Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Prospects for dark matter searches in the pMSSM

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 February 2015
  • Volume 2015, article number 14 (2015)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
View saved research
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Prospects for dark matter searches in the pMSSM
Download PDF
  • Leszek Roszkowski1,
  • Enrico Maria Sessolo1 &
  • Andrew J. Williams1 
  • 1044 Accesses

  • 57 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We investigate the prospects for detection of neutralino dark matter in the 19-parameter phenomenological MSSM (pMSSM). We explore very wide ranges of the pMSSM parameters but pay particular attention to the higgsino-like neutralino at the ∼ 1 TeV scale, which has been shown to be a well motivated solution in many constrained supersymmetric models, as well as to a wino-dominated solution with the mass in the range of 2–3 TeV. After summarising the present bounds on the parameter space from direct and indirect detection experiments, we focus on prospects for detection of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). To this end, we derive a realistic assessment of the sensitivity of CTA to photon fluxes from dark matter annihilation by means of a binned likelihood analysis for the Einasto and Navarro-Frenk-White halo profiles. We use the most up to date instrument response functions and background simulation model provided by the CTA Collaboration. We find that, with 500 hours of observation, under the Einasto profile CTA is bound to exclude at the 95% C.L. almost all of the ∼ 1 TeV higgsino region of the pMSSM, effectively closing the window for heavy supersymmetric dark matter in many realistic models. CTA will be able to probe the vast majority of cases corresponding to a spin-independent scattering cross section below the reach of 1-tonne underground detector searches for dark matter, in fact even well below the irreducible neutrino background for direct detection. On the other hand, many points lying beyond the sensitivity of CTA will be within the reach of 1-tonne detectors, and some within collider reach. Altogether, CTA will provide a highly sensitive way of searching for dark matter that will be partially overlapping and partially complementary with 1-tonne detector and collider searches, thus being instrumental to effectively explore the nearly full parameter space of the pMSSM.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Testing dark matter with Cherenkov light — prospects of H.E.S.S. and CTA for exploring minimal supersymmetry

Article Open access 04 October 2019

Robustness of dark matter constraints and interplay with collider searches for New Physics

Article Open access 21 November 2017

Naturalness and dark matter in a realistic intersecting D6-brane model

Article Open access 25 June 2018

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • High-Energy Astrophysics
  • Multimessenger Astronomy
  • Particle Physics
  • Theoretical Particle Physics
  • Particle Astrophysics

References

  1. M. Drees and G. Gerbier, Mini-review of dark matter: 2012, arXiv:1204.2373 [INSPIRE].

  2. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Olive et al., Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on dark matter from colliders, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., Firsst results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. ATLAS collaboration, Search for dark matter in events with a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041802 [arXiv:1309.4017] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. ATLAS collaboration, Search for dark matter in events with a Z boson and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 012004 [arXiv:1404.0051] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter, extra dimensions and unparticles in monojet events in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV, arXiv:1408.3583 [INSPIRE].

  10. CMS collaboration, Monophoton search, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-047, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).

  11. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Dark matter constraints from observations of 25 Milky Way satellite galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 042001 [arXiv:1310.0828] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. H.E.S.S. collaboration, A. Abramowski et al., Search for a dark matter annihilation signal from the galactic center halo with H.E.S.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 161301 [arXiv:1103.3266] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. IceCube collaboration, R. Abbasi et al., Multi-year search for dark matter annihilations in the sun with the AMANDA-II and IceCube detectors, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 042002 [arXiv:1112.1840] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Search for dark matter annihilations in the sun with the 79-string IceCube detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 131302 [arXiv:1212.4097] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., First results on dark matter annihilation in the sun using the ANTARES neutrino telescope, JCAP 11 (2013) 032 [arXiv:1302.6516] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. K.L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096004 [hep-ph/9710473] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Multi-TeV scalars are natural in minimal supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2322 [hep-ph/9908309] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075005 [hep-ph/9909334] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Fowlie, K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Dark matter and collider signatures of the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055012 [arXiv:1306.1567] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and A.J. Williams, What next for the CMSSM and the NUHM: improved prospects for superpartner and dark matter detection, JHEP 08 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1405.4289] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Calibbi, J.M. Lindert, T. Ota and Y. Takanishi, Cornering light neutralino dark matter at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2013) 132 [arXiv:1307.4119] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Calibbi, J.M. Lindert, T. Ota and Y. Takanishi, LHC tests of light neutralino dark matter without light sfermions, JHEP 11 (2014) 106 [arXiv:1410.5730] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia and F. Mahmoudi, Combining monojet, supersymmetry and dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 077701 [arXiv:1311.7641] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay, A. Choudhury, A. Datta and S. Poddar, The electroweak sector of the pMSSM in the light of LHC — 8 TeV and other data, JHEP 07 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1404.4841] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct production of charginos, neutralinos and sleptons in final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 05 (2014) 071 [arXiv:1403.5294] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct production of charginos and neutralinos in events with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 04 (2014) 169 [arXiv:1402.7029] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. CMS collaboration, Searches for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos and sleptons decaying to leptons and W, Z and Higgs bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3036 [arXiv:1405.7570] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  28. CMS collaboration, Searches for electroweak neutralino and chargino production in channels with Higgs, Z and W bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 092007 [arXiv:1409.3168] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. C. Strege et al., Global fits of the CMSSM and NUHM including the LHC Higgs discovery and new XENON100 constraints, JCAP 04 (2013) 013 [arXiv:1212.2636] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. M.E. Cabrera, J.A. Casas and R.R. de Austri, The health of SUSY after the Higgs discovery and the XENON100 data, JHEP 07 (2013) 182 [arXiv:1212.4821] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski and E.M. Sessolo, Two ultimate tests of constrained supersymmetry, JHEP 06 (2013) 078 [arXiv:1302.5956] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. O. Buchmueller et al., The CMSSM and NUHM1 after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2922 [arXiv:1312.5250] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. O. Buchmueller et al., The NUHM2 after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3212 [arXiv:1408.4060] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Bechtle et al., How alive is constrained SUSY really?, arXiv:1410.6035 [INSPIRE].

  35. G.L. Kane, C.F. Kolda, L. Roszkowski and J.D. Wells, Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6173 [hep-ph/9312272] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Profumo and C.E. Yaguna, A statistical analysis of supersymmetric dark matter in the MSSM after WMAP, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 095004 [hep-ph/0407036] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Delgado and G.F. Giudice, The well-tempered neutralino, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 108 [hep-ph/0601041] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. L. Roszkowski, R. Ruiz de Austri, R. Trotta, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.A. Varley, Global fits of the non-universal Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 015014 [arXiv:0903.1279] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Kaminska, G.G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Non-universal gaugino masses and fine tuning implications for SUSY searches in the MSSM and the GNMSSM, JHEP 11 (2013) 209 [arXiv:1308.4168] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski, Low fine tuning in the MSSM with higgsino dark matter and unification constraints, JHEP 04 (2014) 166 [arXiv:1402.1328] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay, S. Rao and D.P. Roy, Higgsino dark matter in nonuniversal gaugino mass models, arXiv:1411.4517 [INSPIRE].

  44. G.F. Giudice, M.A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi, Gaugino mass without singlets, JHEP 12 (1998) 027 [hep-ph/9810442] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Out of this world supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 557 (1999) 79 [hep-th/9810155] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. L.J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Spread supersymmetry, JHEP 01 (2012) 082 [arXiv:1111.4519] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. A. Arvanitaki, N. Craig, S. Dimopoulos and G. Villadoro, Mini-split, JHEP 02 (2013) 126 [arXiv:1210.0555] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura and S. Shirai, Spread supersymmetry with wino LSP: gluino and dark matter signals, JHEP 01 (2013) 036 [arXiv:1210.2395] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Gupta, D.E. Kaplan, N. Weiner and T. Zorawski, Simply unnatural supersymmetry, arXiv:1212.6971 [INSPIRE].

  50. T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, A. Pierce and T.R. Slatyer, Wino dark matter under siege, JCAP 10 (2013) 061 [arXiv:1307.4082] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. J. Fan and M. Reece, In wino veritas? Indirect searches shed light on neutralino dark matter, JHEP 10 (2013) 124 [arXiv:1307.4400] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. A. Hryczuk, I. Cholis, R. Iengo, M. Tavakoli and P. Ullio, Indirect detection analysis: wino dark matter case study, JCAP 07 (2014) 031 [arXiv:1401.6212] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. J. Hisano, S. Matsumsoto and M.M. Nojiri, Unitarity and higher order corrections in neutralino dark matter annihilation into two photons, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 075014 [hep-ph/0212022] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M.M. Nojiri and O. Saito, Non-perturbative effect on dark matter annihilation and gamma ray signature from galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063528 [hep-ph/0412403] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M. Nagai, O. Saito and M. Senami, Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007) 34 [hep-ph/0610249] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and M. Tamburini, Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 787 (2007) 152 [arXiv:0706.4071] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. A. Hryczuk, R. Iengo and P. Ullio, Relic densities including Sommerfeld enhancements in the MSSM, JHEP 03 (2011) 069 [arXiv:1010.2172] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. H.E.S.S. collaboration, A. Abramowski et al., Search for photon-linelike signatures from dark matter annihilations with H.E.S.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 041301 [arXiv:1301.1173] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. A. Burkert, The structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies, IAU Symp. 171 (1996) 175 [Astrophys. J. 447 (1995) L25] [astro-ph/9504041] [INSPIRE].

  60. B.S. Acharya et al., Introducing the CTA concept, Astropart. Phys. 43 (2013) 3 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. CTA collaboration, M. Doro et al., Dark matter and fundamental physics with the Cherenkov Telescope Array, Astropart. Phys. 43 (2013) 189 [arXiv:1208.5356] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. M. Wood et al., Prospects for indirect detection of dark matter with CTA, arXiv:1305.0302 [INSPIRE].

  63. M. Pierre, J.M. Siegal-Gaskins and P. Scott, Sensitivity of CTA to dark matter signals from the galactic center, JCAP 06 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1401.7330] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. H. Silverwood, C. Weniger, P. Scott and G. Bertone, A realistic assessment of the CTA sensitivity to dark matter annihilation, arXiv:1408.4131 [INSPIRE].

  65. K.N. Abazajian and J.P. Harding, Constraints on WIMP and Sommerfeld-enhanced dark matter annihilation from H.E.S.S. observations of the galactic center, JCAP 01 (2012) 041 [arXiv:1110.6151] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. J. Aleksić et al., Optimized dark matter searches in deep observations of Segue 1 with MAGIC, JCAP 02 (2014) 008 [arXiv:1312.1535] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. VERITAS collaboration, A. Geringer-Sameth, The VERITAS dark matter program, arXiv:1303.1406 [INSPIRE].

  68. MSSM Working Group collaboration, A. Djouadi et al., The minimal supersymmetric standard model: group summary report, hep-ph/9901246 [INSPIRE].

  69. M. Cahill-Rowley et al., Complementarity of dark matter searches in the pMSSM, arXiv:1405.6716 [INSPIRE].

  70. J. Carr, private communication.

  71. K. Bernlöhr et al., Monte Carlo design studies for the Cherenkov Telescope Array, Astropart. Phys. 43 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1210.3503] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. J. Einasto, On the construction of a composite model for the galaxy and on the determination of the system of galactic parameters, Trudy Astrofiz. Inst. Alma-Ata 5 (1965) 87.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 462 (1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. ATLAS, CDF, CMS and D0 collaborations, First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass, arXiv:1403.4427 [INSPIRE].

  75. A. Fowlie et al., The CMSSM favoring new territories: the impact of new LHC limits and a 125 GeV Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1206.0264] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. K. Kowalska et al., Constrained next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model with a 126 GeV Higgs boson: a global analysis, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115010 [arXiv:1211.1693] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 398 (2009) 1601 [arXiv:0809.3437] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. B.C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, FeynHiggs: a program for the calculation of the masses of the neutral CP even Higgs bosons in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 124 (2000) 76 [hep-ph/9812320] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, The masses of the neutral CP-even Higgs bosons in the MSSM: accurate analysis at the two loop level, Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 343 [hep-ph/9812472] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich and G. Weiglein, Towards high precision predictions for the MSSM Higgs sector, Eur. Phys. J. C 28 (2003) 133 [hep-ph/0212020] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. M. Frank et al., The Higgs boson masses and mixings of the complex MSSM in the Feynman-diagrammatic approach, JHEP 02 (2007) 047 [hep-ph/0611326] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak and G. Weiglein, High-precision predictions for the light CP-even Higgs boson mass of the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 141801 [arXiv:1312.4937] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein, HiggsSignals: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2711 [arXiv:1305.1933] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K.E. Williams, HiggsBounds: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 138 [arXiv:0811.4169] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K.E. Williams, HiggsBounds 2.0.0: confronting neutral and charged Higgs sector predictions with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2605 [arXiv:1102.1898] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. P. Bechtle et al., HiggsBounds-4: improved tests of extended Higgs sectors against exclusion bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2693 [arXiv:1311.0055] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso v2.3: a program for calculating flavor physics observables in supersymmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1579 [arXiv:0808.3144] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 3 : a program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. K. Cheung, Y.-L.S. Tsai, P.-Y. Tseng, T.-C. Yuan and A. Zee, Global study of the simplest scalar phantom dark matter model, JCAP 10 (2012) 042 [arXiv:1207.4930] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A16 [arXiv:1303.5076] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  92. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  93. Electroweak radiative B decays webpage, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/rare/2012/radll/index.html.

  94. Belle collaboration, I. Adachi et al., Evidence for \( {B}^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) with a hadronic tagging method using the full data sample of Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 131801 [arXiv:1208.4678] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  95. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the B 0 s  → μ + μ − branching fraction and search for B 0 → μ + μ − decays at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101805 [arXiv:1307.5024] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  96. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the B s → μ + μ − branching fraction and search for B 0 → μ + μ − with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101804 [arXiv:1307.5025] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. K. Kowalska and E.M. Sessolo, Natural MSSM after the LHC 8 TeV run, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 075001 [arXiv:1307.5790] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. Muon G-2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. J.P. Miller, E. de Rafael and B.L. Roberts, Muon (g-2): experiment and theory, Rept. Prog. Phys. 70 (2007) 795 [hep-ph/0703049] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. J.R. Ellis, L. Roszkowski and Z. Lalak, Higgs effects on the relic supersymmetric particle density, Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 545 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  101. B. Cabrera, L.M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, Bolometric detection of neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 25 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  102. J. Monroe and P. Fisher, Neutrino backgrounds to dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 033007 [arXiv:0706.3019] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. J. Billard, L. Strigari and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 023524 [arXiv:1307.5458] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. K. Griest, M. Kamionkowski and M.S. Turner, Supersymmetric dark matter above the W mass, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3565 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  105. M. Drees and M.M. Nojiri, The neutralino relic density in minimal N = 1 supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 376 [hep-ph/9207234] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  106. J.R. Ellis, T. Falk and K.A. Olive, Neutralino-stau coannihilation and the cosmological upper limit on the mass of the lightest supersymmetric particle, Phys. Lett. B 444 (1998) 367 [hep-ph/9810360] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. J.R. Ellis, A. Ferstl and K.A. Olive, Reevaluation of the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 481 (2000) 304 [hep-ph/0001005] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  108. J.R. Ellis, A. Ferstl and K.A. Olive, Exploration of elastic scattering rates for supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 065016 [hep-ph/0001005] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  109. J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive, Y. Santoso and V.C. Spanos, Update on the direct detection of supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 095007 [hep-ph/0502001] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  110. H. Baer, A. Mustafayev, E.-K. Park and X. Tata, Target dark matter detection rates in models with a well-tempered neutralino, JCAP 01 (2007) 017 [hep-ph/0611387] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  111. P. Huang and C.E.M. Wagner, Blind spots for neutralino dark matter in the MSSM with an intermediate m A , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015018 [arXiv:1404.0392] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  112. J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 1879 [hep-ph/9704361] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  113. A. Hryczuk and R. Iengo, The one-loop and Sommerfeld electroweak corrections to the wino dark matter annihilation, JHEP 01 (2012) 163 [Erratum ibid. 06 (2012) 137] [arXiv:1111.2916] [INSPIRE].

  114. L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, Freeze-in production of FIMP dark matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080 [arXiv:0911.1120] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  115. A.J. Williams, C. Boehm, S.M. West and D.A. Vasquez, Regenerating WIMPs in the light of direct and indirect detection, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 055018 [arXiv:1204.3727] INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  116. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  117. PAMELA collaboration, O. Adriani et al., An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5-100 GeV, Nature 458 (2009) 607 [arXiv:0810.4995] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  118. AMS collaboration, M. Aguilar et al., First result from the alpha magnetic spectrometer on the international space station: precision measurement of the positron fraction in primary cosmic rays of 0.5-350 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 141102 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  119. M. Bauer, T. Cohen, R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Soft collinear effective theory for heavy WIMP annihilation, arXiv:1409.7392 [INSPIRE].

  120. E.A. Baltz and J. Edsjo, Positron propagation and fluxes from neutralino annihilation in the halo, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1998) 023511 [astro-ph/9808243] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  121. I.V. Moskalenko and A.W. Strong, Production and propagation of cosmic ray positrons and electrons, Astrophys. J. 493 (1998) 694 [astro-ph/9710124] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  122. P. Salucci et al., The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies. 2. The dark matter distribution out to the virial radius, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 378 (2007) 41 [astro-ph/0703115] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  123. F. Nesti and P. Salucci, The dark matter halo of the Milky Way, AD 2013, JCAP 07 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1304.5127] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  124. V. Bertin for the ANTARES Dark Matter Group, private communication.

  125. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile, The XENON1T dark matter search experiment, Springer Proc. Phys. 148 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1206.6288] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  126. P.A. Amaudruz et al., DEAP-3600 dark matter search, arXiv:1410.7673 [INSPIRE].

  127. D.C. Malling et al., After LUX: the LZ program, arXiv:1110.0103 [INSPIRE].

  128. V. Barger, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia and E.M. Sessolo, Fermion WIMPless dark matter at DeepCore and IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 115010 [arXiv:1004.4573] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  129. L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Bayesian implications of current LHC supersymmetry and dark matter detection searches for the constrained MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095005 [arXiv:1202.1503] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  130. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, F. Halzen and S. Mohapatra, Identifying galactic PeVatrons with neutrinos, Astropart. Phys. 31 (2009) 437 [arXiv:0902.1176] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  131. V. Barger, Y. Gao and D. Marfatia, Dark matter at DeepCore and IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 055012 [arXiv:1101.4410] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  132. ATLAS collaboration, Search for strong production of supersymmetric particles in final states with missing transverse momentum and at least three b-jets at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1407.0600] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  133. ATLAS collaboration, Search for top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1407.0583] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  134. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct third-generation squark pair production in final states with missing transverse momentum and two b-jets in \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2013) 189 [arXiv:1308.2631] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  135. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV in events with a single lepton, large jet multiplicity and multiple b jets, Phys. Lett. B 733 (2014) 328 [arXiv:1311.4937] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  136. T.-P. Li and Y.-Q. Ma, Analysis methods for results in gamma-ray astronomy, Astrophys. J. 272 (1983) 317 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  137. J.G. Skellam, The frequency distribution of the difference between two Poisson variates belonging to different populations, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 109 (1946) 296.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  138. H.E.S.S. collaboration, F. Aharonian et al., Discovery of very-high-energy gamma-rays from the galactic centre ridge, Nature 439 (2006) 695 [astro-ph/0603021] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  139. Fermi-LAT collaboration, Fermi-LAT observations of the diffuse gamma-ray emission: implications for cosmic rays and the interstellar medium, Astrophys. J. 750 (2012) 3 [arXiv:1202.4039] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centre for Nuclear Research, HoŻa 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland

    Leszek Roszkowski, Enrico Maria Sessolo & Andrew J. Williams

Authors
  1. Leszek Roszkowski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrico Maria Sessolo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew J. Williams
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Maria Sessolo.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1411.5214

On leave of absence from the University of Sheffield, U.K. (Leszek Roszkowski)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roszkowski, L., Sessolo, E.M. & Williams, A.J. Prospects for dark matter searches in the pMSSM. J. High Energ. Phys. 2015, 14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2015)014

Download citation

  • Received: 02 December 2014

  • Accepted: 14 January 2015

  • Published: 03 February 2015

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2015)014

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Supersymmetry Phenomenology

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature