Abstract
We previously identified that serum EFNA1 and MMP13 were potential biomarker for early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, our aim is to explore the diagnostic value of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 for gastric cancer. We used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect the expression levels of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 in 210 GCs and 223 normal controls. The diagnostic value of EFNA1 and MMP13 was evaluated in an independent cohorts of GC patients and normal controls (n = 238 and 195, respectively). Receiver operating characteristics were used to calculate diagnostic accuracy. In training and validation cohorts, serum EFNA1 and MMP13 levels in the GC groups were significantly higher than those in the normal controls (P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined detection of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 for GC was improved (0.794), compared with single biomarker used. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Importantly, the combined measurement of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 to detect early-stage GC also had acceptable diagnostic accuracy in training and validation cohort. Combined detection of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 could help identify early-stage GC, suggesting that it may be a promising tool for the early detection of GC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common and deadly malignant tumors in the world. Although morbidity and mortality are declining worldwide, GC is still the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths1. In recent years, there have been for over one million new cases of GC, making it the fifth most common malignant tumor in the world1. Among them, cases reported in China account for a large proportion2,3. It is reported that the long-term survival rate of patients with advanced GC was less than 30%4. Studies have shown that the 5-year survival rate of patients with early stage of GC exceeds 90%, who were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection5. Consequently, the identification of effective approaches to detect early stage GC is the key to improving GC patients survival.
Early detection of tumors is the most desirable approach in the management of GC. Noteworthily, the conventional serological tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and CA72-4 are inadequate for detecting GC due to their poor sensitivity and specificity6,7,8. Although endoscopy combined with pathological results is the gold standard for the diagnosis of GC, its acceptability is poor and it is difficult to be used for large-scale clinical screening9,10. Therefore, it is necessary to explore potential biomarkers related to GC and try to bring new ideas to the research of early diagnosis and detection, targeted therapy, and long-term monitoring of GC. In this regard, cell-free proteins in the serum have the potential to be a safer diagnostic biomarker in GC.
A large number of studies have shown that EFNA1 is often overexpressed in human gastrointestinal tumors such as CRC, EC and HCC, and the degree of up-regulation of EFNA1 is closely related to tumor malignancy, metastasis potential and patient prognosis11,12. In addition, studies have also shown that MMP13 is overexpressed in tumors, such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, breast cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, making it a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target13. MMP13 is also a key factor in tumor tissue invasiveness, metastasis, and prognosis14. EFNA1 and MMP13, as secreted proteins, are overexpressed in many cancers, but their expression in normal tissues is very low or undetectable, suggesting their potential as serum diagnostic markers. Therefore, this article explored the diagnostic efficacy of a new serological marker EFNA1 combined with MMP13 for early GC.
EFNA1 is a membrane protein anchored on the cell surface through glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) bonds15. It is a protein product secreted by human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) stimulated by tumor necrosis factor (TNF). EFNA1 binds to many Eph A receptors (EphA1-5)16,17 and is a good in vitro molecular marker of endothelial cells18. However, the diagnostic value of serum EFNA1 for GC has not been confirmed. As a member of Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), MMP13 belongs to a type of collagenase. Its main physiological role is to destroy type II collagen and plays an important role in extracellular matrix circulation, cancer cell migration, cell growth, inflammation, and angiogenesis19,20. MMP13 was first discovered in breast cancer, and more and more researches have been conducted in the diagnosis of bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, and other common tumors21,22,23. However, there are few studies on MMP13 in the diagnosis of GC, especially in serology.
We have recently reported that an integrated Five-Biomarker Panel (iFBPanel) (EFNA1, MMP13, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and squmaous cell carcinoma antigen) might be used as a blood biomarker-based tool to identify early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)24. Study found that serum EFNA1 and MMP13 levels in early-stage and all-stage ESCC patients were significantly higher than those in normal controls24. In addition, the diagnostic performance of EFNA1 combined with MMP13 was superior to that of EFNA1 or MMP13 alone. And this is similar to the data we found in the GC, which provided evidences for serum EFNA1 combined with MMP13 may be a biomarker for diagnosis of GC.
Results
Screening of EFNA1 and MMP13 in GC
First, by the integrated analysis of ChIP-Seq, RNA-sequence, secretome data, GEO databases and measurement of a small size of clinical samples by ELISA, serum EFNA1 and MMP13 were identified as secreted proteins encoded by super enhancer driven genes24. Then, we analyzed the levels of EFNA1 and MMP13 in GC cell lines and tissues and their relationships with the prognosis of GC patients through transcriptional open data sets (CCLE, GEPIA and Kaplan–Meier Plotter). Compared with other cancers, EFNA1 and MMP13 were highly or moderately expressed in GC (Supplementary Fig. S1A). Moreover, according to TCGA data, we found that EFNA1 and MMP13 were up-regulated in GC (Supplementary Fig. S1B). After Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test, EFNA1 and MMP13, were identified to show prognostic value in GC (Supplementary Fig. S1C). Based on the comprehensive analysis of the above results, EFNA1 and MMP13 were screened as potential diagnostic biomarkers for GC.
The levels of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 in GC patients and normal controls
Figure 1 shows that the study recruited a total of 433 participants, of which 238 were in the training cohort and 195 were in the validation cohort. Table 1 summarizes the clinicopathological characteristics of GC patients in the two cohorts. The average concentration ± standard error (SEM) of EFNA1 in GC was 1.17 ± 0.52 ng/mL, while the normal controls and early-stage GC were 0.79 ± 0.33 ng/mL and 1.18 ± 0.51 ng/mL (Table 2). The mean serum MMP13 concentration ± SEM of the GC, normal controls and early-stage GC were 1.08 ± 0.71 ng/mL, 0.45 ± 0.30 ng/mL, and 1.25 ± 0.64 ng/mL, respectively (Table 2). As shown in Fig. 2A and Table 2, the serum EFNA1 and MMP13 levels of GC patients in the training cohort were higher than those in the normal controls, which was confirmed by statistics (P < 0.001). The difference between early-stage GC and normal controls was also significant (P < 0.001). Similar results were found in the validation cohort (Fig. 2B, Table 2). Subsequently, we analyzed the expression of EFNA1 and MMP13 in serum of GC patients in test cohort and validation cohort, and we found that EFNA1 and MMP13 levels did not differ significantly between different cohort (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Serum EFNA1 and MMP13 can be used as an early-diagnosis biomarker for patients with GC
The serum EFNA1 and MMP13 concentrations in patients with early-stage GC (TNM stage 0 + I + IIA) are similar to those in patients with all-stage GC, and both are significantly higher than those of normal controls (Table 2). Therefore, we tried to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 in patients with early-stage GC. ROC curve analysis indicated that the optimized cutoff values for EFNA1 and MMP13 to distinguish between GC and normal controls were 1.21 ng/ml and 1.03 ng/ml, respectively. In addition, the diagnostic efficiency of serum EFNA1 combined with MMP13 (AUC 0.794, sensitivity 55.7%, specificity 90.2%) in GC patients was significantly higher than the two single tests (EFNA1 (AUC 0.723, sensitivity 42.6%, specificity 90.2%), MMP13 (AUC 0.761, sensitivity 47.0%, specificity 90.2%)) (Fig. 3A and Table 3). In patients with early-stage GC, we also observed the diagnostic ability of serum EFNA1 combined with MMP13 to distinguish cancer patients from normal controls (AUC 0.865, sensitivity 48.5%, specificity 90.2%) (Fig. 3A and Table 3, Supplementary excel). Similar results were obtained in the comparison between GC patients, early-stage GC patients, and normal controls in the validation cohort (Fig. 3B and Table 3, Supplementary excel). These results together prove that serum EFNA1 combined with MMP13 can be used as a good biomarker for detecting early-stage GC.
Correlation between serum concentration of EFNA1/MMP13 and clinicopathological features
The relationship between serum EFNA1, MMP13 levels, and clinicopathological characteristics is shown in Table 4. The positive rate of serum EFNA1 + MMP13 was not significantly correlated with clinical data such as age, gender, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node status, TNM stage, early-stage or late-stage GC (all P > 0.05). The validation cohort also got similar results.
Discussion
There have been efforts to develop non-invasive biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Cancer cells are characterized by rapid growth, invasion, and metastasis with an abundant blood supply, which results in the constant release of tumor cells into the bloodstream. In this regard, blood-based biomarkers can reflect the real-time biological characteristics of tumors and have been recognized as emerging indicators for diagnosing cancer, detecting recurrence25,26,27, or monitoring treatment response of several malignant tumors28,29. Overall, this highlights the importance of developing a blood-based biomarker for the diagnosis of patients with GC.
In this study, we examined the levels of EFNA1 and MMP13 in sera from GC patients and normal controls, and the analysis revealed that EFNA1 and MMP13 were potential diagnostic biomarkers for GC. The EFNA1 combined with MMP13 demonstrated acceptable accuracy in the diagnosis of GC, especially for early-stage patients. The diagnostic values of EFNA1 combined with MMP13 were verified in the training cohort of 115 patients and 123 controls and in the independent validation cohort of 95 patients and 100 controls.
High sensitivity is an important indicator to avoid false-negative diagnoses. Herein, the optimized cut-off values we determined for EFNA1 and MMP13 are 1.21 ng/ml and 1.03 ng/ml, respectively. The sensitivities of EFNA1 and MMP13 at the optimal critical level were 42.6% and 47.0%, respectively, while the sensitivity of the combined application of the two markers increased to 55.7%. And the data were further verified in the validation cohort. Moreover, EFNA1 combined with MMP13 potentially demonstrated a better diagnostic sensitivity for early-stage GC patients than markers CEA and CA19-9, which are major serum tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancers currently used in clinical practice. The positive rates of CEA and CA19-9 in GC patients were reported to be only 25.5% and 38.7%, respectively, and these markers are elevated most commonly in advanced-stage patients30,31. In addition, the AUC of EFNA1 and MMP13 for diagnosing GC were 0.723 and 0.761, respectively, while the AUC of GC using both two tumor markers was 0.794. The robustness of the diagnostic features was confirmed in two independent cohorts. The diagnostic efficiency for early-stage GC was in accordance with our previous studies on assessing EFNA1 combined with MMP13 for early-stage ESCC24. This result suggests that if asymptomatic population are detected with positive result of EFNA1 combined with MMP13, they should be considered at higher risk for suffering from GC or ESCC.
As a member of the EFN family, EFNA1 widely participates in tumorigenesis by influencing tumor angiogenesis and malignant cell phenotypes. In GC, a higher expression of EFNA1 was found in most samples, and its expression was related to tumor stage, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and recurrence32. In addition, EFNA1 was detected in the supernatant of most of the authentic Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines, and elevated serum EFNA1 levels were noted for HCC patients by comparing to the patients with liver cirrhosis33. Moreover, our previous studies also showed that the expression of serum EFNA1 in ESCC was significantly higher than that of normal controls indicating EFNA1 as a novel serum marker for the detection of cancers. Here, we showed the potential utility of EFNA1 in the early diagnosis of GC which furtherly confirms the crucial role of soluble EFNA1 in the progression of tumors. MMPs are matrix enzymes belonging to the zinc-calcium-dependent family of endopeptidases. It can cleave ephrinA1, suggesting a biological relevance of EFNA1 and MMP1334. MMP13 plays a role in the degradation of basement membrane and extracellular components, destroys the histological barrier of tumor invasion, and promotes tumor invasion and migration20. In GC, MMP13 was reported to be up-regulated in tumor tissues and its positive expression was related to poorer survival35. In this study, we further revealed the higher level of MMP13 in the serum of GC patients by comparing it to the normal control and MMP13 might serve as a biomarker for early-stage GC.
Although our study shows for the first time that the detection of serum EFNA1 combined with MMP13 can play an auxiliary role in the diagnosis of GC, there are still some limitations in this study. Firstly, this prospective study selected relatively simple tissue types (only gastric adenocarcinoma). Therefore, to further verify the role of EFNA1 combined with MMP13 in the diagnosis of GC, it is necessary to conduct retrospective studies on multi-centers, large samples, and multiple tissue types [such as gastric malt and Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)]. Secondly, there are no strict restrictions on the types of gastritis control cases, and some diseases that may affect serum EFNA1 and MMP13 levels, such as infection, ischemia, and diabetes, are also not considered. In addition, changes in serum EFNA1 and MMP13 concentrations may help to dynamically monitor the prognosis of GC patients undergoing surgical treatment. However, due to the small number of cases, we did not evaluate the changes in the expression levels of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 before and after surgery in GC patients. This study did not further detect the correlation between EFNA1 and MMP13 expression levels in GC tissues and serum expression levels. This is indeed a point where we have not considered morality, and it is the direction we need to work on in the future. Finally, we only tested the diagnostic efficacy of EFNA1 combined with MMP13 for ESCC and GC. Since most of the tumor markers identified so far are not specific to a particular tumor type, we can speculate that EFNA1 combined with MMP13 may also have potential diagnostic value for other tumor types, which needs future evaluation.
In conclusion, our study shows that the levels of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 in GC patients are significantly increased. In addition, the combined detection of EFNA1 and MMP13 significantly improves the diagnostic efficiency of GC and early-stage GC, indicating that EFNA1 combined with MMP13 may be an independent tumor marker for GC patients, and the combined detection of the two tumor markers is helpful for the diagnosis of GC.
Materials and methods
Study samples
In this study, we selected the examination information of patients who were examined in the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from June 2013 to May 2019 and included 115 GC patients and 123 healthy controls as the training cohort for research. In addition, 95 GC patients and 100 healthy controls collected from March 2018 to September 2019 in the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center were selected as the validation cohort. The patients included in the analysis met the following criteria: (1) All patients meet the diagnostic criteria for primary GC and were diagnosed as GC by histopathological examination; (2) GC patients did not have any cancer or received any anti-cancer treatment before diagnosis; (3) Their clinical data is complete. All healthy controls were qualified blood donors without previous malignant diseases. In this study, all serum results were obtained before the start of treatment. The collected serum samples were coagulated at room temperature for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 1250g for 5 min. Finally, store them in a refrigerator at − 80 °C until the start of the experiment.
According to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual36, we have staged GC, in which AJCC stage 0 + I + IIA tumors are defined as early-stage GC. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College and Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, and the informed consent of all participants was obtained. All work is in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Analysis of expression in cancer cell line encyclopedia (CCLE)
We downloaded the expression data of these proteins in various cell lines from CCLE and analyzed their expression differences in GC and other tumor cell lines.
Analysis of expression and survival in public data set
We used GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) to analysis EFNA1 and MMP13 expression in GC tissues. Then, we are with Kaplan–Meier Plotter online website (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) analysis of the two kinds of protein's relationship with the prognosis of patients with GC.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for EFNA1 and MMP13
ELISA kit was used to detect the expression levels of serum EFNA1(Cusabio, CSB-EL007460HU) and MMP13 (Cusabio, CSB-E04674h). We prepared reagents, samples, and standards following the manufacturer's instructions. Through preliminary experiments, we determined that the best dilution ratio of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 is 1:2 and 1:6. Then, add 100 μl of standards and samples to each well of a 96-well plate and incubate at 37 °C for 2 h. Discard the liquid in the well, add 100 μl of biotin antibody (1×) to the well plate, and incubate at 37 °C for 1 h. Wash the plate 3 times with a microplate washer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), then add 100 μl HRP avidin (1×) to each well and incubate at 37 °C for 1 h. Next, after washing 5 times, 90 μl of TMB substrate was added to each well and then incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Add 50 μl stop solution to stop the color reaction, and read the optical density (OD) values at 450 nm and 590 nm wavelengths on the plate microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Use the standard curve method to convert the measured OD value into a concentration, and then multiply it by the sample dilution factor to obtain the final concentration of serum EFNA1 and MMP13. Each serum sample is in duplicate, and the average is taken for analysis.
Statistical analysis
We used the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test to compare the expression levels of EFNA1 and MMP13 in serum of GC patients and normal controls. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each group. When the specificity is > 90%, we select the optimum cut-off values by maximizing the sensitivity of the curve coordinates and minimizing the distance from the corresponding point in the ROC curve to the upper left corner. The specificity of > 90% was chosen to produce a detection method that is economical, feasible, and suitable for early detection37. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of EFNA1, MMP13, and EFNA1 + MMP13 in diagnosing GC to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy. We used the chi-square test to compare the relationship between the expression level of EFNA1 + MMP13 and clinical characteristics in the training cohort and the validation cohort. The significance of all analyses is P < 0.05.
We used logistics regression analysis to fit EFNA1 and MMP13 into one variable. In the test cohort, we calculate it according to the following formula: ln (\(\frac{p}{1-p}\)) = − 2.95 + 1.552X1 + 1.967X2; In the validation cohort, we calculate it according to the following formula: ln (\(\frac{p}{1-p}\)) = − 4.36 + 2.284X1 + 2.317X2 (X1 is the serum expression level of EFNA1 in GC, X2 is the serum expression level of MMP13 in GC).
Ethics approval
Approval of the research protocol by an institutional review board: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee at the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (2015042419) and the School of Medicine and Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre (GZR2015-015).
Consent to participate
Informed consents were obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71(3), 209–249 (2021).
Rahman, R., Asombang, A. W. & Ibdah, J. A. Characteristics of gastric cancer in Asia. World J. Gastroenterol. 20(16), 4483–4490 (2014).
Yang, L., Parkin, D. M., Ferlay, J., Li, L. & Chen, Y. Estimates of cancer incidence in China for 2000 and projections for 2005. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 14(1), 243–250 (2005).
Coburn, N. et al. Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat. Rev. 63, 104–115 (2018).
Sumiyama, K. Past and current trends in endoscopic diagnosis for early stage gastric cancer in Japan. Gastric Cancer 20(Suppl 1), 20–27 (2017).
Katai, H. et al. Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: A retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2001–2007). Gastric Cancer 21(1), 144–154 (2018).
Feng, F. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 17(1), 737 (2017).
Li, J. et al. Multiple cytokine profiling in serum for early detection of gastric cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 24(21), 2269–2278 (2018).
Gaddam, S. & Edmundowicz, S. A. Endoscopic tumor diagnosis and treatment. Gastrointest. Endosc. 78(3), 421–427 (2013).
European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working G et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: Overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy 45(1), 51–59 (2013).
Hao, Y. & Li, G. Role of EFNA1 in tumorigenesis and prospects for cancer therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 130, 110567 (2020).
Chu, L. Y. et al. FNA1 in gastrointestinal cancer: Expression, regulation and clinical significance. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 14(5), 973–988 (2022).
Pendás, A. M. et al. An overview of collagenase-3 expression in malignant tumors and analysis of its potential value as a target in antitumor therapies. Clin. Chim. Acta 291, 137–155 (2000).
Zhang, X. H. et al. Pan-cancer analysis reveals the associations between MMP13 high expression and carcinogenesis and its value as a serum diagnostic marker. Aging (Albany NY) 15(6), 2115–2135 (2023).
Kullander, K. & Klein, R. Mechanisms and functions of Eph and ephrin signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3(7), 475–486 (2002).
Jellinghaus, S. et al. Ephrin-A1/EphA4-mediated adhesion of monocytes to endothelial cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1833(10), 2201–2211 (2013).
Coulthard, M. G. et al. Characterization of the Epha1 receptor tyrosine kinase: Expression in epithelial tissues. Growth Factors 18(4), 303–317 (2001).
Wada, Y. et al. A multi-gene transcriptional profiling approach to the discovery of cell signature markers. Cytotechnology 63(1), 25–33 (2011).
Gialeli, C., Theocharis, A. D. & Karamanos, N. K. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J. 278(1), 16–27 (2011).
Chang, H. J. et al. MMP13 is potentially a new tumor marker for breast cancer diagnosis. Oncol. Rep. 22(5), 1119–1127 (2009).
Zhao, H. et al. CCL17-CCR4 axis promotes metastasis via ERK/MMP13 pathway in bladder cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 120, 1979–1989 (2018).
Eiro, N. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 and matrix metalloproteases 11 and 13 as predictors of tumor recurrence and survival in stage II colorectal cancer. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 25(4), 1589–1597 (2019).
Chen, L. et al. Integrated analysis of HPV-mediated immune alterations in cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 149(2), 248–255 (2018).
Chu, L. Y. et al. Secreted proteins encoded by super enhancer-driven genes could be promising biomarkers for early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed. J. 27, 100662 (2023).
Diehl, F. et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat. Med. 14(9), 985–990 (2008).
Hamana, K. et al. Monitoring of circulating tumour-associated DNA as a prognostic tool for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 92(12), 2181–2184 (2005).
Sozzi, G. et al. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in plasma at diagnosis and during follow-up of lung cancer patients. Cancer Res. 61(12), 4675–4678 (2001).
Gevensleben, H. et al. Noninvasive detection of HER2 amplification with plasma DNA digital PCR. Clin. Cancer Res. 19(12), 3276–3284 (2013).
Spindler, K. L., Pallisgaard, N., Vogelius, I. & Jakobsen, A. Quantitative cell-free DNA, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan. Clin. Cancer Res. 18(4), 1177–1185 (2012).
Yang, A. P. et al. CA72-4 combined with CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta 437, 183–186 (2014).
He, C. Z. et al. Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 13, 87 (2013).
Nakamura, R. et al. EPHA2/EFNA1 expression in human gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 96(1), 42–47 (2005).
Cui, X. D. et al. EFNA1 ligand and its receptor EphA2: Potential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 126(4), 940–949 (2010).
Beauchamp, A. et al. EphrinA1 is released in three forms from cancer cells by matrix metalloproteases. Mol. Cell Biol. 32(16), 3253–3264 (2012).
Sheibani, S. et al. Expression analysis of matrix metalloproteinase-13 in human gastric cancer in the presence of Helicobacter Pylori infection. Cancer Biomark. 18(4), 349–356 (2017).
Amin, M. B. et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67(2), 93–99 (2017).
Boyle, P. et al. Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 22(2), 383–389 (2011).
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871921, 81773138 and 81972801), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province-Outstanding Youth Project (2019B151502059), the Science and Technology Special Fund of Guangdong Province of China (220809087500263; 210729156901797; 190829105556145), and the 2020 Li Ka Shing Foundation Cross-Disciplinary Research Project Fund (2020LKSFG01B).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.C. wrote original draft, F.W. formal analysis, H.G. methodology, J.X. investigation, Q.Q. and X.L. resources, Y.X. writing-review and editing, Y.P. project administration, B.Q. conceptualization, writing-review and editing, visualization. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chu, LY., Wu, FC., Guo, HP. et al. Combined detection of serum EFNA1 and MMP13 as diagnostic biomarker for gastric cancer. Sci Rep 14, 15957 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65839-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65839-y
- Springer Nature Limited