Abstract
We derive the causality and unitarity constraints on dimension 6 and dimension 8 Gluon field strength operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). In the first part of the paper, we use the ‘amplitude analysis’ i.e. dispersion relation for 2 → 2 scattering in the forward limit, to put bounds on the Wilson coefficients. We show that the dimension 6 operators can exist only in the presence of certain dimension 8 operators. It is interesting that the square of the dimension 6 Wilson coefficients can be constrained in this case even at the tree level. In the second part of this work, we successfully rederive all these bounds using the classical causality argument that demands that the speed of fluctuations about any non-trivial background should not exceed the speed of light. We also point out some subtleties in the superluminality analysis regarding whether the low-frequency phase velocity can always be used as the relevant quantity for Causality violation: as an example, we show that, due to these subtleties, if a small pion mass is added in the chiral Lagrangian, it is unclear if any strict positivity bound can be derived on the dimension 8 Wilson coefficient. Finally, we mention an interesting non-relativistic example where the subluminality requirement produces a stronger bound than the ‘amplitude analysis’.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C.P. Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, Cambridge University Press (2020) [INSPIRE].
W. Skiba, Effective Field Theory and Precision Electroweak Measurements, in the proceedings of Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small, (2011), pp. 5–70 [https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814327183_0001] [arXiv:1006.2142] [INSPIRE].
A. Adams et al., Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178] [INSPIRE].
S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and D. Simmons-Duffin, Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity, arXiv:2201.06602 [CALT-TH 2021-003] [INSPIRE].
M. Carrillo Gonzalez, C. de Rham, V. Pozsgay and A.J. Tolley, Causal effective field theories, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 105018 [arXiv:2207.03491] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham et al., Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics, in the proceedings of 2022 Snowmass Summer Study, (2022) [arXiv:2203.06805] [INSPIRE].
T.N. Pham and T.N. Truong, Evaluation of the Derivative Quartic Terms of the Meson Chiral Lagrangian From Forward Dispersion Relation, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3027 [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 081702 [arXiv:1702.06134] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064076 [arXiv:1509.00851] [INSPIRE].
J. Bros, H. Epstein and V.J. Glaser, Some rigorous analyticity properties of the four-point function in momentum space, Nuovo Cim. 31 (1964) 1265 [INSPIRE].
H. Lehmann, Analytic properties of scattering amplitudes as functions of momentum transfer, Nuovo Cim. 10 (1958) 579 [INSPIRE].
J. Elias Miro, A. Guerrieri and M.A. Gumus, Bridging Positivity and S-matrix Bootstrap Bounds, arXiv:2210.01502 [INSPIRE].
I. Low, R. Rattazzi and A. Vichi, Theoretical Constraints on the Higgs Effective Couplings, JHEP 04 (2010) 126 [arXiv:0907.5413] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, S. Rychkov and A. Urbano, What if the Higgs couplings to W and Z bosons are larger than in the Standard Model?, JHEP 04 (2012) 073 [arXiv:1202.1532] [INSPIRE].
Y. Ema, R. Kitano and T. Terada, Unitarity constraint on the Kähler curvature, JHEP 09 (2018) 075 [arXiv:1807.06940] [INSPIRE].
J. Gu and L.-T. Wang, Sum Rules in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory from Helicity Amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2021) 149 [arXiv:2008.07551] [INSPIRE].
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 036006 [arXiv:2010.04723] [INSPIRE].
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT, JHEP 09 (2022) 030 [arXiv:2206.13524] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, D. Ghosh and A.H. Singh, Four-fermion operators at dimension 6: Dispersion relations and UV completions, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115019 [arXiv:2112.02302] [INSPIRE].
C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095003 [arXiv:1808.00010] [INSPIRE].
X. Li et al., Positivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 121601 [arXiv:2101.01191] [INSPIRE].
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Flavor Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 081601 [Erratum ibid. 127 (2021) 149901] [arXiv:2004.02885] [INSPIRE].
Q. Bonnefoy, E. Gendy and C. Grojean, Positivity bounds on Minimal Flavor Violation, JHEP 04 (2021) 115 [arXiv:2011.12855] [INSPIRE].
T. Trott, Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory, JHEP 07 (2021) 143 [arXiv:2011.10058] [INSPIRE].
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Consistency of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 12 (2019) 032 [arXiv:1908.09845] [INSPIRE].
G. Goon and K. Hinterbichler, Superluminality, black holes and EFT, JHEP 02 (2017) 134 [arXiv:1609.00723] [INSPIRE].
L. Brillouin, Wave propagation and group velocity, Pure and Applied Physics, Academic Press, New York (1960).
J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Wiley (1998).
I.T. Drummond and S.J. Hathrell, QED Vacuum Polarization in a Background Gravitational Field and Its Effect on the Velocity of Photons, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 343 [INSPIRE].
X.O. Camanho, J.D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling, JHEP 02 (2016) 020 [arXiv:1407.5597] [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and R.A. Rosen, Eikonal scattering and asymptotic superluminality of massless higher spin fields, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 125019 [arXiv:1712.10021] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, D. Green, H. Lee and R.A. Porto, Signs of Analyticity in Single-Field Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 023523 [arXiv:1502.07304] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, Softness and amplitudes’ positivity for spinning particles, JHEP 02 (2017) 034 [arXiv:1605.06111] [INSPIRE].
M. Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys. Rev. 123 (1961) 1053 [INSPIRE].
Y.S. Jin and A. Martin, Number of Subtractions in Fixed-Transfer Dispersion Relations, Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) B1375 [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzyński, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model Eective Field Theory, JHEP 10 (2020) 174 [arXiv:2005.00059] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Complete set of dimension-eight operators in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015026 [arXiv:2005.00008] [INSPIRE].
V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256 (2020) 107478 [arXiv:2001.04407] [INSPIRE].
V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207 (2016) 432 [arXiv:1601.01167] [INSPIRE].
R. Mertig, M. Böhm and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345 [INSPIRE].
J. Quevillon, C. Smith and S. Touati, Effective action for gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 013003 [arXiv:1810.06994] [INSPIRE].
C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Convex Geometry Perspective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field Theory Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 201601 [arXiv:2005.03047] [INSPIRE].
R. Fox, C.G. Kuper and S.G. Lipson, Do faster-than-light group velocities imply violation of causality?, Nature 223 (1969) 597 [INSPIRE].
N. Brunner et al., Direct Measurement of Superluminal Group Velocity and Signal Velocity in an Optical Fiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 203902.
E. Recami, Superluminal waves and objects: An overview of the relevant experiments, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 196 (2009) 012020 [INSPIRE].
T.J. Hollowood and G.M. Shore, Causality and Micro-Causality in Curved Spacetime, Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 67 [arXiv:0707.2302] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung et al., The Effective Field Theory of Inflation, JHEP 03 (2008) 014 [arXiv:0709.0293] [INSPIRE].
P. Creminelli, O. Janssen and L. Senatore, Positivity bounds on effective field theories with spontaneously broken Lorentz invariance, JHEP 09 (2022) 201 [arXiv:2207.14224] [INSPIRE].
H. Elvang and Y.-T. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes, arXiv:1308.1697 [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity, JHEP 05 (2010) 095 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2011) 128] [arXiv:0912.4258] [INSPIRE].
Q. Bi, C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space, JHEP 06 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1902.08977] [INSPIRE].
L.B. OKUN, Chapter 29 — Appendix (Some useful formulas), in Leptons and Quarks, L. Okun ed., North-Holland Personal Library, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1984), pp. 308–328 [https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-86924-1.50032-5].
H. Elvang and Y.-T. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes, arXiv:1308.1697 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2211.01322
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghosh, D., Sharma, R. & Ullah, F. Amplitude’s positivity vs. subluminality: causality and unitarity constraints on dimension 6 & 8 gluonic operators in the SMEFT. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)199
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)199