Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint protein that binds to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), which is expressed in activated T cells and other immune cells and has been employed in cancer therapy, including HCC. Recently, PD-L1 overexpression has been documented in treatment-resistant cancer cells. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor and the only FDA-approved treatment for advanced HCC. However, several patients exhibit resistance to sorafenib during treatment. This study aimed to assess the effect of glucose deprivation on PD-L1 expression in HCC cells. We used PD-L1-overexpressing HepG2 cells and IFN-γ-treated SK-Hep1 cells to explore the impact of glycolysis on PD-L1 expression. To validate the correlation between PD-L1 expression and glycolysis, we analyzed data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and used immunostaining for HCC tissue analysis. Furthermore, to modulate PD-L1 expression, we treated HepG2, SK-Hep1, and sorafenib-resistant SK-Hep1R cells with rapamycin. Here, we found that glucose deprivation reduced PD-L1 expression in HCC cells. Additionally, TCGA data and immunostaining analyses confirmed a positive correlation between the expression of hexokinase II (HK2), which plays a key role in glucose metabolism, and PD-L1. Notably, rapamycin treatment decreased the expression of PD-L1 and HK2 in both high PD-L1-expressing HCC cells and sorafenib-resistant cells. Our results suggest that the modulation of PD-L1 expression by glucose deprivation may represent a strategy to overcome PD-L1 upregulation in patients with sorafenib-resistant HCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and the most common cause of death in individuals with cirrhosis1. Due to the asymptomatic nature of early-stage HCC, it is often only detected at intermediate or advanced stages, which reduces the effectiveness of curative treatments such as surgical resection, ablation, or liver transplantation2. Sorafenib (Nexavar®), an orally-active multikinase inhibitor, is the first-line chemotherapy for advanced HCC. Clinical studies have shown that sorafenib can significantly extend the median survival time of patients with advanced HCC by approximately 3–5 months3. However, its anticancer efficacy is hindered by the development of drug resistance in the cells, resulting in a poor prognosis for patients4,5. Therefore, it is important to restore susceptibility to sorafenib in patients with drug-resistant HCC.
Studies of the mechanisms underlying cancer immune evasion have focused on the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway. PD-L1, a member of the B7 protein family, interacts with PD-1, which is expressed on various immune cells, such as antigen-presenting cells and endothelial cells6,7. Activation of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway leads to the suppression of immune cells and production of certain cytokines such as IFN-γ, resulting in the inhibition of the anti-tumor T cell response8,9. High expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 is associated with poor prognosis, increased HCC aggressiveness, and a higher risk of tumor relapse in patients who have undergone curative resection10,11,12,13. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab, two approved anti-PD-1 agents for HCC treatment, have exhibited durable responses in patients with advanced HCC who have received prior systemic therapy14,15. Pembrolizumab proved effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib15. Notably, dysregulation of PD-L1 expression has been documented in several carcinomas following treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, including cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel16,17. In the case of HCC, a significant upregulation of PD-L1 expression was observed in HCC cells after sorafenib therapy18,19. Currently, a treatment approach to decrease sorafenib resistance-induced elevated PD-L1 expression is yet to be fully developed.
Cancer cells require increased energy, and to meet this high biosynthetic demand, they modify their metabolic flux via various metabolic pathways. In the 1920s, Otto Warburg was the first to observe cancer cells convert glucose into lactate, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen. This phenomenon, known as aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg effect, is primarily characterized by increased glucose uptake, enhanced glycolysis, restricted mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, and an upregulation of the pentose phosphate pathway20. The resulting aberrant accumulation of metabolites, produced through alterations in the metabolic pathways of HCC and other kinds of cancerous cells, modulates the microenvironment and induces resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, including sorafenib21,22.
Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact of glucose deprivation on PD-L1 expression in HCC cells and the correlation between PD-L1 expression and glycolysis in tumors of patients with HCC. Strategies to modulate PD-L1 expression in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells have also been explored.
Results
Low glucose concentrations are associated with PD-L1 expression downregulation
The expression levels of PD-L1 were evaluated in four human HCC cell lines after treatment with IFN-γ. Following treatment, PD-L1 was markedly upregulated in the SK-Hep1 and Hep3B cell lines, but not in the Hep2 and Huh7 cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S1). To investigate the effects of glycolysis on PD-L1 expression, we used PD-L1 overexpressed HepG2 (low PD-L1 expression) and IFN-γ-treated-SK-Hep1 (high PD-L1 expression) cells. The expression levels of PD-L1 and HK2, hallmarks of glycolysis, were increased in PD-L1-overexpressed HepG2 cells (Fig. 1a,b) and IFN-γ-treated SK-Hep1 cells (Fig. 1c,d). Elevated PD-L1 and HK2 expression levels decreased after glucose deprivation both in PD-L1-overexpressed HepG2 cells (Fig. 1e,f) and IFN-γ-treated SK-Hep1 cells (Fig. 1g,h). These findings suggest a potential association between PD-L1 expression and glycolysis.
Correlation between PD-L1 expression and glycolysis in patients with HCC
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), using the OncoLnc TCGA data portal (www.oncolnc.org), and immunostaining assays on HCC tissues were used to establish a correlation between PD-L1 expression and glycolysis. TCGA analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between elevated HK2 expression and CD274 expression in patients with HCC (n = 360, Fig. 2a). Additionally, a similar association was observed with elevated SLC2A1 expression, which encodes glucose transporter protein type 1 (GLUT1; Fig. 2b). Further, the protein expression levels of PD-L1 and HK2 were verified using an HCC tissue microarray comprising 24 samples (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table S1). A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between the expression levels of PD-L1 and HK2 (R2 = 0.3878, p = 0.0080; Fig. 2d). However, the limited sample size precluded a statistically significant correlation from being established between PD-L1 and the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (TNM) stages. Overall, these findings confirm a positive correlation between PD-L1 expression and glycolysis in patients with HCC.
Upregulation of PD-L1 expression in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells
Sorafenib is a commonly used first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced HCC; however, patients often develop drug resistance within 6 months3. To comprehend the correlation between PD-L1 expression, glycolysis, and sorafenib resistance, we employed sorafenib-resistant SK-Hep1 cells, which are induced through exposure to increasing concentrations of sorafenib (1–10 μM) over 6 months. (IC50 of SK-Hep1 = 9.1 μM, IC50 of SK-Hep1R = 18.9 μM, Supplementary Fig. S2). Glucose uptake increased in SK-Hep1R cells following IFN-γ treatment compared to that in corresponding SK-Hep1 cells (Fig. 3a), as well as the upregulation of HK2 expression (Fig. 3b). The expression of CD274 was upregulated in SK-Hep1R cells compared with that in SK-Hep1 cells (Fig. 3c). Similar to the RNA expression levels, PD-L1 in SK-Hep1R cells exhibited much higher expression than the SK-Hep1 cells at the protein level, while HK2 showed a marginal increase in SK-Hep1R cells (Fig. 3d,e). Furthermore, glucose treatment resulted in a significant elevation of PD-L1 levels in SK-Hep1R cells compared to SK-Hep1 cells (Fig. 3f,g). These results suggest that glucose deprivation is a potential strategy for reducing elevated PD-L1 expression in highly glycolytic, sorafenib-resistant HCC cells.
Regulation of PD-L1 expression following rapamycin treatment
Autophagy induction has been observed following glucose deprivation in cells23. Therefore, to regulate PD-L1 expression, rapamycin, an autophagy inducer utilized in several clinical trials for treating advanced HCC, was employed. Rapamycin treatment induced a reduction in PD-L1 and HK2 expression levels in HepG2 cells overexpressing PD-L1, similar to the effects of glucose deprivation (Fig. 4a,b). Notably, combined treatment with rapamycin (0.1 µM and 1 µM) and sorafenib (10 µM) resulted in the lowest PD-L1 expression in HepG2 cells with PD-L1 overexpression, compared to single treatments (Fig. 4c,d). The expression of HK2 after combination treatment showed levels lower than those observed with single sorafenib treatment, but not lower than rapamycin treatment. SK-Hep1R cells, treated with IFN-γ, also exhibited reduced PD-L1 and HK2 expression after rapamycin treatment. SK-Hep1R cells demonstrated a more pronounced reduction in PD-L1 and HK2 compared to SK-Hep1 cells (Fig. 4e,f). Thus, rapamycin treatment might regulate PD-L1, which is amplified in sorafenib-resistant cells.
Enhanced anticancer activity following rapamycin treatment
To evaluate the PD-L1 and PD-1 binding affinity following rapamycin treatment, co-culture experiments were performed using Jurkat-Lucia™ TCR-hPD-1 and Raji-APC-hPD-L1 cells. Jurkat-Lucia™ TCR-hPD-1 cells were genetically engineered to produce a bioluminescent signal when the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 is inhibited. Relative light units (RLUs) increased after rapamycin treatment, indicating that rapamycin decreased the binding affinity between PD-L1 and PD-1 in the co-culture system (Fig. 5a). Since rapamycin reduced the binding of PD-1 and PD-L1, the cytolytic activity of Jurkat-Lucia™ TCR-hPD-1 cells was measured in co-culture with SK-Hep1R cells to examine the potential anticancer effect. Rapamycin enhanced the cytolytic activity of Jurkat-Lucia™ TCR-hPD-1 cells in these co-cultures (Fig. 5b,c). Compared with the control, the mRNA expression levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2 were significantly increased in Jurkat-Lucia™ TCR-hPD-1 cells after co-culture with SK-Hep1R cells treated with rapamycin (Fig. 5d–f). In conclusion, rapamycin caused a reduction in PD-L1 levels and significant induction of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity against SK-Hep1R cells (Fig. 5g).
Discussion
Increased glycolysis has been linked to chemotherapy resistance and poor clinical outcomes in patients with HCC24,25. Recent studies have supported the notion that elevated PD-L1 expression is associated with increased glycolysis in tumors, leading to the immune escape of tumor cells26. In the present study, we confirmed the positive correlation between PD-L1 expression and glycolysis in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells. We also established that rapamycin treatment enhances the cytolytic activity of immune cells by decreasing PD-L1 expression in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells.
Sorafenib has been shown to improve survival outcomes in patients with HCC; however, its long-term efficacy is impaired by the emergence of resistance through various mechanisms. A recent study by Lu et al. identified elevated PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells of patients with HCC following sorafenib treatment18. Our study further revealed the upregulation of CD274/PD-L1 in HCC cells upon acquisition of sorafenib resistance. The upregulation of PD-L1 aggravates sorafenib-resistant HCC cells by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the PI3K/Akt pathway27. Liu et al. also demonstrated that the PD-L1/DNMT1 axis plays a role in sorafenib resistance in HCC, and inhibiting both PD-L1 and DNMT1 expression could restore the sensitivity of cells to sorafenib28. These previous studies lacked a clear understanding of why PD-L1 expression is increased in sorafenib-resistant cells. Our study revealed that sorafenib-resistant cells exhibit high glucose uptake and that this increase in glycolysis leads to elevated PD-L1 levels. Hypoxia, a major mechanism underlying glycolysis and cancer therapy resistance, induces PD-L1 upregulation in various tumor cells29,30. Therefore, hypoxia-induced glycolysis may contribute to the upregulation of PD-L1 and HK2 in patients with HCC. Hypoxia has been reported to be a major driver of resistance to cancer therapeutics31.
The FDA has approved the use of rapamycin for renal and liver transplantation. Patients with recurrent HCC display high levels of PD-L1 expression and reduced relapse-free survival compared with those with lower PD-L1 expression19. Recent studies have demonstrated a reduction in PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer lines following exposure to rapamycin, an autophagy inducer32. Our study shows that rapamycin treatment reduces PD-L1 expression, making it more effective against sorafenib-resistant cells. The interplay between autophagy and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has been studied in various cancers. Wang et al. discovered that autophagy regulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer via the p62/SQSTM1-NF-κB pathway33. Further, in bladder cancer, PD-L1 mRNA stability, and expression are regulated by the ATG7/autophagy/FOXO3A/miR-145 axis34. Recent studies have reported the synergistic anticancer effects of a combination of sorafenib and rapamycin treatment on HCC cells. Gulhati et al. demonstrated that the addition of sorafenib to rapamycin treatment resulted in the abrogation of rapamycin-induced activation of the PI3K/Akt and Ras-MAPK signaling pathways, leading to enhanced antitumor effects5. Combination therapy significantly reduced tumor cell proliferation and increased the suppression of tumor cell angiogenesis compared to a single treatment in an in vivo animal model35. Additionally, our study highlights the potential anticancer effects of combining rapamycin therapy with sorafenib in HCC, with specific emphasis on the treatment of sorafenib-resistant HCC. Long-term treatment with other anticancer drugs has been shown to alter PD-L1 expression. High levels of PD-L1 have been observed in cisplatin-resistant small-cell lung carcinoma cells and enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells36, suggesting the need for further investigation into the effects of rapamycin and other anticancer drugs on resistant cancer cells.
The overexpression of PD-L1 in various tumors is associated with patient survival and tumor recurrence. PD-L1 expression is a significant prognostic indicator of overall survival in HCC37. Additionally, PD-L1 regulates stem-like properties and contributes to tumor invasion. Thus, reducing PD-L1 expression, which is associated with tumorigenesis, is crucial for effective tumor treatment.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that sorafenib resistance leads to increased PD-L1 expression through elevated glucose metabolism, resulting in decreased sensitivity to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. Collectively, the combination of rapamycin and sorafenib presents a new therapeutic option for counteracting the upregulation of PD-L1 expression in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells, leading to a reduction in tumor aggressiveness.
Methods
Chemicals
Sorafenib (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), rapamycin (Selleckchem, Bristol, UK and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), IFN-γ (Gibco, Grand Island, New York) and D-(+)-glucose (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used in this study. Sorafenib and rapamycin were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma Aldrich) and stored at − 80 °C. IFN-γ was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 10 mM and stored at − 80 °C. D-( +)-glucose was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 1 M and stored at 4 °C.
Cell culture and generation of SK-Hep1R cells
Human HCC cell lines—HepG2, Hep3B, SK-Hep1, and Huh7 were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea); Jurkat-LuciaTM TCR-hPD-1 and Raji-APC-hPD-L1 cells were purchased from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA, USA). HepG2 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), whereas Hep3B, SK-Hep1, and Huh7 were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Jurkat-Lucia™ TCR-hPD-1 and Raji-APC-hPD-L1 cells were cultured in modified Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM; Thermo Fisher Scientific) with selective antibiotics and handled following the manufacturer's recommendations. All media were supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. Cells were maintained in a humidified incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. SK-Hep1 cells were first continuously exposed to increasing concentrations of sorafenib (1–10 μM) over 6 months. Sorafenib resistance was examined by cell viability assay. Sorafenib-resistant SK-Hep1 (SK-Hep1R) cells exhibited a diminished reduction in cell proliferation after sorafenib treatment as compared to that with SK-Hep1 cells. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated by performing a nonlinear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism (Supplementary Figure S2, IC50 of SK-Hep1 = 9.1 μM, IC50 of SK-Hep1R = 18.9 μM).
Cell viability and glucose uptake assays
A Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, DOJINDO Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. To measure the binding affinity of PD-L1 for PD-1, Raji-APC-hPD-L1 cells (approximately 5 × 104 cells/mL) were pre-incubated with rapamycin for 6 h and co-cultured with Jurkat-Lucia™ TCR-hPD-1 cells (approximately 1 × 105 cells/mL) in a 96-well plate. After an additional 24 h of incubation, 50 µL of QUANTI‑Luc™ 4 reagent (InvivoGen) was added to each well, and luminescence was immediately measured using a luminescence microplate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). To measure cytolytic activity, SK-Hep1R cells were maintained for 48 h at 37 °C in 12-well plates at an effector cell: target cell (E:T) ratio of 10:1. The cytolytic activity was assessed using crystal violet staining (0.25% v/v in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)) after fixation with methanol. Positive tumor regions were quantified using cellSens Imaging software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), with images acquired using a BX53 light microscope (Olympus). Glucose uptake was determined using a Glucose Assay kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Absorbance was measured at 440 and 640 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).
Real-time (RT) PCR and TCGA data
Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a C1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) with SYBR Green RT PCR Master Mix (Toyobo). Gene expression levels were normalized to those of GAPDH mRNA in the corresponding cDNA samples. The following primers were used for this assay: CD274 (forward, 5′-AAGAAAAGGGAGCACACAGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCCCAAGATGACAGACGATG-3′), HK2 (forward 5′-AAGGTAGAAATGGAGCGAGGT-3′, reverse 5′-CCCGGAAATTTGTTCCTCCAA-3′), hTNF-α (forward 5′-TTCTCCTTCCTGATCGTGGCA-3′, reverse 5′-TAGAGAGAGGTCCCTGGGGAA-3′), hIFN-γ (forward 5′-TCGGTAACTGACTTGAATGTCCA-3′, reverse 5′-TCGCTTCCCTGTTTTAGCTGC-3′), hIL-2 (forward 5′-AAGAATCCCAAACTCACCAG-3′, reverse 5′-CGTTGATATTGCTGATTAAGTCC-3′), and hGAPDH (forward, 5′-ACAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCTT-3′ and reverse 5′-TTGATTTTGGAGGGATCTCG-3′). For TCGA analysis, a set of 360 HCC samples, including high- and low-gene expression groups (50–75 percentile), was obtained from the OncoLnc TCGA data portal (www.oncolnc.org).
Western blotting
Western blotting (WB) was performed as described previously38. HepG2 cells were transfected with pCMV-PD-L1 (Sinobio, Wayne, PA, USA), and SK-Hep1/SK-Hep1R cells were treated with IFN-γ. After incubation for 48 h, proteins were extracted using lysis buffer. Protein concentrations were measured and validated using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (DeNovix Inc, Wilmington, USA), and 20 µg of protein was used for WB. Primary antibodies used in the present study were anti-PD-L1 (catalog no. 29122, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA 1:500), anti-HKII (catalog no. ab209847; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; 1:500), and anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalog no. sc-47778; 1:5000). WB using biological replicates showed similar expression data, indicating the reproducibility of the results. For band quantification, images were analyzed using ImageJ software39.
Immunostaining
The tissue microarray, which contained samples from 24 cases of HCC, was purchased from TissueArray.Com LLC (catalog no. LV246, Derwood, MD, USA). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using an ImmPRESS Duet Double Staining Polymer Kit (HRP Anti-Mouse IgG-brown, AP Anti-Rabbit IgG-magenta; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Following antigen retrieval, immunostaining was performed with various antibodies. The primary antibodies used were anti-PD-L1 XP (Cell Signaling Technology; catalog no. 13684; 1:150) and anti-HKII (Abcam; catalog no. ab104826; 1:300). Images were recorded using an Olympus BX53 microscope and analyzed using Olympus CellSens software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's multiple comparison tests was performed to detect differences between three or more groups. A paired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to detect significant differences between the two sets of data, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J. & Pisani, P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int. J. Cancer 94, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.1440 (2001).
Forner, A., Reig, M. & Bruix, J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 391, 1301–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2 (2018).
Llovet, J. M. et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0708857 (2008).
Villanueva, A. & Llovet, J. M. Second-line therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: emergence of resistance to sorafenib. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 1824–1826. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0151 (2012).
Gulhati, P. et al. Sorafenib enhances the therapeutic efficacy of rapamycin in colorectal cancers harboring oncogenic KRAS and PIK3CA. Carcinogenesis 33, 1782–1790. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgs203 (2012).
Freeman, G. J. et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J. Exp. Med. 192, 1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.192.7.1027 (2000).
Chen, L. Co-inhibitory molecules of the B7-CD28 family in the control of T-cell immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1349 (2004).
Mimura, K. et al. PD-L1 expression is mainly regulated by interferon gamma associated with JAK-STAT pathway in gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 109, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13424 (2018).
Taube, J. M. et al. Colocalization of inflammatory response with B7–h1 expression in human melanocytic lesions supports an adaptive resistance mechanism of immune escape. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003689 (2012).
Gao, Q. et al. Overexpression of PD-L1 significantly associates with tumor aggressiveness and postoperative recurrence in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 971–979. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1608 (2009).
Shi, F. et al. PD-1 and PD-L1 upregulation promotes CD8(+) T-cell apoptosis and postoperative recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Int. J. Cancer 128, 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25397 (2011).
Calderaro, J. et al. Programmed death ligand 1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: Relationship With clinical and pathological features. Hepatology 64, 2038–2046. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28710 (2016).
Mocan, T., Sparchez, Z., Craciun, R., Bora, C. N. & Leucuta, D. C. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis in hepatocellular carcinoma: Prognostic and therapeutic perspectives. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 21, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1975-4 (2019).
El-Khoueiry, A. B. et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): An open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet 389, 2492–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31046-2 (2017).
Zhu, A. X. et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): A non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 19, 940–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30351-6 (2018).
Gong, W. et al. Paclitaxel induced B7–H1 expression in cancer cells via the MAPK pathway. J. Chemother. 23, 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2011.23.5.295 (2011).
McDaniel, A. S. et al. Expression of PDL1 (B7–H1) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma. Eur. Urol. Focus 1, 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2015.03.004 (2016).
Lu, L. C. et al. Increased expression of programmed death-ligand 1 in infiltrating immune cells in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues after sorafenib treatment. Liver Cancer 8, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489021 (2019).
Tan, Y. et al. Overexpression of PD-L1 is an Independent predictor for recurrence in HCC patients who receive sorafenib treatment after surgical resection. Front. Oncol. 11, 783335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.783335 (2021).
Koppenol, W. H., Bounds, P. L. & Dang, C. V. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3038 (2011).
Xia, S., Pan, Y., Liang, Y., Xu, J. & Cai, X. The microenvironmental and metabolic aspects of sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. EBioMedicine 51, 102610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.102610 (2020).
Vaupel, P., Schmidberger, H. & Mayer, A. The Warburg effect: Essential part of metabolic reprogramming and central contributor to cancer progression. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 95, 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2019.1589653 (2019).
Matter, M. S., Decaens, T., Andersen, J. B. & Thorgeirsson, S. S. Targeting the mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma: Current state and future trends. J. Hepatol. 60, 855–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.031 (2014).
Feng, J. et al. Emerging roles and the regulation of aerobic glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 39, 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-020-01629-4 (2020).
Ashton, T. M., McKenna, W. G., Kunz-Schughart, L. A. & Higgins, G. S. Oxidative phosphorylation as an emerging target in cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 2482–2490. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3070 (2018).
Yu, Y. et al. Glucose metabolism involved in PD-L1-mediated immune escape in the malignant kidney tumour microenvironment. Cell Death Discov. 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00401-7 (2021).
Xu, G. L. et al. Upregulation of PD-L1 expression promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Gastroenterol. Rep. (Oxf.) 8, 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaa049 (2020).
Liu, J., Liu, Y., Meng, L., Liu, K. & Ji, B. Targeting the PD-L1/DNMT1 axis in acquired resistance to sorafenib in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 38, 899–907. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5722 (2017).
Ding, X. C. et al. The relationship between expression of PD-L1 and HIF-1alpha in glioma cells under hypoxia. J. Hematol. Oncol. 14, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01102-5 (2021).
Noman, M. Z. et al. PD-L1 is a novel direct target of HIF-1alpha, and its blockade under hypoxia enhanced MDSC-mediated T cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 211, 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20131916 (2014).
Muz, B., de la Puente, P., Azab, F. & Azab, A. K. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia (Auckl.) 3, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.2147/HP.S93413 (2015).
Cao, X. et al. TUSC2 downregulates PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oncotarget 8, 107621–107629. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22581 (2017).
Wang, X. et al. Autophagy inhibition enhances PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 38, 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1148-5 (2019).
Zhu, J. et al. A feedback loop formed by ATG7/autophagy, FOXO3a/miR-145 and PD-L1 regulates stem-like properties and invasion in human bladder cancer. Cancers (Basel) 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11030349 (2019).
Wang, Z. et al. Effect of rapamycin alone and in combination with sorafenib in an orthotopic model of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 5124–5130. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4774 (2008).
Yan, F. et al. Elevated cellular PD1/PD-L1 expression confers acquired resistance to cisplatin in small cell lung cancer cells. PLoS ONE 11, e0162925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162925 (2016).
Jung, H. I. et al. Overexpression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 49, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.066 (2017).
Lee, M., Jeon, J. Y., Neugent, M. L., Kim, J. W. & Yun, M. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 34, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-017-9847-9 (2017).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).
Funding
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Seoul, Korea; Grant numbers NRF-2022R1A2C1007956) and an Incheon National University Research Assistance Program (2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.L. and J.C.P. conceived and designed all the experiments. S.C., W.K., D.Y., Y.H., Y.P., and H.H. performed the experiments, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. S.K., J.K., S.P., and H.J. performed the data analysis and interpreted the results. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, S., Kim, W., Yoo, D. et al. Impact of glucose metabolism on PD-L1 expression in sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Sci Rep 14, 1751 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52160-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52160-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) Writer WTAP Potentiates Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immune Evasion and Aerobic Glycolysis
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (2024)