Abstract
A geomagnetic observatory named SFEMS is being operated on the deep seafloor in the northwest Pacific since August, 2001. SFEMS is capable of measuring both scalar and vector geomagnetic fields as well as the seafloor instrument’s precise attitudes, which makes it a powerful tool in detecting the so-called oceanic dynamo effect. It was found that SFEMS captured clear magnetic signals generated by the giant tsunamis of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake even for an epicentral distance of larger than 1500 km. Here we report estimates of the focal mechanism of a closer tsunamigenic earthquake in January, 2007 on the seaward slope of the Kuril Trench using tsunami-generated variations in the observed downward magnetic component. Three-dimensional solutions of the tsunami-generated magnetic components were calculated by a new numerical code based on non-uniform thin-sheet approximation and particle motions of seawater using the linear Boussinesq approximation. As a result, a southeast dipping fault alone reproduced the dispersive nature of the downward magnetic component, while any northwest dipping faults could not. This implies that the tsunami-generated electromagnetic fields are useful for determination of focal mechanisms of tsunamigenic earthquakes, since fault dips are one of the most difficult source parameters to estimate even in modern seismology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A large tsunamigenic earthquake occurred along the Kuril-Kamchatka trench in January, 2007 (Table 1). Its teleseismic and tsunami waveform inversions (e.g., ref. 1) have revealed that the focal mechanism was a normal fault type. However, those inversions failed to determine whether the fault dip lied in the northwest or southeast directions. The associated tsunamis were also detected2 by a seafloor geomagnetic observatory operating in the northwest Pacific (Fig. 1). The so-called oceanic dynamo effect was first studied by Faraday3. Since then, study on this phenomenon had been focused in one part on long-period oceanic waves for decades4. The phase velocity of such waves is typically slower than 10 m/s, and thus self-induction of the associated magnetic field is negligible. However, this doesn’t apply to tsunamis with phase velocities faster than 100 m/s and self-induction of the tsunami-generated magnetic fields5 should be taken into consideration as in the case of ocean tides6.
The advent of long-term EM observation on the seafloor7,8,9 enabled detection of the oceanic dynamo effect by tsunamis. As for numerical simulation of the tsunami-generated EM fields, 2-D10,11 and 3-D12 modelling have been proposed. Study on the tsunami-generated EM fields can contribute not only to tsunami early warning systems but also to estimation of both electrical structures beneath the ocean and focal mechanisms. Here we focus on the estimation of the focal mechanism of the East of Kuril Islands Earthquake in January, 2007 using the observed tsunami-generated EM data.
Our SeaFloor ElectroMagnetic Station (SFEMS) installed at a site in the Northwest Pacific Basin (NWP) recorded scalar and vector (black dots in Fig. 2) components of the geomagnetic field every two minutes when the tsunamigenic earthquake occurred. The scalar and vector measurements of the geomagnetic field were conducted by an Overhauser proton precession magnetometer and a three-component fluxgate-type variograph with resolutions of 0.1 nT and 0.01 nT, respectively. SFEMS is also equipped with a fibre optical gyro, a two-component horizontal tilt-meter with a resolution of 0.9 arcsec and a thermometer with a resolution of 0.01 °C for post-retrieval calibration. It was geomagnetically very quiet when the tsunami arrived at the seafloor observatory on January 13, 2007 (Fig. S1 of Supplementary Information) and thus no correction for the external geomagnetic fluctuations was necessary.
We searched for the slip distribution that best explained the observed vector magnetic data. We assumed that the observed field consisted of linear superposition of magnetic fields arising from each sub-fault. Using the dislocation theory for a rectangular fault model, the linear Boussinesq equations (see Eqs (4) through (6) in Methods Section) for tsunami propagation were solved in addition to the Fredholm integral equation of the 2nd kind for EM simulation (Eqs (11) and (12)) based on the non-uniform thin-sheet approximation (Eq. (9)). The amount of slips for each sub-fault was obtained by the non-negative least squares method13. Table 2 shows the slip distributions of Fault Models A and B. As for the locations and geometry of each sub-fault, refer to Fig. S2 and Table S1 in Supplementary Information. Figures 2a through 2d show the comparison of the observed and calculated downward magnetic components, two horizontal magnetic components, and the calculated surface elevation at the location of the EM observatory, respectively. The variances of the model fits for the observed downward magnetic field were 3.89 for Fault Model A and 2.12 for Fault Model B. This indicates that Fault Model B reproduced the downward magnetic component better than Fault Model A. However, the variance ratio was 1.83, which was slightly smaller than the critical F-value of 1.84 corresponding to 95% confidence level, although it passed the 90% F-test. Fault Model B also gives a better fit to the eastward magnetic component than Fault Model A, though the fits to the northward component are marginal.
The major difference between Fault Model A and B is their ability in generating high-frequency magnetic fluctuations after the first arrival of the tsunami, which originally stems from the dispersive nature of the 2007 Kuril tsunami (see Fig. S3). The better fits of Fault Model B predictions to the observed vector magnetic data clearly show that the southeast dipping fault is capable of generating the dispersive tsunami at the site of SFEMS, while the northwest dipping fault is not. However, the limited time resolution of our data (2 minutes) prevents us from further argument on tsunami dispersion. Although Fault Model B predicts high frequency tsunami phases and gives a better fit, the vector magnetic data at the seafloor could not resolve them completely especially for periods 70 minutes after the origin time of the tsunamigenic earthquake. This implies that higher time resolution is necessary for future seafloor EM instruments targeting tsunami studies. The sampling rate should be shorter than 60 s and preferably variable on demand from land stations with ‘satellite’ as well as ‘acoustic’ link to the seafloor14.
It is also noteworthy that the small variations of the northward magnetic component approximately 52 min after the earthquake’s origin time can be interpreted as ‘initial rises10’, which is a necessary result from the counter electric field induced in front of the tsunami due to self-induction within the conductive seawater. The surface elevation of Fault Model B, i.e., the southeast dipping model, explains the observed surface elevation better than Fault Model A at DART 21413 and 21414.
In conclusion, the EM signals generated by the tsunami at the time of the Kuril earthquake on January 13, 2007 were detected successfully by our seafloor geomagnetic observatory with the clear frequency dispersion effect. A new 3-D simulation code for tsunami-generated EM fields in frequency domain was developed, which included not only the inducing non-uniform source fields generated by particle motions of conductive seawater but also self-induction within the ocean and its substrata, in order to determine the fault dip of the source earthquake that emitted the dispersive tsunami. We conducted kinetic and EM simulations based on three previously reported fault models to find none of them compatible with the observed downward magnetic component. The slip distribution on sub-faults was then optimised to yield the best-fit southwest-dipping fault model. This means that the EM observatories like SFEMS can contribute to determine focal mechanisms more precisely than using seismic stations alone.
Methods
Numerical method for tsunami simulation
For kinetic simulation of tsunami propagation, we solved the linear Boussinesq momentum equation by modifying the following finite-difference code: Cornell Multi-grid Coupled Tsunami Model (COMCOT15, Version 1.7). COMCOT originally employed the linear shallow water momentum equation in the spherical coordinate system and uses an explicit leapfrog finite-difference method for its time evolution. The linear shallow water momentum equations can be given as follows;
where η and h denote the sea surface elevation and the still water depth, respectively. (M, N) represent the volume flux, defined by products of velocity and water depth, in the west-east and south-north directions each. (θ, λ) are respectively the latitude and longitude, and R is the mean radius of the Earth while g is the constant gravitational acceleration on the Earth’s surface. f denotes the Coriolis force coefficient and is equal to Ω sin θ with Ω for the rotation rate of the Earth.
The dispersion effect on the tsunami propagation in the deep ocean should be taken into account even for near field tsunamis. We, therefore, modified COMCOT version 1.7 to accommodate the linear Boussinesq momentum equations, which can be written as follows:
The right hand terms of Eqs (4) and (5) are the source of the dispersion effect. The following Poisson’s equation can be obtained from Eqs (1) and (4) through Eq. (6):
The kinetic simulation process can be separated into three steps: We first solved the continuum equation (1) by a leapfrog finite-difference method. Then, we solved the linear shallow water momentum equations (2) and (3) on the lateral boundaries to obtain boundary values of using Eq. (6). We successively solved the Poisson’s equation (7) by an implicit method using LU decomposition. Finally, we solved the linear Boussinesq momentum equations of (4) and (5). An example of prominent dispersion reproduced by the modified COMCOT is given in Fig. S3 of Supplementary Information.
Evaluation of tsunami-generated 3-D EM fields
The induction equation for the magnetic field, b , in the frequency domain is given by;
for a uniform conductivity, σ. Here, ω and μ 0 are the angular frequency and the magnetic permeability in vacuum, respectively while v and F are the velocity of the moving conductor and the ambient magnetic field (| b | ≪ | F |) each.
We used the following non-uniform thin-sheet approximation16 in order to solve Eq. (8) for an angular frequency ω;
where quantities with the superscript * and the subscript H denote non-dimensional and horizontal vectors, respectively. We scaled the magnetic field b in units of vertical component of the geomagnetic main field (), all lengths in units of the skin depth in the first layer beneath the surface (z = 0) thin sheet () and thus the velocity was measured in units of . The electric field E was given in units of and the conductance τ within the thin sheet in units of . The remaining two vectors, r and , are a position vector and a unit vector in the downward direction, respectively. Equation (9) means that the gap in the horizontal magnetic components above (0−) and below (0+) the thin sheet is equal to the net electric current flowing within the thin sheet.
Assuming the substrata beneath the top thin sheet are horizontally stratified and imposing the following boundary conditions at lateral infinities;
the induction equation for the horizontal electric field within the thin sheet is reduced to the following Fredholm integral equation of the 2nd kind;
where K and Lg are the Green’s tensors16,17 and . Using the horizontal electric field within the thin sheet, E * thus derived, the horizontal components of the tsunami-generated magnetic field on the seafloor is given by;
where M is the Green’s tensor and function17 again. The vertical magnetic component can be calculated by taking curl of E *.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Kawashima, I. and Toh, H. Tsunami-generated magnetic fields may constrain focal mechanisms of earthquakes. Sci. Rep. 6, 28603; doi: 10.1038/srep28603 (2016).
Change history
25 August 2016
A correction has been published and is appended to both the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.
References
Fujii, Y. & Satake, K. Tsunami sources of the November 2006 and January 2007 great Kuril earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1559–1571 (2008).
Toh, H. et al. Tsunami signals from the 2006 and 2007 Kuril earthquakes detected at a seafloor geomagnetic observatory. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B02104, 10.1029/2010JB007873 (2011).
Faraday, M. Experimental researches in electricity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 122, 174–177 (1832).
Sanford, T. B. Motionally induced electric and magnetic fields in the sea. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 3476–3492 (1971).
Tyler, R. H. A simple formula for estimating the magnetic fields generated by tsunami flow. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L0960, 10.1029/2005GL022429 (2005).
Tyler, R. H., Maus, S. & Lühr, H. Satellite observations of magnetic fields due to ocean tidal flow. Science 299, 239–241 (2003).
Toh, H. et al. Geomagnetic observatory operates at the seafloor in the northwest Pacific Ocean. Eos Trans. AGU 85, 467–473 (2004).
Toh, H., Hamano, Y. & Ichiki, M. Long-term seafloor geomagnetic station in the northwest Pacific: A possible candidate for a seafloor geomagnetic observatory. Earth Planets Space 58, 697–705 (2006).
Suetsugu, D. et al. TIARES Project-Tomographic investigation by seafloor array experiment for the Society hotspot. Earth Planets Space 64, i–iv (2012).
Minami, T. & Toh, H. Two-dimensional simulations of the tsunami dynamo effect using the finite element method. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4560–4564 (2013).
Minami, T., Toh, H. & Tyler, R. H. Properties of electromagnetic fields generated by tsunami first arrivals: Classification based on the ocean depth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2171–2178 (2015).
Zhang, L. et al. Three-dimensional simulation of the electromagnetic fields induced by the 2011 Tohoku tsunami. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 150–168 (2014).
Lawson, C. L. & Hanson, R. J. Solving Least Squares Problems, Prentice-Hall, Chapter 23, p.161 (1974).
Meinig, C. et al. Technology developments in real-time tsunami measuring, monitoring and forecasting. In Oceans 2005 MTS/IEEE, 19–23 September 2005, Washington, D.C. (2005).
Wang, X. & Liu, P. L.-F. An analysis of 2004 Sumatra earthquake fault plane mechanisms and indian ocean tsunami. J. Hydraulic Res. 44, 147–154 (2006).
McKirdy, D. McA., Weaver, J. T. & Dawson, T. W. Induction in a thin sheet of variable conductance at the surface of a stratified earth–II. Three-dimensional theory. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 80, 177–194 (1985).
Dawson, T. W. & Weaver, J. T. Three-dimensional electromagnetic induction in a non-uniform thin sheet at the surface of a uniformly conducting earth. Geophy. J. R. astr. Soc. 59, 445–462 (1979).
Wessel, P., Smith, W. H. F., Scharroo, R., Luis, J. F. & Wobbe, F. Generic Mapping Tools: Improved version released. EOS Trans. AGU 94, 409–410 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (No. 26282101). Support by Earthquake Research Institute, Univ. Tokyo and Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology at the time of sea experiments was indispensable to complete this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.K. made the analysis of the seafloor EM data, kinetic/EM simulations of the 2007 Kuril Islands tsunami and determination of fault dips based on the tsunami-generated magnetic data. H.T. acquired the original seafloor EM data and helped I.K. complete writing the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kawashima, I., Toh, H. Tsunami-generated magnetic fields may constrain focal mechanisms of earthquakes. Sci Rep 6, 28603 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28603
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28603
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Generalized two-dimensional principal component analysis and two artificial neural network models to detect traveling ionospheric disturbances
Natural Hazards (2022)
-
Tsunami-generated magnetic fields have primary and secondary arrivals like seismic waves
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Motional Induction by Tsunamis and Ocean Tides: 10 Years of Progress
Surveys in Geophysics (2017)