Abstract
Unlike vagile organisms, plants perform a wide range of phenotypic responses to cope with environmental stresses. A special case of interaction with external factors is the ability of plants to recognize genetic relatedness of neighbour plants, actually well known as kin recognition. The present work aimed to provide a valuable contribution to the field of kin recognition in plants through a common garden experiment. To avoid bias involved in pot experiments, we perform an experiment in unconstrained root growth conditions comparing the development of coupled kin, non-kin and solitary plants of Xanthium italicum. Biometrics of plants with different genetic relatedness were measured, then architecture and competitive interaction were assessed using the relative interaction index (RII) for above and belowground portions of plants. X. italicum showed different allocation depending on the neighbourhood. Root biomass was declined in plants growing with kin compared to non-kin coupled plants, while plants coupled with kin allocated more shoot than roots compared to solitary plants. RII explains phenotypic response of decreased competition in roots rather than in shoots. Despite high values of RII for the aboveground portion, the architectural analysis of shoot, number, angle and length of branches and roots reveals dramatic but indistinctive change in the structure of plants growing near kin or non kin compared to a solitary plant. These results confirm phenotypic responses of kin recognition in unconstrained environment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- RII:
-
Relative Interaction Index
References
Andalo, C, I. Goldringer and B. Godelle. 2001. Inter- and intragenotypic competition under elevated carbon dioxide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 82:157–164.
Argyres, A.Z. and J. Schmitt. 1992. Neighbor relatedness and competitive performance in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae): a test of the resource partitioning hypothesis. Amer. J. Bot. 79:181–185.
Armas, C, R. Ordiales and F.I. Pugnaire. 2004. Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85:2682–2686.
Bhatt, M.V., A. Khandelwal and S.A. Dudley. 2011. Kin recognition, not competitive interactions, predicts root allocation in young Cakile edentula seedling pairs. New Phytol. 189:1135–1142.
Biedrzycki, M.L. and H.P. Bais. 2011a. The role of ABC transporters in kin recognition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signaling & Behavior 6:1154–1161.
Biedrzycki, M.L. and H.P. Bais. 2011b. Transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana plants in response to kin and stranger recognition. Plant Signaling & Behavior 6:1515–1524.
Biedrzycki, M.L., T.A. Jilany, S.A. Dudley and H.P. Bais. 2010. Root exudates mediate kin recognition in plants. Communicative & Integrative Biology 3:28–35.
Biernaskie, J.M. 2011. Evidence for competition and cooperation among climbing plants. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 278:1989–1996.
Callaway, R M. and B.E. Mahall. 2007. Plant ecology: family roots. Nature 448:145–147.
Cartenì, F., G. Bonanomi, F. Giannino, G. Incerti, C.E. Vincenot, M. L. Chiusano and S. Mazzoleni. 2016. Self-DNA inhibitory effects: underlying mechanisms and ecological implications. Plant Signaling & Behavior 11:e1158381.
Chen, B.J., H.J. During, P.J. Vermeulen, H. Kroon, H. Poorter and N.P Anten. 2015. Corrections for rooting volume and plant size reveal negative effects of neighbour presence on root allocation in pea. Funct. Ecol. 29:1383–1391.
Cheplick, G.P and K.H. Kane. 2004. Genetic relatedness and competition in Triplasis purpurea (Poaceae): resource partitioning or kin selection? Int. J. Plant Sci. 165:623–630.
Cid-Benevento, C.R. and B.A. Schaal. 1986. Variation in population growth rate in the woodland annual Impatiens pallida (Balsaminaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 73:1031–1042.
Collins, A., E. Hart and J. Molofsky 2010. Differential response to frequency-dependent interactions: an experimental test using genotypes of an invasive grass. Oecologia 164:959–969.
Crepy, M.A. and J.J. Casal (2015). Photoreceptor-mediated kin recognition in plants. New Phytol. 205:329–338.
Delesalle, V.A., S.J. Mazer and S. Tonsor. 2002. The neighborhood matters: effects of neighbor number and sibling (or kin) competition on floral traits in Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 56:2406–2413.
Donohue, K. 2003. The influence of neighbor relatedness on multilevel selection in the Great Lakes sea rocket. Amer. Nat. 162:77–92.
Dudley, S.A. 2015. Plant cooperation. AoB Plants 7, plv113.
Dudley, S.A. and A.L. File. 2007. Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol. Lett. 3:435–438.
Duran-Flores, D. and M. Heil 2015. Growth inhibition by self-DNA: a phenomenon and its multiple explanations. New Phytol. 207: 482–485.
Ehlers, B.K., P. David, CF. Damgaard and T. Lenormand. 2016. Competitor relatedness, indirect soil effects and plant coexistence. J. Ecol. 104:1126–1135.
Escarre, J., C. Houssard and J.D. Thompson. 1994. An experimental study of the role of seedling density and neighbor relatedness in the persistence of Rumex acetosella in an old-field succession. Can. J. Bot. 72:1273–1281.
File, A.L., J. Klironomos, H. Maherali and S.A. Dudley. 2012. Plant kin recognition enhances abundance of symbiotic microbial partner. PLoS One 7:e45648.
Guerrieri, E. 2016. Who’s listening to talking plants?. In: J.D. Blande and R. Glinwood (eds.), Deciphering Chemical Language of Plant Communication. Springer, Switzerland. pp. 117–136.
Karban, R., K. Shiojiri, S. Ishizaki, W.C Wetzel and R.Y. Evans. 2013. Kin recognition affects plant communication and defence. Proc. Roy. Soc London B: Biol. Sci. 280:20123062.
Lepik, A., M. Abakumova, K. Zobel and M. Semchenko. 2012. Kin recognition is density-dependent and uncommon among temperate grassland plants. Funct Ecol. 26:1214–1220.
Margalef, R. 1963. On certain unifying principles in ecology. Amer. Nat. 97:357–374.
Marler, T.E. 2013. Kin recognition alters root and whole plant growth of split-root Cycas edentata seedlings. HortScience 48:1266–1269.
Masclaux, F., R.L. Hammond, J. Meunier, C. Gouhier-Darimont, L. Keller and P. Reymond. 2010. Competitive ability not kinship affects growth of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. New Phytol 185:322–331.
Mazzoleni, S., G. Bonanomi, G. Incerti, M.L. Chiusano, P. Termolino, A. Mingo, M. Senatore, F. Giannino, F. Cartenìand M. Rietkerk. 2015a. Inhibitory and toxic effects of extracellular self-DNA in litter: a mechanism for negative plant-soil feedbacks? New Phytol. 205:1195–1210.
Mazzoleni, S., F. Cartenì, G. Bonanomi, M. Senatore, P. Termolino, F. Giannino, G. Incerti, M. Rietkerk, V. Lanzotti and M.L. Chiusano. 2015b. Inhibitory effects of extracellular self-DNA: a general biological process? New Phytol. 206:127–132.
McCall, C, T. Mitchell-Olds and D.M. Waller. 1989. Fitness consequences of outcrossing in Impatiens capensis: tests of the frequency-dependent and sib-competition models. Evolution 43:1075–1084.
Milla, R., D.M. Forero, A. Escudero and J.M. Iriondo. 2009. Growing with siblings: a common ground for cooperation or for fiercer competition among plants? Proc. Roy. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 276:2531–2540.
Murphy, G.P and S.A. Dudley. 2009. Kin recognition: competition and cooperation in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 96:1990–1996.
Murphy, G.P, R. Van Acker, I. Rajcan and C.J. Swanton. 2017. Identity recognition in response to different levels of genetic relatedness in commercial soya bean. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 4:160879.
Pignatti, S. 1982. Flora d’Italia. Edagricole, Bologna, Italy.
Schmitt, J. and D.W. Ehrhardt. 1987. A test of the sib-competition hypothesis for outcrossing advantage in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 41:579–590.
Semchenko, M., S. Saar and A. Lepik. 2014. Plant root exudates mediate neighbour recognition and trigger complex behavioural changes. New Phytol. 204:631–637.
Semchenko, M., S. Saar and A. Lepik. 2017. Intraspecific genetic diversity modulates plant–soil feedback and nutrient cycling. New Phytol. 216:90–98.
Tokeshi, M. 2009. Species Coexistence: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. Wiley, New York.
Tonsor, S.J. 1989. Relatedness and intraspecific competition in Plantago lanceolata. Amer. Nat. 134:897–906
Van der Putten, W.H., R.D. Bardgett, J.D. Bever, T.M. Bezemer, B.B. Casper, T. Fukami, P. Kardol, J.N. Klironomos, A. Kulmatiski and J.A. Schweitzer. 2013. Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. J. Ecol. 101:265–276.
Veresoglou, S.D., C.A. Aguilar-Trigueros and M.C Rillig. 2015. Self-DNA: a blessing in disguise? New Phytol. 207:488–490.
Wade, M.J. 1980. An experimental study of kin selection. Evolution 34:844–855
Willson, M.F., W. Hoppes, D. Goldman, P. Thomas, P. Katusic-Malmborg and J. Bothwell. 1987. Sibling competition in plants: an experimental study. Amer. Nat. 129:304–311
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. S. A. Gaglione and S. Spano for technical support in the common garden experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, you give a link to the Creative Commons License, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Abd El-Gawad, A.M., Zotti, M., Sarker, T.C. et al. Does a plant detect its neighbor if it is kin or stranger? Evidence from a common garden experiment. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 18, 305–310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.3.9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.3.9