Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
W. Bizoń, U. Haisch and L. Rottoli, Constraints on the quartic Higgs self-coupling from double-Higgs production at future hadron colliders, JHEP 10 (2019) 267 [arXiv:1810.04665] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Constraints on the Higgs boson self-coupling from single- and double-Higgs production with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 137745 [arXiv:2211.01216] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022) 60 [arXiv:2207.00043] [INSPIRE].
M. Cepeda et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221 [arXiv:1902.00134] [INSPIRE].
P. Stylianou and G. Weiglein, Constraints on the trilinear and quartic Higgs couplings from triple Higgs production at the LHC and beyond, arXiv:2312.04646 [INSPIRE].
R. Contino et al., Higgs and EW symmetry breaking studies, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 3 (2017) 255 [arXiv:1606.09408] [INSPIRE].
M.L. Mangano et al., Standard Model Processes, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 3 (2017) 1 [arXiv:1607.01831] [INSPIRE].
A. Papaefstathiou and K. Sakurai, Triple Higgs boson production at a 100 TeV proton-proton collider, JHEP 02 (2016) 006 [arXiv:1508.06524] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Chen et al., Probing triple-Higgs productions via 4b2γ decay channel at a 100 TeV hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 013007 [arXiv:1510.04013] [INSPIRE].
W. Kilian et al., New Physics in multi-Higgs boson final states, JHEP 06 (2017) 145 [arXiv:1702.03554] [INSPIRE].
B. Fuks, J.H. Kim and S.J. Lee, Scrutinizing the Higgs quartic coupling at a future 100 TeV proton-proton collider with taus and b-jets, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 354 [arXiv:1704.04298] [INSPIRE].
M. McCullough, An Indirect Model-Dependent Probe of the Higgs Self-Coupling, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015001 [Erratum ibid. 92 (2015) 039903] [arXiv:1312.3322] [INSPIRE].
M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Indirect probes of the trilinear Higgs coupling: gg → h and h → γγ, JHEP 10 (2016) 094 [arXiv:1607.03773] [INSPIRE].
G. Degrassi, P.P. Giardino, F. Maltoni and D. Pagani, Probing the Higgs self coupling via single Higgs production at the LHC, JHEP 12 (2016) 080 [arXiv:1607.04251] [INSPIRE].
S. Borowka et al., Probing the scalar potential via double Higgs boson production at hadron colliders, JHEP 04 (2019) 016 [arXiv:1811.12366] [INSPIRE].
S. Borowka et al., Higgs Boson Pair Production in Gluon Fusion at Next-to-Leading Order with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 012001 [Erratum ibid. 117 (2016) 079901] [arXiv:1604.06447] [INSPIRE].
S. Borowka et al., Full top quark mass dependence in Higgs boson pair production at NLO, JHEP 10 (2016) 107 [arXiv:1608.04798] [INSPIRE].
G. Heinrich et al., NLO predictions for Higgs boson pair production with full top quark mass dependence matched to parton showers, JHEP 08 (2017) 088 [arXiv:1703.09252] [INSPIRE].
G. Heinrich et al., Probing the trilinear Higgs boson coupling in di-Higgs production at NLO QCD including parton shower effects, JHEP 06 (2019) 066 [arXiv:1903.08137] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].
J. Butterworth et al., PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001 [arXiv:1510.03865] [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].
G. Heinrich, J. Lang and L. Scyboz, SMEFT predictions for gg → hh at full NLO QCD and truncation uncertainties, JHEP 08 (2022) 079 [arXiv:2204.13045] [INSPIRE].
E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi and R. Gröber, Higgs boson pair production at NLO in the POWHEG approach and the top quark mass uncertainties, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1054 [arXiv:2309.10525] [INSPIRE].
M. Grazzini et al., Higgs boson pair production at NNLO with top quark mass effects, JHEP 05 (2018) 059 [arXiv:1803.02463] [INSPIRE].
S. Amoroso et al., Les Houches 2019: Physics at TeV Colliders: Standard Model Working Group Report, in the proceedings of the 11th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders: PhysTeV Les Houches, Les Houches, France (2020) [arXiv:2003.01700] [INSPIRE].
J. Baglio et al., gg → HH: Combined uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 056002 [arXiv:2008.11626] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Javier Mazzitelli and Carlo Pandini for various discussions. We thank Franziska Rauscher for preliminary studies in the initial stages of this work. L.R. has been supported by the SNSF under contract PZ00P2 201878. P.W acknowledges support from a Grainger Fellowship at the University of Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Addendum to: JHEP10(2019)267
ArXiv ePrint: 1810.04665
Author contributed to this addendum only. (Zach Gillis, Brian Moser, Philipp Windischhofer)
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bizoń, W., Haisch, U., Rottoli, L. et al. Addendum to: Constraints on the quartic Higgs self-coupling from double-Higgs production at future hadron colliders. J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 170 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2024)170
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2024)170