Abstract
Objective
In the context of COVID-19, Canadian healthcare workers (HCWs) worked long hours, both to respond to the pandemic and to compensate for colleagues who were not able to work due to infection and burnout. This may have had detrimental effects on HCWs’ mental health, as well as engagement in health-promoting behaviours. This study aimed to identify changes in mental health outcomes and health behaviours experienced by Canadian HCWs throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
Nine representative samples (Ntotal = 1615 HCWs) completed the iCARE survey using an online polling firm between April 2020 (Time 1) and February 2022 (Time 9). Participants were asked about the psychological effects of COVID-19 (e.g., feeling anxious) and about changes in their health behaviours (e.g., alcohol use, physical activity).
Results
A majority of the HCWs identified as female (65%), were younger than 44 years old (66%), and had a university degree (55%). Female HCWs were more likely than male HCWs to report feeling anxious (OR = 2.68 [1.75, 4.12]), depressed (OR = 1.63 [1.02, 2.59]), and irritable (OR = 1.61 [1.08, 2.40]) throughout the first two years of the pandemic. Female HCWs were more likely than their male counterparts to report eating more unhealthy diets (OR = 1.54 [1.02, 2.31]). Significant differences were also revealed by age, education level, income, parental status, health status, and over time.
Conclusion
Results demonstrate that the impacts of COVID-19 on HCWs’ mental health and health behaviours were significant, and varied by sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., sex, age, income).
Résumé
Objectif
Dans le contexte de la COVID-19, les travailleurs de la santé canadiens ont travaillé de longues heures, à la fois pour répondre à la pandémie et pour compenser pour les collègues qui n’étaient pas en mesure de travailler en raison d’infection et d’épuisement professionnel. Cela a pu générer un important impact sur leur santé mentale, ainsi que sur leurs engagements dans des comportements favorables à la santé.
Méthodes
Neuf échantillons représentatifs (Ntotal = 1 615 travailleurs de la santé) ont répondu à l’enquête iCARE par l’intermédiaire d’une compagnie de sondage en ligne entre avril 2020 (temps 1) et février 2022 (temps 9). Les participants ont été interrogés sur les effets psychologiques de la COVID-19 (p.ex., le sentiment d’anxiété) et sur les changements dans leurs comportements de santé (p.ex., la consommation d’alcool, l’activité physique).
Résultats
La majorité des travailleurs de santé répondants sont des femmes (65 %), ont moins de 44 ans (66 %) et ont un diplôme universitaire (55 %). Les femmes travailleuses de la santé étaient plus susceptibles de se sentir anxieuses (OR = 2,68 [1,75, 4,12]), déprimées (OR = 1,63 [1,02, 2,59) et irritables (OR = 1,61 [1,08, 2,40]) que les hommes au cours des deux premières années de la pandémie. Les femmes travailleuses de la santé étaient plus susceptibles d’avoir une alimentation plus malsaine (OR = 1,54 [1,02, 2,31]) que leurs homologues masculins. Des différences significatives ont également été révélées selon l’âge, le niveau d’éducation, le revenu, le statut parental, l’état de santé et à travers le temps.
Conclusion
Les résultats démontrent que les impacts de COVID-19 sur la santé mentale et les comportements de santé des travailleurs de santé sont significatifs, mais varient selon les caractéristiques sociodémographiques (p.ex., le sexe, l’âge, le revenu).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Healthcare workers (HCWs) account for the largest sector of government employees in Canada (Statistics Canada, 2017). The Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions, which recruited 7358 Canadian nurses in 2019 just prior to the pandemic, reported that nurses have a high prevalence of depressive (36%), anxiety (26%), and panic (20%) disorders (Stelnicki & Carleton, 2021). They also tend to work longer shifts, more overtime, and more unpaid overtime, and have more conflict at work compared to those in the general Canadian population (Shields & Wilkins, 2005). Similarly, a 2017 National Physician Health Survey including over 2500 physicians reported they too experienced high levels of emotional exhaustion (26%), burnout (30%), depression (34%), and suicidal ideation (9-19%) even before the pandemic (Canadian Medical Association, 2018). Physicians have also been shown to experience more than twice as much high work stress (64% compared to 27%) as the general Canadian population (Statistics Canada, 2017; Wilkins, 2007). The mental health problems reported by HCWs appear to be a direct consequence of their workload, which is physically and emotionally demanding (Embriaco et al., 2007; Kirby, 2008; Martin, 2018).
Psychological consequences of COVID-19 on HCWs
During the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, HCWs across the globe reported greater negative mental health consequences (e.g., stress, depression symptoms) compared to pre-pandemic levels (Bai et al., 2004; Marjanovic et al., 2007; Ménard et al., 2022). HCWs have, at different periods of the pandemic, experienced events that may have undermined their mental health (e.g., quarantine, or knowing someone who died from the virus; Spilg et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2020). Meta-analyses have examined the prevalence of different mental health outcomes in HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic, and found a pooled prevalence of experiencing depressive symptoms ranging from 22% to 33%, anxiety symptoms ranging from 20% to 42%, post-traumatic symptoms ranging from 21% to 32%, and insomnia ranging from 39% to 42% (Aymerich et al., 2022; Batra et al., 2020; Johns et al., 2022; Li et al., 2021; Pappa et al., 2020). These global findings are consistent with those reported by Statistics Canada, whereby 33% of HCWs between November and December 2020 (n=18,000) reported overall poor mental health. In the report, more nurses (37%) and personal care workers (35%) reported overall poor mental health compared to physicians (27%; Statistics Canada, 2021).
Several studies have examined the mental health status of HCWs in Canada during the pandemic, but these were mainly assessed in 2020 exclusively and were restricted to depressive and anxiety symptoms (Binnie et al., 2021; Crowe et al., 2021; Havaei et al., 2021; Ménard et al., 2022). There has been little or no mention of changes in HCWs’ health behaviours (e.g., physical activity, recreational drug use) which may have further exacerbated their mental health decline during the pandemic (Carazo et al., 2022; Crowe et al., 2022; Robillard et al., 2021; Wilbiks et al., 2021). Additionally, while research in the general population demonstrates different impacts of the pandemic on mental health by sociodemographic factors such as gender, sex, minority status, and socioeconomic status, it remains uninvestigated in HCWs (Ettman et al., 2020; Pierce et al., 2020).
The aims of the current study were to (1) report mental health and health behaviour outcomes among Canadian HCWs during the first 21 months of the pandemic (9 cross-sectional population-based samples between April 2020 and February 2022), and (2) examine whether there were any differences in mental health and health behaviour outcomes as a function of sex, or other sociodemographic and health variables. By examining such differences, Canadian healthcare institutions may have new, important information to design programs to better support HCWs and optimize the physical and mental health of those most impacted by the pandemic.
Methods
Study design and recruitment
We report data from the International COVID-19 Awareness and Responses Evaluation (iCARE) Study (www.icarestudy.com) using 9 waves of the Canadian representative sample from April 2020 to February 2022 (see Table 1). Each wave included a new independent sample. The details and methodological background of the iCARE study have been published elsewhere (Bacon et al., 2021). Briefly, 9 cross-sectional age, sex, and province-weighted population-based samples of adults 18 years and older were recruited to complete online surveys by the Leger Opinion polling firm, which recruits participants through their closed, proprietary online panel. This panel of participants included over 400,000 Canadians, the majority of whom (61%) were recruited within the past 10 years. Two thirds of the panel were recruited randomly by telephone, with the remainder recruited via publicity and social media. Respondents were invited to complete the survey by email and did so voluntarily. Leger Opinion sent panelists a unique link to complete each survey so that they could not complete a survey more than once. Across the 9 assessments, 183,358 participants were invited to respond to the surveys (mean per survey = 20,373±4758 invitations), with a response rate of 15.9% (±4.3%, ranging from 11.4% to 25.0%).
Online consent was provided by participants prior to completing the survey. No personal identifying information was collected. Participants were offered nominal compensation through the polling firm (participants collect points that can be traded in for gift cards); no direct compensation was provided by the research team. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM; REB#: 2020-2099/03-25-2020). The present paper is presented in line with the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES, see Supplementary Table 1; Eysenbach, 2004).
iCARE Survey Questionnaire
For the current set of analyses, participants were included when they answered “Yes” to the question “Are you a healthcare worker?”. A detailed account of the survey questions is provided elsewhere (online: https://osf.io/nswcm/) and questions specific to this study are included in Supplementary Table 2. Each of the nine surveys included an average of 75 questions and took 15–20 mins to complete. Questions were presented in the same order across surveys, but the response set order was randomized for questions with multiple subitems to reduce bias. Some questions were conditionally displayed based on responses to previous items to reduce the number and complexity of the items. Completing all questions was mandatory to move forward, but many questions included the option “I don’t know/I prefer not to answer”. All details about the survey development have been published elsewhere (Bacon et al., 2021).
Outcomes
Mental health outcomes were measured with 4 different items (anxious, depressed, isolated, irritable) assessing participants’ emotional status over the past month. For each mental health outcome, we asked the participant “Please rate the extent to which COVID-19 has impacted the following aspects of your life over the last month”, with the following possible answers: To a Great Extent, Somewhat, Very Little, and Not at All. Health behaviour changes were measured with 6 different items (physical activity, healthy diet, drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes, using e-cigarettes, and using recreational drugs) assessing whether engagement in these behaviours changed (doing the behaviour a lot more to doing it a lot less) from pre-pandemic levels. For each health behaviour, we asked the participant “In general, how have the following behaviours changed since the start of COVID-19?”, with the following possible answers: I do this a lot more, I do this more, I do this as much as before, I do this less, I do this a lot less, I don’t do this. The variables responses were merged and dichotomized for mental health outcomes (1 = to a great extent, 0 = all other choices) and health behaviour changes (1 = I do this a lot less or I do this less [health positive behaviour: physical activity, healthy diet], I do this much more or I do this more [health negative behaviour: drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes, using e-cigarettes, using recreational drugs]; 0 = all other choices; see Supplementary Table 2).
Moderator variables
The following sociodemographic and health variables were used as moderators for the analyses: sex, age, education level, household income, parental status, and health condition status (having or not).
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics for the outcome and moderator variables at each time point are presented in Table 2. Pearson chi-square tests were performed to assess differences in mental health (1= to a great extent, 0 = all other choices) and health behaviours (1 = I do this a lot less/more, I do this more/less; 0 = all other choices) for each moderator variable. All items that included ‘I don’t know/I prefer not to answer’ responses were considered missing values, and statistical analyses were based on complete case records. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted using the SAS logistic regression procedure (PROC LOGISTIC) to assess the associations between either mental health outcomes or health behaviours (dependent variables) with a series of sociodemographic and health factors (independent variables) informed from the existing literature (i.e., sex, age, education level, household income, parental status, and health condition status; Lavoie et al., 2022; Leach et al., 2021). All statistical tests included the weighting variables as a covariate and were two-sided, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4.
Results
Participant characteristics
The sample consisted of 1615 HCWs over 9 assessment periods (see Table 1). The majority were female (66.0%), were aged 18-44 years (66.4%), had a university degree (54.9%,), had a household income ≥$60K or more (63.1%), did not have children (63.5%), and did not have a health condition (63.2%). See Table 2 for more details.
COVID-19–related outcomes
Tables 3 and 4 present results for mental health and behavioural outcomes for the total sample and by sociodemographic variables (i.e., sex, age, education, income, parents, health status). In general, at least one out of five HCWs reported high levels of mental health problems in the last month, with the greatest proportion reporting feeling anxious (22.7%), isolated (22.3%), irritable (22.0%) and depressed (19.3%). Moreover, 39.0%, 26.4%, and 23.8% of HCWs reported decreasing their physical activity, eating less healthy diets, and drinking more alcohol, respectively, compared to pre-pandemic.
Sex
Female as compared with male HCWs reported feeling significantly more anxious (13.3% difference), depressed (7.3% difference), isolated (5.1% difference), and irritable (8.8 % difference). Female (vs. male) HCWs also reported engaging in significantly less physical activity (1.8% difference) and were eating less healthy diets (5.9% difference) compared to pre-pandemic. However, male (vs. female) HCWs reported smoking significantly more cigarettes (7.3% difference), using more e-cigarettes (8.1% difference), and using more recreational drugs (8.4% difference) compared to pre-pandemic.
Age
Younger (18-44 years of age) HCWs reported feeling significantly more anxious (7.3% difference), depressed (7.0% difference), isolated (7.5% difference), and irritable (6.3% difference) compared to HCWs 45 years of age or more. Finally, compared to older HCWs, younger HCWs also reported engaging in significantly less positive health behaviours since the pandemic started across all 6 behaviours assessed.
Education level
HCWs with a high school degree or less reported feeling significantly more isolated than those with a university degree (5.7% difference). HCWs with a high school degree or less were also significantly more likely to report engaging in less physical activity compared to pre-pandemic than those with a university degree (1.9% difference).
Household income
HCWs with household incomes below (vs. above) $60K reported feeling significantly more depressed (10.5% difference), isolated (5.6% difference), and irritable (9.1% difference). Also, compared to HCWs with incomes ≥$60K, HCWs with incomes less than $60K smoked more cigarettes (16.5% compared to 10.5%; p=0.003) and used more recreational drugs (19.5% compared to 11.9%; p=0.002) since the beginning of the pandemic.
Parental status
Compared to HCWs without children, those who were parents reported feeling significantly more anxious (5.8% difference). HCWs with (vs. without) children reported they were eating significantly less healthy diets (11.3% difference) and drinking more alcohol (6.2% difference) since the beginning of the pandemic.
Pre-existing physical health condition
HCWs with (vs. without) at least one medical health condition reported feeling significantly more anxious (8.0% difference), depressed (8.9% difference), and isolated (4.1% difference). HCWs with a medical health condition significantly, compared to those without, drank more alcohol (7.7% difference), smoked more cigarettes (9.8% difference), and used more e-cigarettes (4.0% difference) and recreational drugs (4.4% difference) since the beginning of the pandemic.
Changes over time
Over time, there were significant increases in HCWs who reported feeling more depressed, ranging from 14.5% (June 2020) to 32.7% (March 2021), and feeling more isolated, peaking at 38.4% in June 2021. For health behaviours, over time, there were significant increases in HCWs who were using e-cigarettes, ranging from 4.3% (January-February 2021) to 16.6% (November-December 2021), and using recreational drugs, ranging from 7.3% (January-February 2021) to 25.5% (June 2021). No other mental health or health behavioural outcomes had significant trend differences between the time points.
Predictors of mental health outcomes
Multivariable logistic regression analyses examining associations between mental health outcomes with all sociodemographic and health factors in one model across all surveys/time points are presented in Table 5. Female HCWs were 2.68 (95% CI 1.75 to 4.12) times more likely to report feeling more anxious, 1.63 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.59) times more depressed, and 1.61 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.40) times more irritable compared to male HCWs. Younger (18-44 years of age) HCWs were 1.79 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.71) times, 2.07 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.30) times, and 1.76 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.75) times more likely to feel more anxious, depressed, and isolated, respectively, compared to HCWs 45 years of age or more. HCWs with a high school degree or less were 1.53 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.22) times more likely to feel isolated than those with a university degree. HCWs with household incomes below (vs. above) $60K were 1.71 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.61) times more likely to feel depressed. HCWs without a health condition were less likely to report being anxious (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.72), depressed (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.71), and isolated (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.96) than those with at least one health condition. In November 2021, HCWs were 67% (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.68) more likely to feel isolated, compared to January 2022. Finally, in June 2020, HCWs were 61% (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.83) and 64% (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.72) more likely to feel depressed and isolated, respectively, compared to January 2022. These results are, by and large, consistent with the results from the bivariate analyses presented above, with few exceptions (i.e., being a parent was no longer significantly associated with feeling anxious, sex was no longer associated with feeling isolated, and health conditions were now significantly associated with feeling isolated).
Predictors of health behaviour outcomes
Multivariable logistic regression analyses examining associations between health behaviour change with sociodemographic and health factors across all surveys/time points are presented in the Table 6. Since the beginning of the pandemic, female HCWs were 1.54 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.31) times more likely to eat less healthy diets compared with male HCWs, but males were 63% (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.72) and 51% (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.82) more likely to use more e-cigarettes and recreational drugs, respectively. Younger (vs. older) HCWs were 1.70 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.71) times and 2.41 (95% CI 1.22 to 4.77) times more likely to eat a less healthy diet and used more recreational drugs, respectively, since the beginning of the pandemic. HCWs with (vs. those without) children were 38% (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.94) more likely to report they were eating significantly less healthy diets since the beginning of the pandemic. HCWs without a medical health condition (vs. those with at least one) were 46% (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.99) more likely to smoke more cigarettes since the beginning of the pandemic. HCWs were 1.92 (95% CI 1.02 to 3.62) times more likely to drink more alcohol in June 2021 than in January 2022. Also, HCWs were 2.76 (95% CI 1.07 to 7.13) and 3.20 (95% CI 1.25 to 8.21) times more likely to smoke cigarettes during September and November 2021, respectively, than in January 2022. Finally, in June 2020, HCWs were 65% (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.82) more likely to use recreational drugs than in January 2022.
Discussion
The results of this study including multiple surveys over the first two years of the pandemic demonstrated significant impacts of COVID-19 on Canadian HCWs’ mental health outcomes and health behaviours, which varied by sociodemographic factors and health status. Between April 9, 2020 and February 2, 2022, ~20-23% of HCWs reported being anxious, irritable, isolated, or depressed to a great extent. Furthermore, nearly 40% of HCWs reported engaging in less physical activity during the first two years since the pandemic started, and approximately one quarter reported eating less healthy diets and drinking alcohol more. A peak is observed for mental health outcomes and poor health behaviours between March and June 2021.
While there was some variability across mental health and health behaviour outcomes, in general, HCWs who identified as female, were younger, had annual household incomes below $60K, or were living with a physical health condition reported worse mental health throughout the pandemic than their counterparts. Similarly, younger HCWs, those with a lower household income, and those who were living with a physical health condition reported consistently worse health behaviours than their counterparts. Finally, whereas female (as compared with male) HCWs reported reductions in healthy eating and physical activity since the start of the pandemic, male HCWs reported greater use of recreational drugs and cigarettes (combustible or e-cigarettes). The totality of these findings speaks to significant, wide-ranging mental health and behavioural impacts of the pandemic on HCWs that varied by sociodemographic and health status.
Mental health results for the full sample of HCWs in the present study are consistent with, though lower than, previous national reports which showed that 36% and 26% of Canadian HCWs reported significant depression or anxiety, respectively (Canadian Medical Association, 2018; Stelnicki & Carleton, 2021). The iCARE study, from which these data were retrieved, had slightly lower proportions of HCWs reporting mental health issues, perhaps attributable to the fact that the current study utilized single items to assess each mental health outcome. Previous Canadian and international studies have also shown significant mental health effects resulting from the pandemic that varied by sociodemographic factors (Pierce et al., 2020) and health status (Deslauriers et al., 2022), but few have examined whether such differences existed in HCWs. Our study revealed that the pandemic disproportionately impacted similar groups as in the general population, namely females (Jenkins et al., 2021), younger people (El-Gabalawy & Sommer, 2021), individuals with children (Gadermann et al., 2021), lower socioeconomic status individuals (Miconi et al., 2021; Raina et al., 2021), and those experiencing health problems (Deslauriers et al., 2022). These results highlight the need for wide-scale and targeted wellness and behavioural intervention programming within healthcare systems across the country (Yang et al., 2021).
Future directions
Many interventions for HCWs focus on mental health education, access to psychological support, or a multidisciplinary approach (i.e., peer support, health consultant; Buselli et al., 2021; Robins-Browne et al., 2022), but few interventions address the mental health of HCWs through behaviour change initiatives targeting specific behavioural outcomes (e.g., physical activity, alcohol consumption). In comparison with before the COVID-19 pandemic, the present study revealed that overall, HCWs have changed their health behaviours, with more than a third being less physically active (38%) and more than a quarter eating a less healthy diet (26%). Also, alcohol consumption, cigarette or e-cigarette use, and recreational drug use were more notable in the present study. It would seem that those most at risk for engaging in more unhealthy behaviours were HCWs who were male, were 18-44 years of age, had a household income under $60K, or had a health condition, a trend that was similarly observed very early on in the pandemic globally (Arora & Grey, 2020) and for the general Canadian population (Zajacova et al., 2020).
Limitations of the study
Our sample of HCWs was drawn from the larger iCARE study and did not intentionally or actively target recruitment of HCWs. A survey with HCWs as the target population could have potentially increased the sample size or accuracy of the data. However, the proportion of HCWs in our samples represented 5.9% of the full iCARE sample, which is consistent with the proportional representation of Canadians who identify as HCWs (5.5%). Additionally, we do not have the specific profession of HCWs (e.g., registered nurses, physicians, administrative staffs), limiting the interpretation and generalizability of the results knowing that COVID-19 may have had different impacts depending on profession type (Statistics Canada, 2021). A second limitation is that the mental health and behavioural questions were single items developed for their face/ecological validity (as often done in broad epidemiological research) and were not validated or standardized questionnaires. Including comprehensive questionnaires for mental health-related symptoms could be considered for future iterations, and greater efforts to validate single item questions and to ensure their reliability are needed. While representative sampling has strengths (e.g., proportion of the population by sociodemographic characteristics, random-digit sampling), it is not without selection bias. As previously shown (Joyal-Desmarais et al., 2022), the samples from the Leger panel were not fully representative of the Canadian population (e.g., age, language, education). Also, due to the sampling methods of the Leger Opinion polling firm, it is not possible to know whether a respondent has participated in and contributed to several data collection times. Finally, we report the results of a series of surveys which were sent during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and to different participants (cohorts) at each time point. As this is cross-sectional data, it is not possible to track individual changes over time, and these kinds of analyses would add to the current study.
Conclusion
The current study found that HCWs—especially those who identified as female, were younger, had one or more health conditions, or had an income of less than $60K—experienced worse mental health outcomes and engaged in poorer health behaviours during the first 2 years of the pandemic. Although this study does not show the direct links of COVID-19–related policies instituted in healthcare settings and mental health or health behaviours of HCWs, it should not be ignored that these outcomes need to be a primary focal target of Canadian and provincial healthcare ministries.
Contributions to knowledge
What does this study add to existing knowledge?
-
Our findings add to the literature around the mental health and health behaviours of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
Results from our study indicate that healthcare workers who were female, younger, living with one or more health conditions, or having a household income of less than $60K were the most impacted.
What are the key implications for public health interventions, practice or policy?
-
These results direct attention to the need to develop behavioural intervention strategies that directly target the healthcare workers most disproportionately impacted by the pandemic.
-
Canadian health administrations need to address these growing disparities through institutional policies and wellness programming.
Availability of data and material
Surveys information, protocol and project content can be found here: https://osf.io/nswcm/
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Arora, T., & Grey, I. (2020). Health behaviour changes during COVID-19 and the potential consequences: A mini-review. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(9), 1155–1163.
Aymerich, C., Pedruzo, B., Pérez, J. L., Laborda, M., Herrero, J., Blanco, J., . . . González-Torres, M. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker’s mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 65(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1
Bacon, S. L., Lavoie, K. L., Boyle, J., Stojanovic, J., & Joyal-Desmarais, K. (2021). International assessment of the link between COVID-19 related attitudes, concerns and behaviours in relation to public health policies: Optimising policy strategies to improve health, economic and quality of life outcomes (the iCARE Study). BMJ Open, 11(3), e046127.
Bai, Y., Lin, C.-C., Lin, C.-Y., Chen, J.-Y., Chue, C.-M., & Chou, P. (2004). Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatric Services, 55(9), 1055–1057.
Batra, K., Singh, T. P., Sharma, M., Batra, R., & Schvaneveldt, N. (2020). Investigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239096
Binnie, A., Moura, K., Moura, C., D’Aragon, F., & Tsang, J. L. (2021). Psychosocial distress amongst Canadian intensive care unit healthcare workers during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 16(8), e0254708.
Buselli, R., Corsi, M., Veltri, A., Baldanzi, S., Chiumiento, M., Del Lupo, E., … Foddis, R. (2021). Mental health of Health Care Workers (HCWs): a review of organizational interventions put in place by local institutions to cope with new psychosocial challenges resulting from COVID-19. Psychiatry Research, 299, 113847.
Canadian Medical Association. (2018). CMA National Physician Health Survey: a national snapshot. Canadian Medical Association.
Carazo, S., Pelletier, M., Talbot, D., Jauvin, N., De Serres, G., & Vézina, M. (2022). Psychological distress of healthcare workers in Québec (Canada) during the second and the third pandemic waves. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(6), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000002487
Crowe, S., Fuchsia Howard, A., & Vanderspank, B. (2022). The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadian critical care nurses. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 71, 103241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103241
Crowe, S., Howard, A. F., Vanderspank-Wright, B., Gillis, P., McLeod, F., Penner, C., & Haljan, G. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of Canadian critical care nurses providing patient care during the early phase pandemic: A mixed method study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 63, 102999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102999
Deslauriers, F., Gosselin-Boucher, V., Léger, C., Vieira, A. M., Bacon, S. L., & Lavoie, K. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on the lives of Canadians with and without non-communicable chronic diseases: Results from the iCARE Study. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2139921/v1
El-Gabalawy, R., & Sommer, J. L. (2021). “We are at risk too”: the disparate mental health impacts of the pandemic on younger generations. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(7), 634–644.
Embriaco, N., Papazian, L., Kentish-Barnes, N., Pochard, F., & Azoulay, E. (2007). Burnout syndrome among critical care healthcare workers. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 13(5), 482–488.
Ettman, C. K., Abdalla, S. M., Cohen, G. H., Sampson, L., Vivier, P. M., & Galea, S. (2020). Prevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Network Open, 3(9), e2019686–e2019686.
Eysenbach, G. (2004). Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res, 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Gadermann, A. C., Thomson, K. C., Richardson, C. G., Gagné, M., McAuliffe, C., Hirani, S., & Jenkins, E. (2021). Examining the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on family mental health in Canada: findings from a national cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 11(1), e042871.
Havaei, F., Smith, P., Oudyk, J., & Potter, G. G. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of nurses in British Columbia, Canada using trends analysis across three time points. Annals of Epidemiology, 62, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.05.004
Jenkins, E. K., McAuliffe, C., Hirani, S., Richardson, C., Thomson, K. C., McGuinness, L., … Gadermann, A. (2021). A portrait of the early and differential mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Findings from the first wave of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Preventive Medicine, 145, 106333.
Johns, G., Samuel, V., Freemantle, L., Lewis, J., & Waddington, L. (2022). The global prevalence of depression and anxiety among doctors during the covid-19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord, 298(Pt A), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.026
Joyal-Desmarais, K., Stojanovic, J., Kennedy, E. B., Enticott, J. C., Boucher, V. G., Vo, H., … on behalf of iCARE Study Team. (2022). How well do covariates perform when adjusting for sampling bias in online COVID-19 research? Insights from multiverse analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology, 37(12), 1233–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00932-y
Kirby, M. (2008). Mental health in Canada: out of the shadows forever. CMAJ, 178(10), 1320–1322.
Lavoie, K., Gosselin-Boucher, V., Stojanovic, J., Gupta, S., Gagné, M., Joyal-Desmarais, K., … Voisard, B. (2022). Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada: results from five sequential cross-sectional representative surveys spanning April 2020–March 2021. BMJ Open, 12(4), e059411.
Leach, C. R., Rees-Punia, E., Newton, C. C., Chantaprasopsuk, S., Patel, A. V., & Westmaas, J. L. (2021). Stressors and other pandemic-related predictors of prospective changes in psychological distress. The Lancet Regional Health-Americas, 4, 100069.
Li, Y., Scherer, N., Felix, L., & Kuper, H. (2021). Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 16(3), e0246454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246454
Marjanovic, Z., Greenglass, E. R., & Coffey, S. (2007). The relevance of psychosocial variables and working conditions in predicting nurses’ coping strategies during the SARS crisis: An online questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(6), 991–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.012
Martin, M. (2018). Physician well-being: Physician burnout. FP Essent, 471, 11–15.
Ménard, A. D., Soucie, K., Freeman, L. A., & Ralph, J. L. (2022). “My problems aren’t severe enough to seek help”: Stress levels and use of mental health supports by Canadian hospital employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Policy, 126(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.002
Miconi, D., Li, Z. Y., Frounfelker, R. L., Santavicca, T., Cénat, J. M., Venkatesh, V., & Rousseau, C. (2021). Ethno-cultural disparities in mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study on the impact of exposure to the virus and COVID-19-related discrimination and stigma on mental health across ethno-cultural groups in Quebec (Canada). The British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 7(1), E14. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.146
Pappa, S., Ntella, V., Giannakas, T., Giannakoulis, V. G., Papoutsi, E., & Katsaounou, P. (2020). Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun, 88, 901–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026
Pierce, M., Hope, H., Ford, T., Hatch, S., Hotopf, M., John, A., … McManus, S. (2020). Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(10), 883–892.
Raina, P., Wolfson, C., Griffith, L., Kirkland, S., McMillan, J., Basta, N., … Maimon, G. (2021). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of middle-aged and older adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Nature Aging, 1(12), 1137–1147.
Robillard, R., Daros, A. R., Phillips, J. L., Porteous, M., Saad, M., Pennestri, M.-H., … Bhatla, R. (2021). Emerging new psychiatric symptoms and the worsening of pre-existing mental disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Canadian multisite study. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(9), 815–826.
Robins-Browne, K., Lewis, M., Burchill, L. J., Gilbert, C., Johnson, C., O’Donnell, M., … Palmer, V. J. (2022). Interventions to support the mental health and well-being of front-line healthcare workers in hospitals during pandemics: an evidence review and synthesis. BMJ Open, 12(11), e061317. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061317
Shields, M., & Wilkins, K. (2005). National Survey of the Work and Health of Nurses. Canadian Institute for Health Innovation: Statistics Canada.
Spilg, E. G., Rushton, C. H., Phillips, J. L., Kendzerska, T., Saad, M., Gifford, W., … Quilty, L. (2022). The new frontline: exploring the links between moral distress, moral resilience and mental health in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), 1–12.
Statistics Canada. (2017). Work-Related Stress. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/contest/finalists-finalistes_2-eng.htm
Statistics Canada. (2021). Mental health among health care workers in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Daily. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210202/dq210202a-eng.htm
Stelnicki, A. M., & Carleton, R. N. (2021). Mental disorder symptoms among nurses in Canada. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 53(3), 264–276.
Wilbiks, J. M., Best, L. A., Law, M. A., & Roach, S. P. (2021). Evaluating the mental health and well-being of Canadian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak. Paper presented at the Healthcare Management Forum.
Wilkins, K. (2007). Work stress among health care providers. Health Reports, 18(4), 82–003.
Wu, P. E., Styra, R., & Gold, W. L. (2020). Mitigating the psychological effects of COVID-19 on health care workers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 192(17), E459–E460. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200519
Yang, L., Yin, J., Wang, D., Rahman, A., & Li, X. (2021). Urgent need to develop evidence-based self-help interventions for mental health of healthcare workers in COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Medicine, 51(10), 1775–1776.
Zajacova, A., Jehn, A., Stackhouse, M., Denice, P., & Ramos, H. (2020). Changes in health behaviours during early COVID-19 and socio-demographic disparities: a cross-sectional analysis. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 111(6), 953–962.
Acknowledgements
iCARE team:
Lead investigators: Kim L. Lavoie, PhD, University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM) and CIUSSS-NIM, CANADA; Simon L. Bacon, PhD, Concordia University and CIUSSS-NIM, CANADA.
Collaborators (in alphabetical order): ARGENTINA: Nora Granana, PhD, Hospital Durand; AUSTRALIA: Jacqueline Boyle, PhD, Monash University; Margie Danchin, PhD, Melbourne Medical School; Joanne Enticott, PhD, Monash University; Jessica Kaufman, PhD, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; AUSTRIA: Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, MD, Medizinische Universität Wien; BRAZIL: Eduardo Caputo, PhD, Universidade Federal de Pelotas; CANADA: Mohamad Baydoun, PhD, University of Regina; Andrea Gershon, PhD, Sunnybrook Research Institute; Ariane Bélanger-Gravel, PhD, Université Laval; Tavis Campbell, PhD, University of Calgary; Linda Carlson, PhD, University of Calgary; Kim Corace, PhD, University of Ottawa; Rubee Dev, PhD, University of British Colombia; Olivier Drouin, MD, CHU Sainte-Justine/Université de Montréal; Gary Garber, PhD, University of Ottawa/Public Health Ontario; Vincent Gosselin Boucher, PhD, UQAM, University of British Colombia; Samir Gupta, MD, University of Toronto; Catherine Herba, PhD, UQAM; Jack Jedwab, PhD, Canadian Institute for Identities and Migration and the Association for Canadian Studies; Keven Joyal-Desmarais, PhD, Concordia University; Eric Kennedy, PhD, York University; Joanne Liu, PhD, McGill University; Sandra Pelaez, PhD, Université de Montréal; Paul Poirier, MD, Université Laval; Justin Presseau, PhD, University of Ottawa; Eli Puterman, PhD, University of British Columbia; Joshua Rash, PhD, Memorial University; Johanne Saint-Charles, PhD, UQAM; Jovana Stojanovic, PhD, Concordia University; Michael Spivock, PhD, Shared Services Canada; Geneviève Szczepanik, PhD, MBMC; Michael Vallis, PhD, Dalhousie University; COLOMBIA: Mariantonia Lemos-Hoyos, PhD, Universidad EAFIT; CYPRUS: Angelos Kassianos, PhD, University of Cyprus; FRANCE: Gregory Ninot, PhD, Université de Montpellier; Mathieu Beraneck, PhD, Université de Paris, CNRS; GERMANY: Beate Ditzen, PhD, Heidelberg University; GREECE: Theodora Skoura, PhD, Aretaieio Hospital Athens University; INDIA: Delfin Lovelina Francis, MDS (PhD), Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, SIMATS; IRELAND: Hannah Durand, PhD, National University of Ireland, Galway; Oonagh Meade, PhD, National University of Ireland, Galway; Gerry Molloy, PhD, National University of Ireland, Galway; Chris Noone, PhD, National University of Ireland, Galway; ITALY: Stefania Paduano, PhD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Valeria Raparelli, PhD, Sapienza - University of Rome; KENYA: Hildah Oburu, PhD, University of Nairobi; SAUDI ARABIA: Abu Zeeshan Bari, PhD, Taibah University; SLOVAKIA: Iveta Nagyova, PhD, PJ Safarik University - UPJS; SWITZERLAND: Susanne Fischer, PhD, University of Zurich; TURKEY: Ceprail Şimşek, MD, Health Science University; UK: Joanne Hart, PhD, Manchester University; Lucie Byrne-Davis, PhD, University of Manchester; Nicola Paine, PhD, Loughborough University; Susan Michie, PhD, University College London; USA: Michele Okun, PhD, University of Colorado; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, PhD, University of Michigan; Johannes Thrul, PhD, Johns Hopkins University; Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald, PhD, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Abebaw Yohannes, PhD, Azusa Pacific University.
Students (in alphabetical order): AUSTRALIA: Shrinkhala Dawadi, MSc, Monash University; Kushan Ranakombu, PhD, Monash University; BRAZIL: Daisuke Hayashi Neto, BA, Unicamp; CANADA: Frédérique Deslauriers, BA, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Amandine Gagnon-Hébert, BA, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Mahrukh Jamil, BA, Concordia University and CIUSSS-NIM; Camille Léger, BSc, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Callum MacLeay, BA, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Ariany Marques Vieira, MSc, Concordia University and CIUSSS-NIM; Sarah O’Connor, BA, Université Laval; Zackary van Allen, PhD, University of Ottawa; COLOMBIA: Susana Torres, MSc, Universidad EAFIT.
Community Participants: CANADA: Sophie Duval, MSc; Johanne O’Malley; Katherine Séguin, BA; Kyle Warkentin; INDIA: Sarah Nethan.
Funding
iCARE project is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR: MM1-174903; MS3-173099; SMC-151518; PJT-479128), the Canada Research Chairs Program (950-232522, chair holder: Dr. Kim L. Lavoie), the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQ-S: 251618 and 34757), the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Société et culture (FRQSC: 2019-SE1-252541), and the ministère de l’Économie et de l’Innovation du Québec (2020-2022-COVID-19-PSOv2a-51754). Dr Gosselin Boucher is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MFE-181809), the Fonds de Recherche du Québec: Santé (313956), and the Michael Smith Health Research BC (2021-1498). Dr. Puterman is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research – Physical Activity and Health Chair. Dr. Bacon is supported by the CIHR-SPOR initiative through the Mentoring Chair program (SMC-151518) and by the Fonds de recherche du Québec: Santé (FRQS) through the Chaire de recherche double en Intelligence Artificielle / Santé Numérique ET sciences de la vie program (309811). Dr. Lavoie is supported by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair (950-232522) and a UQAM Strategic Research Chair. Ms. Léger is supported by a MBMC/CIHR Master’s scholarship. Ms. Deslauriers is supported by a CIHR Masters scholarship.The study sponsors had no role in the design of the database or the data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Gosselin Boucher, Bacon, Lavoie and Puterman contributed to the conception and design of the work. Gosselin Boucher, Léger, Deslauriers, Bacon, and Lavoie contributed to data acquisition. Gosselin Boucher, Bacon, Lavoie and Puterman contributed to data analysis. All authors contributed to data interpretation. Gosselin Boucher drafted the manuscript. All authors revised it, and gave final approval.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM; REB#: 2020-2099/03-25-2020).
Consent to participate
All participants consented online before completing the survey.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The complete list of iCARE Study collaborators appears at the end of the article.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Boucher, V.G., Haight, B.L., Léger, C. et al. Canadian healthcare workers’ mental health and health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from nine representative samples between April 2020 and February 2022. Can J Public Health 114, 823–839 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00807-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00807-z