Abstract
We apply on-shell methods to the bottom-up construction of electroweak amplitudes, allowing for both renormalizable and non-renormalizable interactions. We use the little-group covariant massive-spinor formalism, and flesh out some of its details along the way. Thanks to the compact form of the resulting amplitudes, many of their properties, and in particular the constraints of perturbative unitarity, are easily seen in this formalism. Our approach is purely bottom-up, assuming just the standard-model electroweak spectrum as well as the conservation of electric charge and fermion number. The most general massive three-point amplitudes consistent with these symmetries are derived and studied in detail, as the primary building blocks for the construction of scattering amplitudes. We employ a simple argument, based on tree-level unitarity of four-point amplitudes, to identify the three-point amplitudes that are non-renormalizable at tree level. This bottom-up analysis remarkably reproduces many low-energy relations implied by electroweak symmetry through the standard-model Higgs mechanism and beyond it. We then discuss four-point amplitudes. The gluing of three-point amplitudes into four-point amplitudes in the massive spinor helicity formalism is clarified. As an example, we work out the ψcψ Zh amplitude, including also the non-factorizable part. The latter is an all-order expression in the effective-field-theory expansion. Further constraints on the couplings are obtained by requiring perturbative unitarity. In the ψcψ Zh example, one for instance obtains the renormalizable-level relations between vector and fermion masses and gauge and Yukawa couplings. We supplement our bottom-up derivations with a matching of three- and fourpoint amplitude coefficients onto the standard-model effective field theory (SMEFT) in the broken electroweak phase. This establishes the correspondence with the usual Lagrangian approach and paves the way for SMEFT computations in the on-shell formalism.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, PhysicaA 96 (1979) 327 [INSPIRE].
H. Elvang and Y.-T. Huang, Scattering amplitudes, arXiv:1308.1697 [INSPIRE].
L.J. Dixon, A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods, in Proceedings, 2012 European School of High-Energy Physics (ESHEP 2012), La Pommeraye, Anjou, France, 6–19 June 2012, CERN-2014-008, (2014), pg. 31 [arXiv:1310.5353] [INSPIRE].
M.D. Schwartz, Quantum field theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2014).
J.M. Henn and J.C. Plefka, Scattering amplitudes in gauge theories, Lect. Notes Phys.883 (2014) 1 [INSPIRE].
H. Elvang and Y.-T. Huang, Scattering amplitudes in gauge theory and gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2015).
C. Cheung, TASI lectures on scattering amplitudes, in Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics (TASI 2016), Boulder, CO, U.S.A., 6 June–1 July 2016, World Scientific, Singapore (2018), pg. 571 [arXiv:1708.03872] [INSPIRE].
Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, Effective field theory amplitudes the on-shell way: scalar and vector couplings to gluons, JHEP02 (2019) 165 [arXiv:1809.09644] [INSPIRE].
C.N. Leung, S.T. Love and S. Rao, Low-energy manifestations of a new interaction scale: operator analysis, Z. Phys.C 31 (1986) 433 [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Algebraic structure of lepton and quark flavor invariants and CP-violation, JHEP10 (2009) 094 [arXiv:0907.4763] [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehman and A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods, JHEP02 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1510.00372] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, … : higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid.09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehman and A. Martin, Hilbert series for constructing Lagrangians: expanding the phenomenologist’s toolbox, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 105014 [arXiv:1503.07537] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, Operator bases, S-matrices and their partition functions, JHEP10 (2017) 199 [arXiv:1706.08520] [INSPIRE].
B. Gripaios and D. Sutherland, DEFT: a program for operators in EFT, JHEP01 (2019) 128 [arXiv:1807.07546] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning and T. Melia, Constructing effective field theories via their harmonics, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 016015 [arXiv:1902.06754] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning and T. Melia, Conformal-helicity duality & the Hilbert space of free CFTs, arXiv:1902.06747 [INSPIRE].
M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra and A. Weiler, Effective field theory of gravity to all orders, arXiv:1908.08050 [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-T. Huang, Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins, arXiv:1709.04891 [INSPIRE].
E. Conde and A. Marzolla, Lorentz constraints on massive three-point amplitudes, JHEP09 (2016) 041 [arXiv:1601.08113] [INSPIRE].
N. Christensen and B. Field, Constructive Standard Model, Phys. Rev.D 98 (2018) 016014 [arXiv:1802.00448] [INSPIRE].
T. Ma, J. Shu and M.-L. Xiao, Standard Model effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes, arXiv:1902.06752 [INSPIRE].
A. Herderschee, S. Koren and T. Trott, Massive on-shell supersymmetric scattering amplitudes, JHEP10 (2019) 092 [arXiv:1902.07204] [INSPIRE].
A. Herderschee, S. Koren and T. Trott, Constructing N = 4 Coulomb branch superamplitudes, JHEP08 (2019) 107 [arXiv:1902.07205] [INSPIRE].
R. Aoude and C.S. Machado, The rise of SMEFT on-shell amplitudes, JHEP12 (2019) 058 [arXiv:1905.11433] [INSPIRE].
A. Ochirov, Helicity amplitudes for QCD with massive quarks, JHEP04 (2018) 089 [arXiv:1802.06730] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio and K. Hinterbichler, Bounds on amplitudes in effective theories with massive spinning particles, Phys. Rev.D 98 (2018) 045003 [arXiv:1804.08686] [INSPIRE].
M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim and S. Lee, The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to black holes, JHEP04 (2019) 156 [arXiv:1812.08752] [INSPIRE].
J. Chen, On the Feynman rules of massive gauge theory in physical gauges, arXiv:1902.06738 [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso and A. Urbano, Amplitudes, resonances and the ultraviolet completion of gravity, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 095013 [arXiv:1906.11687] [INSPIRE].
F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 321 [INSPIRE].
P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508 [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cornwall, D.N. Levin and G. Tiktopoulos, Derivation of gauge invariance from high-energy unitarity bounds on the S matrix, Phys. Rev.D 10 (1974) 1145 [Erratum ibid.D 11 (1975) 972] [INSPIRE].
C.E. Vayonakis, Born helicity amplitudes and cross-sections in non-Abelian gauge theories, Lett. Nuovo Cim.17 (1976) 383 [INSPIRE].
B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high-energies: the role of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev.D 16 (1977) 1519 [INSPIRE].
M.S. Chanowitz and M.K. Gaillard, The TeV physics of strongly interacting W ’s and Z ’s, Nucl. Phys.B 261 (1985) 379 [INSPIRE].
F. Maltoni, L. Mantani and K. Mimasu, Top-quark electroweak interactions at high energy, JHEP10 (2019) 004 [arXiv:1904.05637] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, M.B. Gavela, L. Merlo, S. Rigolin and J. Yepes, The effective chiral Lagrangian for a light dynamical “Higgs particle”, Phys. Lett.B 722 (2013) 330 [Erratum ibid.B 726 (2013) 926] [arXiv:1212.3305] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla, O. Catà and C. Krause, Complete electroweak chiral Lagrangian with a light Higgs at NLO, Nucl. Phys.B 880 (2014) 552 [Erratum ibid.B 913 (2016) 475] [arXiv:1307.5017] [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio et al., Disentangling a dynamical Higgs, JHEP03 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1311.1823] [INSPIRE].
LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector, arXiv:1610.07922 [INSPIRE].
N. Christensen, B. Field, A. Moore and S. Pinto, 2-, 3- and 4-body decays in the constructive Standard Model, arXiv:1909.09164 [INSPIRE].
T. Cohen, H. Elvang and M. Kiermaier, On-shell constructibility of tree amplitudes in general field theories, JHEP04 (2011) 053 [arXiv:1010.0257] [INSPIRE].
L.J. Dixon and Y. Shadmi, Testing gluon selfinteractions in three jet events at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys.B 423 (1994) 3 [Erratum ibid.B 452 (1995) 724] [hep-ph/9312363] [INSPIRE].
L.J. Dixon, E.W.N. Glover and V.V. Khoze, MHV rules for Higgs plus multi-gluon amplitudes, JHEP12 (2004) 015 [hep-th/0411092] [INSPIRE].
A. Dedes, W. Materkowska, M. Paraskevas, J. Rosiek and K. Suxho, Feynman rules for the Standard Model effective field theory in Rξ-gauges, JHEP06 (2017) 143 [arXiv:1704.03888] [INSPIRE].
M.L. Mangano and S.J. Parke, Multiparton amplitudes in gauge theories, Phys. Rept.200 (1991) 301 [hep-th/0509223] [INSPIRE].
R. Kleiss and W.J. Stirling, Spinor techniques for calculating p \( \overline{p} \)→ W±/Z0+ jets, Nucl. Phys.B 262 (1985) 235 [INSPIRE].
S. Dittmaier, Weyl-van der Waerden formalism for helicity amplitudes of massive particles, Phys. Rev.D 59 (1998) 016007 [hep-ph/9805445] [INSPIRE].
L.D. Landau, On the angular momentum of a system of two photons, Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz.60 (1948) 207 [INSPIRE].
C.-N. Yang, Selection rules for the dematerialization of a particle into two photons, Phys. Rev.77 (1950) 242 [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, D. Lombardo, M. Riembau and F. Riva, Measuring Higgs couplings without Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 181801 [arXiv:1812.09299] [INSPIRE].
S. Chang and M.A. Luty, The Higgs trilinear coupling and the scale of new physics, arXiv:1902.05556 [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski and R. Rattazzi, Which EFT, JHEP10 (2019) 255 [arXiv:1902.05936] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny and J. Trnka, Effective field theories from soft limits of scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 221602 [arXiv:1412.4095] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen and J. Trnka, On-shell recursion relations for effective field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 041601 [arXiv:1509.03309] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, C.-H. Shen and J. Trnka, Simple recursion relations for general field theories, JHEP06 (2015) 118 [arXiv:1502.05057] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen and J. Trnka, A periodic table of effective field theories, JHEP02 (2017) 020 [arXiv:1611.03137] [INSPIRE].
I. Low and Z. Yin, Ward identity and scattering amplitudes for nonlinear σ-models, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 061601 [arXiv:1709.08639] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen, J. Trnka and C. Wen, Vector effective field theories from soft limits, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 261602 [arXiv:1801.01496] [INSPIRE].
I. Low and Z. Yin, Soft bootstrap and effective field theories, JHEP11 (2019) 078 [arXiv:1904.12859] [INSPIRE].
H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept.494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].
W. Gordon, Der Strom der Diracschen Elektronentheorie (in German), Z. Phys.50 (1928) 630.
B.L. Roberts, Historical introduction to electric and magnetic moments, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.20 (2009) 1 [INSPIRE].
A. Helset, M. Paraskevas and M. Trott, Gauge fixing the Standard Model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 251801 [arXiv:1803.08001] [INSPIRE].
M. Misiak, M. Paraskevas, J. Rosiek, K. Suxho and B. Zglinicki, Effective field theories in Rξgauges, JHEP02 (2019) 051 [arXiv:1812.11513] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1909.10551
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Durieux, G., Kitahara, T., Shadmi, Y. et al. The electroweak effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 119 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)119
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)119