Abstract
The four R-spondins (RSPOs) and their three related receptors, LGR4, 5 and 6, have emerged as a major ligand-receptor system with critical roles in development and stem cell survival. However, the exact roles of the RSPO-LGR system in osteogenesis remain largely unknown. In the present study, we showed that RSPO3-shRNA increased the osteogenic potential of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) significantly. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that RSPO3 is a negative regulator of ERK/FGF signalling. We confirmed that inhibition of the ERK1/2 signalling pathway blocked osteogenic differentiation in hASCs, and the increased osteogenic capacity observed after RSPO3 knockdown in hASCs was reversed by inhibition of ERK signalling. Further, silencing of LGR4 inhibited the activity of ERK signalling and osteogenic differentiation of hASCs. Most importantly, we found that loss of LGR4 abrogated RSPO3-regulated osteogenesis and RSPO3-induced ERK1/2 signalling inhibition. Collectively, our data show that ERK signalling works downstream of LGR4 and RSPO3 regulates osteoblastic differentiation of hASCs possibly via the LGR4-ERK signalling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) represent a readily available, abundant supply of mesenchymal stem cells, which are capable of self-renewal and differentiation into cells such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes1,2,3. As a potential cell source for bone tissue engineering, hASCs have attracted much attention3,4. To improve the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs effectively in bone tissue engineering, it is crucial to gain a better understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying the differentiation of hASCs. Osteogenesis is defined by a series of events, which starts with a commitment to an osteogenic lineage by mesenchymal stem cells. Subsequently, these cells proliferate, accompanied by an upregulation of osteoblast-specific genes and mineralization3. Multiple signalling pathways, including transforming growth factor β/BMP, Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and Hedgehog, participate in the differentiation of an osteoblast progenitor to a committed osteoblast5,6,7,8,9,10. In particular, FGFs are important molecules that control bone formation. FGFs act by activating FGF receptors (FGFRs) and downstream signalling pathways that control cell differentiation along the osteoblastic lineage. Recent studies revealed that ERK1/2 signalling was induced by FGF2 to promote the proliferation of osteoblast precursors cells11. Additionally, ERK1/2 signalling mediates osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, induced either by FGF1812 or by activation of FGFR2 mutation13. It is well established that FGF promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through the ERK1/2 signalling pathway14.
R-spondins are a group of four highly related secreted proteins (RSPO1–4) with critical roles in development, stem cell survival, organogenesis and oncogenesis15,16,17,18. One of the family members, R-spondin 3 (RSPO3), has an important function in placental development, endothelial and blood differentiation, and malformation of head cartilage19. Mammalian RSPO3 contains two furin-like cysteine-rich (FU) domains near the N-terminus, a thrombospondin type I (TSP1) domain in the central region and a positively charged C-terminal region17. Knockdown of rspo3 causes ventral oedema and vascular defects in Xenopus20. Rspo3-null mice suffer from severe vascular defects and are embryonic lethal21. Recently, R-spondins were identified as ligands of the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptors (LGRs), including LGR4, 5 and 614,15,21. RSPO-LGR was demonstrated play critical roles in development and stem cell survival. However, the exact roles of this ligand-receptor system in osteogenesis remain largely unknown.
In the present study, we first identified that RSPO3 is a negative regulator of hASCs osteogenic differentiation. RSPO3 silencing leads to activation of ERK signalling pathway, which is essential for osteoblast differentiation of hASCs. LGR4 positively regulates osteoblast differentiation of hASCs via ERK signalling pathway. Moreover, loss of LGR4 attenuates the enhanced osteogenesis induced by RSPO3 silencing. Together, our findings suggested that RSPO3 functions as a negative regulator of osteogenesis possibly through a LGR4-ERK dependent mechanism.
Results
Downregulation of endogenous RSPO3 increases the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs in vitro
To evaluate the potential role of RSPO3 in the process of osteogenic differentiation, we first investigated the expression of RSPO3 in hASCs after osteogenic induction. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S1A,B, RT-qPCR showed that increased expression of RSPO3 was accompanied by upregulation of the osteogenic marker RUNX2. We next generated a stable cell line with lentiviruses expressing an RSPO3 shRNA. The knockdown efficiency was confirmed by immunofluorescence, western blotting, and RT-qPCR (Fig. 1A–D). In addition, we examined the expressions of RSPO1, 2 and 4 by RT-qPCR after RSPO3 silencing. There was no significant difference between the RSPO3 knockdown cells and cells transfected with a scrambled shRNA (Supplementary Fig. S1C,D). After culturing the hASCs in osteogenic media (OM) for 7 days, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was detected as being increased significantly by RSPO3 knockdown (Fig. 1E,F). Moreover, the extracellular matrix mineralization, as determined by Alizarin Red S staining and quantification, was also augmented in RSPO3 knockdown cells at 2 weeks after osteogenic induction (Fig. 1G,H). To confirm that RSPO3 depletion promoted osteogenic differentiation, we investigated several osteogenic markers in osteogenically-stimulated hASCs. As shown in Fig. 1I–K, in contrast to the control cells, knockdown of RSPO3 resulted in significantly increased mRNA expression levels of RUNX2, ALP and OCN (encoding osteocalcin). Furthermore, we investigated the proliferation levels of the RSPO3-silenced cells. The growth curve revealed that RSPO3 silencing had no effects on the proliferation of hASCs, as determined by a CCK-8 assay (Supplementary Fig. S1E). In addition, the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs could also be blocked with another independent RSPO3 shRNA fragment, but not with a random shRNA, excluding the possibility of off-target effects (Supplementary Fig. S2A–K). Taken together, these data indicated that downregulation of RSPO3 promoted osteogenic differentiation in vitro.
Overexpression of RSPO3 inhibits the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs in vitro
To further confirm the important function of RSPO3 in osteogenesis, the recombinant human RSPO3 protein (rhRSPO3) was used for rescue experiments. At a concentration of 800 ng/ml, rhRSPO3 inhibited the upregulation of ALP activity and mineralization in RSPO3 knockdown cells as well as in Scrsh group cells (Fig. 2A–D). Consistently, treatment with rhRSPO3 resulted in decreased mRNA expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN (Fig. 2E,F). Furthermore, we established RSPO3 overexpression cells by lentivirus transfection in hASCs (Supplementary Fig. S3A-C). After osteogenic differentiation for 7 days, ALP activity was decreased in RSPO3 overexpressing cells (Supplementary Fig. S3D-E), and extracellular matrix mineralization also decreased, as assessed by Alizarin red staining at day 14 (Supplementary Fig. S3F-G). In addition, RT-qPCR analysis revealed that RSPO3 overexpression decreased RUNX2 and OCN mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig. S3H-I). Taken together, these results indicated that RSPO3 inhibited osteogenic differentiation in vitro.
Downregulation of RSPO3 enhances hASC-mediated bone formation in vivo
To verify our in vitro findings, we examine whether RSPO3 affected hASC-mediated bone formation in vivo. As shown in Fig. 3A, haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining showed that RSPO3 knockdown cells formed more bone-like tissues compared with control cells. Quantitative measurements demonstrated that the area of bone formation was increased significantly in hASC/RSPO3sh cells (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Consistent with the observations from H&E staining, the osteogenic differentiation potential was markedly increased for hybrids containing hASCs/RSPO3sh compared with hASCs/Scrsh, as detected by Masson’ trichrome staining (Fig. 3B). Most importantly, we found that the osteogenic marker OCN was highly expressed in RSPO3sh cells, as determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining (Fig. 3C). Taken together, these results indicated that RSPO3sh hASCs could promote bone formation in vivo.
Downregulation of endogenous RSPO3 enhances ERK1/2 signalling pathway in hASCs
To determine the molecular mechanism by which RSPO3 regulates osteogenic differentiation of hASCs, we screened several signalling pathways and key regulators of hASCs differentiation. Interestingly, we found that RSPO3 was responsible for the inhibition of ERK signalling in hASCs. We detected that the level of phosphor-ERK1/2 in RSPO3sh cells was increased significantly, as indicated by western blotting and immunoreactive band quantification (Fig. 4A,B). In contrast, the other MAPK cascades, p38 and JNK, were not affected by knockdown of RSPO3 (Fig. 4C,D). It is well established that FGF promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cell through the ERK1/2 signalling pathway. Therefore, we next examined the expression of FGF pathway genes in RSPO3 knockdown cells. As shown in Fig. 4E,F, we observed increased FGF4 and FGFR2 gene expressions in RSPO3sh hASCs. This suggested that downregulation of endogenous RSPO3 leads to activation of the ERK signalling pathway.
Inhibition of ERK1/2 signalling pathway blocked osteogenic differentiation in hASCs
To further determine the role of ERK1/2 in osteogenic differentiation of hASCs, we first analysed the activity of ERK1/2 after osteogenic differentiation. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S5A,B, the phosphorylation level of ERK1/2 was increased when cells were cultured in osteogenic media. Next, the small interfering RNA (siRNA) was used to knockdown the ERK1/2 in hASCs. Silencing of ERK1/2 expression decreased ERK mRNA and protein levels, whereas a control siRNA had no effect (Fig. 5A and Supplementary Fig. S5C,D). To further confirm the knockdown efficiency of ERK1/2, the expression level of ERK1/2 was evaluated in proliferation medium (PM) at 7 days and 14 days, separately (Supplementary Fig. S5E–J). As shown in Fig. 5B,C, in contrast to the control siRNA, the ERK1/2 siRNA decreased ALP activity. Moreover, the extracellular matrix mineralization, as determined by Alizarin Red S staining and quantification, was also decreased in ERK1/2-silenced cells at 2 weeks after osteogenic induction (Supplementary Fig. S5K,L). In addition, RUNX2 and ALP mRNA levels also decreased significantly in ERK1/2 siRNA cells, as shown in Fig. 5D,E. These data indicated that ERK1/2 was a positive regulator of osteogenesis. To further confirm the role of ERK in the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs, we next investigated the effects of pharmacological inhibition of ERK1/2 by U0126 on osteoblast formation in OM. Upon treatment of hASCs with the ERK1/2 inhibitor U0126, the activity of ERK decreased significantly (Supplementary Fig. S5M-N). As shown in Fig. 5F,G, U0126 blocked the osteogenic capacity of hASCs, as indicated by ALP staining and quantification. Moreover, extracellular matrix mineralization, as determined by Alizarin Red S staining and quantification, was also impaired by U0126 treatment (Fig. 5H,I). Furthermore, U0126 decreased the expressions of RUNX2, ALP, and OCN in hASCs, as determined by RT-qPCR analysis (Fig. 5J–L). And most importantly, we detected that U0126 treatment had no effect on cell proliferation rate, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S5O. Collectively, the above data indicated the importance of ERK signalling in the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs.
RSPO3 regulates osteogenic differentiation in an ERK-dependent manner
In light of the above observations, we hypothesized that inhibition of ERK1/2 signalling would abrogate the increased osteogenic capacity of RSPO3 knockdown hASCs. To verify this hypothesis, two sets of osteogenic differentiation assays in RSPO3sh hASCs were performed either in the presence of U0126 or in the ERK1/2-silenced cells. As shown in Fig. 6A and Supplementary Fig. S6A, ERK1/2 was effectively knocked down in RSPO3-silenced cells, as determined by western blotting. When cells were treated with OM, the increased osteogenic differentiation ability induced by RSPO3 knockdown was effectively reversed in the RSPO3 and ERK1/2 double knockdown cells, which was indicated by ALP staining and quantification (Fig. 6B,C). In addition, the increased expression of RUNX2 and ALP caused by RSPO3 deficiency was also blocked by ERK1/2 silencing (Fig. 6D,E). Next, we treated RSPO3 knockdown cells in the absence or presence of U0126 in OM. As shown in Fig. 6F,G, U0126 decreased ALP activity, as determined by ALP staining and quantification. Additionally, Alizarin Red S staining and quantification was also inhibited in RSPO3 knockdown cells treated with U0126 (Fig. 6H,I). Consistently, the increased expression of RUNX2, ALP and OCN induced by RSPO3 knockdown was blocked in the presence of U0126 (Fig. 6J–L). Taken together, these results suggested RSPO3 regulates osteogenic differentiation in an ERK–dependent manner.
Silencing of LGR4 impaired the osteogenic differentiation potential of hASCs significantly
Previous studies demonstrated that R-spondins are bona fide ligands of the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptors (LGRs), including LGR4, 5 and 615,16,22. To investigate the potential role of LGRs on RSPO3-regulated osteogenesis, we first detected the expression levels of LGR4/5/6 in the hASCs. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S7A,B, compared with LGR4, the expressions of LGR5/6 were almost undetectable in hASCs. In addition, the expression level of LGR4 decreased after osteogenic differentiation (Supplementary Fig. S7C). To determine the role of LGR4 in osteogenic differentiation of hASCs, we first conducted a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown experiment. As shown in Fig. 7A–C, silencing of LGR4 expression decreased the LGR4 mRNA and protein levels. To further confirm the knockdown efficiency of LGR4, we separately examined the LGR4 expression level after culturing for 7 days and 14 days in PM (Supplementary Fig. S7D–I). Next we detected the role of LGR4 in osteogenesis of hASCs. As shown in Fig. 7D–I, silencing of LGR4 significantly decreased the ALP activity (Fig. 7D,E), mineralization deposit (Fig. 7F,G), and mRNA expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN (Fig. 7H,I). In addition, the growth curves revealed that LGR4 silencing had no effect on the proliferation of hASCs (Supplementary Fig. S7J). Most importantly, we found that LGR4 was a positive regulator of ERK signalling: the phosphor-ERK1/2 level in LGR4-silenced cells decreased significantly (Fig. 7J,K).
Loss of LGR4 abrogates RSPO3-regulated osteogenesis and RSPO3-induced ERK1/2 signalling inhibition
We next examined the effect of LGR4 siRNA on the osteogenic differentiation of RSPO3 knockdown cells. As shown in Fig. 8A and Supplementary Fig. S8A, LGR4 was effectively silenced, as determined by western blotting analysis. When cells were treated with OM, the increase in osteogenic differentiation induced by RSPO3 knockdown was effectively reversed in the RSPO3 and LGR4 double knockdown cells, which was indicated by ALP staining and quantification (Fig. 8B,C). Moreover, the extracellular matrix mineralization, as determined by Alizarin Red S staining and quantification, was also impaired in the RSPO3/LGR4 knockdown cells compared with RSPO3-silenced cells (Fig. 8D,E). In addition, the increased expression of RUNX2 caused by RSPO3 deficiency was also blocked by silencing of LGR4 (Fig. 8F). These results suggested that LGR4 is involved in the RSPO3-regulated osteogenic differentiation. To further support this speculation, we next examined whether the knockdown of LGR4 affected ERK signalling. As shown in Fig. 8G,H, western blotting demonstrated that knockdown of LGR4 abrogated the increased level of phosphor-ERK1/2 in RSPO3sh cells. Taken together, these results indicated a novel role for RSPO3-LGR4 in osteogenesis by regulating the ERK signalling pathway.
Discussion
In several genome-wide association studies to identify genes associated with osteoporosis, RSPO3 was demonstrated as a novel loci associated with bone mineral density(BMD) variations23,24,25. The present study demonstrated that RSPO3 plays an important role in osteogenic commitment of hASCs. When cultured in osteogenic medium, we found that RSPO3 deficiency could promote osteogenic differentiation of hASCs significantly, with increased ALP activity, matrix mineralization capacity, and mRNA expression of RUNX2, ALP, and OCN. Previous studies have shown that RSPO1 and RSPO2 could promote osteoblastic differentiation in synergy with Wnt proteins in vitro26,27,28,29. It appears that RSPO3 plays a different role in osteogenesis of hASCs. Investigation of the molecular mechanism suggested novel crosstalk between RSPO3 and the ERK1/2 signalling pathway. ERK1/2, a component of the MAPK signalling pathway, has been associated with cellular survival, proliferation and differentiation30,31. Despite numerous studies, the role of ERK1/2 in osteogenic differentiation is still a matter of some controversy. Administration of the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 has been reported to promote early osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization in BMP2-treated C2C12 and MC3T3-E1 cells32,33. However, conflicting results obtained from other investigations indicated that activation of ERK signalling promotes osteogenic differentiation of stem cells in a cell-type specific manner34,35,36,37,38,39. In this study, we revealed the importance of the ERK pathway in the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs. To clarify the potential role of the ERK1/2, we established ERK1/2 knockdown cells and showed that ERK1/2 deficiency significantly impaired the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs (Fig. 5A–E). Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of ERK1/2 with U0126 also impaired the osteogenesis of hASCs significantly (Fig. 5F–L). This work enriched our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the regulation of hASCs osteogenic differentiation by the ERK signalling pathway. To further clarify whether ERK activation is necessary for increased osteogenic differentiation of RSPO3-silenced hASCs, we blocked the ERK1/2 signalling pathway using U0126 or an siRNA for MAPK1/3. The results showed that the increased osteogenic capability of RSPO3-knockdown hASCs was almost completely abrogated by U0126 treatment or ERK1/2 silencing (Fig. 6F–L). Thus, ERK1/2 signalling is involved in the osteoblast differentiation of hASCs regulated by RSPO3. Despite the importance of ERK signalling in osteogenesis of hASCs, it is not the only pathway that is regulated by RSPO3. Numerous studies suggested that RSPO3 is associated with several important cell signalling and metabolic pathways. Rspo3 deletion blocks Wnt/Ca2+/NFAT signalling by upregulation the expression of Rnf213, Usp18, and Trim30α, thus leading to the vessel regression phenotype of Rspo3-iECKO mice40. Deletion of RSPO3 leads to loss of SHH signalling and impaired organ growth in adrenal glands41. RSPO3 also controls metabolic zonation of liver hepatocytes via beta-catenin signalling42. Perhaps other factors are involved in RSPO3-mediated osteoblast differentiation of hASCs.
Notably, we observed that RSPO3 negatively regulates the ERK signalling. R-spondins were first discovered as secreted Wnt agonists43 and were identified as ligands of three related receptors LGR4–644. LGRs bound with high affinity to the furin domains of R-spondins and then activated Wnt signaling15,16. Interestingly, our data showed that knockdown of RSPO3 increased the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, while LGR4 silencing exhibited opposite effect. LGR4 silencing blocked the increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 induced by RSPO3 knockdown (Fig. 8G,H). LGR4 was identified as a key regulator of bone formation and resorption. Deletion of LGR4 in mice resulted in a dramatic delay in osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. LGR4 regulated bone formation and remodelling through the cAMP-PKA-Atf4 signalling pathway45. Silencing of LGR4 abrogated the osteogenesis in MC3T3-E1 in presence of BMP2 or RSPO246,47. These studies suggested that multiple signalling pathways were involved in LGR4-regulated osteogenesis, not merely ERK signalling. Recently, another two molecules have been validated as the ligands of LGR4. Norrin, a secreted protein, also a known ligand for Fzl4, stimulated Wnt signalling specifically through LGR4 but not LGR5 and 6. Norrin also interacted directly with Fzl4 to promote LRP5/6 internalization and to increase beta-catenin levels. Moreover, Norrin bound to BMP2/4, blocking the activation of type I and II BMP receptors, thus leading to decreasement in downstream Smad activities48. An intriguing and important idea is that the functions of Norrin and RPSO3 are similar: first, disruption of them led to vascular defect20,21,49,50,51; in addition, both RSPO3 and Norrin can bind to LGR4 and act as a Wnt agonist15,16,48. Until recently, studies about Norrin mainly focus on its biomedical effect in retinal vascularization. Considering the important function of Wnt and BMP signalling in osteogenesis, one cannot rule out the possibility that Norrin may be a strong competitor to RSPO3 in regulation of osteogenesis. Further studies are needed to verify the presumption. Additionally, it was also reported that LGR4 acted as a second receptor for RANKL. Luo, J. et al. showed that RANKL-LGR4-Gαq signaling promoted GSK3β activation, leading to NFATc1 nuclear export that downregulate NFATc1 expression and ultimately impairing osteoclastogenesis. Besides, LGR4 also competed with RANK for RANKL binding and attenuated RANK downstream signaling including NFκB pathway, calcium osscilation and AKT pathway. The study also demonstrated that RANKL competed with RSPO1 to interact with LGR4 in HEK293T cells, which prompted us that similar biological process may exist in hASCs52. In the present study, we confirmed that knockdown of LGR4 inhibited the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs. Most importantly, we confirmed that LGR4 was involved in ERK signalling activation. Loss of LGR4 abrogated RSPO3-regulated osteogenesis and RSPO3-induced ERK1/2 signalling inhibition. Although RSPO3 is reported as a ligand of LGR4, it is difficult for us to verify whether RSPO3 regulates ERK signalling directly through LGR4. There is a reasonable speculation that RSPO3 functions via LGR4 in regulating the activity of ERK signalling and osteogenesis, while some other related ligands and signalling pathways participate in this process, making it a complicated regulatory network.
In conclusion, we have shown that the RSPO3-LGR4 system plays an important role in osteogenic differentiation of hASCs. RSPO3 regulates osteogenesis possibly through the LGR4-ERK signalling pathway. This novel function of RSPO3-LGR4 might provide a new scientific rationale for the regulation of osteogenic differentiation of hASCs, and the regulatory control of ERK by RSPO3-LGR4 might extend beyond osteogenesis and have important implications in other cellular processes.
Materials and Methods
All animal work in this study was approved by the Peking University Biomedical Ethics Committee Experimental Animal Ethics Branch, and was in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of the Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, National Institutes of the Health Publication).
Culture of hASCs
Primary hASCs were purchased from ScienCell Research Laboratories (Carlsbad, CA, USA). To induce osteogenic differentiation, hASCs were cultured in OM containing 100 mM/ml ascorbic acid, 2 mM β-glycerophosphate and 10 nM dexamethasone. All experiments were repeated three times using human ASCs from the three donors, respectively.
Viral infection
Viral packaging and infection was prepared as described previously53. Briefly, HEK293T cells at 80% confluency were co-transfected with pLNB vectors with a mutant CBA promoter for gene expression or shRNAs, or plasmids psPAX2 (Addgene) and pVSV-G (Clontech, USA), using the PolyJet™ Transfection Reagent (SignaGen Laboratories, Rockville, MD, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cell culture supernatant was collected at 36, 48 and 60 h after transfection, centrifuged and filtered through an Acrodisc filter with a 0.45-μm PVDF membrane (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY, USA) to remove cellular debris. The viral particles were then precipitated by centrifugation with PEG-it™ (System Biosciences, SBI, Mountain View, CA, USA). The concentrated lentiviral particles were titered, aliquoted and stored at −70 °C until ready for use. The lentivirus titre was 3 × 108 TU/ml. Transfection of the hASCs was performed by exposing them to dilutions of the viral supernatant in the presence of polybrene (5 μg/ml) for 24 h. After 72 h of transfection, puromycin was used to select the stably transfected cells. The shRNA target sequences were: RSPO3sh#1, CCATTCATTCCCTGGCATTAA; RSPO3sh#2, GGCTACCTACAAGGTCAATTA.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining
After 7 days of culture, cells were washed with PBS three times and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature (RT) for 10 min. Subsequently, the cells were washed in PBS three times, incubated with a BCIP/NBT staining kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China) solution for 15 min at RT and rinsed with water.
Quantification of ALP activity
After 7 days of culture, cells from six-well culture plates were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and then treated with 500 μl/well of 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5 min at RT for cell lysis. Cells were collected with a cell scraper, sonicated on ice and then centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at 12000 rpm. The supernatants were used to determine the protein concentration using a BCA protein assay reagent (Prod#23225, Pierce Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and to measure the ALP activity. ALP activity in cell lysates was measured using an ALP assay kit (A059-2, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China) and normalized by the total protein content.
Alizarin Red staining and quantification
Analysis of mineralization was determined by Alizarin Red staining. Cells were induced for 2 weeks, fixed for 30 min in 70% ethanol at 4 °C and then rinsed with Milli-Q water. Calcium deposition was then visualized after incubation with 2% Alizarin Red S pH 4.2. Alizarin Red S was extracted by destaining with hexadecyl pyridinium chloride monohydrate. Mineral accumulation was quantified on a microplate reader at 562 nm and normalized by the total protein concentration detected in a duplicate plate.
Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted with the TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen) and precipitated with ethanol. To exclude potential contamination of DNA, RNA was treated with DNase I for 30 min at 37 °C. cDNA was synthesized from 0.5–2 μg– of RNA with oligo (dT) 18 primers using a Quantscript RT Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China).
RT-qPCR was performed on an Eppendorf Mastercycler ep realplex (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) using the Fast-Start Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Reactions were carried out in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 2 μl of 1:10 diluted template cDNA, 10 μl of 2 × SYBR green PCR Master Mix (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) and 100 nM of each primer. The following amplification program was used in all PCRs: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C. The specificity of each amplified reaction was verified by a dissociation curve (melting curve) analysis after 40 cycles, which was carried out by heating the amplicon from 60 to 95 °C. Moreover, the specificity of the PCR product was further confirmed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Each sample was analysed in triplicate wells, and no-template controls (without cDNA in the PCR) were included. Data were collected and analysed quantitatively using realplex software.
The following forward and reverse primer sequences were used: GAPDH (internal control), (F) AAGGAGTAAGACCCCTGGACCA, (R) GCAACTGTGAGCAGGGGAGATT; RSPO3, (F) TGTCAGTATTGTGCACTGTGAGGT, (R) TCGGACCCGTGTTTCAGTCC; RUNX2, (F) ACTACCAGCCACCGAGACCA, (R) ACTGCTTGCAGCCT-TAAATGACTCT; ALP, (F) TGTGTGGGGTGAAGGCCAAT, (R) TCGTGGTGGTCACAATGCCC; OCN, (F) CACCATGAGAGCCCTCACACTC; (R) CCTGCTTGGACACAAAGGCTGC; MAPK1, (F) CCCATCGCCGAAGCACCATT, (R) TCCTCTGAGCCCTTGTCCTGA; MAPK3, (F) CATGGTCAGCTCGGCCTATGAC, (R) ATCTGGATCTCCCGGAGCGT; FGF4, (F) AGCTCTATGGCTCGCCCTTCT, (R) TCCCATTCTTGCTCAGGGCG; FGFR2, (F) GGTAACAGTTTCGGCTGAGTCCA, (R) TGCCGTTGAAGAGAGGCGTG.
Bone formation in vivo
β-TCP (Bicon, Boston, MA, USA) was used for the in vivo study, according to our previous experiments54. Cells were cultured to 100% confluence in vitro, resuspended and incubated with β-TCP and then transplanted subcutaneously into the dorsa of nude mice. Two transplantation sites were prepared in each mouse, which were transplanted with three groups of cells: hASC/Scrsh, hASC/RSPO3 sh#1, and hASC/RSPO3 sh#2, as described previously. Transplants were harvested at 6 weeks and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After decalcification in 10% EDTA (PH 7.4) for 10 days, the specimens were dehydrated and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Sections (5-mm thickness) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome stain. Osteogenesis was evaluated by IHC analysis for OCN. For quantification of bone-like tissue, 10 images of each sample were taken randomly (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and SPOT 4.0 software (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI, USA) was used to measure the area of new bone formation versus total area.
Small interfering RNA
siRNAs targeting MAPK1, MAPK3 and LGR4 and negative control siRNA (NC-FAM) were obtained from Genepharma. siRNA sequences were: siMAPK1-1, CACCAACCAUCGAGCAAAUTT; siMAPK1-2, GUGCUCUGCUUAUGAUAAUTT; siMAPK1-3, CCACCUGUGAUCUCAAGAUTT; siMAPK3-1, GCUGAACUCCAAGGGCUAUTT; siMAPK3-2, ACACGCAGUUGCAGUACAUTT; siMAPK3-3, GACCGGAUGUUAACCUUUATT; siLGR4-1, GGUUGAAAGAACUCAAAGUTT; siLGR4-2, GAACUCAGCAUUUCACAAUTT; siLGR4-3, CACCUUUCAAGGCCUGAUATT. Cells at 70–80% confluence were transfected with 5 nM of siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAi-MAX (Invitrogen) and cultured for the indicated days. A mixture of siMAPK1-1, siMAPK1-2, siMAPK1-3, siMAPK3-1, siMAPK3-2 and siMAPK3-3 was used for ERK1/2 silencing. siLGR4-1 was used for LGR4si-1 as shown in Figs 7 and 8, Supplementary Fig. S7 and Supplementary Fig. S8. A mixture of siLGR4-2 and siLGR4-3 was used for LGR4si-2 as shown in Fig. 7 and Supplementary Fig. S7. Knockdown efficiency of siRNA was analysed by RT-qPCR and Western blot.
Western blotting
Cells were harvested and then lysed in RIPA lysis buffer with a complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche). Lysates were sonicated and centrifuged at 12000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min to obtain the supernatant. The Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific) was used to measure the protein concentrations. Aliquots (30 μg) of the protein extracts were subjected to 10% SDS PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore). After blocking in 5% skim milk for 1 h, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h, and detection with an ECL kit (CWBIO) to visualize the immunoreactive protein bands. The antibodies used were anti-RSPO3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti ERK1/2, anti phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202), anti SAPK/JNK, anti phospho-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185), anti p38, anti phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA); anti GAPDH, anti LGR4 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
Inhibition of the activation of ERK by U0126
To block the activation of ERK signalling, U0126 (Sigma), a specific inhibitor of ERK activation, was added to the osteogenic differentiation medium for the entire 14-day differentiation period. The inhibiting effect was analysed by western blotting.
Cell proliferation
The cell proliferation was examined with the CCK-8 (Cell Counting Kit-8) assay (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacture’s protocol. At each time point, the supernatant of each group was removed, and cells were incubated in DMEM medium containing CCK-8 for 2 h at 37 °C. Optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (ELX808, BioTek).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad scientific software for Windows (San Diego, CA). Comparisons between two groups were analysed by independent two-tailed Student’s t-tests, and comparisons between more than two groups were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3–10 experiments per group. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Zhang, M. et al. RSPO3-LGR4 regulates osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells via ERK/FGF signaling. Sci. Rep. 7, 42841; doi: 10.1038/srep42841 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Zuk, P. A. et al. Human Adipose Tissue is a Source of Multipotent Stem Cells. Mol Biol Cell. 13, 4279–4295 (2002).
Bianco, P., Robey, P. G. & Simmons, P. J. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Revisiting History, Concepts, and Assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2, 313–319 (2008).
Levi, B. & Longaker, M. T. Concise Review: Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells for Skeletal Regenerative Medicine. Stem Cells. 29, 576–582 (2011).
Gimble, J. M., Katz, A. J. & Bunnell, B. A. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine. Circ Res. 100, 1249–1260 (2007).
Wozney, J. M. et al. Novel Regulators of Bone Formation: Molecular Clones and Activities. Science. 242, 1528–1534 (1988).
Montero, A. et al. Disruption of the Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Gene Results in Decreased Bone Mass and Bone Formation. J Clin Invest. 105, 1085–1093 (2000).
Tu, X. et al. Noncanonical Wnt Signaling through G Protein-Linked Pkcdelta Activation Promotes Bone Formation. Dev Cell. 12, 113–127 (2007).
Mak, K. K. et al. Hedgehog Signaling in Mature Osteoblasts Regulates Bone Formation and Resorption by Controlling Pthrp and Rankl Expression. Dev Cell. 14, 674–688 (2008).
Long, F. Building Strong Bones: Molecular Regulation of the Osteoblast Lineage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 13, 27–38 (2012).
Ramasamy, S. K., Kusumbe, A. P., Wang, L. & Adams, R. H. Endothelial Notch Activity Promotes Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis in Bone. Nature. 507, 376–380 (2014).
Choi, S. C. et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 and -4 Promote the Proliferation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells by the Activation of the Pi3K-Akt and Erk1/2 Signaling Pathways. Stem Cells Dev. 17, 725–736 (2008).
Hamidouche, Z. et al. Autocrine Fibroblast Growth Factor 18 Mediates Dexamethasone-Induced Osteogenic Differentiation of Murine Mesenchymal Stem Cells.. J Cell Physiol. 224, 509–515 (2010).
Miraoui, H. et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation in Mesenchymal Cells Via Erk1/2 and Protein Kinase C Signaling. J Biol Chem. 284, 4897–4904 (2009).
Marie, P. J. & Miraoui, H. & Severe, N. Fgf/Fgfr Signaling in Bone Formation: Progress and Perspectives. Growth Factors. 30, 117–123 (2012).
Carmon, K. S., Gong, X., Lin, Q., Thomas, A. & Liu, Q. R-Spondins Function as Ligands of the Orphan Receptors Lgr4 and Lgr5 to Regulate Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 11452–11457 (2011).
de Lau, W. et al. Lgr5 Homologues Associate with Wnt Receptors and Mediate R-Spondin Signalling. Nature. 476, 293–297 (2011).
de Lau, W. B., Snel, B. & Clevers, H. C. The R-Spondin Protein Family. Genome Biol. 13, 242 (2012).
Yoon, J. K. & Lee, J. S. Cellular Signaling and Biological Functions of R-Spondins. Cell Signal. 24, 369–377 (2012).
Jin, Y. R. & Yoon, J. K. The R-Spondin Family of Proteins: Emerging Regulators of Wnt Signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 44, 2278–2287 (2012).
Kazanskaya, O. et al. The Wnt Signaling Regulator R-Spondin 3 Promotes Angioblast and Vascular Development. Development. 135, 3655–3664 (2008).
Aoki, M. et al. R-Spondin3 is Required for Mouse Placental Development. Dev Biol. 301, 218–226 (2007).
Glinka, A. et al. Lgr4 and Lgr5 are R-Spondin Receptors Mediating Wnt/Beta-Catenin and Wnt/Pcp Signalling. Embo Rep. 12, 1055–1061 (2011).
Duncan, E. L. et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Using Extreme Truncate Selection Identifies Novel Genes Affecting Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk. Plos Genet. 7, e1001372 (2011).
Kemp, J. P. et al. Phenotypic Dissection of Bone Mineral Density Reveals Skeletal Site Specificity and Facilitates the Identification of Novel Loci in the Genetic Regulation of Bone Mass Attainment. Plos Genet. 10, e1004423 (2014).
Styrkarsdottir, U. et al. Sequence Variants in the Ptch1 Gene Associate with Spine Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporotic Fractures. Nat Commun. 7, 10129 (2016).
Lu, W. et al. R-Spondin1 Synergizes with Wnt3a in Inducing Osteoblast Differentiation and Osteoprotegerin Expression. FEBS Lett. 582, 643–650 (2008).
Bell, S. M. et al. R-Spondin 2 is Required for Normal Laryngeal-Tracheal, Lung and Limb Morphogenesis. Development. 135, 1049–1058 (2008).
Friedman, M. S., Oyserman, S. M. & Hankenson, K. D. Wnt11 Promotes Osteoblast Maturation and Mineralization through R-Spondin 2. J Biol Chem. 284, 14117–14125 (2009).
Sharma, A. R. et al. Rspo 1 Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation Via Wnt Signaling Pathway. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 50, 19–25 (2013).
Ramos, J. W. The Regulation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase (Erk) in Mammalian Cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 40, 2707–2719 (2008).
Greenblatt, M. B., Shim, J. H. & Glimcher, L. H. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways in Osteoblasts. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 29, 63–79 (2013).
Higuchi, C. et al. Continuous Inhibition of Mapk Signaling Promotes the Early Osteoblastic Differentiation and Mineralization of the Extracellular Matrix. J Bone Miner Res. 17, 1785–1794 (2002).
Nakayama, K. et al. Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Inhibit Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Smad Responsive Promoter Activity and Differentiation of Murine Mc3T3-E1 Osteoblast-Like Cells. J Bone Miner Res. 18, 827–835 (2003).
Jaiswal, R. K. et al. Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation to the Osteogenic Or Adipogenic Lineage is Regulated by Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase. J Biol Chem. 275, 9645–9652 (2000).
Suzuki, A. et al. Evidence for a Role of P38 Map Kinase in Expression of Alkaline Phosphatase During Osteoblastic Cell Differentiation. Bone. 30, 91–98 (2002).
Schindeler, A. & Little, D. G. Ras-Mapk Signaling in Osteogenic Differentiation: Friend Or Foe? J Bone Miner Res. 21, 1331–1338 (2006).
Liu, Q. et al. The Role of the Extracellular Signal-Related Kinase Signaling Pathway in Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells and in Adipogenic Transition Initiated by Dexamethasone. Tissue Eng Part A. 15, 3487–3497 (2009).
Quarto, N., Senarath-Yapa, K., Renda, A. & Longaker, M. T. Twist1 Silencing Enhances in vitro and in vivo Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells by Triggering Activation of Bmp-Erk/Fgf Signaling and Taz Upregulation. Stem Cells. 33, 833–847 (2015).
Qiao, X. et al. Irisin Promotes Osteoblast Proliferation and Differentiation Via Activating the Map Kinase Signaling Pathways. Sci Rep. 6, 18732 (2016).
Scholz, B. et al. Endothelial Rspo3 Controls Vascular Stability and Pruning through Non-Canonical Wnt/Ca (2+)/Nfat Signaling. Dev Cell. 36, 79–93 (2016).
Vidal, V. et al. The Adrenal Capsule is a Signaling Center Controlling Cell Renewal and Zonation through Rspo3. Genes Dev. 30, 1389–1394 (2016).
Rocha, A. S. et al. The Angiocrine Factor Rspondin3 is a Key Determinant of Liver Zonation. Cell Rep. 13, 1757–1764 (2015).
Kazanskaya, O. et al. R-Spondin2 is a Secreted Activator of Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling and is Required for Xenopus Myogenesis. Dev Cell. 7, 525–534 (2004).
Gong, X. et al. Aberrant Rspo3-Lgr4 Signaling in Keap1-Deficient Lung Adenocarcinomas Promotes Tumor Aggressiveness. Oncogene. 34, 4692–4701 (2015).
Luo, J. et al. Regulation of Bone Formation and Remodeling by G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 48. Development. 136, 2747–2756 (2009).
Pawaputanon, N. M. C. et al. Bmp-2 Enhances Lgr4 Gene Expression in Osteoblastic Cells. J Cell Physiol. 231, 887–895 (2016).
Zhu, C. et al. Lgr4 Acts as a Key Receptor for R-Spondin 2 to Promote Osteogenesis through Wnt Signaling Pathway. Cell Signal. 28, 989–1000 (2016).
Deng, C. et al. Multi-Functional Norrin is a Ligand for the Lgr4 Receptor. J Cell Sci. 126, 2060–2068 (2013).
Richter, M. et al. Retinal Vasculature Changes in Norrie Disease Mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 39, 2450–2457 (1998).
Kato, M. et al. Cbfa1-Independent Decrease in Osteoblast Proliferation, Osteopenia, and Persistent Embryonic Eye Vascularization in Mice Deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt Coreceptor. J Cell Biol. 157, 303–314 (2002).
Ye, X., Wang, Y. & Nathans, J. The Norrin/Frizzled4 Signaling Pathway in Retinal Vascular Development and Disease. Trends Mol Med. 16, 417–425 (2010).
Luo, J. et al. Lgr4 is a Receptor for Rankl and Negatively Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Bone Resorption. Nat Med. 22, 539–546 (2016).
Zhang, P. et al. Histone Acetyltransferase Gcn5 Regulates Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Inhibiting Nf-Kappab. J Bone Miner Res. 31, 391–402 (2016).
Liu, Y. et al. Flow Cytometric Cell Sorting and in vitro Pre-Osteoinduction are Not Requirements for in vivo Bone Formation by Human Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells. Plos One. 8, e56002 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 81570953, 81500822], the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University from Ministry of Education [grant number NCET-11-0026], the School of Stomatology, Pekying University for Talented Young Investigators [grant number PKUSS20140109], and the Construction Program for National Key Clinical Specialty from National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.Z.: conception and design, collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing; P.Z.: conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing; Y.L., L.L., X.Z., and, H.L.: collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation; Y.Z.: conception and design, financial support, manuscript writing, and final approval of manuscript; M.Z. and P.Z. contributed equally to this article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, M., Zhang, P., Liu, Y. et al. RSPO3-LGR4 Regulates Osteogenic Differentiation Of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Via ERK/FGF Signalling. Sci Rep 7, 42841 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42841
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42841
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Endothelial cell-derived RSPO3 activates Gαi1/3-Erk signaling and protects neurons from ischemia/reperfusion injury
Cell Death & Disease (2023)
-
A NOTCH1/LSD1/BMP2 co-regulatory network mediated by miR-137 negatively regulates osteogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2021)
-
Rspo2 inhibits TCF3 phosphorylation to antagonize Wnt signaling during vertebrate anteroposterior axis specification
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Synergistic roles of Wnt modulators R-spondin2 and R-spondin3 in craniofacial morphogenesis and dental development
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
RSPO3 is important for trabecular bone and fracture risk in mice and humans
Nature Communications (2021)