. fermentum isolates (DM061, DM062, and DM075) did not produce H2O2 and thus failed to inhibit the growth of S. mutans, confirming that the effective materials produced by probiotics are strain-specific47.
There have been various attempts to isolate LAB from the oral cavity. For example, 30 lactobacillus strains from 100 Iranian saliva samples48, 140 H2O2-producing LAB were isolated from the saliva of 460 healthy children in S. Korea49, 8 isolates from the saliva swabs from 26 healthy volunteers of Caucasian and Asian ethnicities, 500 colonies including 50 lactobacilli from the saliva of 200 adults in S. Korea20,24, and 896 strains of LAB from the dental plaque and tongue coatings of 32 healthy volunteers in Japan50. In this study, we isolated 85 LAB from 5% of the 100 human tongue coating specimens stored in VMG2 media optimised for biosample transport51. The apparent detection rates vary owing to the differences in sample types, the methods for sample collection, storage, and selection, as well as the purpose of the studies.
Many bacterial species in the human body produce H2O2 to serve as opportunistic pathobionts, such as S. pyogenes, S. mutans, S. pneumoniae52,53,54, or as beneficial commensals, such as Bifidobacterium bifidum, L. johnsonii, L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri55,56,57,58. The production of H2O2 occurs in energy metabolism by oxidases, such as lactate oxidase (Lox)54, NADH oxidase (Nox)52,59, pyruvate oxidase (Pox)53, and NADH-dependent flavin reductase60. Given that S. mutans also produces H2O2 via NADH oxidase52, the amount of H2O2 it produces should be regulated to stand oxidative stress61. By contrast, the amount of H2O2 the nine L. fermentum isolates produce appeared to be higher enough to suppress S. mutans, implying that the pathogen has low or minimal activities of H2O2-scavenging enzymes62. Further, a whole-genome sequencing analysis of strain DM072 revealed a gene encoding Pox36, implying that DM072 produce H2O2 via a Pox-dependent pathway. Intriguingly, a genomic analysis of DM075 yielded no Pox-encoding genes63, partially explaining the difference in H2O2 production ability between the isolated L. fermentum strains. However, additional genomic and transcriptomic analyses should be conducted to determine the activities of oxidases and scavengers related to H2O2 production by the nine isolates.
The initial stages of cariogenic biofilm formation on hard and soft tissues include the synthesis of adhesive glucan from sucrose by glucosyltransferases of S. mutans to promote the clustering of other microorganisms containing glucan-binding proteins11. LAB are known to inhibit pathogen growth, adhesion, and co-aggregation by the secretion of antimicrobial substances as well as the generation of an unfavourable environment for pathogens64. Previously, the formation of artificial plaque by S. mutans was partially blocked by E. faecium T765 and fully suppressed by L. gasseri HHuMIN D20 and L. fermentum OK24. We further evaluated the inhibitory function of the isolates not only on hard tissues such as orthodontic appliances66, hydroxyapatite disks67, and extracted human teeth, but also on soft tissues such as oral epithelial cells20,24,41,68. As expected, co-incubation of the isolates competitively and completely prevented S. mutans from artificial plaque formation on all kinds of hard surfaces and adherence to KB cells (see Fig. 3). Notably, the isolates did not form a biofilm on hard surfaces while competitively adhered to soft tissues. Given that acidogenic LAB can also cause dental caries, it would be preferable for the isolates to competitively adhere to epithelial cells rather than form a biofilm on hard surfaces, allowing them to remain in the oral cavity for longer. Of note, DM005 failed to inhibit S. mutans attachment to KB cells, which can be explained by its low ability to adhere to KB cells (see Fig. 3b,c). Interestingly, a phylogenetic analysis of the 12 isolates using 16S rRNA sequences revealed the least likelihood of DM005 among the nine H2O2-producing strains, supporting the experimental difference between DM005 and others.
The BSH activity has often been included among the criteria for probiotic strain selection. The transformation of primary bile acids (BAs) to secondary BAs by microbial BSH plays an important role in shaping host health, greatly expanding the downstream host metabolism of lipids and glucose while possibly increasing the toxicity of bile acids69,70. Consequently, contradictory reports have been made regarding BSH activity owing to the widespread distribution of BSH among LAB coupled with multiple health benefits including a reduction in inflammation and blood cholesterol levels, urinary tract infections, symptoms of Crohn’s disease and atopic dermatitis71,72. BSH also catalyses further biotransformation of the secondary BAs such as TDCA, enabling qualitative assay of BSH activity as recommended by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). However, BSHs from different bacteria have their own substrate specificities, activities, and resistance to the primary and secondary BAs70. In our study, the selected L. fermentum isolates showed no precipitate originating from deconjugated TDCA in plate assay, indicating the isolates have a negligible BSH activity specific for TDCA. Also, bsh-related genes encoding BSH were not found in the DM072 genome when analysed by NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP)73 and eggNOG (v5.0)38 (data not shown). It should be noted, however, that bsh genes can be acquired horizontally74 and thus the beneficial and harmful effects of bacteria that can metabolite BAs should be determined in a collective and concerted manner within their ecological niche.
Many LAB can produce L-, D-, racemate DL-lactate, or a combination of these, which have been consumed by humans as fermented foods and used for therapeutic purposes75. Previously, the level of D-lactate produced by 15 probiotic LAB including Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and Pediococcus have been reported to range from 0.31 to 33.0 mM76. In one study, a widely commercialized probiotic L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103, LGG) was reported to produce up to 7.6 mM of D-lactate in 24-h MRS culture supernatant77. In humans, elevated D-lactate plasma levels are responsible for rare metabolic symptomology that has only been reported in patients with short bowel syndrome75. However, associations between D-lactic acid bacteria and D-lactic acidosis are unclear as numerous clinical studies reported the therapeutic efficacy of D-lactic acid-producing bacteria without causing D-lactic acidosis75. Thus, care must be taken in the categorisation of D-lactic acid-producing bacteria as generally unsafe.
In this study, during the establishment of the oral LAB library from the TC biospecimens, we found three LAB species (L. mucosae, L. sunkii, and L. nagelii) not listed in HOMD (See Table 1). Given that the differences in food cultures of different regions and ethnic groups can yield different bacterial species adapted to the oral cavity, probiotic strains derived from the oral cavity may also be regio- and ethno-specific. An antimicrobial resistance profile of oral probiotic candidates could also be regiospecific owing to differences in the prescription regimen of antibiotics and the use of antibiotics in food materials between countries. On condition that the use of antibiotics should be and has been regulated, discovering probiotic strains from the oral cavity is more beneficiary because the orally adapted strains originate mostly from the edible ingredients in staple and preferred diets regardless of regionality and ethnicity. Indeed, we successfully isolated multiple L. fermentum candidates in the oral LAB library obtained from Korean volunteers that effectively inhibited the growth of S. mutans while satisfying the safety criteria, especially for antibiotics, based on EFSA guidelines. Thus, with successful in vivo and clinical studies and stability evaluations, the selected oral L. fermentum strains could serve as oral probiotic agents that can reverse the dysbiotic and cariogenic microbial ecology in the oral cavity while providing general probiotic benefits.
Methods
Isolation and identification of TC-originating LAB strains
All procedures were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations approved by the ethics committee of the Institutional Review Board of the Apple Tree Dental Hospital (approval number: ATDH-2021–0001) and the Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy (approval number: P01-202111-31-002). The TC biospecimens, collected from 100 healthy adults (15 males, 85 females; mean age 28.23 years; range 21–51 years) with little or no supragingival plaque, were distributed by the Biobank of Apple Tree Dental Hospital, a part of the Korea Biobank Network (KBN). The TC samples were resuspended in 4 mL of VMG2 media51 and stored at -80 °C until used. To isolate TC-derived LAB, 0.2 mL of TC samples in VMG2 media (5%) were diluted tenfold with Lactobacillus Selective (LBS) broth (Kisan Bio, Korea) and plated onto 20 plates of LBS agar (100 μL per plate) and anaerobically incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The colonized isolates were identified by 16S rRNA partial sequencing (Macrogen, Inc., Korea).
Growth inhibition of tooth-decaying pathogen by LAB isolates
S. mutans strain KCOM 1054 was obtained from the Korean Collection for Oral Microbiology (KCOM) of the Korea National Research Resource Centre (KNRRC). After cultivation in BD Difco™ Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Fisher Scientific, USA) under 5% microaerobic conditions (5% oxygen) at 37 °C for 24 h, the S. mutans cells were spread on BHI agar (Fisher Scientific, USA) to form one million colony-forming units (CFU). On top of the S. mutans colonies dropped 3 μL of each culture medium of the isolates, followed by incubation under microaerobic conditions (5% oxygen) at 37 °C for 24 h. The diameter of the zones of inhibition was then measured with ZEN software (Zeiss, Germany).
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production assay
H2O2 production was analysed as described by Eschenbach et al78 with minor modifications. In brief, selective agar plates were prepared by supplementing 1.0 mM of TMB (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 10 μg/mL of peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) with MRS agar (Fisher Scientific, USA). The LAB isolates were individually diluted in MRS broth, spread on TMB-MRS selective agar plates, and incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h. The TMB-MRS plates were then exposed to air for 30 min to allow the generation of H2O2 by the selected LAB isolates, which will be consumed by peroxidase that catalyses the oxidation of TMB to yield blue colour. To confirm the effect of H2O2, 0.5 μg of catalase (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was supplemented per 3 μL of each LAB culture medium during S. mutans inhibition assay. The dose-dependent effects of the catalase were tested using the lower amount of 0.25 and 0.125 μg.
Inhibition of artificial plaque formation
Human teeth (FDI dental numbers: 11, 12, 21, 22, 32) were distributed by the Biobank of Apple Tree Dental Hospital in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations approved by the ethics committee of the Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy (approval number: P01-202302-02-003). Solid Stainless Steel orthodontic wires (0.016″ diameter, 14″ length) (Ultimate Wireforms, USA), hydroxyapatite discs (0.38″ diameter, 0.2″ thickness) (Clarkson Chromatography Products, PA, USA), and human teeth were autoclaved before use. The formation of artificial plaque and inhibition assay using orthodontic wires was conducted as previously described by Yu et al65. with minor modifications. Briefly, an equal amount (4 mL) of overnight-cultured S. mutans and each isolate were inoculated in a 50 mL polycarbonate tube containing 30 mL of MRS:BHI (1:1) broth supplemented with 0.1 M 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS, pH 7.0) (Kisan Bio, Korea) and 5% sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The orthodontic wires were immersed in each culture tube containing bacterial cells and shake-incubated at 100 rpm at 37 °C for 12 h. The hydroxyapatite discs were placed at the center of each well of 12-well plate containing 3 mL of culture medium and shake-incubated at 100 rpm at 37 °C for 48 h67. The extracted, biobanked, and distributed human teeth were fixed on 3 M™ ESPE™ Soft Putty (3 M India, India) and placed at the bottom of each 10 mL cylindrical tube containing 5 mL of culture medium and shake-incubated at 100 rpm at 37 °C for 48 h.
Inhibition of S. mutans adhesion to oral epithelial cells by LAB isolates
The competitive adhesion test was performed using a modified version of a previously reported method79. Human oral epithelial KB cells (Korean Cell Line Bank, No.10017) were grown in RPMI1640 medium (Corning, USA) containing L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Atlas Biologicals, USA), and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution (Corning, USA). KB cells were seeded at a concentration of 2.0 × 105 cells in a 6-well tissue culture plate and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After 2 days at late post-confluence, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and added with 2 mL of RPMI1640 containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA). After incubation for 2 h, the medium was changed to 1 mL of RPMI1640. KB cells from two wells were collected and their concentration was determined under optical microscopy using a haemocytometer (Marienfeld, Germany). Overnight-cultured S. mutans and the isolates were pelleted and resuspended with RPMI1640 at a concentration of approximately 1.0 × 109 cells/mL. An equal volume (0.5 mL) of S. mutans and each isolate were mixed respectively and incubated under 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After 1 h, each well was washed three times with PBS, and 0.2 mL of trypsin/EDTA was applied to collect the KB cells and the S. mutans cells attached to KB cells. The genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the collected cells and used for a quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis using Exicycler™ 96 Real-Time PCR systems (Bioneer, Korea), SYBR Green PCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and primers for S. mutans glucosyltransferase I gene (5′-CTACACTTTCGGGTGGCTTG-3′ and 5′-GAAGCTTTTCACCATTAGAAGCTG-3′)20. The reaction conditions comprise the first denaturation step for 3 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of a denaturation step for 10 s at 95 °C and an annealing/extension step for 20 s at 60 °C. The standard curve was created by plotting the CFU numbers of S. mutans against the respective mean cycle threshold (CT) values. Each competitive adhesion test was conducted in triplicate and the results were shown as the CFU number of S. mutans attached to one KB cell.
LAB adhesion to oral epithelial cells
The adhesion test was conducted as described by Scaletsky et al80 with minor modifications. KB cells were grown in RPMI1640 medium containing L-glutamine, 10% FBS, and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution. KB cells were seeded at a concentration of 5.0 × 104 cells in a 24-well tissue culture plate and incubated under 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After 2 days at late post-confluence, the monolayer was washed twice with PBS, and 0.5 mL of RPMI1640 containing 2% BSA was added to each well. After incubation for 2 h, the medium was changed to 0.5 mL of RPMI1640. KB cells from three wells were collected and their concentration was determined under optical microscopy using a hemocytometer (Marienfeld, Germany). Overnight-cultured LAB isolates were centrifugated and the supernatant was removed. Each pellet was resuspended with RPMI1640 at a concentration of approximately 1.0 × 108 cells/mL, of which 0.5 mL was further incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 1 h. KB cells were then washed three times with PBS and lysed using 0.05% of Triton-X100 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Serial dilutions of the lysates were plated onto MRS agar plates and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 24 h. The CFU number was counted to evaluate the extent to which LAB isolates adhered to KB cells. Each test was conducted in triplicate and the results were shown as the CFU number of the bacterial cells attached to one KB cell.
Haemolysis test
Haemolysis was observed by anaerobic incubation of the isolates in TSA (Fisher Scientific, USA) supplemented with 5% sheep blood (Kisan Bio, Korea) at 37 °C for 2 days32. The loss of blood colour around colonies indicates haemolysis.
Cytotoxicity test
Caco-2 cells were grown in DMEM (Corning, USA) medium containing L-glutamine, 10% FBS, and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution33. Caco-2 cells were seeded at a concentration of 1.0 × 104 cells in a 96-well tissue culture plate and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After 5 days at late post-confluence, Caco-2 cells were treated with overnight-cultured LAB isolates at a concentration of approximately 1.0 × 108 cells and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After 24 h incubation, the culture medium was centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm and the supernatants were analysed for LDH measurement using LDH Activity Colorimetric Assay Kit (BioVision, USA)81. The lysate extracted from Caco-2 cells at late post-confluence using 0.1% Triton-X100 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used as the positive control. The culture medium of Caco-2 cells at late post-confluence without LAB treatment was used as the negative control. Cytotoxicity (%) was calculated by (test sample – negative control)/(positive control – negative control) × 100.
Bile salt hydrolase (BSH) assay
The overnight cultures of LAB strains were streaked onto MRS agar plates supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The strains producing precipitate halos or white opaque colonies were considered BSH-active strains according to Dashkevicz et al34.
Antibiotic susceptibility test
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for LAB isolates were determined in LSM medium (90% of Iso-Sensitest broth (Kisan Bio, Korea) and 10% MRS broth) according to the ISO 10932:2010 broth microdilution procedure82. LSM medium was supplemented with serial dilutions of antibiotic compounds including GEN (0.5–256 mg/L), KAN (2–1024 mg/L), STR (0.5–256 mg/L), TET (2–1024 mg/L), ERY (0.016–8 mg/L), CLIN (0.032–16 mg/L), CHL (0.125–64 mg/L), and AMP (0.032–16 mg/L). Overnight-cultured LAB isolates were added at a concentration of 105 CFU and anaerobically incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial compounds at which the growth of the isolates was inhibited. The growth was measured at 600 nm absorbance using a SpectraMax iD3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) and MICs were compared to the cut-off values recommended by the EFSA29.
Phylogenomic and functional analysis
Initial alignment of 16S rRNA sequences of 12 isolates was conducted using CLUSTALW (https://genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw) and phylogenetic reconstructions were performed using the function "build" of ETE3 3.1.283 implemented on the GenomeNet (https://www.genome.jp/tools/ete/). Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree was inferred using PhyML v20160115 ran with model and parameters: –pinv e –alpha e –nclasses 4 -o tlr -f m –bootstrap -284. Branch supports are the Chi2-based parametric values returned by the approximate likelihood ratio test.
For WGS-based phylogenomic identification and phylogenomic tree construction, the WGS data of DM072 were submitted to the TYGS, a free bioinformatics platform available under https://tygs.dsmz.de, and the type-based species clustering was done using a 70% dDDH threshold85. The analysis also made use of recently introduced methodological updates and features37. The phylogenetic tree was inferred with FastME 2.1.6.186 from GBDP distances calculated from genome sequences. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of the GBDP distance formula d5. Information on nomenclature, synonymy and associated taxonomic literature was provided by TYGS's sister database, the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN, available at https://lpsn.dsmz.de)37. The results were provided by the TYGS on 2022–12-05.
An automated functional annotation of genes was performed using eggNOG-mapper v2 based on fast orthology assignments using precomputed eggNOG 5.0 clusters and phylogenies38,39. The Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) category was extracted from eggNOG results and sorted according to the NCBI’s 25 functional categories designated from A to Z. If necessary, the NCBI PGAP73 was used to compare the annotation results. Circular genome maps were generated using Proksee (https://proksee.ca/).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM by Prism software (GraphPad Software, USA). Differences between the means were measured by one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05.
Ethics statement
The collection and distribution of biospecimens by the Biobank of Apple Tree Dental Hospital was approved by the ethics committee of the Apple Tree Medical Foundation (IRB number: ATDH-2021–0001). All participants understood the purpose of the study and provided informed consent. The study using the distributed TC biospecimens (IRB approval number: P01-202111-31-002) and human teeth (IRB approval number: P01-202303-02-003) were approved by the ethics committee of the Public Institutional Review Board (http://public.irb.or.kr) run by the Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy.
Data availability
The 16S rRNA partial sequences of 12 L. fermentum and WGS of DM072 and DM075 are available in GenBank at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The accession numbers for the 16S rRNA partial sequences of DM005, DM050, DM051, DM055, DM056, DM058, DM066, DM072, and DM077 are OP782688, OP787483, OP795824, OP795825, OP795823, OP795827, OP787485, OP579180, OP787484, OP787866, OP795828, and OP579185, respectively. The accession numbers are summarised in Supplementary Table S2.
References
Welch, J. L. M., Dewhirst, F. E. & Borisy, G. G. Biogeography of the oral microbiome: The site-specialist hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062503 (2019).
Cornejo Ulloa, P., van der Veen, M. H. & Krom, B. P. Review: Modulation of the oral microbiome by the host to promote ecological balance. Odontology 107, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00413-x (2019).
Lamont, R. J., Koo, H. & Hajishengallis, G. The oral microbiota: Dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0089-x (2018).
Harrison, G. A. J., Rubin, M. P., Davies, R. M. & Speller, D. C. E. Resistance in oral streptococci after repetition of a single-dose amoxycillin prophylactic regimen. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 15, 501–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/15.4.501 (1985).
Patangia, D. V., Anthony Ryan, C., Dempsey, E., Paul Ross, R. & Stanton, C. Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health. Microbiologyopen 11, e1260 (2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1260
WHO. Oral Health, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health (2022).
Giacaman, R. A. et al. Understanding dental caries as a non-communicable and behavioral disease: Management implications. Front. Oral Health 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2022.764479 (2022).
Qin, X., Zi, H. & Zeng, X. Changes in the global burden of untreated dental caries from 1990 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study. Heliyon 8, e10714 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10714
Conrads, G. & About, I. Pathophysiology of dental caries in caries excavation: Evolution of treating cavitated carious lesions. Monogr. Oral Sci. 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487826 (2018).
Bowen, W. H. & Koo, H. Biology of Streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms. Caries Res. 45, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1159/000324598 (2011).
Lee, Y. J., Kim, M.-A., Kim, J.-G. & Kim, J.-H. Detection of Streptococcus mutans in human saliva and plaque using selective media, polymerase chain reaction, and monoclonal antibodies. Oral Biol. Res. 43, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.43.02.201906.121 (2019).
Schwendicke, F. et al. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans Growth and Biofilm Formation by Probiotics in vitro. Caries Res. 51, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1159/000452960 (2017).
Banas, J. A. & Drake, D. R. Are the mutans streptococci still considered relevant to understanding the microbial etiology of dental caries?. BMC Oral Health 18, 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0595-2 (2018).
Hasslöf, P., Hedberg, M., Twetman, S. & Stecksén-Blicks, C. Growth inhibition of oral mutans streptococci and candida by commercial probiotic lactobacilli - an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 10, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-10-18 (2010).
Bosch, M. et al. Isolation and characterization of probiotic strains for improving oral health. Arch. Oral Biol. 57, 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.10.006 (2012).
Wasfi, R., Abd El-Rahman, O. A., Zafer, M. M. & Ashour, H. M. Probiotic Lactobacillus sp inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of caries-inducing Streptococcus mutans. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 22, 1972–1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13496 (2018).
Fang, F., Xu, J., Li, Q., Xia, X. & Du, G. Characterization of a Lactobacillus brevis strain with potential oral probiotic properties. BMC Microbiol. 18, 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1369-3 (2018).
Zhang, G. et al. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and virulence by Lactobacillus plantarum K41 isolated from traditional Sichuan pickles. Front. Microbiol. 11, 774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00774 (2020).
Bijle, M. N., Neelakantan, P., Ekambaram, M., Lo, E. C. M. & Yiu, C. K. Y. Effect of a novel synbiotic on Streptococcus mutans. Sci. Rep. 10, 7951. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64956-8 (2020).
Mann, S. et al. Oral probiotic activities and biosafety of Lactobacillus gasseri HHuMIN D. Microb. Cell Fact. 20, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-021-01563-w (2021).
Zheng, J. et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70, 2782–2858. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 (2020).
Naghmouchi, K. et al. Lactobacillus fermentum: a bacterial species with potential for food preservation and biomedical applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 60, 3387–3399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1688250 (2020).
Bryukhanov, A. L., Klimko, A. I. & Netrusov, A. I. Antioxidant properties of lactic acid bacteria. Microbiology 91, 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261722601439 (2022).
Mann, S. et al. Isolation, characterization and biosafety evaluation of Lactobacillus fermentum OK with potential oral probiotic properties. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 13, 1363–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09761-z (2021).
Huttenhower, C. et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11234 (2012).
Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 550, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23889 (2017).
Mark Welch, J. L., Ramírez-Puebla, S. T. & Borisy, G. G. Oral microbiome geography: Micron-scale habitat and niche. Cell Host Microbe 28, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.009 (2020).
Li, Y. et al. Oral, tongue-coating microbiota, and metabolic disorders: A novel area of interactive research. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.730203 (2021).
Rychen, G. et al. Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J. 16, e05206 (2018). Doi: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5206
Wen, Z. T., Huang, X., Ellepola, K., Liao, S. & Li, Y. Lactobacilli and human dental caries: more than mechanical retention. Microbiology 168, 1. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001196 (2022).
Scoffield, J. et al. Dietary nitrite drives disease outcomes in oral polymicrobial infections. J. Dent. Res. 98, 1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519855348 (2019).
Kim, M. J. et al. Safety evaluations of Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Bifidobacterium longum BORI. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051422 (2018).
Bhat, M. I., Singh, V. K., Sharma, D., Kapila, S. & Kapila, R. Adherence capability and safety assessment of an indigenous probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus MTCC-5897. Microb. Pathog. 130, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.03.009 (2019).
Dashkevicz, M. P. & Feighner, S. D. Development of a differential medium for bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.55.1.11-16.1989 (1989).
Levitt, M. D. & Levitt, D. G. Quantitative evaluation of D-lactate pathophysiology: New insights into the mechanisms involved and the many areas in need of further investigation. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 13, 321–337. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceg.s260600PMID-32982363 (2020).
Park, D.-Y. et al. Complete genome sequence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Limosilactobacillus fermentum DM072 isolated from the human oral cavity. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 0, e00897–00822 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.00897-22
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Carbasse, J. S., Peinado-Olarte, R. L. & Göker, M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucl. Acids Res. 50, D801–D807. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab902 (2021).
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucl. Acids Res. 47, D309–D314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1085
Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernández-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5825–5829. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab293 (2021).
Nguyen, T., Brody, H., Radaic, A. & Kapila, Y. Probiotics for periodontal health—Current molecular findings. Periodontol. 2000(87), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12382 (2021).
Strahinic, I. et al. Molecular and biochemical characterizations of human oral lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 22, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00331.x (2007).
Kõll, P. et al. Characterization of oral lactobacilli as potential probiotics for oral health. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 23, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00402.x (2008).
Azizian, K. et al. Inhibitory effect of isolated Lactobacillus from oral cavity against bacterial pathogens and its effect on health promotion. ARS Pharm. 60, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.30827/ars.v60i1.7943 (2019).
Senneby, A., Davies, J. R., Svensäter, G. & Neilands, J. Acid tolerance properties of dental biofilms in vivo. BMC Microbiol. 17, 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1074-7 (2017).
Silhacek, K. J. & Taake, K. R. Sodium bicarbonate and hydrogen peroxide: The effect on the growth of Streptococcus mutans. J. Dent. Hyg. 79, 7 (2005).
Huang, X. et al. A highly arginolytic streptococcus species that potently antagonizes Streptococcus mutans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 2187–2201. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03887-15 (2016).
Treven, P. Strategies to develop strain-specific PCR based assays for probiotics. Benef. Microbes 6, 887–898. https://doi.org/10.3920/bm2015.0009 (2015).
Azizian, K. et al. Inhibitory effect of isolated Lactobacillus from oral cavity against bacterial Pathogens and its effect on health promotion. ARS Pharmaceutica (Internet) 60, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.30827/ars.v60i1.7943 (2019).
Kang, M.-S., Kim, B.-G., Chung, J., Lee, H.-C. & Oh, J.-S. Inhibitory effect of Weissella cibaria isolates on the production of volatile sulphur compounds. J. Clin. Periodontol. 33, 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00893.x (2006).
Terai, T. et al. Screening of Probiotic Candidates in Human Oral Bacteria for the Prevention of Dental Disease. PLoS One 10, e0128657 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128657
Jordan, H. V., Krasse, B. & Möller, A. A method of sampling human dental plaque for certain “caries-inducing” streptococci. Arch. Oral Biol. 13, 919–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(68)90007-1 (1968).
Poole, L. B., Higuchi, M., Shimada, M., Li Calzi, M. & Kamio, Y. Streptococcus mutans H2O2-forming NADH oxidase is an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase protein. Free Radical Biol. Med. 28, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00218-X (2000).
Pericone, C. D., Park, S., Imlay, J. A. & Weiser, J. N. Factors contributing to hydrogen peroxide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae include pyruvate oxidase (SpxB) and avoidance of the toxic effects of the fenton reaction. J. Bacteriol. 185, 6815–6825. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.23.6815-6825.2003 (2003).
Seki, M., Iida, K.-I., Saito, M., Nakayama, H. & Yoshida, S.-I. Hydrogen peroxide production in Streptococcus pyogenes: Involvement of lactate oxidase and coupling with aerobic utilization of lactate. J. Bacteriol. 186, 2046–2051. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.7.2046-2051.2004 (2004).
Pridmore, R. D., Pittet, A.-C., Praplan, F. & Cavadini, C. Hydrogen peroxide production by Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533 and its role in anti-Salmonella activity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 283, 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01176.x (2008).
Kawasaki, S., Satoh, T., Todoroki, M. & Niimura, Y. b-Type dihydroorotate dehydrogenase is purified as a H2O2-forming NADH oxidase from Bifidobacterium bifidum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02111-08 (2009).
Martín, R. & Suárez, J. E. Biosynthesis and degradation of H2O2 by vaginal lactobacilli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01631-09 (2010).
Singh, A. K., Hertzberger, R. Y. & Knaus, U. G. Hydrogen peroxide production by lactobacilli promotes epithelial restitution during colitis. Redox Biol. 16, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.02.003 (2018).
Hecht, H. J., Erdmann, H., Park, H. J., Sprinzl, M. & Schmid, R. D. Crystal structure of NADH oxidase from Thermus thermophilus. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb1295-1109 (1995).
Hertzberger, R. et al. H2O2 production in species of the Lactobacillus acidophilus Group: A central role for a novel NADH-dependent flavin reductase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 2229–2239. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04272-13 (2014).
Redanz, S. et al. Pyruvate secretion by oral streptococci modulates hydrogen peroxide dependent antagonism. ISME J. 14, 1074–1088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0592-8 (2020).
Sakamoto, M. & Komagata, K. Aerobic growth of and activities of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase in lactic acid bacteria. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 82, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(96)88810-6 (1996).
Park, D.-Y. et al. Whole-Genome Sequence of Limosilactobacillus fermentum Strain DM075, Isolated from the Human Oral Cavity. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 0, e00819–00822 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.00819-22
Barzegari, A. et al. The battle of probiotics and their derivatives against biofilms. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 659–672. https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s232982PMID-32161474 (2020).
Yu, S.-H. et al. Decrease of insoluble glucan formation in Streptococcus mutans by co-cultivation with Enterococcus faecium T7 and glucanase addition. Biotechnol. Lett. 40, 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-017-2478-z (2018).
Tanner, A. C. R. et al. White-spot lesions and gingivitis microbiotas in orthodontic patients. J. Dent. Res. 91, 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512455031 (2012).
Thurnheer, T., Karygianni, L., Flury, M. & Belibasakis, G. N. Fusobacterium species and subspecies differentially affect the composition and architecture of supra- and subgingival biofilms models. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01716 (2019).
Bedran, T. B., Grignon, L., Spolidorio, D. P. & Grenier, D. Subinhibitory concentrations of triclosan promote Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and adherence to oral epithelial cells. PLoS One 9, e89059 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089059
Ridlon, J. M., Kang, D.-J. & Hylemon, P. B. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid Res. 47, 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R500013-JLR200 (2006).
Foley, M. H. et al. Lactobacillus bile salt hydrolase substrate specificity governs bacterial fitness and host colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2017709118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017709118
Khodakivskyi, P. V. et al. Noninvasive imaging and quantification of bile salt hydrolase activity: From bacteria to humans. Sci. Adv. 7, eaaz9857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9857
Begley, M., Hill, C. & Gahan, C. G. M. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 1729–1738. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.3.1729-1738.2006 (2006).
Tatusova, T. et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucl. Acids Res. 44, 6614–6624. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw569 (2016).
Jones, B. V., Begley, M., Hill, C., Gahan, C. G. M. & Marchesi, J. R. Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 13580–13585. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804437105 (2008).
Vitetta, L., Coulson, S., Thomsen, M., Nguyen, T. & Hall, S. Probiotics, D-Lactic acidosis, oxidative stress and strain specificity. Gut Microbes 8, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2017.1279379 (2017).
Song, K.-Y. Preliminary data on the ratio of D(–)-lactate and L(+)-lactate levels in various lactic acid bacteria as evaluated using an enzymatic method. J. Dairy Sci. Biotechnol. 40, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.22424/jdsb.2022.40.1.15 (2022).
Muñoz, J. A. M. et al. Novel Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis CECT 7210 Strain Active against Rotavirus Infections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 8775–8783 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05548-11
Eschenbach, D. A. et al. Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27, 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.27.2.251-256.1989 (1989).
Ren, D. et al. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus adherence to Caco-2 cells by lactobacilli and cell surface properties that influence attachment. Anaerobe 18, 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.08.001 (2012).
Backlund, C. J., Worley, B. V. & Schoenfisch, M. H. Anti-biofilm action of nitric oxide-releasing alkyl-modified poly(amidoamine) dendrimers against Streptococcus mutans. Acta Biomater. 29, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.021 (2016).
Crabbé, A. et al. Antimicrobial efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation in a three-dimensional lung epithelial model and the influence of fetal bovine serum. Sci. Rep. 7, 43321. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43321 (2017).
ISO. Milk and Milk Products-Determination of the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Antibiotics Applicable to Bifidobacteria and Non-Enterococcal Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB). ISO 10932:2010 (IDF 223:2010) (2010).
Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F. & Bork, P. ETE 3: Reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw046 (2016).
Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010 (2010).
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P. & Göker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 10, 2182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 (2019).
Lefort, V., Desper, R. & Gascuel, O. FastME 2.0: A comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2798–2800. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv150 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by DOCSmedi Co., Ltd., the Apple Tree Medical Foundation, and the Korea Biobank Network Program run by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KBN4-A04-03). We thank Su Hyun Kim and Jae-Eun Sin for their contribution to the collection and biobanking of biospecimens.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.-Y.P. and I.H. developed the project, designed experiments, evaluated the data, and drafted the manuscript. D.-Y.P. and J.H. conducted microbial experiments and analysed data. Y.K. designed and performed periodontal evaluation and biospecimen collection. D.L., Y.-Y.K., and H.-S.K. provided clinical resources and critical comments. I.H. supervised the project and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors discussed drafts and approved the final manuscript for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
D.-Y.P., J.H., and I.H. are employees of DOSCmedi. Y.J.K., D.L., and Y.-Y.K. are employees of the Apple Tree Medical Foundation. D.L., Y.-Y.K., and H.-S.K. own DOCSmedi stock. I.H. has options to purchase DOCSmedi stock. D.-Y.P., J.H., Y.J.K., I.H., and H.-S.K are inventors on a pending patent entitles “Novel Limosilactobacillus fermentum DM072, and composition for antibacterial use and preventing or treating dental caries composing the same” (10-2022-0052985, filed on 26 May 2022).
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, DY., Hwang, J., Kim, Y. et al. Antimicrobial activity of Limosilactobacillus fermentum strains isolated from the human oral cavity against Streptococcus mutans. Sci Rep 13, 7969 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35168-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35168-7
- Springer Nature Limited