Abstract
Reconciling protein functional data with crystal structure is arduous because rare conformations or crystallization artifacts occur. Here we present a tool to validate the dimensions of open pore structures of potassium-selective ion channels. We used freely available algorithms to calculate the molecular contour of the pore to determine the effective internal pore radius (rE) in several K-channel crystal structures. rE was operationally defined as the radius of the biggest sphere able to enter the pore from the cytosolic side. We obtained consistent rE estimates for MthK and Kv1.2/2.1 structures, with rE = 5.3–5.9 Å and rE = 4.5–5.2 Å, respectively. We compared these structural estimates with functional assessments of the internal mouth radii of capture (rC) for two electrophysiological counterparts, the large conductance calcium activated K-channel (rC = 2.2 Å) and the Shaker Kv-channel (rC = 0.8 Å), for MthK and Kv1.2/2.1 structures, respectively. Calculating the difference between rE and rC, produced consistent size radii of 3.1–3.7 Å and 3.6–4.4 Å for hydrated K+ ions. These hydrated K+ estimates harmonize with others obtained with diverse experimental and theoretical methods. Thus, these findings validate MthK and the Kv1.2/2.1 structures as templates for open BK and Kv-channels, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
K-channel crystal structures reveal that they are machines optimized for efficient and selective K+ ion transport. Thanks to the groundbreaking work from the Mackinnon lab, we know the structure of several K-channels in detail1. A great deal of effort has been invested in building a conceptual scaffold that makes functional sense of these K-channel structures. In the pore domain of K-channels, this scaffold works pretty well for understanding toxin binding and K+ selectivity. This is partly because the external vestibule and the selectivity filters are experimentally more accessible and also because of the low variance in atom’s space coordinates among different K-channels across diverse crystallization conditions2,3,4,5,6. Thus, the structure of the external vestibule together with that of the selectivity filter enjoy a solid functional reputation. By contrast, the internal vestibule of the pore seems to be much less well-defined. On one hand, the dimensions of the cytosolic aspects of the pore structure differ from channel to channel in the various crystal structures3,5,7,8. On the other, the internal vestibule seems to be the flexible part of the protein where the voltage controlled gate is located. For example, the structures of KcsA (PDB:1K4C) and Slo2.2 (PDB:5A6E) seem to correspond to channels crystallized in the closed conformation because their pore’s internal opening size is smaller than that of a hydrated K+ 5,9. Meanwhile, the structures of the bacterial MthK (PDB: 4HYO) and of the mammalian Kv1.2/2.1 paddle chimera (PDB: 2R9R) appear to be those of open channels, with the MthK internal vestibule being ~10 Å wider than that of Kv1.2/2.13,7,10,11.
The size difference in the pore internal vestibule in the structure of the MthK vs. the Kv1.2/2.1 chimera structure was somehow electrophysiologically corroborated in their functional counterparts, the mouse large conductance calcium and voltage gated K+-channel (BK) and the Drosophila voltage gated Shaker K+-channel, respectively. Cysteine substitution scanning accessibility experiments12,13 in Shaker and BK channels and also side-chain volume changes in residues located at the internal entrance of BK14, suggested a pore several angstrom wider than Shaker’s. Nevertheless in diffusional determinations of their radii of capture, BK is only ~1.4 Å wider (see below)15,16. To what extent do these differences represent structurally different K-channels, or do they just reflect diverse conformations? Are they the result of rarely visited conformational states or are they caused by crystallization artifacts? These questions are especially important when, based on sequence homology or functional properties such as single channel conductance and pharmacology, we use the atomic coordinates of one channel as a structural template for a distantly related one, as is the case when using the structure of MthK to model the BK channel.
Here, we present a simple methodology to estimate the functional dimensions of the internal entrance to the pore in K+-channel structural models. Briefly: for several K+-channel crystal structures we first estimated their effective pore size17 and then compared these values with functional estimations of their diffusional radius of capture obtained from diffusion limited unitary currents15,16,18,19,20. To validate the methodology, the difference between these two estimates must equal robust approximations of the hydrodynamic radius of K+ ions.
The Effective Pore Size
The effective dimension for permeation in a K+-channel pore is determined by the effective size of the K+ ion, which, in turn, is determined by the average number of water molecules forming its hydration shell. At one extreme, if K+ ion coming from the cytosolic side were a point charge, having no physical dimension and no hydration shell and the protein were a rigid structure, the effective sectional area to pass should be delimited by the Van der Waals envelope of the pore entrance21. But if instead K+ were a solid spherical body of finite dimensions, it will not pass across surface tortuosities smaller than its own size, resulting in a less rugose and decreased, sectional area available for permeation. In this other extreme, if the hydrated K+-complex is larger than the pore entrance, it will not enter. In this latter case, from the ion’s perspective, the pore is closed. Thus, if we assume the ion to be a rigid spherical probe of variable size moving into a circular pore, we define the effective pore radius (rE) as the radius of the largest sphere that is able to pass through the pore17.
To estimate rE on potassium channel structures we used freely available algorithms (SURF, MSMS and HOLLOW). These routines calculate the molecular surface of proteins left by the contact of rigid spherical test probes of variable radius. In SURF and MSMS the probe is rolled on top of the Van der Waals surface of the channel structure21,22,23 (Fig. 1 in21). When the probe contacts simultaneously more than one atom, these contacts produce a series of disconnected patches that are filled with concave surfaces having the probe´s curvature. Thus, the resulting envelope is a molecular surface that is less detailed as the probe grows bigger (See for example first column in Fig. 1). On the other hand, HOLLOW consisted in filling the protein holes and voids with virtual overlapping oxygen atoms placed at fixed intervals defined in a 0.2–0.5 Å cubic grid24. The molecular surface is then defined by the envelope of the virtual oxygen atoms that are not contacted by the probe (See for example second column in Fig. 1).
Examples of the molecular surfaces left by SURF and HOLLOW (Fig. 1) show that smaller probes go inside the cavity defining a detailed molecular surface of the pore walls, whereas bigger probes leave poorer surface detail. Probes big enough will not be able to enter, transforming the pore into another dimple in the protein surface. When this condition is satisfied (Bottom row), we state a 0.1 Å smaller radius as the biggest probe able to enter, defining the effective pore radius, rE17. This 0.1 Å dissimilarity makes a dramatic difference in the probe’s ability to enter into the inner vestibule (compare the middle with the bottom row).
We measured rE in all crystallographic structures available today of four different K+-channels: Kv1.2/2.1 paddle-chimera, KvAP, MthK and KcsA channels (Table 1). For Kv 1.2/2.1, SURF, MSMS and HOLLOW gave “average” values of rE = 4.5 Å, rE = 4.5 Å and rE = 5.2 Å, respectively. For KvAP, rE values were less regular but, in general agreed with those of Kv1.2/2.1. Also, for MthK, rE = 5.3–5.6 Å, rE = 5.3–5.5 Å and rE = 5.7–6.0 Å, for SURF, MSMS and HOLLOW, respectively. For KcsA rE values were much smaller, as expected for a closed channel.
The Radius of Capture
We compared rE with functional estimates of radius of capture (rC) in the two counterparts of the MthK and Kv1.2/2.1 structures: the BK and the Shaker channels, respectively15,16 (To our knowledge, these are the only rC estimates available for K+-channels). rC is an assessment of the dimension of the pore’s entrance obtained from single channel current measurements in a regime in which diffusion of K+ ions into the pore entrance is the rate limiting step for passage through the channel. If the transmembrane voltage and/or the recording solution viscosity are high enough, as the applied voltage increases the unitary ionic current departs significantly from the Ohms law; approaching a plateau. This asymptotic saturation amplitude represents the diffusion limited rate with which ions approach the channel entrance. Thus, the bigger the pore entrance, or the higher the ion concentration, or the larger the diffusion coefficient, the higher is the limiting asymptotic current. If the pore is assumed to be a hemispheric sink into which approaching ions vanish, it is possible from diffusional collisions theory to infer its dimension from the limited unitary current, iDL, according to15,16,18,19,20.
where z is the permeant ion valence, eo the elementary charge, c the bulk ion concentration and D its diffusion coefficient. If the permeant ion is a point charge, rC represents the average radius of the pore’s entrance15,18. However, because ions have finite size and pores usually aren’t circular, shape and size must be considered. For simplicity, let’s assume that ions are solid spheres reaching a circular pore with radius rO, then,
where rK is the ion´s spherical radius15,18,20. For point charges, rO = rC. However, for a given, experimentally obtained rC, estimates of rO will grows linearly with rK, because the number of effective collisions will be indistinguishable from those produced by point charges having identical radial deviations from the central trajectory16.
To reach asymptotic currents values at experimentally possible voltages (between 100–350 mV), 2 molar sucrose was added to the cytosolic recording solution to increase viscosity by ~7-fold and values of rC = 2.2 Å and rC = 0.8 Å, were obtained for BK and Shaker internal entrances, respectively15,16. According to Eq. 2, by knowing rK, we could obtain rO, their vestibule average radius; nevertheless, the hydrated ion size is not well defined, in part because hydration is a fuzzy arrangement of water molecules bound with dissimilar energies and lifetimes15,16,25.
To compare structural (rE) with functional (rC) estimates of the internal pore vestibule, here we make rO = rE, then:
To be meaningful, Eq. 3 must provide consistent estimates for rK. In fact, Table 1 show that this was true across all structural models and channel types, regardless of the surface calculation algorithm used. Although, HOLLOW gave consistently larger estimates, rK fell mostly in the 3.5–4.0 Å interval, providing a robust validation for pore openings dimensions. Strikingly, the values for rK are well in agreement with the hydrated size of K+ ions estimates obtained using other very different experimental and theoretical methods25,26,27,28,29. A 3.5–4 Å radius sphere occupies a volume of 180–270 Å3 which is comparable to the anti-prismatic geometric arrangement of waters co-crystalized “in flagrante” with K+ in the KcsA structure (~300 Å3)4,30 and in agreement with several studies, suggest a coordination number of 8 or less25,26,27,29. Of course, our intention is not to provide another estimate of the hydrodynamic size of hydrated K+ but to show the robustness of Eq. 3 in comparing structural and functional data.
We should bear in mind that the rC estimates are restricted to the hydrated path to the pore entrance and may contain two sources of error: on the one hand, an overestimation of rC arises with the presence of the gating ring in BK and the tetramerization domain in Shaker. In typical recording solutions, both contribute modestly to single channel conductance (up to 30%) by increasing the local K+ concentration in corresponding proportion9,31,32. On the other hand, a narrowing of the hydrated path promoted by the hydrophobic nature of the channel’s inner cavity residues may cause an underestimation of the sectional access to the pore; nevertheless at very positive voltages the water content in the cavity matches the cavity’s volume33. In this regard, it is interesting to note that our estimates of rE for Kv1.2/2.1 chimera are in the 4.4–5.2 Å range, just enough to allow K+ hydration to occur in this confined space as in bulk solution, according to molecular dynamics calculations on Shaker34. In narrower pores, hydration number decreases and the energetic cost of putting ions inside may be too high to make permeation possible34. In contrast, a wider cavity as MthK with rE = 5.3–5.9 Å, may provide the incoming hydrated K+ with a second, loosely attached hydration shell that may reduce the ion’s energy and/or the friction of its rigid hydration cage16,34,35.
The rC estimates shown here stem from studies in liquid phase, at room temperature, away from equilibrium and with fully operative friction forces15,16,20. By contrast, K+ channel structures are obtained at low temperature, in solid phase and in equilibrium. Thus, the agreement between these functional and structural data is satisfying. They gave consistent estimations of the hydrodynamic radius of K+ ions in physiological solutions and, while we cannot ascertain the degree of opening of KvAP structures, we can propose that KcsA structures are closed, whereas Kv1.2/2.1, KvAP and MthK are bona fide open channels having different pore dimensions, possibly explaining differences in unitary conductance16.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Moldenhauer, H. et al. Effective pore size and radius of capture for K+ ions in K-channels. Sci. Rep. 6, 19893; doi: 10.1038/srep19893 (2016).
References
MacKinnon, R. Potassium channels and the atomic basis of selective ion conduction (Nobel Lecture). Angewandte Chemie (International ed 43, 4265–4277 (2004).
Banerjee, A., Lee, A., Campbell, E. & Mackinnon, R. Structure of a pore-blocking toxin in complex with a eukaryotic voltage-dependent K(+) channel. eLife 2, e00594 (2013).
Jiang, Y. et al. The open pore conformation of potassium channels. Nature 417, 523–526 (2002).
Zhou, Y., Morais-Cabral, J. H., Kaufman, A. & MacKinnon, R. Chemistry of ion coordination and hydration revealed by a K+ channel-Fab complex at 2.0 A resolution. Nature 414, 43–48 (2001).
Doyle, D. A. et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69–77 (1998).
MacKinnon, R., Cohen, S. L., Kuo, A., Lee, A. & Chait, B. T. Structural conservation in prokaryotic and eukaryotic potassium channels. Science 280, 106–109 (1998).
Long, S. B., Tao, X., Campbell, E. B. & MacKinnon, R. Atomic structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel in a lipid membrane-like environment. Nature 450, 376–382 (2007).
Zhou, M., Morais-Cabral, J. H., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. Potassium channel receptor site for the inactivation gate and quaternary amine inhibitors. Nature 411, 657–661 (2001).
Hite, R. K. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Slo2.2 Na-activated K channel. Nature 10.1038/nature14958. (2015).
Posson, D. J., McCoy, J. G. & Nimigean, C. M. The voltage-dependent gate in MthK potassium channels is located at the selectivity filter. Nature structural & molecular biology 20, 159–166 (2013).
Long, S. B., Campbell, E. B. & Mackinnon, R. Crystal structure of a mammalian voltage-dependent Shaker family K+ channel. Science 309, 897–903 (2005).
Zhou, Y., Xia, X. M. & Lingle, C. J. Cysteine scanning and modification reveal major differences between BK channels and Kv channels in the inner pore region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 12161–12166 (2011).
del Camino, D., Kanevsky, M. & Yellen, G. Status of the intracellular gate in the activated-not-open state of shaker K+ channels. J Gen Physiol 126, 419–428 (2005).
Geng, Y., Niu, X. & Magleby, K. L. Low resistance, large dimension entrance to the inner cavity of BK channels determined by changing side-chain volume. J Gen Physiol 137, 533–548 (2011).
Brelidze, T. I. & Magleby, K. L. Probing the geometry of the inner vestibule of BK channels with sugars. J Gen Physiol 126, 105–121 (2005).
Diaz-Franulic, I., Sepulveda, R. V., Navarro-Quezada, N., Gonzalez-Nilo, F. & Naranjo, D. Pore dimensions and the role of occupancy in unitary conductance of Shaker K channels. J Gen Physiol 146, 133–146 (2015).
Ferry, J. D. Statistical Evaluation of Sieve Constants in Ultrafiltration. J Gen Physiol 20, 95–104 (1936).
Andersen, O. S. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. Studies on the diffusion-controlled association step. Biophysical journal 41, 147–165 (1983).
Andersen, O. S. & Procopio, J. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. On the importance of the aqueous diffusion resistance and ion-water interactions. Acta physiologica Scandinavica 481, 27–35 (1980).
Lauger, P. Diffusion-limited ion flow through pores. Biochimica et biophysica acta 455, 493–509 (1976).
Richards, F. M. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering 6, 151–176 (1977).
Sanner, M. F., Olson, A. J. & Spehner, J. C. Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 38, 305–320 (1996).
Varshney, A., Brooks Jr, F. P. & Wright, W. V. Computing smooth molecular surfaces. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 14, 19-25%@ 0272–1716 (1994).
Ho, B. K. & Gruswitz, F. HOLLOW: generating accurate representations of channel and interior surfaces in molecular structures. BMC structural biology 8, 49 (2008).
Enderby, J. E. Ion solvation via neutron scattering. Chemical Society Reviews 24, 159–168 (1995).
Glezakou, V.-A., Chen, Y., Fulton, J., Schenter, G. & Dang, L. Electronic structure, statistical mechanical simulations and EXAFS spectroscopy of aqueous potassium. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 115, 86–99 (2006).
Mancinelli, R., Botti, A., Bruni, F., Ricci, M. A. & Soper, A. K. Hydration of Sodium, Potassium and Chloride Ions in Solution and the Concept of Structure Maker/Breaker. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 111, 13570–13577 (2007).
Bankura, A., Carnevale, V. & Klein, M. L. Hydration structure of salt solutions from ab initio molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 138, 014501 (2014).
Hille, B. Ion channels of excitable membranes. 3rd edn, (Sinauer, 2001).
Miller, C. See potassium run. Nature 414, 23–24 (2001).
Kobertz, W. R. & Miller, C. K+ channels lacking the ‘tetramerization’ domain: implications for pore structure. Nature structural biology 6, 1122–1125 (1999).
Budelli, G., Geng, Y., Butler, A., Magleby, K. L. & Salkoff, L. Properties of Slo1 K+ channels with and without the gating ring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 16657–16662 (2013).
Jensen, M. O. et al. Principles of conduction and hydrophobic gating in K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 5833–5838 (2010).
Treptow, W. & Tarek, M. Molecular restraints in the permeation pathway of ion channels. Biophysical journal 91, L26–28 (2006).
Parsegian, A. Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems. Nature 221, 844–846 (1969).
Lee, S. Y., Lee, A., Chen, J. & MacKinnon, R. Structure of the KvAP voltage-dependent K+ channel and its dependence on the lipid membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15441–15446 (2005).
Jiang, Y. et al. X-ray structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel. Nature 423, 33–41 (2003).
Ye, S., Li, Y. & Jiang, Y. Novel insights into K+ selectivity from high-resolution structures of an open K+ channel pore. Nature structural & molecular biology 17, 1019–1023 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank Javier Cáceres, Tomas Pérez-Acle and the Galvani group for discussions, John Ewer (CINV) and Bill Griesar (WSU-Vancouver and nwnoggin.org) for critical reading of the manuscript. Supported by Fondecyt #1120819 and #1131003, by ACT1107 and by ICM-P09-022-F. The Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaíso (CINV) is a Millennium Institute supported by the Millennium Scientific Initiative of the Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Turismo. ID-F was funded by Fraunhofer-Chile and HM is a CINV postdoctoral fellow.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.M. and I.D.-F. were involved in all aspects of the project. D.N. supervised the overall study, data analysis and writing. H.M., I.D.-F., F.G.-N. and D.N. contributed to manuscript preparation.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Moldenhauer, H., Díaz-Franulic, I., González-Nilo, F. et al. Effective pore size and radius of capture for K+ ions in K-channels. Sci Rep 6, 19893 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19893
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19893
- Springer Nature Limited