Abstract
Plyometric training boosts adolescents' jumping ability, crucial for athletic success and health. However, the best total ground contact frequency (TGCF) and overall intervention time (OIT) for these exercises remain unclear. This meta-analysis aims to identify optimal TGCF and OIT in plyometric training for adolescents, focusing on countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) outcomes. This systematic review encompassed five databases and included 38 studies with 50 randomized controlled experiments and 3347 participants. We used the Cochrane risk assessment tool for study quality and Review Manager 5.4 for data analysis. The current meta-analysis incorporated a total of 38 studies, comprising 50 sets of randomized controlled trials, to investigate the influence of different TGCFs and OITs on plyometric training. The Cochrane risk assessment tool indicated that all the included studies were classified as low risk. Various TGCFs in plyometric training positively affected CMJ and SJ heights in adolescents. The TGCF of less than 900 was ideal for enhancing CMJ, whereas more than 1400 was effective for SJ. The optimal OIT was 400–600 min, specifically, 500–600 min for CMJ and 400–500 min for SJ. Plyometric training improves jumping ability in adolescents. Lower ground contact frequency (< 900 contacts) enhances CMJ, while higher ground contact frequency (> 1400 contacts) is more effective for SJ. Optimal intervention time ranges from 400 to 600 min, with 500 to 600 min benefiting CMJ and 400 to 500 min improving SJ.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Jumping ability is a fundamental physical skill that is of great importance to the development of adolescents1,2. In many sports such as basketball, volleyball, high jump, and long jump, good jumping ability is essential for young athletes and is closely related to their performance in these events3. For ordinary adolescents, good jumping ability is also important. Studies have shown that jumping ability is closely related to adolescents' level of physical activity and quality of life4. In addition, physical ability is one of the important factors contributing to adolescents' self-esteem and psychological health5. By participating in jump training, ordinary adolescents can improve their motor skills, enhance their self-confidence, promote physical health, and establish good exercise habits6.
Plyometric training is a commonly used method for physical conditioning7. It has been shown to effectively improve the jumping ability of adolescents8,9,10,11. This effectiveness is due to the effective utilization of both mechanical and neurophysiological models by the plyometric training. The mechanical model suggests that when a muscle is rapidly stretched, elastic potential energy is increased and stored12,13. When the stretched muscle is immediately shortened with a rapid concentric contraction, the stored elastic potential energy is instantly released, thereby increasing the muscle's force output12,13. In the neurophysiological model, the muscle utilizes the principle of the stretch reflex to enhance the force of the concentric contraction14,15,16,17. However, for adolescents, many variables may affect the effectiveness of plyometric training.
Total ground contact frequency (TGCF) and overall intervention time (OIT) appear to be two key variables that affect the effectiveness of plyometric training. TGCF refers to the number of ground contacts made by an athlete during a complete plyometric training period18. OIT refers to the total duration of plyometric training performed by an athlete during a training period19. Both of these variables are both crucial factors that impact training effectiveness and sport performance.20. This is attributed to the fact that higher TGCF and OIT generally indicate a greater training intensity, which can help improve muscle contraction speed and strength, thereby enhancing athletic performance20. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to determine the optimal range of TGCF for improving jumping ability in adolescents, and there is a lack of recommendations for the OIT of plyometric training for adolescents.
Given the importance of jumping ability in adolescents and the relationship between TGCF and OIT of plyometric training with training effectiveness and athletic performance, it is particularly important to explore the appropriate TGCF and reasonable OIT for adolescents undergoing plyometric training. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to analyze the optimal values of total TGCT and OIT for enhancing jumping ability, specifically countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) in adolescents. By addressing the current lack of specific guidance regarding TGCT and OIT, the present review endeavors to provide valuable recommendations and guidance in the field of plyometric training for adolescents.
Information and research methods
The present systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023446372).
Search strategy
The present systematic review and meta-analysis conducted searches in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The search process is illustrated in Fig. 1 (PubMed was used as an example). The search time frame extended from the beginning of records in each database to February 6th, 2023. To ensure the accuracy of the search, two researchers (D.L and L.C) cross-checked the search keywords. If there were any disagreements on keyword selection between the two researchers, a third researcher (Z.H) would make the final decision. If necessary, manual searches would be conducted to supplement the literature.
Study selection
The literature inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis were based on the participants, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study (PICOS) format of evidence-based medicine.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the study participants were adolescents aged 10–19 years21; (2) the experimental group underwent plyometric training as an intervention, followed by their participation in specialized training (such as football, basketball, volleyball, etc.) or regular physical education classes, which were identical to those provided to the control group. The control group did not receive the intervention of plyometric training but engaged in activities similar to the experimental group, including specialized training or regular physical education classes; (3) the control group served as a blank control, receiving no intervention of plyometric training, but participating solely in specialized training or regular physical education classes; (4) all studies were conducted on rigid ground to avoid interference from different training surfaces; (5) the outcome measures were jump performance indicators, including CMJ and SJ; (6) all studies should include one of the following variables: TGCF or OIT; (7) the study design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) non-randomized controlled trials, self-controlled trials, and randomized crossover trials; (2) inability to obtain study data; (3) conference papers, reviews, and comments; (4) unable to obtain full-text articles; (5) outside the age range of adolescents.
A total of 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. The detailed inclusion and exclusion process is shown in the figure below (Fig. 2).
Data extraction
To avoid duplications, all literature from the various databases was imported into the EndnoteX9 software for deduplication. After confirming all the final literature included in the analysis, two researchers (C.L and H.Z) extracted the data into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The extracted data included author’s name, publication year, characteristics of the subjects (such as age or maturation stage, gender, sample size), pre- and post-test data for the included indicators, training program details (such as TGCF, OIT, intervention period, training frequency, intervention methods for the experimental and control groups). If there were any discrepancies in the data extracted by the two researchers, a third researcher (Z.M) would extract and confirm the data. All pre- and post-test data were included in the analysis as mean ± standard deviation and were converted into change values ± standard deviation by one researcher (C.L) before being ultimately included in the analysis. If the full text or study data were unavailable, the corresponding author was contacted to obtain the relevant information.
Assessment of risk of bias
The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of all included studies, and each criterion was assessed as "low risk of bias," "unknown risk of bias," or "high risk of bias." The studies were classified into A, B, or C quality levels based on the number of "low risk of bias" criteria met: A level for four or more, B level for two to three, and C level for one or none8. Two researchers (C.L and H.Z) independently assessed the quality of all studies included in this meta-analysis.
Statistical analysis
The data analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 5.4 software (Review Manager, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). To ensure the objectivity and persuasiveness of the study, the present meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted with data from no less than two groups22. All units of measurement were converted to a common unit (e.g., all units of length were converted to centimeters). Therefore, the weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval was used as the overall effect size indicator in the final analysis. The heterogeneity index I2 was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the studies. I2 values lower than 25%, between 25 and 75%, and higher than 75% are considered to have negligible, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively23. If the heterogeneity of the studies was less than 25%, a fixed-effect model was used for outcome indicator analysis. If the heterogeneity was greater than 25%, a random-effect model was used for outcome indicator analysis8. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Since there are currently no studies that classify different TGCF, this study used an artificial classification method to present the research results more persuasively. The aim was to ensure that each subgroup contained a comparable number of studies, thereby increasing the comparability and persuasiveness among the subgroups. Specifically, different TGCFs were divided into three groups: low ground contact frequency (LGCF), medium ground contact frequency (MGCF), and high ground contact frequency (HGCF). LGCF included experiments with a TGCF of less than 900, MGCF included experiments with a TGCF between 900 and 1400, and HGCF included experiments with a TGCF greater than 1400. In addition, OIT was classified by every 100 min as a subgroup, for example, 200–300 min as a subgroup. This finer classification aimed to provide a more detailed analysis. If the number of articles in each subgroup was less than 2, the subgroup would be canceled and not included in the analysis.
Ethics approval
The study has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023446372).
Results
Study characteristics
According to the PRISMA reporting guidelines, 38 studies comprising 50 experimental groups were included in this meta-analysis. The studies involved 3347 adolescent participants aged 10–19 years, including those with specialized training and those without. The intervention in the experimental group was a plyometric training, while the control group received only specialized training without any other training intervention. The majority of the studies had an intervention time of 20–40 min, an intervention period of 6–10 weeks, and an intervention frequency of twice a week (Table 1).
Risk of bias in the included articles
The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the quality of all the literature included in this meta-analysis. All the studies included in this analysis were randomized controlled trials, with 8 studies reporting allocation concealment and 6 studies implementing blinding of the researchers and participants. All the studies included in this meta-analysis were rated as low risk of bias (Fig. 3).
Meta-analysis results
The impact of plyometric training with varying ground contact frequencies on jumping ability in adolescents
A total of 28 studies comprising 36 experimental groups and 982 participants were included in this meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of plyometric training with varying ground contact frequencies on CMJ height in adolescents (Fig. 4). The overall effect size showed a significant positive effect of plyometric training on CMJ height in adolescents [MD = 2.62, 95% CI (1.99, 3.25)], with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 32%) and statistical significance (P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that plyometric training with different TGCFs had a positive effect on CMJ height in adolescents, including LGCF [MD = 2.77, 95% CI (1.21, 4.32), P < 0.01, I2 = 72%], MGCF [MD = 2.50, 95% CI (1.53, 3.48), P < 0.01, I2 = 0%’], and HGCF [MD = 2.40, 95% CI (1.60, 3.20), P < 0.01, I2 = 0%].
A total of 14 studies comprising 19 experimental groups and 537 participants were included in this meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of plyometric training with varying ground contact frequencies on SJ height in adolescents (Fig. 5). The overall effect size showed a significant positive effect of plyometric training on SJ height in adolescents [MD = 2.05, 95% CI (1.48, 2.62)], with no heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0%) and statistical significance (P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that plyometric training with different TGCFs had a positive effect on SJ height in adolescents, including LGCF [MD = 1.76, 95% CI (0.81, 2.71), P < 0.01, I2 = 37%], MGCF [MD = 2.05, 95% CI (0.63, 3.48), P < 0.01, I2 = 0%], and HGCF [MD = 2.27, 95% CI (1.44, 3.11), P < 0.01, I2 = 11%].
The impact of plyometric training with different OITs on jumping ability in adolescents
A total of 32 studies comprising 41 experimental groups and 1270 participants were included in this meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of plyometric training with different OITs on CMJ height in adolescents (Fig. 6). The results showed that plyometric training with different OITs had a positive effect on CMJ height in adolescents, including OIT 100–200 [MD = 2.49, 95% CI (0.34, 4.65), P = 0.02, I2 = 14%]; OIT 200–300 [MD = 1.39, 95% CI (0.49, 2.30), P < 0.01, I2 = 5%]; OIT 300–400 [MD = 2.54, 95% CI (1.47, 3.62), P < 0.01, I2 = 38%]; OIT 400–500 [MD = 3.17, 95% CI (1.68, 4.66), P < 0.01, I2 = 0%]; OIT 500–600 [MD = 4.48, 95% CI (1.80, 7.15), P < 0.01, I2 = 0%]; OIT 600–700 [MD = 2.55, 95% CI (0.25, 4.85), P = 0.03, I2 = 70%]; and OIT > 700 [MD = 3.77, 95% CI (1.10, 6.43), P < 0.01, I2 = 53%].
A total of 15 studies comprising 19 experimental groups and 556 participants were included in this meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of plyometric training with different OITs on SJ height in adolescents (Fig. 7). The results showed that plyometric training with different OITs had a positive effect on SJ height in adolescents, including OIT 200–300 [MD = 2.71, 95% CI (1.02, 4.41), P < 0.01, I2 = 56%]; OIT 300–400 [MD = 1.56, 95% CI (0.86, 2.26), P < 0.01, I2 = 0%]; OIT 400–500 [MD = 3.82, 95% CI (1.05, 6.59), P < 0.01, I2 = 0%]; OIT 600–700 [MD = 2.89, 95% CI (1.73, 4.06), P < 0.01, I2 = 8%].
Reporting bias
The symmetrical distribution in the funnel plots did not suggest the presence of publication bias (Fig. 8).
Discussion
The relationship between TGCF and jumping performance
The results of the meta-analysis indicate that plyometric training is an effective method for improving jumping performance, which supports the view that plyometric training can improve lower limb explosiveness8,24,25. Subgroup analyses indicate that different TGCTs induce specific adaptations in each type of jump. For the CMJ, it appears that LGCF is more beneficial, followed by MGCF and HGCF. In the case of SJ, HGCF seems to yield better results, followed by MGCF and LGCF. Similar to the results of most meta-analyses on the effects of plyometric training on jumping ability8,9,25,26, this study also found that plyometric training is an effective method for improving jumping performance in adolescents. Mark et al.27 conducted a similar experimental study to this one, where they divided all participants into low, moderate, and high-intensity training groups based on the different ground contact frequencies per week. Their results showed that low-intensity training can achieve similar effects as moderate and high-intensity training in the reactive strength index (RSI) measure. In contrast to Mark et al.27, this study classified the TGCF of the intervention, rather than just the frequency per week, and used CMJ and SJ as outcome measures to investigate the effects of different ground contact frequencies on jumping ability.
The primary reason for the improvement in jumping ability following plyometric training is the enhancement of central nervous system adaptation and muscle strength and explosiveness. Specifically, neural adaptation is characterized by changes in muscle activation strategy, which involve increased activation of agonist muscles and decreased activation of antagonist muscles28, or improvements in muscle excitability resulting from lengthening and shortening29. The improvement in muscle strength and explosiveness is mainly due to changes in muscle structure, such as a reduction in muscle fascicle angle and an increase in muscle fascicle length30,31, and changes in the stiffness of various elastic components, such as the plantar flexor-tendon complex32,33,34,35. These neurophysiological changes can enhance the efficiency of energy storage and release during the stretch–shortening cycle (SSC), ultimately resulting in improved jump performance36.
However, for the results of this meta-analysis, it appears that LGCF can better promote the improvement of CMJ ability in adolescents. Currently, there is not enough evidence to explain this phenomenon, and the physiological mechanisms underlying the effects of plyometric training with different TGCF on CMJ ability are not yet clear. Therefore, the following summarizes the potential mechanisms by which plyometric training with LGCF can better induce improvements in CMJ ability in adolescents:
-
(1)
CMJ is a widely used method for testing lower limb muscle strength and explosiveness, characterized by utilizing the SSC effect during jumping to generate higher jump heights37. The SSC effect not only involves the intrinsic biomechanical mechanisms of muscles but is also closely related to adaptive regulation of the nervous system38. In the SSC process, the muscle can activate more motor units for rapid contraction after being rapidly stretched, requiring the neuromuscular system to respond sensitively and accurately to signals of muscle lengthening39. LGCF may be more conducive to inducing neural adaptation, thereby further enhancing the SSC effect38
-
Adolescents are at a peak period of growth and development, which makes them more susceptible to over-fatigue and sports injuries40. Compared to adults, adolescents have a greater neural load, making it difficult to effectively regulate the SSC process41. Therefore, plyometric training with LGCF can effectively reduce the neural load, promote neural monitoring and control of SSC42,43. Reducing training intensity appropriately can reduce neural fatigue, allowing for greater attention to SSC regulation, thus enhancing neural adaptation44,45.
-
(3)
During high-intensity rapid muscle contractions, a large amount of lactate is produced, leading to muscle soreness and fatigue46. The accumulation of lactate in the muscle can inhibit muscle contraction ability, reducing muscle strength and explosiveness47. In addition, rapid muscle contraction requires a significant amount of energy, including ATP, creatine phosphate, and glycogen, among others. Energy depletion is also an important factor contributing to muscle fatigue47,48,49,50. Therefore, LGCF can reduce muscle lactate accumulation and fatigue, helping athletes maintain stable jumping performance51,52,53.
In contrast to the CMJ indicator, plyometric training with HGCF can better induce improvements in SJ ability. SJ is also a test method for measuring lower limb muscle strength and explosiveness, characterized by involving only concentric force during jumping54,55. More TGCFs in plyometric training can better induce improvements in maximal strength and explosiveness, thereby improving adolescent SJ ability. The following are the related reasons for this phenomenon:
-
(1)
When muscles are stimulated by nerve impulses, the release and reuptake of intracellular calcium ions (Ca2 +) are important regulatory mechanisms for muscle contraction and relaxation56. After extensive training involving repeated contractions and relaxations, the muscle's ability to release and reuptake Ca2 + can be improved. This, in turn, enhances the generation of muscle tension and relaxation speed, and helps the muscle adapt to higher loads and stronger stimuli, thereby enhancing muscle strength and endurance50,57,58,59.
-
(2)
With an increase in training frequency, motor neurons will connect to appropriate muscle fibers more frequently and make the synthesis and release of neurotransmitters more efficient50,60,61,62. This leads to clearer transmission of nerve impulses to the muscles, thus activating more muscle fibers63.
The relationship between OIT and jumping performance
The results of this study indicate that the OIT for plyometric training is more reasonable in the range of 400–600 min for improving the jumping ability of adolescents. Subgroup analysis shows that for the CMJ index, the OIT for plyometric training can achieve the best training effect in the range of 500–600 min. As for the SJ index, the training effect is better with a OIT of 400–500 min.
Despite many meta-analyses on the effect of plyometric training on the jumping ability of adolescents, there has been no study summarizing time recommendations for plyometric training in adolescents8,9,25,26. Therefore, there is currently no clear recommendation for the most suitable OIT for plyometric training in adolescents. Negra et al.64 conducted a similar experimental study to explore the time effect of plyometric training on lower limb explosive power in adolescents with different total training weeks. The research team conducted four tests on the plyometric training group at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12. The results showed that the jumping ability of the plyometric training group improved significantly at week 12. Although Negra et al.64 study compared the training differences of plyometric training with different training weeks, the OIT, i.e. the training time per week and the OIT, was not further refined due to the long time intervals between weeks 4, 8, and 12. Currently, there is no study that categorizes plyometric training with different OITs into levels, so it is unclear how long plyometric training should be considered a short or long OIT for adolescents. Therefore, to further explore the effect of plyometric training with different OITs on the jumping ability of adolescents, this study further subdivided the OIT into subgroups of 100 min each, in order to more accurately investigate the potential relationship between OIT and the jumping ability of adolescents, and to provide more specific training recommendations for actual training.
OIT is one of the important factors affecting the effect of plyometric training. Too long OIT may lead to athlete fatigue, overtraining, sports injuries, and even a decrease in training effect65,66. Conversely, too short OIT may result in poor training effect, failure to fully stimulate athlete potential, and limit the development of athletic performance67. Therefore, a reasonable OIT is crucial for optimizing the training effect, especially for adolescents. The importance of a reasonable OIT is reflected in the following aspects:
-
(1)
A reasonable OIT for plyometric training can provide adolescents with sufficient training volume, which is crucial for the development of the neural and muscular systems and for improving jumping performance. Studies have shown that appropriate training volume can gradually help adolescents adapt to training, enhance the reaction speed and coordination of the neural-muscular system44,68. In terms of the neural system, appropriate training can improve the activation efficiency of motor units and the learning efficiency of movement patterns69. In terms of the muscular system, appropriate training can enhance muscle strength, explosive power, and elasticity, and improve the coordination between the neural and muscular systems44,68. These changes and improvements in the neural and muscular systems can enhance the neural-muscular reaction speed and coordination of adolescents, thereby improving their jumping ability70,71
-
(2)
Plyometric training positively impacts adolescent growth and development. Training duration and intensity play a crucial role in shaping the body and physiological systems72,73. During adolescence, growth hormone levels increase, stimulating the secretion of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). This hormone promotes the growth of bones, muscles, and ligaments74,75. Plyometric training aligns with the body's heightened growth hormone secretion, enhancing explosive power and muscle strength. With appropriate duration, it further stimulates IGF-1 secretion, fostering the healthy development of bones, muscles, and ligaments. This helps adolescents improve bone density and reduce fracture risks76,77,78.
Limitations and future research lines
Limitations
Based on extensive experimental research on plyometric training for adolescents, this study conducted an in-depth statistical analysis of TGCF and OIT involved in plyometric training. However, we must acknowledge that due to the uniqueness of each experiment, we were unable to effectively correlate TGCF and OIT with intervention periods. Additionally, we recognize that the types of training movements have an important impact on training intensity and effects. However, in this study, we failed to quantify the intensity of various training movements involved in plyometric training, which may have affected our comprehensive understanding of the training effects.
Future research lines
Moving forward, we will strive to collect more experimental research related to adolescent plyometric training, particularly studies that closely associate TGCF and OIT, as well as movement intensity, with intervention periods. We hope that through this approach, we can provide more accurate and comprehensive data and conclusions to inform both the theory and practice of plyometric training.
Conclusion and practical applications
In conclusion, plyometric training has been proven effective for enhancing the jumping ability of adolescents. This meta-analysis highlights the importance of two key variables, namely TGCF and OIT, in influencing training outcomes.
The findings suggest that plyometric training with a LGCF (less than 900 contacts) is beneficial for improving CMJ ability in adolescents. On the other hand, plyometric training with a HGCF (more than 1400 contacts) is more effective for enhancing SJ ability. Additionally, the optimal OIT for improving jumping ability through plyometric training is within the range of 400–600 min. Specifically, an OIT of 500–600 min yields the best results for CMJ ability, while a training time of 400–500 min is more ideal for SJ performance.
Based on these findings, the following practical applications can be recommended:
-
(1)
Plyometric training is highly recommended for jump training in adolescents due to its effectiveness in enhancing their jumping ability
-
(2)
The determination of TGCF should be based on the training objectives. To improve CMJ ability, it is recommended to limit the TGCF below 900. For those aiming to improve SJ ability, a TGCF exceeding 1400 can be selected
-
(3)
OIT is a significant factor that affects training outcomes. For optimal improvement in CMJ ability, a total training time of 500–600 min is recommended. On the other hand, for better SJ performance, a training time of 400–500 min is more suitable.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysd during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- SSC:
-
Stretch–shortening cycle
- CMJ:
-
Countermovement jump
- SJ:
-
Squat jump
- RCTs:
-
Randomized controlled trial studies
- PRISMA:
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- WMD:
-
Weighted mean difference
- PT:
-
Plyometric training
- CON:
-
Control group
- PE:
-
Physical education
- PPT:
-
Progressed plyometric training
- NPPT:
-
Non-progressed plyometric training
- Ca2 + :
-
Calcium ions
- TGCF:
-
Total Ground Contact Frequency
- OIT:
-
Overall Intervention Time
- IGF-1:
-
Insulin-like growth factor 1
- LGCF:
-
Low ground contact frequency
- MGCF:
-
Medium ground contact frequency
- HGCF:
-
High ground contact frequency
References
Lloyd, R. S. et al. Long-term athletic development, part 2: Barriers to success and potential solutions. J. Strength Cond. Res. 29(5), 1451–1464 (2015).
Lloyd, R. S., Radnor, J. M., Croix, M. B. D. S., Cronin, J. B. & Oliver, J. L. Changes in sprint and jump performances after traditional, plyometric, and combined resistance training in male youth pre-and post-peak height velocity. J. Strength Cond. Res. 30(5), 1239–1247 (2016).
Lloyd, R. S. et al. National strength and conditioning association position statement on long-term athletic development. J. Strength Cond. Res. 30(6), 1491–1509 (2016).
Crane, J. R., Naylor, P. J., Cook, R. & Temple, V. A. Do perceptions of competence mediate the relationship between fundamental motor skill proficiency and physical activity levels of children in kindergarten?. J. Phys. Act. Health 12(7), 954–961 (2015).
Eime, R. M., Young, J. A., Harvey, J. T., Charity, M. J. & Payne, W. R. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 10(1), 1–21 (2013).
Faigenbaum, A. D. Strength training for children and adolescents. Clin. Sports Med. 19(4), 593–619 (2000).
Vera-Assaoka, T. et al. Effects of maturation on physical fitness adaptations to plyometric drop jump training in male youth soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 34(10), 2760–2768 (2020).
Chen, L. et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of plyometric training on lower limb explosive strength in adolescent athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20(3), 1849 (2023).
De Villarreal, E.S.-S., Requena, B. & Newton, R. U. Does plyometric training improve strength performance? A meta-analysis. J. Sci. Med. Sport 13(5), 513–22 (2010).
De Villarreal, E.S.-S., Kellis, E., Kraemer, W. J. & Izquierdo, M. Determining variables of plyometric training for improving vertical jump height performance: A meta-analysis. J. Strength Cond. Res. 23(2), 495–506 (2009).
Ramírez-Campillo, R. et al. Effect of unilateral, bilateral, and combined plyometric training on explosive and endurance performance of young soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 29(5), 1317–1328 (2015).
Asmussen, E. & Bonde-Petersen, F. Storage of elastic energy in skeletal muscles in man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 91(3), 385–392 (1974).
Cavagna, G., Saibene, F. & Margaria, R. Effect of negative work on the amount of positive work performed by an isolated muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 20(1), 157–158 (1965).
Bosco, C. et al. Neuromuscular function and mechanical efficiency of human leg extensor muscles during jumping exercises. Acta Physiol. Scand. 114(4), 543–550 (1982).
Bosco, C. & Komi, P. V. Potentiation of the mechanical behavior of the human skeletal muscle through prestretching. Acta Physiol. Scand. 106(4), 467–72 (1979).
Bosco, C., Komi, P. V. & Ito, A. Prestretch potentiation of human skeletal muscle during ballistic movement. Acta Physiol. Scand. 111(2), 135–140 (1981).
Bosco, C., Viitasalo, J., Komi, P. & Luhtanen, P. Combined effect of elastic energy and myoelectrical potentiation during stretch-shortening cycle exercise. Acta Physiol. Scand. 114(4), 557–565 (1982).
Chmielewski, T. L., Myer, G. D., Kauffman, D. & Tillman, S. M. Plyometric exercise in the rehabilitation of athletes: Physiological responses and clinical application. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 36(5), 308–319 (2006).
Söhnlein, Q., Müller, E. & Stöggl, T. L. The effect of 16-week plyometric training on explosive actions in early to mid-puberty elite soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28(8), 2105–2114 (2014).
Ramirez-Campillo, R. et al. Optimal reactive strength index: Is it an accurate variable to optimize plyometric training effects on measures of physical fitness in young soccer players?. J. Strength Cond. Res. 32(4), 885–893 (2018).
Plummer, M. L., Baltag, V., Strong, K., Dick, B. & Al, F. Global Accelerated Action for the Health of Adolescents (AA-HA!): Guidance to Support Country Implementation (WHO, 2017).
Zheng, C., Poon, E.T.-C., Wan, K., Dai, Z. & Wong, S.H.-S. Effects of wearing a mask during exercise on physiological and psychological outcomes in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 53(1), 125–50 (2023).
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J. & Altman, D. G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 327(7414), 557–560 (2003).
Moran, J. J. et al. Age-related variation in male youth athletes’ countermovement jump after plyometric training: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. J. Strength Cond. Res. 31(2), 552–565 (2017).
Oxfeldt, M., Overgaard, K., Hvid, L. G. & Dalgas, U. Effects of plyometric training on jumping, sprint performance, and lower body muscle strength in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Scand. J. Med. Sci Sports 29(10), 1453–1465 (2019).
Stojanović, E., Ristić, V., McMaster, D. T. & Milanović, Z. Effect of plyometric training on vertical jump performance in female athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 47, 975–986 (2017).
Jeffreys, M. A., Croix, M. B. D. S., Lloyd, R. S., Oliver, J. L. & Hughes, J. D. The effect of varying plyometric volume on stretch-shortening cycle capability in collegiate male rugby players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 33(1), 139–145 (2019).
Taube, W. et al. Differential reflex adaptations following sensorimotor and strength training in young elite athletes. Int. J. Sports Med. 28(12), 999–1005 (2007).
Markovic, G. & Mikulic, P. Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training. Sports Med. 40, 859–895 (2010).
Ullrich, B., Pelzer, T. & Pfeiffer, M. Neuromuscular effects to 6 weeks of loaded countermovement jumping with traditional and daily undulating periodization. J. Strength Cond. Res. 32(3), 660–674 (2018).
Blazevich, A. J., Gill, N. D., Bronks, R. & Newton, R. U. Training-specific muscle architecture adaptation after 5-wk training in athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 35(12), 2013–2022 (2003).
Grosset, J.-F., Piscione, J., Lambertz, D. & Pérot, C. Paired changes in electromechanical delay and musculo-tendinous stiffness after endurance or plyometric training. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 105, 131–139 (2009).
Kubo, K. et al. Influences of tendon stiffness, joint stiffness, and electromyographic activity on jump performances using single joint. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 99, 235–243 (2007).
Cornu, C., Silveira, M.-I.A. & Goubel, F. Influence of plyometric training on the mechanical impedance of the human ankle joint. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 76, 282–8 (1997).
Fouré, A., Nordez, A., Guette, M. & Cornu, C. Effects of plyometric training on passive stiffness of gastrocnemii and the musculo-articular complex of the ankle joint. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 19(6), 811–8 (2009).
Váczi, M., Tollár, J., Meszler, B., Juhász, I. & Karsai, I. Short-term high intensity plyometric training program improves strength, power and agility in male soccer players. J. Hum. Kinet. 36, 17 (2013).
Komi, P. V. Stretch-shortening cycle: A powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. J. Biomech. 33(10), 1197–1206 (2000).
Latash, M. L. Neurophysiological Basis of Movement (Human Kinetics, 2008).
van Ingen Schenau, G. J., Bobbert, M. F. & de Haan, A. Mechanics and energetics of the stretch-shortening cycle: a stimulating discussion. J. Appl. Biomech. 13(4), 484–496 (1997).
Clemente, F. M. et al. Children’s exercise physiology. Front. Physiol. 11, 269 (2020).
Viru, A. et al. Critical periods in the development of performance capacity during childhood and adolescence. Eur. J. Phys. Educ. 4(1), 75–119 (1999).
Lloyd, R. S., Oliver, J. L., Hughes, M. G. & Williams, C. A. The effects of 4-weeks of plyometric training on reactive strength index and leg stiffness in male youths. J. Strength Cond. Res. 26(10), 2812–2819 (2012).
McGuigan, M. R. & Winchester, J. B. The relationship between isometric and dynamic strength in college football players. J. Sports Sci. Med. 7(1), 101 (2008).
Lloyd, R. S. et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: The 2014 International Consensus. Br. J. Sports Med. 48(7), 498–505 (2014).
Myer, G. D. et al. Sixty minutes of what? A developing brain perspective for activating children with an integrative exercise approach. Br. J. Sports Med. 49(23), 1510–1516 (2015).
Cairns, S. P. Lactic acid and exercise performance: Culprit or friend?. Sports Med. 36, 279–291 (2006).
Allen, D., Westerblad, H. & Lännergren, J. The role of intracellular acidosis in muscle fatigue. In Fatigue: Neural Muscular Mechanisms (ed. Pierce, P. A.) 57–68 (Springer, 1995).
Bigland-Ritchie, B. & Woods, J. Changes in muscle contractile properties and neural control during human muscular fatigue. Muscle Nerve Off. J. Am. Assoc. Electrodiagn. Med. 7(9), 691–699 (1984).
Enoka, R. M. & Duchateau, J. Translating fatigue to human performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 48(11), 2228–2238 (2016).
Gandevia, S. C. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1725 (2001).
Loturco, I. et al. Jump-squat and half-squat exercises: Selective influences on speed-power performance of elite rugby sevens players. PloS one 12(1), e0170627 (2017).
McCurdy, K. W., Langford, G. A., Doscher, M. W., Wiley, L. P. & Mallard, K. G. The effects of short-term unilateral and bilateral lower-body resistance training on measures of strength and power. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19(1), 9–15 (2005).
Spinks, C. D., Murphy, A. J., Spinks, W. L. & Lockie, R. G. The effects of resisted sprint training on acceleration performance and kinematics in soccer, rugby union, and Australian football players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 21(1), 77–85 (2007).
Gross, M. et al. Effects of eccentric cycle ergometry in alpine skiers. Int. J. Sports Med. 31, 572–6 (2010).
Huang, R. et al. Effects of lower-extremity explosive strength on youth judo athletes adopting different types of power-based resistance training. Front. Physiol. 14, 413 (2023).
Rüegg, J. C. Calcium in Muscle Contraction: Cellular and Molecular Physiology (Springer, 2012).
MacIntosh, B. R., Gardiner, P. F. & McComas, A. J. Skeletal Muscle: Form and Function (Human kinetics, 2006).
Stephenson, D., Lamb, G. & Stephenson, G. Events of the excitation–contraction–relaxation (E–C–R) cycle in fast-and slow-twitch mammalian muscle fibres relevant to muscle fatigue. Acta Physiol. Scand. 162(3), 229–245 (1998).
Sale, D. G. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 20(5 Suppl), S135–S145 (1988).
McArdle, W. D., Katch, F. I. & Katch, V. L. Exercise Physiology: Nutrition, Energy, and Human Performance (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010).
Hughes, B. W., Kusner, L. L. & Kaminski, H. Molecular architecture of the neuromuscular junction. Muscle Nerve Off. J. Am. Assoc. Electrodiagn. Med. 33(4), 445–461 (2006).
Ament, W. & Verkerke, G. J. Exercise and fatigue. Sports Med. 39, 389–422 (2009).
Folland, J. P. & Williams, A. G. J. S. M. Morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med. 37, 145–68 (2007).
Negra, Y. et al. Effectiveness and time-course adaptation of resistance training vs. plyometric training in prepubertal soccer players. J. Sport Health Sci. 9(6), 620–7 (2020).
Halson, S. L. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. 44(Suppl 2), 139–147 (2014).
Ford, P. et al. The long-term athlete development model: Physiological evidence and application. J. Sports Sci. 29(4), 389–402 (2011).
Slimani, M., Chamari, K., Miarka, B., Del Vecchio, F. B. & Chéour, F. Effects of plyometric training on physical fitness in team sport athletes: A systematic review. J. Hum. Kinet. 53, 231 (2016).
Faigenbaum, A. D. et al. Youth resistance training: Updated position statement paper from the national strength and conditioning association. J. Strength Cond. Res. 23, S60–S79 (2009).
Granacher, U. et al. Effects and mechanisms of strength training in children. Int. J. Sports Med. 32, 357–64 (2011).
Radnor, J. M. et al. The influence of growth and maturation on stretch-shortening cycle function in youth. Sports Med. 48, 57–71 (2018).
McKinlay, B. J. et al. Effects of plyometric and resistance training on muscle strength, explosiveness, and neuromuscular function in young adolescent soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 32(11), 3039–3050 (2018).
Lloyd, R. S. & Oliver, J. L. The youth physical development model: A new approach to long-term athletic development. Strength Cond. J. 34(3), 61–72 (2012).
Balyi, I. & Hamilton, A. Long-term athlete development: Trainability in childhood and adolescence. Olymp. Coach 16(1), 4–9 (2004).
Florini, J. R., Ewton, D. Z. & Coolican, S. A. Growth hormone and the insulin-like growth factor system in myogenesis. Endocr. Rev. 17(5), 481–517 (1996).
Jaffe, C. A., Turgeon, D. K., Lown, K., Demott-Friberg, R. & Watkins, P. B. Growth hormone secretion pattern is an independent regulator of growth hormone actions in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 283(5), E1008–E1015 (2002).
Faigenbaum, A. D. & Myer, G. D. Resistance training among young athletes: safety, efficacy and injury prevention effects. Br. J. Sports Med. 44(1), 56–63 (2010).
Behringer, M., Gruetzner, S., McCourt, M. & Mester, J. Effects of weight-bearing activities on bone mineral content and density in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29(2), 467–478 (2014).
Tenforde, A. S., Fredericson, M., Sayres, L. C., Cutti, P. & Sainani, K. L. Identifying sex-specific risk factors for low bone mineral density in adolescent runners. Am. J. Sports Med. 43(6), 1494–1504 (2015).
Asadi, A., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Arazi, H. & Sáez de, V. E. The effects of maturation on jumping ability and sprint adaptations to plyometric training in youth soccer players. J. Sports Sci. 36(21), 2405–11 (2018).
Attene, G. et al. Improving neuromuscular performance in young basketball players: Plyometric vs. technique training. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 55(1–2), 1–8 (2015).
Marta, C. et al. Suspension vs. plyometric training in children’s explosive strength. J. Strength Cond. Res. 36(2), 433–40 (2022).
Chelly, M. S., Hermassi, S., Aouadi, R. & Shephard, R. J. Effects of 8-week in-season plyometric training on upper and lower limb performance of elite adolescent handball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28(5), 1401–1410 (2014).
Chelly, M. S., Hermassi, S. & Shephard, R. J. Effects of in-season short-term plyometric training program on sprint and jump performance of young male track athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 29(8), 2128–2136 (2015).
De Villarreal, E. S., Molina, J. G., de Castro-Maqueda, G. & Gutiérrez-Manzanedo, J. V. Effects of plyometric, strength and change of direction training on high-school basketball player’s physical fitness. J. Hum. Kinet. 78(1), 175–186 (2021).
Drouzas, V., Katsikas, C., Zafeiridis, A., Jamurtas, A. Z. & Bogdanis, G. C. Unilateral plyometric training is superior to volume-matched bilateral training for improving strength, speed and power of lower limbs in preadolescent soccer athletes. J. Hum. Kinet. 74(1), 161–176 (2020).
Min, D. The Influence of Fast and Flexible Compound Training on Lower Limb Explosive Power and Athletic Performance in Adolescent Latin Dancers (Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 2020).
Fathi, A. et al. Effect of a 16-week combined strength and plyometric training program followed by a detraining period on athletic performance in pubertal volleyball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 33(8), 2117–2127 (2019).
Fischetti, F., Vilardi, A., Cataldi, S. & Greco, G. Effects of plyometric training program on speed and explosive strength of lower limbs in young athletes. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 18(4), 2476–2482 (2018).
Hall, E., Bishop, D. C. & Gee, T. I. Effect of plyometric training on handspring vault performance and functional power in youth female gymnasts. PloS one 11(2), e0148790 (2016).
Hammami, M., Gaamouri, N., Shephard, R. J. & Chelly, M. S. Effects of contrast strength vs. plyometric training on lower-limb explosive performance, ability to change direction and neuromuscular adaptation in soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 33(8), 2094–103 (2019).
Hernández, S. et al. Effects of plyometric training on neuromuscular performance in youth basketball players: A pilot study on the influence of drill randomization. J. Sports Sci. Med. 17(3), 372 (2018).
Idrizovic, K. et al. The effects of 3-month skill-based and plyometric conditioning on fitness parameters in junior female volleyball players. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 30(3), 353–363 (2018).
Palma-Muñoz, I. et al. Effects of progressed and nonprogressed volume-based overload plyometric training on components of physical fitness and body composition variables in youth male basketball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 35(6), 1642–1649 (2021).
Jlid, M. C. et al. Multidirectional plyometric training: very efficient way to improve vertical jump performance, change of direction performance and dynamic postural control in young soccer players. Front. Physiol. 10, 1462 (2019).
Kosova, S., Beyhan, R. & Kosova, M. K. The effect of 8-week plyometric training on jump height, agility, speed and asymmetry. Pedag. Phys. Cult. Sports. 26(1), 13–18 (2022).
Marzouki, H. et al. Effects of surface-type plyometric training on physical fitness in schoolchildren of both sexes: A randomized controlled intervention. Biology 11(7), 1035 (2022).
Meszler, B. & Váczi, M. Effects of short-term in-season plyometric training in adolescent female basketball players. Physiol. Int. 106(2), 168–179 (2019).
Michailidis, Y. et al. Plyometrics’ trainability in preadolescent soccer athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 27(1), 38–49 (2013).
Ozbar, N., Ates, S. & Agopyan, A. The effect of 8-week plyometric training on leg power, jump and sprint performance in female soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28(10), 2888–2894 (2014).
Padrón-Cabo, A., Lorenzo-Martínez, M., Pérez-Ferreirós, A., Costa, P. B. & Rey, E. Effects of plyometric training with agility ladder on physical fitness in youth soccer players. Int. J. Sports Med. 42(10), 896–904 (2021).
Potdevin, F. J., Alberty, M. E., Chevutschi, A., Pelayo, P. & Sidney, M. C. Effects of a 6-week plyometric training program on performances in pubescent swimmers. J. Strength Cond. Res. 25(1), 80–86 (2011).
Ramirez-Campillo, R. et al. Effects of plyometric training on physical performance of young male soccer players: Potential effects of different drop jump heights. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 31(3), 306–313 (2019).
Ramirez-Campillo, R. et al. Effects of combined surfaces vs. single-surface plyometric training on soccer players’ physical fitness. J. Strength Cond. Res. 34(9), 2644–53 (2020).
Ramirez-Campillo, R. et al. Sequencing effects of plyometric training applied before or after regular soccer training on measures of physical fitness in young players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 34(7), 1959–1966 (2020).
Romero, C. et al. Effects of maturation on physical fitness adaptations to plyometric jump training in youth females. J. Strength Cond. Res. 35(10), 2870–2877 (2021).
Sammoud, S. et al. The effects of plyometric jump training on jumping and swimming performances in prepubertal male swimmers. J. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 18(4), 805 (2019).
Sammoud, S. et al. The effects of plyometric jump training on jump and sport-specific performances in prepubertal female swimmers. J. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 19(1), 25–31 (2021).
Sedano, S., Matheu, A., Redondo, J. & Cuadrado, G. Effects of plyometric training on explosive strength, acceleration capacity and kicking speed in young elite soccer players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 51(1), 50 (2011).
Tottori, N. & Fujita, S. Effects of plyometric training on sprint running performance in boys aged 9–12 years. Sports 7(10), 219 (2019).
Uzelac-Sciran, T., Sarabon, N. & Mikulic, P. Effects of 8-week jump training program on sprint and jump performance and leg strength in pre-and post-peak height velocity aged boys. J. Sports Sci. Med. 19(3), 547 (2020).
Zribi, A. et al. Short-term lower-body plyometric training improves whole-body BMC, bone metabolic markers, and physical fitness in early pubertal male basketball players. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 26(1), 22–32 (2014).
Funding
Research Project Funded by the Guangdong Provincial Education Science Planning (2022GXJK242): Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Integration of Competitive Sports Education Model into Ideological and Political Education in Higher Education Physical Education Courses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.C. was responsible for selecting search terms, literature screening, evaluating article quality, and extracting literature features, and was a major contributor to manuscript writing; Z.H. was responsible for the final confirmation of data extraction for this part. L.X. was responsible for confirming the final search terms and data extraction; J.H. was responsible for proofreading the language; H.J. was responsible for proofreading the language; W.H. was responsible for data analysis, manuscript translation, and proofreading; D.L. was responsible for data analysis, manuscript translation, and proofreading; Y.Z. was responsible for manuscript writing, revision, and final version confirmation; J.S. was responsible for manuscript writing, revision, and final version confirmation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Huang, Z., Xie, L. et al. Maximizing plyometric training for adolescents: a meta-analysis of ground contact frequency and overall intervention time on jumping ability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 13, 21222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48274-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48274-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Effect of rest duration between sets on fatigue and recovery after short intense plyometric exercise
Scientific Reports (2024)