Abstract
Searching for topological superconductors that host topological charge-neutral Majorana zero-modes at edges has become a central problem in condensed matter research due to their potential applications for quantum computations. Meanwhile, electron correlations in solid-state materials enhance quantum fluctuations and give rise to various quantum many-body phases. Whether these electron correlations alone would lead to topological superconductivity is a fundamentally important open problem. Here, we theoretically find the correlation-driven topological superconductivity in a class of Kondo lattice materials. Therein, the odd-parity Kondo hybridization mediates ferromagnetic spin-spin coupling and leads to spin-triplet pairing between local moments. Triplet \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\)-wave topological superconductivity with Majorana zero modes at edges is reached when Kondo hybridization co-exists with the triplet pairings. Our results offer a detailed understanding of the experimental observations on UTe2, a ferromagnetic heavy-electron triplet superconductor. Our approach to topological superconductivity shows advantages over the heterostructure approach by proximity effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Searching for topological superconductors has become one of the central problems in condensed matter physics due to the emergence of the long-sought fundamentally important self-dual charge-neutral quasi-particles, so-called Majorana zero-modes (MZM) as their excitations at edges, and their potential applications for quantum computations1,2. To date, theoretical proposals and experimental realizations of topological superconductors are focused on heterostructures, combining strong spin-orbit coupled materials and conventional superconductors by proximity effect3,4,5, where the topological edge states can be explained in terms of the single-particle band structure without considering many-body electron correlations. On the other hand, electron correlations in solid-state materials are known to give rise to various quantum many-body phases. Whether these electron correlations alone would lead to topological superconductivity without introducing the proximity effect is a fundamentally important open problem. The Kondo effect, which describes the screening of a local spin moment by conduction electrons, is a well-known example of strong electron correlation existing in heavy-electron compounds. The Kondo-mediated topological phases of matter have been studied in the context of topological Kondo insulators6,7,8 and topological Kondo semi-metals9,10, where the topological properties are driven either by the odd-parity Kondo hybridization or by the Kondo hybridization cooperating with strong spin-orbit coupling and crystalline symmetry.
Meanwhile, spin-triplet superconductors are known to be the prime candidates for topological superconductors. However, they are scarce in nature. While the existence of spin-triplet superconductivity in SrRu2O411,12,13 is still debatable, more convincing evidence has been observed in noncentrosymmetric superconductor BiPd by phase-sensitive measurement14. More recently, signatures of triplet chiral superconductivity were observed in heavy-electron compound UTe2 at the edge of ferromagnetism, possibly marking the first example of a topological superconductor induced by the Kondo effect15,16,17,18,19.
Motivated by these discoveries, in this paper, we theoretically find a distinct class of topological superconductivity driven purely by strong electron correlations without invoking proximity effect on heterostructures20 in a distinct class of Kondo lattice materials with odd-parity Kondo hybridization. Beginning with the Anderson lattice model with odd-parity hybridization6,7,8, we explicitly derive an effective low-energy Kondo term via the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation21,22. Furthermore, we analytically obtain a short-distance ferromagnetic RKKY interaction among the local f-electrons mediated by this Kondo effect. This RKKY interaction results in the attraction of f-electrons and leads to the formation of pairings. We explore the mean-field phase diagram of this ferromagnetic Kondo-Heisenberg model. A time-reversal invariant topological superconducting phase is reached when the Kondo effect co-exists with the spin-triplet p-wave (Sz = ± 1) resonating valence bond (RVB) order parameter, see Fig. 1 below. Triplet superconducting pairing arising from Kondo correlation and triplet RVB has been proposed in the two-channel Hund’s-Kondo model in ref. 23. However, this superconducting state via a simplified demonstration is topologically trivial; and it is not clear whether this approach would lead to robust topological superconductivity without substantially engineering the system. Here, we employ an alternative approach to realize a generic and robust Kondo-mediated topological superconductivity in a distinct class of Kondo-Heisenberg lattice model with an odd-parity Kondo hybridization. We rigorously demonstrate the topologically non-trivial properties in the superconducting phase by computing the Z2 topological Chern number of the bulk band and the helical MZM emerging at the edges of a finite-sized ribbon. Since the topological states are pinned to the Fermi energy of the conduction band by the Kondo effect, they are easy to observe and do not require fine-tuning in experiments. Therefore, our approach offers a more feasible guiding principle to realize MZM and shows advantages10,24 over the conventional heterostructure approach by proximity effect where experimental fine-tuning is often necessary (see Results). Our results offer a detailed understanding of the spin-triplet superconductivity recently observed in UTe2, a promising candidate for topological Kondo superconductor (TKSc).
Results
From the odd-parity Anderson lattice model to the ferromagnetic Kondo-Heisenberg lattice model
Our perspective toward the problem of the topological superconductor with Kondo coherence is based on Doniach’s scenario for heavy-electron compounds25—competition between the Kondo correlation and magnetism leads to phase transitions, whereas superconductivity can form when they collaborate. To capture the non-trivial topology in the superconducting state, we consider the odd-parity Kondo hybridization between conduction electrons and local f-electrons. A topological superconducting state emerges with the help of this type of Kondo hybridization.
To this end, it is natural to start with the odd-parity Anderson lattice model on a two-dimensional (2D) square lattice6,7,8:
where the odd-parity Kondo hybridization was shown to give rise to topological insulators6,7,8. This model involves the itinerant c and localized f electrons, corresponding to the physical electrons occupying the d and f orbital states. The dynamics of the c-electrons are described within the framework of a tightly binding model (Hc), showing the dispersion \({\varepsilon }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}=-2t(\cos {k}_{x}+\cos {k}_{y})-\mu\) with the hopping strength t and the chemical potential (Fermi energy) μ. We set t = 1 to be the energy unit in the following. The Hf term describes the f electrons with momentum-independent flat energy band εf < 0 relative to μ and a repulsive on-site Coulomb potential (the Hubbard-U term). The Hcf term,
describes the hybridization of impurity and its neighboring conduction electrons with opposite spins, distinct from the conventional (onsite) and spin-conserving hybridization6,7,8. The hybridization matrix is defined as \({V}_{ij}^{\sigma {\sigma }^{{\prime} }}\equiv {V}_{\hat{\alpha }}^{\sigma {\sigma }^{{\prime} }}=iV{\nu }_{\hat{\alpha }}{\sigma }_{\alpha }^{\sigma {\sigma }^{{\prime} }}\) with V being the hybridization strength. Here, \({\nu }_{\hat{\alpha }}\) satisfies \({\nu }_{\hat{\alpha }}={\nu }_{-\hat{\alpha }}\) with \(\hat{\alpha }\equiv i-j\in \,\hat{x},\hat{y}\,(\alpha \in x,y)\) on a 2D square lattice and σα denotes the Pauli matrix of the α component. Due to the opposite parity of the f and c electrons as well as the odd parity of \({\nu }_{\hat{\alpha }}\), the parity symmetry of Hcf is preserved. The odd-parity hybridization between the f- and c-electrons in Eq. (2) implies an effective spin-orbit coupling. Candidate materials with odd-parity Kondo hybridization include SmB626, SmS27, YbB1228.
The Kondo-Heisenberg model is the commonly-accepted minimum model for Doniach’s scenario25 and the heavy-fermion superconductivity. Below, we apply the same method for which the conventional Kondo-Heisenberg lattice model is obtained to derive the corresponding one for the odd-parity Anderson lattice model29,30: The effective Kondo term, denoted as HK, can be derived by projecting out the valence fluctuations, the so-called Schrieffer-Wolff transformation21,22,31; and the magnetic RKKY-like interaction, denoted as HJ, among the local f electrons is generated by perturbatively expanding the above Kondo term to the second order31,32,33. The explicit forms of the HK and HJ terms are provided in Eqs. (8) and (9) in the Methods section, with details of their derivations given in Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, respectively. In addition, the resulting HJ term can be expressed as a linear combination of spinon pairs with total spin S = 0 (spin-singlet) and S = 1 (spin-triplet), associated with opposite signs in the coupling [see Eq. (9) in Methods], reminiscent of the conventional spin-1/2 Heisenberg interaction. The RKKY-like coupling J(R) of the local f fermions exhibits an oscillatory behavior as a function of the distance \(R\equiv \left\vert {{{{\boldsymbol{R}}}}}_{ij}\right\vert\) between two f fermions, accompanied by a decrease in its magnitude with increasing R:
where JK denotes the Kondo coupling (see Supplementary Note 1). Due to the rapid attenuation of J(R), we only consider the dominated nearest-neighbor interaction and assume J(R) to be a spatially homogeneous constant, i.e., J(R = a) ≡ JH. The dominating RKKY coupling JH < 0 is attractive (or of the ferromagnetic type, see Fig. 2), which energetically favors spin-triplet pairing. On the other hand, the effective RKKY coupling in the spin-singlet channel is repulsive and thus energetically disfavored. Finally, on a two-dimensional lattice, the triplet spin state of Sz = 0 (\(\left\vert \uparrow \downarrow \right\rangle +\left\vert \downarrow \uparrow \right\rangle\)) with a p-wave form factor proportional to kz does not exist here. Note that it is the odd-parity Kondo hybridization (or effective spin-orbit coupling) that stabilizes the ferromagnetic RKKY. When the odd-parity Kondo hybridization term is replaced by the conventional constant Kondo hybridization, the conventional RKKY coupling is recovered, which favors anti-ferromagnetic coupling between neighboring spins near half-filling.
With the inclusions of HK and HJ, the effective Kondo-Heisenberg lattice model reads HFKH = Hc + HK + HJ, subjected to the single-occupancy constraint of the f fermions on each site, \({n}_{i}^{\, f}={\sum }_{\sigma }{f}_{i\sigma }^{{{\dagger}} }{f}_{i\sigma }=1\). The Hamiltonian HFKH offers a platform for discovering a distinct class of topological superconducting states induced by electron correlations via collaboration between the ferromagnetic RKKY coupling and the Kondo effect. To facilitate our numerical calculations of the mean-field phase diagram below, we treat JK and JH as independent couplings here since it is more convenient to explore the phase diagram by tuning the ratio of JK/JH30,34. In experiments, by varying the non-thermal parameter (e.g., pressure, magnetic field, or chemical doping), one anticipates the system to follow a specific trajectory of JK/JH in the phase diagram.
Mean-field treatment
We now employ a mean-field analysis on the Kondo-Heisenberg Hamiltonian HFKM. Performing the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation, HK and HJ can be factorized as
where the mean-field values of the bosonic Hubbard-Stratonovich fields, χi and \({\Delta }_{t}^{\sigma = \uparrow /\downarrow }(i,j)\), represent the mean-field order parameters of the Kondo correlation and the Sz = ± 1 t-RVB bonds, respectively.
To describe the Kondo-screened Fermi-liquid state, we allow χi field to acquire uniform Bose-condensation; hence, χi can be expressed as \({\chi }_{i}\to x+{\hat{\chi }}_{i}\) with \(x=(-{J}_{K}/{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}){\sum }_{i\sigma {\sigma }^{{\prime} }\alpha }\langle i{\nu }_{\hat{\alpha }}{\sigma }_{\alpha }^{\sigma {\sigma }^{{\prime} }}{f}_{i\sigma }^{{{\dagger}} }{c}_{i-\hat{\alpha },{\sigma }^{{\prime} }}\rangle\) being the Bose-condensed stiffness of χi while \({\hat{\chi }}_{i}\) represents its fluctuations. The mean-field order parameter of the t-RVB is given by \({\Delta }_{t}^{\sigma }=(-| {J}_{H}| /4{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}){\sum }_{\langle i,j\rangle }\langle {f}_{j\sigma }{f}_{i\sigma }\rangle\). It has been known that the ferromagnetic spin-spin interaction (or ferromagnetism) is expected to favor spin-triplet pairing in unconventional superconductors35 as well as in superfluid helium-336. Meanwhile, the odd-parity hybridization term Hcf in Eq. (2) leads to the momentum-dependent form factor \(\sin {k}_{x}\pm i\sin {k}_{y}\) (see Eq. (5) below), reminiscent of the Rashba spin-orbit coupling which favors \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\)-wave spin-triplet pairing37,38. While the form factor of the Kondo hybridization is odd under inversion transformation, the whole Kondo hybridization term in our model Hamiltonian maintains parity symmetry. Based on the above reasoning, in the following, we focus exclusively on the \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\)-wave spin-triplet pairing between the f electrons in our Kondo lattice model with odd-parity Kondo hybridization and ferromagnetic RKKY coupling, see Eqs. (13) and (14) below. The single-occupancy constraint of the local fermions can be equivalently enforced by adding \(-{\sum }_{i}i{\lambda }_{i}\left[{\sum }_{\sigma }\left({f}_{i\sigma }^{{{\dagger}} }{f}_{i\sigma }\right)-1\right]\) in HFKM. λi here is the Lagrange multiplier. In the mean-field approximation, we take iλi → λ at the mean-field level and neglect the fluctuations of λi, χi, and \({\Delta }_{t}^{\sigma }\), leading to the following mean-field Kondo-Heisenberg-like Hamiltonian of HFKM:
where \({{{\mathscr{C}}}}=\frac{8{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}{\Delta }_{t}^{2}}{| {J}_{H}| }+\frac{{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}{x}^{2}}{{J}_{K}}-{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}\lambda\) is a constant, \({V}_{1{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}=2x\left(\sin {k}_{x}-i\sin {k}_{y}\right)\) and \({V}_{2{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}=2x\left(\sin {k}_{x}+i\sin {k}_{y}\right)\). The Fourier transformation of a second-quantization operator is defined as \({\psi }_{i\sigma }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}}}{\sum }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}{e}^{-i{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\cdot {{{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}}_{i}}{\psi }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\sigma }\). Note that the mean-field Kondo term of Eq. (5) is reminiscent of the topological Kondo insulator shown in ref. 39. In Eq. (5), \({\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\sigma }\) are defined as \({\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow }={\Delta }_{t}\left(-\sin {k}_{y}-i\sin {k}_{x}\right)\) and \(\quad {\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\downarrow }={\Delta }_{t}\left(\sin {k}_{y}-i\sin {k}_{x}\right)\) with Δt being the mean-field pairing potential of the t-RVB. Note that the momentum-dependent form factor of \({\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\sigma }\) is proportional to that of the odd-parity Kondo hybridization, \({\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow }\propto {V}_{2{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}},{\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\downarrow }\propto {V}_{1{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}\), similar to the case of the p-wave triplet pairing favored by the Rashba spin-orbit coupling37,38.
Our mean-field Kondo-Heisenberg Hamiltonian of Eq. (5) possesses time-reversal symmetry (TRS), whereas, due to the \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\) RVB pairing, the parity symmetry is broken here. Owing to TRS, our model can be expressed as a summation of two decoupled matrices as follows \({H}_{MF}={\sum }_{I = A,B}{H}_{I}+{{{\mathscr{C}}}}={\sum }_{I,{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}{\phi }_{I}^{{{\dagger}} }({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}){{{{\mathscr{H}}}}}_{I}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}){\phi }_{I}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})+{{{\mathscr{C}}}}\) with \({\phi }_{A}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})={\left({c}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow },{c}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow }^{{{\dagger}} },{f}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow },{f}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow }^{{{\dagger}} }\right)}^{T}\) and \({\phi }_{B}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})={\left({c}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow },{c}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow }^{{{\dagger}} },{f}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow },{f}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow }^{{{\dagger}} }\right)}^{T}\) being the Nambu spinors for HA(B). One can show that HA and HB constitute the time-reversal partners. In this representation, the charge-conjugation (particle-hole) symmetry of our model can be readily seen. Our model Eq. (5) thus belongs to the DIII class of the ten-fold classification40.
Mean-field phase diagram
The mean-field ground states are determined by minimizing the mean-field free energy per site \({{{{\mathscr{F}}}}}_{MF}=\frac{{{{\mathscr{C}}}}}{{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}}-\frac{{k}_{B}T}{{{{{\mathscr{N}}}}}_{s}}{\sum }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}},n}\ln \left[1+\exp \left(-\frac{{E}_{n{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}}{{k}_{B}T}\right)\right]\) with respect to the mean-field variables q ∈ (λ, x, Δt), i.e., \(\partial {{{{\mathscr{F}}}}}_{MF}/\partial q=0\) (the explicit form for the dispersion is provided in Eq. (12) of Methods). Here, Enk < 0 is the n-th filled band of HMF. The chemical potential μ is determined by the relation \(\partial {{{{\mathscr{F}}}}}_{MF}/\partial \mu =-(1+\delta )\), with δ being the chemical doping of the c-electrons for which δ ⋛ 0 is for p/un/n− doped. By solving the above saddle-point equations self-consistently for both the bulk and the ribbon with Ny = 44 chains, we obtain the ground-state phase diagrams of the model as shown in Fig. 3. Figure 3 contains three distinct mean-field phases: a pure Kondo phase is found at JH/JK = 0 where x ≠ 0, Δt = 0. At the opposite limit where the RKKY interaction dominates, the ground-state shows short-range magnetic correlation with p-wave t-RVB pairing (Δt ≠ 0, x = 0). In the intermediate range of \(0 < {J}_{H}/{J}_{K} < {({J}_{H}/{J}_{K})}_{c}\), we find a Kondo-t-RVB co-existing (superconducting) phase with x ≠ 0 and Δt ≠ 0, which can be explained via the mechanism of Kondo-stabilized spin liquid30,41: The t-RVB state gains kinetic energy by coupling to the Kondo hybridization, leading to the stabilized co-existing superconducting state. The bulk band structure in the co-existing superconducting state, shown in Fig. 4, is fully-gapped. This superconducting gap is contributed by both the Kondo and t-RVB order parameters.
The development of superconductivity in this co-existing phase can be understood in terms of higher-order processes involving both the Kondo and t-RVB terms as follows. When the Kondo hybridization field χ gets Bose-condensed (x ≠ 0), the local fermions delocalize into the conduction band and make the t-RVB pairs superconducting42. These processes can be described by the effective mean-field Hamiltonian \({H}_{sc}={\sum }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}\left({\bar{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\downarrow * }{c}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow }{c}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow }+{\bar{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow * }{c}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow }{c}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow }+H.c.\right)\), where the effective gap functions take the form \({\bar{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\downarrow * }={V}_{1{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}{V}_{1,-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}{\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow * } \sim {x}^{2}{\Delta }_{t}({\sin }^{2}{k}_{x}+{\sin }^{2}{k}_{y})(\sin {k}_{x}-i\sin {k}_{y})\) and \({\bar{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow * }={V}_{2{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}{V}_{2,-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}{\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\downarrow * } \sim {x}^{2}{\Delta }_{t}({\sin }^{2}{k}_{x}+{\sin }^{2}{k}_{y})(\sin {k}_{x}+i\sin {k}_{y})\) with the size of the superconducting gap being proportional to x2Δt. The superconducting transition temperature Tc as a function of JH/JK shows a dome shape (Fig. 3). The superconducting gap function \({\overline{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow }\) we obtained here shows an f-wave-like pairing symmetry on a generic anisotropic 2D Fermi surface. Nevertheless, as we take the continuous limit of the conduction band here, \({\overline{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow }\) can be expressed as a product of s and \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\) pairing orders, i.e., \({\bar{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\uparrow /\downarrow * } \sim {k}^{2}({k}_{x}\pm i{k}_{y})\) with \({k}^{2}\equiv {k}_{x}^{2}+{k}_{y}^{2}\) on a circular Fermi surface, only the \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\) component plays a role here. The effective \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\) pairing (\({\overline{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\sigma }\)) between the conduction electrons in Hsc gives rise to a fully superconducting gap on a 2D lattice. However, when considering a 3D conduction band, this effective pairing shows a point-node gap structure in the quasiparticle dispersion, see Applications for UTe2 below and Supplementary Note 3. Note that we find the co-existing superconducting state persists for an arbitrarily small value of JH/JK → 0+. This behavior is likely due to overestimating the co-existing phase at the mean-field level. We expect a narrower co-existing superconducting phase after including fluctuations of the Kondo and t-RVB order parameters beyond the mean-field level. We also notice that our mean-field solutions in Fig. 3 show a kink-like feature near JH/JK ≈ 6.5, possibly due to the specific mathematical form of the saddle-point equations. Nevertheless, they are continuous as JK and JH are varied, and no phase transition is found across the kink. A first-order transition is observed at the transition of the t-RVB and co-existing superconducting phases (see Fig. 3), similar to the results found in refs. 30,43.
Topological properties of the co-existing phase
We now address the topological properties of the co-existing superconducting state. Given that our model preserves TRS, the bulk topological properties of the co-existing Kondo-t-RVB superconducting state can be characterized by the topological Z2 index cT (or time-reversal polarization)44,45,46, given by
with cI (I ∈ A, B) being the Thouless-Kohmoto-Nightingal-den Nijs number47 of HI. The Berry’s connection \({{{{\boldsymbol{{{{\mathscr{A}}}}}}}}}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{I}\) is given by \({{{{\boldsymbol{{{{\mathscr{A}}}}}}}}}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{I}\equiv i{\sum }_{n\in I}\langle {u}_{n{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{I}| {{{{\boldsymbol{\nabla }}}}}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}| {u}_{n{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{I}\rangle\) with \(\left\vert {u}_{n{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{I}\right\rangle\) being the normalized Bloch state of the n-th filled band of HI(k). We numerically find that cA = − cB = 1 in the co-existing phase48, indicating a topologically non-trivial Z2 index cT = 1. By the bulk-edge correspondence, we expect this co-existing superconducting state to support a pair of counter-propagating MZM at the edges of a finite-sized ribbon. Further band structure calculations of our model on a ribbon in the following section confirm our expectations.
We now check whether our model would support helical Majorana edge states by examining the electronic band structures and edge-state wave functions of the co-existing state on a finite-sized strip near the Fermi level (details are provided in Supplementary Note 4). As shown in Figs. 5 and 6, the low-energy Bogoliubov quasiparticle excitations of both HA and HB exhibit linear-dispersed Dirac spectra around kx = 0 accompanied by an exponential decay in the wave functions, typical features of topological edge states. The excitations can be effectively described by the linear-dispersed Hamiltonian \({\tilde{H}}_{I}={\sum }_{{k}_{x}}{v}_{x}| {k}_{x}| \left({\gamma }_{I,{k}_{x}}^{R\,{{\dagger}} }{\gamma }_{I,{k}_{x}}^{R}-{\gamma }_{I,{k}_{x}}^{L\,{{\dagger}} }{\gamma }_{I,{k}_{x}}^{L}\right)\) with
with \(u,\bar{u}\) and \(v,\bar{v}\) being the coherent factors and vx ~ ∂E(kx)/∂kx being the velocity indicating the direction of propagation. In Eq. (7), Γ ∈ R, L and \({\gamma }_{I,{k}_{x}}^{R/L}\) represents the right/left-moving Bogoliubov quasiparticle of \({\tilde{H}}_{I}\). We find that the four edge states, shown in Fig. 6c, d, e, f, constitute two pairs of counter-propagating edge states located at opposite edges, revealing the nature of helical MZM (see Fig. 6g). The helical type of the MZM is the consequence of the TRS of our model. In addition to the Majorana fermions at zero energy, two pairs of counter-propagating edge states are observed at finite-energy, see Fig. 7. The two pairs of edge states correspond to the edge states of the topological Kondo insulator, where the t-RVB order parameter is absent (Δt = 0)6,7,8. Qualitative explanations for the emergence of the three pairs of edge states shown in Fig. 5 are provided in the next subsection and Fig. 8a.
Physical insight to the search for topological superconductivity
The mechanism we propose here via co-existing Kondo hybridization and t-RVB offers a physical insight into the search for topological superconductivity. It shows advantages over the intensively studied heterostructure approach via the proximity effect for which the correlation effect plays a minor role. Nonetheless, we acknowledge the alternative approaches to correlation-driven topological superconductivity, including other possible proximity-induced approaches in heterostructures. As shown in Fig. 8a, for Tc < T < Tonset, with Tonset being the onset temperature of Kondo hybridization, the local f-electron band at an effective chemical potential λ first Kondo-hybridizes with the conduction band close to the Fermi energy μ. The non-trivial topological features of our model system are pinned near the Fermi energy of the conduction band when the Kondo effect emerges10 since these topological features are in-printed in the odd-parity Kondo hybridization. With further decreasing temperature below Tc, the formation of the p-wave t-RVB pairings opens up energy gaps between the particle and hole branches of the hybridized bands below, at, and above μ, as shown in Fig. 8b. The energy gap at μ corresponds to the superconducting gap, leading to the emergence of the topological superconducting state. Hence, the topologically non-trivial gapless MZM inside the superconducting gap is also pinned at μ. The pinning of MZM10,24 by the Kondo hybridization in our system makes the topological superconductivity more feasible to form and to be observed compared to the heterostructure approach where the topological edge states may be far from the Fermi level of the s-wave superconductor (see Fig. 8b), and fine-tuning the chemical potential of either of the two sub-systems is required.
Applications for UTe2
We will now discuss the application of our findings to a promising candidate for TKSc: ferromagnetic heavy-electron superconductor UTe2. At ambient pressure, UTe2 does not show long-ranged ferromagnetism, unlike its related uranium compounds UGe2, URhGe, and UCoGe where superconductivity co-exists with long-range ferromagnetism. Nevertheless, UTe2, located at the end of the above ferromagnetic superconducting Kondo lattice compounds, lives near the edge of ferromagnetism, suggesting short-range ferromagnetic fluctuations are still expected to play a role there. A characteristic feature of these ferromagnetic superconductors is that they exhibit very large upper critical fields (Hc2), far exceeding the ordinary Pauli paramagnetic limit (Hp/Tsc = 1.86 T/K). Similar to UGe2, URhGe, and UCoGe, the family of ferromagnetic superconductors, UTe2 also shows very large Hc215,49. This strongly indicates the enhancement of ferromagnetic fluctuations there, similar to the other above-mentioned ferromagnetic superconductors. We will show that our results qualitatively agree with and, to some extent, quantitatively explain the experimental observations in UTe2, despite our simplified two-dimensional square lattice system. Theoretical studies indicated competition or co-existence between ferromagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic fluctuations in UTe2 when Hubbard U or Kondo hybridization is varied19,50,51, possibly due to strong magnetic frustrations there. Indeed, both ferromagnetic52,53 and anti-ferromagnetic54 correlations in this compound were reported. In particular, it was predicted in ref. 50 that the dominantly ferromagnetic correlations at ambient pressure change to anti-ferromagnetic correlations with increasing pressure, consistent with various experimental observations49,52,53. Though magnetic correlations in UTe2 are still an open issue, the ferromagnetic Kondo lattice model we propose here is consistent with theoretical expectations and various experimental observations mentioned above. The DFT+U calculations indicate that the dynamics of electron bands and the physical properties of UTe2 are dominated by the electrons near the quasi-two-dimensional (cylindrical) Fermi surface with a weak kz dependence despite its three-dimensional crystal structure51. The quasi-2D Fermi surface has been confirmed experimentally by magnetic quantum oscillation measurements55,56, where the authors emphasized that they found no evidence for the presence of any 3D Fermi surface sections. This strong experimental evidence clearly justifies the relevance of our (simplified) 2D model for describing UTe2. However, we also notice normal state electrical resistivity measurement57 and thermal conductivity measurement58 reveal the presence of 3D Fermi surfaces. While the Fermi surfaces of UTe2 are quasi-2D or 3D-like is still under debate, at least, our theoretical approach is consistent with a number of experimental results that display 2D Fermi surfaces. Superconductivity is reached at Tc = 1.6 K. The resistivity maximum observed at T⋆ ≈ 15 – 75 K15,57 and the ARPES measurement59 reveal the signature of Kondo coherence for T < T⋆ with T⋆/Tc ≈ 10– 50. This strongly suggests the co-existence between superconductivity and the Kondo correlation for T < Tc18. When a magnetic field is applied along the hard-magnetic axis b of UTe2 and before the material enters the superconducting phase, a correlated paramagnetic phase is observed below the temperature at which the magnetic susceptibility shows a broad maximum60. Similar spin-liquid behavior was also observed in the magnetic susceptibility of CePdAl61, suggesting the presence of short-range magnetic order in the correlated paramagnetic phase of UTe2. The t-RVB state we proposed here can be naturally induced by the short-range ferromagnetic fluctuations and therefore relevant for UTe2. Based on these experimental observations, our theoretical framework–competition and collaboration between Kondo-screened and ferromagnetic t-RVB spin-liquid states on a two-dimensional Kondo lattice–constitutes a promising approach to account for the above observations in UTe2. Meanwhile, the chiral in-gap state, a signature of a chiral topological superconductor, has been observed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy in the superconducting phase of UTe218. Combined with the ferromagnetic fluctuations that are known to induce spin-triplet pairing, UTe2 is considered a promising candidate for the spin-triplet chiral topological superconductor15,18. Furthermore, the co-existence of superconductivity and Kondo coherence strongly suggests the significance of the Kondo effect in UTe2, a promising candidate for TKSc.
The TKSc state with equal-spin spin-triplet p-wave pairings we proposed here bears striking similarities to and strong relevance for the experimental observations on UTe2: (i) electrons in the d- and f-orbitals with their angular momentum quantum numbers differing by 1 in the uranium atoms of UTe2 likely lead to the odd-parity Kondo effect6,7,8, (ii) the t-RVB state in our theory may be considered as one possible consequence of the short-ranged ferromagnetic fluctuations observed in UTe2, (iii) the Kondo-t-RVB co-existing superconducting state we find here qualitatively agrees with the co-existence between superconductivity and Kondo effect observed in UTe2, (iv) the high upper critical field exceeding the Pauli limit15,62 implies that the superconducting state of UTe2 may have equal-spin Cooper pairs, and (v) recent measurements on London penetration depth strongly suggest the existence of point-nodes in the superconducting gap of UTe263. We further checked that the point-node gap structure \({\overline{\Delta }}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\sigma }\) leads to a T3 dependence in the low-temperature specific heat in the 3D generalization of our model, in perfect agreement with experimental observation on UTe264 (see Supplementary Note 3).
Moreover, various characteristic temperature scales estimated from our mean-field calculations with JH = 1.0 and JK = 0.3 at finite temperatures agree reasonably well with experimental observations (see Fig. 9): The superconducting transition temperature Tc, theoretically determined from our mean-field analysis Tc = Min[T(x = 0), T(Δt = 0)], shows Tc ≈ 0.015t ≈ 2.3 K by taking estimated values of t = 150 K and half-bandwidth D = 1.25t65. The Kondo coherent scale can be obtained by T⋆ = x2(T = 0)/D ≈ 17.4 K66. The ratio T⋆/Tc ≈ 8 is in reasonable agreement with experimental observations. The onset temperature Tonset of Kondo hybridization, which occurs at x(T = Tonset) = 0, displays Tonset ≈ 0.15t ≈ 24 K, within the theoretically estimated range 10K < Tonset < 100K by DMFT calculation65. Meanwhile, there has been evidence of TRS breaking in UTe2 from the observed two superconducting transitions and a finite polar Kerr effect at T < Tc67, likely due to proximity to the ferromagnetic ordered phase. Based on the TRS breaking mentioned above, several theoretical attempts were proposed23,68. However, the observed single superconducting transition near ambient pressure and zero field60,69,70 and the theoretically proposed unitary triplet pairing51 suggest TRS may be preserved in UTe2.
Discussion
Whether or not the superconducting state of UTe2 preserves TRS requires more experimental evidence and deserves more discussions. Though our results shown above are obtained in the presence of TRS, the chiral p-wave superconducting state with chiral MZM at edges is expected to occur here once a time-reversal breaking magnetic field is applied38. Our distinct predictions with and without applying fields serve as theoretical guidance for future experiments to distinguish the time-reversal breaking from time-reversal preserving triplet pairing states in UTe2. However, a growing number of recent experimental evidence, particularly from cleaner UTe2 samples, tend to support the existence of a time-reversal preserving superconducting state71,72,73. These findings are in alignment with the predictions of our theoretical framework with TRS although the specific form factor of our superconducting order parameter may differ from the experimental predictions.
Below we make a few side remarks on our theoretical approach. Since the Kondo correlations stabilize the t-RVB spin liquid in the co-existing superconducting phase, it is expected to be robust against gauge-field fluctuations beyond the mean field. Meanwhile, we checked that the co-existing superconducting phase indeed has a lower energy than the ferromagnetic long-range ordered and t-RVB states for 0 < JH/JK < 3.6 due to the mechanism of the Kondo-stabilized spin-liquid mentioned above. However, the superconducting phase is energetically unfavorable against the ferromagnetic long-range ordered state for JH/JK > 3.6 (see Supplementary Note 5). In addition, when considering a 3D conduction band, the effective Cooper pairing manifests a point-node gap structure in the quasiparticle dispersion, resulting in the T3 behavior in specific heat. Nevertheless, recent thermal conductivity measurement on a high-quality UTe2 crystal reveals a fully-gapped superconducting state58, which is consistent with our findings based on a 2D model. Whether or not the Cooper pairing of UTe2 is fully gapped needs further investigation. Our simplified model effectively captures many essential aspects of the topological Kondo superconductivity, despite our simplified treatment of the RKKY coupling.
Meanwhile, though we adapt the odd-parity Kondo hybridization used in previous works on topological Kondo insulators6,7,8, we propose here a route to topological superconductivity via cooperation between Kondo and ferromagnetic RKKY interactions. This route to topological superconductivity has not yet been addressed. However, we acknowledge that the odd-parity Kondo hybridization we use here is not a necessity to reach the topological Kondo superconductivity. There exist alternative approaches to topological superconductivity in the heavy-fermion Kondo lattice systems without invoking odd-parity Kondo hybridization. For example, in the Kondo lattice model with Rashba spin-orbit coupled conduction band, conventional (on-site) Kondo hybridization and consequently ferromagnetic RKKY coupling, topological (p-wave triplet) superconductivity is expected to be induced by cooperation among Rashba spin-orbit, Kondo and ferromagnetic RKKY couplings despite the conventional Kondo hybridization. Meanwhile, having ferromagnetic RKKY coupling is not unique to the odd-parity Kondo hybridization. The band structure of the conduction band is usually the most important factor for the structure of RKKY coupling. In our case, we consider a simplified nearest-neighbor tight-binding conduction band near half-filling where nearly nesting of the Fermi surface may lead to competition between ferromagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic RKKY coupling through conventional (on-site) Kondo hybridization. Here, by introducing the odd-parity inter-site Kondo hybridization additional form factor is induced, which is essential to suppress anti-ferromagnetic RKKY coupling and favors ferromagnetic RKKY coupling. Nevertheless, one can alternatively start from different band structures that favor the ferromagnetic correlations. More generally, we acknowledge that there exist alternative approaches to topological superconductivity without invoking Kondo physics, such as a model with Ising-like ferromagnetic spin-spin interactions that would lead to the same pairing state. Though the heavy-fermion nature of the topological superconductivity is not a necessity, it shows great advantages in experimental realization as mentioned above.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we theoretically find a distinct type of topological superconductivity driven purely by electron correlations–the odd-parity Kondo hybridization–in a two-dimensional Kondo lattice without invoking the proximity effect on heterostructure. The proposed topological Kondo superconductor stems from the odd-parity Kondo hybridization between electrons in the itinerant c and localized f bands, with their orbital quantum numbers differing by 1. Starting from the odd-parity Anderson lattice model, we derive the odd-parity Kondo hybridization and ferromagnetic RKKY interaction mediated by the odd-parity Kondo coupling via perturbation theory, leading to spin-triplet resonating valence bond pairing between f-electrons with \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\)-wave gap symmetry. Via the mean-field approach, we find a Kondo triplet-resonating valence bond co-existing phase in the intermediate range of the Kondo to RKKY coupling ratio. We showed that this phase is a time-reversal invariant spin-triplet \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\)-wave topological superconducting state, exhibiting non-trivial topology in the bulk and supporting helical Majorana zero modes at edges. Our results offer a comprehensive understanding of the experimental observations on UTe2, a promising candidate for topological Kondo superconductors. Our approach to topological superconductivity via Kondo physics shows advantages over the heterostructure approach by proximity effect and provides a paradigm to guide the search for topological superconductors induced by electron correlations.
Methods
The Kondo-Heisenberg-like lattice model
The explicit form of the Kondo and RKKY-like magnetic interaction terms, HK and HJ, is specified here in more detail. The HK term, by performing Schrieffer-Wolff transformation on Eq. (1), takes the form of
with \({J}_{K}=\frac{{V}^{2}}{U+{\varepsilon }_{f}-\mu }+\frac{{V}^{2}}{\mu -{\varepsilon }_{f}} > 0\). Different from the conventional on-site Kondo interaction, Eq. (8) describes the screening of impurity by its neighboring conduction electrons.
The RKKY-like magnetic interaction HJ is given by
where \({J}_{ij}\equiv J\left(\left\vert {{{{\boldsymbol{R}}}}}_{ij}\right\vert \right)\) is shown in Eq. (3) with Rij ≡ ri − rj. Here, the first and second lines of Eq. (9) correspond to the spin-triplet (S = 1) channel, while the last line corresponds to the single-singlet ((S = 0)) channel. Derivations of HJ above are provided in Supplementary Note 2. Since our model is on a two-dimensional lattice and the dominant contribution JH < 0, Eq. (9) can be simplified as
Eq. (10) is the origin of the equal-spin RVB pairing states, \(\left\vert \uparrow \uparrow \right\rangle\) and \(\left\vert \downarrow \downarrow \right\rangle\), we proposed in this paper.
Mean-field theory
With the choice of ϕA(k) and ϕB(k) shown in the main text, the mean-field Kondo-Heisenberg model HMF can be expressed as a summation of two decoupled 4 × 4 matrices: \({H}_{MF}={\sum }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}},I}{\phi }_{I}^{{{\dagger}} }({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}){{{{\mathscr{H}}}}}_{I}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}){\phi }_{I}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})+{{{\mathscr{C}}}}\) with
Diagonalizing \({{{{\mathscr{H}}}}}_{A/B}\), we obtain eight quasiparticle energy bands,
where \({{{{\mathscr{X}}}}}_{A(B)}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})=({\varepsilon }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{2}+{\lambda }^{2}+4{\vert {\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\downarrow (\uparrow )}\vert }^{2}+2{\vert {V}_{2(1){{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}\vert }^{2})/8\) and \({{{{\mathscr{Y}}}}}_{A(B)}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})={({\varepsilon }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}\lambda -{\vert {V}_{2(1){{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}\vert }^{2})}^{2}/16+{\varepsilon }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{2}{\vert {\Delta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}}^{\downarrow (\uparrow )}\vert }^{2}/4\).
The mean-field Kondo-Heisenberg Hamiltonian possesses TRS: HA and HB constitute the time-reversal partner of each other, i.e. \(\hat{\Theta }{H}_{A(B)}{\hat{\Theta }}^{-1}={H}_{B(A)}\) where the time-reversal operator \(\hat{\Theta }={\tau }^{0}\otimes {\rho }^{0}\otimes (-i{\sigma }^{y})K\) with σy being the y-component Pauli matrix on the spin subspace, τ0(ρ0) being a 2 × 2 identity matrix on the particle-hole (orbital) subspace while K being the complex-conjugate operator. The time-reversal operator flips the spin and quasi-momentum of the conduction (c) and local fermion (f) operators: \(\left({c}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow },\,{c}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow },\,{f}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow },\,{f}_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow }\right){\longrightarrow }^{\hat{\Theta }}\left({c}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow },\,-{c}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow },\,{f}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\downarrow },\,-{f}_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\uparrow }\right)\). Meanwhile, HMF respects charge-conjugation (particle-hole) symmetry: \(\hat{{{{\mathscr{P}}}}}{{{{\mathscr{H}}}}}_{MF}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}){\hat{{{{\mathscr{P}}}}}}^{-1}=-{{{{\mathscr{H}}}}}_{MF}(-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})\) where \(\hat{{{{\mathscr{P}}}}}\equiv {\tau }^{x}K\) is the particle-hole operator with τx being the x-component of the Pauli matrices. Due to the odd-parity \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\) RVB pairing, the parity symmetry is broken in our model.
This \(p\pm i{p}^{{\prime} }\) gap structure for the up- and down-spin sectors in Eq. (11) corresponds to the following real-space patterns, \({\Delta }_{t}^{\uparrow }(i,j)\) and \({\Delta }_{t}^{\downarrow }(i,j)\) as defined in Eq. (4):
and
The explicit form of the zero-temperature saddle-point equations via minimizing the mean-field free energy per site \({{{{\mathscr{F}}}}}_{MF}\) with respect to the mean-field variables q ∈ (λ, x, Δt, μ), i.e., \(\partial {{{{\mathscr{F}}}}}_{MF}/\partial q=-(1+\delta ){\delta }_{q,\mu }\), is shown below:
Emergence of superconductivity from heavy-fermion bands
In this section, we would like to illustrate more clearly how the superconductivity develops out of the heavy-fermion bands by opening a superconducting gap at the Fermi energy through the BCS mechanism when the temperature gets below Tc (see Fig. 8 and Ref. 74). To start with, we consider the temperature T < Tonset at which the hybridized bands are developed. We define the two hybridized bands as αkσ and βkσ, both of which are linear combinations of the original c and f fermions. We further assume that αkσ (flatter) corresponds to the band close to the Fermi energy while βkσ (more dispersive) is remote from the Fermi energy. As the temperature is decreased below the superconductivity transition temperature Tc, the Cooper pairs are formed out of the α- and β-bands. The superconductivity can be naturally described through the BCS process by including terms like \({\alpha }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\sigma }^{{{\dagger}} }{\alpha }_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}{\sigma }^{{\prime} }}^{{{\dagger}} }\) and \({\beta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\sigma }^{{{\dagger}} }{\beta }_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}{\sigma }^{{\prime} }}^{{{\dagger}} }\) (neglecting the cross terms) in the model. If we consider low doping where the Fermi level intercepts with the flat α-band, the superconducting gap is expected to be opened on the Fermi level. Therefore, the pairing term on the remote β-band, \({\beta }_{{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\sigma }^{{{\dagger}} }{\beta }_{-{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}{\sigma }^{{\prime} }}^{{{\dagger}} }\), can be neglected.
Data availability
The numerical data created for the study are available on the zenodo.org platform: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.775900075.
Code availability
The codes to generate the main results and figures are available on the zenodo.org platform: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7759000.
References
Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).
Alicea, J. New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012).
Lutchyn, R. M., Sau, J. D. & Das Sarma, S. Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010).
Oreg, Y., Refael, G. & von Oppen, F. Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010).
Gaidamauskas, E., Paaske, J. & Flensberg, K. Majorana bound states in two-channel time-reversal-symmetric nanowire systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 126402 (2014).
Dzero, M., Xia, J., Galitski, V. & Coleman, P. Topological Kondo insulators. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 249–280 (2016).
Dzero, M., Sun, K., Coleman, P. & Galitski, V. Theory of topological Kondo insulators. Phys. Rev. B 85, 045130 (2012).
Dzero, M., Sun, K., Galitski, V. & Coleman, P. Topological Kondo insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 106408 (2010).
Lai, H.-H., Grefe, S. E., Paschen, S. & Si, Q. Weyl Kondo semimetal in heavy-fermion systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 93–97 (2018).
Chen, L. et al. Topological semimetal driven by strong correlations and crystalline symmetry. Nat. Phys. 18, 1341–1346 (2022).
Mackenzie, A. P. & Maeno, Y. The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657–712 (2003).
Maeno, Y., Kittaka, S., Nomura, T., Yonezawa, S. & Ishida, K. Evaluation of spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 011009 (2012).
Kallin, C. & Berlinsky, A. J. Is Sr2RuO4 a chiral p-wave superconductor? J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 164210 (2009).
Xu, X., Li, Y. & Chien, C. L. Spin-triplet pairing state evidenced by half-quantum flux in a noncentrosymmetric superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167001 (2020).
Ran, S. et al. Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity. Science 365, 684–687 (2019).
Ran, S. et al. Extreme magnetic field-boosted superconductivity. Nat. Phys. 15, 1250–1254 (2019).
Aoki, D. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in heavy fermion UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 043702 (2019).
Jiao, L. et al. Chiral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal UTe2. Nature 579, 523–527 (2020).
Aoki, D. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in UTe2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 34, 41 (2022).
Choi, W., Klein, P. W., Rosch, A. & Kim, Y. B. Topological superconductivity in the Kondo-Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. B 98, 155123 (2018).
Schrieffer, J. R. & Wolff, P. A. Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. 149, 491–492 (1966).
Hewson, A. C. The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions. Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Hazra, T. & Coleman, P. Triplet pairing mechanisms from Hund’s-Kondo models: applications to UTe2 and CeRh2As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 136002 (2023).
Hsu, C. H., Stano, P., Klinovaja, J. & Loss, D. Antiferromagnetic nuclear spin helix and topological superconductivity in 13C nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 92, 235435 (2015).
Doniach, S. The Kondo lattice and weak antiferromagnetism. Phys. B+C. 91, 231–234 (1977).
Menth, A., Buehler, E. & Geballe, T. H. Magnetic and semiconducting properties of SmB6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 295–297 (1969).
Maple, M. B. & Wohlleben, D. Nonmagnetic 4f shell in the high-pressure phase of sms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 511–515 (1971).
Terashima, T. T. et al. Magnetization process of the Kondo insulator ybb12 in ultrahigh magnetic fields. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 054710 (2017).
Si, Q., Zhu, J.-X. & Grempel, D. R. Magnetic quantum phase transitions in kondo lattices. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, R1025 (2005).
Wang, J., Chang, Y.-Y. & Chung, C.-H. A mechanism for the strange metal phase in rare-earth intermetallic compounds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116980119 (2022).
Legner, M. Topological Kondo Insulators: Materials at the Interface of Topology and Strong Correlations. Doctoral Thesis (ETH Zurich, Zürich, 2016).
Ruderman, M. A. & Kittel, C. Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons. Phys. Rev. 96, 99–102 (1954).
Van Vleck, J. H. Note on the interactions between the spins of magnetic ions or nuclei in metals. Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 681–686 (1962).
Kirchner, S. et al. Colloquium: heavy-electron quantum criticality and single-particle spectroscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 011002 (2020).
Nevidomskyy, A. H. Coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity close to a quantum phase transition: the Heisenberg- to ising-type crossover. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 097003 (2005).
Mineev, V. & Samokhin, K. V. Introduction to Unconventional Superconductivity (Taylor & Francis, 1999). https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=2BXYWT8m068C.
Frigeri, P. A., Agterberg, D. F., Koga, A. & Sigrist, M. Superconductivity without Inversion Symmetry: MnSi versus CePt3Si. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 097001 (2004).
Sato, M. & Fujimoto, S. Topological phases of noncentrosymmetric superconductors: edge states, majorana fermions, and non-abelian statistics. Phys. Rev. B 79, 094504 (2009).
Coleman, P. Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2015).
Schnyder, A. P., Ryu, S., Furusaki, A. & Ludwig, A. W. W. Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008).
Coleman, P. & Andrei, N. Kondo-stabilised spin liquids and heavy fermion superconductivity. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 4057–4080 (1989).
Coleman, P. & Nevidomskyy, A. H. Frustration and the Kondo effect in heavy fermion materials. J. Low. Temp. Phys. 161, 182–202 (2010).
Senthil, T., Sachdev, S. & Vojta, M. Fractionalized fermi liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003).
Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump. Phys. Rev. B 74, 195312 (2006).
Fu, L., Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).
Sheng, D. N., Weng, Z. Y., Sheng, L. & Haldane, F. D. M. Quantum Spin-Hall effect and topologically invariant chern numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036808 (2006).
Thouless, D. J., Kohmoto, M., Nightingale, M. P. & den Nijs, M. Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405–408 (1982).
Fukui, T., Hatsugai, Y. & Suzuki, H. Chern numbers in discretized Brillouin zone: efficient method of computing (Spin) Hall conductances. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1674–1677 (2005).
Aoki, D. et al. Multiple superconducting phases and unusual enhancement of the upper critical field in UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 89. https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.89.053705 (2020).
Ishizuka, J. & Yanase, Y. Periodic Anderson model for magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 103, 94504 (2021).
Xu, Y., Sheng, Y. & Yang, Y.-f Quasi-two-dimensional fermi surfaces and unitary spin-triplet pairing in the heavy fermion superconductor UTe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 217002 (2019).
Tokunaga, Y. et al. 125Te-NMR study on a single crystal of heavy fermion superconductor UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 73701 (2019).
Sundar, S. et al. Coexistence of ferromagnetic fluctuations and superconductivity in the actinide superconductor UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 140502 (2019).
Duan, C. et al. Resonance from antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations for superconductivity in UTe2. Nature 600, 636–640 (2021).
Aoki, D. et al. First observation of the de Haas-van Alphen effect and fermi surfaces in the unconventional superconductor UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 083704 (2022).
Eaton, A. G. et al. Quasi-2D Fermi surface in the anomalous superconductor UTe2. Nat. Commun. 15, 223 (2024).
Eo, Y. S. et al. c-axis transport in UTe2: evidence of three-dimensional conductivity component. Phys. Rev. B 106, L060505 (2022).
Suetsugu, S. et al. Fully gapped pairing state in spin-triplet superconductor UTe2. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk3772 (2024).
Fujimori, S.-i et al. Electronic structure of UTe2 studied by photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 103701 (2019).
Braithwaite, D. et al. Multiple superconducting phases in a nearly ferromagnetic system. Commun. Phys. 2, 147 (2019).
Zhao, H. et al. Quantum-critical phase from frustrated magnetism in a strongly correlated metal. Nat. Phys. 15, 1261–1266 (2019).
Aoki, D. et al. Spin-triplet superconductivity in UTe2 and ferromagnetic superconductors. JPS Conf. Proc. 30, 011065 (2020).
Wu, T. C., Pal, H. K., Hosur, P. & Foster, M. S. Power-law temperature dependence of the penetration depth in a topological superconductor due to surface states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 067001 (2020).
Metz, T. et al. Point-node gap structure of the spin-triplet superconductor UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 220504 (2019).
Miao, L. et al. Low energy band structure and symmetries of UTe2 from angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 076401 (2020).
Burdin, S., Georges, A. & Grempel, D. R. Coherence scale of the Kondo lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1048–1051 (2000).
Hayes, I. M. et al. Multicomponent superconducting order parameter in UTe2. Science 373, 797–801 (2021).
Shishidou, T., Suh, H. G., Brydon, P. M. R., Weinert, M. & Agterberg, D. F. Topological band and superconductivity in UTe2. Phys. Rev. B 103, 104504 (2021).
Rosa, P. F. S. et al. Single thermodynamic transition at 2 K in superconducting UTe2 single crystals. Commun. Mater. 3, 33 (2022).
Rosuel, A. et al. Field-induced tuning of the pairing state in a superconductor. Phys. Rev. X 13, 011022 (2023).
Ajeesh, M. O. et al. Fate of time-reversal symmetry breaking in UTe2. Phys. Rev. X 13, 41019 (2023).
Azari, N. et al. Absence of spontaneous magnetic fields due to time-reversal symmetry breaking in bulk superconducting UTe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 226504 (2023).
Theuss, F. et al. Single-component superconductivity in UTe2 at ambient pressure. Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02493-1 (2024).
Chang, Y. Y. et al. Strange superconductivity near an antiferromagnetic heavy-fermion quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. B 99, 094513 (2019).
Chang, Y.-Y. et al. Topological Kondo superconductors. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7759000 (2023).
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate helpful discussions with C. H. Hsu, D. Aoki, Q. Gu, T. Hazra, and P. Coleman. C.-H.C. acknowledges the support by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of Taiwan Grants 110-2112-M-A49-018-MY3, 111-2124-M-A-49-009-, 112-2124-M-A49-003-, the Center for Theoretical and Computational Physics (CTCP) of NYCU, and the National Center for Theoretical Sciences of Taiwan, Republic of China. Y.-Y.C. acknowledges the financial support from The 2023 Postdoctoral Scholar Program of Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.H.C. conceived the study and led the project. Theoretical calculations were performed by Y.Y.C., K.V.N., and K.L.C. The manuscript was written by Y.Y.C. and C.H.C. Y.Y.C., K.V.N., K.L.C., Y.W.L., C.Y.M. and C.H.C. participated in discussions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, YY., Van Nguyen, K., Chen, KL. et al. Correlation-driven topological Kondo superconductors. Commun Phys 7, 253 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01749-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01749-9
- Springer Nature Limited