Abstract
Cognitive impairment can potentially become a significant health concern in older adults. However, early effective diagnostic methods are still lacking. Therefore, we utilized the NHANES database in the US to investigate the relationship between serum uric acid to serum creatinine (SUA/SCR) ratio and cognitive impairment. In our study, a total of 3874 participants were included (2001–2002, 2011–2014). Weighted t tests or chi-square tests were utilized to analyze the basic characteristics of the population. Weighted logistic regression analysis, smooth-fit curves, threshold effects, and subgroup analysis were conducted to investigate the correlation between the SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment. In this study, the SUA/SCR was significantly lower in individuals with cognitive impairment. The logistic regression model, after adjusting for all covariates, revealed that the Q2–Q4 were 0.65 (95% CI 0.49, 0.86), 0.60 (95% CI 0.40, 0.90), 0.55 (95% CI 0.39, 0.77) respectively. This indicates that participants in the Q4 had a 45% reduced risk of cognitive impairment. Smooth-fit curves and threshold effect analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment, with a turning point at 4.13. Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences in the relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment among different subgroups (P > 0.05). Our findings indicate a negative correlation between the SUA/SCR and the risk of cognitive impairment in the population of adults aged 60 and above in the US. This suggests that the SUA/SCR holds promise as a potential indicator for cognitive impairment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With increasing global life expectancy, cognitive impairment has the potential to become a major health challenge for older adults. However, without preventive measures to delay cognitive impairment, the progression of the condition will worsen, eventually leading to the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1. It has been reported that in the United States alone, there were approximately 6.2 million AD patients in 2021, and it is projected to reach 13.8 million by 20262. As the progression from cognitive impairment to AD is continuous and irreversible, and there are currently no effective treatments available3, it is crucial to identify and mitigate modifiable factors as early as possible.
Serum uric acid (SUA) is the end product of purine and uric acid(UA) metabolism4, serving as both an indicator of renal function and an effective antioxidant in the human body5,6. SUA levels depend on the balance between dietary purine intake, xanthine oxidase activity, and renal excretion of UA7. Disruption of this balance can lead to hyperuricemia or hypouricemia. Research has indicated that SUA may have a protective effect on cognitive impairment8. Serum creatinine (SCR) is a byproduct of muscle metabolism and a common biomarker used to assess renal function9. However, 90% of serum uric acid is filtered and reabsorbed by the kidneys10,11. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the impact of renal function when assessing the correlation between SUA and cognitive impairment. Recent studies have shown that the serum uric acid/serum creatinine ratio (SUA/SCR) as a novel biomarker believed to better reflect endogenous UA levels12. It has been reported that the SUA/SCR ratio is associated with the progression and prognosis of chronic kidney disease, metabolic syndrome, and respiratory system diseases13,14,15. However, the relationship between the SUA/SCR ratio and cognitive impairment has not been widely explored.
Common methods for assessing cognitive function include psychological tests, questionnaires, imaging examinations, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis16,17. Compared to other testing methods, serum biomarkers offer advantages in terms of objectivity and accessibility, making them more suitable for the early identification of cognitive impairment. Similarly, there is a lack of targeted early interventions for cognitive impairment. Therefore, based on the current situation, this study aims to select participants aged 60 and above from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to investigate the potential association between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment.
Method
Data sources and study population
NHANES is a research program to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in America. This study utilized data from the 2001–2002 and 2011–2014 NHANES cycles for analysis. Prior to data collection, all research procedures were authorized by the Ethics Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study followed the guiding principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
In the 2001–2002 and 2011–2014 NHANES data, a total of 37,519 participants were included. Participants under the age of 60, those lacking data on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), SUA/SCR, education level, marital status, smoking, alcohol consumption, blood pressure, and cholesterol were excluded. Finally, our study included data from 3874 participants Fig. 1.
Study variables
Cognitive impairment
The DSST is a test that requires participants to accurately encode a series of symbols within 120 s. This test assesses the participants’ reaction speed, attention, spatial perception, associative learning, and memory, making it a sensitive indicator of cognitive function18. As there is no established DSST score threshold to define cognitive impairment, we defined cognitive impairment (DSST < 33) using the lowest unweighted quartile of DSST scores among the study participants, consistent with previous research methods19.
SUA/SCR
The SCR concentration was measured using the timed endpoint method with the DxC800. The DxC800 utilizes the Jaffe rate method (kinetic alkaline picrate) in the modular chemistry section to determine the concentration of SUA.
Covariates
The variables included age, gender, race, marital status, BMI, education level, hypertension, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Race was categorized as Mexican American, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, other Hispanic, and other race. Marital status was divided into married/cohabiting, widowed/divorced/separated, and never married. BMI was categorized as < 25 kg/m2, 25–30 kg/m2, and > 30 kg/m2. Alcohol consumption was defined as consuming at least 12 alcoholic beverages per year, and smoking is defined as smoking at least 100 cigarettes over a lifetime20. Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were defined as being informed by a healthcare professional, while diabetes was defined as being informed by a healthcare professional or having a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥ 6.5 mmol/L or fasting blood glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L.
Statistical analysis
We selected “wtmec2yr” as the weighting variable for the years 2001–2002 and 2011–2014. This is consistent with previous research methods21. We conducted weighted t tests or chi-square tests to analyze the data of continuous and categorical variables for the basic characteristics. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard error, while categorical variables are presented as 95% confidence intervals. To assess the association between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment, we employed weighted logistic regression analysis. In Non-adjusted Model, no adjustment for confounding factors was made. In Partially adjusted model, we included adjustments for age and race. In Full adjusted model, we included age, gender, race, education, marital status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, BMI, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes for adjustment. Furthermore, after adjusting for all covariates, we employed a generalized additive model (GAM) and smooth curve fitting to observe non-linear correlations. In the presence of non-linear correlations, a segmented regression model was used to estimate threshold effects. The recursive experimental approach was utilized to identify the best-fitting model with the maximum likelihood value and determine the inflection point22. Finally, we performed subgroup analysis using a stratified multivariable logistic regression model to assess the correlation between SUA/SCR and cognitive function. The stratification variables included gender, age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes. These stratification variables were also considered potential effect modifiers. The interaction terms were evaluated using likelihood ratio tests to assess their heterogeneity. All data were analyzed using R (version 4.2.0) and SPSS (version 27).
Institutional review board statement
The NHANES survey protocol was approved by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics Institutional Research Ethics Review Board.
Results
Baseline characteristics of the study population
A total of 3874 individuals participated in this study, with 1900 males and 1974 females. The study population was divided into two groups based on the lowest quartile score of DSST: individuals with DSST < 33 were classified as having cognitive impairment, while those with DSST ≥ 33 were classified as having noncognitive impairment. Noncognitive impairment was more prevalent among the Non-Hispanic White population, individuals with higher education levels, and those without hypertension. On the other hand, cognitive impairment was more commonly observed among females, older individuals, and those who reported alcohol consumption (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the SUA/SCR ratio was significantly lower in the cognitive impairment group (P < 0.05). Table 1
Association between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment
To further investigate the relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive function, we employed a weighted logistic regression model to analyze their association. When adjusting for covariates, the fourth quartile of SUA/SCR showed a 43% reduction in cognitive impairment risk compared to the first quartile (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.46, 0.71). After adjusting for some covariates, age, and race, we observed the same trend. After adjusting for all covariates, Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.00, 0.65 (0.49, 0.86), 0.60 (0.40, 0.90), and 0.55 (0.39, 0.77), respectively. Compared to the first quartile, participants in the fourth quartile had a 45% reduced risk of cognitive impairment (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39, 0.77), P for trend = 0.003. Table 2
Using a generalized additive model, we explored whether there was a linear relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment
To validate the reliability and stability of the logistic regression analysis results, we conducted an analysis using a generalized additive model while adjusting for all covariates. We observed a nonlinear association between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, through threshold effects, we identified a turning point at 4.13. On the left side of the turning point, the effect size was 0.611 (95% CI 0.487, 0.767), and on the right side of the turning point, the effect size was 0.930 (95% CI 0.868, 0.997). A log likelihood ratio < 0.001. The above results indicated that a nonlinear relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment Fig. 2 and Table 3
Subgroup analysis results of the association between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment
Further subgroup analysis revealed that SUA/SCR was significantly associated with cognitive impairment (P < 0.05) in the subgroups stratified by age, smoking status, drinking status, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes. The correlation between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment in the population with BMI < 25 and in the male population was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). This lack of significance may be attributed to the relatively small proportion of individuals in these two categories. The interaction analysis indicated no statistically significant differences in the relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment among different subgroups, suggesting that gender, age, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes did not significantly affect this negative correlation (P > 0.05) Fig. 3.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first investigation of the relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment among older adults in NHANES dataset. In this cross-sectional study, after adjusting for demographic, examination, and personal data of participants from the NHANES database in 2001–2002 and 2011–2014, we found a significant increase in the risk of cognitive impairment associated with a decrease in the SUA/SCR ratio. Additionally, through smooth curve fitting, we discovered a nonlinear relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment. The threshold effects analysis revealed a turning point at 4.13, and when SUA/SCR was below or above 4.13, both were independent risk factors for cognitive impairment. The subgroup analysis results indicated that, except for the subgroup of BMI < 25 and males, the association between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment was statistically significant in the remaining subgroups. The lack of significance in these two subgroups may be attributed to the relatively small proportion of individuals. The results of the interaction analysis suggest that this association is consistent across different populations. Our research findings suggest that SUA/SCR exhibits a certain degree of stability in patients with cognitive impairment. In the future, SUA/SCR may serve as an effective indicator for assessing cognitive impairment.
Cognitive impairment initially manifests as memory loss, decreased executive function, language deficits, or impairments in visual-spatial abilities23,24. The specific mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment remain incompletely understood, and effective treatments are currently lacking25,26. Furthermore, the occurrence of cognitive impairment greatly diminishes the quality of life for individuals affected, and without effective intervention, it poses an increasing economic burden on nations, families, and individuals27. Therefore, early detection and intervention to modify contributing factors are of paramount importance.
As the end product of purine metabolism, UA maintains a steady balance through the combined effects of endogenous production, exogenous supply, excretion, and reabsorption. In recent years, many studies have focused on the relationship between uric acid and the development and prognosis of cognitive dysfunction. However, whether UA is a protective or risk factor for cognitive function remains controversial. A meta-analysis in 2023 demonstrated no significant association between SUA levels and the risk of cognitive impairment28. In contrast, some studies support the protective role of SUA against cognitive impairment. Barbara Iazzolino et al. found that high SUA significantly prevented cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis29. A retrospective study emphasized the neuroprotective effect of high UA levels (> 237 mmol/L), possibly attributed to uric acid’s antioxidant properties30. Zelin Yuan et al. cross-sectional study on 6509 participants revealed an association between lower SUA and poorer cognitive function in females31. A prospective study found that low plasma UA levels had potential harmful effects on cognition32. Since 90% of UA in the serum is filtered and reabsorbed by the kidneys, UA levels in the blood are strongly influenced by renal function. Studies have shown that the effect of UA on cognitive impairment depends on renal function10,11. Therefore, assessing the relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment necessitates considering the influence of renal function. Research has found that SUA/SCR serves as a high-quality biomarker reflecting endogenous UA levels33,34.
In this study, we found that individuals with lower SUA/SCR ratios had a higher risk of cognitive impairment. In a recent prospective study involving 508 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), an investigation and analysis of cognitive impairment in PD patients revealed that a decrease in the UA to creatinine ratio was associated with increased accumulation of total-tau and phosphorylated-tau in cerebrospinal fluid. The study concluded that a decrease in the UA to creatinine ratio predicts the worsening of cognitive function in PD patients over time35. This finding is consistent with our research results. In our study, we observed a nonlinear negative correlation between SUA/SCR and the risk of cognitive impairment, where lower SUA/SCR ratios were associated with an increased risk of higher cognitive impairment. Additionally, the threshold effects analysis showed significant statistical significance on both sides of the turning point. Similarly, in our interaction analysis, we found that the relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment was not significantly influenced by the covariates we included. This suggests that SUA/SCR may have promising prospects in predicting cognitive impairment.
The exact mechanism by which the SUA/SCR ratio is involved in the development and prognosis of cognitive impairment remains unclear. Research has found that UA, an antioxidant, is produced during hypoxia36,37. However, oxidative stress in neurons is one of the main mechanisms influencing cognitive impairment38. Preclinical studies have shown that UA, as a natural antioxidant, can alleviate behavioral and cognitive impairments in MPTP-induced PD mice by activating the Nrf2-ARE pathway, thereby acting as a neuroprotectant by regulating neuroinflammation and oxidative stress39. Therefore, we speculate that the antioxidant action of SUA may be one of the protective mechanisms protecting against cognitive impairment, and lower uric acid levels may make patients more susceptible to cognitive impairment when renal function is similar.
Our study has several advantages compared to previous articles. First, we had a large sample size and applied weighted data analysis. Second, the smoothed fitted curves constructed based on a fully adjusted model helped us identify potential linear relationships. Finally, considering the possible impact of covariates on the results, our subgroup analysis may help to verify the stability of the results. However, our study also has certain limitations. For instance, the NHANES database is a cross-sectional survey, so we can only analyze the correlation between the SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment, and cannot investigate the causal relationship among them. Therefore, prospective studies are needed to verify these causal relationships, which will be a focus of our future research. Additionally, despite our efforts to include as many covariates as possible, we cannot entirely eliminate the interference of other potential confounding factors.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study findings suggest a negative correlation between the SUA/SCR ratio and the risk of cognitive impairment among older adults aged 60 and above in the United States. Further prospective studies are needed in the future to verify the potential mechanisms underlying this relationship.
Informed consent
All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are freely available without restriction in the NHANES repository. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm).
References
Jessen, F. et al. The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. Lancet Neurol. 19(3), 271–278 (2020).
Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 17(3), 327–406 (2021).
Wei, L. et al. Parietal-hippocampal rTMS improves cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease and increases dynamic functional connectivity of default mode network. Psychiatry Res. 315, 114721 (2022).
Wang, D. et al. Eurycoma longifolia alkaloid components ameliorate hyperuricemic nephropathy via regulating serum uric acid level and relieving inflammatory reaction. J. Nat. Med. 77(4), 867–879 (2023).
Ames, B. N., Cathcart, R., Schwiers, E. & Hochstein, P. Uric acid provides an antioxidant defense in humans against oxidant- and radical-caused aging and cancer: A hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78(11), 6858–6862 (1981).
Chen, C. J. et al. MyD88-dependent IL-1 receptor signaling is essential for gouty inflammation stimulated by monosodium urate crystals. J. Clin. Invest. 116(8), 2262–2271 (2006).
Tana, C. et al. Management of hyperuricemia and gout in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Postgrad. Med. 130(6), 523–535 (2018).
Chen, C. et al. Association of blood uric acid and cognitive impairment in oldest-old aged 80 years and older in 9 longevity areas of China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 55(1), 39–44 (2021).
Mathur, M. et al. A phase 2 trial of sibeprenlimab in patients with IgA nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 390, 20 (2023).
Huang, S. et al. The association of serum uric acid with cognitive impairment and ATN biomarkers. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14, 943380 (2022).
Mijailovic, N. R., Vesic, K. & Borovcanin, M. M. The influence of serum uric acid on the brain and cognitive dysfunction. Front. Psychiatry 13, 828476 (2022).
Zhang, Y. et al. Serum uric acid: creatinine ratio (UCR) is associated with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 14, 1110102 (2023).
Chunlei, Y., Liubao, G., Tao, W. & Changying, X. The association between serum uric acid to creatinine ratio and renal disease progression in type 2 diabetic patients in Chinese communities. J. Diabetes Complicat. 33(7), 473–476 (2019).
She, D. et al. Serum uric acid to creatinine ratio and risk of metabolic syndrome in patients with overweight/obesity. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 16, 3007–3017 (2023).
Wen, J., Wei, C., Giri, M., Zhuang, R. & Shuliang, G. Association between serum uric acid/serum creatinine ratios and lung function in the general American population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2007–2012. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 10(1), e001513 (2023).
Jia, L. et al. Caffeine intake improves the cognitive performance of patients with chronic kidney disease. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 9, 976244 (2022).
Hou, X. H. et al. Multipredictor risk models for predicting individual risk of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Transl. Med. 21(1), 768 (2023).
Rosano, C. et al. Digit Symbol Substitution test and future clinical and subclinical disorders of cognition, mobility and mood in older adults. Age Ageing 45(5), 688–695 (2016).
Gong, Z., Song, W., Gu, M., Zhou, X. & Tian, C. Association between serum iron concentrations and cognitive impairment in older adults aged 60 years and older: A dose-response analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One 16(8), e0255595 (2021).
Zhou, T. et al. Association of cognitive impairment with the interaction between chronic kidney disease and depression: Findings from NHANES 2011–2014. BMC Psychiatry 24, 312 (2024).
Chen, J., Yang, N., Peng, Y., Zhou, H. & Li, Q. Association between nonfood pre- or probiotic use and cognitive function: Results from NHANES 2011–2014. Nutrients 15, 3408 (2023).
Qin, Z. et al. The association between weight-adjusted-waist index and abdominal aortic calcification in adults aged ≥ 40 years: Results from NHANES 2013–2014. Sci. Rep. 12, 20354 (2022).
Feng, J., Wu, Q., Zhang, D. & Chen, B. Y. Hippocampal impairments are associated with intermittent hypoxia of obstructive sleep apnea. Chin. Med. J. (Engl). 125(4), 696–701 (2012).
Liu, Y. et al. Predictor of cognitive impairment: Metabolic syndrome or circadian syndrome. BMC Geriatr. 23(1), 408 (2023).
Panza, F. et al. Depressive and biopsychosocial frailty phenotypes: Impact on late-life cognitive disorders. J. Alzheimers Dis. 94(3), 879–898 (2023).
Zhang, X. et al. Effects of DHA on cognitive dysfunction in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: The mediating roles of ApoE. Prog. Lipid Res. 93, 101256 (2023).
Wilfling, D. et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances in people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1(1), CD011881 (2023).
Liu, Q., Peng, M., Yang, T. & Si, G. Uric acid levels and risk of cognitive impairment: Dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PLoS One 18(11), e0293832 (2023).
Iazzolino, B. et al. High serum uric acid levels are protective against cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. 271, 955 (2023).
Wang, Y. F., Li, J. X., Sun, X. S., Lai, R. & Sheng, W. L. High serum uric acid levels are a protective factor against unfavourable neurological functional outcome in patients with ischaemic stroke. J. Int. Med. Res. 46(5), 1826–1838 (2018).
Yuan, Z. et al. Association of serum uric acid and fasting plasma glucose with cognitive function: A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 23(1), 271 (2023).
Huang, Y. et al. Association of plasma uric acid levels with cognitive function among non-hyperuricemia adults: A prospective study. Clin. Nutr. 41(3), 645–652 (2022).
Tao, J. et al. Serum uric acid to creatinine ratio and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal Chinese women. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(17), e19959 (2020).
Liu, Y. et al. Serum uric acid to serum creatinine ratio predicts neurological deterioration in branch atheromatous disease. Front. Neurol. 14, 1098141 (2023).
Qu, Y. et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate is a biomarker of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15, 1130833 (2023).
Chamorro, A. et al. Prognostic significance of uric acid serum concentration in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 33(4), 1048–1052 (2002).
Dhanesha, N. et al. Treatment with uric acid reduces infarct and improves neurologic function in female mice after transient cerebral ischemia. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 27(5), 1412–1416 (2018).
Zhang, X., Yang, S. B., Cheng, L., Ho, K. & Kim, M. S. Botanical mixture containing nitric oxide metabolite enhances neural plasticity to improve cognitive impairment in a vascular dementia rat model. Nutrients 15(20), 4381 (2023).
Huang, T. T., Hao, D. L., Wu, B. N., Mao, L. L. & Zhang, J. Uric acid demonstrates neuroprotective effect on Parkinson’s disease mice through Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 493(4), 1443–1449 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the participants involved in this study and to the entire NHANES staff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G Chen conceived the research idea, conducted data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. L Tong conducted data analysis. Q Ye reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, G., Tong, L. & Ye, Q. Association between the serum uric acid/serum creatinine ratio and cognitive function in older adults: NHANES in the United States. Sci Rep 14, 16312 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67580-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67580-y
- Springer Nature Limited