Abstract
Methazolamide is a carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitor with satisfactory safety. Our previous studies have demonstrated the elevation of CA1 expression and the therapeutic effect of Methazolamide in Ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In this study, we explored the pathogenic role of CA1 and the pharmacological mechanism of Methazolamide in AS through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and network pharmacology. Seven out of twelve CA1 related gene sets were enriched in AS group. CA1 was core enriched in above seven gene sets involving zinc ion binding, arylesterase activity and one carbon metabolic process. Functional analysis of the candidate target genes obtained from the intersection of AS associated genes and Methazolamide target genes indicated that Methazolamide exerts therapeutic effects on AS mainly through inflammatory pathways which regulate the production of tumor necrosis factor, IL-6 and nitric oxide. PTGS2, ESR1, GSK3β, JAK2, NOS2 and CA1 were selected as therapeutic targets of Methazolamide in AS. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed successfully. In addition, we innovatively obtained the intersection of Gene Ontology (GO)/Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses and GSEA results, and found that 18 GO terms and 5 KEGG terms were indicated in the pharmacological mechanism of Methazolamide in AS, involving bone mineralization, angiogenesis, inflammation, and chemokine signaling pathways. Nevertheless, validation for these mechanisms is needed in vivo/vitro experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is considered as a chronic inflammatory disorder that mainly affects the axial skeleton1, and leads to the bony fusion of vertebral joints in its late stage2. Patients with AS usually need arthroplasty in their end stage3,4. Clinical manifestations of AS include inflammatory back pain, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and involvement of specific organs accompanied with HLA-B27 positivity in majority patients4,5. Inflammatory and autoimmune pathways are mainly involved in the pathogenesis of AS6. However, common pharmacological treatments for AS, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, analgesics, topical glucocorticoids, and biologics such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and interleukin-17 (IL-17) /IL-23 monoclonal antibodies, only alleviated inflammation but showed limited effect on retarding radiological progression of AS7,8,9,10. In addition, these treatments are associated with heavy economic burden and many adverse effects such as infection, osteoporosis and cardiovascular or gastrointestinal effects after long-term application11,12.
Apart from inflammation, ectopic new bone formation is another pathological feature of AS13, which leads to the bony fusion of vertebral joints in an extreme form. Recent studies have demonstrated the role of classical osteogenic pathways including Wnt/β-catenin signalling14,15, BMP/Smads signalling16,17 and hedgehog signalling18,19 in ectopic new bone formation at the late stage of AS. However, therapeutic treatment focusing on new bone formation is still lacking. Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are a large family of zinc metalloenzymes which catalyze the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide. CA1 participates in the formation of calcium carbonate20, and leads to abnormal bone mineralization and ossification by competitively decreasing the production of hydroxyapatite21,22. Furthermore, the obvious higher arthritic score, thicker hind paws and more proportion of collagen II induced arthritis were observed by Zheng Y and his colleagues in transgenic mice over-expressing CA123. In our previous study, we have found a significant elevation of CA1 expression in the synovium of AS patients compared with the samples of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients24, which indicated that CA1 participated in the unique pathogenic mechanism of AS. In addition, we have confirmed that Methazolamide, a CA inhibitor, could ameliorate both Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) assessments of AS patients with satisfactory safety. Methazolamide also contributed to the clearer articular surfaces of sacroiliac joints in AS patients25. Therefore, we speculated that CA1 may be a novel pathogenic factor in AS, and Methazolamide exhibited a safe and effective therapeutic performance in AS patients.
In order to further explore the pharmacological mechanism of Methazolamide and the pathogenic mechanisms of CA1 in AS, we used network pharmacology and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) in this study.
Materials and methods
Identification of AS associated genes and Methazolamide target genes
We searched GeneCards database (https://www.genecards.org)26, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (OMIM, https://www.omim.org)27 and Therapeutic target database (TTD, http://db.idrblab.net/ttd/)28 for genes with specific query terms “Ankylosing spondylitis”. The union of OMIM genes, TTD genes and the highest quartile of genes obtained from GeneCards was selected as AS associated genes. Human target genes of Methazolamide were obtained from the union of SwissTargetPrediction database (http://www.swisstargetprediction.ch)29 and TargetNet database (http://targetnet.scbdd.com)30. The Methazolamide target genes were filtered by studies performed in Homo sapiens. We took the intersection of AS associated genes and Methazolamide target genes by Venny 2.1 (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html) and got the candidate target genes of Methazolamide in AS.
Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network construction
Based on the identified candidate target genes, PPI networks were constructed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes Database (STRING)31 (https://cn.string-db.org/) and visualized by Cytoscape software (version 3.7.2)32. Because of the limited number of candidate target genes, confidence scores were set to low values in order to include more genes (like CA1) in the network (confidence scores > 0.15). CytoHubba, a plug-in for Cytoscape software that measures nodes according to topologic analysis and therefore allows exploring important nodes in biological networks33, was used to identify hub genes. Since the amount of candidate target genes was relatively small, we selected the top 5 hub genes and CA1 for following molecular docking.
Functional annotation and pathway enrichment analysis
To further reveal the functions of candidate target genes, Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of candidate target genes were performed using the ‘cluster profiler’ package in R software34. GO terms consist of the following three components: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF). GO functional enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment of the significant module were conducted using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) 6.835 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) online tool. A P value < 0.05 was set as the cutoff criterion. And bubble plot of KEGG results was illustrated by ggplot2 and Hmisc packages in R.
Prediction of binding models between Methazolamide and candidate target proteins
The 3D structure of Methazolamide was downloaded from Pubchem website (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)36, and was convert to a file with pdbqt type using Open Babel (version 2.4.0)37 and PyMOL (version 2.5). The crystal structures of target proteins (PTGS2 (PDB:5F1A), ESR1 (PDB:1X7E), GSK3β (PDB:1Q3W), JAK2 (PDB:3KRR), NOS2 (PDB:4CX7) and CA1 (PDB:3LXE)) were downloaded from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/)38 and were modified using PyMOL and Autodock 4.2 software39 to remove ligands and water, and add hydrogen and charges. Molecular docking was performed using Autodock Vina (version 1.2.0)40. The best docking models were recognized with the highest affinity and the smallest root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the predicted conformation and the observed X-ray crystallographic conformation. Models with RMSD ≤ 4 Å were considered reliable and those with RMSD ≤ 2 Å were considered accurate41. Finally, the docking complex was analyzed using Protein–Ligand Interaction Profiler (https://plip-tool.biotec.tu-dresden.de/plip-web/plip/index)42 and visualized using PyMOL.
Re-docking for docking validation
The docking protocol was validated by re-docking process. We firstly removed the protein’s co-crystallized ligand (PDB ID: 5F1A). Then the ligand was re-docked into the same place after being added hydrogen and computed gasteiger through Autodock vina. The RMSD was calculated in PYMOL between the co-crystallized ligand and the lowest energy posture achieved by re-docking. The re-docking operation was considered reliable when the RMSD was within the trusted range of 2 Å43.
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations
For the evaluation of the vibrant binding behavior and binding consistency of protein–ligand complexes in various docked poses, a 100 ns of MD simulation was conducted on GROMACS(2022.1)44. The procedure was carried out under constant temperature, constant pressure, and periodic boundary conditions. The proteins were placed in the Amber14SB all-atom force field45, while the ligand was placed in the GAFF small molecule force field based on Amber and TIP3P water model46. During MD simulation, all bonds involving hydrogen atom were constrained by the LINCS algorithm47, with an integration step of 2 fs. The electrostatic interaction was calculated by the Particle mesh Ewald (PME) method48. The cut off value of non-bonded interaction was set as 10 Å. The simulated temperature was controlled at 298.15 K by the V-rescale49 coupling temperature method. The pressure was controlled at 1 atm by the Parrinello-Rahman method50. Firstly, in order to eliminate the close contact between atoms, the steepest descent method was used to minimize the energy of the two systems. Then, molecular simulation was executed at 298.15 K temperature and 1 atm pressure over a 500 ps NVT and NPT production run respectively. Finally, the simulation was extended to 100 ns for all the complexes to analyze their behavior in long run. RMSD value and Root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) value were used to analyze the structural changes of complexes. Also, visualization of molecular dynamics simulations can be seen through VMD51.
GSEA in AS
GSE73754 is the whole blood gene microarray of fifty-two AS patients and twenty healthy controls. Gene expression profiles of GSE73754 were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database52. The normalized original data (see Supplementary Spreadsheets S1 online) was confirmed by the box-plot. The GO and KEGG gene sets associated with CA1 were download from GSEA database (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/)53 for further analysis. Source organism was Homo sapiens, and contributors were Gene Ontology Consortium and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Then the normalized expression data of GSE73754 and CA1 related gene sets were uploaded to GSEA 4.2.3 software for analysis54. The gene sets from GSEA were excluded when their sizes were less than 5 or larger than 2000. Normalized enrichment score (NES) > 1 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25 were applied to evaluate enrichment magnitude and statistical significance, respectively.
We further uploaded the normalized expression data of GSE73754 and whole GO (c5.go.v7.5.1.symbols) and KEGG (c2.cp.kegg.v7.5.1.symbols) gene sets to GSEA 4.2.3 software for analysis, and got the AS associated pathway terms. The key GO and KEGG terms were defined as the intersection of AS associated pathway terms and pathway terms associated with candidate target genes mentioned above. The flowchart was shown in Fig. 1.
Results
The candidate target genes from the intersection of AS associated genes and Methazolamide target genes
For AS associated genes, there were 3 genes in TTD database, and 108 genes in OMIM database. In GeneCards database, the AS associated genes had extremely lower median score (1.03). Considering both accuracy and completeness, we took the highest quartile of genes from GeneCards database which contained 642 results. The union of the above results was obtained, and totally 728 AS associated genes were selected after removing the duplicates (see Supplementary Spreadsheets S2 online).
For Methazolamide target genes, there were 114 genes in TargetNet database and 68 genes in SwissTargetPrediction database. 14 genes in SwissTargetPrediction database were chosen for further analysis since their probability values were larger than 0. Finally, the union of the above results was obtained, and a total of 108 genes were identified as Methazolamide target genes after removing the duplicates (see Supplementary Spreadsheets S3 online).
There were 18 candidate target genes obtained from the intersection of AS associated genes and Methazolamide target genes: CA1, ALPL, CTDSP1, DNMT1, ESR1, GPR35, GSK3β, HNF4A, HTR2A, JAK2, MIF, MMP8, NOS2, PTGS1, PTGS2, RELA, RIPK2 and TLR9.
PPI network of candidate target genes
The PPI network of 18 candidate target genes was gained from STRING (Fig. 2a), including 18 nodes and 75 edges. To explore genes that may play an important role in the pharmacological mechanism of methazolamide in AS, hub genes were identified by CytoHubba. Since biological networks are heterogeneous, multiple topological analysis algorithms (Degree, MCC, MNC and EPC) were used simultaneously to identify hub genes in the PPI network (see Supplementary Spreadsheets S4 online). And the top 10 candidate target genes with degrees larger than the average degree (8.82) were showed in Fig. 2b. The top 6 hub genes from the intersection of four algorithms were selected for further analysis. They are PTGS2, GSK3β, ESR1, JAK2, TLR9, NOS2. Among them, the most significant target against AS was PTGS2 which had the largest values among the four topological algorithms.
GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of candidate target genes
Totally, the candidate target genes were significantly enriched in 79 GO terms and 16 KEGG terms. In biological process, the enrichments were in inflammatory response, positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor production, negative regulation of gene expression, positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic process, and regulation of inflammatory response. In molecular function, the enrichments were in protein homodimerization activity, heme binding, prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase activity, zinc ion binding, and chromatin binding. In cellular component, the enrichments were in cytoplasm, caveola, glutamatergic synapse, nucleoplasm, and plasma membrane (Fig. 3a). In KEGG pathway, the candidate target genes were significantly enriched in prolactin signaling pathway, tuberculosis, leishmaniasis, pathways in cancer and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection (Fig. 3b).
Molecular docking of Methazolamide and target proteins in AS
The top 6 hub genes identified by CytoHubba were PTGS2, GSK3β, ESR1, JAK2, TLR9, NOS2. Since we only found the crystal structure of target protein TLR9 from horse origin, the potential target proteins (PTGS2 (PDB:5F1A), ESR1 (PDB:1X7E), GSK3β (PDB:1Q3W), JAK2 (PDB:3KRR) and NOS2 (PDB:4CX7)) of Methazolamide in AS were selected for molecular docking. In addition, as a CA inhibitor, Methazolamide was also docked to CA1(PDB:3LXE). Molecular docking was performed successfully between Methazolamide and six candidate target proteins (Fig. 4).
All the docking predictions were summarized in Supplementary Table S1 online. For instance, Methazolamide was bound to PTGS2 by hydrophobic interactions with VAL-349 (length 3.76 Å) and LEU-352 (3.55 Å), and through forming hydrogen bonds with ARG-120 (DIST_H-A 2.46 Å) and TYR-355 (2.28 Å). Similarly, Methazolamide was predicted to dock into the binding pocket of CA1 via forming hydrogen bonds with HIS-64 (2.11 Å), HIS-94 (2.16 Å), HIS-96 (2.22 Å), HIS-119 (2.48 Å), THR-199 (2.00 Å) and HIS-200 (2.43 Å).
Re-docking results for docking protocol
The re-docking of the co-crystallized ligand was applied to validate the correctness of docking algorithms. The 3D superimposition of the co-crystallized ligand and the lowest energy posture achieved by re-docking was shown in Fig. 5, and the RMSD is 0.821 Å. This was helpful to test the docking protocol’s validity and accuracy in part.
MD simulations
We chose PTGS2, GSK3β and NOS2 complexes for MD simulations, since they had more interactions with Methazolamide in molecular docking.
RMSD analysis
RMSD revealed the predicted conformational changes from the original structure across the simulation period. The fluctuation of RMSD is also an important indicator to determine whether the simulation is stable or not. The RMSD values for three protein–ligand complexes over simulation time (100 ns) were calculated and shown in Fig. 6a–c, respectively. During the simulation, the protein backbones were found to be consistent. And no abnormal deviations of RMSD were found among all three complexes in comparison to the native structures, which indicated that the ligand molecule can stably bind to the active pocket of the proteins without inducing significant impacts on their spatial structures. More precisely, for PTGS2 complex, the system was equilibrated, and the backbone was stable until the end of simulation. The average RMSD values of PTGS2, ligand A and ligand B were 0.138 ± 0.010 nm, 0.107 ± 0.024 nm, and 0.125 ± 0.015 nm respectively. For GSK3β complex, the backbone was also consistent and stable throughout the simulation. The average RMSD values of GSK3β, ligand A and ligand B were 0.179 ± 0.023 nm, 0.121 ± 0.016 nm, and 0.116 ± 0.020 nm respectively. For NOS2 complex, in the case of ligand A, initially the backbone RMSD was consistent until 31 ns; after that, there was a small flip, and then consistency was achieved until the end of simulation. Higher deviation during the above duration might be due to high level of conformational changes. The average RMSD values of NOS2, ligand A and ligand B were 0.197 ± 0.027 nm, 0.133 ± 0.031 nm and 0.098 ± 0.016 nm respectively. Hence, the above observations revealed the stability of three protein–ligand complexes in the dynamic state.
RMSF analysis
RMSF measurements were used to indicate structural stability, atomic mobility, and residue flexibility during the simulation. For PTGS2 complex, estimated RMSF values of the whole structure were less than 0.3 nm (Fig. 6d), indicating high stability of the complex. For GSK3β complex, there was a fluctuation more than 0.3 nm at ASP-87, ARG-111, LYS-113, LYS-255, and SER-426, and the remaining structure was stabled comparatively (Fig. 6e).For NOS2 complex, the most fluctuating atoms were the LYS-66, GLN-413, LYS-479, and HIS-823 with 0.3580, 0.3978, 0.3519, and 0.3504 RMSF, respectively(Fig. 6f). Changes in conformation may be the cause of the deviation. The RMSF results further indicated that the ligand molecule can bind to the active pocket and exist stably in all three protein complexes.
Further verification by GSEA in AS
The GSEA results of CA1 in AS
To further identify the pathogenic role of CA1 in AS, we used GSEA to analyze the validate dataset (GSE73754) from the GEO database. Totally, 11 CA1 associated GO gene sets and 1 CA1 associated KEGG gene set were downloaded for further analysis. The dataset GSE73754 contained 23,396 genes which were available for GSEA. The GSEA results showed that seven out of twelve gene sets were enriched in AS group. In biological process, the enrichment was shown in one carbon metabolic process. In molecular function, the enrichments were shown in zinc ion bind, transition metal ion binding, hydrolase activity acting on ester bonds, arylesterase activity and carbonate dehydratase activity. In KEGG pathway, the enrichment was shown in nitrogen metabolism pathway. The NES and FDR of GSEA results were summarized in Table 1.
CA1 was shown core enrichment in above seven gene sets (Fig. 7).
In addition, CA1 ranked the 101th of 23,396 genes in the AS associated rank ordered gene list (see Supplementary Spreadsheets S5), indicating the critical role of CA1 in the development of AS. Notably, GSEA results also showed that the gene APOBEC3A, which was belonged to the target genes of Methazolamide, ranked the 35th of 23,396 genes in the AS associated rank ordered gene list. However, the role of APOBEC3A in AS is unclear, and further validation is needed.
The intersection of GO/KEGG analyses and GSEA results
To further verify whether the hub candidate genes mentioned above play a critical pathogenic role in AS, we rerunning GSEA with total GO and KEGG gene sets in the validate dataset (GSE73754) from the GEO database. There were 3915 GO gene sets and 102 KEGG gene sets enriched in AS group of GSE73754. All of six hub candidate genes mentioned above were up-regulated in AS group. These GSEA results were further intersected with the significantly enriched GO and KEGG terms of candidate target genes mentioned above. Totally,18 GO terms and 5 KEGG terms were selected, including small cell lung cancer, pathways in cancer, neurotrophin signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathway in KEGG pathway and regulation of synaptic vesicle exocytosis, positive regulation of jnk cascade, dioxygenase activity, response to vitamin d, transcription coactivator binding, bone mineralization, and negative regulation of protein catabolic process in GO terms. These intersected terms represented the specific pharmacological mechanism of Methazolamide in AS. NES and FDR of the intersected terms were summarized in Supplementary Table S2. And the bold black terms with NES > 1 and FDR < 0.25 should be further studied in future.
Discussion
Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease which occurs more frequently among young men and has a hereditary nature1. Until now, the pathogenesis of AS is not completely understood. Previous researches mainly focused on the inflammatory pathways1,4,6. However, we have noticed that the pathophysiological features of AS comprise bone resorption, bone destruction and new bone formation1, and CA1 which was significantly elevated in the synovium of AS patients24 may participate in the aberrant osteogenesis process21,22,23,55. It is well known that a layer of hydroxyapatite was formed on the surface of bioactive glasses upon immersion in simulated body fluids, which simulating the normal physiological bone mineralization. Over-expression of CA1 can produce more calcium carbonate which competitively decrease hydroxyapatite production21,22, inducing aberrant osteogenesis and further aggravating joint inflammation and tissue destruction55.
To explore the specific pathogenic mechanism of CA1 in AS, we chose GSEA for further analysis. The GSEA method derives its power by focusing on gene sets that share common biological function, chromosomal location, or regulation. Compared with single-gene methods, GSEA features a number of advantages such as more reproducible and more interpretable, detecting modest changes in individual genes by boosting the signal-to-noise ratio, and defining functional gene subsets by the leading-edge analysis54.
In the present study, the GSEA results indicated that seven CA1 related gene sets were enriched in AS, including zinc ion binding, arylesterase (ARE) activity and one carbon metabolic process. Systemic use of zinc showed positive impact on cartilage repair of osteoarthritis in in vitro and animal studies56. Furthermore, hypovitaminosis A caused by the low level of zinc dependent hepatic retinol binding protein synthesis can lead to a markedly decreased antioxidant capacity and enhanced eicosanoid production in RA57. Therefore, as a zinc ion binding protein58, CA1 may play a pathogenic role in AS by reducing the concentration of zinc ion59. Decrease in the ARE activity leads to the generation of oxidative stress and may play an important role in the pathogenesis of AS. Moreover, the activity of ARE in patients with AS is strictly correlated with the activity of the inflammatory process60. CA1 may affect the ARE activity by regulating its catalytic enzymes which contain zinc ions61. Therefore, ARE may be a link between CA1 and oxidative stress/inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of AS. The term ‘one-carbon metabolism’ refers to a system of interdependent metabolic pathways that facilitate the transfer of the one-carbon units that are needed for DNA methylation, dTMP synthesis, and purine synthesis62. Recently discovered novel disease pathways in AS included those involving DNA methylation63,64. For example, methylation of the suppression of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS-1) can be detected in serum of HLA-B27 positive AS patients. Moreover, the methylation of SOCS-1 was significantly associated with the severity of patients’ spondylopathy, sacroiliitis and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein65. Therefore, CA1 can regulate AS related gene expression by methylation modification through one-carbon metabolism process. These findings indicated that CA1 is involved in the specific pathogenic mechanism of AS and can be a potential therapeutic target for AS.
Methazolamide is a CA inhibitor. In our previous study, Methazolamide seemed to be a potential therapeutic drug with appropriate validity and safety for AS patients. Considering the interdependence of cellular and molecular participants in biological systems, a drug may have far broader effects than its finite molecular target66. Network pharmacology is the novel, promising, cost-effective drug development approach that encompasses systems biology, network analysis, connectivity, redundancy and pleiotropy67. In this study, we tried to identify the potential therapeutic targets of Methazolamide in AS through network pharmacology.
First, we obtained the candidate target genes from the intersection of AS associated genes and Methazolamide target genes. Functional analysis of the candidate target genes indicated that Methazolamide plays a therapeutic role in AS mainly through the inflammatory pathways which involve the production of TNF, IL-6 and nitric oxide. Next, topological algorithms were used to identify hub genes in the PPI network. We have found that the therapeutic effects of Methazolamide in AS are mediated at least in part via PTGS2, ESR1, GSK3β, JAK2, and NOS2.The roles of these target proteins in AS were discussed as follows.
PTGS2
Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase 2 (PTGS2) is also known as cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Unlike COX-1, PTGS2 is rapidly induced by both inflammatory and mitogenic stimuli, resulting in increased prostaglandin synthesis in inflamed tissues in AS68. NSAIDs are the first-line medication for pain and stiffness in AS patients4 by inhibiting the synthesis of prostaglandins. The interaction between Methazolamide and PTGS2 may imply the analgesic and anti-inflammatory mechanism of Methazolamide in AS.
ESR1
The estrogen receptor α, which plays a key role in reproduction and exerts functions in numerous nonreproductive tissues, is encoded by ESR169. In 2017, Hyemin Jeong et al. reported that estrogen could attenuate the spondylarthritis manifestations of the SKG arthritis model70. Later, they also applied selective estrogen receptor modulator lasofoxifene to suppress joint inflammation and enhance bone mineral density in zymosan-induced SKG mice71. Furthermore, oral estrogen therapy in female patients and human chorionic gonadotrophin injections in male patients with AS could result in a moderate clinical improvement72. The interaction between Methazolamide and ESR1 may imply the estrogen-related therapeutic strategy of Methazolamide in AS.
GSK3β
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3β) is a serine/threonine kinase, which is a negative regulator of glucose homeostasis and a known master regulator for energy metabolism, inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum-stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptotic pathways73. In 2015, Li C et al. reported that miR-29a was significantly down regulated in AS patients. Later, they demonstrated that miR-29a could inhibit TNF-α mediated bone loss mainly by down regulating GSK3β, and promote osteoblast genesis by activating the Wnt/b-catenin pathway74. On the other hand, compared with ligament tissues from femoral neck fracture patients, S-L Tang et al. observed the decreased GSK3β level in AS ligament tissue. The declined level of GSK3β was also reported during the osteogenic differentiation process of ligament fibroblast75. In summary, the interaction between Methazolamide and GSK3β may imply therapeutic effect of Methazolamide associated with bone loss and ligament calcification in AS.
JAK2
The Janus kinases (JAKs) are the non-receptor tyrosine kinase76. JAK2 is the only AS-associated JAK63,77. It was reported that JAK2 was involved in osteoblast differentiation78 and inflammation pathways driven by IL-2379 in AS. In addition, JAK inhibitors have demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with highly active AS80. The interaction between Methazolamide and JAK2 may imply therapeutic effect of Methazolamide through the JAK2 related pathway in AS.
NOS2
NOS2 is the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) which is independent of elevated intracellular Ca2 +81. In 1999, K E Armour et al. have observed the increased NO production in an animal model of inflammation-induced osteoporosis accompanied by activation of iNOS in the bone marrow space82. Later, Dominique Lamarque et al. showed that iNOS activity in duodenum and colon, as well as expression of iNOS protein in lamina propria inflammatory cells, were increased in AS patients compared to controls83. Recently, the relationship between NOS2 and AS patients with acute anterior uveitis was confirmed in a genomewide association study84. The interaction between Methazolamide and NOS2 may imply NO related anti-inflammatory mechanism of Methazolamide in AS.
Notably, we innovatively intersected the KEGG and GO terms of target genes with the GSEA results of validate dataset (GSE73754) in this study. This method may do favor to elucidate the therapeutic mechanisms of Methazolamide in treating AS more precisely under the guidance of NES and FDR in GSEA. In Supplementary Table S2, the enriched RELA-PTGS2/NOS2 axis contributes to angiogenesis in KEGG small cell lung cancer pathway85 (see Supplementary Fig. S1), implying that Methazolamide may inhibit the progression of AS by down-regulating the angiogenesis process86. Similarly, Methazolamide may relieve inflammation and ossification by targeting the intersect genes (GSK3β, JAK2, RELA)75,78 in KEGG chemokine signaling pathway85 (see Supplementary Fig. S2). In biological process, Methazolamide may reduce the ossification of AS patients via targeting ALPL and PTGS2 in bone mineralization process.
Molecular docking between the target proteins and Methazolamide were conducted successfully. Molecular dynamics simulations have become a standard tool for the investigation of biomolecules to assess stability and flexibility. Simulations are performed of ever bigger systems using more realistic boundary conditions and better sampling due to longer sampling times to ensure the reliability of molecular docking87,88,89. In this study, re-docking and molecular dynamics simulations were completed to ensure the reliability of molecular docking.
This study explored the pathogenic role of CA1 and the therapeutic mechanism of Methazolamide in AS through the bioinformatics and Network Pharmacological Analysis. Meanwhile, the validate dataset from the GEO database was used to further confirm the therapeutic mechanism of Methazolamide in AS. Nevertheless, in vivo/vitro experiments are still needed to validate these mechanisms and provide more therapeutic targets in AS.
Conclusion
In summary, CA1 is involved in the specific pathogenic mechanism of AS via one carbon metabolic process, zinc ion bind, transition metal ion binding, hydrolase activity acting on ester bonds, arylesterase activity, carbonate dehydratase activity and nitrogen metabolism pathways. In addition, Methazolamide is reasonable to be the promising drug for treating AS. As a CA inhibitor, Methazolamide may exert therapeutic effects on AS mainly through inflammatory pathways which regulate the production of TNF, IL-6 and nitric oxide. PTGS2, ESR1, GSK3β, JAK2, NOS2 and CA1 were selected as therapeutic targets of Methazolamide in AS. Furthermore, we innovatively intersected the GO/KEGG analyses of target genes with the GSEA results of validate dataset, and found that 18 GO terms and 5 KEGG terms were indicated in the pharmacological mechanism of Methazolamide in AS, involving bone mineralization, angiogenesis, inflammation, and chemokine signaling pathways.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed for this study can be found in the NCBI GEO repository https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE7375452.
References
Braun, J. & Sieper, J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 369, 1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60635-7 (2007).
Lai, S. W., Kuo, Y. H. & Liao, K. F. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 80, e144. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216362 (2021).
Bukowski, B. R. et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J. Arthroplasty 36, S282–S289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.054 (2021).
Taurog, J. D., Chhabra, A. & Colbert, R. A. Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 2563–2574. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1406182 (2016).
Mansour, M. et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: A contemporary perspective on diagnosis and treatment. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 36, 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2006.08.003 (2007).
Mauro, D. et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: An autoimmune or autoinflammatory disease?. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 17, 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-021-00625-y (2021).
van der Heijde, D. et al. Modified stoke ankylosing spondylitis spinal score as an outcome measure to assess the impact of treatment on structural progression in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58, 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key128 (2019).
Mease, P. Ustekinumab fails to show efficacy in a phase III axial spondyloarthritis program: The importance of negative results. Arthritis Rheumatol. 71, 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40759 (2019).
Baeten, D. et al. Secukinumab, an interleukin-17A inhibitor, ankylosing spondylitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 2534–2548. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505066 (2015).
Ward, M. M. et al. American College of Rheumatology/spondylitis association of America/Spondyloarthritis research and treatment network 2015 recommendations for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 68, 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39298 (2016).
Essers, I. et al. Ankylosing spondylitis and risk of ischaemic heart disease: A population-based cohort study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 75, 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206147 (2016).
Ward, M. M. & Kuzis, S. Medication toxicity among patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 47, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10399 (2002).
de Vlam, K., Lories, R. J. & Luyten, F. P. Mechanisms of pathologic new bone formation. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 8, 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-006-0061-z (2006).
Zhou, Y., Wang, T., Hamilton, J. L. & Chen, D. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in osteoarthritis and in other forms of arthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 19, 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-017-0679-z (2017).
Corr, M. Wnt signaling in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin. Rheumatol. 33, 759–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2663-6 (2014).
Wu, M., Chen, G. & Li, Y. P. TGF-beta and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res. 4, 16009. https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2016.9 (2016).
Shao, F. et al. Targeting chondrocytes for arresting bony fusion in ankylosing spondylitis. Nat. Commun. 12, 6540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26750-6 (2021).
Ohba, S. Hedgehog signaling in endochondral ossification. J. Dev. Biol. 4, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb4020020 (2016).
Deng, Q. et al. Activation of hedgehog signaling in mesenchymal stem cells induces cartilage and bone tumor formation via Wnt/beta-Catenin. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50208 (2019).
Supuran, C. T. Carbonic anhydrases: Novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2467 (2008).
Mozafari, M., Banijamali, S., Baino, F., Kargozar, S. & Hill, R. G. Calcium carbonate: Adored and ignored in bioactivity assessment. Acta Biomater. 91, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.039 (2019).
Sovova, S., Abalymov, A., Pekar, M., Skirtach, A. G. & Parakhonskiy, B. Calcium carbonate particles: Synthesis, temperature and time influence on the size, shape, phase, and their impact on cell hydroxyapatite formation. J. Mater. Chem. B 9, 8308–8320. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb01072g (2021).
Zheng, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, W., Xu, H. & Chang, X. Transgenic mice over-expressing carbonic anhydrase I showed aggravated joint inflammation and tissue destruction. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 13, 256. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-256 (2012).
Chang, X. et al. Increased expression of carbonic anhydrase I in the synovium of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 11, 279. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-279 (2010).
Chang, X., Yan, X. & Zhang, Y. Treat ankylosing spondylitis with methazolamide. Int. J. Med. Sci. 8, 413–419. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.8.413 (2011).
Stelzer, G. et al. The GeneCards suite: From gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 54, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.5 (2016).
Amberger, J. S., Bocchini, C. A., Schiettecatte, F., Scott, A. F. & Hamosh, A. OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM(R)), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D789-798. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1205 (2015).
Zhou, Y. et al. Therapeutic target database update 2022: Facilitating drug discovery with enriched comparative data of targeted agents. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D1398–D1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab953 (2022).
Daina, A., Michielin, O. & Zoete, V. SwissTargetPrediction: Updated data and new features for efficient prediction of protein targets of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W357–W364. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz382 (2019).
Yao, Z. J. et al. TargetNet: A web service for predicting potential drug-target interaction profiling via multi-target SAR models. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 30, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-9915-2 (2016).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2021: Customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D605–D612. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 (2021).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303 (2003).
Chin, C. H. et al. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst. Biol. 8(4), S11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11 (2014).
Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118 (2012).
da Huang, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211 (2009).
Kim, S. et al. PubChem in 2021: New data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1388–D1395. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa971 (2021).
O’Boyle, N. M. et al. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform. 3, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 (2011).
Berman, H. M. et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235 (2000).
Morris, G. M. et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2785–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256 (2009).
Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334 (2010).
Rayan, A. New tips for structure prediction by comparative modeling. Bioinformation 3, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630003263 (2009).
Adasme, M. F. et al. PLIP 2021: Expanding the scope of the protein-ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W530–W534. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab294 (2021).
Onodera, K., Satou, K. & Hirota, H. Evaluations of molecular docking programs for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model 47, 1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci7000378 (2007).
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 (2015).
Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: Improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 (2015).
Jorgensen, W. L. et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).
Hess, B. P-LINCS: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700200b (2008).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald-an N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1992).
Berendsen, H. J. et al. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).
Martonak, R., Laio, A. & Parrinello, M. Predicting crystal structures: The Parrinello-Rahman method revisited. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 075503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.075503 (2003).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph 14(33–38), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 (1996).
Barrett, T. et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D991-995. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1193 (2013).
Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004 (2015).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 15545–15550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102 (2005).
Chang, X. et al. Carbonic anhydrase I (CA1) is involved in the process of bone formation and is susceptible to ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 14, R176. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3929 (2012).
Apostu, D. et al. Systemic drugs with impact on osteoarthritis. Drug Metab. Rev. 51, 498–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2019.1687511 (2019).
Abdu-Gusau, K., Elegbede, J. A. & Akanya, H. O. Serum zinc, retinol and retinol-binding protein levels in cirrhotics with hypogonadism. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 43, 53–57 (1989).
Yang, X. et al. Serum quantitative proteomic analysis reveals potential zinc-associated biomarkers for nonbacterial prostatitis. Prostate 75, 1538–1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.23028 (2015).
Kloubert, V. & Rink, L. Zinc as a micronutrient and its preventive role of oxidative damage in cells. Food Funct. 6, 3195–3204. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fo00630a (2015).
Olama, S. M. & Elarman, M. M. Evaluation of paraoxonase and arylesterase activities in Egyptian patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol. Int. 33, 1487–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2591-1 (2013).
Bora, R. P., Mills, M. J., Frushicheva, M. P. & Warshel, A. On the challenge of exploring the evolutionary trajectory from phosphotriesterase to arylesterase using computer simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 3434–3445. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5124025 (2015).
Stover, P. J. One-carbon metabolism-genome interactions in folate-associated pathologies. J. Nutr. 139, 2402–2405. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.113670 (2009).
Hanson, A. & Brown, M. A. Genetics and the causes of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 43, 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2017.04.006 (2017).
Yang, H. et al. Epigenetics of ankylosing spondylitis: Recent developments. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 24, 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14080 (2021).
Lai, N. S. et al. Association between cytokines and methylation of SOCS-1 in serum of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 41, 3773–3780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3242-2 (2014).
Moodley, D. et al. Network pharmacology of JAK inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 9852–9857. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610253113 (2016).
Hopkins, A. L. Network pharmacology: The next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.118 (2008).
Dannenberg, A. J., Lippman, S. M., Mann, J. R., Subbaramaiah, K. & DuBois, R. N. Cyclooxygenase-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor: Pharmacologic targets for chemoprevention. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.09.112 (2005).
Arnal, J. F. et al. Membrane and nuclear estrogen receptor alpha actions: From tissue specificity to medical implications. Physiol. Rev. 97, 1045–1087. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00024.2016 (2017).
Jeong, H. et al. Estrogen attenuates the spondyloarthritis manifestations of the SKG arthritis model. Arthritis Res. Ther. 19, 198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1407-9 (2017).
Jeong, H. et al. Selective estrogen receptor modulator lasofoxifene suppresses spondyloarthritis manifestation and affects characteristics of gut microbiota in zymosan-induced SKG mice. Sci. Rep. 11, 11923. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91320-1 (2021).
Giltay, E. J., van Schaardenburg, D., Gooren, L. J., Popp-Snijders, C. & Dijkmans, B. A. Androgens and ankylosing spondylitis: a role in the pathogenesis?. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 876, 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07658.x (1999).
Wang, H., Kumar, A., Lamont, R. J. & Scott, D. A. GSK3beta and the control of infectious bacterial diseases. Trends Microbiol. 22, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.01.009 (2014).
Li, C., Zhang, P. & Gu, J. miR-29a modulates tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced osteogenic inhibition by targeting Wnt antagonists. Dev. Growth Differ. 57, 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/dgd.12207 (2015).
Tang, S. L., Huang, Q. H., Wu, L. G., Liu, C. & Cai, A. L. MiR-124 regulates osteoblast differentiation through GSK-3beta in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 22, 6616–6624. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201810_16136 (2018).
Yamaoka, K. et al. The Janus kinases (Jaks). Genome Biol. 5, 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-253 (2004).
Ellinghaus, D. et al. Analysis of five chronic inflammatory diseases identifies 27 new associations and highlights disease-specific patterns at shared loci. Nat. Genet. 48, 510–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3528 (2016).
Jo, S. et al. IL-17A induces osteoblast differentiation by activating JAK2/STAT3 in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 20, 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1582-3 (2018).
Vecellio, M., Cohen, C. J., Roberts, A. R., Wordsworth, P. B. & Kenna, T. J. RUNX3 and T-bet in immunopathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis-novel targets for therapy?. Front. Immunol. 9, 3132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03132 (2018).
Nash, P. et al. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: A consensus statement. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 80, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218398 (2021).
MacMicking, J., Xie, Q. W. & Nathan, C. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.323 (1997).
Armour, K. E., Van, T. H. R. J., Grabowski, P. S., Reid, D. M. & Ralston, S. H. Evidence for a pathogenic role of nitric oxide in inflammation-induced osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 2137–2142. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.12.2137 (1999).
Lamarque, D. et al. Lymphocytic infiltration and expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in human duodenal and colonic mucosa is a characteristic feature of ankylosing spondylitis. J. Rheumatol. 30, 2428–2436 (2003).
Huang, X. F. et al. Genomewide association study of acute anterior uveitis identifies new susceptibility loci. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61, 3. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.6.3 (2020).
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000).
Ma, M. et al. ATF6 aggravates angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling during ankylosing spondylitis by mediating FGF2 expression in chondrocytes. iScience 24, 102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102791 (2021).
Hansson, T., Oostenbrink, C. & Gunsteren, W. V. Molecular dynamics simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00308-1 (2002).
Hosen, M. A. et al. A computational investigation of galactopyranoside esters as antimicrobial agents through antiviral, molecular docking, molecular dynamics, pharmacokinetics, and bioactivity prediction. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2023.2198606 (2023).
Rehman, H. M. et al. Identification of NS2B-NS3 protease inhibitors for therapeutic application in ZIKV infection: A pharmacophore-based high-throughput virtual screening and MD simulations approaches. Vaccines (Basel) 11, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010131 (2023).
Funding
This work was supported by the Cultivated National Natural Science Foundation Project of Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital under Grant [number QYPY2020NSFC0617] in analysis of data and writing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.F.Y. designed the work; T.S., M.Z.W. and W.Q.L. collected data from the public datasets; T.S., P.G. and Q.L. analyzed data; T.S. and M.Z.W. drafted the work; X.F.Y. revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, T., Wang, M., Liang, W. et al. Revealing mechanism of Methazolamide for treatment of ankylosing spondylitis based on network pharmacology and GSEA. Sci Rep 13, 15370 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42721-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42721-x
- Springer Nature Limited