Abstract
We present a theoretical study of the electronic structures of freestanding nanowires made from gallium phosphide (GaP)—a III-V semiconductor with an indirect bulk bandgap. We consider [001]-oriented GaP nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections and [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with hexagonal cross sections. Based on tight binding models, both the band structures and wave functions of the nanowires are calculated. For the [001]-oriented GaP nanowires, the bands show anti-crossing structures, while the bands of the [111]-oriented nanowires display crossing structures. Two minima are observed in the conduction bands, while the maximum of the valence bands is always at the Γ-point. Using double group theory, we analyze the symmetry properties of the lowest conduction band states and highest valence band states of GaP nanowires with different sizes and directions. The band state wave functions of the lowest conduction bands and the highest valence bands of the nanowires are evaluated by spatial probability distributions. For practical use, we fit the confinement energies of the electrons and holes in the nanowires to obtain an empirical formula.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Gallium phosphide (GaP) is an important Group III-V semiconductor material with a wide band gap of 2.272 eV at 300 K, making it attractive for use in optical devices, light-emitting diodes and photoelectrochemical cells1,2,3. In recent years, GaP nanostructures have received considerable attention because of their potential applications in miniature optical and optoelectronic devices with enhanced performances and functyionalities4,5,6,7. GaP nanowires are often grown by the vapour–liquid–solid growth mechanism, which can provide nanowires with different crystal structures8. Typical dimensions of nanowires are diameters of the order of a few to one hundred nanometers and lengths of several micrometers. The techniques used to grow nanowires have been well developed during the last two decades. It is possible to tailor both the crystal phase and geometry of nanowire arrays, allowing control of the optoelectronic characteristics of semiconductors4,5,6. In addition, nanowires, nanowire heterostructures and superlattices can be doped in a controlled manner9,10,11. For further development and optimization of devices containing nanowires, it is important to clearly understand the electronic structures of the nanowires along common crystallographic directions such as the [001] and [111] directions. Previously, theoretical methods, such as first-principles methods12,13,14,15, the k·p method16,17,18, pseudopotential methods19 and tight-binding methods20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, have been used to study semiconductor nanowires. However, first-principles calculations are impractical for unit cells containing tens of thousands of atoms. Although the k·p method can generally give a solution for the band states around the Γ-point, it will sometimes overestimate the symmetry of a system and could not be applied for a semiconductor system with an indirect bandgap. Compared with other approaches, tight-binding methods satisfy the accuracy condition and have the advantage of atomistic description at the nanometer scale. Tight-binding methods are capable to calculate the electronic structures of nanowires made from a semiconductor with an indirect bandgap and can easily be used to accurately treat the band structures of the nanowires with diameters in the range of a few nanometers to more than one hundred nanometers in the whole Brillouin zone30,31,32,33.
In this paper, a tight-binding formalism that considers sp3s∗ nearest-neighbour and spin–orbit interactions is used to calculate the electronic structures of [001]- and [111]-oriented GaP nanowires including their energy bands and wave functions. Bulk GaP is an indirect bandgap material and the minima of its conduction bands are located near the X-point and the lowest set of conduction bands shows a camel back structure24,34,35,36. The bands of nanostructures are more complex in terms of band folding and quantum confinement compared with those of the bulk material. It is important to choose a suitable set of available parameters to obtain reliable results, otherwise along some crystallographic directions, the band structures of GaP nanowires may show direction-dependent bandgap characteristics even for nanowires of larger sizes24,32,37. We take parameters from ref. 34 which were obtained by fitting to the anisotropic hole masses at the Γ-point and the electron masses at the Γ-point and the X-point with the properties at the Γ-point and band edges at the X- and L-point being giving the highest weights in the fitting procedure34,38. We examine band edge energies and a function of the lateral size of these energies is fitted to a simple formula that allows the quantization energies in the nanowires to be quickly estimated. In addition, we calculate the wave functions of the band states at the minimum of the conduction band and maximum of the valence band and discuss their spatial distribution propoerties.
Results
Band structures of [001]-oriented GaP nanowires
In this section, the band structures of [001]-oriented GaP nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections of different sizes are calculated and their symmetry properties are investigated. For a [001]-oriented GaP nanowire with a square (rectangular) cross section, the crystallographic structure is symmetric under the operations of the D2d (C2v) point group39,40. At the Γ-point (wave vector k = 0), the band-structure Hamiltonian of the nanowire has the same symmetry as its crystallographic structure. When considering the symmetry of the system at a wavevector away from the Γ-point (k ≠ 0), only the symmetry operations that leave the wavevector k unchanged are allowed41. In the case of a nanowire with a square cross section, the band-structure Hamiltonian of the nanowire is symmetric under the operations of the C2v point group when k ≠ 0. Because of the inclusion of the spin–orbit interaction in the Hamiltonian, the symmetry properties of the electronic structure need to be characterised by the corresponding double point group. The D2d double point group has two doubly degenerate double-valued irreducible representations, Γ6 and Γ7, while the C2v double point group has only one double-valued irreducible representation, Γ5.
Figure 1(a–d) show the band structures of [001]-oriented GaP nanowires with a square cross section with lateral sizes of 11.6 × 11.6 and 23.1 × 23.1 nm2, while Fig. 1(e–h) present the band structures of [001]-oriented GaP nanowires with a rectangular cross section with lateral sizes of 23.1 × 11.6 and 34.7 × 11.6 nm2. The valence bands of GaP nanowires with square cross sections are labelled by the symmetries of their states at the Γ-point in correspondence with the irreducible representations Γ6 and Γ7 of the D2d double point group. All the bands of the GaP nanowires with rectangular cross sections are Γ5-symmetric and doubly degenerate. The band gaps of the GaP nanowires increased as their lateral size decreased because of quantum confinement. However, unlike InAs, InP, InSb and GaSb nanowires whose bulk band gaps are direct and show simple parabolic dispersions around the Γ-point, the lowest conduction bands of the GaP nanowires, whose bulk band gap is indirect, show more complex structures. Figure 1(a,c) show that the conduction bands of the nanowires are dense and two minima appear; one around the Γ-point (k = 0) and the other around k = 0.43π/a. Magnified views of the lowest conduction bands around the two minima are provided in Fig. 2. Figure 2(a,c) indicate that the minimum of the conduction band that is slightly away from the Γ-point is about 1.5 meV bigger than the minimum around k = 0.43π/a. At the Γ-point, the four lowest conduction bands are hardly distinguishable and nearly eight degenerate. When the wave vector moves away from the Γ-point, these bands develop into two nearly degenerate separated groups of four. The next four lowest conduction bands show the same behaviour around the Γ-point. With increasing lateral size of the nanowires, the bands become closer. However, Fig. 2(b) reveals that the four lowest conduction bands around k = 0.43π/a show simple parabolic dispersion relations and the band states all possessed Γ5 symmetries.
The valence bands of the [001]-oriented GaP nanowires also show complex structures. In contrast to other [001]-oriented nanowires such as InAs and InP direct-gap semiconductor nanowires with valence bands with two maxima away from the Γ-point, one maximum of the valence bands of the GaP nanowires is always at the Γ-point and the other maximum of the top valence band is much smaller than that at the Γ-point. When the cross section of a [001]-oriented nanowire is rectangular, the band-structure Hamiltonians of these nanowires are symmetric under the operations of the C2v point group. Thus, all the bands are doubly degenerate and Γ5 symmetric and no band crossings occur in the band structures. Compared with the band structures of nanowires with square cross sections, their conduction bands show similar structures except that the bands are well separated energetically. The valence bands of the nanowires with rectangular cross sections tend to show much simpler dispersions. In particular, the top valence bands of a GaP nanowire with a rectangular cross section become more parabolic around the Γ-point. Figure 1(f,h) show that the top valence bands of a GaP nanowire with a rectangular cross section become more parabolic around the Γ-point with increasing aspect ratio d1/d2 and the other maximum away from the Γ-point disappears.
To provide useful guidance for experimentalists to estimate band edge states, we fitted the edge energies of the lowest conduction band and topmost valence band, Ec(d) and Ev(d), respectively, of the [001]-oriented GaP nanowires using the following expression:
where q1, q2, q3 and q4 are fitting parameters and Eα(∞) = Ec or Ev, which are the band-edge energies of bulk GaP taken from ref. 34. Figure 3 shows the quantum confinement effect on the conduction and valence band states of GaP nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections. The quantum confinement energy of the electrons at the conduction band edge is very strong. For example, the quantum confinement energy of the electrons in the conduction bands of the [001]-oriented GaP nanowire with a square cross section with d ~ 20 nm is only about 0.95 meV. When d is increased to 35 nm, the electron quantisation energy at the conduction band edge is only 0.44 meV. The quantum confinement energies of the holes in the valence bands of the [001]-oriented GaP nanowires are generally larger than the corresponding quantum confinement energies of electrons at the conduction band edge of the nanowires. For example, for nanowires with d ~ 20 nm, the quantum confinement energy of holes is about −5.11 meV and when d~35 nm, the quantum confinement energy of holes is about −1.73 meV, which is still larger than the quantum confinement energy of electrons at 20 nm. Similar quantum confinement properties are also found for the [001]-oriented GaP nanowires with rectangular cross sections. Nevertheless, at the limit of large values of d2, the quantum confinement energies of electrons and holes at the band edges of nanowires with a rectangular cross section approach their respective constant values of q4 listed in Table 1.
Wave functions of [001]-oriented GaP nanowires
Representative wave functions of the band states of [001]-oriented GaP nanowires are presented in Figs 4 and 5. All the band states are doubly degenerate and the wave function of each spin-degenerate state has an identical spatial distribution at the Γ-point (k = 0). However, when k moves away from the Γ-point, the two spin-degenerate states may have different spatial distributions. To calculate the wave function distribution, we separated the doubly degenerate band states with different symmetries using projection operation . This allowed us to obtain the probability distribution on a (001) layer of Ga cations, whose value at each cation site is the sum of the squared amplitudes of all the atomic orbital components of the cation site and all the normalised probability distributions, scaled against its maximum value. As mentioned earlier, the lowest conduction band appears around k = 0.43π/a and the highest valence band is always at the Γ-point (see Fig. 1). Figure 4 depicts the wave functions of the four lowest conduction band states (at k = 0.43π/a) and the four highest valence band states (at k = 0) of [001]-oriented GaP nanowires with a square cross section with d = 11.6 nm. The lowest conduction band states of the [001]-oriented GaP nanowire possess an s-like distribution. The wave functions of the second- and third-lowest conduction band states show probability distributions that have a doughnut shape, which is consistent with the fact that these two band states are nearly degenerate in energy. The fourth conduction band states show four s-like probability distributions at the corners of the square cross sections. As for the four highest valence band states, the first- and third-highest valence band states (at the Γ-point) have similar probability distributions to that of the lowest conduction band of the nanowire (k ~ 0.43π/a). The second-highest valence band states show a probability distribution resembling a doughnut. The fourth valence band states show four-fold symmetric probability distribution patterns and are more localised to the inner region of the nanowire.
Figure 5 presents the wave functions of the four lowest conduction bands (at k ~ 0.43π/a) and four highest valence band states (at the Γ-point) of a [001]-oriented GaP nanowire with a rectangular cross section of 23.1 × 11.6 nm2. The lowest conduction band states in this GaP nanowire show regular probability distribution patterns with one, two and three maxima present, except for the fourth-lowest conduction band state, which displays probability distribution patterns with two maxima along the short side. With increasing d1/d2, the fourth-lowest conduction band states will present a distribution with four maxima. Figure 5 reveals that for the four highest valence band states in the GaP nanowire with a rectangular cross section, the highest valence band state is also s-like. The wave function of the second-highest valence band state retains some doughnut shape and is more elongated. The wave function of the third valence band state has a strong contribution in the center and the fourth resembles the fourth valence band of the square nanowire.
Band structures of [111]-oriented GaP nanowires
In this section, the band structures of [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with hexagonal cross sections of different sizes are calculated and their symmetry properties are investigated. In a [111]-oriented nanowire with a hexagonal cross section, the crystallographic structure is symmetric under the operations of the C3v point group. Again, because of the inclusion of spin–orbit interactions in the Hamiltonian, the symmetry properties of the electronic structure need to be characterised by the corresponding double point group. The C3v double point group has two single-valued irreducible representations, Γ5 and Γ6 and one doubly degenerate double-valued irreducible representation, Γ4.
Figure 6 shows the band structures of [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with hexagonal cross sections with lateral sizes of 11.1 and 22.3 nm. Figure 6(a) reveals that the conduction bands are dense and there are two closed minima in the lowest conduction band at and . The crossing of two groups of bands occurs near the Γ-point; the energies of one group tend to decrease as the wave vector k moves away from the Γ-point and the other group behaves in the opposite manner. At the Γ-point, all the band states are doubly degenerate. For the [111]-oriented nanowire with a lateral size of d = 11.1 nm, the symmetries of the three lowest conduction bands are Γ5 (Γ6), Γ4 and Γ4 with ascending energy. When k moves away from the Γ-point, Γ5 (Γ6) states would split into two single degenerate states, the upper band with Γ5 symmetry and the lower with Γ6 symmetry. The two closed Γ4 bands also separate, thus developing into two groups of three nearly degenerate bands. As the lateral size d increases, the lowest three bands move down because of the weakened quantum confinement. Interestingly, the two lowest conduction bands with Γ4 symmetry move to the bottom of the conduction band. Magnified views of the lowest conduction bands around the two minima are presented in Fig. 7 along with their band state symmetries. Figure 7(a) (d = 11.1 nm) reveals that the lowest conduction bands appear as two closed minima not at the Γ-point and the two minima possess different symmetry properties. The conduction bands around the two minima are nearly triply degenerate and show crossing characteristics. When d increases to 22.3 nm, the conduction bands get denser and the energies of the two lowest minima decrease and get closer. As we mentioned above, Γ4 representation is a double-degenerate double-valued irreducible representations, when they get closer, anti-crossing characteristics appear to avoid exceeding the dimension of Γ4 irreducible representation.
For practical use, we also fitted the edge energies of the lowest conduction band and topmost valence band of the [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with hexagonal cross sections using formula (1). The fitting parameters are listed in Table 1 and the data and the fitting results are presented in Fig. 8. The quantum confinement energy of electrons at the conduction band edge of the [111]-oriented GaP nanowire with a hexagonal cross section of d ~ 20 nm is 1.82 meV. When the d increases to ~35 nm, the quantum confinement energy of electrons decreases to 0.73 meV. The quantum confinement energies of holes in the [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with d ~ 20 and 35 nm are about −5.78 and −2.03 meV, respectively.
Wave functions of [111]-oriented GaP nanowires
We also calculated the wave functions of [111]-oriented GaP nanowires. The representative results are shown in Figs 9 and 10. Here, a wave function is represented by the probability distribution on the (111) plane of Ga cations with the probability at each cation site calculated as the sum of the squared amplitudes of all the atomic orbital components on that site scaled against the maximum value in each graph. These figures present the lowest conduction band states and few highest valence band states. As we mentioned above, at the Γ-point (k = 0), all the band states are doubly degenerate, while when k ≠ 0, the Γ4 bands still are doubly degenerate but Γ5 and Γ6, which are degenerate at the Γ–point, split into two non-degenerate bands. The lowest conduction band of a [111]-oriented GaP nanowire has two closed minima not at the Γ-point. At the Γ-point, only one of the spin-degenerate wave functions is presented because the other one has an identical spatial component. All the spin-degenerate wave functions are presented for cases where the wave vector is not at the Γ-point. Figure 9(a,b) depict the lowest conduction band states at and , respectively, for a [111]-oriented nanowire with a lateral size d = 11.1 nm and Fig. 9(c,d) present the lowest conduction band states of a nanowire with d = 22.3 nm. The state at (a Γ4 state) shows an s-like wave function probability distribution but the superposed states lead to the formation of interference patterns. Another lowest conduction band state at (a Γ6 state) shows a similar distribution and more obvious interference patterns. Similar patterns are observed when d is increased to 22.3 nm (Fig. 9(c,d)).
The highest valence band states are located at the Γ-point. Figure 10(a–d) show the four highest valence band states of [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with a hexagonal cross section of d = 11.1 nm. The first- and fourth-highest valence band states show s-like distributions, while the second- and third-highest valence band states display doughnut distributions. When the lateral size is increased to d = 22.3 nm, the first- and second-highest valence band states show nearly distinct distributions, while the third- and fourth-highest valence band states exchange their distributions while retaining the same symmetric order.
Discussion
We performed a theoretical study of the electronic structures of free-standing zincblende [001]-oriented GaP nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections and [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with hexagonal cross sections by the atomistic sp3s∗ nearest-neighbour tight-binding method considering spin–orbit interactions. The band structures and band-state wave functions of these nanowires were calculated and the symmetry properties of the band states were analysed based on their double point groups. All bands of [001]-oriented nanowires are doubly degenerate and possess D2d symmetry properties at the Γ-point, while the decreased symmetry leads to the bands displaying C2v symmetry properties when k ≠ 0. For the [111]-oriented nanowires, all the bands are doubly degenerate at the Γ-point and some of these bands split into non-degenerate bands when k moves away from the Γ-point as a manifestation of spin splitting caused by spin–orbit interactions. The lower conduction bands of the [001]-oriented nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections displayed two maxima around the Γ-point and simple parabolic dispersion relations around k = 0.43π/a. However, the top valence bands of the [001]-oriented nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections show complex dispersion relations and band anti-crossings and the minima are always at the Γ-point. In the case of [001]-oriented nanowires with a rectangular cross section, the valence bands tend to become more parabolic as the aspect ratio of the cross section is increased. The wave functions of the band states of [001]- and [111]-oriented GaP nanowires are presented as probability distributions on cross sections. The wave functions of the band states in the [001]-oriented nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections are characteristically different. The spatial probability distributions of the band states in the nanowires with a square cross section show interesting structures with characteristics that are more complex than the predictions of simple one-band effective mass theory. Meanwhile, the spatial probability distributions of the band states in the nanowires with rectangular cross sections show characteristics that could be well described by one-band effective mass theory. For the [111]-oriented GaP nanowires with hexagonal cross sections, the conduction band states show interference patterns because of the interactions of the band states. All the highest valence band states show 2π/3-rotation symmetric probability distributions and two degenerate band states at the Γ-point with identical spatial probability distributions. Finally, the effects of quantum confinement on the band structures of the [001]- and [111]-oriented GaP nanowires were examined and an empirical formula to describe the quantisation energies of the lowest conduction band and highest valence band was developed. This formula can be used to simply estimate the enhancement of the band gaps of nanowires of different sizes caused by quantum confinement. We believe that the results presented in this work provide important information about the electronic structures of [001]- and [111]-oriented GaP nanowires and guidance for the use of these nanowires in novel nanoelectronic, optoelectronic and quantum devices.
Method
The nanowires considered in this paper are zincblende crystals oriented along the [001] and [111] crystallographic directions with facets. Because only the translational symmetry along the growth direction is preserved in the nanowire geometry, the period of a unit cell is a in a [001]-oriented nanowire and in a [111]-oriented nanowire, where a = 0.54509 nm is the lattice constant of bulk GaP. For a [001]-oriented nanowire unit cell with a rectangular cross section, the lengths of the two sides are d1 and d2 (for square cross sections d1 = d2). Here, d1 and d2possess discrete values of and, where n1 and n2 are positive integers (for square cross sections n1 = n2). For a unit cell of a [111]-oriented nanowire with a hexagonal cross section, the distance between two parallel sides in the hexagonal cross section is d1 and the distance between two most remote corners is d2. Here, d1 and d2possess discrete values of and , where n is a positive integer. In the present work, without confusion, we take d = d2 to represent the cross sectional size of the [111]-oriented nanowires. In our calculation, the sp3s∗ nearest-neighbour tight-binding formalism was used to determine the electronic structures of the [001]- and [111]-oriented GaP zincblende nanowires considering their spin–orbit interaction. Tight-binding parameters were taken from ref. 34. In the tight-binding formalism, Bloch sums of the form31,42
were used as a basis, where stands for an atomic orbital α at position Rv and N is the number of lattice sites. In the basis of the Bloch sums, the Hamiltonian can be written in a matrix form with matrix elements given by
To eliminate the effects of dangling bonds on the band states near the fundamental band gaps, the dangling bonds at the surface of the nanowires were passivated using hydrogen atoms. The parameters involved in the passivation using hydrogen atoms were determined by the procedure presented in refs 43 and 44. For further details about the calculation methods, please refer to refs 26 and 28.
A unit cell in a nanowire with a large lateral size consists of an extremely large number of atoms and the resulting Hamiltonian matrix becomes too large to be solved by a standard diagonalisation procedure (the largest Hamiltonian matrix in this paper is of the order of 390,000 × 390,000). In this work, the Lanczos algorithm45 was used to solve the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Eq. (3). To separate the doubly degenerate band states, the symmetry properties of the nanowires were exploited to project out the part of given vector belonging to the kth row of the jth representation,
where
and is the kth diagonal element in the jth irreducible representation of the symmetric operation R, lj is the dimensionality of the jth representation and h is the number of symmetric operations in a point group.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Liao, G. et al. Electronic Structures of Free-Standing Nanowires made from Indirect Bandgap Semiconductor Gallium Phosphide. Sci. Rep. 6, 28240; doi: 10.1038/srep28240 (2016).
References
Liu, B. Y., Wei, L. W., Ding, Q. M. & Yao, J. L. Synthesis and optical study of GaP nanowires. Nanotechnology 15, 1745–1748 (2004).
Ohashi, K., McCann, J. & Bockris, J. O. M. Stable photoelectrochemical cells for the splitting of water. Nature 266, 610–611 (1977).
Standing, A. et al. Efficient water reduction with gallium phosphide nanowires. Nat Commun 6, 7824 (2015).
Aghaeipour, M. et al. Optical response of wurtzite and zinc blende GaP nanowire arrays. Opt Express 23, 30177–30187 (2015).
Assali, S. et al. Exploring Crystal Phase Switching in GaP Nanowires. Nano Lett 15, 8062–8069 (2015).
Assali, S. et al. Direct band gap wurtzite gallium phosphide nanowires. Nano Lett 13, 1559–1563 (2013).
Gu, Z. J., Paranthaman, M. P. & Pan, Z. W. Vapor-Phase Synthesis of Gallium Phosphide Nanowires. Crystal Growth & Design 9, 525–527 (2009).
Aparna, A. R., Brahmajirao, V. & Karthikeyan, T. V. Review on Synthesis and Characterization of Gallium Phosphide. Procedia Materials Science 6, 1650–1657 (2014).
Liu, C., Sun, J., Tang, J. & Yang, P. Zn-doped p-type gallium phosphide nanowire photocathodes from a surfactant-free solution synthesis. Nano Lett 12, 5407–5411 (2012).
Novak, J. et al. Electrical properties of individual GaP nanowires doped by zinc. physica status solidi (a) 209, 2505–2509 (2012).
Yazdi, S. et al. Evaluation of Doping in GaP Core-Shell Nanowire pn Junction by Off-Axis Electron Holography. Microsc Microanal 20, 288–289 (2014).
Cahangirov, S. & Ciraci, S. First-principles study of GaAs nanowires. Phys Rev B 79, 165118 (2009).
Ning, F., Tang, L.-M., Zhang, Y. & Chen, K.-Q. First-principles study of quantum confinement and surface effects on the electronic properties of InAs nanowires. J Appl Phys 114, 224304 (2013).
Ning, F., Tang, L.-M., Zhang, Y. & Chen, K.-Q. Remote p-type Doping in GaSb/InAs Core-shell Nanowires. Scientific Reports 5, 10813 (2015).
Ning, F., Wang, D., Tang, L.-M., Zhang, Y. & Chen, K.-Q. The effects of the chemical composition and strain on the electronic properties of GaSb/InAs core-shell nanowires. J Appl Phys 116, 094308 (2014).
Kishore, V. V. R., Partoens, B. & Peeters, F. M. Electronic structure of InAs/GaSb core-shell nanowires. Phys Rev B 86, 165439 (2012).
Lassen, B., Willatzen, M., Melnik, R. & Lew Yan Voon, L. C. Electronic structure of free-standing InP and InAs nanowires. J Mater Res 21, 2927–2935 (2006).
Kishore, V. V. R., Čukarić, N., Partoens, B., Tadić, M. & Peeters, F. M. Hole subbands in freestanding nanowires: six-band versus eight-band k.p modelling. J Phys Condens Matter 24, 135302 (2012).
Wang, L.-W., Kim, J. & Zunger, A. Electronic structures of [110]-faceted self-assembled pyramidal InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B 59, 5678–5687 (1999).
Persson, M. P. & Xu, H. Q. Electronic structure of nanometer-scale GaAs whiskers. Appl Phys Lett 81, 1309 (2002).
Persson, M. P. & Xu, H. Q. Electronic Structure of [100]-Oriented Free-Standing Semiconductor Nanowires. Nano Letters 4, 2409–2414 (2004).
Persson, M. P. & Xu, H. Q. Giant polarization anisotropy in optical transitions of free-standing InP nanowires. Phys Rev B 70, 161310(R) (2004).
Niquet, Y. Electronic and optical properties of InAs/GaAs nanowire superlattices. Phys Rev B 74, 155304 (2006).
Niquet, Y. et al. Electronic structure of semiconductor nanowires. Phys Rev B 73, 165319 (2006).
Persson, M. P. & Xu, H. Q. Electronic structure of [100]-oriented free-standing InAs and InP nanowires with square and rectangular cross sections. Phys Rev B 73, 125346 (2006).
Persson, M. P. & Xu, H. Q. Electronic structure of free-standing GaAs∕AlGaAs nanowire superlattices. Phys Rev B 73 (2006).
Lind, E., Persson, M. P., Niquet, Y.-M. & Wernersson, L.-E. Band Structure Effects on the Scaling Properties of [111] InAs Nanowire MOSFETs. Ieee T Electron Dev 56, 201–205 (2009).
Liao, G. H., Luo, N., Yang, Z. H., Chen, K. Q. & Xu, H. Q. Electronic structures of [001]- and [111]-oriented InSb and GaSb free-standing nanowires. J Appl Phys 118, 094308 (2015).
Liao, G. H., Luo, N., Chen, K.-Q. & Xu, H. Q. Electronic structures of [1 1 1]-oriented free-standing InAs and InP nanowires. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28, 135303 (2016).
Chadi, D. & Cohen, M. L. Tight‐binding calculations of the valence bands of diamond and zincblende crystals. physica status solidi (b) 68, 405–419 (1975).
Vogl, P., Hjalmarson, H. P. & Dow, J. D. A Semi-empirical tight-binding theory of the electronic structure of semiconductors. J Phys Chem Solids 44, 365–378 (1983).
Jancu, J.-M., Scholz, R., Beltram, F. & Bassani, F. Empirical spds* tight-binding calculation for cubic semiconductors: General method and material parameters. Phys Rev B 57, 6493 (1998).
Boykin, T., Klimeck, G. & Oyafuso, F. Valence band effective-mass expressions in the sp3d5s* empirical tight-binding model applied to a Si and Ge parametrization. Phys Rev B 69 (2004).
Klimeck, G., Chris Bowen, R., Boykin, T. B. & Cwik, T. A. sp3s* Tight-binding parameters for transport simulations in compound semiconductors. Superlattice Microst 27, 519–524 (2000).
Madelung, O. In Semiconductors: Group IV Elements and III-V Compounds . Vol. 1 191–100 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991).
Martienssen, W., Warlimont, H. & Warlimont, H. In Springer Handbook of Condensed Matter and Materials Data. 621–638 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005).
Salehzadeh, O., Kavanagh, K. L. & Watkins, S. P. Growth and strain relaxation of GaAs and GaP nanowires with GaSb shells. J Appl Phys 113, 134309 (2013).
Klimeck, G. et al. Si tight-binding parameters from genetic algorithm fitting. Superlattice Microst 27, 77–88 (2000).
Lax, M. Symmetry Principles in Solid State and Molecular Physics. (Dover Publications, 2001).
Tinkham, M. Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics (Dover Publications, 2003).
Yu, P. Y. & Cardona, M. In Fundamentals of semiconductors 4nd edn, Ch. 2, 17–106 (Springer, 2010).
Carlo, A. D. Microscopic theory of nanostructured semiconductor devices: beyond the envelope-function approximation. Semicond Sci Tech 18, R1 (2003).
Xu, H. Q. & Lindefelt, U. Electronic structure of neutral and charged vacancies in GaAs. Phys Rev B 41, 5979–5990 (1990).
Xu, H. Q. Electronic structure of hydrogen-vacancy complexes in crystalline silicon: A theoretical study. Phys Rev B 46, 1403–1422 (1992).
Golub, G. H. & Van Loan, C. F. In Matrix Computations 4 edn, Ch. 10, 545–596 (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grants No. 2012CB932703 and No. 2012CB932700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos 91221202, 91421303, 61321001 and 11274105).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.-Q.C. and H.Q.X. conceived the research. G.L. performed all the calculations, G.L., K.-Q.C. and H.Q.X. wrote the manuscript and G.L. prepared all the figures. All authors reviewed and discussed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, G., Luo, N., Chen, KQ. et al. Electronic Structures of Free-Standing Nanowires made from Indirect Bandgap Semiconductor Gallium Phosphide. Sci Rep 6, 28240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28240
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28240
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Band-inverted gaps in InAs/GaSb and GaSb/InAs core-shell nanowires
Scientific Reports (2016)