Abstract
Bacterial culturomics is a set of techniques to isolate and identify live bacteria from complex microbial ecosystems. Despite its potential to revolutionize microbiome research, bacterial culturomics has significant challenges when applied to human gut microbiome studies due to its labor-intensive nature. Therefore, we established a streamlined culturomics approach with minimal culture conditions for stool sample preincubation. We evaluated the suitability of non-selective medium candidates for maintaining microbial diversity during a 30-day incubation period based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis. Subsequently, we applied four culture conditions (two preincubation media under an aerobic/anaerobic atmosphere) to isolate gut bacteria on a large scale from eight stool samples of healthy humans. We identified 8141 isolates, classified into 263 bacterial species, including 12 novel species candidates. Our analysis of cultivation efficiency revealed that seven days of aerobic and ten days of anaerobic incubation captured approximately 91% and 95% of the identified species within each condition, respectively, with a synergistic effect confirmed when selected preincubation media were combined. Moreover, our culturomics findings expanded the coverage of gut microbial diversity compared to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing results. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the potential of a streamlined culturomics approach for the efficient isolation of gut bacteria from human stool samples. This approach might pave the way for the broader adoption of culturomics in human gut microbiome studies, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive understanding of this complex microbial ecosystem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The isolation and identification of all bacteria within a specific microbial ecosystem are challenging as they require extensive culturing conditions and boundless labor and time1. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as an effective strategy for determining microbial communities without the need for cultivation work, playing a significant role in advancing human gut microbiome research over the past two decades2,3. Notably, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing offers low-cost and high-throughput advantages, making it a valuable tool for analyzing numerous samples4,5. Additionally, shotgun metagenomic sequencing provides high resolution at the species level and even enables the prediction of unknown bacteria’s taxonomic position and function6,7. However, culture-independent methods have limitations, including the inability to cultivate and directly study bacteria assembling incomplete sequences, binning errors, and the failure to capture mobile genetic elements8,9. Furthermore, it is essential to note that since NGS technology relies on genetic information to predict bacterial characteristics and functions, experimental observation and verification are necessary10. Therefore, the limitations inherent in these genome-based approaches should be considered to achieve a robust analysis of the human gut microbiome.
Bacterial culturomics is a high-throughput-oriented cultivation strategy aiming to isolate, cultivate, and identify large-scale living bacterial strains or species from environments or tissue samples, such as the human intestine11. The resulting comprehensive bacterial culture collection is valuable for analyzing viable microbial composition within an ecosystem. This approach enables experimental verification of bacterial characteristics and interactions at the strain level, along with obtaining complete genomes of individual microorganisms, thus establishing a high-accuracy reference genome database12. Previous culturomics studies have shown its potential to address or complement the limitations of conventional cultivation methods and 16S rRNA gene amplicon/shotgun metagenome sequencing13,14. However, large-scale bacterial cultivation and identification still demand significant resources and workload15. The number of samples and culture conditions are critical factors in determining project scale16, while predicting and optimizing the most efficient culture conditions for specific microbial ecosystems remains a formidable challenge17,18.
In this study, we aimed to establish a streamlined culturomics approach with limited culture conditions. We evaluated three non-selective media based on their ability to maintain microbial diversity for a 30-day incubation period. In addition, we confirmed the efficiency and effectiveness of the simplified culture conditions by isolating bacteria in a large-scale. We presented the relationship between overall bacterial species diversity, the number of isolates and samples, and the isolation efficiency based on the preincubation period. Furthermore, we compared the culturomics results with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data to demonstrate the complementarity of both approaches and their implications for human gut microbiome research. The findings from our streamlined culturomics approach with minimal culture conditions not only showed the significant diversity of isolated species but also highlighted the practical applications of this approach in understanding the human gut microbiome.
Methods
Study design and ethical approval
This study involved collecting stool samples from healthy individuals. To evaluate the preincubation media, stool samples (n = 6) were obtained from three individuals at two different time points, with approval from the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University (IRB no. 2104/003-014). For the culturomics study, stool samples (n = 8) were collected from eight healthy individuals under approval from the Institutional Review Board of Soon Chun Hyang University Bucheon Hospital (IRB no. 2021–01-028–002). The protocols were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and regulations approved by each ethics committee. All participants provided informed and signed consent, with no biological samples collected from them other than fecal matter.
Sample collection and processing
The selection criteria for donors in this study included individuals who had resided in South Korea, had no medical history of metabolic or gastrointestinal diseases, and had abstained from fermented milk or probiotics for no less than three weeks prior to sample collection. Following the stool collection protocol of the Human Microbiome Project19, the donors were advised to store their samples immediately after defecation in a vacuum refrigerated container with a GasPak EZ anaerobe container system (Becton Dickinson, MD, USA) at 4 °C. The samples were transported to a laboratory within 24 h. All samples were processed in an anaerobic chamber containing 5% CO2, 10% H2, and 85% N2. The specimens were homogenized with sterilized saline and centrifuged at 15,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were discarded, and the pellets were resuspended in saline to a 0.25 g/L concentration and immediately used for preincubation. The remaining samples were stored at − 80 °C for DNA extraction later.
Preincubation of gut microbiota in vitro
The fecal suspension was mixed in 1–2 mm polysaccharide gel beads composed of 2.5% gellan gum, 0.25% xanthan gum, and 0.2% sodium citrate (w/v, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) for long-term cultivation20. These fecal gel beads were inoculated at a final concentration of 5 g of feces/L into a preincubation medium that was supplemented with 10% (v/v) of 0.22 μm-filtered rumen fluid and 10% (v/v) of defibrinated sheep blood. Rumen fluid supplementation was used to enhance the growth and diversity of bacteria by mimicking the gut environment21. The preparation process of rumen fluid and its ingredients are described in Supplementary Fig. S1 and Table S1. To evaluate the effectiveness of the preincubation medium, gut microbiota medium (GMM), blood culture tubes (BCT; BACT/ALERT FAN plus culture bottles, BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and modified Gifu Anaerobic Medium (mGAM; Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) were used. Supplementary Table S2 describes the detailed constituents of each medium. Preincubation was conducted at 37 °C in an anaerobic atmosphere. The culture solution was collected every five days during a 30-day incubation period to extract DNA for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Samples without preincubation were designated as day 0 or ‘initial.’
A streamlined bacterial culturomics approach
Our culturomics workflow is described in Fig. 1. Preincubation under anaerobic conditions was conducted at 37 °C in BCT and mGAM, supplemented with rumen fluid and sheep blood. Additionally, the same process was carried out under aerobic conditions to isolate aerotolerant and obligate aerobes simultaneously. The cultured medium was collected at regular intervals for 30 days, and then spread onto mGAM agar plates without any supplement after serial dilution in saline. We used mGAM as the sole medium for colony isolation and pure culture to enhance culturomics accessibility. To mitigate the number of species that become extinct due to dilution, we implemented a strategy to reduce the dilution factor by expanding the spreading area via a 500 cm2 square dish. The colonies were preferentially picked based on variations in colony morphology, as determined by the experimenter, with the remaining colonies being chosen randomly, which resulted in an average of 74 and 93 colonies for each plate collected from aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively. The isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS on a Biotyper Sirius system (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The spectra were compared with the MBT 8,468 MSPs library to obtain a score value for identification. Cases with score values below 1.69 were considered bacteria that did not have sufficient spectra or were not included in the library, such as new species. Some isolates with low scores were identified with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Genomic DNA was extracted using Chelex 100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA), and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′), yielding over 1,350 bp of 16S rRNA gene. Sequencing was conducted using an ABI PRISM 3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) at Solgent (Daejeon, South Korea). Strains with less than 98.65% sequence similarity to the phylogenetically closest type strain in the 16S rRNA gene were classified as potential new species. All identified isolates were cryopreserved in 10% glycerol at − 80 °C for long-term storage.
16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence-based analysis
The 16S rRNA gene amplicon was sequenced, targeting the V3–V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq system (Illumina Inc., CA, USA) by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea). Genomic DNA from the fecal suspension was extracted using a ZymoBIOMICS™ DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, CA, USA). Templates were prepared using the Illumina Nextera XT protocol with two amplification cycles and two clean-ups with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Inc., CA, USA)22. Sequence data was processed in the Integrated Microbial Next-Generation Sequencing pipeline23, demultiplexing sequences with a minimum read length of 200 bp. Before conducting sequence pairing, we trimmed the five bp-length of each side of the sequences. Clustering zero-radius operational taxonomic units (zOTUs) with a 97% sequence similarity was performed using USEARCH v.11.0. The minimum relative abundance of zOTU cutoff was set to 0.001. Sequence alignment and taxonomic classification were conducted based on SILVA (release 128) using the RDP classifier24. Processed files were imported into R and analyzed using the Rhea script25. Microbial alpha diversity was calculated after filtering based on a cutoff of a relative abundance of 0.25% in each community, which has been suggested as an “effective” portion of the community25,26. The neutral community model (NCM) was predicted within the phyloseq package27,28.
Statistical analysis and visualization
Statistical significance between the groups was calculated using one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal–Wallis test. In beta diversity analysis, permutational multivariate analysis of variance and permutational multivariate analysis of dispersion were used to determine the significance of the group distribution. Graphical visualization was performed in GraphPad Prism v.9.4.1, except for Venn diagrams, which were generated using Venny v.2.129.
Results
Evaluation of base medium for human stool preincubation
The primary purpose of preincubation is to distribute the workload while maintaining bacterial diversity for an extended period. We used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to evaluate non-selective media, BCT, mGAM, and GMM, as base media candidates for preincubation. As a result, BCT and mGAM exhibited significantly higher effective microbial richness compared to GMM (Fig. 2a). In addition, BCT and mGAM showed significantly higher Shannon effective number of species compared to initial fecal samples and GMM (Fig. 2a). In the BCT and mGAM groups, effective microbial richness maintained a constant level throughout the incubation period. In contrast, the Shannon effective index showed a tendency to increase rapidly until about ten days of incubation (Fig. 2b). At the phylum level, BCT and mGAM showed Bacillota and Bacteroidota relative abundances similar to initial fecal samples, while GMM resulted in significant Bacillota dominance (Fig. 2c). Pseudomonadota populations increased during cultivation in BCT and mGAM. A 30-day preincubation did not induce the expansion of Actinomycetota in any tested media. We divided the incubation period into three sections and analyzed population changes at the phylum level (Fig. 2d). From the early incubation stage (Sect. 1), Bacillota dominance was observed in GMM, while Pseudomonadota population increased in BCT and mGAM. Analysis of zOTU occurrence frequency and their relative abundances using the NCM revealed rapid convergence toward a neutral process in BCT and mGAM in Sect. 1, while GMM exhibited a pattern consistent with a niche-based process and did not achieve the same level of fitness as the NCM observed for BCT and mGAM (Fig. 2e). Upon analyzing the phylogenetic distance in microbial communities between media during preincubation, BCT and mGAM groups clustered similarly to the initial gut microbiota, whereas GMM formed a distinct cluster (Fig. 2f). In addition, microbial compositions in BCT and mGAM were changed from the initial samples as the incubation period increased, with mGAM showing more pronounced shift than BCT (Fig. 2g). Overall, GMM exhibited a selective influence on microbial populations during the 30-day human stool preincubation period, while BCT and mGAM showed a gradual change in microbial composition from the initial fecal microbiota, accompanied by an increase in microbial diversity. Furthermore, to determine whether the combined use of BCT and mGAM could be advantageous for obtaining microbial diversity, we compared bacterial composition detected in each medium for 30 days (Fig. 3). The proportion of common zOTUs was 40.8% in BCT and 37.5% in mGAM during the entire cultivation period (Fig. 3a, b). BCT showed higher coverage of initial fecal zOTUs than mGAM (97.1% vs. 92.8%). Notably, the proportion of unique zOTUs was highest in the early stage (5 and 10 days of cultivation) in both media (4.6% in BCT and 5.7% in mGAM). During a 30-day incubation period, 14.6% and 12.7% of unique zOTUs were detected in BCT and mGAM, respectively (Fig. 3c). These findings suggest that using both media in parallel allows for acquiring a wider variety of bacteria than using each medium alone.
A streamlined culturomics approach for investigating human gut microbiota
Using the streamlined culturomics approach, we obtained 11,107 isolates from stool samples of eight healthy individuals. Among these, 8141 isolates were identified, resulting in an average of 66 species per sample, comprising 27 aerotolerant and 39 non-aerotolerant species per sample (Fig. 4a). On average, 19 unique species were isolated from each donor, with an additional average of two potential novel species per sample. Notably, when frequency is defined as the number of donors from which each species was isolated, the number of species with a frequency of one was the highest at 153 (Fig. 4b), suggesting the advantages of more sample numbers for isolating bacterial diversity in this culturomics method. However, the number of identified isolates per individual, which varied from as few as 710 to as many as 1,629 (Fig. 4c), did not significantly correlate with cultured species diversity (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.36, P = 0.38). The identified species were classified into Actinomycetota, Bacillota, Bacteroidota, and Pseudomonadota, which are known as the major phyla in the human intestine, including Fusobacteriota. Among these, Bacillota were the most predominant species across all identified subjects (Fig. 4d). Among the 263 species in the culture collection, 119 aerotolerant species were identified, including 74 unique species and one novel species candidate (Fig. 4e). The 144 non-aerotolerant species included 69 unique species, along with 11 novel species candidates (Fig. 4f). Detailed information on potential novel species isolated in this study is provided in Table 1. Subject information (age and gender) and detailed isolation numbers in each sample were described in Supplementary Table S3. Cultured bacterial species from healthy individuals were listed in Supplementary Table S4.
Stool preincubation conditions using BCT and mGAM provided advantages, which are scattering isolation workload and obtaining a wider range of species compared to direct isolation from stool samples without preincubation (Fig. 5). Notable was the enhancement of isolated species diversity, especially under anaerobic conditions (Fig. 5a). When considering the overall efficiency of our cultivation conditions, cultivation for seven days under aerobic conditions and ten days under anaerobic conditions was the point at which we could obtain approximately 91% (91/100) and 95% (203/213) of the species identified in each condition, respectively (Fig. 5b). Notably, ten days of preincubation under anaerobic condition enabled to obtain twice the number of species (105 vs. 203) compared to the number of species obtained without preincubation. Moreover, more various species could be isolated at that point than when each medium was used alone (168 species in BCT, 163 species in mGAM). Nevertheless, some species were isolated after ten days of preincubation, and detailed isolation profiles of identified bacteria, based on preincubation medium and period, were presented in Supplementary Fig. S2 and S3. Moreover, a synergistic effect of species diversity expansion using BCT and mGAM was confirmed, enhancing species isolation by 36% and 50.7% under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively (Fig. 5c). The cumulative bacterial species diversity showed a significant positive correlation with the cumulative number of samples (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.98, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 5d).
In addition, we compared the culturomics data with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence-based analysis results. Although the effective microbial richness level estimated in a culture-independent method was consistent across subjects (Fig. 6a), the diversity of cultured species varied among individuals (Fig. 6b). Nonetheless, a comparison of the genera identified in two methods revealed that a substantial proportion of the genera were uniquely identified by each method (Fig. 6c).
Discussion
Culture-independent techniques have significantly expanded our understanding of the human gut microbiome. However, recent emphasis has highlighted the necessity of complementing genome-based findings with culture-dependent studies and experimental validation10,11,30,31,32. High-throughput microbial identification methods, such as MALDI-TOF MS, have notably improved efficiency in culture-based bacterial ecology research11. However, the culture-dependent approach remains labor-intensive, posing challenges for gut microbiome research15. Hence, efforts are needed to reduce workload and establish streamlined culture conditions tailored to gut-derived samples. Moreover, sharing such efforts among researchers could contribute to lowering the barrier to entry for researchers interested in culture-based studies. In this context, we simplified culture conditions and evaluated the practical outcomes in culturomics.
We applied stool preincubation as an effective strategy for isolating diverse microorganisms by distributing workload11. The main factors considered for the preincubation medium were as follows. First, the medium should be non-selective to support the growth of a wide range of gut bacteria. Second, utilizing existing commercial media was preferable to enhance convenience and reproducibility. Although BCT was initially designed for microbial cultivation in clinical blood samples, it has been used in previous culturomics studies due to its suitability for a broad range of microbial cultures15,21,33. In addition, mGAM is a commercial medium initially developed for cultivating anaerobic bacteria and has demonstrated high efficacy in recovering gut microbiota18,34,35. Despite being a noncommercial medium, we compared GMM to other media as it has been widely used in gut microbiome research18,36,37,38. Consequently, GMM induced a high dominance of Bacillota, while BCT and mGAM maintained microbial diversity during a 30-day incubation period (Fig. 2). Additionally, the combined use of BCT and mGAM demonstrated a synergistic effect, particularly effective in isolating various species under anaerobic conditions (Figs. 3, Fig. 5b,c). These findings demonstrate the potential of BCT and mGAM in culturomics, focusing on gut-derived samples from healthy individuals where anaerobic bacteria predominate39.
In this study, we immobilized gut microbiota within gel beads consisting of gellan and xanthan gums20. This method was developed to sustain bacterial diversity in long-term cultures in bioreactors. The main advantage of immobilization was preserving slow-growing or temperature-sensitive bacteria (e.g., Bifidobacterium spp.), which have limited ability to compete for nutrients. By incorporating this procedure into culturomics, we aimed to maintain bacterial diversity during preincubation. For instance, we observed the recovery of some Bifidobacterium species even after seven days of preincubation (Supplementary Fig. S3). This result could be enhanced by evaluating the effects of immobilization under our conditions in the future.
Moreover, we found that preincubation up to ten days efficiently facilitated bacterial isolation (Fig. 5b). During the early stages of preincubation, we were able to isolate most novel species candidates and low-abundance gut bacteria (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3)40. Commercial or clinical species of interest, such as next-generation probiotics, were also isolated within ten days of cultivation (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). However, the task of colony picking is arbitrary, and there is no standardized method to determine the colonies for picking the specific or various species. Therefore, researchers must rely on their experience, such as visible morphological differences, which is one of the significant limitations of the culture-dependent approach. Our results demonstrated that isolating more colonies does not necessarily result in obtaining more diverse species in individual samples (Fig. 4c). Consistent with previous studies16, we found a significant positive correlation between the number of samples and overall microbial species diversity (Fig. 5d). Therefore, while applying multiple cultivation conditions may be appropriate if the goal is to isolate a large number of microbial species from a single sample, increasing the number of samples is a more favorable strategy for capturing overall microbial species diversity, as demonstrated in our study with minimal conditions. Additionally, sample-specific characteristics can play a significant role in determining culture conditions for human gut-derived samples. There is variation in results due to individual differences in gut microbiota (Supplementary Fig. S4), which directly affects the outcomes of the culturomics approach.
Culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches can provide complementary perspectives on the human gut microbiota. This study compared culturomics results and 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis results. The 16S rRNA genomic analysis provides information on species diversity based on sequence-based zOTUs, while culturomics reveals the diversity of cultivable bacterial species under the given culture conditions (Fig. 6a,b). Interestingly, a substantial proportion of genera were found only by either approach (Fig. 6c). This highlights each approach’s unique strengths and limitations. The culture-dependent approach offers information that the culture-independent approach cannot provide, such as not-yet-cultured species, bacterial viability, and low-abundance bacteria12. However, the culture-dependent approach is limited to providing information only on culturable bacteria under the applied culture conditions. Bacteria that require specific cultivation conditions or cannot be recovered under cultivation conditions may be missed. Therefore, both approaches are complementary to each other, and their strengths can be leveraged to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the gut microbiome.
One limitation of this study is that we could not quantify the total viable microbial population of the eight stool samples. While our culturomics results were compared with the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data (Fig. 6c), DNA-based analysis does not guarantee the viability of microorganisms. This led to a significant challenge in quantifying the isolation efficiency of diverse gut bacteria from the proposed simplified cultivation conditions. Using flow cytometry to distinguish live and dead cells could be an alternative approach to address this limitation41.
We introduced a streamlined culturomics approach with preincubation to investigate the human gut microbiome. This model distributed workload and reduced overall culturing labor by applying preincubation and a minimal base media, resulting in a diverse collection of 263 species from a large number of bacterial isolates. To further broaden species diversity, culture conditions can be modified by adding growth factors, incorporating antibiotics with different spectrums, or applying physical interventions. However, a high number of factors and parameters can be involved in culture conditions, and increasing the number of variables directly decreases work efficiency. Sharing culturomics research and cases with details is essential to overcoming this problem. Streamlining and optimizing culturomics protocols, developing automated cultivation technologies, and integrating machine learning can further broaden culturomics accessibility to a broader range of researchers16,17,42. Employing these strategies alongside culture-independent methods can yield novel insights into the human gut microbiome and propel microbiome research advancements.
Data availability
The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences of preincubated stool samples were deposited in the GenBank SRA database (PRJNA1094612). The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences of stool samples from healthy individuals in a culturomics study were deposited in GenBank SRA database (PRJNA975692). The 16S rRNA gene of potential novel species were deposited in GenBank (OP753574, OP753719, OP753729, OP753730, OP753734–OP753736, OP753744, OP753822, OP762691, OP763639, and OP811536). Draft genome sequences of potential novel species were deposited in the SRA database (SRR28033821–SRR28033827, SRR28033829, SRR28033830, SRR28033832, SRR28033834, SRR28033835) under the BioProject no. PRJNA975692 and BioSample no. SAMN39987472, SAMN39987473, SAMN39987475–SAMN39987481, SAMN39987483, SAMN39987485, and SAMN39987486.
References
Lewis, W. H., Tahon, G., Geesink, P., Sousa, D. Z. & Ettema, T. J. G. Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nat Rev Microbiol. 19, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00458-8 (2021).
Oulas, A. et al. Metagenomics: tools and insights for analyzing next-generation sequencing data derived from biodiversity studies. Bioinform Biol Insights. 9, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S12462 (2015).
Wang, W. L. et al. Application of metagenomics in the human gut microbiome. World J. Gastroenterol. 21, 803–814. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.803 (2015).
Almeida, A. et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 568, 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0965-1 (2019).
Almeida, A. et al. A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0603-3 (2021).
Yen, S. & Johnson, J. S. Metagenomics: a path to understanding the gut microbiome. Mamm. Genome. 32, 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-021-09889-x (2021).
Nayfach, S., Shi, Z. J., Seshadri, R., Pollard, K. S. & Kyrpides, N. C. New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome. Nature. 568, 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1058-x (2019).
Peterson, D. et al. Comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene and metagenome sequencing in pediatric gut microbiomes. Front. Microbiol. 12, 670336. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.670336 (2021).
Jovel, J. et al. Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Front. Microbiol. 7, 459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459 (2016).
Vrancken, G., Gregory, A. C., Huys, G. R. B., Faust, K. & Raes, J. Synthetic ecology of the human gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 754–763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0264-8 (2019).
Lagier, J. C. et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18, 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12023 (2012).
Lagier, J. C. et al. Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0041-0 (2018).
Diakite, A. et al. Extensive culturomics of 8 healthy samples enhances metagenomics efficiency. PLoS One. 14, e0223543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223543 (2019).
Tidjani Alou, M. et al. Gut bacteria missing in severe acute malnutrition, can we identify potential probiotics by culturomics?. Front Microbiol. 8, 899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00899 (2017).
Naud, S. et al. Proof of concept of culturomics use of time of care. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 524769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.524769 (2020).
Pereira, A. C. & Cunha, M. V. An effective culturomics approach to study the gut microbiota of mammals. Res. Microbiol. 171, 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2020.09.001 (2020).
Chang, Y. et al. Optimization of culturomics strategy in human fecal samples. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02891 (2019).
Ito, T., Sekizuka, T., Kishi, N., Yamashita, A. & Kuroda, M. Conventional culture methods with commercially available media unveil the presence of novel culturable bacteria. Gut Microbes. 10, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1491265 (2019).
Wu, W. K. et al. Optimization of fecal sample processing for microbiome study - The journey from bathroom to bench. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 118, 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2018.02.005 (2019).
Cinquin, C., Le Blay, G., Fliss, I. & Lacroix, C. Immobilization of infant fecal microbiota and utilization in an in vitro colonic fermentation model. Microb. Ecol. 48, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-2022-7 (2004).
Lagier, J. C. et al. The rebirth of culture in microbiology through the example of culturomics to study human gut microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00014-14 (2015).
Amplicon, P., Clean-Up, P. & Index, P. 16S Metagenomic sequencing library preparation (Illumina, San Diego, 2013).
Lagkouvardos, I. et al. IMNGS: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci. Rep. 6, 33721. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33721 (2016).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 41, D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 (2013).
Lagkouvardos, I., Fischer, S., Kumar, N. & Clavel, T. Rhea: a transparent and modular R pipeline for microbial profiling based on 16S rRNA gene amplicons. PeerJ. 5, e2836. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2836 (2017).
Reitmeier, S. et al. Handling of spurious sequences affects the outcome of high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiling. ISME Commun. 1, 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00033-z (2021).
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 8, e61217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 (2013).
Sloan, W. T. et al. Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structure. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00956.x (2006).
Oliveros, J. C. Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams. https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (2007–2015).
Tidjani Alou, M. et al. State of the art in the culture of the human microbiota: New interests and strategies. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 34, e00129-e219. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00129-19 (2020).
Hitch, T. C. A. et al. Recent advances in culture-based gut microbiome research. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 311, 151485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2021.151485 (2021).
Clavel, T., Horz, H. P., Segata, N. & Vehreschild, M. Next steps after 15 stimulating years of human gut microbiome research. Microb. Biotechnol. 15, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13970 (2022).
Lagier, J. C. et al. Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16203. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.203 (2016).
Rettedal, E. A., Gumpert, H. & Sommer, M. O. Cultivation-based multiplex phenotyping of human gut microbiota allows targeted recovery of previously uncultured bacteria. Nat. Commun. 5, 4714. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5714 (2014).
Gotoh, A. et al. Use of Gifu Anaerobic Medium for culturing 32 dominant species of human gut microbes and its evaluation based on short-chain fatty acids fermentation profiles. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 81, 2009–2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2017.1359486 (2017).
Goodman, A. L. et al. Extensive personal human gut microbiota culture collections characterized and manipulated in gnotobiotic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 6252–6257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102938108 (2011).
Biagini, F. et al. Designs and methodologies to recreate in vitro human gut microbiota models. Bio-Des. Manuf. 6, 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00210-6 (2023).
Średnicka, P. et al. Effect of in vitro cultivation on human gut microbiota composition using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and metabolomics approach. Sci. Rep. 13, 3026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29637-2 (2023).
Vacca, I. Microbiome: The microbiota maintains oxygen balance in the gut. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 574–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.112 (2017).
de Cena, J. A., Zhang, J., Deng, D., Damé-Teixeira, N. & Do, T. Low-abundant microorganisms: The human microbiome’s dark matter, a scoping review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 689197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.689197 (2021).
Bellali, S. et al. Running after ghosts: are dead bacteria the dark matter of the human gut microbiota?. Gut Microbes 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1897208 (2021).
Huang, Y. et al. High-throughput microbial culturomics using automation and machine learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1424–1433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01674-2 (2023).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2021R1A6A3A13038425 and 2021R1I1A1A01057496). We also thank Doctor Tae Kyu Lee and Yu Min Han for their support in recruiting volunteers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HP and SY conceived and designed the study. SY and CBR managed the approval process related to the IRB and collected the stool samples. HP and SY performed the culturomics experiments, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence-based analysis, and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. HP, SY, and CSH reviewed and finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, H., Yeo, S., Ryu, C.B. et al. A streamlined culturomics case study for the human gut microbiota research. Sci Rep 14, 20361 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71370-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71370-x
- Springer Nature Limited