Abstract
Smoking has multiple negative effects on health; therefore, the Taiwanese government provides smoking cessation clinics to smokers. This study aimed to explore the trajectory of smoking cessation after smokers received treatment and the variables related to different trajectories. A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted, in which 735 adult smokers who received smoking cessation medications were recruited. The participants’ demographic characteristics, chronic diseases, smoking characteristics, and cigarette dependence were collected from chart review. The amount of smoking was collected at baseline, and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. The Proc Traj procedure for group-based modeling and multinomial logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Three trajectories were identified: early quitters (28.03%), late quitters (11.43%) and reducers (60.54%). Compared with early quitters, reducers were younger and had a higher probability of severe cigarette dependence. Compared with early quitters, late quitters had a higher number of taking smoking cessation medications. The findings revealed that approximately 60% of participants who received smoking cessation treatment could not completely quit smoking, and that age, number of medications taken, and cigarette dependence were significant predictors of different trajectories.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Smoking has multiple negative effects on health, including shortening life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy, increasing the number of years lived with a disability, and decreasing health-related quality of life1,2. In 2020, the smoking rate in Taiwan was 13.1% (men: 23.1%, women: 2.9%), with the highest smoking rate in men among those 46–50 years old (39.7%) and women aged among those 21–25 years old (7.5%)3. To mitigate the impact of smoking, the Taiwanese government has deployed multiple strategies, not only policy-based but also personal approaches, one of which is the establishment of smoking cessation clinics4.
Smoking is an easy relapse behavior, with studies showing smoking relapse in 37.1% of British5 and 69.5% of Taiwanese6 respondents after the initial 1 year of smoking abstinence. Previous studies have focused on the developmental trajectories of smoking in adolescents7, young adults8, and adults throughout their lifespan9,10, showing changes in smoking status. A study with a 1-year follow-up found that 72% of smokers without quit motivation had a stable trajectory in smoking11. Except for stable nonsmokers or smokers, certain groups of people increased, decreased, or quit smoking.
Some studies have explored smoking trajectories following smoking cessation medication intervention. In a survey of 300 female smokers, after using a nicotine patch for 1 month, the participants were divided into three groups: abstainers who did not smoke in the first week and first month (132, 44.0%), early lapsers who smoked in the first week (75, 25.0%), and late lapsers (93, 31.0%)12. In another study of 265 adolescents, after six months of nicotine replacement treatment, the participants showed three trajectories: persistent smokers (34.6%), moderate decreasers (16.0%), and stronger decreasers (49.6%)13. A proportion of smokers who received smoking cessation medication would still smoke or relapse.
Free smoking cessation medication combining sustained telephone counseling could improve the smoking quit rate14. The Taiwan government has implemented a smoking cessation policy, providing individuals over aged 18 and above who smoke with access to free medications at smoking cessation clinics. Smoking cessation case managers follow up smoking status by telephone to improve the outcome of smoking cessation.
Regarding variables related to different trajectories, men10,15, younger age15,16, low educational level17, lower socioeconomic status, unemployment10, low-skill work9, and blue-collar workers18 tended to have worse trajectories, including relapse, increased smoking, or persistent smoking. Smokers with chronic diseases had more smoking cessation attempts and were more likely to quit smoking than those without19,20. In addition, previous smoking volume12,17,21,22,23, years of smoking16, previous attempts to quit11, intention to quit11,13,15,16,17, and cigarette dependence15,21,23,24,25 were significantly associated with smoking trajectories.
Smokers may not quit smoking in the early stage of taking medication, and they may relapse after a period of time. Identifying the trajectories of smoking cessation and related variables are useful for clinical care for essential interventions. This study aimed to explore the trajectories of smoking cessation among patients in a smoking cessation clinic and variables related to different trajectories.
Methods
Study design
This was a retrospective longitudinal study. Smoking cessation case managers approached potential patients who smoked. When the patients were willing to join the smoking cessation program, they were referred to the smoking cessation clinics. They could obtain smoking cessation mediations from the pharmacy department of the hospital. Typically, they would get 1 weeks’ supply each time and could return to the clinics if needed. The medications were provided free of charge. Care managers conducted follow-ups at four timepoints: at the beginning of treatment (T1), after 1 week (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4). The care managers collected T1 data face-to-face and T2 to T4 data via telephone. The data were recorded in the charts.
The research team obtained ethical approval from the institutional review board of the Ditmanson Medical Foundation of, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital (IRB number: IRB2021067) and then collected data from the charts. The data period spanned from January 2019 to December 2019. All participants recruited for the face-to-face survey signed informed consent forms. All procedures were performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki’s statement.
Participants
The participants included: (1) smokers aged over 18 years old, (2) those willing to attend the smoking cessation clinics to quit smoking, and (3) those receiving smoking cessation medication at a smoking cessation clinic located in a district teaching hospital in Southern Taiwan.
Measurements
The demographic characteristics included age, sex, educational level, and work status. Work included none, blue-collar workers (construction, manufacturing, transportation, agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and animal husbandry), and white-collar workers (government employees, financial, service, medical, and commercial).
Chronic diseases included whether the participants had cancer, lung disease, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, liver disease, kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, and others (yes or no). The total number of chronic diseases was calculated.
Smoking characteristics included years of smoking, number of cigarettes smoked a day before treatment, and cigarette addiction, which were assessed using the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ)26,27. The FTQ includes six items, ranging from 0 to 10: 0 to 5 being mild dependence, 6 to 7 moderate dependence, and 8 to 10 severe dependence. The translated Taiwanese version of the FTQ has shown good reliability and validity28. The number of individuals taking smoking cessation medication was also collected.
A three-point Likert scale was used to evaluate the amount of smoking: “Compared with the amount of smoking before treatment, how many cigarettes do you smoke in seven days?” (3 = none; 2 = less than before; 1 = the same).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analysis was used to present demographic, chronic disease, and smoking characteristics and group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify the trajectory patterns of smoking cessation29. Univariate analysis was used to test the differences in the predictors between the different types of trajectories, and multinomial logistic regression was used to identify the variables related to the different trajectories. The dependent variables were the different trajectory types, and significant variables in the univariate analysis were entered as predictors. The Bonferroni correction was used to reduce the inflated type I error rate30. As there were five predictors (age, number taking smoking cessation medication, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and moderate and severe cigarette dependence), a significant level of p less than 0.01 (0.05/5) was utilized.
Regarding the estimation of sample size, at least 500 participants were required for group-based trajectory modeling31, with each group necessitating at least 5% of the total participants32. The study’s sample size met group-based trajectory modeling and multinomial logistic regression. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.0. This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines33.
Results
In total, 735 participants enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 52.82 years old (SD = 13.23); 89.25% were men, 40.14% completed senior high school education, and 40.27% were blue-collar workers. Regarding chronic diseases, 59.46% of participants reported having chronic conditions, with hypertension (31.97%) being the most prevalent. The average duration of smoking was 30.14 years (SD = 12.61), and participants smoked an average of 25.37 cigarettes per day (SD = 14.30). Mild, moderate, and severe cigarette dependence were reported by 19.86%, 34.29%, and 45.85% of participants, respectively (see Table 1). All participants received smoking cessation treatment, with 725 (98.64%) prescribed Champix and 10 (1.36%) receiving Nicotinell TTS.
Three smoking cessation trajectories were identified (refer to Fig. 1). Trajectory 1 comprised “reducers” (n = 445, 60.54%), representing participants who smoked less than before the treatment across all periods. Trajectory 2 were “late quitters” (n = 84, 11.43%), reflecting participants who smoked less than before at T2 and abstained from smoking at T3 and T4. Trajectory 3 were “early quitters” (n = 206, 28.03%), comprising participants who refrained from smoking at T2, T3, and T4.
The univariate analysis revealed differences among the three groups in age (F = 3.54, p = 0.029), number of smoking cessation medications taken (F = 6.60, p = 0.001), number of cigarettes smoked per day (F = 8.52, p < 0.001), and cigarette dependence (χ2 = 36.78, p < 0.001). Reducers were younger than early quitters, smoked more cigarettes per day than early and late quitters, and had more severe cigarette dependence. Late quitters had a higher number of smoking cessation medications taken than early quitters (see Table 1). Furthermore, compared with early quitters, reducers were younger (B = − 0.02, p = 0.007) and had a higher probability of severe cigarette dependence (B = 1.26, p < 0.001). Late quitters had a higher number of smoking cessation medications taken than early quitters (B = 0.73, p < 0.001) (see Table 2).
Discussion
This study used longitudinal data to explore the smoking trajectories among participants who received smoking cessation medications. Three trajectories were identified: early quitters, late quitters, and reducers. The significantly related variables included age, number of taking smoking cessation medications, and cigarette dependence.
Early quitters stopped smoking at the start of the intervention and maintained until 6 months later. Late quitters decreased their smoking from the beginning to 3 months and then stopped smoking until 6 months. Meanwhile, reducers continued smoking throughout the entire period but smoked less than before. Previous studies have demonstrated success rates of quitting ranged from 1617 to 26.913 to 44%12. Previous studies showed one of trajectories that more than 30% of the participants were persistent smokers13, and there were early and late relapse trajectories12. The success rate in this study, including early and late quitters, was 39.46%. Notably, smoking cessation medications were used in this study, whereas Cofta-Woerpel et al.12 used nicotine replacement therapy. Medication success rates may be higher than psychosocial interventions16,17.
Like previous studies15,16, the older participants in this study tended to quit smoking. On the other hand, a four-country survey showed younger smokers had higher attempts to quit and were more likely to quit than older smokers. However, after adjustment for nicotine dependence, the relationship between age and smoking abstinence was insignificant. Heaviness of smoking may play a more important role in smoking cessation34. A 4-year longitudinal study focusing on middle-aged and older adults showed smoking cessation related to older adults and poor self-rated health and smoking relapse related to younger age and good self-rated health35. Age may interrelate with smoking years, health, and nicotine dependence34. Most participants in this study were middle-aged adults, and older people may be more concerned about their health and attempt to quit smoking.
The results support cigarette dependence as a predictor of smoking cessation, which is consistent with previous studies15,21,23,24,25; however, differences in cigarette dependence only occurred between early quitters and reducers. Nicotine dependence has not only a biological mechanism but also a psychological mechanism on perceived behavioral control related smoking cessation36. Smokers with higher nicotine dependence had more difficulty in smoking cessation.
Adherence to smoking cessation medications was significantly related to successful smoking cessation37,38. Early quitters and late quitters had a similar process from 3 to 6 months, and late quitters took more cessation medication than early quitters. The potential reason was that late quitters had higher needs for medications, which were helpful for the reduction of smoking from 3 to 6 months.
Regarding clinical implications, healthcare professionals could focus their attention on monitoring the amount of smoking 1 month after treatment to determine the likelihood of participants achieving smoking cessation. Notably, approximately 60% of the participants continued smoking. Thus, medication alone is not sufficient for smoking cessation, and other psychosocial interventions may be needed39.
The strength of this study is its utilization of longitudinal data from a large sample size. However, there were some limitations. First, smoking status relied on self-reports rather than objective physical measurements such as carbon monoxide levels. Additionally, using a three-point Likert scale may not capture nuances compared with detailed levels of smoking assessment. Second, participants were recruited from outpatient clinics of a single hospital, comprising individuals willing to quit smoking and open to smoking cessation medications, with no collection of data on medication adherence. The results may not be generalized to other populations. Future studies should collect physical measurements over longer follow-up periods.
In conclusion, this study identified three trajectories following the administration of smoking cessation medication: early quitters, late quitters, and reducers. It was observed that participants who were older, adhered to smoking cessation medications, and exhibited lower levels of cigarette dependence tended to be early quitters.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.
References
Van Oyen, H. et al. The effect of smoking on the duration of life with and without disability, Belgium 1997–2011. BMC Public Health 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-723 (2014).
Strandberg, A. Y. et al. The effect of smoking in midlife on health-related quality of life in old age: A 26-year prospective study. Arch. Intern. Med. 168(18), 1968–1974. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.18.1968 (2008).
Health Promotion Administration. Results of Taiwan Adults Smoking Behavior Survey. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1718&pid=9913 (2021).
Chen, P. C., Lee, Y. C., Tsai, S. T. & Lai, C. K. A cost–benefit analysis of the outpatient smoking cessation services in Taiwan from a societal viewpoint. Nicotine Tob. Res. 14(5), 522–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr241 (2012).
Hawkins, J., Hollingworth, W. & Campbell, R. Long-term smoking relapse. A study using the British household panel survey. Nicotine Tob. Res. 12(12), 1228–1235. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq175 (2010).
Hsueh, K. C., Chen, C. Y., Yang, Y. H. & Huang, C. L. Smoking cessation program in outpatient clinics of family medicine department in Taiwan: A longitudinal evaluation. Eval. Health Prof. 33(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278709356185 (2010).
Bernat, D. H., Erickson, D. J., Widome, R., Perry, C. L. & Forster, J. L. Adolescent smoking trajectories: Results from a population-based cohort study. J. Adolesc. Health 43(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.02.014 (2008).
Caldeira, K. M. et al. Cigarette smoking among college students: Longitudinal trajectories and health outcomes. Nicotine Tob. Res. 14(7), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts131 (2012).
Dobson, K. G., Gilbert-Ouimet, M., Mustard, C. A. & Smith, P. M. Association between dimensions of the psychosocial and physical work environment and latent smoking trajectories: A 16-year cohort study of the Canadian workforce. Occup. Environ. Med. 75(11), 814–821. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105138 (2018).
Oura, P., Rissanen, I., Junno, J.-A., Harju, T. & Paananen, M. Lifelong smoking trajectories of Northern Finns are characterized by sociodemographic and lifestyle differences in a 46-year follow-up. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 16365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73334-3 (2020).
Mathew, A. R., Garrett-Mayer, E., Heckman, B. W., Wahlquist, A. E. & Carpenter, M. J. One-year smoking trajectories among established adult smokers with low baseline motivation to quit. Nicotine Tob. Res. 20(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw264 (2017).
Cofta-Woerpel, L. et al. Early cessation success or failure among women attempting to quit smoking: Trajectories and volatility of urge and negative mood during the first postcessation week. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 120(3), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023755 (2011).
Scherphof, C. S., van den Eijnden, R. J., Lugtig, P., Engels, R. C. & Vollebergh, W. A. Adolescents’ use of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: Predictors of compliance trajectories. Psychopharmacology 231(8), 1743–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3511-8 (2014).
Park, E. R. et al. Effect of sustained smoking cessation counseling and provision of medication vs shorter-term counseling and medication advice on smoking abstinence in patients recently diagnosed with cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 324(14), 1406–1418. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.14581 (2020).
Hsu, C. L. et al. Long-term smoking cessation rates in elderly versus other adult smokers: A 3-year follow-up study in Taiwan. Addict. Behav. Rep. 8, 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2018.07.001 (2018).
Conklin, C. A. et al. The return to smoking: 1-year relapse trajectories among female smokers. Nicotine Tob. Res. 7(4), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200500185371 (2005).
Wong, D. C. et al. Quitting trajectories of Chinese youth smokers following telephone smoking cessation counseling: A longitudinal study. Nicotine Tob. Res. 13(9), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr086 (2011).
Huang, Y. T. et al. Determining high prevalence of betel-quid chewing and cigarette smoking by occupation using the Taiwan National Health Interview Survey. Subst. Use Misuse 55(9), 1472–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2020.1732421 (2020).
Lee, J. E., Park, E. C., Chun, S. Y., Park, H. K. & Kim, T. H. Socio-demographic and clinical factors contributing to smoking cessation among men: A four-year follow up study of the Korean Health Panel Survey. BMC Public Health 16, 908. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3583-y (2016).
Wang, R. et al. Prevalence of tobacco related chronic diseases and its role in smoking cessation among smokers in a rural area of Shanghai, China: A cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 19, 753. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7110-9 (2019).
Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N. et al. Adolescent smoking trajectories and nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob. Res. 10(2), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200701838257 (2008).
Guttentag, A., Tseng, T.-Y., Shelley, D. & Kirchner, T. Analyzing trajectories of acute cigarette reduction post-introduction of an e-cigarette using ecological momentary assessment data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19(12), 7452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127452 (2022).
Huang, W. H., Hsu, H. Y., Chang, B. C. C. & Chang, F. C. Factors correlated with success rate of outpatient smoking cessation services in Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(6), 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061218 (2018).
Shiffman, S. et al. Smoking patterns and stimulus control in intermittent and daily smokers. PLoS ONE 9(3), e89911. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089911 (2014).
Chang, Y. C., Huang, W. H., Tsai, C. Y. & Hwang, L. C. Comparisons of early and delayed abstainers and its effects on long-term smoking cessation in Taiwan. Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-019-0218-1 (2019).
Fagerstrom, K. O. & Schneider, N. G. Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. J. Behav. Med. 12(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00846549 (1989).
Fagerström, K. Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerström test for cigarette dependence. Nicotine Tob. Res. 14(1), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr137 (2012).
Huang, C. L., Lin, H. H. & Wang, H. H. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire as a measure of cigarette dependence. J. Adv. Nurs. 55(5), 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03951.x (2006).
Nagin, D. S. & Odgers, C. L. Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 6(1), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131413 (2010).
de Jong, V. M. et al. Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models. Stat. Med. 38(9), 1601–1619. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8063 (2019).
Loughran, T. & Nagin, D. S. Finite sample effects in group-based trajectory models. Sociol. Methods Res. 35(2), 250–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106292292 (2006).
Nguena Nguefack, H. L. et al. Trajectory modelling techniques useful to epidemiological research: A comparative narrative review of approaches. Clin. Epidemiol. 12, 1205–1222. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S265287 (2020).
Von Elm, E. et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010 (2007).
Arancini, L. et al. Age as a predictor of quit attempts and quit success in smoking cessation: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four-Country survey (2002–14). Addiction 116(9), 2509–2520. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15454 (2021).
Qiu, D., Chen, T., Liu, T. & Song, F. Smoking cessation and related factors in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: Evidence from a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 15(10), e0240806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240806 (2020).
Chen, H., Zhao, B., Li, X., Xie, R. & Li, W. Nicotine dependence, perceived behavioral control, descriptive quitting norms, and intentions to quit smoking among Chinese male regular smokers. Subst. Use Misuse 56(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2020.1846195 (2021).
Mersha, A. G., Eftekhari, P., Bovill, M., Tollosa, D. N. & Gould, G. S. Evaluating level of adherence to nicotine replacement therapy and its impact on smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Public Health 79, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00550-2 (2021).
Raupach, T. et al. A systematic review of studies assessing the association between adherence to smoking cessation medication and treatment success. Addiction 109(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12319 (2014).
Zhou, C. et al. Evaluation of smoking cessation intervention in patients with chronic diseases in smoking cessation clinics. Medicine 96(42), e7459. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007459 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the participants who shared their experiences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CHL and SYF designed the study; CYW, KFC, and SPC collected the data; WTH and SYF analyzed the data; CHL and SYF wrote the initial manuscript; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, CH., Wang, CY., Chen, KF. et al. The trajectory of smoking cessation after treatment and its related factors in Taiwan. Sci Rep 14, 13270 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64311-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64311-1
- Springer Nature Limited