Abstract
Context
There remains no gold standard or even true agreement among clinicians as to which electrophysiological tests are most important and most relevant particularly in the mild and early carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Aim
The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic (EDX) techniques to confirm the clinically diagnosed patients with mild CTS.
Patients and methods
This is a descriptive study. A total of 109 hands (68 right hands and 41 left hands) with symptoms consistent with mild idiopathic CTS, as well as 100 hands from controls, were clinically examined and underwent EDX evaluation.
Results
The ring-difference and thumb-difference had the highest sensitivity, with the distal sensory latency (DSL) of the median nerve coming next. Combined sensory index (CSI) test at a cutoff point more than 1.1 had 100% specificity and positive predictive value. Abnormal DSL of the median nerve had the best negative predictive value. In patients with early and mild CTS and with normal distal motor latency and DSL, the CSI at cutoff point more than 1.1 is the best EDX test that is able to detect most of these patients.
Conclusion
CSI and its individual components appear as the best EDX tests that help in the diagnosis of patients with early and mild idiopathic CTS.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zanette G, Marani S, Tamburin S. Extra-median spread of sensory symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome suggest the presence of pain-related mechanisms. Pain 2006; 122:264–270
Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, et al. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282:153–158
Graham B, Regehr G, Naglie G, et al. Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 919–924
Massy-Westropp N, Grimmer K, Bain G. A systematic review of the clinical diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25: 120–127
MacDermid JC, Wessel J. Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2004; 17:309–319
Bland JD. The value of the history in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25:445–450
Hislop HJ, Montgomery J. Daniel’s and Worthington ‘s muscletesting: techniques of manual examination. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 2002
Freilich AM, Chhabra AB. Diagnosis and pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome. Curr Opin Orthop 2007; 18:347–351
Srikanteswara PK, Cheluvaiah JD, Agadi JB, Nagaraj K. The relationship between nerve conduction study and clinical grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10:OC13–OC18
Braun RM,Jackson WJ. Electrical studiesas a prognostic factor inthe surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1994; 19:893–900
Witt JC, Hentz JG, Stevens JC. Carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction studies. Muscle Nerve 2004; 29:515–522
Graham B, Dvali L, Regehr G, et al. Variations in diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel among Ontario specialists. Am J Ind Med 2006; 49:8–13
Jackson DA, Clifford JC. Electrodiagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70:199–204
Ginanneschi F, Mondelli M, Dominici F, et al. Changes in motor axon recruitment in the median nerve in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117:2467–2472
Chang MH, Liu LH, Lee YC, et al. Comparison of sensitivity of transcarpal median motor conduction velocity and conventional conduction techniques in electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117:984–991
Sucher BM, Schreiber AL. Carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2014; 25:229–247
Bland JD. The relationship of obesity, age, and carpal tunnel syndrome: more complex than was thought? Muscle Nerve 2005; 32:527–532
Ikeda M, Okada M, Toyama M, et al. Comparison of median nerve cross-sectional area on 3-T MRI in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthopedics 2017; 40:e77–e81
Chen YT, Williams L, Zak MJ, et al. Review of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and a proposed scanning protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 15:12014
Tatar IG, Kurt A, Yavasoglu NG, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: elastosonographic strain ratio and cross-sectional area evaluation for the diagnosis and disease severity. Med Ultrason 2016; 18:305–311
Deniz FE, Oksüz E, Sarikaya B, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of electromyography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome determined by clinical findings. Neurosurgery 2012; 70:610–616
Keith Fowler JR, Cipolli W, Hanson T. A comparison of three diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97:1958–1961
Keith MW, Masear V, Chung K, et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17:389–396
D’Arcy CA, McGee S. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000; 283:3110–3117
D’Arcy CA, McGee S. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000; 283:3110–3117
Kodama M, Tochikura M, Sasao Y, et al. What is the most sensitive test for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome? Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2014; 39: 172–177
Uncini A, Di Muzio A, Awad J, et al. Sensitivity of three median-to-ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16:1366–1373
Sheu JJ, Yuan RY, Chiou HY, et al. Segmental study of the median nerve versus comparative tests in the diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117:1249–1255
Preston DC, Logigian EL. Lumbrical and Interossei recording in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15:1253–1257
Preston DC, Ross MH, Kothari MJ, et al. The median-ulnar latency difference studies are comparable in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1994; 17:1469–1471
Kaul MP, Pagel KJ. Value of the lumbrical-interosseous technique in carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81:691–695
Meena AK, Srinivasa Rao B, Sailaja S,et al. Second lumbrical and interossei latency difference in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 2789–2794
Boonyapisit K, Katirji B, Shapiro BE, et al. Lumbrical and interossei recording in severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2002; 25: 102–105
Löscher WN, Auer-Grumbach M, Trinka E, et al. Comparison of second lumbrical and interosseus latencies with standard measures of median nerve function across the carpal tunnel: a prospective study of 450 hands. J Neurol 2000; 247:530–534
Simovic D, Weinberg DH. The median nerve terminal latency index in carpal tunnel syndrome:a clinical case selection study. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22:573–577
Karata M, Sözay S, Bayramo LUM. Carpal tunnel syndrome terminal latency index and residual latency. Rheumatism 2000; 15:105–111
Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Wang L. Strategies for analyzing nerve conduction data: superiority of a summary index over single tests. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21:1166–1171
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hegab, S.E., Senna, M.K., Hafez, E.A. et al. Toward sensitive and specific electrodiagnostic techniques in early carpal tunnel syndrome. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 45, 57–64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_41_17
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_41_17