Abstract
Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-associated hemangioblastomas (VHL-HB) arise in the central nervous system (CNS), and are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in VHL disease. Currently, surgical resection is the most effective way to manage symptomatic VHL-HBs. Surgically unresectable VHL-HBs or those in frail patients are challenging problems. Therapies targeting oncologic and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways have failed to demonstrate tumor control. Our experience and previous reports on VHL-HB avidity to somatostatin analogues suggested somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in VHL-HBs, offering an alternative therapeutic strategy. We explored this possibility by demonstrating consistent histologic expression of SSTR1, 2a, 4, and 5 in VHL-HBs. We found that somatostatin analogue octreotide induces apoptosis in VHL-HB stromal cells in a dose-dependent fashion by BAX – caspase-3 pathway unrelated to canonical VHL pathway. When administered to a patient with unresectable symptomatic suprasellar hemangioblastoma, octreotide resulted in tumor volume reduction, symptom stabilization, and tumor cytopenia on repeat 68Ga-DOTA-TATE positron emission tomography (PET) within 6 months, suggesting tumor infarction. We conclude that VHL-HBs harbor multiple SSTR subtypes that offer actionable chemo-therapeutic strategy for management of symptomatic, unresectable tumors by somatostatin analogue therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is an autosomal-dominant tumor disorder affecting 1 in 36,000 live births1 due to mutations in the tumor suppressor VHL gene2. Up to 80% of patients with VHL develop central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas (HBs) in the infratentorial regions, including the cerebellum and spinal cord, due to somatic ‘second hits’ at the VHL locus3,4. Approximately half of the VHL associated HBs (VHL-HBs) will grow over time and lead to mass effect-related neurological symptoms5. Surgical resection of symptomatic VHL-HBs remains the standard-of-care, but even with optimal management VHL-HBs remain a leading cause of death in VHL patients3,4. In some cases, surgical resection of symptomatic VHL-HBs is not an option due to unresectable locations or due to extensive co-morbidities. Development of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy for such patients remains underdeveloped due to the indolent nature of VHL disease6,7,8,9,10. Due to relatively long life expectancy of VHL patients11, treatment with toxic chemotherapeutic agents is not feasible for extended periods of time. Alternative strategies for long term management of unresectable VHL-HBs may arise from observations that VHL-HBs originate from hematopoietic precursors12,13, and that hematopoietic stem cells are known to express somatostatin receptors14.
Our experience with DOTA-TATE positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of VHL patients confirms previous reports of VHL-HB avidity to somatostatin analogues (Fig. 1A–D)15,16,17. However, the therapeutic significance of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression on VHL-HBs remains unknown. Neuroendocrine tumors that express upregulated SSTRs demonstrate a clinical response to somatostatin analogues18,19. In this study, we first demonstrate that VHL-HBs express multiple SSTRs subtypes including 1, 2a, 4, and 5. Then, we demonstrate an increase in apoptosis with SSTR stimulation in human HB stromal cells harvested from surgically resected VHL-HBs. We further confirm this novel strategy for management of surgically unresectable symptomatic VHL-HB in a single patient with administration of octreotide for up to 9 months.
Results
VHL-associated HBs express SSTR subtypes 1, 2a, 3, 4, and 5
Following optimization, 9 VHL-HBs were stained for SSTR subtypes 1, 2a, 3, 4 and 5, (Fig. 1E and Table 1). VHL-HBs demonstrated strong expression patterns for all receptor subtypes except SSTR3 (Fig. 1F). Specifically, 100% of tumors demonstrated positive SSTR4 expression and 89% of tumors demonstrated positive SSTR1, 2a, and 5 expression while only two tumors had SSTR 3 expression by IHC (Fig. 1G). Co-expression of more than one receptor subtype was seen in all tumors (100%), with all tumors showing positivity for at least 3 SSTR subtypes. Multiple SSTR receptor subtype expression may predict clinical response20. Additionally, both SSTR dependent imaging modalities (e.g. DOTA-TATE PET)21 and somatostatin analogues (e.g. octreotide)22 tend to be selective for SSTR subtype 2a. IHC results from additional tumors stained for <5 SSTR subtypes (n = 27), due to insufficient tissue, are available as Supplementary Table 1.
VHL-HB cell viability is decreased with Octreotide exposure
To determine the sensitivity of VHL-HB stromal cells to Octreotide in-vitro, XTT cell viability assay was performed. Stromal cells from four surgically resected VHL-HBs were harvested and investigated for cell survival. We performed flow cytometry to confirm the presence of viable HB stromal cells in our experimental substrates. HB stromal cells were gated for marker carbonic anhydrase-IX (CA-IX)23, and cC3/cPARP positive cells were marked as apoptotic cells. We found satisfactory proportions of viable HB stromal cells (CA-IX positive, cC3/cPARP negative) cells with the harvesting procedure (60 ± 16%) (Supplementary Figure 1). Four different VHL-HB tumors were harvested into a stromal cell suspension and subsequently incubated for 48 hrs in 0, 0.5, 1, 4 and 8 μg/ml of octreotide-acetate (Fig. 2A). XTT cell viability analysis was conducted. All concentrations of octreotide uniformly induced a reduction in cell survival. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μg/ml there was a 59%, 50%, 49%, 58% and 76% statistically significant reduction in cell viability, respectively (one way ANOVA p = 0.0004) (Fig. 2B). These doses are considered consistent with serum-attainable concentrations in patients24.
Canonical VHL pathway is not involved in somatostatin analogue mediated anti-tumor effect
To investigate the effects of octreotide on the canonical VHL pathway (pVHL- HIF – hypoxia pathway) for tumorigenesis25,26, we incubated VHL-HB stromal cells and VHL deficient (VHL −/−) 786-O cells27 with 4 μg/ml of octreotide for 48 hours, and assessed HIF pathway suppression by RT-qPCR25,26,27. In the VHL-HB stromal cells and 786-O cells, octreotide did not significantly suppress expression of genes endothelin-1 (EDN1), erythropoietin (EPO), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) implicated in the canonical VHL pathway (Fig. 2C). Similarly, in 786-O cells no change in EPO, GLUT1, EDN1, or VEGF expression (Fig. 2D). These findings suggest a mechanism other than the canonical VHL pathway leading to reduced VHL-HB cell survival with Octreotide exposure.
Octreotide induces apoptosis in VHL-HB stromal cells
We investigated the BAX/Bcl-2 pathway as a mechanism of octreotide-induced apoptosis in VHL-HB stromal cells. In various types of malignancies such as breast and hepatocellular cancer, somatostatin has been noted for its induction of apoptosis through the direct pro-apoptotic factor BAX28,29. Further, increased BAX/Bcl-2 ratio has been shown in response to SSTR2 mediated apoptosis in pancreatic cancer30. Therefore, we conducted RT-qPCR in order to assess relative mRNA expression of pro-apoptotic marker BAX and anti-apoptotic regulator Bcl-2 (Fig. 2E,F). VHL-HB stromal cells were exposed to octreotide at 0, 0.5, 1, 4 μg/ml for 48 hrs. Compared to controls, the BAX/Bcl-2 mRNA levels exhibited a dose-dependent increase in expression (Fig. 2F). In accordance with previously described mechanisms of somatostatin-induced apoptosis, at 4 μg/ml of octreotide a statistically significant increase in the BAX/Bcl-2 ratio was found (4.144 ± 0.07914, p = 0.02, CI −4.58 to −1.70; one-way ANOVA, MD ± SE, p, 95% CI of difference).
VHL patient treated with Octreotide for surgically unresectable HB
A 64-year-old female with a germline VHL missense mutation (R167W), a known large suprasellar hemangioblastoma, and history of right eye enucleation presented with worsening vision of her remaining left eye. The patient had a past history of severe VHL disease with bilateral clear cell renal cell carcinomas, bilateral pheochromocytomas, pancreatic cysts, retinal HBs, and multiple CNS HBs. Neurological exam was significant for Romberg sign and mild dysmetria of bilateral upper extremities. Left eye extraocular movements and pupillary reaction intact. A visual field test of the left eye revealed new onset inferior temporal quadrantanopsia. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a slowly growing (3.45 cm3) suprasellar hemangioblastoma within the circle of Willis with increased optic tract edema and compression of the optic chiasm (Fig. 3A).
The newly symptomatic suprasellar mass was deemed inoperable due to the location (suprasellar, within the circle of Willis), her extensive co-morbidities, and the risk of loss of vision in her remaining eye with an attempted surgical resection. Whole body 68Ga-DOTATATE-PET revealed that the suprasellar mass was avid for DOTATATE (maximum standard uptake value (SUVMax) = 22.6) (Fig. 3B and C). As such, octreotide was initiated off label with a trial dosing of 20 μg daily subcutaneously for two weeks. Following this, she was prescribed long-acting Octreotide-LAR 30 mg by intramuscular injection, once a month, for 9 months. On Octreotide-LAR, she reported diarrhea managed with increased pancrealipase dosing and an increased insulin requirement. Follow up 68Ga-DOTATATE-PET imaging was done 6 months after primary scans and more than one month after her most recent octreotide dose. These images revealed maximum SUVMax of 12.0, compared to the initial SUVMax of 22.6 prior to starting treatment. Moreover, the 6 month follow up scan revealed central tumor photopenia, indicative of necrosis (Fig. 3D). As a reference, the pituitary uptake initially measured 24.9 SUV and 6 months after treatment measured 50.3 SUV. Serial FLAIR MRI images were acquired periodically throughout octreotide treatment and revealed a steady decline in the volume of the suprasellar mass from 3.45 cm3 to 2.54 cm3 with 9 months of Octreotide-LAR therapy (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, visual field analysis remained stable with continuous therapy (Fig. 3F).
Discussion
In this report, we demonstrated that surgically resected VHL-HBs reliably express SSTR subtypes 1, 2a, 4, and 5, with maximal expression of SSTR subtypes 1 and 2a. This is consistent with the expression patterns of SSTR2 in various neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), such as gastrinomas, VIPomas, and glucagonomas31. Unlike what has been shown in sporadic RCC, octreotide treatment in our patient did not result in growth arrest of VHL-associated ccRCC tumors. Additionally, these tumors were not detected on DOTATATE imaging (Supplementary Figure 2) suggesting the lack of SSTR2 on VHL-associated ccRCC and that SSTR2 expression is specific to VHL-HB. SSTR2 expression has implications for both imaging and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Somatostatin radiotracers including DOTATATE have high affinity for SSTR221. SSTR2 expression is also highly correlated with disease response (tumor volume and hormone secretion) in pituitary32,33 and other tumors22 following somatostatin analogue therapy. SSTR3 and SSTR4 are normally found throughout the brain34,35 but are less widely expressed in human cancers when compared with SSTR1, 2, and 536,37. This is consistent with our findings in VHL-HB (Fig. 1E–G, and Table 1). The anti-proliferative effects of somatostatin analogues such as octreotide have been attributed to the presence of SSTR2 and SSTR5, the SSTR2/5 ratio specifically32,38. Additionally, broader SSTR subtype expression patterns have been found for various types of tumors. For example, SSTR3, 2 and 5 are frequently present on nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, while only SSTR2 and 5 are present on GH-secreting pituitary adenomas37.
Stromal cells live-cultured from surgically resected VHL- HBs demonstrated decreased survival in response to treatment with escalating doses of the somatostatin-analogue octreotide. Analogous findings of decreased cell viability have been shown with the use of octreotide and pasireotide in various types of pituitary tumors, regardless of SSTR subtype expression pattern, in vitro39. The findings of the present study suggest this may be mediated by SSTR-induced upregulation of the direct pro-apoptotic factor BAX. Similar findings have been demonstrated in pituitary and breast cancer cells29,40 possibly mediated by the phosphatase SHP-1 working in a p53-independent mechanism41. Further, upregulation of SSTR2 in pancreatic tumors has been associated with a direct increase of BAX expression, relative to bcl-2, mediating cellular apoptosis30. Consistently, 9 months of octreotide treatment in our patient led to central photopenia on DOTATATE imaging, suggesting tumor necrosis42,43. In this study, we also demonstrate that the canonical VHL pathway25,26,27 is not affected by SSTR activation. This suggests that agents targeting the canonical VHL pathway that have shown partial efficacy8,10 may potentiate SSTR agonist therapy, and may be reserved for instances of tachyphylaxis with somatostatin analogues15,44,45.
Patients with VHL disease currently have an average life expectancy of 59.4 years for men and 48.4 years for women11. Despite surgical advances, VHL-HBs remain a major source of mortality in this patient population4. Symptomatic VHL-HBs are sometimes deemed inoperable due to anatomical location or multiple comorbidities10. Systemic salvage therapy with anti VEGF and anti-angiogenic chemotherapeutic options, such as bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors or and thalidomide has been reported anecdocaly10. Although useful in limited clinical use, these chemotherapeutic agents are not ideal for long-term therapy – a necessity for VHL patients. Somatostatin analogues have been successfully used for treatment of both primary and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and are well tolerated for extended use18,19,46. For indolent NETs, somatostatin analogues are capable of inhibiting the secretory function as well as growth characteristics36. Caplin et al. and Rinke et al. conducted randomized clinical trials of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and showed that somatostatin analogues significantly prolong progression free survival and stabilize tumor volumes19,47. Somatostatin analogues like octreotide have also been studied in various other cancers known to express SSTRs, such as breast, prostate, gastrointestinal, and even CNS tumors such as glioblastoma and meningioma36. Taken together, these results suggest that somatostatin analogues may provide a long-term treatment option for the management of indolent, unresectable VHL-HBs.
The increasing life span of patients with VHL and our greater understanding of the morbidity of their repeated craniotomies for intra-axial HBs has necessitated an exploration of alternative treatment strategies5. Specifically, the thousands of patients with VHL studied at the NIH in a natural history protocol for CNS tumors has allowed for an understanding of the potential catastrophe of these tumors, particularly in their infrequent occurrence in surgically unrespectable locations4. The somatostatin-receptor expression of HBs has been theorized in the past, in particular due to the SSTR expression of VHL-null RCC and case reports of VHLs with DOTATATE-PET signal16,17. However, the reliable demonstration of SSTR expression in HBs, in addition to the clear treatment utility, raises interesting questions about a potential neuroendocrine origin of HBs. Regardless, this finding of SSTR expression and potential anti-tumor efficacy merits expansion into a clinical trial and holds the potential for altering the way we manage this debilitating disease.
Our data from off-label use of Octreotide-LAR in a 64-year-old female patient with a severe VHL phenotype showed that 9 months of octreotide treatment led to resultant clinical stability and decreased tumor volume. Although further investigation is necessary to elucidate octreotide’s mechanism of action in HBs, these results are clinically promising and warrant clinical evaluation.
Materials and Methods
Clinical treatment and tissue sample collection
VHL-HB samples were obtained under protocols NIH #03-N-0164, NCT00060541 (Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health) from subjects undergoing clinically indicated surgical resection of symptomatic tumors4. All samples and methods used for this study were done so in accordance with aforementioned approved guidelines and with NIH ethical guidelines. Subjects gave informed consent for use of their tissue for research purposes and possible publication. Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient in this study and a copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal. The treatment of a single patient with octreotide was initiated with off-label indication of FDA-approved formulations of Octreotide48.
Hemangioblastoma Stromal Cell Extraction
Extraction of stromal cells from VHL-HBs was adapted from Park et al. 2007. Briefly, sterile resected surgical specimens were harvested from VHL-HBs and were immediately submerged in warm media (1:1 Advanced MEM (Gibco, MA, USA): RPMI (Gibco. MA, USA) with 15% Horse Serum (Gibco USA), 5% Heat-inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (Gibco USA), L-Glutamine (Gibco USA), Penicillin Streptomycin (Gibco USA). All methods henceforth performed in sterile conditions. Specimen washed 2x with Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS; Corning) and single-cell suspensions were established by mechanical disaggregation, manual trituration and enzymatic digestion utilizing Papain (Lyophyilzed, 15 U/mg activity, LS003119, Worthington Biochem, Lakewood, NJ) and DNase I (1 U/ul, D4263, Sigma USA) following manufacturer’s protocol. The cellular layer was isolated from contaminating red blood cells and cellular debris with lymphocyte separation medium (Corning) and density-gradient centrifugation. Cells were then washed 2x with HBSS, resuspended in media with the addition of 100 Units/ml of epoetin alpha (EPO) (2000 U/ml Amgen) and plated in tissue culture nonpyrogenic polystyrene treated plates (Corning).
VHL-HB Primary Cell Culture
Cells were incubated at 37 °C and utilized for experimental procedures within 24 hours of harvest. Media: 1:1 AMEM:RPMI with 15% Horse Serum, 5% Fetal Bovine Serum, L-Glutamine, Penicillin Streptomycin, and 100 u/ml EPO if to be used for cell viability analysis.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for SSTRs 1, 2a, 3, 4, and 5 was performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) HBs from 18 different VHL patients. Banked normal cortex was used as control. IHC staining was performed on Leica Bond Max automated stainer. Antibodies used were anti-Somatostatin Receptor 1 (SSTR1) (1:125, LS-C332380, Lifespan Bio, Seattle, WA), anti-Somatostatin Receptor 2a (SSTR2a) (1:500, PA3-109, Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL), anti-Somatostatin Receptor 3 (SSTR3) (1:100, TA323276, Origene, Rockville, MD), anti-Somatostatin Receptor 4 (SSTR4) (1:500, GTX70677, Genetex, Irvine, CA) anti-Somatostatin Receptor 5 (1:50, ab109495, Abcam, Cambridge, MA).
The slides were interpreted independently by two blinded neuro-pathologists. Receptor expression was classified on a graded 5-point scale: negative to strongly positive (−, +/−, +, ++, +++) taking both staining intensity and percentage of positive cells into consideration as described here: expression considered negative (−) if no visible stain was present throughout entire specimen; positive-negative (+/−) if specimen demonstrated a weakly positive staining intensity in 30–50% of cells; positive (+) if specimen demonstrated a weakly positive staining intensity in 80–100% of cells; double positive (++) if specimen demonstrated a moderately positive staining intensity in 80–100% of cells; triple positive (+++) if specimen demonstrated a strongly positive staining in 80–100% of cells. For instances where an agreement was not achieved, a combined blinded review was performed to achieve a consensus grading.
XTT Cell Viability Assay
Following extraction, VHL-HB stromal cells were seeded at approximately 1 × 104 cells/well in a 96-well flat bottom microtiter plate. To evaluate the effects of octreotide on cell viability, cells were exposed to octreotide acetate (0–8 μg/ml. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, Schaumburg, IL) for 48 hours at 37 °C. At the end of the incubation period, XTT cell proliferation assay (ATCC Manassas, VA) were performed per manufacturer’s instructions, and read on an ELx800 Absorbance reader (BioTek Instruments, USA).
RNA extraction and Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA). RT-PCR was performed using CFX384 Real Time System (Bio-Rad, USA) and SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems Foster City, CA). Gene expression was then measured with CFX384 Real Time System (Bio-Rad, USA) with primer sets for endothelin-1 (EDN1, Catalog #QT00088235, Qiagen, USA), erythropoietin (EPO, forward: 5′-GCT GCA TGT GGA TAA AGC CCG-3′; reverse: 5′-CAC ACC TGG TCA TCT GTC CC-3′) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1, Catalog #QT00068957 Qiagen, USA), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, Catalog #QT01682072 Qiagen, USA), Bax forward: 5′-GTT TCA TCC AGG ATC GAG CAG-3′; reverse: 5′-CAT CTT CTT CCA GAT GGT GA-3′ and (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and Bcl2 forward: 5′-CCT GTG GAT GAC TGA GTA CC-3′; reverse: 5′-GAG ACA GCC AGG AGA AAT CA-3′ (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) with β-Actin as internal control (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems Foster City, CA).
Apoptosis Assay
VHL-HB stromal cells were plated in 100-mm dishes at about 5 × 105 seeding density. Cells were then exposed to octreotide acetate at 1 or 4 μg/ml for 48 hours prior to being trypsinized, fixed in 4% formaldehyde, and permeabilized with 100% ice-cold methanol. For apoptosis assay, after fixation and permeabilization, cells were incubated with mixed anti-cleaved Caspase-3 (cC3) at 1:6400 (9664 S Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA) and anti-cleaved PARP (cPARP) at 1:800 (5625 S Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA) for one hour then stained with species-specific secondary antibody for 30 minutes. Lastly, cells were incubated in DAPI (1 μg/ml) and then analyzed by flow cytometry (MoFlo Astrios cell sorter with Summit acquisition software, Beckman Coulter Pasadena, CA). Data analysis was completed with Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter Pasadena, CA).
VHL-HB tumor volume
The authors utilized OsiriX (v4.1.2)49 for serial tumor volume measurements by manual region-of-interest (ROI) assignment for tumor area on individual adjacent image slices. These ROI areas were then multiplied by slice thickness, and total number of slices with ROI added to obtain tumor volume. The patient developed mild renal failure during the study, due to continued growth of renal cell tumors, precluding gadolinium contrast administration. Tumor volumes were measured on volumetric non-contrast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (TE/TR: 335/8000 milliseconds).
Statistical Analysis
In vitro studies were subject to a minimum of three independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., www.graphpad.com). One way ANOVA was used for comparing results of qrtPCR. Dunnett test was used to test the differences with multiple comparisons between groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significance.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Sizdahkhani, S. et al. Somatostatin receptor expression on von Hippel-Lindau-associated hemangioblastomas offers novel therapeutic target. Sci. Rep. 7, 40822; doi: 10.1038/srep40822 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Maddock, I. R. et al. A genetic register for von Hippel-Lindau disease. J. Med. Genet. 33, 120–127 (1996).
Latif, F. et al. Identification of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science 260, 1317–1320 (1993).
Chittiboina, P. & Lonser, R. R. Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 132, 139–56 (2015).
Lonser, R. R. et al. Prospective natural history study of central nervous system hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease. J. Neurosurg. 120, 1055–62 (2014).
Wind, J. J. & Lonser, R. R. Management of von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated CNS lesions. Expert Rev. Neurother. 11, 1433–41 (2011).
Sardi, I. et al. Monotherapy with thalidomide for treatment of spinal cord hemangioblastomas in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 53, 464–7 (2009).
Rogers, L. R. et al. Erlotinib therapy for central nervous system hemangioblastomatosis associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease: A case report. J. Neurooncol. 101, 307–310 (2011).
Omar, A. I. Bevacizumab for the treatment of surgically unresectable cervical cord hemangioblastoma: a case report. J. Med. Case Rep 6, 238 (2012).
Aiello, L. P., George, D. J. & Cahill, M. T. Rapid and Durable Recovery of Visual Function in a Patient with von Hippel- Lindau Syndrome after Systemic Therapy with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor SU5416. 1745–1751 (2002).
Capitanio, J. F., Mazza, E., Motta, M., Mortini, P. & Reni, M. Mechanisms, indications and results of salvage systemic therapy for sporadic and von Hippel-Lindau related hemangioblastomas of the central nervous system. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 86, 69–84 (2013).
Wilding, A. et al. Life expectancy in hereditary cancer predisposing diseases: an observational study. J. Med. Genet. 49, 264–269 (2012).
Shively, S. B. et al. Protracted haemangioblastic proliferation and differentiation in von Hippel-Lindau disease. J. Pathol. 216, 514–20 (2008).
Park, D. M. et al. von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated hemangioblastomas are derived from embryologic multipotent cells. PLoS Med. 4, e60 (2007).
Oomen, S. P. M. A. et al. Somatostatin is a selective chemoattractant for primitive (CD34(+)) hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp. Hematol. 30, 116–25 (2002).
De Martino, M. C., Hofland, L. J. & Lamberts, S. W. J. Somatostatin and somatostatin receptors: from basic concepts to clinical applications. Progress in brain research 182, (Elsevier B.V., 2010).
Oh, J.-R. et al. Ga-68 Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT in von Hippel-Lindau Disease. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging (2010). 46, 129–33 (2012).
Sharma, P., Dhull, V. S., Bal, C., Malhotra, A. & Kumar, R. Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome: demonstration of entire disease spectrum with (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT. Korean J. Radiol. 15, 169–72 (2014).
Cives, M. & Strosberg, J. The Expanding Role of Somatostatin Analogs in Gastroenteropancreatic and Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors. Drugs 847–858, doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0397-7 (2015).
Caplin, M. E. et al. Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 224–33 (2014).
Weckbecker, G. et al. Opportunities in somatostatin research: biological, chemical and therapeutic aspects. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 999–1017 (2003).
Reubi, J. C. et al. Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 273–282 (2000).
Fisher, W. E. et al. Expression of the somatostatin receptor subtype-2 gene predicts response of human pancreatic cancer to octreotide. Surgery 120, 234–40–1 (1996).
Schaller, T. et al. Specific immunohistochemical pattern of carbonic anhydrase IX is helpful for the diagnosis of CNS hemangioblastoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 211, 513–520 (2015).
Chanson, P., Timsit, J. & Harris, A. G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of octreotide. Therapeutic applications in patients with pituitary tumours. Clin. Pharmacokinet 25, 375–91 (1993).
Cockman, M. E. et al. Hypoxia inducible factor-alpha binding and ubiquitylation by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 25733–41 (2000).
Maxwell, P. H. et al. The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 399, 271–275 (1999).
Iliopoulos, O., Kibel, A., Gray, S. & Kaelin, W. G. Tumour suppression by the human von Hippel-Lindau gene product. Nat. Med. 1, 822–6 (1995).
Suzuki, K. et al. Drug-induced apoptosis and p53, BCL-2 and BAX expression in breast cancer tissues in vivo and in fibroblast cells in vitro . Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 323–331 (1999).
Liu, H., Huo, L. & Wang, L. Octreotide inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 25, 1380–1386 (2004).
Manoj, K., Liu, Z. R., Tian, R. & Qin, R. Y. [Mechanisms of inhibition of growth of human pancreatic carcinoma implanted in nude mice by somatostatin receptor subtype 2]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 84, 760–765 (2004).
Reubi, J. C. & Waser, B. Concomitant expression of several peptide receptors in neuroendocrine tumours: molecular basis for in vivo multireceptor tumour targeting. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 30, 781–793 (2003).
Taboada, G. F. et al. Quantitative analysis of somatostatin receptor subtypes (1-5) gene expression levels in somatotropinomas and correlation to in vivo hormonal and tumor volume responses to treatment with octreotide LAR. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 158, 295–303 (2008).
Casarini, A. P. M. et al. Acromegaly: Correlation between expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes and response to octreotide-lar treatment. Pituitary 12, 297–303 (2009).
Schreff, M. et al. Distribution, targeting, and internalization of the sst4 somatostatin receptor in rat brain. J. Neurosci. 20, 3785–97 (2000).
Selmer, I., Schindler, M., Allen, J. P., Humphrey, P. P. & Emson, P. C. Advances in understanding neuronal somatostatin receptors. Regul. Pept. 90, 1–18 (2000).
Barbieri, F. et al. Peptide receptor targeting in cancer: the somatostatin paradigm. Int. J. Pept. 2013, 926295 (2013).
Hofland, L. J. Responsiveness to somatostatin analog treatment and potentials of novel somatostatin analog. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 26, 8–13 (2003).
Barbieri, F. et al. Differential efficacy of SSTR1, -2, and -5 agonists in the inhibition of C6 glioma growth in nude mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 297, E1078–88 (2009).
Ibáñez-Costa, A. et al. Octreotide and pasireotide (dis)similarly inhibit pituitary tumor cells in vitro . J. Endocrinol. 231, 135–145 (2016).
Srikant, C. B. Cell cycle dependent induction of apoptosis by somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 in AtT-20 mouse pituitary cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 209, 400–6 (1995).
Teijeiro, R. et al. Cellular Physiology Biochemistry and Biochemistr y Activation of Human Somatostatin Receptor 2 Promotes Apoptosis Through a Mechanism that is Independent from Induction of p53. Identity 31–38 (2002).
Basu, S. & Abhyankar, A. The Use of 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor with Atypical and Extensive Metastasis Responding Dramatically to a Single Fraction of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 42, 296–298 (2014).
Vural, G. et al. Comparison of indium-111 octreotide and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients mammographically suspected of having breast cancer: Preliminary results. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24, 312–315 (1997).
Susini, C. & Buscail, L. Rationale for the use of somatostatin analogs as antitumor agents. Ann. Oncol. 17, 1733–42 (2006).
Hofland, L. J. & Lamberts, S. W. J. The pathophysiological consequences of somatostatin receptor internalization and resistance. Endocr. Rev. 24, 28–47 (2003).
Lamberts, S. W. J., de Herder, W. W. & Hofland, L. J. Somatostatin analogs in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Trends Endocrin. Met 13, 451–457 (2002).
Rinke, A. et al. Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors (PROMID): Results on Long Term Survival. Neuroendocrinology, doi: 10.1159/000443612 (2016).
FDA approves marketing of octreotide. Clin. Pharm. 8, 4 (1989).
Ligier, Y., Ratib, O., Logean, M. & Girard, C. Osiris: a medical image-manipulation system. MD. Comput. 11, 212–8 (1994).
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge Dr. Martha Quezado for her assistance with neuropathological analysis. P. Chittiboina received grant ZIA NS003053-09 from the NIH Intramural Research Program at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception or design of the work: P.C. Data collection: S.S., M.J.F., M.G.P., A.K., N.A.E., A.R. Data analysis and interpretation: S.S., M.J.F., A.K., A.R., K.P., M.J.M., D.M., P.C. Drafting the article: S.S. Critical revision of the article: P.C., Z.Z., K.P., A.K., M.J.F., S.S. Final approval of the version to be published: P.C., Z.Z., K.P., M.J.M., D.M., A.R., N.A.E., A.K., M.G.P., M.J.F., S.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Sizdahkhani, S., Feldman, M., Piazza, M. et al. Somatostatin receptor expression on von Hippel-Lindau-associated hemangioblastomas offers novel therapeutic target. Sci Rep 7, 40822 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40822
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40822
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for Screening and Surveillance of Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2023)
-
68Ga-DOTATATE Avid Metastatic Vertebral Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Setting of von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2022)
-
von Hippel-Lindau Disease: an Update
Current Genetic Medicine Reports (2019)
-
Somatostatin receptor expression in non-classical locations – clinical relevance?
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (2018)